This document summarizes the results of the 6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors conducted in Summer 2015. It finds that nuclear power plant neighbors continue to be more favorable toward nuclear energy and their nearby plant than the general public. Specifically, plant neighbors have a very favorable impression of their nearby plant's operations and safety, support building new reactors, and feel the plant benefits the local economy and community. While plant neighbors feel quite well informed on most topics, they place the highest trust in information from the local nuclear power plant. In summary, the survey finds ongoing extraordinary support among nuclear power plant neighbors for nuclear energy and their nearby facility.
These survey results are from a recent webinar Regroup recently hosted entitled “Extreme Weather: Best Practices in Preparedness and Communication.”
Over 600 attendees were polled to help them determine if their organization is really prepared for a natural disaster or severe weather event.
O medo da energia nuclear se estabeleceu na sociedade desde que ela foi apresentada à humanidade pelos holocaustos de Hiroshima e Nagasaki, em 1945, sob a forma do que se poderia chamar de “o pior caso de marketing da História”. Ele segue seu caminho através da nossa cultura e nunca está longe nas discussões públicas sobre política nuclear.
These survey results are from a recent webinar Regroup recently hosted entitled “Extreme Weather: Best Practices in Preparedness and Communication.”
Over 600 attendees were polled to help them determine if their organization is really prepared for a natural disaster or severe weather event.
O medo da energia nuclear se estabeleceu na sociedade desde que ela foi apresentada à humanidade pelos holocaustos de Hiroshima e Nagasaki, em 1945, sob a forma do que se poderia chamar de “o pior caso de marketing da História”. Ele segue seu caminho através da nossa cultura e nunca está longe nas discussões públicas sobre política nuclear.
2016 panorama da energia nuclear -nova edição 2016 mLeonam Guimarães
O crescimento econômico, a prosperidade e o aumento da população levarão inevitavelmente ao aumento do consumo de energia nas próximas décadas. O mundo muda a cada dia com os desenvolvimentos da economia, as alterações climáticas e a energia trazendo novos desafios e novas oportunidades. A indústria nuclear não é diferente e também não é imune ao impacto destes desenvolvimentos.
A urgência de enfrentar a pobreza global e reduzir as emissões de gases do efeito estufa exige que consideremos a energia nuclear com todas as suas possibilidades. Os fatos básicos da tecnologia - bons e maus - devem ser confrontados.
Expandir a oferta de energia elétrica e simultaneamente reduzir os efeitos das mudanças climáticas é o desafio que se apresenta aos formuladores de políticas energéticas. A substituição de 137 reatores nucleares em término de vida útil, nos próximos 20 anos, quer por outros nucleares, quer por outras fontes energéticas, é uma questão que exigirá investimentos muito expressivos de todos os países envolvidos.
Os fatores geopolíticos que envolvem o suprimento de energia também não podem ser descartados e em muitos casos a energia nuclear é a única opção para garantir maior segurança nacional de suprimento e diminuição da exposição em relação à volatilidade do preço do petróleo e à importação de combustíveis.
Em dezembro de 2015, o acordo de Paris consolidou anos de negociações com um acordo entre 188 países para limitar as emissões de dióxido de carbono. Muitos países estão impulsionando ativamente o crescimento de seus planos de produção de energia nuclear para fazer frente aos compromissos que assumiram quanto às mudanças climáticas.
Apesar do grande número de países emergentes em energia nuclear, eles não devem contribuir muito para a expansão da capacidade nuclear no futuro previsível - o principal crescimento virá em países onde a tecnologia já está bem estabelecida, principalmente na Ásia. No entanto, a longo prazo, a tendência de urbanização em países menos desenvolvidos vai aumentar muito a demanda por eletricidade, especialmente, a fornecida por centrais geração de energia de base, como nuclear.
A disponibilidade de novas tecnologias e o progresso realizado para desenvolver sites que sejam publicamente aceitáveis, leva à construção de novas instalações nucleares. A energia nuclear tem vantagens ambientais distintas sobre os combustíveis fósseis, podendo conter e gerenciar virtualmente todos os seus resíduos sem causar qualquer tipo de poluição não controlável.
