Basel III is an international regulatory accord that introduced a series of reforms to regulate banks' capital adequacy and stress testing. It was implemented in response to the deficiencies exposed by the global financial crisis. The key changes introduced by Basel III include stronger capital and liquidity requirements, a leverage ratio to monitor financial leverage, and measures to promote the build-up of capital buffers. Basel III aims to improve the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks from financial and economic stress and reduce risks.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It outlines Basel I, introduced in 1988, which focused on credit risk. Basel II, introduced in 2004, takes a three pillar approach focusing on minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive. Some benefits of Basel II include improved risk management and efficiency, while challenges include lack of historical data and difficulty accounting for diversity across countries.
Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
The Three Pillars of the Basel II AccordNahid Anjum
The three pillars of the Basel II accord establish standards for how much capital banks need to hold against risks. The first pillar deals with calculating regulatory capital requirements for credit, operational, and market risk. The second pillar provides a framework for banks to review their risk management systems and assess internal capital adequacy. The third pillar aims to complement the minimum capital requirements by requiring banks to disclose information allowing markets to assess their capital adequacy.
Basel II is an international standard that establishes capital requirements for banks to guard against financial and operational risks. It consists of three pillars: minimum capital requirements to cover credit, market and operational risks; supervisory review to ensure adequate capital to cover all risks; and market discipline through disclosure requirements. While Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive, Indian banks face challenges in implementing it due to lack of risk management expertise, need for technology investments, and restructuring of non-performing assets. A gradual implementation process will help ensure a smooth transition to the new framework.
Basel III is a global regulatory standard that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. It was implemented in response to deficiencies in the previous Basel II framework that were exposed by the global financial crisis. The goals of Basel III include improving the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks, reducing systemic risk, and increasing transparency. It establishes stricter capital standards, introduces capital buffers, and imposes new liquidity measures including the liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio.
SoSeBa Bank - Risk Managment of a fictitious BankAlliochah Gavyn
The document discusses risk management at SoSeBa Bank in Mauritius. It introduces the bank and outlines its mission to provide banking services to the working class population. It then discusses key risks like credit, liquidity, and market risk that the bank needs to measure and manage. It provides an overview of banking regulations in Mauritius as well as international standards like the Basel Accords. The document emphasizes the importance of robust risk management practices like risk modeling, exposure limits, and stress testing for the long-term success of the new bank.
The document discusses the Basel II Accords, which establish international standards for banking regulations and capital requirements. Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by measuring credit, operational, and market risks. It introduces a three pillar framework: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital standards; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. Implementation of Basel II varies by country and bank sophistication in risk measurement. The overall goal is a safer, more stable global banking system.
Basel III is an international regulatory accord that introduced a series of reforms to regulate banks' capital adequacy and stress testing. It was implemented in response to the deficiencies exposed by the global financial crisis. The key changes introduced by Basel III include stronger capital and liquidity requirements, a leverage ratio to monitor financial leverage, and measures to promote the build-up of capital buffers. Basel III aims to improve the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks from financial and economic stress and reduce risks.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It outlines Basel I, introduced in 1988, which focused on credit risk. Basel II, introduced in 2004, takes a three pillar approach focusing on minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive. Some benefits of Basel II include improved risk management and efficiency, while challenges include lack of historical data and difficulty accounting for diversity across countries.
Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
The Three Pillars of the Basel II AccordNahid Anjum
The three pillars of the Basel II accord establish standards for how much capital banks need to hold against risks. The first pillar deals with calculating regulatory capital requirements for credit, operational, and market risk. The second pillar provides a framework for banks to review their risk management systems and assess internal capital adequacy. The third pillar aims to complement the minimum capital requirements by requiring banks to disclose information allowing markets to assess their capital adequacy.
Basel II is an international standard that establishes capital requirements for banks to guard against financial and operational risks. It consists of three pillars: minimum capital requirements to cover credit, market and operational risks; supervisory review to ensure adequate capital to cover all risks; and market discipline through disclosure requirements. While Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive, Indian banks face challenges in implementing it due to lack of risk management expertise, need for technology investments, and restructuring of non-performing assets. A gradual implementation process will help ensure a smooth transition to the new framework.
