3 g benchmarking report jan 2012

Udaipur 3G Benchmark Report
February 2012
PhiMetrics Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Section 1
• Benchmarking Equipment and setup
• Data Collection Details
• Voice Testing Algorithm
• Data Testing Algorithm
• Strategic Location Testing
• Benchmarking KPIs: Score Evolution
• Voice & Data KPI weightages
PhiMetrics Benchmarking Methodology

Executive Summary – Udaipur
Udaipur Details
Population 0.6 Million
Area 37 km²
Population Density 16,457 per km²
Udaipur
Operators
Tech
Band of
Operation(MHz)
No. of
3G Cells*
No. of 2G
Cells*
Subscribers
Airtel 3G+2G 2100/900 142 20 12.9 Million
Reliance 3G+2G 2100/1800 32 187 5.25 Million
BSNL 3G+2G 2100/900 119 99 5.28 Million
Reliance HSD EVDO 850 15 2.3 Million
Subscriberfigures are for Rajasthan Circle taken from the latest TRAI report.
*No of Cells is an indicative no the cells encountered during the Voice drive
This report is generated in Phimetrics Proprietory format. This report format cannot be duplicated or copied by Airtel for other reports. Phimetrics reserves the right to use this format for its other customers if required.
3
Udaipur , also known as the City of Lakes, is a city, a Municipal Council and the administrative headquarters of
the Udaipur district in the state of Rajasthan in western India.
The city lies on the Golden Quadrilateral National Highway (NH) 8, midway between Delhi and Mumbai, located
around 700 km from either city.
Demographics of Udaipur

Benchmarking Equipment and Setup
• Nemo Invex is an evolutionary chassis-based benchmarking solution which combines powerful intuitive software
and scalable military grade hardware design to create superior drive-test systems for wireless networks.
• It is built upon a modular platform for Quality of Service (QoS) wireless network drive testing, RF optimization and
competitive network benchmarking.
• The system uses specially configured commercial phones attached to controlling devices in isolation chambers to
perform various tests such as voice calls, data calls, video calls etc.
4

A benchmarking activity, was carried out in Udaipur for over
250Kms across the city. The details of the activity are:
– Total route covered in KMs : approx 250 Kms
– Measurement Period : 30th Jan 2012 to 2nd Feb
2012
– Measurement time during the day : 8 AM to 9 PM
* Except congested area
– Measurement days during the week : Monday to
Saturday
– The drive route was created to cover the dense
population area , key commercial area, key
residential area. The city was divided into 4
clusters/areas. The route consisted of Highways,
Main Roads, Other roads and Streets in the
composition mentioned below.
• Highway - 20%
• Main Road - 40%
• Other Road - 20%
• Streets - 20%
Data Collection Details
4
Cluster 1:
Area Covered:
Pichola, Kalaji Goraji
Cluster 2:
Area Covered: Hiran Magari,
Vardhman Nagar, Jawahar
Nagar, Railway Colony
Cluster 3:
Area Covered:
Panchwati, Pulan,
Sobhagpura,Ahinsapuri
Cluster 4:
Area Covered: NH - 76

Test Details Specifications
No of Operators tested Dual Mode (Airtel, Reliance, BSNL)
Voice Test Algorithm
Call Duration 3 mins (180 Secs)
Idle time in between calls 10 Secs
Continuous call for 3 minute duration with 10 seconds of
Idle time. Speech samples (DL and UL) are sent and
received which provide the MOS score for voice quality.
This was repeated for the entire duration of collection
Voice Testing Algorithm
6

Test Details Specifications
No of Operators tested
Dual Mode (Airtel, Reliance,BSNL)
EvDo Network (Reliance)
Data Test Algorithm
Attach and PDP Activation Before every test
Ping 3 times - 32 bytes on www.google.co.in
FTP Download 10 MB (for EvDo) and 15 MB (for Dual Mode) from server
FTP Upload 1 MB (for EvDo) and 1 MB ( for Dual Mode ) to Server
HTTP 10 different websites.
Email send 100 KB Email to SMTP server
Email Receive 100 KB Email from POP3 server
No HTTP Websites
1 www.google.com
2 www.facebook.com
3 www.nimbuzz.com
4 www.airtel.in
5 www.cricinfo.com
6 www.vuclip.com
7 www.youtube.com
8 www.admob.com
9 www.zedge.net
10 www.nokia.com
Data Testing Algorithm
7
• After every application test, we have 2 sec Idle time before the next Application is tested.