Cabe lembrar que ao longo de décadas de uso pacífico da energia nuclear, jamais houve desvio de urânio para uso militar. A energia nuclear civil não tem sido a causa ou a rota para armas nucleares em qualquer país que tenha arsenal nuclear.
BRASIL NOS BRICS: capítulo 5 - ENERGIA NUCLEAR NOS BRICSLeonam Guimarães
É inequívoca a importância estratégica de o Brasil se manter ativo na exploração dos usos pacíficos da energia nuclear, expandindo seu domínio tecnológico e capacidade industrial instalada nos diversos setores associados, como produção de radioisótopos para medicina e indústria, produção de combustível nuclear, propulsão nuclear naval e geração elétrica nuclear. Para isso, a cooperação dentro elos BRICS desponta como uma excelente oportunidade.
Estratégias de Aceitação Pública da Geração Elétrica NuclearLeonam Guimarães
Os países que embarcam em programas nucleares, geralmente têm fortes razões parafazê-lo, incluindo a falta de boas alternativas para satisfazer suas necessidades degeração de energia elétrica. Essas razões também podem incluir a confiança nasegurança das usinas nucleares existentes e, particularmente, a confiança em quetecnologias ainda mais seguras estarão em operação em breve. Na maioria dos casos,quando a opinião pública compreender as razões subjacentes para adotar a geraçãoelétrica nuclear, haverá apoio às decisões dos formuladores de políticas.
Programa da propulsão nuclear naval catalisador do desenvolvimento da tecnolo...Leonam Guimarães
João Roberto Loureiro de Mattos* e Leonam dos Santos Guimarães**
*Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN/SP
Av. Lineu Prestes 2.242 – Cidade Universitária
05508-000 São Paulo, SP, Brasil
**Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo - CTMSP
Av. Lineu Prestes 2.468
05508-900 Butantã, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
RESUMO
Constituindo-se em um dos maiores empreendimentos de desenvolvimento autóctone de
tecnologia já realizados no País, o programa de desenvolvimento da propulsão nuclear naval,
desenvolvido pela Marinha do Brasil através do Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo –
CTMSP, tem cumprido um importante papel de integração de competências técnicas e institucionais,
bem como a manutenção de massa crítica de pessoal ao longo das décadas de 80 e 90, onde a falta de
política clara para a área nuclear indicava um iminente desmonte do setor. O programa de
desenvolvimento da propulsão nuclear naval funciona como um agregador e catalisador de
competências num setor altamente competitivo e especializado como é o nuclear.
Este artigo apresenta os interesses do Brasil na sua fronteira marítima, a inserção da propulsão
nuclear naval neste contexto, a estratégia da Marinha do Brasil para obter este tipo de tecnologia, a
descrição do protótipo em terra – INAP, a situação atual deste empreendimento e o seu caráter de
integração no cenário nuclear brasileiro.
Wide margins of Wisconsin voters say that they want to see Wisconsin meet more of its energy needs through clean, renewable sources like wind, solar and bioenergy and energy efficiency, according to a recent bipartisan poll. They are also more likely to support candidates this who say they will promote more use of clean renewable energy like wind and solar power. The polling was conducted July 26 through Aug. 3 by a bipartisan research team comprised of Public Opinion Strategies (R) and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz and Associates (D). The margin of error is +/- 4.9 percent, with more than 400 Wisconsin voters representing a cross section of demographics including political affiliation, race, sex and locality. The polling was done was part of nonpartisan outreach efforts to broaden the conversation on energy issues between candidates and voters throughout the Midwest.
5 Barriers to and Solutions for Community Renewable Energy John Farrell
Community renewable energy has significant political and economic benefits, but is often hindered by five major barriers. This vividly illustrated presentation explains how communities can overcome the barriers and advance more local renewable energy.
ILSR Senior Researcher John Farrell gave this presentation as part of a Sustainable Economies Law Center webinar on April 30, 2013. You can view the presentation with audio at http://youtu.be/3dCcqIEl5d4
Ipsos MORI research on public attitudes to the UK’s energy challengesIpsos UK
The British public are now far more concerned by energy security than climate change compared with people around the world. There is recognition we need a diverse mix of energy sources to meet needs, including support for nuclear. However, consumers themselves are still wedded to gas, and have limited awareness of alternative options. Ben Page gave this presentation to Madano Partnership's breakfast briefing on the UK’s evolving energy policy: Opportunties and Challenges on 25 April 2013.
