Study guide human rights-topic-area-a rotaract global mun 2015Adrian Dan Pop
For centuries, protection has been granted to people who flee persecution. However, the
current refugee regime seems to be the product of the last fifty years of the 20th century. The
origins of the modern refugee law can be found in the aftermath of the World World II, due to the
refugee crisis of the precedent years.n refugee regime is largely the product of the second half of
the twentieth century.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter: UDHR) guarantees the right to
seek and enjoy asylum in other countries. Other human rights instruments 1 have also guaranteed
the “right to seek and be granted asylum in a foreign territory, in accordance with the legislation
of the state and international conventions.”2
Humanitarian crises and the management of Refugees in Central Africa (A case...Kempess
This article is a vivid study of the phenomenon, conditions and socio -economic situations of Refugees in Cameroon. With field interviews and in-depth research , the article It explores the causes of the refugee problem in Cameroon, dis into their living conditions and makes recommendations to Government, policy makers and international stakeholders for the improvement of the refugee treatments and better management of refugee crises in Cameroon and Africa.
WPA/CAREIF Position Statement EUROPE Migrant Crisis.Albert Persaud
Position Statement: Europe Migrant & Refugee Crisis. Migrant, Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ Needs in Europe.
World Psychiatric Association along with Careif and the Centre for Psychiatry -a WPA Collaborating Centre - in Queen Mary, University of London, calls for action.
Study guide human rights-topic-area-a rotaract global mun 2015Adrian Dan Pop
For centuries, protection has been granted to people who flee persecution. However, the
current refugee regime seems to be the product of the last fifty years of the 20th century. The
origins of the modern refugee law can be found in the aftermath of the World World II, due to the
refugee crisis of the precedent years.n refugee regime is largely the product of the second half of
the twentieth century.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter: UDHR) guarantees the right to
seek and enjoy asylum in other countries. Other human rights instruments 1 have also guaranteed
the “right to seek and be granted asylum in a foreign territory, in accordance with the legislation
of the state and international conventions.”2
Humanitarian crises and the management of Refugees in Central Africa (A case...Kempess
This article is a vivid study of the phenomenon, conditions and socio -economic situations of Refugees in Cameroon. With field interviews and in-depth research , the article It explores the causes of the refugee problem in Cameroon, dis into their living conditions and makes recommendations to Government, policy makers and international stakeholders for the improvement of the refugee treatments and better management of refugee crises in Cameroon and Africa.
WPA/CAREIF Position Statement EUROPE Migrant Crisis.Albert Persaud
Position Statement: Europe Migrant & Refugee Crisis. Migrant, Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ Needs in Europe.
World Psychiatric Association along with Careif and the Centre for Psychiatry -a WPA Collaborating Centre - in Queen Mary, University of London, calls for action.
Unhcr intro and handy guide of unhcr for slideshareMamataPathak
It is full UN organization since it is created by UN General assembly within UN framework. This organization follows the notion of migration management but there is underlying differences between International Organization of Migration(IOM) and UNHCR. The first difference is IOM was not created within UN framework.
It was created as per UN general resolution in 1950 for the duration of 2 years to settle European refugees after world war II. And then renewed for three years and then renewed for 5 years and then later renewed till refugees exists. Like UN General assembly created them it can also be deleted.
Mission: It has two pillars since established.
International protection of the refugees and for this to collaborate with states the problems of the refugees and promote protection of refugees.
To provide resolution or assist in the durable solution by helping refugees to return to their own country or to settle permanently in another country.
This video includes explanation of UN and Handy Guide of UN.
The content in this PDF is entirely the information on the website of UNHCR and its publication.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U8xmOK0lzY&feature=youtu.be
You can also find the same content in the Youtube
Unhcr intro and handy guide of unhcr for slideshareMamataPathak
It is full UN organization since it is created by UN General assembly within UN framework. This organization follows the notion of migration management but there is underlying differences between International Organization of Migration(IOM) and UNHCR. The first difference is IOM was not created within UN framework.
