The document discusses local and regional PV power forecasting based on PV measurements, satellite data, and numerical weather predictions. It summarizes a PV power prediction system that uses different data sources and models for various forecast horizons, from 15 minutes to 5 hours ahead. The system combines persistence forecasts, satellite-derived cloud motion forecasts, PV simulations using numerical weather predictions, and statistical models to improve forecast accuracy compared to individual models. Regional forecasts for Germany show lower errors than single site forecasts.
SEMANCO Workshop: Analysing and Visualising energy related data in our buildings, towns, and cities.
http://semanco-visualization-workshop.blogspot.com.es/
La Salle Campus Barcelona, Spain, 11-12 April 2013.
Calculation of conversion factors for the RVC method in accordance with CISPR...Mathias Magdowski
This slide set gives a brief introduction on what an electromagnetic reverberation chamber is and how its proper operation for radiated immunity tests and emission measurements can be validated. Finally, the procedure of a typical emission measurement and the application of the CISPR-16-4-5 standard to correlate the results with existing limits from other measurement environments is discussed.
Advanced weather forecasting for RES applications: Smart4RES developments tow...Leonardo ENERGY
Recording at: https://youtu.be/45Zpjog95QU
This is the 3rd Smart4RES webinar that will address technological and market challenges in RES prediction and will introduce the Smart4RES strategy to improve weather forecasting models with high resolution.
Through wind and solar applications, Innovative Numerical Weather Prediction and Large-Eddy Simulation approaches will be presented.
ICIS webinar - Price sensitivity analysis with neural networksICIS
The power markets are full of what if’s. The impact of renewable generation on spot power prices has naturally generated a great deal of volatility in the markets. Inputs and assumptions such as power demand, changing weather forecasts, and available capacities are just some of the key drivers that help predict the price of power. But what if there is more wind generation than expected? What happens if demand for power turns out to be stronger than anticipated?
While uncertainties in the market cannot be eliminated, they can be identified, quantified and their impact assessed on positions and portfolios. The goal of this webinar is to explain how Neural Networks power price models can help to assess the sensitivities that can impact spot prices in the German day ahead market and how you can use this to your advantage.
Photovoltaic Review -Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy System ISE Ashish Verma
It give the wide spectrum of Solar PV market, Technology share ,Installed capacity in various region ,material per Wp cost ,Inverter Cost and many more information about Solar PV industry .
2014 PV Distribution System Modeling Workshop: The IEA PVPS Task 14 High penetration PV in Electricity Grids, Roland Bruendlinger, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Competition and Regulation in Professional Services – KLEINER – June 2024 OEC...
16 lorenz local_and_regional_pv_power
1. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 11
Local and regional PV power forecasting
based on
PV measurements, satellite data
and numerical weather predictions
Elke Lorenz, Jan Kühnert, Björn Wolff,
Annette Hammer, Detlev Heinemann
1)Energy Meteorology Group, Institute of Physics,
University of Oldenburg
1
2. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 2
Outline
grid integration of PV power in Germany
overview on PV power prediction system
evaluation:
different data and models for different forecast horizons
combination of different models
summary and outlook
2
3. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
3
4. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
3
control areas
5. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
by transmission system operators
regional forecasts
3
control areas
6. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
by transmission system operators
regional forecasts
direct marketing
local forecasts
3
control areas
7. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
by transmission system operators
regional forecasts
direct marketing
local forecasts
day ahead: for the next day
3
control areas
8. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
by transmission system operators
regional forecasts
direct marketing
local forecasts
day ahead: for the next day
intraday: until 45 minutes
before delivery
3
control areas
9. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Grid integration of PV in Germany
installed Power: 38.5GWpeak (end of 2014)
marketing of PV power at the European Energy Exchange
by transmission system operators
regional forecasts
direct marketing
local forecasts
day ahead: for the next day
intraday: until 45 minutes
before delivery
here: 15 min to 5 hours ahead
3
control areas
10. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 10
PV power
measurement
hoursforecast horizon
Overview of forecasting scheme
4
11. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 11
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
hoursforecast horizon
Overview of forecasting scheme
4
13. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 13
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
PV power forecasting:
PV simulation and
statistical models
