Takayuki Kira, "Normative Range Problem on Intergenerational Justice" (discussion with Prof. Konrad Ott), International Workshop on Meta-Science & Technology (invited), 22 March 2019, Kobe University, Japan.
Improving Civic Intelligence: Repairing the Engine on a Moving Car?Douglas Schuler
These are the slides from my keynote presentation at the recent Conference, Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE 2014), in St. Petersburg, Russia. Bottom line: There is a LOT to be done — and government, e- or not, can't do it without citizens.
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Clim...Matthew Nisbet
March 27, 2014 presentation sponsored by the Science and Technology Studies Program, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, and the School of Journalism at the University of British Columbia.
In this presentation, I review three distinct groups of prominent public intellectuals arguing for action on climate change. I discuss how these individuals establish and maintain their authority, how their ideas and arguments spread and diffuse by way of the media, and how they shape the assumptions of global networks of activists, philanthropists, journalists, and academics. Then, for each group, drawing on their main works, I describe how they define the social implications of climate change and the barriers to addressing the problem, their vision of a future society and their favored policy actions, their outlook on nature and technology, and their views on politics and social change. In the conclusion, I discuss the need for investment in media and public forums that strengthen our civic capacity to learn, debate, and collaborate in ways that take advantage of different discourses, ideas and voices.
Seasteads: Opportunities and Challenges for Small New Societies - Extractvdf Hochschulverlag AG
Seasteads – artificial settlements on the open sea – represent a near-future chance for multiple societal restarts. Where nation states suffer from ineffectiveness and inefficiency, both politically and economically, and cannot be changed due to path-dependency and rigidity, the open sea is a clean slate. Here, we can test new ways of doing things differently.
This book discusses the opportunities and challenges of seasteads. Its focus is on socio-philosophical, political, economic, and legal aspects of founding new small societies of pro-active and productive individuals and groups. An explorative exercise, this book presents paradigmatic ideas and suggestions for partial aspects of seasteads.
Extract from: https://vdf.ch/seasteads.html
Improving Civic Intelligence: Repairing the Engine on a Moving Car?Douglas Schuler
These are the slides from my keynote presentation at the recent Conference, Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE 2014), in St. Petersburg, Russia. Bottom line: There is a LOT to be done — and government, e- or not, can't do it without citizens.
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Clim...Matthew Nisbet
March 27, 2014 presentation sponsored by the Science and Technology Studies Program, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, and the School of Journalism at the University of British Columbia.
In this presentation, I review three distinct groups of prominent public intellectuals arguing for action on climate change. I discuss how these individuals establish and maintain their authority, how their ideas and arguments spread and diffuse by way of the media, and how they shape the assumptions of global networks of activists, philanthropists, journalists, and academics. Then, for each group, drawing on their main works, I describe how they define the social implications of climate change and the barriers to addressing the problem, their vision of a future society and their favored policy actions, their outlook on nature and technology, and their views on politics and social change. In the conclusion, I discuss the need for investment in media and public forums that strengthen our civic capacity to learn, debate, and collaborate in ways that take advantage of different discourses, ideas and voices.
Seasteads: Opportunities and Challenges for Small New Societies - Extractvdf Hochschulverlag AG
Seasteads – artificial settlements on the open sea – represent a near-future chance for multiple societal restarts. Where nation states suffer from ineffectiveness and inefficiency, both politically and economically, and cannot be changed due to path-dependency and rigidity, the open sea is a clean slate. Here, we can test new ways of doing things differently.
This book discusses the opportunities and challenges of seasteads. Its focus is on socio-philosophical, political, economic, and legal aspects of founding new small societies of pro-active and productive individuals and groups. An explorative exercise, this book presents paradigmatic ideas and suggestions for partial aspects of seasteads.
Extract from: https://vdf.ch/seasteads.html
We examine climate justice as the explicit framing of climate change as an ethical and political issue. We first look at justice broadly, then environmental justice, and then climate justice. We conclude with a question about justice as degrowth or green growth.
Disasters and Resilience: Issues and PerspectivesOSU_Superfund
PREPARED BY: Nina Lam, Professor LSU Environmental Sciences January 29, 2013
More information on symposium: http://superfund.oregonstate.edu/LSUSymposium1.13
4 Tips for Writing a Diversity College Essay - How to write an .... College Essay Outline: Essay on university in diversity. College diversity essay by bilb97vipy - Issuu. College essays about diversity.