It was created as per UN general resolution in 1950 for the duration of 2 years to settle European refugees after world war II. And then renewed for three years and then renewed for 5 years and then later renewed till refugees exists. Like UN General assembly created them it can also be deleted.
Mission: It has two pillars since established.
International protection of the refugees and for this to collaborate with states the problems of the refugees and promote protection of refugees.
To provide resolution or assist in the durable solution by helping refugees to return to their own country or to settle permanently in another country.
This video includes explanation of UN and Handy Guide of UN.
The content in this PDF is entirely the information on the website of UNHCR and its publication.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U8xmOK0lzY&feature=youtu.be
You can also find the same content in the Youtube
تقرير تدقيق حول المحروقات و منظومة الدّعم - تونس Moez
#وينو_البترول
تقرير تدقيق حول المحروقات و منظومة الدّعم - تونس
Rapport sur le système des compensation des hydrocarbures en Tunisie
( ETAP / STIR / STEG )
#winuoelpetrole
WPA/CAREIF Position Statement EUROPE Migrant Crisis.MrBiswas
Position Statement: Europe Migrant & Refugee Crisis: Migrant, Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ Needs in Europe: World Psychiatric Association along with Careif and the Centre for Psychiatry -a WPA Collaborating Centre - in Queen Mary, University of London, calls for action.
This Global Appeal provides updated information for governments, private donors, partners and other readers interested in UNHCR’s priorities and budgeted activities for 2023 to protect and improve the lives of tens of millions of people – refugees, asylum-seekers, returnees, internally displaced people, stateless persons, and others of concern to UNHCR. It highlights the challenges faced by UNHCR and its partners in attempting to respond to multiple life-threatening crises and ever-growing humanitarian needs
FMO has adopted the definition of ‘forced migration’ promoted by the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration (IASFM) which describes it as ‘a general term that refers to the movements of refugees and internally displaced people (those displaced by conflicts) as well as people displaced by natural or environmental disasters, chemical or nuclear disasters, famine, or development projects.’ FMO views forced migration as a complex, wide-ranging and pervasive set of phenomena. The study of forced migration is multidisciplinary, international, and multisectoral, incorporating academic, practitioner, agency and local perspectives. FMO focuses on three separate, although sometimes simultaneous and inter-related, types of forced migration. These three types are categorized according to their causal factors: conflict, development policies and projects, and disasters.
Unhcr intro and handy guide of unhcr for slideshareMamataPathak
UNHCR complete Explanation
The source of this document is website of UNHCR and its official publication.
You can find the same material in Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U8xmOK0lzY&feature=youtu.be
Hope you will like it.
■ IntroductionRefugees are migrants who leave their countrie.docxoswald1horne84988
■ Introduction
Refugees are migrants who leave their countries of ori-
gin for asylum, or a safe place to live, because of ongo-
ing armed conflict or fear of persecution based on their
religion, race, nationality, political affiliation, or mem-
bership in a persecuted social group, or a combination
of these items, within their home countries. Refugees
are either unwilling or unable to return to their coun-
tries of origin. The types of persecution that refugees
fear include cruel and inhumane treatment, unjust pun-
ishments, and threats of torture or death.
Unlike immigrants, who leave their home countries
seeking economic, educational, or social opportunities,
refugees seek to escape persecution and harm. Like inter-
nally displaced persons (IDPs), refugees are displaced from
their home because of safety and other humanitarian
concerns. IDPs remain in their country, however, under
the protection of their own government, while refugees
leave theirs. Refugees displaced outside of their home coun-
tries usually cannot return home, in contrast to immigrants,
who typically have the ability to return home without fear
of intimidation and oppression.
Causes of Displacement
One major reason why refugees are displaced is because
they live in a war zone caused by conflicts between their
home country and other countries. Other refugees leave
their homes because they face internal conflicts such as
civil wars or terrorism, and still others leave because of
turmoil caused by armed conflicts between neighboring
states. Refugees also flee due to agricultural problems
and food scarcity caused by water shortages and deserti-
fication, as well as by natural disasters such as floods,
earthquakes, hurricanes, and tornadoes. (Desertification
is the process of productive agricultural land being
turned into desert through deforestation, industrial ag-
riculture, or drought, or a combination of such items.)