Strategic Locations Specifications
No of Operators tested
Dual Mode (Airtel, Reliance, BSNL)
EvDo Network (Reliance)
Data Test Algorithm
WAP Test 10 different WAP sites
FTP Download 10 MB (for EvDo) and 15MB (for Dual Mode) from Server
Email send 100 KB Email to SMTP server
Email Receive 100 KB Email from POP3 server
SMS SMS send to same number (160 char)
MMS MMS send to same number 15 Kb
WAP sites
wap.google.co.in
m.facebook.com
m.orkut.com
wapin.com
m.cricinfo.com
m.vuclip.com
m.youtube.com
m.admob.com
m.zedge.net
m.sonyericsson.com
Strategic Location Testing
8
Apart from the above tests during the drive, at 5 strategic locations across the city, additional stationary tests
were carried out. These locations are important locations of the city.
1. Airport 4. Suraj Pol
2. Bus Stand 5. Trident Hotel
3. Chetak Circle

 Each KPI is then measured on a scale of 0 to 200 on the basis of performance.
 Value of the Particular KPI is not reported default score is 100.
 The Score is then weighted with the respective weightages to arrive at an overall
Voice or a Data Score.
Benchmarking KPIs: Score Evolution
9

5 KPI’s are used to arrive at the Voice Quality Score and 15 KPI’s are used to arrive at the Data Quality Score
Following are the details of weightings assigned to different KPIs. These are used for arriving at the final ranking
of the operator.
10
Voice & Data Quality Score
*Coverage Calculation:
Coverage = A%*10+B%*8+C%*6+D%*1
10
GRADE RSCP IN dBm
A 0 to -74
B -74 to -82
C -82 to -90
D -90 to -98

Section 2
• Overall Voice Quality Score
• Overall Data Quality Score
• SWOT Analysis for Airtel
• Voice Quality Score
• Data Quality Score
Management Summary

MOS
4.06
3.77
3.71
3.66
3.06
Voice Quality Score
12
Call setup time,
Accessibility,
Retainability,MOS,
Coverage
192
115
88
62
0 9.82
4.68
3.86
2.54
99.35%
98.78%
95.85%
68.00%
100%
3G Coverage
100%
97.00%
85.00%
65.00%
0:00%
VQI CST
2.1
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
CSSR
99.64%
99.05%
96.16%
77.26%
100%
2
1
3
CCR
2
1
3
3
3
2
1
3
CST= Call Setup Time CSSR= Call Setup Success Rate CCR= Call Completion Rate MOS= Mean Opinion Score
VQI Scoring VCQI CST CSSR CCSR MOS Coverage
Airtel 3G 142.05 162.00 90.1 148.7 167.1 130.9
Reliance 3G 23.81 121.20 7 34.3 0 0
BSNL 3G 72.33 115.50 32.2 0 155.7 76.3
1 Airtel 3G
2 Reliance3G
3 BSNL 3G

13
Data Quality Score
HTTP
200
140
100
56
0
FTP DL
200
123
87
62
0
FTP UL
200
108
80
62
9
Email
170
147
100
41
0
DCQI
163
107
81
61
13 2
1
3
2
1
3
1
3
3
2
1
3
Data Attach
200
159
100
58
0
2
1
3
PDP Context
200
133
100
60
0
2
1
3
PING
0
200
118
100
53
2
1
3
2
1
2
4
4
4
4
4
4 4
4
1 Airtel 3G
2 Reliance3G
3 BSNL 3G
4 RelianceEvDo
DQI Scoring DCQI HTTP FTP DL FTP UL Email
Data
Attach
PDP
Context
Ping RTT
Airtel 3G 78.28 8.2 92.64 178.88 89.97 65.12 163.32 54.1
Reliance 3G 48.54 0 79.62 74.82 83.61 0 181.08 0
BSNL 3G 7.25 0 0 0 22.35 77.08 23.24 0
Reliance EvDo 62.29 0 65.28 103.6 58.47 100 100 145.8

