©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency
The basic units of sentence structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Meaning of a sentence is more
than the sum of its words.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Meaning of a sentence is more
than the sum of its words.
a. The puppy hit the rock
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Meaning of a sentence is more
than the sum of its words.
a. The puppy hit the rock
b. The rock hit the puppy.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Meaning of a sentence is more
than the sum of its words.
a. The puppy hit the rock
b. The rock hit the puppy.
c. The + puppy + hit + the +rock ≠ the + rock
+ hit + the + puppy.
(cf. 2 + 3 = 3 + 2)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Meaning of a sentence is more
than the sum of its words.
a. The puppy hit the rock
b. The rock hit the puppy.
c. The + puppy + hit + the +rock ≠ the + rock
+ hit + the + puppy.
(cf. 2 + 3 = 3 + 2)
This fact is captured by the notion that sentences
have internal structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
Yes/no questions can be answered by “yes” or
“no” or “maybe”
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
Yes/no questions can be answered by “yes” or
“no” or “maybe”
Bear with me, I’m going to run this using the
scientific method, and I have a particular set of
hypotheses to run through!
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
Remember: The S.M. requires that we always go
with the simplest hypothesis consistent with the
data we have. (Occam’s razor)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Another argument for structure:
Yes/No questions
Remember: The S.M. requires that we always go
with the simplest hypothesis consistent with the
data we have. (Occam’s razor)
Let’s start with the assumption that there is no
structure, and sentences are just a linear string of
words. Now consider the following pair of
sentences.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Consider the following sentences:
a. Dave can’t eat chocolate covered almonds.
b. Can’t Dave eat chocolate covered almonds?
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Consider the following sentences:
a. Dave can’t eat chocolate covered almonds.
b. Can’t Dave eat chocolate covered almonds?
Hypothesis # 1
To form a yes/no question move the 2nd
word to the front of the sentence.
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 1
To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word
to the front of the sentence
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 1
To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word
to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a. The TA can’t eat chocolate covered almonds.
b. *TA the can’t eat chocolate covered almonds?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 1
To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word
to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a. The TA can’t eat chocolate covered almonds.
b. *TA the can’t eat chocolate covered almonds?
Hypothesis #2
To form a yes/no question move the verb to the
front of the sentence
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 2
To form a yes/no question move the verb to the
front of the sentence.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 2
To form a yes/no question move the verb to the
front of the sentence.
Problem:
a. The TA ate chocolate covered almonds.
b. *Ate the TA chocolate covered almonds.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis # 2
To form a yes/no question move the verb to the
front of the sentence.
Problem:
a. The TA ate chocolate covered almonds.
b. *Ate the TA chocolate covered almonds.
Hypothesis #3
To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary
to the front of the sentence
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis #3
To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary
to the front of the sentence
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis #3
To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary
to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a.The TA has been eating chocolate covered almonds.
b.*Been the TA has eating chocolate covered almonds?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
Hypothesis #3
To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary
to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a.The TA has been eating chocolate covered almonds.
b.*Been the TA has eating chocolate covered almonds?
Hypothesis #4
To form a yes/no question move the first
auxiliary to the front of the sentence
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis #4
To form a yes/no question move the first
auxiliary to the front of the sentence
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis #4
To form a yes/no question move the first
auxiliary to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a.The TA who is here can eat chocolate covered almonds.
b.*Is the TA here can eat chocolate covered almonds?
c.(cf. Can the TA who is here eat chocolate covered
almonds?)
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis #4
To form a yes/no question move the first
auxiliary to the front of the sentence
Problem:
a.The TA who is here can eat chocolate covered almonds.
b.*Is the TA here can eat chocolate covered almonds?
c.(cf. Can the TA who is here eat chocolate covered
almonds?)
What’s the problem here?
The first auxiliary is part of the subject of the sentence:
[The TA who is here] can eat chocolate covered almonds
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis 5
To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary
after the subject to the front of the sentence
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis 5
To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary
after the subject to the front of the sentence
We require a notion where there is internal structure
to the sentence: We need a notion of what the subject
is: which words are in the subject and which words
aren’t.
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Hypothesis 5
To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary
after the subject to the front of the sentence
We require a notion where there is internal structure
to the sentence: We need a notion of what the subject
is: which words are in the subject and which words
aren’t.
There is an alternative hypothesis (move the main clause
auxiliary to the front) but this again requires a notion of internal
structure: we need to be able to distinguish which words are just
in the main clause from those in relative clauses.