Public Rooftop Revolution: Putting the Solar Shine on City BuildingsJohn Farrell
There are many stories on residential rooftop solar but few on what cities are doing to make themselves energy self-reliant by using their own buildings and lands to generate power.
In Public Rooftop Revolution, ILSR estimates that mid-sized cities could install as much as 5,000 megawatts of solar—as much as one-quarter of all solar installed in the U.S. to date—on municipal property, with little to no upfront cash. It would allow cities to redirect millions in saved energy costs to other public purposes.
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEdelman_UK
The UK energy sector results from the 2014 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The annual Trust Barometer is the largest study of its kind, and explores rising and falling levels of trust across twenty-seven markets, and 33,000 people; considering different industry sectors; as well as the impact and perception of government, business, media and society
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman
The Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions research shows that even while people’s exposure to natural gas news trends positive, the intensity of any support is very soft—and the window is closing.
GTM Research Senior Analyst Cory Honeyman on the State and Future of the U.S. Solar Market.
Presentation from Solar Power International, September 2015
2016 panorama da energia nuclear -nova edição 2016 mLeonam Guimarães
O crescimento econômico, a prosperidade e o aumento da população levarão inevitavelmente ao aumento do consumo de energia nas próximas décadas. O mundo muda a cada dia com os desenvolvimentos da economia, as alterações climáticas e a energia trazendo novos desafios e novas oportunidades. A indústria nuclear não é diferente e também não é imune ao impacto destes desenvolvimentos.
A urgência de enfrentar a pobreza global e reduzir as emissões de gases do efeito estufa exige que consideremos a energia nuclear com todas as suas possibilidades. Os fatos básicos da tecnologia - bons e maus - devem ser confrontados.
Expandir a oferta de energia elétrica e simultaneamente reduzir os efeitos das mudanças climáticas é o desafio que se apresenta aos formuladores de políticas energéticas. A substituição de 137 reatores nucleares em término de vida útil, nos próximos 20 anos, quer por outros nucleares, quer por outras fontes energéticas, é uma questão que exigirá investimentos muito expressivos de todos os países envolvidos.
Os fatores geopolíticos que envolvem o suprimento de energia também não podem ser descartados e em muitos casos a energia nuclear é a única opção para garantir maior segurança nacional de suprimento e diminuição da exposição em relação à volatilidade do preço do petróleo e à importação de combustíveis.
Em dezembro de 2015, o acordo de Paris consolidou anos de negociações com um acordo entre 188 países para limitar as emissões de dióxido de carbono. Muitos países estão impulsionando ativamente o crescimento de seus planos de produção de energia nuclear para fazer frente aos compromissos que assumiram quanto às mudanças climáticas.
Apesar do grande número de países emergentes em energia nuclear, eles não devem contribuir muito para a expansão da capacidade nuclear no futuro previsível - o principal crescimento virá em países onde a tecnologia já está bem estabelecida, principalmente na Ásia. No entanto, a longo prazo, a tendência de urbanização em países menos desenvolvidos vai aumentar muito a demanda por eletricidade, especialmente, a fornecida por centrais geração de energia de base, como nuclear.
A disponibilidade de novas tecnologias e o progresso realizado para desenvolver sites que sejam publicamente aceitáveis, leva à construção de novas instalações nucleares. A energia nuclear tem vantagens ambientais distintas sobre os combustíveis fósseis, podendo conter e gerenciar virtualmente todos os seus resíduos sem causar qualquer tipo de poluição não controlável.
Cabe lembrar que ao longo de décadas de uso pacífico da energia nuclear, jamais houve desvio de urânio para uso militar. A energia nuclear civil não tem sido a causa ou a rota para armas nucleares em qualquer país que tenha arsenal nuclear.
