2. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
2
3. HEALTHY CAROLINIANS OF ORANGE COUNTY
• A network of community members and service
providers partnering to promote health and wellness
in Orange County
• Members are representatives from schools, human
service agencies, churches, civic groups, businesses,
local government, UNC Chapel Hill, health care
organizations including UNC Healthcare, and
concerned citizens.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
3
4. • Mission is to advocate, guide and assist Orange
County in planning and implementing health care
strategies to promote healthy lifestyles, improve
health status and prevent premature death and injury
for ALL residents in the county regardless of age,
race, income, or educational level.
• Overall goal of the partnership is to reduce health
disparities
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
4
HEALTHY CAROLINIANS OF ORANGE COUNTY
5. • What We Do
Build and promote collaborative partnerships
Guide local planning efforts to improve health
Support innovative health programs
Advocate for health-promoting policies
Identify critical health needs in the community
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
5
HEALTHY CAROLINIANS OF ORANGE COUNTY
6. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
6
7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
• Thanks to the residents of Orange County,
Community Health Assessment Team members, and
all Healthy Carolinians partners and member
agencies who helped to guide and make the
assessment a true community process.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
7
8. COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT: OVERVIEW
• Required of all NC Health Departments every 4 years
• Collaborative process with multiple stages
Over 50 Leadership Team members
Nearly 150 community survey volunteers
30+ document writers
Close to 200 forum participants
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
8
9. COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT: GOALS
• Enable local public health officials/community groups
to
Monitor trends in health status
Identify priorities among health issues
Determine the availability of resources
• Document
Useful, relevant, actionable, reflective, forward-
looking
• Information gathered lays the foundation for effective,
strategic community health planning
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
9
10. HEALTH ASSESSMENT PROCESS: PHASES
Phase 1: Establish Community Assessment Team
Phase 2: Collect Community Data
Phase 3: Collect and Analyze Community Health Statistics
Phase 4: Combine County Statistics and Community Data
Phase 5: Solicit Community Input to Select Health
Priorities
Phase 6: Create Community Health Assessment
Document
Phase 7: Disseminate CHA Document to the Community
Phase 8: Develop the Community Health Action Plans
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
10
11. DATA SOURCES AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• Both primary and secondary data sources
• Community Involvement
Various roles
Involvement at every stage
Planning
Data collection
Identification of health issues, community
strengths
Development of strategies to address problems
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
11
12. • Community Health
Opinion Survey
• Survey households
sampled from census
blocks with high
poverty percentage
• Administered in
multiple languages
• Covered various
topics
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
12
QUANTITATIVE: HEALTH OPINION SURVEY
13. QUALITATIVE: FOCUS GROUPS AND FORUMS
• Nine focus groups
Gain well-rounded understanding of health concerns
Nearly 70 community voices
• Five community forums
Almost 200 participants
Presented and discussed main data findings
Selected initial priorities
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
13
15. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
15
16. COMMUNITY PROFILE: DEMOGRAPHICS
• Population has more than doubled in past four
decades
Total: 57,567 (1970) to 133,801 (2010)
About a 5.8% rate of increase every ten years
• Age
Median: 33 years old
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
16
Age and Percent of Total Population
(2010)
Age Group Percent
Under 5 years 5.1%
Under 18 years 20.9%
Under 25 years 39.1%
Between 25-65
years
51.3%
65 years or older 9.6%
17. COMMUNITY PROFILE: DEMOGRAPHICS
• Gender
52.2% female / 47.8% male
• Rural/Urban
57% of residents live in southern “urban” areas of Chapel
Hill and Carrboro
43% live throughout rural areas
• Diversity
Race and ethnicity
Country of origin
Languages
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
17
18. COMMUNITY PROFILE: DEMOGRAPHICS
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
18
Race and Ethnicity Demographics, Percent of Total Population
NC
Orange
County
Carrbor
o
Chapel
Hill
Hillsborou
gh
White 68.5 74.4 70.9 72.8 62.9
Black 21.5 11.9 10.1 9.7 29.5
Hispanic or
Latino of any
race
8.4 8.2 13.8 6.4 6.6
Asian 2.2 6.7 8.2 11.9 1.7
American Indian
and Alaska
Native
1.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6
Native Hawaiian
and Other
Pacific Islander
0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Some other race 4.3 4.0 7.5 2.7 3.3
Two or more
races
2.2 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.1
19. PROFILE: LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
19
Leading Causes of Death in Orange County,
% and Number, 2005-2009
OC
Rank
Cause of Death
OC
%
NC
%
OC
#
NC #
1 Cancer 24.6 22.8 859 86,246
2 Diseases of heart 21.2 23.0 742 86,920
3 Cerebrovascular diseases 5.5 6.0 191 22,600
4
Chronic lower respiratory
diseases
4.4 5.6 155 21,228
5 All other unintentional injuries 2.9 3.4 100 12,896
6 Influenza and pneumonia 2.7 2.3 96 8,632
7 Alzheimer's disease 2.2 3.3 78 12,386
8 Motor vehicle injuries 2.1 2.1 74 8,027
9 Diabetes mellitus 2.0 2.9 69 10,906
10 Intentional self-harm (suicide) 1.5 NA 51 NA
20. PROFILE: DEATH RATES, AGE ADJUSTED
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
20
Age-adjusted death rates (per 100,000 population)
Orange County and NC, 2005-2009
OC Rank Cause of Death
OC
Rate
NC
Rate