Section 3
• Voice Performance Analysis
• Coverage Distribution
• Call Setup Time
• Call Setup Success Rate
– Call Setup Failure Analysis
• Call Completion Success Rate
– Call Completion Failure Analysis
• Accessibility V/s Retainability: Market Comparison
• Voice Quality: MOS
– Airtel MOS Performance
– Airtel EcIo, BLER
– Pilot Pollution Analysis
• Handover Analysis
Detailed Voice Analysis

Call Setup Time:
Airtel has the least call setup time of 2.77 sec.
Call Setup Success Rate:
Airtel has 98.77% Accessibility with just 2 block calls in the entire drive test.
Call Completion Success Rate:
Airtel has 1 drop call and has 99.38% Retainability in the city.
Voice Quality:
Airtel has best speech quality as compared to other operators.
Ranking for Voice KPIs
Voice Performance Analysis
Parameter Best Value Operator
Call Setup Time 2.77 sec Airtel
Accessibility 98.77% Airtel
Retainability 99.38% Airtel
MOS 3.95 Airtel
Coverage 89.64% Airtel
Best Operator Airtel 3G
This report is generated in Phimetrics Proprietary format. This report format cannot be duplicated or copied by Airtel for other reports. Phimetrics reserves the right to use this format for its other customers if required.
15
Operator Coverage Accessibility Retainability Call Setup Time Voice Quality
Airtel 3G 1 1 1 1 1
Reliance3G 3 3 2 2 3
BSNL 3G 2 2 3 3 2

Coverage Distribution
Coverage was measured with the help of a digital scanner/phone for all the networks.
Operator % of Samples > -82
Coverage Rate using
formula
Rank
Airtel 3G 88.32% 89.64% 1
Reliance 3G 49.70% 60.95% 3
BSNL 3G 73.50% 80.27% 2
16
• Airtel has good 3G coverage footprint in the
city as compared other operators.
• Reliance coverage was found to be
noncontiguous which might be due to
temporary failure.

Coverage Plot
17
• There were some poor coverage patches(highlighted areas) in the city. Cluster 3 has lower
coverage which includes industrial areas and Udaipur bypass.

18
Radio Technology Distribution
• Airtel has almost all its voice traffic on 3G, which has resulted in better voice quality
compared to other operators.

• Airtel has the best call setup time compared to
other 3G operators.
Call Setup Time (CST)
19

Operator Call Attempts Blocked Calls CSSR Block Rate
Airtel 3G 162 2 98.77% 1.23%
Reliance 3G 165 6 96.36% 3.64%
BSNL 3G 172 5 97.09% 2.91%
Call Setup Success Rate Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
Total Calls Attempts 162 165 172
Technology Blocked Call Reasons (Radio Cause)
2G SDCCH Drop 1 1 1
2G High RxQual 1
2G Bad Downlink Coverage 2
2G TCH Assignment failure 1
3G RRC Connection failed 2
3G Missing Neighbour 1
3G High BLER 1
3G Poor EcIo 1
Total 2 6 5
CSSR 98.77% 96.36% 97.09%
Call Setup Success Rate is a measure of subscriber experience associated with the access to network resource. It
consists of congestion of network or unavailability of network resources.
Call Setup Success Rate
This report is generated in Phimetrics Proprietary format. This report format cannot be duplicated or copied by Airtel for other reports. Phimetrics reserves he right to use this format for its other customers if required.
20
• Airtel has 98.77% Accessibility with
2 fail calls.

Call Completion Success Rate is a measure of subscriber experience associated with the continued use of
network resources that have been granted. It consists of radio link drops or abnormal network-initiated releases.
Call Completion Success Rate Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
Total Calls Established 162 165 172
Technology Dropped Call Reasons
2G DL Interference 2
3G Missing Neighbour 1
3G Missing Handover 1
3G Low EcIo 1
3G RRC Release received 20
Total 1 5 22
CCSR 99.38% 96.86% 86.83%
Call Completion Success Rate
• Airtel has 99.38% call completion
rate with 1 drop call.
21
Operator
Total Call
Established
Dropped Calls CCSR Drop Rate
Airtel 3G 162 1 99.38% 0.63%
Reliance 3G 165 5 96.86% 3.14%
BSNL 3G 172 22 86.83% 13.17%

Call Setup Failure & Drop Plot
22
Fail Call Drop Call

Accessibility V/s Retainability: Market Comparison
23

Voice Quality: UL & DL MOS
• Airtel has better DL and UL speech quality
amongst all operators.
24