Basel III is a global regulatory standard that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduce new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and leverage. It was implemented in response to deficiencies in the previous Basel II framework that were exposed by the global financial crisis. The goals of Basel III include improving the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks, reducing systemic risk, and increasing transparency. It establishes stricter capital standards, introduces capital buffers, and imposes new liquidity measures including the liquidity coverage ratio and net stable funding ratio.
SoSeBa Bank - Risk Managment of a fictitious BankAlliochah Gavyn
The document discusses risk management at SoSeBa Bank in Mauritius. It introduces the bank and outlines its mission to provide banking services to the working class population. It then discusses key risks like credit, liquidity, and market risk that the bank needs to measure and manage. It provides an overview of banking regulations in Mauritius as well as international standards like the Basel Accords. The document emphasizes the importance of robust risk management practices like risk modeling, exposure limits, and stress testing for the long-term success of the new bank.
The document discusses the Basel II Accords, which establish international standards for banking regulations and capital requirements. Basel II aims to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by measuring credit, operational, and market risks. It introduces a three pillar framework: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital standards; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. Implementation of Basel II varies by country and bank sophistication in risk measurement. The overall goal is a safer, more stable global banking system.
The document then discusses the key aspects of Basel I and Basel II accords. Basel I, introduced in 1998, required banks to hold capital equal to at least 8% of total assets, measured according to their riskiness across four buckets (0%, 20%, 50%, 100%). Basel II, published in 2004, consists of three pillars - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It introduced a risk
The document discusses the evolution of the Basel Accords from 1988 to the present. It highlights that:
1) Basel I, adopted in 1988, aimed to strengthen bank stability and create equal competition. However, it only considered credit risk and encouraged regulatory arbitrage.
2) Basel II, introduced in 2004, aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by incorporating banks' internal risk management. It included three pillars for minimum capital, supervisory review, and market discipline.
3) While Basel III, finalized in 2010 after the financial crisis, aims to mitigate past damage, the results of its stricter capital standards are still to be seen as countries implement its guidelines.
The document outlines the objectives and framework of Pillar II of the New Capital Accord. Pillar II aims to ensure banks have adequate capital to support all risks and encourages better risk management. It involves banks developing internal capital assessment processes and targets. Supervisors evaluate how well banks assess their capital needs relative to risks and intervene when needed. The roles of bank management and supervisors are discussed in establishing risk management practices and monitoring capital levels and risks.
The Basel Committee was formed by central bank governors of G10 countries to enhance banking supervision worldwide. It is best known for its capital adequacy standards. Basel I (1988) focused on credit risk capital requirements. Basel II (2004) added operational risk and market risk requirements, and introduced three pillars for minimum capital standards, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III (2010) was introduced after the 2008 crisis to strengthen banks' capital reserves and introduce leverage ratios and liquidity requirements to improve financial stability. The three pillars of Basel II were retained in Basel III to balance bank stability and transparency.
Basel II is an international banking standard that recommends regulations for how much capital banks must hold. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive by aligning them with banks' financial and operational risks. The three pillars of Basel II are: 1) Minimum capital requirements based on credit, market, and operational risk; 2) Supervisory review of risk profiles and capital adequacy; 3) Market discipline through disclosure and transparency. Implementing Basel II poses challenges for Indian banks like additional capital requirements and favoring large banks with stronger risk management.
Risk management in banking sector project report mba financeBabasab Patil
This document discusses risk management in the banking sector. It introduces the concepts of risk management and provides definitions of key risk types including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and regulatory risk. It also summarizes Basel II, the international banking accord that introduced a risk-based capital adequacy framework. The framework has three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Effective risk management and maintaining adequate capital are important for banking stability and soundness.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector. It describes the key aspects of Basel I, issued in 1988, and Basel II, issued in 2004. Basel II built on Basel I by establishing three pillars: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. The overall goal was to better align regulatory capital with risks and encourage sound risk management practices.