1 Cancer 158.4 185.6
2 Diseases of Heart 141.8 191.7
3 Cerebrovascular Disease 37.2 50.5
4
Chronic Lower Respiratory
Diseases
30.7 47.0
5 Pneumonia and Influenza 18.6 19.4
6 Alzheimer's disease 17.5 28.3
7 All Other Unintentional Injuries 17.2 28.6
8 Diabetes Mellitus 14.5 23.6
9 Suicide 12.8 12.0
10
Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome,
and Nephrosis
12.1 18.7
21. PROFILE: LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
21
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Percent
of
Total
Deaths
Top-5 Leading Causes of Death
Orange County, %, by Year, 2005-2009
Cancer
Diseases of heart
Cerebrovascular
diseases
Chronic lower
respiratory diseases
All other unintentional
injuries
22. PROFILE: LEADING CAUSES OF HOSPITALIZATION
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
22
Leading Causes of Hospitalization
Orange County and North Carolina, 2009
Cause
OC
%
NC %
Other diagnoses (incl. mental disorders) 16.6 10.1
Cardio-vascular and circulatory diseases 16.4 19.3
Pregnancy and childbirth 16.1 15.7
Digestive system diseases 11.3 11
Injuries and poisoning 10.7 9.4
Respiratory diseases 8.2 11.8
Musculo-skeletal system diseases 7.7 6.9
Genito-urinary diseases 4.6 5.4
Endocrine, metabolic and nutritional
diseases
4.2 4.7
Malignant neoplasms 4.2 NA
Symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions NA 5.7
23. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
23
24. HEALTH DISPARITIES
• Health depends largely on
Economic status, income
Race/ethnicity
Where someone lives (Place, geography)
• Rates of disease and health outcomes significantly
worse among economically disadvantaged, particular
racial and ethnic minorities, and rural populations.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
24
25. DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
• Built Environment
• Child Care
• Crime and Safety
• Education
• Housing and Homelessness
• Hunger and Food Insecurity
• Income and Poverty*
• Labor and Employment*
• Parks and Recreation
• Transportation
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
25
26. DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH: INCOME, POVERTY
• Median household income: $51,944 (2009)
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
26
Percentage below the Poverty Level
by Age and Gender
% Below Poverty
Level
NC Orange County
Population for whom poverty status
is determined 17.5 20.1
Age
Under 18 years 24.9 22.2
18 to 64 years 16.2 20.8
65 years and over 9.9 11.3
Gender
Male 16.2 18.4
Female 18.7 21.6
27. DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH: POVERTY
Percentage below the Poverty Level
by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin
% Below Poverty Level
NC Orange County
One Race 17.3 NA
White 13.2 20.2
Black or African American 27.7 23.0
American Indian and Alaska Native 31.2 NA
Asian 14.1 14.1
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 26.8 NA
Some other race 36.7 NA
Two or other races 24.3
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
33.9 49.8
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 11.8 16.8
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
27
28. DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH: LABOR, EMPLOYMENT
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
28
Unemployment Rate (%)
by Gender, Poverty Status, and Disability Status
Unemployment Rate
(%)
NC Orange
County
Gender
Male 12.3 10.1
Female 11.4 9
With own children under 6 years 14.7 6.7
Poverty status in the past 12 months
Below poverty level 36.2 22
Disability status
With any disability 23.2 41.1
29. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
29
30. • Includes the availability
and affordability of health
care services and
insurance, ability to
navigate and understand
the health system, access
and transportation to
services, and information
about health care.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
30
31. • Includes human-made
structures such as
sidewalks, streets,
housing, businesses,
schools, parks, and, more
broadly, land use patterns.
The built environment
impacts safety and the
ability to get exercise, to
access good nutrition,
and health care services.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
31
32. • The leading cause of death
in Orange County in 2010
and has been ranked as #1
in 9 of the past 10 years. It is
estimated that nearly 80% of
cancers are due to factors
that can be prevented:
tobacco use, poor nutrition,
lack of physical activity, and
exposure to radiation. Many
cancers are highly treatable
with advanced screening.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
32
33. • Regular exercise and
proper nutrition
significantly contribute to
physical and mental
health; and can help
prevent chronic diseases
like diabetes, heart
disease, stroke and
cancer. Physical activity
and good nutrition are
important in maintaining a
healthy body weight.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
33
34. • Includes air quality;
drinking, and ground
water quality; and
lead hazards.
Environmental health
issues local to
neighborhoods may
exist in addition to
these key factors.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
34
35. • Addresses
unintentional injuries
like motor vehicle
crashes, falls,
poisonings, drowning,
etc., and intentional
injuries, or violence,
which includes sexual
assault, child abuse,
domestic violence,
homicide, and suicide.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
35
36. • Refers to a wide range of conditions
that affect one’s mood, thinking and
behavior. Broad classes of illness
include mood disorders (depression,
bipolar disorder), anxiety disorders,
psychotic disorders (schizophrenia),
eating disorders, personality
adaptations or disorders, and addictive
behaviors/substance abuse disorders.
Many factors contribute to its onset,
including genetics, biological factors,
life experiences, and brain chemistry,
though everyday stress.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
36
37. • Not only includes tooth and
gum health, but also has
overall health impacts (gum
disease contributes to heart
disease; tobacco use
contributes to tooth decay).
