The webinar is being presented by Professor Becky Malby and Liz Maddocks-Brown. Prof. Malby has experience in systems innovation, organizational change, and leadership development in both the public and private sectors in the UK and internationally. Liz Maddocks-Brown has over 30 years of experience in the public sector, especially leading organizational change initiatives in the NHS. The webinar will focus on what it takes to be an effective network leader, exploring topics like the roles and responsibilities of network leadership, facilitating peer relationships, and sustaining networks over time. Participants will be encouraged to ask questions in the chat box.
June 4, 2015 | 11am-12pm Pacific
Session Description:
We are launching a webinar series to provide a space for practitioners and researchers in both the leadership and network development areas to connect and learn from each other. Often these groups are not connected and we want to build awareness and even collaboration across the research – practice divide. We will focus on the intersection of leadership and network development. After clarifying the various ways in which leadership and networks intersect, we will consider the following questions: what does it mean for people in networks who see the need to be more intentional about developing leadership, and what does it mean for leadership development practitioners to design and deliver programs that better equip their participants to effectively utilize network strategies and tools.
This first webinar will start to explore the intersection between leadership and networks, and introduce a relational perspective of leadership. The three partnering organizations will discuss concrete examples and ideas from their work, and then participants will have a chance to ask questions.
Register for this first webinar with The Center for Creative Leadership, NYU/Wagner, and The Leadership Learning Community
This second webinar in the Network Leadership Webinar Series is brought to you by the Center for Creative Leadership, NYU Wagner, and the Leadership Learning Community.
Presenting is Chris Ernst from Juniper Networks.
In this third webinar of the Network Leadership Series, Professor Angel Saz-Carranza will explore the question of how formal networks of organizations, created to reach a collective goal (also known as goal-directed networks), work to support the overarching network goals. Goal-directed networks often create a separate organizational unit to broker and administer the network as a whole called Network Administrative Organizations (NAOs).
The webinar will answer questions like:
How organizational units lead and broker the work of network members to ensure that the network as a whole achieves a collective network goal. finds the direction it needs, aligns the activities of its members, and helps them stay committed and ready to collaborate
How leadership strategies are different when the work is not internal to a single organization
Drawing from the work of immigration coalitions in the U.S. as examples of an important type of network, Saz-Carranza unpacks the leadership dynamics of formal goal-directed networks. These network member organizations join together to accomplish a common goal that is different from each organizational member but that contributes to advance their individual missions.
We recently posted the Leadership and Race synthesis and are working with the writing partners to develop the publication. The Leadership and Networks synthesis outline has also been posted. We would like to engage you in discussion and questions that can strengthen these publications.
The Greenlining Institute was founded as a response to institutional redlining of communities of color from economic opportunities. Twenty-two years later, the organization has grown in both scale and impact, including incorporating a strong commitment to the leadership development of emerging leaders of color. With its successes and challenges, Greenlining has learned many lessons on the road to positive social change. This webinar will focus on how the organization has evolved and created a renowned leadership development program for social justice leaders, while always maintaining its roots in racial equity and advocacy. In using the organization’s journey as a case study, participants will receive a perspective and best practices for incorporating a leadership development program from foundation to evaluation.
June 4, 2015 | 11am-12pm Pacific
Session Description:
We are launching a webinar series to provide a space for practitioners and researchers in both the leadership and network development areas to connect and learn from each other. Often these groups are not connected and we want to build awareness and even collaboration across the research – practice divide. We will focus on the intersection of leadership and network development. After clarifying the various ways in which leadership and networks intersect, we will consider the following questions: what does it mean for people in networks who see the need to be more intentional about developing leadership, and what does it mean for leadership development practitioners to design and deliver programs that better equip their participants to effectively utilize network strategies and tools.
This first webinar will start to explore the intersection between leadership and networks, and introduce a relational perspective of leadership. The three partnering organizations will discuss concrete examples and ideas from their work, and then participants will have a chance to ask questions.
Register for this first webinar with The Center for Creative Leadership, NYU/Wagner, and The Leadership Learning Community
This second webinar in the Network Leadership Webinar Series is brought to you by the Center for Creative Leadership, NYU Wagner, and the Leadership Learning Community.
Presenting is Chris Ernst from Juniper Networks.