BRASIL NOS BRICS: capítulo 5 - ENERGIA NUCLEAR NOS BRICSLeonam Guimarães
É inequívoca a importância estratégica de o Brasil se manter ativo na exploração dos usos pacíficos da energia nuclear, expandindo seu domínio tecnológico e capacidade industrial instalada nos diversos setores associados, como produção de radioisótopos para medicina e indústria, produção de combustível nuclear, propulsão nuclear naval e geração elétrica nuclear. Para isso, a cooperação dentro elos BRICS desponta como uma excelente oportunidade.
Estratégias de Aceitação Pública da Geração Elétrica NuclearLeonam Guimarães
Os países que embarcam em programas nucleares, geralmente têm fortes razões parafazê-lo, incluindo a falta de boas alternativas para satisfazer suas necessidades degeração de energia elétrica. Essas razões também podem incluir a confiança nasegurança das usinas nucleares existentes e, particularmente, a confiança em quetecnologias ainda mais seguras estarão em operação em breve. Na maioria dos casos,quando a opinião pública compreender as razões subjacentes para adotar a geraçãoelétrica nuclear, haverá apoio às decisões dos formuladores de políticas.
Programa da propulsão nuclear naval catalisador do desenvolvimento da tecnolo...Leonam Guimarães
João Roberto Loureiro de Mattos* e Leonam dos Santos Guimarães**
*Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN/SP
Av. Lineu Prestes 2.242 – Cidade Universitária
05508-000 São Paulo, SP, Brasil
**Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo - CTMSP
Av. Lineu Prestes 2.468
05508-900 Butantã, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
RESUMO
Constituindo-se em um dos maiores empreendimentos de desenvolvimento autóctone de
tecnologia já realizados no País, o programa de desenvolvimento da propulsão nuclear naval,
desenvolvido pela Marinha do Brasil através do Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo –
CTMSP, tem cumprido um importante papel de integração de competências técnicas e institucionais,
bem como a manutenção de massa crítica de pessoal ao longo das décadas de 80 e 90, onde a falta de
política clara para a área nuclear indicava um iminente desmonte do setor. O programa de
desenvolvimento da propulsão nuclear naval funciona como um agregador e catalisador de
competências num setor altamente competitivo e especializado como é o nuclear.
Este artigo apresenta os interesses do Brasil na sua fronteira marítima, a inserção da propulsão
nuclear naval neste contexto, a estratégia da Marinha do Brasil para obter este tipo de tecnologia, a
descrição do protótipo em terra – INAP, a situação atual deste empreendimento e o seu caráter de
integração no cenário nuclear brasileiro.
Wide margins of Wisconsin voters say that they want to see Wisconsin meet more of its energy needs through clean, renewable sources like wind, solar and bioenergy and energy efficiency, according to a recent bipartisan poll. They are also more likely to support candidates this who say they will promote more use of clean renewable energy like wind and solar power. The polling was conducted July 26 through Aug. 3 by a bipartisan research team comprised of Public Opinion Strategies (R) and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz and Associates (D). The margin of error is +/- 4.9 percent, with more than 400 Wisconsin voters representing a cross section of demographics including political affiliation, race, sex and locality. The polling was done was part of nonpartisan outreach efforts to broaden the conversation on energy issues between candidates and voters throughout the Midwest.
5 Barriers to and Solutions for Community Renewable Energy John Farrell
Community renewable energy has significant political and economic benefits, but is often hindered by five major barriers. This vividly illustrated presentation explains how communities can overcome the barriers and advance more local renewable energy.
ILSR Senior Researcher John Farrell gave this presentation as part of a Sustainable Economies Law Center webinar on April 30, 2013. You can view the presentation with audio at http://youtu.be/3dCcqIEl5d4
Ipsos MORI research on public attitudes to the UK’s energy challengesIpsos UK
The British public are now far more concerned by energy security than climate change compared with people around the world. There is recognition we need a diverse mix of energy sources to meet needs, including support for nuclear. However, consumers themselves are still wedded to gas, and have limited awareness of alternative options. Ben Page gave this presentation to Madano Partnership's breakfast briefing on the UK’s evolving energy policy: Opportunties and Challenges on 25 April 2013.
