In early 2014 ORCID worked with F1000 and CASRAI to create a working group to look at Peer Review Activity and the fields use to describe it. These slides are from a recorded webinar where we discussed the background of the working group on peer review and how the group's work evolved into a standard set of fields for describing peer review activity. We reviewed how these fields are expressed and interpreted within the ORCID website and API, and reviewed the next steps for implementing an early adopter integration for this new functionality. Please also see our webpage about the Peer Review Early Adopter program at: orcid.org/content/peer-review-early-adopter-program

1. orcid.org
early adopter program
peer review
2015 may
laura paglione
technical director, ORCID
l.paglione@ORCID.org
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-6273

2. goals of this program
● provide working use case examples for peer
review with ORCID iDs
● enable immediate utility to researchers upon
ORCID release of peer review functionality
● highlight and promote our early adopters and
supporters
orcid.org
Early Adopter Program:
Peer Review

3. ORCID and peer review
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

4. peer review working group
• established february 2014
• recommendations published april 2014
• http://casrai.org/standards/subject-groups/peer-review-service
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

5. data model & citation standard
• PERSON: person who performed review & being
recognized for review activity.
• REVIEW: review itself. For blind or unshared reviews, may
be left blank.
• SUBJECT: subject of the review, i.e., the paper, grant, etc.
For blind or unshared reviews, may be left blank.
• ORGANIZATION: organization recognizing the person
for review activity, such as a publisher, association or funder.
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

6. rich review citation
• PERSON: Laura AD Paglione; http://orcid.org/
0000-0003-3188-6273; ROLE: reviewer
• REVIEW: TYPE: review; DOI: 20934/28.293; REVIEW
DATE: 2015-04; http://URLofReview.com
• SUBJECT: Title of Item Reviewed; Nature; journal article;
DOI: 20934/230.38920; http://URLofItemReviewed.com
• ORGANIZATION: Nature Publishing Group; publisher;
RINGGOLD ID: 53264
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

7. sparse review citation
• PERSON: Laura AD Paglione; http://orcid.org/
0000-0003-3188-6273; ROLE: reviewer**
• REVIEW: TYPE: review**
• SUBJECT: Nature**; journal article*
• ORGANIZATION: Nature Publishing Group; publisher;
RINGGOLD ID: 53264
* optional information
** optional, but recommended
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

8. on orcid.org – the fields (api only)
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

9. on orcid.org – the user interface
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

10. process flow – from your site
orcid.org
TO: Reviewer@email.com
FROM: Grateful Journal
Thank you for reviewing this
article. Would you like to be
recognized on your ORCID
Record?
Your Site
</>
determine reviewer
format API call
your site sends review
activity to the ORCID record
your site
asks for
permission
ORCID
sends info
(and the
user) to
your site

11. process flow – from ORCID wizard
orcid.org
Your Site
</>
determine reviewer
format API call
your site sends review
activity to the ORCID record
ORCID
initiates
permission
request
ORCID
sends info
(and the
user) to
your site
LINK PEER REVIEW
Grateful Journal
Grateful Journal recognizes peer
reviewers on ORCID records...
Other Journal
Add your review activity to your
record

12. process flow – already have permission
orcid.org
Your Site
</>
determine reviewer
format API call
if so, your site sends review
activity to the ORCID record
check if you already have
stored permission
?
have permission?

13. communications
orcid.org
PHOTO: suessian megaphone
www.flickr.com/photos/theparadigmshifter/470341923

14. communications – what we will do
• joint news release deployed to our media contact list
• social marketing (Twitter, Facebook and, shortly, LinkedIn):
we will @ mention you
• blog post on ORCID.org (include quotes from someone
from your organization if desired)
• promotion at conferences we attend / speak at
orcid.org
PHOTO: suessian megaphone
www.flickr.com/photos/theparadigmshifter/470341923

15. communications – what you can do
• keep us updated on your progress / coordinate peer
review launch date with ours
• provide feedback on the peer review API and UI to the
ORCID team
• share example workflows, code libraries, end-user
communications for peer review with the community
• liaise re marketing efforts
• share endorsements / feedback from your stakeholders
orcid.org
PHOTO: suessian megaphone
www.flickr.com/photos/theparadigmshifter/470341923

16. next steps
• join & participate in the peer review early adopters forum
• respond to forum question–expected launch date?
• respond to forum question–planned early application?
• review the tech “getting started” document for links to the
API and example workflows
• respond to Alice’s requests for more information about
your communication plans
orcid.org
PHOTO: Peer Review, https://flic.kr/p/bgepei
Source: Research to Action www.researchtoaction.org/reviewing-peer-review

17. thank you
● ALICE: a.meadows@orcid.org
● LAURA: l.paglione@orcid.org
orcid.org