Basel III is a global regulatory framework that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduces new regulations on bank liquidity and leverage. It seeks to raise the quality of capital held by banks and strengthen their ability to absorb losses. The document outlines the key components of Basel III, including higher capital requirements, a new leverage ratio, and liquidity standards. It also discusses the potential macroeconomic impact and advantages of Basel III, as well as country-level implementations like in the US.
Basel norms and bcci scam and international bankingGulshan Poddar
The document discusses regulation of international banking and the Basel Committee. The Basel Committee was formed in 1974 to enhance supervision of international banks and close gaps in supervision. It works to set standards but has no legal authority. Its members include major countries. The committee aims to ensure no bank escapes supervision and supervision is adequate. It issued core banking principles in 1997. Basel III was agreed in 2010-2011 to strengthen bank capital, liquidity, and decrease leverage in response to the financial crisis.
The Basel Committee was established in 1974 by central bank governors in response to bank failures caused by foreign exchange losses. It aims to improve banking supervision and financial stability. Basel I established the first capital adequacy framework in 1988, requiring an 8% capital ratio. Basel II, released in 2004, built on this with 3 pillars addressing minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III, finalized in 2017 after the financial crisis, further strengthened regulations around capital, leverage, and liquidity to promote a more resilient banking system.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was created in 1974 by central bank governors of Group of Ten nations. It meets four times a year at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. The Basel I Accord of 1988 aimed to strengthen banking stability and consistency. It assigned risk weights to asset classes from 0% to 100%. Basel II, created in response to Basel I limitations, introduced three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Pillar 1 separates credit and operational risk. Pillar 2 covers banks' risk assessments and supervisory review. Pillar 3 mandates risk disclosures. The RBI implemented Basel I in 1993 and Basel II in 2007 for Indian banks, using standardized approaches
The document discusses the implementation of Basel I and II capital adequacy norms by Indian banks. It provides background on the Basel Committee and an overview of the key aspects of Basel I, including the capital requirements and risk weighting of assets. It then summarizes the pillars of Basel II - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline - and highlights some of the pitfalls of both frameworks. The document concludes by noting the challenges faced by the Indian banking industry in implementing the new capital standards.
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel accords. It provides background on the Basel Committee, describing how it was established in 1974 and its goal of strengthening banking regulations internationally. It then summarizes the key aspects of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III, including their capital requirements, risk categorizations, and goals of improving risk management and financial stability. The summaries highlight how each accord built upon the previous one by incorporating additional risk types and making requirements more risk-sensitive.
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
The document discusses Basel, an international banking standards organization. It provides background on Basel I and II, which established minimum capital requirements and risk management standards for banks. Basel II had three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III was then introduced after the 2008 financial crisis to strengthen regulations with stricter capital and liquidity standards, as well as additional buffers to improve banks' ability to withstand financial stress.
The Basel Accords are a series of banking regulations established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The document discusses the history and objectives of the Basel Accords. It explains that the Basel Committee was established in 1974 to improve banking supervision globally and set minimum capital requirements for banks. The Basel I Accord established the first capital requirements in 1988. Subsequent accords like Basel II and III enhanced regulations around capital adequacy ratios, risk management, disclosure, and liquidity to promote global financial stability.
Basel II is an international standard that aims to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management within the banking sector. It improves upon Basel I by making capital requirements more risk sensitive and aligning regulatory capital more closely with underlying bank risks. Basel II consists of three pillars that cover minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Implementation of Basel II varies across countries and regulators but aims to modernize capital adequacy standards to be more comprehensive and risk sensitive.
Basel III is an international regulatory framework that introduced reforms to improve banking sector regulation and risk management. It consists of 3 pillars - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. The first pillar sets minimum capital requirements for credit, market and operational risk. It introduced capital buffers and distinguishes between Common Equity Tier 1, Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The second pillar aims to ensure banks effectively monitor institution-wide risks. The third pillar promotes market discipline through financial disclosures.