Plot DL MOS
25
DL MOS

Plot EcNo/ BLER
26
Ec/No BLER

Pilot Pollution
27
• A scan was performed to detect all PSCs that were within 10dB Max CPICH EcNo
• It was found that there were a lot of instances where up to 7 PSCs were found in certain locations.
These could cause substantial Interference. Due to Fast Fading, the instantaneous EcIo could go below
the threshold and cause a call to be dropped
• Some of the areas in cluster 1 and 2 have more number of polluting cells.
Airtel

Handover Performance
2G handovers
Inter cell Handovers Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
HO Attempts 25 362 118
HO Success 24 358 109
HO failure 1 4 9
Success Rate 96.00% 98.90% 92.37%
Avg HO Duration (s) 0.116 0.126 0.161
Intracell Handovers Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
HO Attempts 9 1 19
HO Success 9 1 19
HO failure 0 0 0
Success Rate 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Avg HO Duration (s) 0.042 0.088 0.071
3G-3G Handovers
Soft Handovers Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
HO Attempts 5246 270 2651
HO Success 5246 270 2651
HO failure 0 0 0
Success Rate 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
IRAT Handovers
UTRAN Handovers Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
HO Attempts 4 5 71
HO Success 4 5 70
HO failure 0 0 1
Success Rate 100.0% 100.0% 98.6%

Section 3
• Data Performance Analysis
• FTP Performance
– FTP Application ThroughputAnalysis
• HTTP Browsing Analysis
– HTTP Performance(Airtel)
• FTP DL/UL and HTTP Failures
• Email Performance
• GPRS Attach and PDP performance
• Data Access Technology Distribution
• Ping Response: Latency Performance
• SMS Analysis
• MMS Analysis
• KPI Overview Table
Detailed Data Benchmarking

Ranking for Data KPIs
• Airtel have good FTP performance with best
downlink and uplink throughput.
• HTTP browsing performance in terms of browsing
success rate.
• Least GPRS attach delay.
• Airtel has best Email send success rate.
• Higher browsing delay.
Data Performance Analysis
30
Test GPRS Attach (5%) PDP context activation (5%)
Operator
GPRS attach
success rate
(60%)
GPRS attach
Delay (40%)
PDP context
success (60%)
PDP context Delay
(40%)
Airtel 3G 2 1 1 2
Reliance 3G 3 3 1 1
BSNL 3G 1 2 3 3
Test FTP Upload (15%) FTP Download (25%) HTTP (30%) Email Send (5%) Email Retrieve (5%) Ping (10%)
Operator
FTP UL
Success
(40%)
FTP UL
Throughput
(60%)
FTP DL Success
(40%)
FTP DL Throughput
(60%)
HTTP Success
(40%)
HTTP
Download
time (60%)
Email Send
Success
(30%)
Email Send
time (20%)
Email Retrieve
Success (30%)
Email
Retrieve
time (20%)
Ping RTT
Airtel 3G 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 2
Reliance 3G 3 2 4 2 3 1 1 3 3 3 4
BSNL 3G 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3
Reliance EvDo 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 1

FTP Statistics
31
• File transfer is becoming increasingly and
legitimately popular as a method of transferring
media files (movies and music).
• The FTP test is used to test the FTP service
availability and to measure the application
throughput for file download or file upload. The
test is successful when the desired operation
(uploading or downloading) has succeeded.
• Airtel has best downlink and uplink throughput as
compared to other operators.
* BSNL has low FTP throughputs due to lack of
access to data plans beyond a certain limit.

HTTP Browsing Analysis
• The web browsing quality of experience is generally associated with the time it takes to locate and download a web
page within a web browser application.
• The HTTP Download test was conducted with 10 different websites. The Downloaded Page size was approx 350Kb.
• Airtel has higher HTTP browsing time for all web sites.
32

HTTP Performance
33

Airtel FTP DL/UL and HTTP Failures
34
FTP DL Failure
HTTP Browsing Failure
FTP UL Failure

Email Send / Retrieve
35
• A 100KB email was sent and downloaded via
the POP and SMTP protocols. This is a close
simulation of Users accessing pull mail from
their work IDs using their hand phone.
• Airtel has good overall email performance
with least email retrieve delay.

Ping Response: Latency Performance
36
• A Latency Test was Conducted with www.google.co.in with 32bytes of data to figure out the round trip time. A
Ping Response signifies the average delay it takes to access a particular service.
• Airtel has high ping latency, as it takes higher number of hops to reach destination server.

