40 Years of Risk
Communication
Research?
John C. Besley, Michigan State University
We now know a lot about
‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
The psychological processes that underlie
risk perceptions and decision-making
The evaluative beliefs that
underlie risk-related behaviors
Risk Beliefs
Benefit Beliefs
Normative Beliefs
Self-Efficacy Beliefs
Competence Beliefs
Benevolence Beliefs
Integrity Beliefs
Openness Beliefs
Identity Beliefs
Cause/Effect Beliefs
Behavior change
theories
Trust/Fairness
Theories
We now know a lot about
‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
The importance of affect and discrete
emotions on risk-related behavior
We now know a something about
‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
How we frame
risk-related issues
Rory, Half Full or Half Empty, via Flirkr creative commons
We now know a lot about
‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
We now know a something about …
How to ethically use various communication
tactics to respectfully try to affect behaviors
Psychological
Processes
Evaluative
Beliefs
Feelings Frames
Communication Objectives/OutcomesCommunication
Tactics
Messages
Behaviors
Style/Tone
Channels
Messengers
Goal Behaviors
Individual Change
Support for Change
Acceptance of Change
(Or no change)
Communication Strategy
Implementation
What we don’t seem to know is …
How can we get the scientific community to be
more scientific when it comes to risk communication?
“Join … Dr. Anthony Fauci
and Alan Alda, in a discussion
of how to restore the faith of the
American people in science
and the scientific agencies—
what we must do now, and in
the months ahead, to rebuild
their trust in these essential
actors and institutions.”

2020 Slides to Support Short SRA Plenary Talk

  • 1.
    40 Years ofRisk Communication Research? John C. Besley, Michigan State University
  • 2.
    We now knowa lot about ‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ … The psychological processes that underlie risk perceptions and decision-making
  • 3.
    The evaluative beliefsthat underlie risk-related behaviors Risk Beliefs Benefit Beliefs Normative Beliefs Self-Efficacy Beliefs Competence Beliefs Benevolence Beliefs Integrity Beliefs Openness Beliefs Identity Beliefs Cause/Effect Beliefs Behavior change theories Trust/Fairness Theories We now know a lot about ‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
  • 4.
    The importance ofaffect and discrete emotions on risk-related behavior We now know a something about ‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
  • 5.
    How we frame risk-relatedissues Rory, Half Full or Half Empty, via Flirkr creative commons We now know a lot about ‘how to affect’ and the ‘effect of’ …
  • 6.
    We now knowa something about … How to ethically use various communication tactics to respectfully try to affect behaviors Psychological Processes Evaluative Beliefs Feelings Frames Communication Objectives/OutcomesCommunication Tactics Messages Behaviors Style/Tone Channels Messengers Goal Behaviors Individual Change Support for Change Acceptance of Change (Or no change) Communication Strategy Implementation
  • 7.
    What we don’tseem to know is … How can we get the scientific community to be more scientific when it comes to risk communication? “Join … Dr. Anthony Fauci and Alan Alda, in a discussion of how to restore the faith of the American people in science and the scientific agencies— what we must do now, and in the months ahead, to rebuild their trust in these essential actors and institutions.”

Editor's Notes

  • #2 My perspective …
  • #3 Heuristics and biases, heuristic vs. systematic processing Motivated reasoning, biased processing as a function of identity protection Construal level theory/psychological distance Maybe also uncertainty management theory?
  • #4 Knowledge about the natural world/processes
  • #7 Have to respect communities, champion diversity, equity and inclusion, be open to changing our own views and behaviors …
  • #8 How can we get people to draw on us and use our knowledge, insight, techniques, etc. That means investing real money in communication early in the process and treating communicators as equals.