Structure
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Internal structure is represented by
the notion of
Constituent
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
[The TA who is here] can eat chocolate.
Bracketing (as above) is one of two notations
for representing, or marking, constituents.
(The other is tree notation, which we’ll formally
cover next week).
A Constituent is any unit of internal
syntactic structure.
(i.e., a group of words functioning as a unit)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents represent semantically
related material
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents represent semantically
related material
In the sentence:
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents represent semantically
related material
In the sentence:
The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents represent semantically
related material
In the sentence:
The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts
There is the intuition that the & elephant are
more closely related than peanuts and
snorted.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents represent semantically
related material
In the sentence:
The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts
There is the intuition that the & elephant are
more closely related than peanuts and
snorted.
This intuition is captured with constituency
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituent
Constituent is a group of words that functions
as a unit.
The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Modification
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Modification
If one word modifies (limits the meaning
of) another, then they are probably part of
the same constituent.
I bought a red balloon
‘a’ and ‘red’ both modify ‘balloon’ so they are
all part of the same constituent: [a red balloon]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
It was [a brand new car] that he bought
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
It was [a brand new car] that he bought
Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I
like.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
It was [a brand new car] that he bought
Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I
like.
Passive: [The big boy] was kissed by the
slobbering dog.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Movement
If you can move a group of words, they
are functioning as a unit—and are a
constituent:
Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
It was [a brand new car] that he bought
Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I
like.
Passive: [The big boy] was kissed by the
slobbering dog.
There are other kinds of movement!
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Replacement
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a
single word (keeping the meaning roughly
the same) then they form a constituent:
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a
single word (keeping the meaning roughly
the same) then they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a
single word (keeping the meaning roughly
the same) then they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
I’ve always loved [John]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a
single word (keeping the meaning roughly
the same) then they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
I’ve always loved [John]
I’ve always loved [him]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a pro-
form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.)
(keeping the meaning roughly the same) then
they form a constituent:
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a pro-
form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.)
(keeping the meaning roughly the same) then
they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a pro-
form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.)
(keeping the meaning roughly the same) then
they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
I’ve always loved [him]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a pro-
form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.)
(keeping the meaning roughly the same) then
they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
I’ve always loved [him]
Susan [bought a truck with mag wheels]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Pro-form
Replacement
If you can replace a group of words with a pro-
form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.)
(keeping the meaning roughly the same) then
they form a constituent:
I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
I’ve always loved [him]
Susan [bought a truck with mag wheels]
Susan [did (so) too)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Ellipsis
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Ellipsis
This is a special constituency test for a
constituent called a Verb Phrase (VP). If
an item is a VP, then it can be deleted
under (near) identity with another VP
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Ellipsis
This is a special constituency test for a
constituent called a Verb Phrase (VP). If
an item is a VP, then it can be deleted
under (near) identity with another VP
Bill [found a gold nugget in the stream] but I
don’t think John will [find a gold nugget in
the stream]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
Q: Where did Heidi put them?
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Stand Alone
(sentence fragment)
Can the group of words serve as a sentence
fragment in response to a question?
Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
Q: Where did Heidi put them?
A: [In the back of her car]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Conjunction
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Conjunction
If the group of words can be coordinated (or
conjoined) with another string, then it is a
constituent of the same type:
[John] and [the man] went to the store
*[John] and [very blue] went to the store
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituency Tests: Conjunction
If the group of words can be coordinated (or
conjoined) with another string, then it is a
constituent of the same type:
[John] and [the man] went to the store
*[John] and [very blue] went to the store
LINGUISTICS GENERAL’S WARNING: There
are a *lot* of situations where the conjunction
test will give you false results. Use it sparingly
and with caution! (See textbook for details.)
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Caution:
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Caution:
The constituency tests are NOT fool proof.
You should always apply at least two to any
given string of words, just in case you have
got false results for some reason.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really fancy restaurants]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really fancy restaurants]
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
Eat at really fancy restaurants.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really fancy restaurants]
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
Eat at really fancy restaurants.
Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, pro-verb)?
John [eats at really fancy restaurants] and Bill [does (so) too]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really fancy restaurants]
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
Eat at really fancy restaurants.
Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, pro-verb)?
John [eats at really fancy restaurants] and Bill [does (so) too]
Move?
Eating at really fancy restaurants, that’s John’s favorite
pastime.
I told John to eat at really fancy restaurants, and [eat at really
fancy restaurants] he will!
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really] fancy restaurants
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really] fancy restaurants
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
*Eat at really.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really] fancy restaurants
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
*Eat at really.
Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, proverb)?
*John [eats at really] fancy restaurants and Bill [does
so too] fancy restaurants
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
John [eats at really] fancy restaurants
Stand Alone?
What does John do in his spare time?
*Eat at really.
Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, proverb)?
*John [eats at really] fancy restaurants and Bill [does
so too] fancy restaurants
Move?
*Eating at really, that’s John’s favorite pastime.
*Eating at really is what John does fancy restaurants.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents are hierarchically
organized
TP
NP VP
D N V PP
The man eats
P NP
at
AdjP N
fancy restaurants
The man eats at fancy
restaurants.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Constituents are hierarchically
organized
TP
NP VP
D N V PP
The man eats
P NP
at
AdjP N
fancy restaurants
The man eats at fancy
restaurants.
[TP [NP[DThe] [Nman]] [VP [Veats] [PP [Pat] [NP [Adjfancy] [Nrestaurants]]]]]
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
Constituent: A group of words that
functions as a unit.
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
Constituent: A group of words that
functions as a unit.
Captures judgments about the relatedness
of words, and about the hierarchical
structure of sentences
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
Constituency tests:
Modification
Movement
Replacement (single word & pro-form)
Ellipsis (for VPs)
Stand Alone (Sentence Fragment)
Co-ordination/Conjunction
©Andrew Carnie, 2006
Summary: Constituency
Constituency tests:
Modification
Movement
Replacement (single word & pro-form)
Ellipsis (for VPs)
Stand Alone (Sentence Fragment)
Co-ordination/Conjunction
Tests are NOT infallible. Use more than 1!

3.1-Constituency for syntax lessons only

  • 1.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituency Thebasic units of sentence structure
  • 2.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Meaningof a sentence is more than the sum of its words.
  • 3.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Meaningof a sentence is more than the sum of its words. a. The puppy hit the rock
  • 4.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Meaningof a sentence is more than the sum of its words. a. The puppy hit the rock b. The rock hit the puppy.
  • 5.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Meaningof a sentence is more than the sum of its words. a. The puppy hit the rock b. The rock hit the puppy. c. The + puppy + hit + the +rock ≠ the + rock + hit + the + puppy. (cf. 2 + 3 = 3 + 2)
  • 6.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Meaningof a sentence is more than the sum of its words. a. The puppy hit the rock b. The rock hit the puppy. c. The + puppy + hit + the +rock ≠ the + rock + hit + the + puppy. (cf. 2 + 3 = 3 + 2) This fact is captured by the notion that sentences have internal structure
  • 7.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions
  • 8.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions Yes/no questions can be answered by “yes” or “no” or “maybe”
  • 9.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions Yes/no questions can be answered by “yes” or “no” or “maybe” Bear with me, I’m going to run this using the scientific method, and I have a particular set of hypotheses to run through!
  • 10.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions
  • 11.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions Remember: The S.M. requires that we always go with the simplest hypothesis consistent with the data we have. (Occam’s razor)
  • 12.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Anotherargument for structure: Yes/No questions Remember: The S.M. requires that we always go with the simplest hypothesis consistent with the data we have. (Occam’s razor) Let’s start with the assumption that there is no structure, and sentences are just a linear string of words. Now consider the following pair of sentences.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Considerthe following sentences: a. Dave can’t eat chocolate covered almonds. b. Can’t Dave eat chocolate covered almonds? Structure
  • 15.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Considerthe following sentences: a. Dave can’t eat chocolate covered almonds. b. Can’t Dave eat chocolate covered almonds? Hypothesis # 1 To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word to the front of the sentence. Structure
  • 16.
  • 17.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 1 To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word to the front of the sentence
  • 18.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 1 To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word to the front of the sentence Problem: a. The TA can’t eat chocolate covered almonds. b. *TA the can’t eat chocolate covered almonds?
  • 19.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 1 To form a yes/no question move the 2nd word to the front of the sentence Problem: a. The TA can’t eat chocolate covered almonds. b. *TA the can’t eat chocolate covered almonds? Hypothesis #2 To form a yes/no question move the verb to the front of the sentence
  • 20.
  • 21.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 2 To form a yes/no question move the verb to the front of the sentence.
  • 22.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 2 To form a yes/no question move the verb to the front of the sentence. Problem: a. The TA ate chocolate covered almonds. b. *Ate the TA chocolate covered almonds.
  • 23.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis# 2 To form a yes/no question move the verb to the front of the sentence. Problem: a. The TA ate chocolate covered almonds. b. *Ate the TA chocolate covered almonds. Hypothesis #3 To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary to the front of the sentence
  • 24.
