SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Anselm’s Ontological
Argument
L/O – I will be able to explain Anselm’s two
ontological arguments, and start to assess
Gaunilo’s response.
‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’
Psalm 14:1
Copy this statement down. What do you think it is trying to suggest and
why?
A predicate is…
‘an intrinsic property or quality of something’
Predicates of an elephant might be…
A trunk, size, long ears, being a mammal,
tusks, long memory, etc…
Predicates of…?


The Earth



A Car



A Human


Anselm’s essential claim is…

Existence is a predicate of God (it is a
property or quality of God’s nature).
Anselm’s First Argument
1)
2)
3)

God is the greatest possible being which can be
conceived (thought) of.
God may exist either in the mind alone, or in reality
as well.
Something which exists in reality and in the mind
is greater than something which exists just as an
idea in the mind alone.

Conclusion:
4) God must exist in reality and in the mind (or we have
not thought of the greatest possible being).
Features of the first argument
(for an essay plan).
1)

2)
3)
4)
5)

‘a being which nothing greater can be conceived’:
Anselm expects everyone will accept this
definition.
Painter and painting analogy (mind and reality).
Reductio ad absurdum – if he does exist in the
mind alone then he is not greatest possible being.
God’s existence is analytic (once we analyse the
definition of the term we will see that God exists).
Anyone who doesn’t accept it is a ‘fool’, as it is
plain and obvious.
Anselm’s second argument
1)
2)

God is that being nothing greater than
which can be thought of.
Something which cannot be thought not to
exist is greater than anything which can be
thought not to exist.

Conclusion:
3) Therefore, it is impossible to think that this
being (God) cannot exist.
Argument 2: In simpler
language…
You can’t think of anything greater
than God.
2) Necessary things are greater than
contingent things.
Conclusion
1)

3) God is necessary
Features of Anselm’s
second argument
1) This adds the idea that it is impossible
for God not to exist – in other words,
God is necessary.
2) It has been argued that his second
argument was aimed at believers as a
proof that existence in God is rational
– to justify a belief in God.
Gaunilo’s response


Gaunilo was a contemporary of Anselm, he was a
monk who rejected Anselm’s argument in ‘On
Behalf of the fool’ using three arguments….

1)

On Gossip – the fool could have all kinds of made
up things in his head, gossip for instance is
unreliable – how should he be able to discern what
is true and what is not?
You can’t define things into existence
The Perfect Island

2)
3)
The Perfect Island


Think of some other examples you
could include to demonstrate the point
about the Perfect Island in an essay…


Plantinga – Islands are different to
God – there could always be a more
perfect Island - more dancing girls,
more lush palm trees, twice the size,
etc. – idea of a greatest possible
island is incoherent. God on the other
hand is maximally great – nothing
greater is possible.
Homework
Use the info in this Powerpoint and the
last (they’re on moodle) to write an
essay plan for ‘Explain Anselm’s
ontological arguments…’ (25 marks).
 Pick three main points and write out
three paragraphs.
For next lesson


More Related Content

What's hot

Apologetics 1 Introduction
Apologetics 1 IntroductionApologetics 1 Introduction
Apologetics 1 Introduction
Third Column Ministries
 
Christian Apologetics Session 1
Christian Apologetics Session 1Christian Apologetics Session 1
Christian Apologetics Session 1
Richard Chamberlain
 
Who is god
Who is godWho is god
Who is god
Colin Cidence
 
Rationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and EmpiricismRationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and Empiricism
arundhatimukherjea
 
The Philosophical Problem of Evil
The Philosophical Problem of EvilThe Philosophical Problem of Evil
The Philosophical Problem of Evil
Braxton Hunter
 
1 The trinity
1   The trinity1   The trinity
1 The trinity
drrevdev
 
The Trinity
The TrinityThe Trinity
The Trinity
Jason Kichline
 
The Problem of Evil
The Problem of EvilThe Problem of Evil
The Problem of Evil
jcbrignell
 
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & KantEmpiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Aimee Hoover-Miller
 
Existence of god
Existence of godExistence of god
Existence of god
Sandeep Kumar
 
A2 The Problem Of Evil
A2 The Problem Of EvilA2 The Problem Of Evil
A2 The Problem Of Evil
j0hnharding
 
The trinity of god
The trinity of godThe trinity of god
The trinity of god
C.R. Draves
 
Contemporary Apologetics
Contemporary ApologeticsContemporary Apologetics
Contemporary Apologetics
Braxton Hunter
 
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartesRationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Aimee Hoover-Miller
 
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
ron shigeta
 
Faith And Reason
Faith And  ReasonFaith And  Reason
Faith And Reason
charlie roy
 
Existence of God - Does God really exist?
Existence of God - Does God really exist?Existence of God - Does God really exist?
Existence of God - Does God really exist?
StJohns Pondicherry
 
Natural Theology
Natural TheologyNatural Theology
Natural Theology
John Lynch
 
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
Third Column Ministries
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
Robin Schumacher
 