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Overview of forecasting scheme
4
14. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Numerical weather predictions
global model forecast (IFS)
of the European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
(ECWMF)
regional model forecasts (COSMO EU)
of the German Meteorological service
(DWD)
COSMO EU, dir. irradiance
2104-05-02, 12:00
5
15. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Numerical weather predictions
global model forecast (IFS)
of the European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
(ECWMF)
regional model forecasts (COSMO EU)
of the German Meteorological service
(DWD)
Post processing:
bias correction and combination
with linear regression
COSMO EU, dir. irradiance
2104-05-02, 12:00
5
16. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Meteosat Second Generation (high resolution visible range)
cloud index from
Meteosat images with
Heliosat method*
resolution in Germany
1.2km x 2.2 km
15 minutes
Irradiance prediction
based on satellite data
6
*Hammer et al 2003
17. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
cloud index from
Meteosat images with
Heliosat method
cloud motion vectors by
identification of matching
cloud structures in
consecutive images
extrapolation of
cloud motion to predict
future cloud index
Irradiance prediction
based on satellite data
Meteosat Second Generation (high resolution visible range)
6
18. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
satellite derived irradiance maps
cloud index from
Meteosat images with
Heliosat method
cloud motion vectors by
identification of matching
cloud structures in
consecutive images
extrapolation of
cloud motion to predict
future cloud index
irradiance from predicted
cloud index images with
Heliosat method
Irradiance prediction
based on satellite data
200W/m2 900W/m2
6
19. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Measurement data
March- November 2013
15 minute values
921 PV systems1) in Germany
information on PV system
tilt and orientation
19
1)Monitoring data base of Meteocontrol GmbH
7
20. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 20
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
PV power forecasting:
PV simulation and
statistical models
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Overview of forecasting scheme
8
21. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 21
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Overview of forecasting scheme
8
Pmeas(t-Dt)
Pclear(t-Dt)
persistence:
constant ratio of
measured PV power Pmeas
to clear sky PV power Pclear
Ppers (t)= Pclear(t)
22. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Different input data and models
22
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
persistence
8
PV simulation:
Diffuse fraction model:
Skartveith et al, 1998
Tilt model: Klucher 1970
Parametric model for MPP
efficiency: Beyer et al 2004
Linear regression
23. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
PV simulation
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Different input data and models
PV simulationpersistence
8
24. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
9
25. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 9
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
26. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 9
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
27. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 9
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
28. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 9
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
29. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 9
Regional forecasts:
persistence, CMV and NWP based forecasts
30. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
15 minute values
normalization to installed power Pinst
only daylight values, calculation time of CMV: sunel > 10°
only hours with all models available included in dependence of forecast horizon
N
i
inst
pred
inst
meas
P
P
P
P
N
rmse 1
2
1
10
31. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
forecasts for German average
CMV forecasts better than
NWP based forecast
up to 4 hours ahead
10
N
i
inst
pred
inst
meas
P
P
P
P
N
rmse 1
2
1
15 minute values
normalization to installed power Pinst
only daylight values, calculation time of CMV: sunel > 10°
only hours with all models available included in dependence of forecast horizon
32. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
forecasts for German average
CMV forecasts better than
NWP based forecast
up to 4 hours ahead
persistence better than
CMV forecasts
up to 1.5 hour ahead
10
N
i
inst
pred
inst
meas
P
P
P
P
N
rmse 1
2
1
15 minute values
normalization to installed power Pinst
only daylight values, calculation time of CMV: sunel > 10°
only hours with all models available included in dependence of forecast horizon
33. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
11
comparison of German average and single site forecasts:
rmse for German about 1/3 of single sites rmse for NWP forecasts
German average single sites
34. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
11
comparison of German average and single site forecasts:
rmse for German about 1/3 of single sites rmse for NWP forecasts
improvements with persistence and CMV larger for regional forecasts
German average single sites
35. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 35
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
PV simulation*
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Different input data and models