  • 25.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis#3 To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary to the front of the sentence
  • 26.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis#3 To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary to the front of the sentence Problem: a.The TA has been eating chocolate covered almonds. b.*Been the TA has eating chocolate covered almonds?
  • 27.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Structure Hypothesis#3 To form a yes/no question move the auxiliary to the front of the sentence Problem: a.The TA has been eating chocolate covered almonds. b.*Been the TA has eating chocolate covered almonds? Hypothesis #4 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary to the front of the sentence
  • 28.
  • 29.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis#4 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary to the front of the sentence Structure
  • 30.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis#4 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary to the front of the sentence Problem: a.The TA who is here can eat chocolate covered almonds. b.*Is the TA here can eat chocolate covered almonds? c.(cf. Can the TA who is here eat chocolate covered almonds?) Structure
  • 31.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis#4 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary to the front of the sentence Problem: a.The TA who is here can eat chocolate covered almonds. b.*Is the TA here can eat chocolate covered almonds? c.(cf. Can the TA who is here eat chocolate covered almonds?) What’s the problem here? The first auxiliary is part of the subject of the sentence: [The TA who is here] can eat chocolate covered almonds Structure
  • 32.
  • 33.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis5 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary after the subject to the front of the sentence Structure
  • 34.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis5 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary after the subject to the front of the sentence We require a notion where there is internal structure to the sentence: We need a notion of what the subject is: which words are in the subject and which words aren’t. Structure
  • 35.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Hypothesis5 To form a yes/no question move the first auxiliary after the subject to the front of the sentence We require a notion where there is internal structure to the sentence: We need a notion of what the subject is: which words are in the subject and which words aren’t. There is an alternative hypothesis (move the main clause auxiliary to the front) but this again requires a notion of internal structure: we need to be able to distinguish which words are just in the main clause from those in relative clauses. Structure
  • 36.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Internalstructure is represented by the notion of Constituent
  • 37.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 [TheTA who is here] can eat chocolate. Bracketing (as above) is one of two notations for representing, or marking, constituents. (The other is tree notation, which we’ll formally cover next week). A Constituent is any unit of internal syntactic structure. (i.e., a group of words functioning as a unit)
  • 38.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsrepresent semantically related material
  • 39.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsrepresent semantically related material In the sentence:
  • 40.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsrepresent semantically related material In the sentence: The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts
  • 41.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsrepresent semantically related material In the sentence: The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts There is the intuition that the & elephant are more closely related than peanuts and snorted.
  • 42.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsrepresent semantically related material In the sentence: The elephant snorted a bowl of peanuts There is the intuition that the & elephant are more closely related than peanuts and snorted. This intuition is captured with constituency
  • 43.
  • 44.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit.
  • 45.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 46.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 47.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 48.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 49.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 50.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituent Constituentis a group of words that functions as a unit. The elephant snorted the bowl of peanuts
  • 51.
  • 52.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Modification If one word modifies (limits the meaning of) another, then they are probably part of the same constituent. I bought a red balloon ‘a’ and ‘red’ both modify ‘balloon’ so they are all part of the same constituent: [a red balloon]
  • 53.
  • 54.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent:
  • 55.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent: Clefting: It is/was __________ that …
  • 56.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent: Clefting: It is/was __________ that … It was [a brand new car] that he bought
  • 57.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent: Clefting: It is/was __________ that … It was [a brand new car] that he bought Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I like.
  • 58.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent: Clefting: It is/was __________ that … It was [a brand new car] that he bought Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I like. Passive: [The big boy] was kissed by the slobbering dog.
  • 59.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Movement If you can move a group of words, they are functioning as a unit—and are a constituent: Clefting: It is/was __________ that … It was [a brand new car] that he bought Preposing: [Big bowls of beans] are what I like. Passive: [The big boy] was kissed by the slobbering dog. There are other kinds of movement!
  • 60.
  • 61.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a single word (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent:
  • 62.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a single word (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
  • 63.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a single word (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit] I’ve always loved [John]
  • 64.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a single word (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit] I’ve always loved [John] I’ve always loved [him]
  • 65.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement
  • 66.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a pro- form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.) (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent:
  • 67.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a pro- form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.) (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit]
  • 68.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a pro- form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.) (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit] I’ve always loved [him]
  • 69.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a pro- form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.) (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit] I’ve always loved [him] Susan [bought a truck with mag wheels]
  • 70.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Pro-form Replacement If you can replace a group of words with a pro- form (pronoun, pro-verb, pro-adjective etc.) (keeping the meaning roughly the same) then they form a constituent: I’ve always loved [the man in a natty suit] I’ve always loved [him] Susan [bought a truck with mag wheels] Susan [did (so) too)
  • 71.