Basel II and III are international banking regulatory accords that establish capital requirements and risk management standards. Basel II, established in 1988, focused on credit risk but did not adequately address operational and market risk. Basel III, developed after the 2008 crisis, strengthened capital and liquidity requirements and introduced leverage and liquidity ratios. The Basel accords aim to ensure banks maintain adequate capital reserves to absorb losses and promote stable, risk-sensitive banking globally.
Vadhavan Port Development _ What to Expect In and Beyond (1).pdfjohnson100mee
The Vadhavan Port Development is poised to be one of the most significant infrastructure projects in India's maritime history. This deep-sea port, located in Maharashtra, promises to transform the region's economic landscape, bolster India's trade capabilities, and generate a plethora of employment opportunities. In this blog, we will delve into the various facets of the Vadhavan Port Development: what to expect in and beyond its completion, and how it stands to influence the future of India's maritime and economic sectors.
More Related Content
Similar to 3. The three Pillars of Basel II Accord.pptx
The document then discusses the key aspects of Basel I and Basel II accords. Basel I, introduced in 1998, required banks to hold capital equal to at least 8% of total assets, measured according to their riskiness across four buckets (0%, 20%, 50%, 100%). Basel II, published in 2004, consists of three pillars - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It introduced a risk
The document discusses the evolution of the Basel Accords from 1988 to the present. It highlights that:
1) Basel I, adopted in 1988, aimed to strengthen bank stability and create equal competition. However, it only considered credit risk and encouraged regulatory arbitrage.
2) Basel II, introduced in 2004, aimed to make capital requirements more risk-sensitive by incorporating banks' internal risk management. It included three pillars for minimum capital, supervisory review, and market discipline.
3) While Basel III, finalized in 2010 after the financial crisis, aims to mitigate past damage, the results of its stricter capital standards are still to be seen as countries implement its guidelines.
The document outlines the objectives and framework of Pillar II of the New Capital Accord. Pillar II aims to ensure banks have adequate capital to support all risks and encourages better risk management. It involves banks developing internal capital assessment processes and targets. Supervisors evaluate how well banks assess their capital needs relative to risks and intervene when needed. The roles of bank management and supervisors are discussed in establishing risk management practices and monitoring capital levels and risks.
The Basel Committee was formed by central bank governors of G10 countries to enhance banking supervision worldwide. It is best known for its capital adequacy standards. Basel I (1988) focused on credit risk capital requirements. Basel II (2004) added operational risk and market risk requirements, and introduced three pillars for minimum capital standards, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III (2010) was introduced after the 2008 crisis to strengthen banks' capital reserves and introduce leverage ratios and liquidity requirements to improve financial stability. The three pillars of Basel II were retained in Basel III to balance bank stability and transparency.
Basel II is an international banking standard that recommends regulations for how much capital banks must hold. It aims to make capital requirements more risk sensitive by aligning them with banks' financial and operational risks. The three pillars of Basel II are: 1) Minimum capital requirements based on credit, market, and operational risk; 2) Supervisory review of risk profiles and capital adequacy; 3) Market discipline through disclosure and transparency. Implementing Basel II poses challenges for Indian banks like additional capital requirements and favoring large banks with stronger risk management.
Risk management in banking sector project report mba financeBabasab Patil
This document discusses risk management in the banking sector. It introduces the concepts of risk management and provides definitions of key risk types including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and regulatory risk. It also summarizes Basel II, the international banking accord that introduced a risk-based capital adequacy framework. The framework has three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Effective risk management and maintaining adequate capital are important for banking stability and soundness.
The document discusses the Basel Accords, which are recommendations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector. It describes the key aspects of Basel I, issued in 1988, and Basel II, issued in 2004. Basel II built on Basel I by establishing three pillars: Pillar 1 sets minimum capital requirements; Pillar 2 establishes supervisory review; and Pillar 3 promotes market discipline through disclosure. The overall goal was to better align regulatory capital with risks and encourage sound risk management practices.