Issues in oral health include
availability of affordable
dental insurance, access to
regular and preventative
care, and population specific
issues.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
37
38. • Includes alcohol abuse and
illegal drug use, but also
includes underage drinking,
traffic accidents, prescription
drug abuse/misuse, and
injury related to alcohol and
drugs. It often connects with
mental health needs.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
38
39. • Transportation systems impact
quality of life and health. Expanding
active transportation (walking and
biking) options and safety can
prevent disease, reduce and
prevent motor-vehicle-related injury
and deaths, improve environmental
health, stimulate the economy and
improve equal access to resources.
Accessible and affordable
transportation is particularly an
issue in rural areas, for those with
disabilities, older citizens and lower-
income people.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
39
40. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
40
41. RANKED TOP 10 ORANGE COUNTY PRIORITIES
1. Access to Health Care, Insurance, and Information
2. Chronic Disease: Exercise, and Nutrition
3. Mental Health
4. Transportation
5. Built Environment
6. Cancer
7. Substance Abuse
8. Environmental Health
9. Oral Health
10.Injury
Write-ins: Teen Pregnancy/Youth Health, Sexual health,
Socio-economic Development
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
41
42. TOP 5 HEALTHY CAROLINIANS PRIORITIES
1. Access to Health Care, Insurance, and Information
2. Chronic Disease: Exercise and Nutrition
3. Mental Health
4. Substance Abuse
5. Injury
Current Healthy Carolinians of Orange County Focus
Areas
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
42
43. 2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
43
44. ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
• Orange County has highest per capita number of physicians and
dentists in NC
88.9 physicians, 10.4 dentists per 10,000 population
• 18.3% of Orange County residents do not have one or more
persons that they considered a doctor or health care provider
• Close to 28% of residents did not visit a doctor for a routine
(general physical exam) checkup within the past year
• 14.8% of county residents could not see a doctor due to cost
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
44
45. ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE
• In addition to medical insurance, factors contributing to
a resident’s inability to access health care services
include
Concentration of health care resources in the
southern part of county
Inadequate transportation systems in the central and
northern parts of Orange County
Language barriers; Recent relocation to the county
from another country
Perceived disparities (or racism) within health care
facilities
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
45
46. • Medical facilities
(hospitals, urgent care
facilities, and health
departments) in the
county are all within city
limits of Chapel Hill,
Carrboro, or
Hillsborough.
• This map does not
include private physician
or dentist offices.
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
46
ACCESS: ORANGE COUNTY MEDICAL FACILITIES
47. ACCESS TO HEALTH INSURANCE
• 2008-2009 county-level estimates of uninsured
18.9% (21,854) of Orange County residents, 0-64
years of age
• Due to economic recession, rise in unemployment
rates consistent with rise in uninsured residents
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
47
48. ACCESS TO HEALTH INFORMATION
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
48
• Health Literacy
“The degree to which individuals have the capacity to
obtain, process, and understand basic health information
and services needed to make appropriate health
decisions.”
Extends beyond a person’s reading and writing skills
Ability to comprehend spoken words
Use numeracy and math skills for calculations
Navigate the health care system
Transcends income and education levels
49. CHRONIC DISEASE: CANCER
• Cancer
Leading cause of death in Orange County (2010)
Ranked as leading cause of death in 9 of past 10 years
Among all cancers, death rate per 100,000 population was
163.3 (2008)
Lower cancer death rates than NC (2008)
Responsible for 859 deaths (2005-2009)
Total number of cancer deaths decreased slightly in
comparison with previous time periods
Difference in cancer deaths between racial groups is dramatic
For all common cancers, African Americans had higher death
rate than whites
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
49
50. CHRONIC DISEASE: DIABETES
• Diabetes
2001-2005, age-adjusted diabetes death rates for Orange
County was 17.8 per 100,000 (NC rate was 27.6 per 100,000)
Percentage county residents with diabetes varied in recent
years
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
50
Disparities in Diabetes Orange County NC Residents
% with
Diabetes
% without
Diabetes
% Borderline
Diabetes
2005 2010 2005 2010 2005 2010
Gender Male 4.1 4.2 94.5 95.4 1.4 0.4
Female 7.1 6.1 90.0 91.7 1.6 1.1
Race White 3.8 3.5 95.0 95.2 0.8 1.0
Other 11.6 10.5 82.8 87.9 3.9 0.0
Age 18-44 1.5 2.3 96.4 96.9 0.9 0.0
45+ 10.8 8.1 87.0 90.0 2.2 1.6
Educatio
n
High school or
less
6.5 8.0 90.4 91.3 1.7 0.7
Some college 5.3 4.5 92.9 94.0 1.4 0.8
51. CHRONIC DISEASE: HEART DISEASE AND STROKE
• Heart Disease and Stroke
Second leading cause of death
137 deaths due to heart disease; 29 due to cerebrovascular
disease (2009)
Heart disease and cerebrovascular disease leading causes of
hospitalizations, hospital expenses
Heart disease: $31,730,269
Cerebrovascular disease: $7,290,187
Age-adjusted death rate for heart disease decreasing
2001-2005: 165.3 per 100,000
2009: 148.4 per 100,000
Age-adjusted death rate for cerebrovascular disease is 39.0
per 100,000 (2009)
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
51
52. CHRONIC DISEASE: OBESITY, OVERWEIGHT
• Obesity and Overweight
Contributes to the burden of cancer, heart disease,
stroke
Rate of overweight or obese among residents 18 and
older
Overall rate dropped from 56% to 48.1% (2007-2009)
However, recent increase to 53.2% (2010)
Rate of overweight among 2-4 year olds has decreased
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
52
53. CHRONIC DISEASE: EXERCISE AND NUTRITION
• Physical activity and proper nutrition
Important to reach a healthy body weight
Meeting recommendations can help prevent cardio-
metabolic conditions
Healthy eating in childhood and adolescence important