In this third webinar of the Network Leadership Series, Professor Angel Saz-Carranza will explore the question of how formal networks of organizations, created to reach a collective goal (also known as goal-directed networks), work to support the overarching network goals. Goal-directed networks often create a separate organizational unit to broker and administer the network as a whole called Network Administrative Organizations (NAOs).
The webinar will answer questions like:
How organizational units lead and broker the work of network members to ensure that the network as a whole achieves a collective network goal. finds the direction it needs, aligns the activities of its members, and helps them stay committed and ready to collaborate
How leadership strategies are different when the work is not internal to a single organization
Drawing from the work of immigration coalitions in the U.S. as examples of an important type of network, Saz-Carranza unpacks the leadership dynamics of formal goal-directed networks. These network member organizations join together to accomplish a common goal that is different from each organizational member but that contributes to advance their individual missions.
We recently posted the Leadership and Race synthesis and are working with the writing partners to develop the publication. The Leadership and Networks synthesis outline has also been posted. We would like to engage you in discussion and questions that can strengthen these publications.
The Greenlining Institute was founded as a response to institutional redlining of communities of color from economic opportunities. Twenty-two years later, the organization has grown in both scale and impact, including incorporating a strong commitment to the leadership development of emerging leaders of color. With its successes and challenges, Greenlining has learned many lessons on the road to positive social change. This webinar will focus on how the organization has evolved and created a renowned leadership development program for social justice leaders, while always maintaining its roots in racial equity and advocacy. In using the organization’s journey as a case study, participants will receive a perspective and best practices for incorporating a leadership development program from foundation to evaluation.
Growing numbers of social change agents are building networks to increase impact. Using real-life case examples, this webinar offers an introduction to basic network concepts and approaches with an emphasis on how practitioners can strengthen their network through systematic monitoring and evaluation. Highlights from a recent framing paper and casebook developed by Network Impact and the Center for Evaluation Innovation include examples of leading evaluation frameworks and practical methods/tools.
Shared Leadership Lean Framework combines Agile Leadership, Lean Startup and Open Kanban to enable innovation and visionary leadership in an organization play in harmony with management restrictions and policies.
Its aims at boosting potential of any organization and stay ahead of competition.
Webinar Presentation: Why Community Leadership MattersRECODE
Wednesday July 6 at 12:00pm
What is leadership, and why does it matter to communities, societies and nations?
Webinar with Mount Royal University's James Stauch and Lesley Cornelisse to discuss their recently released report Strengthening Community Leadership Learning: Results of a Canada-wide research project on leadership learning for social change. James and Lesley discuss their research into Canadian leadership development programs as they relate to community development, social innovation, environmental systems, and social change.
More info: re-code.ca/en/whats_happening/159
Many networks organize governance and operations with structures that mirror those of organizations: governing boards, committees, and operations staff. Unfortunately, these structures have often been a bad fit with networks, leading to decreased involvement and engagement by network participants who aren't on the governing board and shrinking network size and impact.
More and more networks are experimenting with and co-creating innovative network governance and structures that are self-organizing, encouraging and supporting the formation of collaborative circles for many or all of the operations and coordination functions of the network.
June Holley will share examples and offer several checklists and strategy worksheets to help your network determine if these new structures might be appropriate for them.
Communities of Practice: Principles and TipsStan Garfield
Presentation on April 11, 2014 to Columbia University’s Master of Science in Information and Knowledge Strategy (IKNS) Program in the School of Professional Studies
Working in networked ways is fundamentally different than traditional ways of working. Organizations can commit to a network approach yet not fully realize all the pieces and behaviors needed to make it actually work.
Carole Martin and Beth Tener will share their insights as coaches/facilitators with a wide range of social change network initiatives. They'll explore what they have been learning about which networks get traction and grow and which ones stumble, related to these themes:
What does organization readiness to embrace the network approach "look like"? How do board and staff members organize their time, priorities, and mindset differently?
How does leading look different both within and outside your organization?
What are some key pitfalls and lessons learned that you can keep in mind as you design for a more inclusive, joyous and connected way of working?
If your organization is pursuing networked ways of working, considering going this route or are on your way and hitting some bumps in the road, this will be a helpful conversation to participate in and invite in colleagues who are still learning.