Basel III is a global regulatory framework that aims to strengthen bank capital requirements and introduces new regulations on bank liquidity and leverage. It seeks to raise the quality of capital held by banks and strengthen their ability to absorb losses. The document outlines the key components of Basel III, including higher capital requirements, a new leverage ratio, and liquidity standards. It also discusses the potential macroeconomic impact and advantages of Basel III, as well as country-level implementations like in the US.
Basel norms and bcci scam and international bankingGulshan Poddar
The document discusses regulation of international banking and the Basel Committee. The Basel Committee was formed in 1974 to enhance supervision of international banks and close gaps in supervision. It works to set standards but has no legal authority. Its members include major countries. The committee aims to ensure no bank escapes supervision and supervision is adequate. It issued core banking principles in 1997. Basel III was agreed in 2010-2011 to strengthen bank capital, liquidity, and decrease leverage in response to the financial crisis.
The Basel Committee was established in 1974 by central bank governors in response to bank failures caused by foreign exchange losses. It aims to improve banking supervision and financial stability. Basel I established the first capital adequacy framework in 1988, requiring an 8% capital ratio. Basel II, released in 2004, built on this with 3 pillars addressing minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III, finalized in 2017 after the financial crisis, further strengthened regulations around capital, leverage, and liquidity to promote a more resilient banking system.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was created in 1974 by central bank governors of Group of Ten nations. It meets four times a year at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. The Basel I Accord of 1988 aimed to strengthen banking stability and consistency. It assigned risk weights to asset classes from 0% to 100%. Basel II, created in response to Basel I limitations, introduced three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Pillar 1 separates credit and operational risk. Pillar 2 covers banks' risk assessments and supervisory review. Pillar 3 mandates risk disclosures. The RBI implemented Basel I in 1993 and Basel II in 2007 for Indian banks, using standardized approaches
The document discusses the implementation of Basel I and II capital adequacy norms by Indian banks. It provides background on the Basel Committee and an overview of the key aspects of Basel I, including the capital requirements and risk weighting of assets. It then summarizes the pillars of Basel II - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline - and highlights some of the pitfalls of both frameworks. The document concludes by noting the challenges faced by the Indian banking industry in implementing the new capital standards.
The document discusses the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Basel accords. It provides background on the Basel Committee, describing how it was established in 1974 and its goal of strengthening banking regulations internationally. It then summarizes the key aspects of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III, including their capital requirements, risk categorizations, and goals of improving risk management and financial stability. The summaries highlight how each accord built upon the previous one by incorporating additional risk types and making requirements more risk-sensitive.
Basel Accords - Basel I, II, and III Advantages, limitations and contrastSyed Ashraf Ali
The Basel Accords is referred to the banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking regulations). Basel I, Basel II and Basel III was issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They are called the Basel accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank for
International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of
recommendations for regulations in the banking industry.
The document discusses Basel, an international banking standards organization. It provides background on Basel I and II, which established minimum capital requirements and risk management standards for banks. Basel II had three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Basel III was then introduced after the 2008 financial crisis to strengthen regulations with stricter capital and liquidity standards, as well as additional buffers to improve banks' ability to withstand financial stress.
The Basel Accords are a series of banking regulations established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The document discusses the history and objectives of the Basel Accords. It explains that the Basel Committee was established in 1974 to improve banking supervision globally and set minimum capital requirements for banks. The Basel I Accord established the first capital requirements in 1988. Subsequent accords like Basel II and III enhanced regulations around capital adequacy ratios, risk management, disclosure, and liquidity to promote global financial stability.
Basel II is an international standard that aims to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management within the banking sector. It improves upon Basel I by making capital requirements more risk sensitive and aligning regulatory capital more closely with underlying bank risks. Basel II consists of three pillars that cover minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. Implementation of Basel II varies across countries and regulators but aims to modernize capital adequacy standards to be more comprehensive and risk sensitive.
Basel III is an international regulatory framework that introduced reforms to improve banking sector regulation and risk management. It consists of 3 pillars - minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. The first pillar sets minimum capital requirements for credit, market and operational risk. It introduced capital buffers and distinguishes between Common Equity Tier 1, Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The second pillar aims to ensure banks effectively monitor institution-wide risks. The third pillar promotes market discipline through financial disclosures.