Public Rooftop Revolution: Putting the Solar Shine on City BuildingsJohn Farrell
There are many stories on residential rooftop solar but few on what cities are doing to make themselves energy self-reliant by using their own buildings and lands to generate power.
In Public Rooftop Revolution, ILSR estimates that mid-sized cities could install as much as 5,000 megawatts of solar—as much as one-quarter of all solar installed in the U.S. to date—on municipal property, with little to no upfront cash. It would allow cities to redirect millions in saved energy costs to other public purposes.
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEdelman_UK
The UK energy sector results from the 2014 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The annual Trust Barometer is the largest study of its kind, and explores rising and falling levels of trust across twenty-seven markets, and 33,000 people; considering different industry sectors; as well as the impact and perception of government, business, media and society
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman
The Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions research shows that even while people’s exposure to natural gas news trends positive, the intensity of any support is very soft—and the window is closing.
GTM Research Senior Analyst Cory Honeyman on the State and Future of the U.S. Solar Market.
Presentation from Solar Power International, September 2015
Potential Fault Lines Under the Utility’s Customer StrategyCindy Rogers
The Annual State of the Customer Survey tests the most basic assumptions underpinning the customer strategy of energy utilities. We found that most customers believe utilities provide good customer service. Most customers value their utility over other service providers.
We also asked questions about new offerings, such as residential solar energy and electric vehicles. We explored the level of customer trust in utilities. We identified growing fault lines beneath the utility, especially with investor-owned utilities. We determined that the assumptions around reliability, equity, and ownership may be outdated. Like all fault lines, it is necessary to dig to see them. In this case, we began to ask the tough questions of consumers to get their input
Altman Vilandrie & Co. 2013 Consumer Video Research ExcerptsWill Richmond
These are key findings from Altman Vilandrie & Co's 2013 Consumer Video Research showcasing online video viewing adoption, attitudes toward pay-TV and cord-cutting, and millennials' use of broadcast TV.
2015 Trends in Public Service AnnouncementsJulia McDowell
If you're thinking of creating or distributing public service announcements, don't miss this annual report. We'll answer your questions about distribution, time-sensitive messages and PSA inventory.
On July 26, 2013 The Solar Foundation, through the support of the DOE Solar Outreach Partnership, participated in a panel on sustainable schools and presented ways to deploy solar energy on schools around the nation at the 2013 National Convening of the Young Elected Officials.
Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie WellsRosie Wells
Insight: In a landscape where traditional narrative structures are giving way to fragmented and non-linear forms of storytelling, there lies immense potential for creativity and exploration.
'Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity' is a micro report from Rosie Wells.
Rosie Wells is an Arts & Cultural Strategist uniquely positioned at the intersection of grassroots and mainstream storytelling.
Their work is focused on developing meaningful and lasting connections that can drive social change.
Please download this presentation to enjoy the hyperlinks!
This presentation, created by Syed Faiz ul Hassan, explores the profound influence of media on public perception and behavior. It delves into the evolution of media from oral traditions to modern digital and social media platforms. Key topics include the role of media in information propagation, socialization, crisis awareness, globalization, and education. The presentation also examines media influence through agenda setting, propaganda, and manipulative techniques used by advertisers and marketers. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of surveillance enabled by media technologies on personal behavior and preferences. Through this comprehensive overview, the presentation aims to shed light on how media shapes collective consciousness and public opinion.
Mastering the Concepts Tested in the Databricks Certified Data Engineer Assoc...SkillCertProExams
• For a full set of 760+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/databricks-certified-data-engineer-associate-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
1. 6th Biennial National Survey of
U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors
Summer 2015
Ann S. Bisconti, PhD
Bisconti Research, Inc.
ann@bisconti.com
2. 6th Biennial National Survey of
U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors
• May 26 through June 13, 2015
• Full-time residents within 10-mile radius of U.S.
nuclear power plant sites
• Excluded households with people who work at a
nuclear power plant
• 60 sites X 18 = 1,080 total interviews
• Margin of error +/- 3%
• Interview 15-18 minutes
• Phone interviews (80% landline, 20% cell)
2
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
3. Member Service: Plant Neighbor
Benchmark Reports
• NEI members added interviews in the 10-mile
radius of 22 nuclear power plant sites.