PV simulation*persistence
12
*)PV simulation
with bias correction
36. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 36
PV power predictions
PV power
measurement
satellite cloud motion
forecast CMV
dayshours
PV simulation
NWP: numerical
weather prediction
forecast horizon
Combination of different models
PV simulationpersistence
combination
12
37. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 13
Combination of forecasting methods
combination of forecast models with linear regression:
Pcombi=aNWPPNWP + aCMVPCMV + apersistPpersist + a0
coefficients aNWP, aCMV, apersist, a0 are fitted to measured data
38. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 13
Combination of forecasting methods
combination of forecast models with linear regression:
Pcombi=aNWPPNWP + aCMVPCMV + apersistPpersist + a0
coefficients aNWP, aCMV, apersist, a0 are fitted to measured data
in dependence of
forecast horizon
hour of the day
39. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 13
Combination of forecasting methods
combination of forecast models with linear regression:
Pcombi=aNWPPNWP + aCMVPCMV + apersistPpersist + a0
coefficients aNWP, aCMV, apersist, a0 are fitted to measured data
in dependence of
forecast horizon
hour of the day
training data:
for single site forecasts: each PV system separately
40. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 13
Combination of forecasting methods
combination of forecast models with linear regression:
Pcombi=aNWPPNWP + aCMVPCMV + apersistPpersist + a0
coefficients aNWP, aCMV, apersist, a0 are fitted to measured data
in dependence of
forecast horizon
hour of the day
training data:
for single site forecasts: each PV system separately
for regional forecasts: average of sites
41. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 14
Combination of forecasting methods
How many days to train forecast combination?
Improvement score:
with respect to best single model
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓 − 𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑖
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓
all sites average, May to November, 2012
42. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 14
Combination of forecasting methods
How many days to train forecast combination?
Improvement score:
with respect to best single model
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓 − 𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑖
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓
all sites average, May to November, 2012
independent test year for model configuration
43. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 14
Combination of forecasting methods
How many days to train forecast combination?
Improvement score:
with respect to best single model
last 30 days
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓 − 𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑖
𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓
all sites average, May to November, 2012
44. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Regional forecasts
regression coefficients in dependence of forecast horizon
15
bars:
standard deviation for all hours
regression coefficients (weights) reflect horizon dependent
forecast performance of different models
45. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Regional forecasts
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizons
15
Considerable improvement with combined model
over single model forecasts
46. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 16
Single site forecasts
regression coefficients in dependence of forecast horizon
bars:
standard deviation
for all hours & sites
regression coefficients (weights) reflect horizon dependent
forecast performance of different models for single sites
47. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Regression coefficients
16
bars:
standard deviation
for all hours & sites
horizon dependent regression coefficients different for
regional and single site forecasts
German average single sites
48. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Rmse in dependence of forecast horizon
forecast combination outperforms single model forecasts
for all horizons
improvements with combination larger for regional forecasts
17
German average single sites
49. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 49
Summary
PV power prediction contributes to successful
grid integration of more than 38 GWpeak PV power in Germany
18
50. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 50
Summary
PV power prediction contributes to successful
grid integration of more than 38 GWpeak PV power in Germany
PV power forecasts based on satellite data (CMV) significantly
better than NWP based forecasts up to 4 hours ahead
18
51. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 51
Summary
PV power prediction contributes to successful
grid integration of more than 38 GWpeak PV power in Germany
PV power forecasts based on satellite data (CMV) significantly
better than NWP based forecasts up to 4 hours ahead
significant improvement by combining different
forecast models with PV power measurements,
in particular for regional forecasts
18
52. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany 52
Outlook
combination of machine learning with PV simulation
for integration of additional data sources:
additional meteorological parameters
additional NWP systems
uncertainty information
19
53. October 22nd 2015, 4th PV Modelling Workshop, Köln, Germany
Thank you for your attention!
EU-FP7 grant agreement no: 308991
20