Basel II and III are international banking regulatory accords that establish capital requirements and risk management standards. Basel II, established in 1988, focused on credit risk but did not adequately address operational and market risk. Basel III, developed after the 2008 crisis, strengthened capital and liquidity requirements and introduced leverage and liquidity ratios. The Basel accords aim to ensure banks maintain adequate capital reserves to absorb losses and promote stable, risk-sensitive banking globally.
Similar to 3. The three Pillars of Basel II Accord.pptx (20)
Vadhavan Port Development _ What to Expect In and Beyond (1).pdfjohnson100mee
The Vadhavan Port Development is poised to be one of the most significant infrastructure projects in India's maritime history. This deep-sea port, located in Maharashtra, promises to transform the region's economic landscape, bolster India's trade capabilities, and generate a plethora of employment opportunities. In this blog, we will delve into the various facets of the Vadhavan Port Development: what to expect in and beyond its completion, and how it stands to influence the future of India's maritime and economic sectors.
Navigating Your Financial Future: Comprehensive Planning with Mike Baumannmikebaumannfinancial
Learn how financial planner Mike Baumann helps individuals and families articulate their financial aspirations and develop tailored plans. This presentation delves into budgeting, investment strategies, retirement planning, tax optimization, and the importance of ongoing plan adjustments.
13 Jun 24 ILC Retirement Income Summit - slides.pptxILC- UK
ILC's Retirement Income Summit was hosted by M&G and supported by Canada Life. The event brought together key policymakers, influencers and experts to help identify policy priorities for the next Government and ensure more of us have access to a decent income in retirement.
Contributors included:
Jo Blanden, Professor in Economics, University of Surrey
Clive Bolton, CEO, Life Insurance M&G Plc
Jim Boyd, CEO, Equity Release Council
Molly Broome, Economist, Resolution Foundation
Nida Broughton, Co-Director of Economic Policy, Behavioural Insights Team
Jonathan Cribb, Associate Director and Head of Retirement, Savings, and Ageing, Institute for Fiscal Studies
Joanna Elson CBE, Chief Executive Officer, Independent Age
Tom Evans, Managing Director of Retirement, Canada Life
Steve Groves, Chair, Key Retirement Group
Tish Hanifan, Founder and Joint Chair of the Society of Later life Advisers
Sue Lewis, ILC Trustee
Siobhan Lough, Senior Consultant, Hymans Robertson
Mick McAteer, Co-Director, The Financial Inclusion Centre
Stuart McDonald MBE, Head of Longevity and Democratic Insights, LCP
Anusha Mittal, Managing Director, Individual Life and Pensions, M&G Life
Shelley Morris, Senior Project Manager, Living Pension, Living Wage Foundation
Sarah O'Grady, Journalist
Will Sherlock, Head of External Relations, M&G Plc
Daniela Silcock, Head of Policy Research, Pensions Policy Institute
David Sinclair, Chief Executive, ILC
Jordi Skilbeck, Senior Policy Advisor, Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association
Rt Hon Sir Stephen Timms, former Chair, Work & Pensions Committee
Nigel Waterson, ILC Trustee
Jackie Wells, Strategy and Policy Consultant, ILC Strategic Advisory Board
Poonawalla Fincorp’s Strategy to Achieve Industry-Leading NPA Metricsshruti1menon2
Poonawalla Fincorp Limited, under the leadership of Managing Director Abhay Bhutada, has achieved industry-leading Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPA) below 1% and Net Non-Performing Assets (NNPA) below 0.5% as of May 31, 2024. This success is attributed to a strategic vision focusing on prudent credit policies, robust risk management, and digital transformation. Bhutada's leadership has driven the company to exceed its targets ahead of schedule, emphasizing rigorous credit assessment, advanced risk management, and enhanced collection efficiency. By prioritizing customer-centric solutions, leveraging digital innovation, and maintaining strong financial performance, Poonawalla Fincorp sets new benchmarks in the industry. With a continued focus on asset quality, digital enhancement, and exploring growth opportunities, the company is well-positioned for sustained success in the future.