What's hot (20)

Apologetics 1 Introduction
Apologetics 1 IntroductionApologetics 1 Introduction
Apologetics 1 Introduction
 
Christian Apologetics Session 1
Christian Apologetics Session 1Christian Apologetics Session 1
Christian Apologetics Session 1
 
Who is god
Who is godWho is god
Who is god
 
Rationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and EmpiricismRationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism and Empiricism
 
The Philosophical Problem of Evil
The Philosophical Problem of EvilThe Philosophical Problem of Evil
The Philosophical Problem of Evil
 
1 The trinity
1   The trinity1   The trinity
1 The trinity
 
The Trinity
The TrinityThe Trinity
The Trinity
 
The Problem of Evil
The Problem of EvilThe Problem of Evil
The Problem of Evil
 
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & KantEmpiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
Empiricist epistemology – Hume & Kant
 
Existence of god
Existence of godExistence of god
Existence of god
 
A2 The Problem Of Evil
A2 The Problem Of EvilA2 The Problem Of Evil
A2 The Problem Of Evil
 
The trinity of god
The trinity of godThe trinity of god
The trinity of god
 
Contemporary Apologetics
Contemporary ApologeticsContemporary Apologetics
Contemporary Apologetics
 
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartesRationalist epistemology – rene descartes
Rationalist epistemology – rene descartes
 
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
4 Descartes, Rationalism and the Enlightenment
 
Faith And Reason
Faith And  ReasonFaith And  Reason
Faith And Reason
 
Existence of God - Does God really exist?
Existence of God - Does God really exist?Existence of God - Does God really exist?
Existence of God - Does God really exist?
 
Natural Theology
Natural TheologyNatural Theology
Natural Theology
 
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
Apologetics 1 Lesson 5 Faith and Reason and Science and Religion
 
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
The Essentials of Apologetics - Why Apologetics?
 

Viewers also liked

The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debateThe cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
MissMulholland
 
1-31
1-311-31
1-31
jimpict
 
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological ArgumentThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument
EmHope2797
 
A2 Ontological
A2 OntologicalA2 Ontological
A2 Ontological
j0hnharding
 
The Design Argument
The Design ArgumentThe Design Argument
The Design Argument
semmerson
 
Introduction of business ethics
Introduction of business ethicsIntroduction of business ethics
Introduction of business ethics
neha16sept
 
Business Ethics
Business EthicsBusiness Ethics
Business Ethics
tutor2u
 
Business ethics
Business ethicsBusiness ethics
Business ethics
Yasir Sheikh
 
Ethics
EthicsEthics

Viewers also liked (9)

The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debateThe cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
The cosmological argument Russell and Copleston debate
 
1-31
1-311-31
1-31
 
The Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological ArgumentThe Cosmological Argument
The Cosmological Argument
 
A2 Ontological
A2 OntologicalA2 Ontological
A2 Ontological
 
The Design Argument
The Design ArgumentThe Design Argument
The Design Argument
 
Introduction of business ethics
Introduction of business ethicsIntroduction of business ethics
Introduction of business ethics
 
Business Ethics
Business EthicsBusiness Ethics
Business Ethics
 
Business ethics
Business ethicsBusiness ethics
Business ethics
 
Ethics
EthicsEthics
Ethics
 

Similar to 2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)

Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
philipapeters
 
Larksy
LarksyLarksy
Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
philipapeters
 
Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
philipapeters
 
Anselm in Context .pptx
Anselm in Context .pptxAnselm in Context .pptx
Anselm in Context .pptx
Brendan Larvor
 
God Exists Essay
God Exists EssayGod Exists Essay
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach usBerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
Muhummadsaad1
 
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISMEVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
ALINA MATSENKO AND AJAY MISHRA ALINA AND AJAY
 
Teleological
TeleologicalTeleological
Teleological
James Burt
 
Philosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesisPhilosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesis
Hisahito Shinno
 
Atheism
AtheismAtheism
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
ThaddeusKozinski
 
Existence of God and Problem of Evil
Existence of God and Problem of EvilExistence of God and Problem of Evil
Existence of God and Problem of Evil
JohnnyVarman
 

Similar to 2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1) (13)

Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
 
Larksy
LarksyLarksy
Larksy
 
Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
 
Theistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for godTheistic proofs for god
Theistic proofs for god
 
Anselm in Context .pptx
Anselm in Context .pptxAnselm in Context .pptx
Anselm in Context .pptx
 
God Exists Essay
God Exists EssayGod Exists Essay
God Exists Essay
 
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach usBerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
BerkeleyPrinciplesSelections. Ppt outsidethe mind will teach us
 
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISMEVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
EVOLUTION OF HINDUISM FROM POLYTHEISM TO MONOTHEISM TO MONISM
 
Teleological
TeleologicalTeleological
Teleological
 
Philosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesisPhilosophy of religion synthesis
Philosophy of religion synthesis
 
Atheism
AtheismAtheism
Atheism
 
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
St. Ann Philosophy, Matter and Form, Proofs of God's Existence, Nov. 16, 2018...
 