Authors Ulla de Stricker, Cynthia (Cindy) Shamel, Connie Crosby, and Constance Ard presented this overview on February 25, 2014 to a Community of Practice via webinar. The slides summarize key points from the recently published book Knowledge Management Practice in Organizations: The View from Inside.
Designing an Effective Knowledge Partnership ProcessOlivier Serrat
Knowledge partnerships are about joint purpose in the identification, creation, storage, sharing, and use of knowledge; sadly, the state of the art in creating, managing, monitoring, and evaluating them remains immature.
Yes, I still do KM and KM is not dead. I thought I would share the basic deck that I use in workshops that are part of my KM Assessment and Strategy consulting practice. In addition to interviews, surveys, and inventories, it is important during a KM assessment to educate and engage the organization.
Knowledge partnerships are about joint generation and sharing of knowledge; sadly, the state of the art in creating, managing, monitoring, and evaluating them remains immature. This presentation explains how one can design knowledge partnerships better.
Follow these steps:
1. Identify the current culture and values of your organization
2. Understand why people don’t share their knowledge
3. Help them see why they should share their knowledge
4. Overcome reluctance to ask for help
5. Increase trust
6. Work out loud
7.Create a vision of the culture you want
8. Get executives to lead by example
9. Motivate knowledge sharing
10. Reuse good examples of other organizations
“The concept of knowledge sharing is important because it helps individuals and businesses be more agile and adaptable in the face of change and helps ensure continued growth and survival.”
- Seta A. Wicaksana, 2021
Building a Coalition (The Woodson Foundation)AN_Rajin
The case focus on nonprofit social organization called The Woodson foundation who wants to build a cohesive coalition among its stake holders who are the Washington DC School and The NCPIE. They want to create an after school program where they faced several types of problem. The background of this case is Nonattendance of students, Crime, high teacher turn over and group development.
The main objective of this case is that, The Woodson foundation wants to improve students’ performance and outcomes. Reducing crime increasing student’s attendance and decreasing teacher’s turnover ratio through After School program. For this they create two team, one is Development team and another is Program team.
Growing numbers of social change agents are building networks to increase impact. Using real-life case examples, this webinar offers an introduction to basic network concepts and approaches with an emphasis on how practitioners can strengthen their network through systematic monitoring and evaluation. Highlights from a recent framing paper and casebook developed by Network Impact and the Center for Evaluation Innovation include examples of leading evaluation frameworks and practical methods/tools.
Shared Leadership Lean Framework combines Agile Leadership, Lean Startup and Open Kanban to enable innovation and visionary leadership in an organization play in harmony with management restrictions and policies.
Its aims at boosting potential of any organization and stay ahead of competition.
Webinar Presentation: Why Community Leadership MattersRECODE
Wednesday July 6 at 12:00pm
What is leadership, and why does it matter to communities, societies and nations?
Webinar with Mount Royal University's James Stauch and Lesley Cornelisse to discuss their recently released report Strengthening Community Leadership Learning: Results of a Canada-wide research project on leadership learning for social change. James and Lesley discuss their research into Canadian leadership development programs as they relate to community development, social innovation, environmental systems, and social change.
More info: re-code.ca/en/whats_happening/159
Many networks organize governance and operations with structures that mirror those of organizations: governing boards, committees, and operations staff. Unfortunately, these structures have often been a bad fit with networks, leading to decreased involvement and engagement by network participants who aren't on the governing board and shrinking network size and impact.
More and more networks are experimenting with and co-creating innovative network governance and structures that are self-organizing, encouraging and supporting the formation of collaborative circles for many or all of the operations and coordination functions of the network.
June Holley will share examples and offer several checklists and strategy worksheets to help your network determine if these new structures might be appropriate for them.
Communities of Practice: Principles and TipsStan Garfield
Presentation on April 11, 2014 to Columbia University’s Master of Science in Information and Knowledge Strategy (IKNS) Program in the School of Professional Studies
Working in networked ways is fundamentally different than traditional ways of working. Organizations can commit to a network approach yet not fully realize all the pieces and behaviors needed to make it actually work.
Carole Martin and Beth Tener will share their insights as coaches/facilitators with a wide range of social change network initiatives. They'll explore what they have been learning about which networks get traction and grow and which ones stumble, related to these themes:
What does organization readiness to embrace the network approach "look like"? How do board and staff members organize their time, priorities, and mindset differently?