A comprehensive power point of Ken Cloke's presentations on the work of Mediators Beyond Borders and the principles contained in his book Conflict Revolution: Mediating Evil, War, Injustice and Terrorism or How Mediators Can Help Save the Planet (images courtesy of the internet & not Ken's responsibility)
Act locally, Think Globally, Read and Write CriticallyKim Moore
This session will explore project-based learning by focusing on the questions surrounding stewardship to our planet. Creating Informational Literacy through exploration of topical reading selections, we will analyze and discuss ways to bring relevance to our classrooms through real-world problem-solving. These issues are impactful and relevant to our future; therefore, they have significant meaning in our classrooms.
We will investigate this topic through:
Live interactive technology integration
Discussion
Writing
Hand-on exploration
via group collaboration and individualized learning strategies.
We examine climate justice as the explicit framing of climate change as an ethical and political issue. We first look at justice broadly, then environmental justice, and then climate justice. We conclude with a question about justice as degrowth or green growth.
Disasters and Resilience: Issues and PerspectivesOSU_Superfund
PREPARED BY: Nina Lam, Professor LSU Environmental Sciences January 29, 2013
More information on symposium: http://superfund.oregonstate.edu/LSUSymposium1.13
4 Tips for Writing a Diversity College Essay - How to write an .... College Essay Outline: Essay on university in diversity. College diversity essay by bilb97vipy - Issuu. College essays about diversity.
A comprehensive power point of Ken Cloke's presentations on the work of Mediators Beyond Borders and the principles contained in his book Conflict Revolution: Mediating Evil, War, Injustice and Terrorism or How Mediators Can Help Save the Planet (images courtesy of the internet & not Ken's responsibility)
Act locally, Think Globally, Read and Write CriticallyKim Moore
This session will explore project-based learning by focusing on the questions surrounding stewardship to our planet. Creating Informational Literacy through exploration of topical reading selections, we will analyze and discuss ways to bring relevance to our classrooms through real-world problem-solving. These issues are impactful and relevant to our future; therefore, they have significant meaning in our classrooms.
We will investigate this topic through:
Live interactive technology integration
Discussion
Writing
Hand-on exploration
via group collaboration and individualized learning strategies.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2019.3.22 International Workshop on Meta-Science & Technology
1. Normative Range Problem
on Intergenerational Justice
22 Mar 2019
International Workshop on Meta-Science & Technology,
Kobe University, Japan.
Takayuki Kira
(吉良 貴之)
Utsunomiya Kyowa Univ., JP
jj57010@gmail.com
SNS: tkira26
JSPS Grant Number: 18K12616
[My website]
3. Introduction
• Japanese court has a tendency to recognize a relatively loose
causation of an action and the damage in fatal cases.
• Distribution of causation and responsibility is normatively
expanded or contracted.
3
The defendant was
supposed to have
tailgated a car and
stopped it forcibly on
the Tomei highway in
Japan. Then a dump
truck crashed into the
car and young couples
were killed.
The court recognized
a causal link between
his road rage and the
fatal accident.
4. (non-)identity problem
in causation and agencies
• Parfit (1983) presented the famous “non-identity problem.”
• According to him, our care to future beings will change their
genetic identity, and the original object will be vanished.
• This paradox has been regarded as a serious obstacle to
“person-affecting-principle-based” intergenerational theories.
• This paradox resulted from a conception of gene-based,
restricted human identity (inspired by Kripke).
• Our sense of identity (of person, causation, responsibility,
etc.) is expanded or contracted on a case by case basis.
• Particularly in fatal circumstances, it will be extremely
loosened.
4
However….
5. Purpose of this presentation
In keeping with it….
• Examining “intergenerational justice (for short, IJ )”
from a view of legal philosophy
• Can we justify our normative relation to future
generation, or non-existence ?
• If possible, then, how far? (distance of the “future”)
• The normative range problem has been often
dismissed in the discussion of IJ, but it matters.
5
6. Specific problems on IJ
• Sustainability of public pension system in aging society
(rather, intra-generational justice)
• Distribution of exhaustible resources (ex. fossil fuels)
• Climate justice on global warming
• Disposal of nuclear waste …..and so on.
• These issues have its own time (and regional) range.
• Is our obligation to future generations differ in each
range? Or, should it be temporally universal?
• These diachronic issues are intergenerational justice of
its own kind, not reducible to synchronic normative
theories. Why?
6
7. Particular problems of IJ
• In general, if the time distance of the normative
relation (here, present and future generations) is
extended, IJ will be more difficult.
• Why? – the features are uncertain and issue-relative
– Uncertainty of the number and identity of the
affected people in future [Parfit 1983]
– Changeability of the preferences of future people
– Priority problem with contemporary distributive
justice
7
8. Main proposals
• The distance of future generation should be
distinguished by each IJ issues.
• Our responsibility should be examined in
proportion as the generational agencies.
– Otherwise, the range problem still remains.
• Intergenerational justice is justice between
generational agencies distinguished by issues.
