Aptopadesha Pramana / Pariksha: The Verbal Testimony
ANZICS S&Q 2014 - Abstract Presentation: Singh on After-hours vs in-hours MET calls
1. Manoj Y Singh MD, IDCC, FNB, EDIC, FCICM
Department of Intensive Care Lecturer,
The Canberra Hospital, Australia The Australian National University
Email: Manoj.Singh@act.gov.au
Twitter: @Drmanoj_s
Scott L, Mitchel I, Rai S, TCH Outreach Team
Are after-hours Medical
emergency systems any
different to work-hours METs
3. Introduction
• Post inception of the RRS
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
• 2002–2008 period, RRS
hospital
• >50% lower IHCA
rate,
• 40% lower IHCA-
related mortality,
• 6% lower overall
hospital mortality.
Chen J et al Resuscitation June 2014Crit Care Med 2010; 38:445–450
4. IHCA rate/mortality plateaued?
Impact of RRS in Australia
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
Chen J et al Resuscitation June 2014
22%22%
11%
No difference in outcomes & 1-year post-discharge mortality
5. Reasons?
• Burden!!!
– In 2009, RRT
• 18800 calls
• At any hour 2/27 hosp ls/hour
– This rate is on the
rise
• >700% rise !!!
• Non preventable
events/factors
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
Crit Care Resusc 2013; 15: 273–278
6. IHCA mortality
• Modifiable factors
– Science of resuscitation & after-care
– Early recognition of deteriorating pts
• Missed MET opportunities
– Better EOL planning
– Fewer multiple METs/ review calls
– Improved skill mix of hospital staff
– Better after-hours care in the hospital
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
8. The issue with After-hours!
• Staff numbers and skill mix
• Lack of supervision
– Run mainly by JMOs
• Lack of care coordination
• Poor multidisciplinary communication
The hospital sleeps but the diseases don’t !!!
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
9. Study Aim
• Whether after-hours MET calls any
different to the work-hours MET calls?
– Primary outcome
• Compare all-cause in-hospital mortality
– Secondary outcomes
• Hourly variations in number of METs
• Hourly variations in in-hospital mortality
depending on the time of their first MET
• Hourly variations in MET triggers
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
10. Methodology
• Retrospective study
– Inclusion criteria
• All adult pts who had MET calls recorded at the
Canberra hospital (TCH) between 1st January
2012 to 31st June 2013
• Used MET database to get the data
– TCH a 600 bedded tertiary referral & trauma
center & university teaching hospital
• 22 bedded ICU unit
• 69,000 separations in 2012 & 73,821 in 2013
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
12. Methodology
• After-hours MET definition
– No standard definition proposed in literature
– We aimed to compare the two cohorts with an
after-hour definition of
(A) 18:00-05:59 hours (based on ANZICS
after-
hour discharge from ICU)
&
(B)18:00-07:59 hours (based on our hospital
working hours)
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
13. Methodology
• Exclusion criteria
–All METs in people
• Age<16 years,
• Not in-patients (staff, visitors etc),
• METs in Mental health unit
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
14. Methodology
• Statistics
– To calculate all cause in-hospital mortality
• We assigned patients into the two cohorts
depending on their time of their first MET
call
• Expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95%
CI (fisher exact test)
• A p value <0.05 was considered statistically
significant
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
15. Results
• 2487 MET episodes were recorded during
study period
• 539 were excluded
• 1948 MET call episodes included in study
– 1573 patients (55.1% males) accounted for
the above
• Majority (82.13%) were attended by a
dedicated Outreach team
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
16. Results
• 284 (18.01%) pts had multiple MET calls
during their hospital stay
• 115 (7.31%) pts had multiple METs within
24 hours period
• 77(4.8%) patients were made NFR during
their first MET
• 167(10.6%) patients had preexisting NFR
prior to MET
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
17. Results
• After-hour MET calls
– Definition A (17:59-05:59 hrs): 836 (42.91%)
– Definition B (17:59-07:59 hrs): 996 (51.12%)
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
24. Results
• All cause in-hospital mortality (A)
– 21.81% (142/651) for “after-hours”
– 18.16% (160/881) “work-hours”
• OR 1.25, CI 0.97-1.61, p value 0.07
• All cause in-hospital mortality (B)
– 22.69% (175/771) for “after-hours”
– 18.26% (139/761) “work-hours”
• OR 1.31, CI 1.02-1.68, p value 0.031
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
25. Results
• Mortality during at their first MET call
– 2.25% (15/666) for “after-hours”
– 2.87% (26/907) for “work-hours”
• OR 0.78, CI 0.41-1.48, p value 0.45
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
36. Study limitations
• Retrospective cohort study
• Impact of staffing ratios & skill mix in the
two cohorts
• Effect of many other co-variates
• Effect on multiple METs on outcome
• Cross over effects of subsequent METs
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
37. Study limitations
• Effect of limitation of medical treatment on
the overall in-hospital mortality
– LOMT set prior/at/after METs
• We are looking into this in our extended
review
– LOMT revoked = ?delay in treatment
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 1268–1274
38. Study Strengths
• Only few studies have looked at the hourly
variations of METs
– compared hourly variation of in-hospital
mortality depending on the time of MET
– Most studies- cardiac arrest variations
• It may give some insight to
– Variations in MET trigger patterns each hour
– Possible areas of improvement
– Possible using after-hour METs as KPI
• Generated further research questions
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
