• Research ethicsare defined as a system /set of
moral principles, or rules of behaviour that is
acceptable to research (Goodwin & Goodwin,
2017).
• They are important for a number of reasons,
these include moral obligation to society,
maintaining a good image of the discipline and
profession.
3.
APA code ofethics
• The code directs psychological scientists in the
planning, execution, and reporting of their
research, and it includes guidelines for
psychological research that tests both human
participants and animals (Goodwin &
Goodwin,2017).
4.
APA code ofethics
• The code includes a set of five general principles
and 89 standards, clustered into 10 general
categories.
• The five basic principles are:
1. Principle A Beneficence and non-maleficience
2. Principle B Fidelity and responsibility
3. Principle C Integrity
4. Principle D Justice
5. Principle E Respect for people’s rights and dignity
5.
• The generalprinciples are part of the
aspirational goals that guide psychologists
towards the highest ideals of psychology.
• They do not represent ideals.
6.
Beneficence and non-maleficence
•Psychologists strive to benefit those they work
with and take care to do no harm.
• Researchers must constantly weigh the benefits
and costs of the research they conduct and
seek to achieve the greatest good in their
research (Goodwin & Goodwin, 2017).
• The non maleficence principle expects
researchers to minimise the risks of harm or
discomfort to the participants.
7.
Fidelity and Responsibility
•Psychologists establish relationships of trust
with those they work with (Goodwin, 2010).
• Researchers should uphold professional
standards of conduct, clarify their professional
roles and obligations, accept appropriate
responsibility for their own behaviour, and seek
to manage conflicts of interest that could lead
to exploitation or harm.
•
8.
• Researchers areobligated to be constantly
aware of their responsibility to society and are
reminded to always exemplify the highest
standards of professional behaviour in their
role as researchers.
9.
Integrity
• Psychologists seekto promote accuracy,
honesty, and truthfulness in the science,
teaching and practice of psychology.
• Researchers are compelled to be scrupulously
honest in all aspects of the research
enterprise.
10.
Justice
• It isrecognised that fairness and justice
entitles all persons access to and benefits from
the contribution of psychology.
• Reasonable judgement and precaution should
be taken to insure that the researchers’
potential biases, the boundaries of their
competence and the limitations of their
expertise do not lead to or do not condone
unjust practices.
11.
• Researchers areobligated to treat everyone
involved in the research with fairness and to
maintain a level of expertise that reduces the
chances of their work showing any form of
bias.
12.
Respect for people’srights and dignity
• Psychologists respect the dignity and worth of
all people, and the rights of individuals to
privacy, confidentiality and self determination
(Goodwin & Goodwin, 2017).
• Researchers should be aware that special
safeguards may be necessary to protect the
rights and welfare of persons or communities
whose vulnerabilities impair autonomous
decision making.
13.
• Psychologists areaware of and respect
cultural, individual, and role differences.
• Researchers need to be vigorous in their
efforts to safeguard the welfare and protect
the rights of those volunteering as research
participants.
14.
Ethical standards forresearch with humans
• Ethical standards are enforceable rules for
conduct.
• The standards include making a judgment that
the research benefits outweigh the costs,
gaining informed consent and treating
research participants well during the course of
the study and after it has been completed.
15.
Informed Consent
• Potentialparticipants should be given enough
information about the study’s purpose and the
research procedure.
• To be informed, consent must be given by
people who are competent to have consent,
have consented voluntarily, are fully informed
about the research and have comprehended
what they have been told (Reynolds, 1979).
16.
• Informed consentinvolves giving people the
chance to decide whether they want to take
part in the study before the actual start of the
research.
• People should not be forced, into participating
in a study.
• Informed consent also involves informing
individuals of their right to terminate their
participation at any time for any reason.
Informed Consent andspecial populations
• Not all research participants are capable of giving
their consent due to factors such as age and disability.
• In these cases informed consent should be given by
either parents or legal guardians.
• Children might not be able to fully understand a
consent form , therefore their parents are the ones
who give consent.
• Researchers inform the child about the study and
they gain assent from the child.
19.
• Legal guardiansprovide informed consent for people
confined in institutions.
• A researcher is very often in a position of authority over
participants and this authority must never be used to
pressurize participants to take part in a study.
• It is imperative to ensure that participants do not feel
coerced into volunteering to take part in a study.
• This a very difficult problem to avoid in environments
such as prisons.
20.
Subjects right towithdraw from the study
• A researcher must make it clear to the
participants at the onset of the research that
they have the right to withdraw from the
study at any time, the right to withdraw
consent and the right to require that any data
on them be destroyed.
21.
Treating Participants Well
•After the research study is over, the
researcher debriefs the participants.
• Debriefing is when the researcher recaps the
purpose of the study and answers questions
that the participants might have.
22.
• The researcherexplains why it was necessary
to utilise deception and ensures that
participants leave the study without any
negative attitudes towards the discipline.
• Debriefing serves two related processes
dehoaxing and desensitising.
• Dehoaxing means revealing the purpose of the
study and the hypothesis being tested.
23.
• Desensitisation refersto the process of
reducing any stress or any other negative
feelings that might have been experienced
during the research.
24.
• The researcheralso discusses with the
participants their experience of the research
process from a scientific point of view.
• There might be some unanticipated variables
which the researcher was not aware of e.g
particpants might be responding to a
particular variable that the researcher had not
intended to measure or was not aware of.
25.
Deception
• Occurs whenresearchers withhold the true
purpose of the research from the participants
or deliberately mislead participants as to the
true nature of the research.
• In some instances, research participants
attempt to guess what the researcher is trying
to find and modify their behaviour
accordingly.
26.
• According toAPA, it is permissible to use
deception when the research is important,
when there are no alternatives and there is no
foreseeable harm to participants.
27.
Confidentiality and Privacy
•Treating participants well also concerns
confidentiality and privacy.
• Participants should be confident that their
identities will not be known by anyone other
than the researcher and that only group or
disguised data will be reported.
• Confidentiality though of importance, does not
override the duty to protect the welfare of
participants.
28.
• Exceptions occurin cases when researchers
might be compelled by law to report certain
things disclosed by participants.
• In research that might involve such disclosure,
the informed consent form must make it clear
that confidentiality could be limited (Folkman,
2000).
29.
Avoiding Harm toparticipants
• The most basic ethical concern is avoiding
causing harm to participants, either
psychologically or physically.
• Psychologists must protect the welfare of
participants in their research.
• According to Polit and Hungler (1999; 31) “Do
good, above all do no harm.”
30.
• The minimisationof emotional harm
experienced by participants is an important
ethical concern particularly in personality
research.
• In practice the risk of harm to the participant
in a psychological study should never be
greater than the risk which the person would
encounter during the course of their normal
lifestyle.
31.
• Where risksdo exist the researcher must
obtain the unbiased approval of independent
advisers before the research takes place.
• The participants must be fully informed of the
possible risks to themselves and each
individual must individually give informed
consent.