5 Compelling Reasons to Invest in Cryptocurrency NowDaniel
In recent years, cryptocurrencies have emerged as more than just a niche fascination; they have become a transformative force in global finance and technology. Initially propelled by the enigmatic Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies have evolved into a diverse ecosystem of digital assets with the potential to reshape how we perceive and interact with money.
ITES KPO BPO IT sector in the country has increased at an incredible rate o...yashwanthkumar517728
ites KPO and BPO,IT sector in the country has increased at an incredible rate of 35% per year for the last 10 years reinforces the view that India is world class in IT
The IT sector is one of the largest employers of women, and therefore, can play a crucial role in women empowerment and the reduction of gender inequalities.
PFMS, India's Public Financial Management System, revolutionizes fund tracking and distribution, ensuring transparency and efficiency. It enables real-time monitoring, direct benefit transfers, and comprehensive reporting, significantly improving financial management and reducing fraud across government schemes.
Monthly Market Risk Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
Markets rallied in May, with all three major U.S. equity indices up for the month, said Sam Millette, director of fixed income, in his latest Market Risk Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
Monthly Market Risk Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]
3. The three Pillars of Basel II Accord.pptx
1. Spring of knowledge andvirtue
Zanzibar University
IBF 8403 RISK MANAGEMENT IN
ISLAMIC BANKING
TOPIC THREE: The three Pillars of Basel II
Accord
Mr. Ramadhani
2. INTRODUCTION
• The Basel Accord is a set of international banking regulations
that aim to promote stability in the global financial system.
• These regulations were established by the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision (BCBS).
3. Background
• The Basel Accord was first introduced in 1988 as Basel I, in
response to the need for international standards to assess and
mitigate banking risks.
• It was revised and updated over the years, leading to the
introduction of Basel II in 2004 and Basel III in 2010.
• The accord primarily focuses on capital adequacy and risk
management for banks.
4. Basel I
• Basel I aimed to establish minimum capital requirements for
banks based on the level of credit risk they faced.
• It introduced the concept of risk-weighted assets (RWA) to
determine the amount of capital banks needed to hold.
• The accord classified assets into broad risk categories and
assigned risk weights to each category.
5. Limitations of Basel I
• Despite its importance, Basel I had several limitations, such as:
Oversimplified risk-weighting system
• Limited focus on operational and market risks
• Inadequate coverage of off-balance sheet activities
6. Basel II
• Basel II was introduced to address the shortcomings of Basel I
and to provide a more comprehensive framework for risk
management.
• It introduced three pillars to strengthen the banking system:
• Minimum capital requirements
• Supervisory review process
• Market discipline
7. Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements
• Basel II refined the risk-weighting system introduced by Basel I.
• It categorized credit risk into several classes with more precise
risk weights.
• Operational risk and market risk were also given more
prominence.
8. Pillar 2: Supervisory Review Process
• Basel II emphasized the need for effective supervisory oversight
and risk management by banks.
• Banks were required to develop their internal risk assessment
processes and demonstrate adequate capital adequacy.
• Supervisors were responsible for reviewing and assessing
banks' risk management systems.
9. Pillar 3: Market Discipline
• Basel II encouraged banks to enhance their disclosure and
transparency practices.
• Banks were required to disclose information related to their risk
profile, capital adequacy, and risk management strategies.
• Market participants could use this information to make informed
investment decisions.
10. Limitations of Basel II and Introduction to
Basel III
• Basel II, though an improvement, still had limitations:
• Inadequate coverage of liquidity risk
• Insufficient focus on leverage and interconnectedness
• Basel III was introduced in response to the financial crisis of
2008 to further strengthen the global banking system.
11. Basel III
• Basel III expanded the regulatory framework to address the
limitations of Basel II.
• It introduced new measures to enhance the quality and quantity
of capital, manage liquidity risks, and address systemic risks.