for proper growth and development
• 31.1% of residents consume five or more servings of fruits
or vegetables per day (2009)
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
53
54. MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
• Suicide
Among top 10 leading causes of death
Rates fluctuated (2000-2009), ranging from a low of
5.8/100,000 to a high of 18.5/100,000
• High stress/Poor mental health
• Substance abuse
Increasing prevalence of prescription drug abuse/misuse
Underage drinking
Driving under the influence
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
54
55. MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
• Contributing factors
System instability
Family and community violence
Barriers to access
Stigma
Lack of knowledge about existing services
Lack of adequate insurance or co-pays
Lack of specific service/needing more options
55
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
56. TOBACCO
• Tobacco use remains leading preventable cause of death
• 11.5% of county residents report smoking some days or every day,
compared to 20.3% in NC (2009)
• 14.5% of high school students report using tobacco (cigarettes,
cigars, smokeless tobacco) in the past 30 days (2011)
• 8.1% of people exposed to secondhand smoke in workplace
(2008)
• Educational attainment, employment correlated with secondhand
smoke exposure
• Percentage of mothers who smoked during pregnancy has been
decreasing since 1994
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
56
57. INJURY AND VIOLENCE
• Broad topic: Injury-related health issues including
Unintentional injuries: Motor vehicle crashes, falls,
poisonings, drowning, etc.
Intentional injuries/violence: Sexual assault, child abuse,
domestic violence, suicide, human trafficking, etc.
• Unintentional injuries a leading cause of death for ages 1-44
• Intentional injuries (or violence) likewise pervasive and a
leading cause of death/hospitalization, especially for ages
15-35
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
57
58. TAKING ACTION, TOGETHER
• Many efforts underway to address priority areas; new
initiatives needed to respond to identified gaps
• Progress requires total community involvement to
improve the quality of life for people living in Orange
County
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
58
59. TAKING ACTION, TOGETHER
• Join the more than 125 other individuals and 80
county agencies and organizations who are partnering
with Healthy Carolinians of Orange County to find
creative solutions so that all Orange County residents
can choose health as their first priority
• To find out how to become involved with work groups
addressing the top health concerns in the county,
please contact the Healthy Carolinians Coordinator
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
59
60. CONTACT INFORMATION
Nidhi Sachdeva MPH, CHES
• Healthy Carolinians Coordinator
• Orange County Health Department
• 300 West Tryon Street | Hillsborough, NC 27278
• Phone: 919.245.2440
• Email: nsachdeva@co.orange.nc.us
• Website, Full Report, Membership Information:
http://www.co.orange.nc.us/healthycarolinians
2 0 1 1 C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H A S S E S S M E N T
H E A L T H Y C A R O L I N I A N S O F O R A N G E C O U N T Y
60
Editor's Notes
The Orange County Health Department, and the Healthy Carolinians of Orange County (HCOC) Partnership with its 125 individual members from 80 partner agencies and community representatives, worked collaboratively to complete the community health assessment.
Information gathered from nearly 230 community members (through surveys and focus groups), data from local agencies, and county and state statistics were used to assess the health of the Orange County community.
The 2011 Community Health Assessment (CHA) is intended to enable local public health officials and community groups to monitor trends in health status, identify priorities among health issues, and determine the availability of resources within Orange County to adequately address these priorities.
The document seeks to be useful, relevant, actionable, and both reflective and forward-looking; and to provide information for effective strategic community health planning.
Phases of the Community Health Assessment
Community-based assessment is the first step in the community health planning process. As encouraged in the North Carolina Community Health Assessment Process, county residents take the lead role in forming partnerships, gathering health-related data, determining priority health issues, identifying resources, and planning community health programs.
The CHA report is based on both primary and secondary data sources; and the participation of hundreds of individuals in various roles from November 2010 to December 2011.
Secondary data was gathered from a wide range of sources that are cited throughout the full document.
In the CHA framework (previous slide), the assessment process starts with the people who live in the community and continues their involvement through the implementation of strategies developed for addressing these problems. This way, community health assessment is done by the community rather than on the community.
To ensure that the true needs of the community were identified and addressed, the assessment process involved the community at every phase, including planning, data collection, evaluation, identification of health issues and community strengths, and the development of strategies to address identified problems.
A Community Health Opinion Survey was used to collect primary quantitative data.
Since one of the main goals of the Healthy Carolinians of Orange County task force is to address health disparities and to identify needs of populations who are most disadvantaged, survey households were sampled from census blocks with the highest poverty percentage.
Out of 700 households attempted, 160 individuals completed the 110-question survey.
The survey, carried out by a team of 90 volunteers and administered in multiple languages, covered various health topics, including quality of life in Orange County, community improvement, health information, personal health, family health, access to care, environmental health, emergency preparedness, and demographics.
In addition, nine focus groups were conducted with 69 individuals, to give traditionally hard-to-reach populations an opportunity to share, and to gain a more well-rounded understanding of residents’ health concerns in Orange County.