Additionally, an economic collapse within a country or
fluctuations in local or international financial markets can
cause people to leave a country for safety and jobs
elsewhere. Some people live in fragile nations governed by
unpredictable dictators or weak or illegitimate political
systems, and these refugees choose to leave because of fear
of persecution or systemic instability. Finally, dangerous
cultural conflicts involving persecution over religion, lan-
guage, education, sexual orientation, and other factors also
cause people to flee their homes and seek asylum elsewhere.
International Understanding
of Refugee Status
Whatever the causes of refugees’ flight, their status is
defined and protected by international laws endorsed by
the members of the United Nations (UN), a body of
diplomatic representatives from countries around the
world. One such law, Article 1 of the Universal Declara-
tion of Human Rights (1948), states that “all human
beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”
and “should act towards one another in a spirit of
brotherhood.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed on-line journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socioeconomic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers, AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
UN Guiding Principles on IDPs (1998 English)fatanews
Principle 22 - Internally displaced persons, whether or not they are living in camps, shall not be discriminated against as a result of their displacement in the enjoyment of the right to vote and to participate in governmental and public affairs, including the right to have access to the means necessary to exercise this right.
Similar to Rapport du Conseil des Droits de l'Homme de l'ONU sur la situation au camp de la Choucha (Eng 05/2013) (20)
International Institute for Opinion Polls Studies
تحدّث رئيس منتدى العلوم الاجتماعية،عبد الوهاب حفيظ اليوم الإربعاء في مداخلة له عن نتائج آخر استطلاع رأي قام به المنتدى خلال الفترة الفاصلة بين 22 ماي و3 جوان الجاري.
و يحتل رئيس حزب نداء تونس الباجي قائد السبسي الصدارة بالنسبة لنوايا التصويت في الانتخابات الرئاسية المقبلة بنسبة 23.2 بالمائة يليه حمادي الجبالي بنسبة 14.4 بالمائة والمنصف المرزوقي ب9 بالمائة.أما بالنسبة للانتخابات التشريعية،فتحتل حركة النهضة المرتبة الاولى بنسبة نوايا تصويت ب38 بالمائة مقابل 33 بالمائة لحركة نداء تونس و6 بالمائة لحزب التكتل من أجل العمل والحريات و5 بالمائة لفائدة الجبهة الشعبية.
مقارنة بين رؤية التكتل لدستور الجمهورية الثانية (فيفري 2012) وما تحقق في صياغ...Moez
عَكَسَ تصويت المجلس الوطني التأسييس على الدستور في 26 جانفي 2014 صورة لقدرة التونسيين على التوافق رغم الإختلاف.
وسيصف التاريخ التجربة التونسية في الإنتقال الديمقراطي بأنها كانت تجربة التوافق بإمتياز. فقد تمكنت العائلات السياسية بإختلاف
توجهاتها من صياغة نص دستوري يوحّد كل المواطنين والمواطنات. وقد نجح التكتل في أن يكون جسر الثقة والتواصل بين كل الفرقاء السياسيين ولعب بذلك دوراً هاماً في ترسيخ مبادئ الوسطية وبناء مجتمع المواطنة على أسس الحرية، والمساواة، والعدالة الإجتماعية والتضامن.
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
Rapport du Conseil des Droits de l'Homme de l'ONU sur la situation au camp de la Choucha (Eng 05/2013)
1. GE.13-14066
Human Rights Council
Twenty-third session
Agenda item 3
Promotion and protection of all human rights,
civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights,
including the right to development
Joint written statement*
submitted by the International
Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination (EAFORD), the Union of Arab Jurists, the
Arab Lawyers Union, the General Arab Women Federation
(GAWF), North-South XX1, the United Towns Agency for
the North-South Cooperation, the Indian Movement “Tupaj
Amaru”, Organisation pour la Communication en Afrique et
de Promotion de la Coopération Economique Internationale -
OCAPROCE International and the World Wide
Organization for Women (WOW), non-governmental
organizations in special consultative status; the World Peace
Council and International Educational Development, Inc.