How does leading look different both within and outside your organization?
What are some key pitfalls and lessons learned that you can keep in mind as you design for a more inclusive, joyous and connected way of working?
If your organization is pursuing networked ways of working, considering going this route or are on your way and hitting some bumps in the road, this will be a helpful conversation to participate in and invite in colleagues who are still learning.
Authors Ulla de Stricker, Cynthia (Cindy) Shamel, Connie Crosby, and Constance Ard presented this overview on February 25, 2014 to a Community of Practice via webinar. The slides summarize key points from the recently published book Knowledge Management Practice in Organizations: The View from Inside.
Designing an Effective Knowledge Partnership ProcessOlivier Serrat
Knowledge partnerships are about joint purpose in the identification, creation, storage, sharing, and use of knowledge; sadly, the state of the art in creating, managing, monitoring, and evaluating them remains immature.
Yes, I still do KM and KM is not dead. I thought I would share the basic deck that I use in workshops that are part of my KM Assessment and Strategy consulting practice. In addition to interviews, surveys, and inventories, it is important during a KM assessment to educate and engage the organization.
Knowledge partnerships are about joint generation and sharing of knowledge; sadly, the state of the art in creating, managing, monitoring, and evaluating them remains immature. This presentation explains how one can design knowledge partnerships better.
Follow these steps:
1. Identify the current culture and values of your organization
2. Understand why people don’t share their knowledge
3. Help them see why they should share their knowledge
4. Overcome reluctance to ask for help
5. Increase trust
6. Work out loud
7.Create a vision of the culture you want
8. Get executives to lead by example
9. Motivate knowledge sharing
10. Reuse good examples of other organizations
“The concept of knowledge sharing is important because it helps individuals and businesses be more agile and adaptable in the face of change and helps ensure continued growth and survival.”
- Seta A. Wicaksana, 2021
Building a Coalition (The Woodson Foundation)AN_Rajin
The case focus on nonprofit social organization called The Woodson foundation who wants to build a cohesive coalition among its stake holders who are the Washington DC School and The NCPIE. They want to create an after school program where they faced several types of problem. The background of this case is Nonattendance of students, Crime, high teacher turn over and group development.
The main objective of this case is that, The Woodson foundation wants to improve students’ performance and outcomes. Reducing crime increasing student’s attendance and decreasing teacher’s turnover ratio through After School program. For this they create two team, one is Development team and another is Program team.
Communities of practice have become an accepted part of organizational development. One should pay attention to domain, membership, norms and rules, structure and process, flow of energy, results, resources, and values.
Creating Learning Environments with Communities of PracticeOlivier Serrat
Communities of practice have become an accepted part of organizational development. One should pay attention to domain, membership, norms and rules, structure and process, flow of energy, results, resources, and values.
Key success factors for Change Champions- Change Community of Practice Webina...Catherine Smithson
Discover the key success factors for Change Champions, drawing from our consulting team's experience and Prosci's 2016 Best Practices in Change Management Report.
Transferring learning from the classroom to the workplace finalRichard Fryer
A case study of learning programs at Energex, a Queensland-based electricity distributor. The main emphasis is on building mindsets, not skills to drive energy and enthusiasm for learning, and ultimately a return on the learning investment.
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
Global launch of the Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index 2nd wave – alongside...ILC- UK
The Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index is an online tool created by ILC that ranks countries on six metrics including, life span, health span, work span, income, environmental performance, and happiness. The Index helps us understand how well countries have adapted to longevity and inform decision makers on what must be done to maximise the economic benefits that comes with living well for longer.
Alongside the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva on 28 May 2024, we launched the second version of our Index, allowing us to track progress and give new insights into what needs to be done to keep populations healthier for longer.
The speakers included:
Professor Orazio Schillaci, Minister of Health, Italy
Dr Hans Groth, Chairman of the Board, World Demographic & Ageing Forum
Professor Ilona Kickbusch, Founder and Chair, Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute and co-chair, World Health Summit Council
Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat, Director, Country Health Policies and Systems Division, World Health Organisation EURO
Dr Marta Lomazzi, Executive Manager, World Federation of Public Health Associations
Dr Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare and Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum
Dr Karin Tegmark Wisell, Director General, Public Health Agency of Sweden
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
2. Who is presenting the
webinar today?