39. Conclusions
• After-hours MET calls had increased in-
hospital mortality risk
• There is a difference in the way MET is
triggered in after-hours than work-hours
• There may be a potential to decrease in-
hospital deterioration related mortality
further
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
42. Lessons learnt
• Study raises further questions on the
impact of after-hours hospital care on in-
hospital mortality
• Stimulus for further research
– Patients with limitation of care excluded
– Influence of disease, chronic illness, age etc
on mortality
– Experience of the skill-mix of staff at MET
outcome
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
58. Methodology
• RRS/MET team
• First responders Second responders
• Outreach registrar
• Outreach nurse
• Outreach SRMO Forth responders
• +/- ICU SR
• +/- ICU consultant
Third responders
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
• ICU registrar/SR
• Outreach nurse
• ICU registrar
• ICU access nurse
• ED registrar +/- ED consultant
• ED nurse / Outreach nurse
59. Results
• Median duration of MET call during after-
hours was not significantly different to
work-hours MET calls
– Median 60 vs. 58 minutes
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
61. Lessons learnt
• In-hospital mortality post MET can be
further decreased but requires early
recognition of a deteriorating patient
• We can staff the RRT resources
depending on the MET patterns at your
hospital
– ?More staff in the evening
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
63. Study limitations
• Effect of limitation of medical treatment
– LOMT set prior/at/after METs
– LOMT revoked = ?delay in treatment
AreAfter-hoursMETsanydifferenttoWork-hoursone?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 1268–1274
I would like to thank the organizers for allowing me to present my study at this conference.
Since the inception of the RRS- many hospitals are able to decrease the not only IHCA rates by 50%, Lower IHCA rate mortality by 40% and overall mortality by 6%
But this effect is somewhat getting plateaued, especially in hospitals which had a mature RRS since the inception compared to hospital who have accepted this system recently
The reasons for this is a big research question in itself
May be it the sear pressure of overload as some centers have experienced 700% rise in their METs
Or it may be because of certain non preventable factors/events
But there are still some modifiable risk factors which which can help us bring the mortality & morbidity of these IH related events
Within the first five years after the introduction of RRS we saw a increase in number after-hour METs
I feels this can be used as a KPI for after-hours care in the hospital
The issue of after-hours is huge- While more than half of the hospital sleeps the diseases don’t!!
So the main aim of the study was to compare after-hours MET vs work-hour METs
On literature review we found there was no standard definition of after-hours so we used the following two definitions
2487 MET episodes occurred during study period.
539 were excluded and thus
1948 mets ever included in study.
1573 pts accoundted for this mets.
18% had multiple mets, 7% had in first 24 hours.
4.8% pts were NFR at the time of first MET.
10% had preexisting NFR
While it was >50% by another which is a very significant finding!
This is the weekend distribution of the METs. METs peak on Thursdays.
Saturday more busier after-hours compared to Sunday
And if you break the after-hour METs further - most of the METs after triggered late evening rather than late night
The distribution of MET triggers was also interesting-
More worried calls and more cardiac arrest after-hours
While no surprises here that dec GCS more commonly picked up during the day
When I compared the All cause in-hospital mortality was not statistically significant by one definition but significant by another
This graph shows hourly variation in-hospital mortality each hour depending on the time of first MET
We can see the huge variation in the mortality each hour & over all between work & after-hours
This is even more significant when the working-hours are shrinked
Again cardiac arrest happen more afterhours more so in the early morning hours.
Worried calls are triggered more in the evenings and less at night
And come more from the surgical wards compared to medical wards
Hypotension were more called during work-hours
Tachypnea surprising was triggered more or less equally after-hours & work hours
Low GCS were more often triggered during the work hours and that too early morning hours
The effected of patients with limitation of care is huge on the mortality and cannot be neglected.
We are looking into this in our extended study and also in particular in patients where the limitations were revoked.
Effect on patients with Mortality is well known and some of these patients still get admitted to ICU
And these variations are similar to earlier published data from victoria, there is inverse relationship- “More METs less Cardiac arrest”
Comparing to the earlier studies there was no significant difference peak hours of met
RED Arrows (up)- nursing handover, GREEN arrows: Start-end and end medical shift, and
Pink arrows: routine nursing observations
Similar in this 1 month study across 7 centers
Anaesthesia and transferred to ward. 1.5 year data
Anaesthesia and transferred to ward. 1.5 year data
There was no difference in the median duration of METs in the two study grps
In the pre RRS era , “Code blue” was used to resuscitate patients in acute in-hospital events
42.91% METs occurred during after hours by one definition
And there are patients where their Limitations are revoked! And it would interesting to see that is the appropriate treatment delayed in these patients
And I feel needs to be studied prospectively!
And its meaningful association with mortality is difficult to interpret