Data Access Technology Distribution
37
• Airtel has spent maximum amount of time on 3G compared to other operators.

Attach and PDP Context Statistics
38
38
• Airtel has good GPRS attach and PDP context activation success rate.
• Airtel has higher PDP context delay compared to Reliance.

39
CQI & Modulation Scheme
Operator CQI > 25 HS-DSCH Codes > 8
Airtel 3G 51.89% 43.29%
Reliance 3G 45.59% 21.95%
BSNL 3G 42.33% 39.19%
• Airtel has better channel quality and has been
assigned higher number of codes.

SMS & MMS Analysis
40

KPI Overview Table
41
The attached KPI table gives an overview about the most important performance figures collected during this
Dual mode Benchmarking campaign.

Section 4
• Clusterwise Summary – Voice
• Clusterwise Snapshot – Voice
• Clusterwise Summary – Data
• Clusterwise Snapshot – Data
• Cluster Analysis
– Cluster 1
– Cluster 2
– Cluster 3
– Cluster 4
Clusterwise Analysis

Clusterwise Summary – Voice
This report is generated in Phimetrics Proprietory format. This report format cannot be duplicated or copied by Airtel3G for other reports. Phimetrics reserves the right to use this format for its other customers if required.
43
Voice Index Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4
Airtel 1 1 1 1
Reliance 3 2 3 3
BSNL 2 3 2 2
Cluster 3
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 4

Clusterwise Snapshot – Voice
44

Clusterwise Summary – Data
45
Cluster 3
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 4
Data Index Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4
Airtel 3G 1 1 1 1
Reliance 3G 4 3 3 3
BSNL 3G 3 4 4 4
Reliance EvDo 2 2 2 2

Clusterwise Snapshot: Data
46
46

Cluster 1 (Pichola, Kalaji Goraji)
47
Best Operator
Voice: Airtel 3G
Data: Airtel 3G
Focus Area: HTTP Browsing Success Rate
• Airtel has low HTTP success rate.
Good Excellent
MOS
Average Poor
CSSR
CCR
CST
Coverage
1

Best Operator
Voice: Airtel 3G
Data: Airtel 3G
Cluster 2 (Hiran Magari, Vardhman Nagar, Jawahar Nagar, Railway Colony)
48
Good Excellent
MOS
Average Poor
CSSR
CCR
CST
Focus Area: Block call and Drop Call
• Airtel has 2 failed calls and 1 drop call in the
entire drive and all of them were in this
cluster.
2
Coverage

• Airtel has poor downlink throughput in this
cluster compared to other clusters
• High ping RTT
Best Operator
Voice: Airtel 3G
Data: Airtel 3G
Cluster 3 (Panchwati, Pulan, Sobhagpura, Ahinsapuri)
49
Good Excellent
MOS
Average Poor
CSSR
CCR
CST
Focus Area: Ping RTT and Downlink
throughput
3
Coverage

• Airtel has poor FTP DL success rate
Best Operator
Voice: Airtel 3G
Data: Airtel 3G
Cluster 4 (NH-76)
50
Good Excellent
MOS
Average Poor
CSSR
CCR
CST
Focus Area: FTP DL Statistics
Coverage
4

Section 5
Strategic Locations Analysis
• Strategic Location: Overview
• Strategic Location: Voice Analysis
• Strategic Location: Data Analysis
– Overall
– Location1: Airport
– Location2: Bus Stand
– Location3: Chetak Circle
– Location4: Suraj Pol
– Location5: Trident Hotel

Strategic Location: Overview
52
5 Strategic Locations were tested for Voice (Accessibility testing) and Data Tests
Locations Latitude Longitude
Airport 24.62473 73.88862
Bus Stand 24.57684 73.70061
Chetak Circle 24.59066 73.69103
Suraj Pol 24.57998 73.69714
Trident Hotel 24.58082 73.67027

• Voice Testing was done at each location with many short calls of 30s duration were made
from a stationary position.
• Voice Accessibility was measured.
• MOS could not be measured as the duration of the call was too short for voice clips to be
relayed
Operators Calls Attempted Calls Failed Calls Dropped Call Setup Time
Airtel 3G 75 0 0 2.65
Reliance 3G 74 0 0 2.99
BSNL 3G 75 0 0 3.18
Strategic Location: Voice Analysis
53
Failed
Locations Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G
Airport 0 0 0
Bus Stand 0 0 0
Chetak Circle 0 0 0
Suraj Pol 0 0 0
Trident Hotel 0 0 0