Questions included in the focus group guide were intentionally broad, and explored definitions of health, community strengths, barriers to accessing care and information.
Focus groups conducted as part of the Assessment were:
Latino Immigrants
Mental health consumers
Older Adults (2)
People from Burma
Substance abusers
Youth – High school (3)
After this, five open community forums were held at different locations in Orange County, and nearly 200 individuals participated. Attendees were presented with the main findings from the survey and focus groups.
The full report, Executive Summary document, and this PowerPoint presentation can be found online at www.orangecountync.gov/healthycarolinians.
Orange County Community Profile Data
Age Breakdown
Under 5 years (Children)
Under 18 years (Minors, School-age)
Under 25 years (Youth)
Between 25-65 years (adults)
65 years or older (Seniors/older adults)
Population diversifying in terms of the new residents’ countries of origin
Largest group of minorities differ in the three main municipalities
Hillsborough: Black residents make up largest group of minorities
Carrboro: Hispanic or Latino residents
Chapel Hill: Asian residents
Orange County continues to not only grow, but diversify in its growth. As per the 2010 U. S. Census, 74.4% of the Orange County population was white, 11.9% was Black, 8.2% was Hispanic or Latino of any race, and 6.7% was Asian. Though the percentage of Black residents is twice as much in NC than in Orange County, the diversity mix of other races across Orange County was roughly comparable with the percentages in North Carolina state, which had a 68.5% white, 21.5% Black, and 8.4% Hispanic or Latino population in 2010.
The pattern of racial and ethnic diversity differs somewhat across cities and towns in the county. The town of Hillsborough has the largest proportion (37.1%) of non-white residents, including 29.5% Black residents and 6.6% of Hispanic or Latino of any race. Orange County’s Hispanic/Latino ethnic population has almost doubled from 4.5% in 2000 to 8.2% in 2010, with the highest concentration of Latinos in the city of Carrboro, comprising 13.8% of the city’s population. While Orange County’s Latino population mirrored the percentage of Latinos across the state, the county’s Asian population was considerably higher, 6.7% compared with 2.2% in the state. The highest concentration of Asians was in Chapel Hill, where in 2010 they comprised 11.9% of the population, up from only 4.1% in 2000.
The leading causes of death in Orange County are very similar to the leading causes in the state of North Carolina.
During the five-year period 2005-2009, almost 46% of the 3,595 deaths in Orange County were due to two primary causes—cancer and diseases of the heart. For Orange County (2005-2009), the top five leading causes of death were cancer (24.6%), diseases of the heart (21.2%), cerebrovascular diseases (5.5%), chronic lower respiratory diseases (4.4%), and unintentional injuries (2.9%). For each of these and other causes of death, the percentages and overall pattern were roughly the same in Orange County and in NC, though in OC, the rates of death due to cancer and influenza were higher than for those for the state.
The age-adjusted death rates for Orange County are consistently below the rates for NC, for all of the top-10 causes of death except for suicide where it is slightly higher.
For example, for the top-2 leading causes, the rates for cancer deaths are 158.4 and 185.6 respectively in Orange County and NC, and for diseases of the heart the rates are respectively 141.8 and 191.7.
With the exception of suicide, this shows that Orange County is doing better on these health indicators than North Carolina.
Because of a small number of cases or base population, it is often misleading to look at numbers for one year; it is instead helpful to look at trends over time.
The leading causes of death have been relatively stable for the period 2005-2009, both for Orange County and North Carolina. Cancer and heart disease have consistently been the top two causes, for each of these five years. The percentage of cancer deaths in Orange County has ranged between 22.5% and 25.8%, but has been fairly stable (at about 23%) in North Carolina. The percentage of deaths from heart disease went up in Orange County from 17.8% in 2005 to 23.4% in 2007, but has dropped in subsequent years to 20.4% in 2009. In contrast, the percentage of deaths in North Carolina due to heart disease has been relatively stable, at about 23% during the period 2007-2009.
The leading causes of hospitalization in Orange County and North Carolina are important, both as indicators of health status and drivers of health cost. These causes are different from the leading causes of death (discussed above), and reflect the nature and pattern of the disease burden in the county and state, respectively.
In general, the ten leading causes of hospitalization are similar in Orange County and in North Carolina. In both the county and state, cardio-vascular and circulatory diseases, pregnancy and childbirth, digestive system diseases, injuries and poisoning, and other diagnoses (including mental health) rank among the five leading causes of hospitalization.
Response to disparities. The Healthy Carolinians of Orange County (HCOC) task force and the Health Department strive to reduce health disparities by helping to build a community where all residents have an equal opportunity to lead long, healthy, and productive lives.
It is recognized that for residents to be healthy, they need clean air and water, nutritious food, a safe physical environment, access to parks and sidewalks, violence- and drug-free neighborhoods, good jobs and schools, safe housing, and transportation, etc.
Healthy Carolinians recognizes that low income, rural and minority communities also need to be empowered to speak to their needs and to be instrumental in developing strategies that ensure the health and well-being of their families.
To this end, community representatives from the HCOC Executive Committee helped plan and implement community forums as part of the Community Health Assessment.
It is the aim of HCOC to strengthen partnerships with community and neighborhood associations as it moves into action planning and implementation of the next four-year plan. In addition, HCOC is committed to a greater focus on larger societal structures and policies as an important mechanism for addressing the social determinants of health.