• Objective: compare attitudes of the plant’s
neighbors with attitudes nationally, in the
region, and at sites with similar population
density.
3
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
4. 4
Topics Covered in the Survey and Report
• Attitudes toward nuclear energy
• Branding metrics
• Impressions of plant and perceived community opinion
• New reactor acceptability
• Plant impact on local economy and jobs
• Plant safety and environmental protection
• Plant community involvement
• Radiation
• Waste management
• Messages for using nuclear energy
• How well informed on topics and how likely to seek information
• Information sources used and rated
• Energy education center visits and impact
• Emergency communications
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
5. 5
Plant Neighbors More Favorable to
Nuclear Energy Than the General Public
9 168
14
33 42
50 27
Plant Neighbors
June 2015
General Public
March 2015
16
30
83
68
Strongly favor
Somewhat favor
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Overall, do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose the
use of nuclear energy as one of the ways to provide electricity in the United States? (%)
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
6. Plant Neighbors’ Favorable Impression of
Nearby Nuclear Power Plant Continues
6
Thinking of the nuclear power plant closest to where you live, would you describe your
general impression of this plant and the way it has operated recently as very favorable,
somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable?
57
50
59
63
57
60
32
30
27
27
29
27
6
8
7
6
7
7
4
4
4
3
4
3
1
2
1
1
3
3
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable
Very unfavorable Don't know
Total
Favorable
87
86
90
86
86
89
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
7. All Subgroups Have Favorable Impression of
Nearby Nuclear Power Plant
7
Thinking of the nuclear power plant closest to where you live, would you describe your
general impression of this plant and the way it has operated recently as very favorable,
somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable?
59
54
58
53
63
30
34
35
35
28
7
6
4
7
6
3
5
2
4
3
1
1
1
1
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Age: 55+
Age: 35-54
Age: 18-34
Women
Men
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable
Very unfavorable Don't know
Total
Favorable
91
88
93
89
89
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
8. 8
Favorable Impression of Nearby Plant
Strongest Outside Northeast
Thinking of the nuclear power plant closest to where you live, would you describe your
general impression of this plant and the way it has operated recently as very favorable,
somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, or very unfavorable?
61
64
58
62
48
27
27
34
29
35
7
5
5
6
10
5
5
3
2
6
1
1
2
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
New plant interest sites
West
South
Midwest
Northeast
Very favorable Somewhat favorable Somewhat unfavorable
Very unfavorable Don't know
Total
Favorable
83
91
92
91
88
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
9. 69% View Adding a New Reactor
At Nearby Plant Site as Acceptable
9
If a new power plant were needed to supply electricity, would it be acceptable to you or
not acceptable to you to add a new nuclear reactor at the site of the nearest nuclear
power plant?
69%
28%
2%Not acceptable
Don’t know
Acceptable
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
10. 10
New Reactor Acceptable to Majorities of
Women, Men, and All Age Groups
If a new power plant were needed to supply electricity, would it be acceptable to you or
not acceptable to you to add a new nuclear reactor at the site of the nearest nuclear
power plant?
70
69
69
62
78
27
30
29
34
21
3
1
2
4
1
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Age: 55+
Age: 35-54
Age: 18-34
Women
Men
Acceptable Not acceptable Don't know
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
11. New Reactor Most Acceptable Outside Northeast
11
If a new power plant were needed to supply electricity, would it be acceptable to you or
not acceptable to you to add a new nuclear reactor at the site of the nearest nuclear
power plant?
70
79
73
69
58
28
19
24
28
40
2
2
3
3
2
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
New plant interest sites
West
South
Midwest
Northeast
Acceptable Not acceptable Don't know
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
12. Most Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Rate
Nearby Plant Safe
12
Still thinking about the nuclear power plant that is nearest to where you live, how safe do
you regard this plant? Please think of a scale from "1" to "7," where "1" means very
unsafe and "7" means very safe. The safer you think it is, the higher the number you
would give.