(IED), non-governmental organizations on the roster
The Secretary-General has received the following written statement, which is circulated in
accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31.
[16 May 2013]
*
This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting
non-governmental organization(s).
United Nations A/HRC/23/NGO/103
General Assembly Distr.: General
28 May 2013
English only
2. A/HRC/23/NGO/103
2
Report on the rejected asylum seekers of Choucha Refugee
Camp*
The Choucha refugee camp, created following the war in Libya, is being closed. After two
years of living in the desert, approximately 250 rejected asylum seekers have not been
given any durable solution to their situation.
Choucha Camp
Asylum seekers in Choucha were required to go through a "Refugee Status Determination-
Process" (RSD) managed by UNHCR, which included personal interviews. In case of
rejection, applicants were given the possibility to submit a written appeal. If the appeal is
rejected, then the rejection becomes final. Persons granted refugee status are considered for
a resettlement-program, which, if accepted, consists of reinstallation in a host country with
a functioning asylum system.
On 29 March 2013 there were only 819 recognized refugees still living in the camp, along
with an additional 30 people who were still undergoing the asylum process,1
and
approximately 250 rejected asylum seekers.
By the onset of 2013, the inhabitants of Choucha Camp could be divided into five
categories:
• Recognized refugees approved for resettlement by UNHCR
• Refugees recognized by UNHCR, but not yet accepted for resettlement
• Refugees without possibility of resettlement because they registered after the
resettlement program deadline of 1st
December 2011
• Rejected asylum seekers: These are persons who have undergone the RSD
procedure, but were not granted refugee status by UNHCR. They are no longer
under the protection of the UNHCR and are deprived from camp services (food,
medical care and other services). Despite their unofficial status in the camp and their
marginalization, they continue to live there, struggling to find a solution.
Examples of malpractice by UNHCR
Problems caused by information sharing: UNHCR works closely with diplomatic and
consular- and hence intelligence and security- staff of foreign embassies. This is not only
unnecessary; it is dangerous and should never be done. At Choucha, it is clear that in a
number of cases, this information sharing prejudiced refugees’ claims for asylum. On a
number of occasions, refugees’ claims for status were rejected after visits by officials from
the country concerned. While the evidence is circumstantial, the fact that it has occurred on
*
Centre de Tunis pour la Migration et l'Asile (CeTuMA), Geneva International Centre for Justice
(GICJ), , BRussels Tribunal, Arab Lawyers Association- UK, Association of Humanitarian Lawyers
(AHL), The Iraqi Commission on Human Rights (ICHR), Monitoring Net of Human Rights in Iraq
(MHRI), International Coalition against War Criminals (ICAWC), The African Association of
Human Rights (AAHR), Protection of Human Rights Defenders in the Arab World, the International
Network of Arab Human Rights NGOs, International Lawyers.org, Association of Human Rights
Defenders in Iraq (AHRDI), The Iraqi Centre for Human Rights and Association internationale des
droits de l'homme, NGOs without consultative status, also share the views expressed in this statement.
1
UNHCR Zarziz: Persons of concerno f UNHCR in Shousha camp, Demographics. 29 March 2013.
3. A/HRC/23/NGO/103
3
several occasions is compelling. The most corrosive and incontestable effect of such
unauthorized information sharing is on the refugees themselves. Aware that what they said
in their RSD interview was likely to be shared with the governments or agencies from
which they were fleeing, those remaining were seriously inhibited in what they said. This
was particularly significant for the large majority who still had family members in their
country of origin.
• Problems in the handling of asylum seeker files: Mistakes have occurred in the
transcription of names and in the designation of nationalities from one file to
another. These unprofessional errors led to an atmosphere of mistrust by asylum
seekers towards UNHCR.