In Orange County, as in other parts of NC and the United States, health status depends largely on where one lives and the individual’s racial, ethnic, and economic status.
Rates and outcomes of disease are significantly worse among economically disadvantaged and rural populations and among particular racial and ethnic minorities. While health disparities have long been recognized, they have been poorly understood.
Income. The relationship between health and income has come to be known as the health-wealth gradient in order to emphasize the strong relationship of the two throughout the income distribution. With each increasing gradient of wealth there is a documented increase in health and life expectancy. Access to health insurance does not completely explain this relationship. Other factors like material deprivation, chronic stress, and reduced control over one’s life experiences are theorized as other important explanations for the health-wealth gradient. The health-wealth gradient suggests the need for a policy shift from focus on the individuals’ habits and diseases to focus on social and economic issues that lead to illness.
Race. In Orange County, as elsewhere in the state and nation, significant racial differences in morbidity and mortality continue to be documented.
Ethnicity. Nationally, immigrants to the US present an exception to the finding of poorer health and earlier mortality among persons with lower income, education, and minority racial status.
Place or residence. Neighborhood conditions have an indirect effect on health by impacting the ease with which residents can make healthy choices related to diet, exercise, and safety. Where people live also may determine their proximity to environmental hazards, access to clean water and sewer, the quality of schools, the availability of affordable housing and the opportunity for positive social interactions with neighbors.
The social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age.
Determinants of health heavily influence opportunities for healthy living.
*Income/Poverty and *Labor/Employment discussed in subsequent slides
Orange County is a relatively affluent county in the state, with a median household income of $51,944 in 2009, which was higher than the median of $43,754 for North Carolina. For comparison, the Orange County median household income was also higher than that of neighboring Alamance and Durham counties, which were $43,103 and $48,770 respectively.
In comparison, of the estimated Orange County population of 124,207 for which poverty data was available, as many as 24,931 were estimated to be below the poverty level, i.e., over a fifth (20.1%) of the county’s population was living on income below the federal poverty level. However, one must keep in mind that a significant portion of Orange County’s population are University students who are not employed or earning an income and are included in the Census.
The age and gender distributions of the North Carolina and Orange County populations living below the poverty level, as per the 2010 Census data, are given in Table.
In all categories except individuals under 18 years of age, the percent of the population living below the poverty level in 2010 was higher in Orange County than in North Carolina.
Gender disparities also exist, with the poverty rate for females higher than the rate for males in 2010.
Two major sources of disparity in poverty levels are race and ethnic origin.
In Orange County, as in North Carolina, those who are Black or African American are more likely to be poor than those who are white; but those who are Asian have a lower poverty rate (possibly due to differences in levels of education or their employment status).
In Orange County, persons of Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race) are three times more likely to be poor than those who are white non-Hispanic or non-Latino. Also, for most categories for which data is available from the 2010 US Census, the poverty rate is about the same or higher in Orange County than in North Carolina.
According to the latest 2010 U. S. Census data, the unemployment rate in Orange County is lower than the rate in North Carolina, but is still unacceptably high.
Overall, the unemployment rate in Orange County is 10.1% for males, and 9% for females; and is even higher (22%) for those below the poverty level and those with any disability (respectively, 22% and 41.1%).
CHA findings were organized into ten areas, identified by looking at the intersection of Healthy NC 2020 Objectives, top Orange County community survey issues, top focus group themes, and top ten leading causes of death in Orange County.
The Top Ten Health Issues in Orange County that were identified and presented are listed alphabetically with definitions in the next slides.
Definition: Access
Definition: Built environment
Definition: Cancer
Definition: Chronic disease
Definition: Environmental health
Definition: Injury
Definition: Mental health
Definition: Oral health
Definition: Substance abuse
Definition: Transportation
Based on total votes from the five community forums, Orange County’s Top 10 Issues, ranked on “Importance” (1 being most important) are listed here.
Here are the five areas that were determined to be of greatest concern to the Orange County community after the Healthy Carolinians of Orange County Annual Meeting where attendees voted on “Importance and Changeability.”
The concerns listed here were selected by the community and are listed in the order of the numbers votes they received, ranked greatest to least (1 is the highest priority).
These five topics will be the focus of Healthy Carolinians Action Plans and Task Groups for the next 4 years (2012-2015).
Orange County has the highest per capita number of physicians and dentists in the state with 88.9 physicians and 10.4 dentists per 10,000 population. Research indicates that communities with a higher primary care provider to population ratio have better health outcomes, including lower infant mortality rate and higher life expectancy. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Healthcare Research. (2008). North Carolina 2009 Health Professions Data Book. Accessed from http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/hp/index.html. North Carolina Institute of Medicine. (2010). Prevention for the Health of North Carolina: Prevention Action Plan. Accessed from http://www.nciom.org/publications/.
Orange County’s 2009 BRFSS data also reveals that 18.3% of Orange County residents do not have one or more persons that they considered a doctor or health care provider. Close to 28% of residents did not visit a doctor for a routine (general physical exam) checkup within the past year. In addition, 14.8% of county residents could not see a medical doctor due to cost.
In addition to medical insurance, factors contributing to a resident’s inability to access health care services include the concentration of health care resources in the southern part of the county, inadequate transportation systems in the central and northern part of the county; language barriers, recent relocation to the county from another country, and perceived disparities (or racism) within health care facilities.