Liz Maddocks-Brown has over 30 years experience in the public and
commercial sector, as a senior manager specialising in business
management, organisational change, innovation and improvement learning
and development. Over the last 25 years, her career in the NHS has focused
on leading major organisational change at national, regional and local level,
both in provider and commissioning organisations. Working in the
Sustainable Improvement Team , NHS England, her current portfolio
consists of faculty and network development, accelerated large and small
scale event facilitation, OD consulting, capability building design and delivery,
leadership and board development, executive coaching and action learning
for senior leaders.
Prof. Becky Malby has a track record in systems innovation, organisational
change and leadership development, both in the UK and internationally, in
leading networks. Her experience is an unusual combination of leader,
manager, researcher, change agent and entrepreneur. She is known to be an
energetic and enthusiastic leader of change and a forward thinker. Becky has
a track record in organisational and leadership development in the public
sector, working primarily with the NHS and with local authorities in the UK
and Europe.
3. Support the delivery of
the
Five Year Forward View
Support the wider NHS
system to make
transformational
improvement
The Sustainable Improvement Team key priorities:
4. Reflects today’s unique health
and care landscape and
challenges
Provides a vital and
comprehensive round-up of all
the latest thinking, practical
approaches and tools to
advance large scale change
programmes.
Download the interactive pdf guide and executive summary, visit:
www.england.nhs.uk/largescalechange
Join the conversation #LargeScaleChange
Source4Networks and networks supporting sustainable large change
and improvement
5. Lead, champion and support the
effective use of networks to drive
improvement and transformational
change
Provide access to tools,
diagnostics, resources and expertise
to strengthen, improve and sustain
network impact
Support network leaders to
confidently lead their networks, in a
complex and ever changing and
challenging environment
Sustainable Improvement our Network specialism and focus
8. The webinars will take place 15:00 to 16:00 (UK time) on the
following dates:
16 October 2017 What does it take to be a network leader?
27 November 2017 Creating value and impact in networks
11 December 2017Sustaining your network
https://www.source4networks.org.uk/resources/events/89-network-leadership-webex-
series
Network Leadership Webinar Series
10. The Webinar Content
:What does it take to be a Network Leader:
• Network leadership, how to do it, what to
pay attention to and how to transition
into being a Network Leader.
• We also explore the relationship
between network leader and members
and wider stakeholders.
12. Transitions and Challenges
From To
Individual Population
Increase Access Reduce Demand
Consumers Partners
Hunch Evidence based decision-making
Top Down Self-managed teams
Hierarchies Networks
Expert Learning
13. What are you curious about
today?
Respond on your own in the chat box
17. Networks:
• Clarifying shared purpose (what
can we only do together that we
can’t do on our own)
• Equal peer relationships based on
generosity and reciprocity
• Requests and offers (not
necessarily on the same issue)
• Actively seeking diversity
• Clear rules of engagement
(membership)
• Peer working and review
• Member resourcefulness and
mutual trust
• Trying things out iteratively
Useful For:
• Generating creative and
innovative solutions
• Rapid learning and
development
• Amplifying the effectiveness
of individual members
21. The distinctiveness of Networks
lies in:
• Their ability to be innovative and creative and their
reliance on diversity
• The distribution of power and leadership across
members
• Reciprocity and exchange as the defining relationship
between members based on mutual interest around a
common purpose
• Fluctuations in their member engagement and impact
• Their adaptability to survive and thrive
• The centrality of the knowledge function
22. Difference between Hierarchy
and Network Leadership
Hierarchy
• Position, Authority
• Individual
• Control
• Directive
• Transactional
• Top Down
Network
• Role, Behaviour
• Collective
• Facilitative
• Distributed
• Relational / Collective
• Peer
23. Network Leadership is:
• Facilitative
• Distributed
• Democratic and inclusive
• Whilst making the most of difference for creative ends.
Networks need to be managed but in collaborative,
non-hierarchical ways.
Leading in Networks
24. Networks Work When:
• There is clear shared purpose and identity
• They are creative and innovative
• They meet member needs
• They are supported by adapted leadership
• They have strong relationships and ties
• They generate helpful outputs
25. Key Questions for Network Leaders:
• Are members engaged?
• Are members’ preferences and needs reflected
in the network’s activity?