• Some key components of Basel III include:
• Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital requirements
• Capital conservation buffer
• Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR)
• Net stable funding ratio (NSFR)
12. Benefits of Basel III
• Basel III aims to:
• Improve the resilience of the banking sector
• Enhance risk management practices
• Increase the overall stability of the global financial system
14. Introduction
• Basel II is an international banking regulation framework
developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(BCBS) to strengthen risk management practices in the banking
industry.
• This presentation will provide an in-depth understanding of the
key components and objectives of Basel II.
15. Background
• Basel II was introduced in 2004 as a revision of the original
Basel Accord (Basel I) to address its limitations and strengthen
the global banking system.
• It aimed to provide a more comprehensive framework for risk
management and capital adequacy.
16. Objectives of Basel II
• Enhance risk sensitivity: Basel II aimed to better align capital
requirements with the underlying risks faced by banks, thus
promoting a more risk-sensitive approach.
• Strengthen risk management: The framework aimed to
encourage banks to improve their risk management practices
and processes.
• Promote international consistency: Basel II aimed to establish a
common international standard for banking regulations,
fostering consistency and comparability across countries.
17. Three Pillars of Basel II
• Basel II comprises three key pillars, each addressing a specific
aspect of risk management and capital adequacy:
• Minimum Capital Requirements
• Supervisory Review Process
• Market Discipline
18. Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements
• Pillar 1 focuses on determining the minimum capital requirements
based on the risks faced by banks.
• It introduced three types of risk: credit risk, operational risk, and
market risk.
• Credit risk: Basel II introduced the concept of internal ratings-based
(IRB) approaches, allowing banks to use their internal models to
determine credit risk capital requirements.
• Operational risk: It provided standardized approaches and advanced
measurement approaches (AMA) for calculating operational risk
capital.
• Market risk: Basel II refined the calculation of capital for market risk,
including interest rate risk, equity risk, and foreign exchange risk.
19. Pillar 2: Supervisory Review Process
• Pillar 2 focuses on the role of supervisors in assessing banks'
risk management processes and determining whether their
capital is adequate.
• It encourages banks to develop their internal risk assessment
processes and demonstrate effective risk management
practices.
• Supervisors are responsible for conducting regular reviews of
banks' risk profiles and assessing the adequacy of their capital.
20. Pillar 3: Market Discipline
• Pillar 3 promotes market discipline and transparency by
requiring banks to disclose information about their risk profile,
capital adequacy, and risk management practices.
• The aim is to provide stakeholders with sufficient information to
make informed investment and risk assessment decisions.
• Disclosures cover areas such as risk exposure, risk mitigation
techniques, and capital composition.
21. Benefits of Basel II
• Improved risk sensitivity: The framework ensures that capital
requirements are aligned with the actual risks faced by banks,
leading to a more accurate measurement of risk.
• Enhanced risk management: Basel II encourages banks to
adopt robust risk management practices, thereby reducing the
likelihood of financial crises.
• Greater transparency: Market discipline and increased
disclosures improve transparency, enabling stakeholders to
make more informed decisions.
• International consistency: Basel II promotes consistency and
comparability in banking regulations across different
jurisdictions.
22. Challenges and Criticisms
• Complexity: The framework is complex and requires substantial
resources for implementation, especially for smaller banks.
• Pro-cyclicality: Some argue that Basel II's risk-sensitive
approach can amplify economic cycles and contribute to
financial instability during downturns.
• Model reliance: Basel II relies on banks' internal models for risk
measurement, which can introduce variability and subjectivity.
23. Basel II Implementation and Impact
• Basel II was implemented gradually in different jurisdictions, with
some countries adopting it more extensively than others.
• The framework significantly influenced risk management practices in
the banking industry, leading to improvements in risk measurement,
capital allocation, and governance.
• The Basel II Accord represents a significant advancement in risk
management and capital adequacy standards for banks.
• It introduced a more comprehensive framework, aligning capital
requirements with underlying risks and promoting international
consistency.
• Basel II played a crucial role in enhancing risk management
practices and transparency in the global banking system.