Existence of God and Problem of Evil
Existence of God and Problem of EvilExistence of God and Problem of Evil
Existence of God and Problem of Evil
 

More from eilisbell

Titles
Titles Titles
Titles
eilisbell
 
Masthead anaylsis
Masthead anaylsisMasthead anaylsis
Masthead anaylsis
eilisbell
 
First annotations
First annotations First annotations
First annotations
eilisbell
 
Original image
Original image Original image
Original image
eilisbell
 
Annotations 4
Annotations 4Annotations 4
Annotations 4
eilisbell
 
Orginal image
Orginal image Orginal image
Orginal image
eilisbell
 
Black and white edit
Black and white edit Black and white edit
Black and white edit
eilisbell
 
Presentation1 marta cage
Presentation1 marta cage Presentation1 marta cage
Presentation1 marta cage
eilisbell
 
Annotations
Annotations Annotations
Annotations
eilisbell
 
Annotation for cage marta
Annotation for cage martaAnnotation for cage marta
Annotation for cage marta
eilisbell
 
Presentation2[1] (1)
Presentation2[1] (1)Presentation2[1] (1)
Presentation2[1] (1)
eilisbell
 

More from eilisbell (11)

Titles
Titles Titles
Titles
 
Masthead anaylsis
Masthead anaylsisMasthead anaylsis
Masthead anaylsis
 
First annotations
First annotations First annotations
First annotations
 
Original image
Original image Original image
Original image
 
Annotations 4
Annotations 4Annotations 4
Annotations 4
 
Orginal image
Orginal image Orginal image
Orginal image
 
Black and white edit
Black and white edit Black and white edit
Black and white edit
 
Presentation1 marta cage
Presentation1 marta cage Presentation1 marta cage
Presentation1 marta cage
 
Annotations
Annotations Annotations
Annotations
 
Annotation for cage marta
Annotation for cage martaAnnotation for cage marta
Annotation for cage marta
 
Presentation2[1] (1)
Presentation2[1] (1)Presentation2[1] (1)
Presentation2[1] (1)
 

2. anselm s_ontological_argument (1)

  • 1. Anselm’s Ontological Argument L/O – I will be able to explain Anselm’s two ontological arguments, and start to assess Gaunilo’s response. ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is trying to suggest and why?
  • 2. A predicate is… ‘an intrinsic property or quality of something’ Predicates of an elephant might be… A trunk, size, long ears, being a mammal, tusks, long memory, etc…
  • 4.  Anselm’s essential claim is… Existence is a predicate of God (it is a property or quality of God’s nature).
  • 5. Anselm’s First Argument 1) 2) 3) God is the greatest possible being which can be conceived (thought) of. God may exist either in the mind alone, or in reality as well. Something which exists in reality and in the mind is greater than something which exists just as an idea in the mind alone. Conclusion: 4) God must exist in reality and in the mind (or we have not thought of the greatest possible being).
  • 6. Features of the first argument (for an essay plan). 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) ‘a being which nothing greater can be conceived’: Anselm expects everyone will accept this definition. Painter and painting analogy (mind and reality). Reductio ad absurdum – if he does exist in the mind alone then he is not greatest possible being. God’s existence is analytic (once we analyse the definition of the term we will see that God exists). Anyone who doesn’t accept it is a ‘fool’, as it is plain and obvious.
  • 7. Anselm’s second argument 1) 2) God is that being nothing greater than which can be thought of. Something which cannot be thought not to exist is greater than anything which can be thought not to exist. Conclusion: 3) Therefore, it is impossible to think that this being (God) cannot exist.
  • 8. Argument 2: In simpler language… You can’t think of anything greater than God. 2) Necessary things are greater than contingent things. Conclusion 1) 3) God is necessary
  • 9. Features of Anselm’s second argument 1) This adds the idea that it is impossible for God not to exist – in other words, God is necessary. 2) It has been argued that his second argument was aimed at believers as a proof that existence in God is rational – to justify a belief in God.
  • 10. Gaunilo’s response  Gaunilo was a contemporary of Anselm, he was a monk who rejected Anselm’s argument in ‘On Behalf of the fool’ using three arguments…. 1) On Gossip – the fool could have all kinds of made up things in his head, gossip for instance is unreliable – how should he be able to discern what is true and what is not? You can’t define things into existence The Perfect Island 2) 3)
  • 12.  Think of some other examples you could include to demonstrate the point about the Perfect Island in an essay…
  • 13.  Plantinga – Islands are different to God – there could always be a more perfect Island - more dancing girls, more lush palm trees, twice the size, etc. – idea of a greatest possible island is incoherent. God on the other hand is maximally great – nothing greater is possible.
  • 14. Homework Use the info in this Powerpoint and the last (they’re on moodle) to write an essay plan for ‘Explain Anselm’s ontological arguments…’ (25 marks).  Pick three main points and write out three paragraphs. For next lesson 