• Are the relationships truly reciprocal?
• How is the collective purpose changing over
time?
• How is the network assessing its impact?
Network Leaders need to focus persistently on
purpose, membership and impact
26. Network Leadership Requires:
• Brokerage & Spanning boundaries
• Working with knowledge
• Maintaining a constant dialogue with members of the
network & Facilitating peer relationships
• Modelling transparency, commitment and mutual
respect
• Good negotiation skills and being comfortable with
conflict and difference
• Ability to handle ambiguity and uncertainty
• Able to act as teacher/mentor
27. Networks Fail because of:
• Fails to reach common understanding across members of
purpose and direction
• Institutionalisation,
• Mistakes in initial design
• Over-management cementing relationships and structures
that need to be dynamic and evolving,
• Over expectation of network member’s willingness or
ability to collaborate which damages creativity of the parts
• Predicating some members over others
• Constraining network member’s independence
• Not recognising when leadership needs to change / rotate
• Lack of impact in terms of network member’s purpose
28. What does a Network Leader do?
Key Roles:
Facilitates relationships – secures other leaders
Knowledge management – filtering
Communication – amplifying
Catalyses and enables impact
Plans for sustainability or demise
29. Roles in Networks
Arena M et al (2017) How to Catalyze Innovation in Your
Organization. HBR Summer 2017 June 13.
30. Facilitates Peer Relationships
• Creates conditions for diversity to be valued and
conflict to be useful
• Connects members to each other
• Designs network meetings based on dialogue
31. Knowledge Management
A network needs data, information and intelligence
around which to work and learn.
It will generate new knowledge around the learning
focus and the structures and processes that
support it.
A network leader will be proactive in identifying and
accessing knowledge sources within and beyond
the network.
Andrew Constable 2016
32. Knowledge Management
How will participants in the network know where and how
to access information?
Who will decide what is relevant or appropriate or
accessible?
How will new data, information and intelligence come into
the network?
How will you ensure that everyone in the network has
access to the information?
Who will decide what to share and how? Who will quality
assure?
Andrew Constable 2016
33. Communication
• Securing a process for generating collective
intelligence in relation to purpose
• Generating a brand and messaging to secure visibility
externally
• Providing a platform for members to access each
other
• Acts as interpreter – credible with diverse members
“Rather than coming up with a comprehensive plan or strategy at
the outset, networks tend to thrive on constant, dynamic
iterations based on changes in context and new knowledge that
develops through action. So, developing mechanisms for regular
‘in-course adjustments’ to keep action relevant and fresh is a
crucial leadership task.”
Murray Anderson-Wallace”
34. Catalyses Impact
• Secures processes for capturing impact
• Enables the visibility of impact
“Networks shouldn’t fear the instinct to follow their nose
and their drive for change. It’s the fundamentals that
matter: know what you’re trying to achieve and how you’re
going to measure the impact you’ve had. Without this, how
do you know you’ve done what you set out to do? And how
do you convince others of the value that your network
brings?”
Ginny Edwards
35. Sustainability
Sustainability is secured through effective member
participation, securing impact and securing
resources.
The latter requires the considered attention of the
network leader and a sub group of members
NCL - Leading Networks Leading the System
36. NL Practices
• Ways of exploring, promoting and expanding existing common
ground for action
• Emphasising what can be achieved together even though different
power, knowledge and purposes (as well as similarities) might be
present.
• Making the connections between ‘talk’ and the consequent individual
and collective actions, more publicly accessible and locally
coherent..
• Bringing to collective attention the interdependencies of
stakeholders in complex work and learning communities.
• Devolving formal ‘rule-making’ to reflect the ‘real’ distribution of
power and knowledge in a complex community of practice,
harnessing local know-how to inform practice developments.
• Warranting movement, speed and local action to balance stasis,
caution and bureaucratic consensus.
• (Malby and Anderson Wallace 2016)
37.
38. Leadership Over Time
“A change in leadership style is often required
between the early stages of setting up a
network and leading a more established or
mature network. The former needs an
enthusiastic, energising approach to get things
off the ground, and to mobilise others. But the
latter is about facilitating and supporting other
network members, and responding or adapting
to emerging needs and opportunities.”
