47_Kothari _Commission - PPT.pptxbsbdbjsnsbsbs sbs dbdbdbdbdbdbdbndjdjd
1.
KOTHARI COMMISION
Presented by
Dr.P. SUBRAMANIAN
Assistant Professor
Department of Educational Planning and Administration
Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University
Karapakkam, Chennai – 600 097.
2.
INTRODUCTION
The National EducationCommission was
appointed in 1964 and it reported in 1966.
Its chairman was Dr. D. S. Kothari,
Chairman, University Grants Commission.
The terms of reference were to advice
government on national pattern of
education and on the general principles
and policies for the development of
education at all stages and all its aspects.
3.
SALIENT FEATURES OF
KOTHARICOMMISSION
The recommendations laid down aims of
education – economic, political, emotional,
social, scientific, and personal.
It recommended qualitative improvements and
quantitative expansion.
Educational pyramid was to be built from pre-
primary to the university levels.
4.
Professional preparationof teachers was
considered crucial to the qualitative
improvement of education.
Salary scales were fixed and improved.
Curriculum was laid down from pre-primary to
university stages.
New teaching methods were to be used.
5.
Guidance andcounseling were to be the
integral part of education.
Recommendations were made to ensure
equality in educational opportunities
between male and female population and
between advanced and backward sections of
society.
Work experience was recommended for
students at all levels.
6.
NATIONALAIMS
Education wasto be related to productivity and
national integration.
It was to strengthen social integration and
consolidate democracy as a form of government
and help the country to adopt it as a way of life.
It was to hasten the process of modernization.
It was to strive to build character by activation of
social, moral and spiritual values.
7.
STRUCTURE OF EDUCATION
•It was recommended that the educational pyramid
required division into stages and their
interrelationship,
• the duration of different stages,
• the quality of teachers,
• Curriculum,
• Methods of teaching and evaluation equipment
and building and utilization of available facilities.
8.
STRUCTURE OF PRIMARY
EDUCATION
•Pre-primary education – pre-primary, pre-basic,
kindergarten, Montessori.
• Primary education – class I to VII or I to VIII
which included lower primary classes (I – IV) or
(I to V) in some States, lower primary in some
other states and lower elementary still in some
states.
• Higher primary education – Classes V-VII or VI –
VIII.
9.
LOWER PRIMARY STAGE
(CLASSI – IV)
One language – the mother tongue or the
regional language
Mathematics
Study of environment (covering science and
social studies in class III or IV)
Creative activities
Work experience and social service
Health education
10.
HIGHER PRIMARY STAGE
(CLASSV-VIII)
Two languages
Mother tongue or the regional language
Hindi or English
A third language (English, Hindi, or the regional language)
might be studied on an optional basis.
Mathematics
Science
Social studies
Art or craft
Work experience
Physical education
Education in moral and spiritual values
11.
LOWER SECONDARY STAGE
(CLASSIX- X)
Three languages
Mathematics
Science
History, geography and civics
Art and craft
Work experience and social service
Physical education
Education in moral and spiritual values
12.
HIGHER SECONDARY STAGE
(CLASSXI – XII)
Any two languages,
including any modern Indian
language, any modern
foreign language and any
classical language
An additional language
History
Geography
Economics
Logic
Psychology
Sociology
Art
Physics
Chemistry
Mathematics
Biology
Geology
Home science
Work experience and social
services
Physical education
Art or craft
Education in moral and
spiritual values.
13.
The commissionrecommended that tuition fees at
the primary level were to be abolished.
Lower secondary education was to be free before
the end of the fifth plan.
At primary level, free text books and working
material were to be provided.
At the primary stage, scholarships were to be
awarded to a needy child
14.
Education forthe scheduled castes was to
be expanded.
Bold and determined efforts were to be
made for the education of women.
Work experience might be considered an
innovation of the commission.
15.
CONCLUSION
The commission recommendedfewer
holidays, increase in working hours, decrease in
examination days, and home work in long holidays
and self study by using libraries, reading rooms,
laboratories and workshops etc.
16.
REFERENCES
Dutt, B.& Garg, Jyoti. (2012). Educational
Planning and administration. New Delhi: Global
Publications.
Mathur, S. S. (1990). Educational administration
and management. India: The Indian Publications.
Ministry of Education. (1966). Report of the
education commission (1964-66): Education and
national development. New Delhi: Govt. of India.