  • 72.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Ellipsis This is a special constituency test for a constituent called a Verb Phrase (VP). If an item is a VP, then it can be deleted under (near) identity with another VP
  • 73.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Ellipsis This is a special constituency test for a constituent called a Verb Phrase (VP). If an item is a VP, then it can be deleted under (near) identity with another VP Bill [found a gold nugget in the stream] but I don’t think John will [find a gold nugget in the stream]
  • 74.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment)
  • 75.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question?
  • 76.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question?
  • 77.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market?
  • 78.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
  • 79.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts]
  • 80.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts] Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket?
  • 81.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts] Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket? A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
  • 82.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts] Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket? A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts]
  • 83.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts] Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket? A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts] Q: Where did Heidi put them?
  • 84.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Stand Alone (sentence fragment) Can the group of words serve as a sentence fragment in response to a question? Q: What did Heidi buy at the flea market? A: [A bag of moldy vacuum cleaner parts] Q: What did Heidi do at the fleamarket? A: [Buy some cheap T-shirts] Q: Where did Heidi put them? A: [In the back of her car]
  • 85.
  • 86.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Conjunction If the group of words can be coordinated (or conjoined) with another string, then it is a constituent of the same type: [John] and [the man] went to the store *[John] and [very blue] went to the store
  • 87.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 ConstituencyTests: Conjunction If the group of words can be coordinated (or conjoined) with another string, then it is a constituent of the same type: [John] and [the man] went to the store *[John] and [very blue] went to the store LINGUISTICS GENERAL’S WARNING: There are a *lot* of situations where the conjunction test will give you false results. Use it sparingly and with caution! (See textbook for details.)
  • 88.
  • 89.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Caution: Theconstituency tests are NOT fool proof. You should always apply at least two to any given string of words, just in case you have got false results for some reason.
  • 90.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really fancy restaurants]
  • 91.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really fancy restaurants] Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? Eat at really fancy restaurants.
  • 92.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really fancy restaurants] Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? Eat at really fancy restaurants. Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, pro-verb)? John [eats at really fancy restaurants] and Bill [does (so) too]
  • 93.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really fancy restaurants] Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? Eat at really fancy restaurants. Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, pro-verb)? John [eats at really fancy restaurants] and Bill [does (so) too] Move? Eating at really fancy restaurants, that’s John’s favorite pastime. I told John to eat at really fancy restaurants, and [eat at really fancy restaurants] he will!
  • 94.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really] fancy restaurants
  • 95.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really] fancy restaurants Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? *Eat at really.
  • 96.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really] fancy restaurants Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? *Eat at really. Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, proverb)? *John [eats at really] fancy restaurants and Bill [does so too] fancy restaurants
  • 97.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 John[eats at really] fancy restaurants Stand Alone? What does John do in his spare time? *Eat at really. Replace by a Pro-form (pronoun, proverb)? *John [eats at really] fancy restaurants and Bill [does so too] fancy restaurants Move? *Eating at really, that’s John’s favorite pastime. *Eating at really is what John does fancy restaurants.
  • 98.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsare hierarchically organized TP NP VP D N V PP The man eats P NP at AdjP N fancy restaurants The man eats at fancy restaurants.
  • 99.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Constituentsare hierarchically organized TP NP VP D N V PP The man eats P NP at AdjP N fancy restaurants The man eats at fancy restaurants. [TP [NP[DThe] [Nman]] [VP [Veats] [PP [Pat] [NP [Adjfancy] [Nrestaurants]]]]]
  • 100.
  • 101.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Summary:Constituency Constituent: A group of words that functions as a unit.
  • 102.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Summary:Constituency Constituent: A group of words that functions as a unit. Captures judgments about the relatedness of words, and about the hierarchical structure of sentences
  • 103.
  • 104.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Summary:Constituency Constituency tests: Modification Movement Replacement (single word & pro-form) Ellipsis (for VPs) Stand Alone (Sentence Fragment) Co-ordination/Conjunction
  • 105.
    ©Andrew Carnie, 2006 Summary:Constituency Constituency tests: Modification Movement Replacement (single word & pro-form) Ellipsis (for VPs) Stand Alone (Sentence Fragment) Co-ordination/Conjunction Tests are NOT infallible. Use more than 1!