Strategic Location : Data Analysis
54
Test Airtel 3G Reliance 3G BSNL 3G Reliance EvDo
FTP DL Access 10 12 9 10
FTP DL Success 10 0 0 0
FTP DL Accessibility 100.00% 75.00% 0% 70.00%
FTP DL Mean Data rate(Kbps) 1637.83 1735.15 67.79 367.88
Email Send Access 15 15 15 11
Email Send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 86.67% 73.33%
Email Send Delay 12.4 24.5 45.3 9.9
Email Receive Access 15 15 15 11
Email Receive Success % 100.00% 100.00% 93.33% 73.33%
Email Receive Delay 9.6 11.7 27.9 15.4
SMS send Access 50 50 50 -
SMS send Success % 100.00% 90.00% 94.00% -
SMS send Delay (sec) 2.4 3.7 2.1 -
e2e Delivery Time (sec) 6.4 6.1 3.9
MMS send Access 15 9 6 -
MMS send Success % 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 8.54 9.13 0.00 -
e2e MMS Delivery Time(sec) 37.4 20.0 0.0 -
WAP Browsing Attempt 50 30 40 10
WAP Browsing Success 44 18 32 6
WAP Browsing Success Rate 88.00% 60.00% 80.00% 60.00%
WAP Browsing Delay 49.1 11.9 39.7 30.8

Location 1: Airport
55
FTP DL Accessibility 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Email Send Delay 13.6 90.4 90.3 17.1
SMS send Success % 100.00% 70.00% 100.00% -
e2e Delivery Time (sec) 4.8 10.3 4.5 -
MMS send Success % 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 7.99 0.00 0.00 -

Location 2: Bus Stand
56
SMS send Success % 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% -
MMS send Success % 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 7.41 0.00 0.00 -
WAP Browsing Attempt 10 0 10 -
WAP Browsing Success 8 0 10 -
WAP Browsing Success Rate 80.00% 0% 100.00% -
WAP Browsing Delay 37.3 0.0 43.1 -

Location 3 : Chetak Circle
57
SMS send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 70.00% -
MMS send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 12.79 9.13 0.00 -

Location 4 : Suraj Pol
58
SMS send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% -
MMS send Success % 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 7.10 0.00 0.00 -
WAP Browsing Success Rate 100.00% 100.00% 60.00% -

Location 5 : Trident Hotel
59
SMS send Success % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% -
MMS send Success % 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% -
MMS send Delay 7.41 0.00 0.00 -
WAP Browsing Success Rate 80.00% 0.00% 100.00% -

Section 6
Summary
• SWOT Analysis for Airtel
• Key findings

SWOT Analysis for Airtel
• High HTTP browsing time
• Higher ping RTT
• Poor data performance in cluster 3 in terms of downlink
throughputs and RTT
• Cluster 3 has poor 3G coverage compared to other clusters
• Airtel has least call setup time.
• Airtel has best Accessibility and Voice call Retainability.
• Airtel has best DL speech quality.
• Airtel has 100% FTP UL success rate and best FTP
Downlink and Uplink throughput.
Strengths Weaknesses
Threats
• Web Browsing experience is lower compared to
other 3G Cities
• 3G coverage can further be improved by improving it in
cluster 3
• Ping latency can be improved by optimizing routing nodes
and delay for each hops
Opportunities
61

Observations and Recommendations
• Airtel has the best 3G experience for both voice and data, which can be
capitalized given the importance of this tourist place.
• Cluster 1 and 2 still have few areas which can be further improved for
indoor coverage.
• The Browsing experience can be further improved to widen the gap with
its competitors by improving latency.
62

Thank You
63
Prepared by: Sanket Jain
Verified by: Hardik Patel
Attested by: Mohit Lohani

3 g benchmarking report jan 2012

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to 3 g benchmarking report jan 2012

Similar to 3 g benchmarking report jan 2012 (20)

More from EMERSON EDUARDO RODRIGUES

More from EMERSON EDUARDO RODRIGUES (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

3 g benchmarking report jan 2012