Andrew Constable
39. Maturity Matrix - Network Leadership
• Leadership is shared seamlessly between several members, who
have time and support to carry out the role effectively.
Level 5
• Leaders are engaged and have the requisite skills and dedicated
time to fulfil the role. A core team of committed participants
supports the facilitation and leadership activities.
Level 4
• The network has a credible leader/ facilitator in place, with
dedicated time available for the role. Other members of the
network support the leader informally.
Level 3
• A leader or facilitator for the network has emerged or been
appointed, but with little or no dedicated time. Response to
events and requests is mixed, usually coming from a small sub-set
of the network.
Level 2
• The network continues to bump along without clear leadership,
operating on the best endeavours of a few. Participation a spare-
time activity and responsiveness is somewhat hit-and- miss.
Level 1
41. Our Top Tips:
• Ensure that opportunities for members to get to know each
other personally are maximised
• Regularly do work to reveal expectations.
• Consensus should not a pre-condition for action
• Create a minimal design for your network.
• Recognise that networks form and reform continually in a
dynamic way.
• Remember that networks ebb and flow.
• “Breaking down barriers” is a fallacious aim.
• Remember that networks are not things that we create,
• Carefully consider and understand the relational dynamics
of your network.
42. Dr Miranda Wolpert
Miranda’s tips for network leaders:
• You’ll go down a lot of blind alleys, and that’s OK.
It’s good to model failure and to show that it’s not
a big deal.
• Resist being over-ambitious. Be very clear about
what is needed from your network.
• It’s the people that matter – not the perfect
website. So don’t put too much faith in technology.
• Communicate, communicate, communicate.
People will come in and out of the network, their
attention will peak and wane, they will forget
things. You cannot communicate enough.
Director Evidence Based Practice UCL
45. Actions
• Register
• Join community and the conversation:
• Webinar sign up: http://www.source4networks.org.uk/webinars
• Newsletter sign up
• If you are a network leader, once registered use diagnostics
Please complete the Exit Survey to help us improve
future webinars
Professor Becky Malby, Professor of Health Systems Innovation at London South Bank University and Liz Maddocks-Brown, A Senior Improvement Manager and network specialist in NHS England’s Sustainable Improvement Team
Becky is a and enthusiastic leader of change with a track record in organisational and leadership development in the public sector. Becky has a longstanding interest in networks – particularly in healthcare where she has quite literally written the book on it!
Liz is an experienced organisational development professional who has worked on leading change on regional and national programmes through which she has developed expertise in networked forms of organising for transformation and improvement.
This is where Sustainable Improvement Team, which sits as part of NHS England, as a stand of its work , takes a strong interest supporting network development and build network leadership capability, as it contributes to the achievement of NHS England's top 10 priorities and the delivery of the 5YFV
To support leaders deliver large scale transformational change, NHSE’s Sustainable Improvement team and the Horizons team have refreshed and updated the 2011 publication, Leading Large Scale Change: A Practical Guide, to reflect today’s unique health and care landscape and challenges.
The refreshed guide provides a vital and comprehensive round-up of all the latest thinking and practical approaches and tools that can be used in advancing large scale change programmes.
(HYPERLINK TO THE GUIDE WILL BE POSTED IN THE CHATBOX).
There will also be a 6 part webinar series supporting the guide launching this autumn. If you would like further information regarding the webinar series please email the Sustainable Improvement Team (EMAIL WILL BE IN THE CHATBOX).
And specially , the focus of our Team , which based on scoping, research and consultation with the service-our advisory and user group for this work - aims to……
This is where the Source4Nertworks platform comes in, in a parnerhsip with LSBU, based on pervious work in one of the improvement legacy bodies and the university of Leeds – the platform has been redesign and relaunched this summer and is designed to …..
This is the first of a series of webinars showcasing the platform.
The series of free webinars will explore key themes in network leadership designed to provide you with ‘know-how’ and insights into what it takes to lead networks, partnerships and collaborations in today’s highly connected and inter-dependent world of health and care.
The link to register for the events will be posted in the chatbox.
The whole system linked to population health outcomes (systems approach & inequalities) e.g. Intermountain
Reducing demand e.g. Nuka
Citizens as partners and collaborators -asset based approach to the whole system e.g. Leeds
Data science as a core capability – robust evidence and intelligence informed decision-making e.g. Intermountain
Adaptive teams taking full professional responsibility e.g. Buurtzorg
Working collaboratively in Networks e.g Jonkoping
CAtegorise
Networks are cooperative structures where an interconnected group coalesce around shared purpose where members act as peers based on reciprocity and trust.