• Then, inquiring how to distinguish is our task.
8
9. Approach and institutional design
[Approach]
• Showing the theoretical limits of reciprocal/universal
approach in IJ with regard to range problem
• Adapting one-way approach (ex. Jonas’s
responsibility) and articulating the ranges [Jonas 1979]
[Institutional design]
• Identifying the most appropriate legal branch for
each IJ issues [Vermeule 2014]
– Under what institutions, can we deliberate well on value
conflict issues, i.e. about disposal of nuclear waste?
9
10. Contemporary Circumstance:
From Kyoto to Paris
About 20 years later…
[Paris Agreement 2015]
• Now, preventing global warming is
understood not just as duty of
advanced countries but as universal
responsibility.
– Macron “Make our planet great again.”
10
[Kyoto Protocol 1997]
Compromise resolution of the conflict
among advanced and developing
countries
Ex. emissions trading system
11. Distribution problem?
• In Kyoto, multi-layer distribution justice was considered.
– [agents] present/future, advanced/developing…
– [issues] resources, pollution, and historical responsibility…
• The Paris scheme seems to deny these distribution
problems and to make IJ universal diachronically and
synchronically.
• Now, should our intergenerational responsibility not
solve our internal distribution problems, but sustain
humankind and this planet categorically?
I don’t think so.
11
12. Two conceptions of IJ:
Generational agencies
Ex. with regard to disposal of nuclear waste…
(1) Sustainable balance of benefit and burden
– The balance should be closed in each generation.
– If we, present generation, have gained benefit from
nuclear power, then we should take the burden of final
disposal of the waste, and should not postpone it to future
generation.
(2) Autonomy of each generation
– “Final disposal” is impossible for (present) technology.
– Then, IJ demands us to entrust it to future generation, and
in turn, to guarantee their autonomy condition.
12
Cf.[Teramoto 2011]
13. Time theoretical backgrounds
• The two IJ conceptions may correspond to particular time
perspective – presentism and eternalism.
[Conception 1] presentistic view
• important values : present freedom, self-decision, benefit
principle, etc.
• Democracy is often characterize as a present-centric regime.
– “We, the present people” should not be ruled by the dead or unborn.
[Conception 2] eternalistic view
• important values : integrity, continuity, prospectiveness
– Our political community exists of all the generations, the past, present,
and future.
13
14. Comparison:
As answers to future uncertainty
[Conception 1]
• The benefit principle is indeed intuition-suitable.
• However, generational relationship is not generally so
independent. Both benefit and burden are always postponed.
– On the nuclear waste problem, can we say that the circle
of benefit and burden is relatively closed?
[Conception 2]
• If we, present generation have obligation to guarantee the
autonomy conditions of future generations, how far?
• If the range problem is unsolved, we have to care infinite
future generations…? It is impossible.
– On the nuclear waste problem, can we decide the
responsibility-range on our technology level?
14
15. Is Intergenerational Reciprocity
Possible?
• “Reciprocity” is a key concept of synchronic normative theories,
typically in Rawls’s “justice as fairness.”
• Usually, intergenerational reciprocity is limited.
– Cf. Rawls’s saving principle
• Three types of reciprocity:
1. Near future generation: overlapping?
2. Middle future generation: fairness?
3. Distant future generation: purely one-way?
15
16. Possibility of
inter-generational democracy
• Present-centric feature of democracy always bothers IJ.
• But we should make collective decisions about IJ.
– “Choosing not to choose” is may be the worst choice…
16
[Gerontocracy / Silver democracy]
Can we cooperate with all generations
about IJ problems under extreme
population imbalance?
There are so many severe value conflicts
on intergenerational issues.
Can we avoid “polarization”?
17. IJ and democratic legitimacy
• Justness (scientific, moral, or…?) and democratic
legitimacy may be distinguished.
• Democratic legitimacy generally depends on
everyday updating acceptance and convincing.
– [Conception 2] emphasizes the long-term uncertainty of
technology with regard to IJ, and lay weight of the value of
legitimacy rather than scientific justness.
– However, the excessive emphasis of uncertainty may
undermine our moral consensus. It may be risky in the
“Post Truth” era.
• Ex. Backlash to climate change…
17
18. Conclusions
• On IJ, there are many different issues. Universal justification
may impose impossible burden on us.
• The issues should be distinguished by its characteristics,
conceptions of IJ, our technology level, or contemporary
distributional justice...
• These distinction may help us to discuss IJ issues on proper
scale, and to make ourselves accountable agencies.
• Based on this, we can design the appropriate deliberation.
– Ex. On the choice of the site of disposal of nuclear waste
– To avoid excessive interest-conflict, another value may be helpful.
18