According to 2008-2009 county-level estimates of uninsured residents, 18.9% (21,854) of Orange County residents between 0-64 years of age were uninsured. North Carolina Institute of Medicine. (2010). North Carolina County-Level Estimates of Non-Elderly Uninsured. Accessed from
The state’s rise in unemployment rates is consistent with a rise in uninsured residents. In Orange County, estimates of non-elderly (0-64 years) uninsured rose from 16.8 percent in 2006-2007 to 18.9 percent in 2008-2009. North Carolina Institute of Medicine and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, (2007). UNC Chapel Hill North Carolina County-Level Estimates of Non-Elderly Uninsured 2006-2007. Accessed from http://www.nciom.org/nc-health-data/uninsured-snapshots/.
The tables below show 2020 Insurance Coverage Estimates for Orange County by zip code with the proposed law changes. Based on these projections, there could still be over 10,000 uninsured Orange County citizens in 2020. This would reduce the uninsured group by over 50 percent based on the 21,000 uninsured Orange county citizens in 2009.
Health literacy is defined as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
According to Holmes et al., health literacy extends beyond a person’s reading and writing skills to also include the ability to comprehend spoken words; use numeracy and math skills for calculations; and navigate the health care system. Holmes, M., Bacon, T.J., Dobson, L.A., McGorty E. K., and Silberman, P. (2007). Addressing Health Literacy Through Improved Patient-Practitioner Communication. NC Med J., (68)5.
Health literacy transcends income and education levels. A person with a college degree could still have difficulty with comprehending and following health instructions. In addition, a person who works within the health care field can still have limited reading and comprehension levels and difficulty with understanding medical and health information given to them.
Cancer continued to be the leading cause of death in Orange County in 2010. It has been ranked as the leading cause of death in 9 of the past 10 years, responsible for 859 deaths between the years 2005-2009, including from lung/bronchus cancer (245 deaths), female breast (69 deaths), colon/rectal (65 deaths), and prostate cancer (49 deaths).
In 2008, colorectal cancer was the third leading cause of cancer deaths in Orange County. The county’s colorectal cancer mortality rate (per 100,000 population) was 12.7, higher than the Healthy NC 2020 target of 10.1. African Americans in the county had the greatest burden of this disease, with a rate of 30.1 per 100,000 population, compared with 10.6 for Caucasians. Despite these numbers, colorectal cancer is treatable if detected early through screening.
Orange County had lower cancer death rates in 2008 than the North Carolina state, across various cancer sites. Among all cancers, the death rate in Orange County (per 100,000 population) was 163.3, compared with the state death rate of 184.8 (see Figure below). While Chatham County, which serves as a peer county to Orange County, had higher death rates for both prostate and female breast cancer, both counties had similar rates for lung/bronchus and all cancers combined. State Center for Health Statistics, CATCH-NC Portal. Colon, Rectal or Anus Cancer Deaths per 100,000 Population. http://www.ncpublichealthcatch.com/ReportPortal/design/view.aspx Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. The power of prevention: chronic disease...the public health challenge of the 21st century. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/pdf/2009-Power-of-Prevention.pdf
However, when looking within the county, the difference in cancer deaths between racial groups was dramatic. Across every cancer site (i.e., for all common cancers), in 2008 African Americans in Orange County had a higher death rate than whites. For colorectal cancer mortality rate in 2008, for example, whites experienced a mortality rate of 10.6 per 100,000 population, compared with a mortality rate of 30.1 (i.e., about three times higher) for African Americans. State Center for Health Statistics, CATCH-NC Portal. Chronic Disease: Cancer. http://www.ncpublichealthcatch.com/ReportPortal/design/view.aspx
Overall, North Carolina has managed to reduce all-cause mortality from diabetes during the period 2004-2009, with diabetes ranked as number five in 2003 and number seven in 2009. Diabetes Mellitus accounted for about 2,107 deaths in North Carolina in 2009, compared with 2,255 in 2005. From 2001-2005, age-adjusted diabetes death rates for North Carolina were about 27.6 per 100,000.
During that same period, Orange County had a rate of 17.8 per 100,000.
The 2005-2009 data show the age-adjusted death rate for Diabetes Mellitus at 24 per 100,000 in North Carolina and 15.3 per 100,000, in Orange County. Over the past few years, the rate of decrease for the state of North Carolina has been greater than for Orange County. There are many possible reasons for this, including new state-wide programs and more public awareness; or lower baseline rates of disease in Orange County than in NC, which result in a slower rate of change. SCHS. North Carolina Vital Statistics, Leading Causes of Death. Retrieved on June 25, 2011 from http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/deaths/lcd/
Percentage county residents who have ever been told that they had diabetes has varied slightly in recent years, ranging from 5.6% in 2005, to 5.8% in 2007, 5.1% in 2009, and 5.2% in 2010
In 2010, the diabetes rate for those with a high school education or less was almost double the rate for those who have had some college (8% vs 4.5%); while the rate for non-whites is almost three-times the rate for white residents diagnosed with diabetes (10.5% vs. 3.5%). Females, those older than 45, and those with incomes below $50,000 per year, are all more likely to be told that they have diabetes than was the case in 2009, but this is a trend that has not remained consistent over the years. In 2007, residents with incomes above $50,000 per year had similar rates of diagnosed diabetes as those with lower incomes; and in 2008, males were marginally more likely than females to have been diagnosed with diabetes.