Shared purpose and identity: members of effective networks display strong network awareness. They feel ownership and they know why the network exists. They are clear on shared purpose, which is compelling for their key ‘sponsors’ or stakeholders/members. They are focussed on issues that keep network leaders awake at night and therefore (in some way or another) are likely to receive support. Network members also share a common language and a collective narrative.
Meet member needs: while effective networks generally address big issues, they also have to be of day-to-day benefit to members in the network. They ultimately have to link back either to helping members to do their job or helping them to create a change they are passionate about.
Adapted leadership: leadership of networks is different to other forms of leadership. Power does not come from organisational hierarchy. Effective networks benefit from leaders that have well-developed skills and aptitudes that have the time to perform their role.
Strong relationships and ties: effective networks are characterised by strong personal relationships, high levels of trust and awareness between members. Leaders can play a key role in developing trust and a culture of sharing, with face-to-face events a key aspect in maintaining relationships and ties.
Generate helpful outputs: as well as ‘connecting people’, effective networks tend to generate outputs that are helpful to other network members. Outputs are often developed or co-created, based on experience ‘on the ground’.
Ways of exploring, promoting and expanding existing common ground for action – even if it is very limited to start with.
Emphasising what can be achieved together even though different power, knowledge and purposes (as well as similarities) might be present.
Making the connections between ‘talk’ (meetings, communications forums, media, informal exchange) and the consequent individual and collective actions, more publicly accessible and locally coherent. This also involves helping to shift more conversations from private to public.
Bringing to collective attention the interdependencies of stakeholders in complex work and learning communities.
Devolving formal ‘rule-making’ (policies, procedures, and processes) to reflect the ‘real’ distribution of power and knowledge in a complex community of practice, harnessing local know-how to inform practice developments.
Warranting movement, speed and local action to balance stasis, caution and bureaucratic consensus.
Ensure that opportunities for members to get to know each other personally are maximised (preferably sometimes face-to-face). This helps to build social capital, an essential ingredient of a well-functioning network.
Regularly do work to reveal expectations. Trust is built on people’s expectations of each being met consistently and reliably. But often our expectations are based on assumption rather than discussion. In these conditions it is not surprising that we often “miss each other” in the exchange. When hidden assumptions lead to failed expectation then trust inevitably it degraded. Over time this can be corrosive.
Consensus should not a pre-condition for action - You certainly don’t need everyone to agree with everything ahead of time. You need just enough agreement to get on with the next thing and then the next thing and so on.
Create a minimal design for your network, perhaps around a few core principles. Expect it to evolve in response to emergent needs and new knowledge and ideas, as well as to review of the network’s impact. The network will change over time and you should ensure that the “rules” evolve as part of the on-going conversation with and between members.
Recognise that networks form and reform continually in a dynamic way. Leadership emerges from different parts of the network for different work, and leadership of the whole is usually temporary. Networks organise through cooperation and peer based relationships. Leadership to establish a network is often different from that needed to sustain it. Network leaders need to focus persistently on membership and impact.
Remember that networks ebb and flow, and it is in their nature to thrive and then to cease. There are key design features that can make them more sustainable and more impactful. Go where the energy is and connect to people who share the concerns you have.
“Breaking down barriers” is a fallacious aim. We often hear people talking about the importance of this but our contention is creates the wrong tone and direction. Network leaders need to give attention to how to negotiate meaning and action across the boundaries, as it is the differences between us that are often the source of value.
Remember that networks are not things that we create, they are forms of relationship that already exist and that we can help to make more visible and strengthen.
Carefully consider and understand the relational dynamics of your network – Who gets to speak, when, about what and for how long? Who gets to fix the meaning of things? How do we negotiate differences in understanding and sense-making? These are the critical “traffic rules of interaction” (Goffman 1968), that mediate the way that human beings operate together in social groups. Build your leadership practices from a deep understanding of these dynamics. They will help you more than any toolkit or set of managerial rules.
So before we go, just a few reminders
Can you also help us improve these webinars by completing a very quick survey before you go