39%
26%
18%
8%
3%
2%
3%
0%
(Very safe) 7
6
5
(Middle) 4
3
2
(Very unsafe) 1
Don't know
83
9
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
13. High Confidence in the Company:
Safety and Environmental Protection
13
Now, I’d like to ask you about the company that operates the nuclear power plant nearest
to you. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or
strongly disagree with the following statements about this company.
50
51
58
32
32
32
7
7
4
7
6
4
4
4
2
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
I am confident that the company has
prepared the plant to withstand the most
severe natural events that may occur in
this region
This company is doing a good job of
protecting the environment
I am confident in this company’s ability to
operate a nuclear power plant safely
Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree Don't know
Total
Agree
90
83
82
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
14. Favorable Opinions on Plant’s Impact on
Economy/Jobs and Community Involvement
14
Now, I’d like to ask you about the company that operates the nuclear power plant nearest
to you. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or
strongly disagree with the following statements about this company.
49
61
65
33
28
24
7
4
4
5
3
5
7
3
2
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
This company is involved in the
community
There are good jobs for local people at
the plant and in local businesses that
provide services to the plant
The plant helps the local economy
Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree Don't know
Total
Agree
89
89
81
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
15. Messages for Using Nuclear Energy
In this Area Still Viewed Favorably
15
Please tell me if each of the following points is an excellent, good, fair, or poor reason to
use nuclear energy in this area. How about...
46
54
54
55
56
28
28
28
27
25
Jobs and economic
growth
Multi-layered back-up
safety
Reliability and clean air
NRC monitors daily, will
shut down
Made in America
Excellent Good Excellent
& Good
81
82
82
82
75
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
16. Plant Neighbors Feel Quite Well Informed,
Some Gaps
16
Do you feel very well informed, somewhat well informed, not too well informed, or not
well informed at all about the following topics?
12
26
35
37
42
50
27
36
46
48
45
33
26
20
12
11
8
9
32
17
7
4
5
8
3
2
1
1
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
New smaller nuclear power plant
designs
How nuclear waste is stored
Nuclear power plant safety features
Nuclear energy
The nuclear power plant nearest to
where you live
First thing to do in case of emergency at
nearest plant
Very informed Somewhat informed Not too informed
Not at all informed Don't know
Total
Informed
83
87
84
81
61
39
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
17. Plant Sources Most Credible for Information
About Nuclear Energy
17
Please tell me if you think each of the following would be an excellent, good, fair, or poor
source of accurate and reliable information about nuclear energy.
7
12
13
14
29
32
32
38
39
15
17
27
29
39
31
34
38
34
21
20
29
27
22
16
18
15
14
52
44
29
27
9
12
13
9
10
5
7
2
3
1
10
4
1
4
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Antinuclear groups
Social media (Twitter, YouTube or Facebook)
Your local elected officials
Environmental groups
Local news media
People you know who work at your local plant
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Booklets or brochures from local plant
Safety, radiation, or environmental experts at local plant
Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know
Excellent
& Good
72
75
65
62
68
42
40
29
22
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
18. Index of Favorability to Nuclear Energy:
Plant Neighbors and General Public
18
76
82
73
91
72
59
90
66
83
Agree spent fuel rods managed safely
Rate nuclear power plants safe
Support building new plants
Support license renewal
Associate "a lot" with reliability
Associate "a lot" with clean air
Believe nuclear will be important
Believe public favors nuclear energy
Favor nuclear energy
65
64
62
86
55
51
78
33
68
INDEX SCORE 76.9 62.4
Plant Neighbors: Summer 2015 General Public: Spring 2015
Source: Bisconti Research Inc. national surveys of public opinion, Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.. Nationally representative samples of 1,000
U.S. adults interviewed by telephone, most recently both landline and cell phone, margin of error plus or minus three percentage points.
*This measure was obtained in a separate survey conducted March 16-22, 2015.
*
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015
19. Observations
19
• Plant neighbors (on average across all U.S. sites)
continue to show extraordinary support for nuclear
energy and the nearby plant.
• This support is essentially unchanged over a decade.
• Support is grounded in favorable perceptions of the
plant’s safety, environmental protection,
contribution to jobs and the economy, and outreach.
• Plant neighbors feel quite well informed and give
highest trust to information from plant sources.
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors 2015