In 2009 there were 137 deaths due to heart disease and 29 due to cerebrovascular disease in Orange County NC SCHS Mortality Statistics Summary for 2009 North Carolina Residents. Retrieved from: http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/deaths /lcd/2009/heartdisease.html
Between the years 2001 and 2005 the age-adjusted death rate for heart disease in Orange County was 165.3 per 100,000; and in 2009, it was 148.4 per 100,000. NC DHHS State Center for Health Statistics, 2001-2005 age-adjusted death rates per 100,000 population for Orange County. NC SCHS Mortality Statistics Summary for 2009 North Carolina Residents. Retrieved from: http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/deaths /lcd/2009/heartdisease.html
Contributes to the burden of cancer, heart disease, stroke
Overweight children 70% more likely to become overweight adults and suffer from chronic disease and other health related consequences at an earlier age
For young children, based on NC NPASS data gathered from those receiving Health Department and WIC services, it appears that the rate of overweight and obesity among Orange County 2-4 year olds has decreased. However, it should be noted that the total number of children included in the data set for 2009 was only 681, versus 996 children in 2008 when the rate was 28.2%, and 1,324 children in 2007 when the rate was 34.1%.
Among high school students surveyed in the 2009 YRBS in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, 20.6% of middle school students believed themselves to be slightly overweight and 30% of these were trying to lose weight; while 23% of high schoolers describe themselves as overweight and 41.5% were trying to lose weight. 2009 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
Meeting these recommendations for physical activity (PA) can help prevent cardio-metabolic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, respiratory ailments, high blood pressure, stroke, atherosclerosis, and osteoporosis. Physical activities, along with nutrition, is a key intervention for individuals to reach a healthy body weight, for unlike genetics, metabolism, environment, culture, and socioeconomic factors, physical activity is a relatively modifiable health risk behavior. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Power of Prevention: Chronic Diseas\e...The Public Health Challenge of the 21st Century. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/pdf/2009-Power-ofPrevention.pdf
Healthy eating is associated with reduced risk for many diseases, including the three leading causes of death: heart disease, cancer, and stroke. Healthy eating in childhood and adolescence is important for proper growth and development, and can prevent health problems such as obesity, dental caries, and iron deficiency anemia.
According to Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) data, the percentage of Orange County residents who consume five or more servings of fruits or vegetables per day decreased from 32.3% in 2005 to 23.5% in 2007, but then increased to 31.1% in 2009. Orange County has continued to surpass the state of North Carolina, which only had an average of 20.6% in 2009. For the period 2005-2009, females, whites, persons older than 44 years who have some college education, and persons with incomes greater than $49,000 per year consistently consume more fruits and vegetables than other groups. NC SCHS. BRFSS 2009 Survey Results for Orange County. % of Adults Who Reported Eating Five or More Servings of Fruits or Veg/Day. Accessed on June 13, 2011 at: http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/brfss/2009/oran/_frtindx.html
In North Carolina, the rate of suicides has remained relatively constant over the period of 2000-2009 with a rate ranging from a low of 11.6/100,000 to a high of 13.2/100,000. The suicide rate in Orange County, however, has seemed to fluctuate without any set trend between this same time period, ranging from a low of 5.8/100,000 (population: 117,883) to a high of 18.5/100,000 (population: 116,049). North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. NC Vital Statistics Volume 2, Leading Causes of Death (2001-2009). Retrieved from http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/deaths/lcd/2009/.
One way of measuring poor mental health days is to look at presence of stress and lack of emotional support. In Orange County, emotional support has been captured through a BRFSS survey question between the years 2005-2009. The question asked was, “How often do you get the social and emotional support you need?” While the responses varied, nearly two-thirds of the respondents stated that they had either “Always” or “Usually” received the social and emotional support they needed. However, there has been a decrease in those that have answered “Always” from a high of 53.9 in 2006 to a 5-year low 44.3% in 2009. North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. BRFSS Topics for Orange County 2005-2009. Retrieved from http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/brfss/2009/oran/topics.html
Only 11.5% of county residents report smoking some days or every day in 2009, compared to 20.3% statewide. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). (2009). Available at: http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/brfss/2009/oran/_smoker3.html
Only 14.5% of high school students report using tobacco (cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco) in the past 30 days. Youth Risk Behavior Survey. (2011). Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
The percentage of people exposed to secondhand smoke in the workplace was 14.6% for North Carolina. This percentage included both those exposed 1-6 days and those exposed all 7 days. In Orange County, 8.1% of people were exposed to secondhand smoke in the workplace. The largest difference between the state of North Carolina and Orange County was seen in people exposed all 7 days: 7.8% (NC) vs. 1.3% (Orange County).
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). (2008). Available at: http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/brfss/2008/oran/SHSINWRK.html
Both in Orange County and North Carolina overall, the percentage of mothers who smoked during pregnancy has been decreasing since 1994. In Orange County there was a 68% decrease in smoking during pregnancy between the five-year periods 1994-1998 and 2004-2008. In North Carolina overall, the decrease between the same two periods was 73%. NC SCHS. North Carolina 2009 CATCH data. Retrieved from http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/catch/
Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of death for all North Carolinians from the ages of 1-44, and the fifth leading cause of death overall. They also remain a leading cause of death in Orange County.
Intentional injuries (or violence) are likewise pervasive and are a leading cause of death and hospitalization, especially for youth aged 15-35.