• Misinformation regarding the processes: The UNHCR’s guidelines, “Procedural
Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR's Mandate”, underline
the importance of providing information to asylum seekers regarding the RSD
process. Nevertheless, asylum seekers in Choucha Camp have reported that the
process was not clearly explained to them. The RSD process requires asylum seekers
to recount their personal past with precise facts. This task is extremely difficult for
persons who have undergone, and are obligated to talk about, traumatic experiences.
The lack of information about the procedure leaves asylum seekers unprepared and
unable to meet requirements.
• Lack of legal aid: Asylum seekers were not provided any legal aid other than
counseling provided by UNHCR. Accounting to UNHCR, “At all stages of the
procedure, including at the admissibility stage, asylum-seekers should receive
guidance and advice on the procedure and have access to legal counsel.”2
As in all legal procedures, and particularly with regards to asylum claims, it is
essential that individuals be informed of their rights, obligations, status and options.
Throughout any asylum claim and especially in the cases of appeal, it is of utmost
importance to be assisted by a neutral legal representative who should accompany
the asylum seeker, ensure adherence to the applicant’s rights and take appropriate
action if these are violated. This lack of legal independent counseling deprived
asylum seekers at Choucha Camp of a fair judgment.
• Lack of professional translation: There were no professional translation services
provided to refugees. In some cases, UNHCR deployed interpreters that belonged to
clans or ethnic groups opposed to those of the asylum seekers. This was the case
with Arab Darfurians and African Darfurians. UNHCR guidelines advise the use of
qualified interpreters and explain that external interpreters may be used, if their
qualification is guaranteed and if their relation to the asylum seeker is asserted. Lack
of professional interpreters during interviews may lead to cases where asylum
seekers feel uncomfortable to speak freely or their responses are not interpreted
correctly. Even in cases where the interpretation is done accurately, the translation
of an asylum claim by another inhabitant of the camp is a huge interference in the
personal life of the former.
• Lack of information in cases of rejection: UNHCR did not provide rejected
asylum seekers with sufficient information regarding the reasons for their first
rejection. It is crucial for asylum seekers to fully understand the weak points in their
claims in order to ensure appropriate preparation for an appeal.
2
UNHCR (2001): Global Consultation on International Protection. Asylum Processes. Fair and
Efficient Asylum Procedures.
4. A/HRC/23/NGO/103
4
• Problems with camp management: UNHCR created a division between rejected
and recognized refugees. Rejected refugees have been deprived of food and money
and are unable to receive medical care as they do not possess an ID card, which is
only issued to recognized refugees. UNHCR staff also told refugees to not share
their food and money with the rejected asylum seekers. These separations
exacerbated tensions, which created conflicts and divisions between these groups.
Possible options for rejected asylum seekers
• Returning to their home country: The International Organization for Migration
has proposed an assisted "voluntary" return for all those rejected. However, for the
majority of these people, returning to their countries means that they may be
subjected to serious violations of their human rights. The fact that asylum seekers
have remained in this desert camp for two years, facing extremely difficult weather
conditions, a lack of a private life and hardships with regards to basic needs, attests
to the seriousness and validity of their fear and the danger they would face if they
were to return to their countries.
• Going back to Libya: Although the war in Libya has ended, foreigners and
particularly sub-Saharan migrants are exposed to serious risks of violence and
human rights violations mainly due to insecurity and to the reign of militias.
• Crossing the Mediterranean into Europe: Another unofficial solution which is
considered by many of those rejected is to attempt to reach Europe by boat, which
poses great risks to their lives. In 2011 and 2012, frustrated by the slow progress of
asylum procedures, some refugees decided to attempt to cross the Mediterranean.
Many of them are still missing3
. More than 1,5004
deaths and disappearances at sea
were counted in 2011 by international organizations (i.e. UNHCR, Migreurop,
FortresseEurope). This fact increases our fears and concerns for the safety of all
those concerned5
.
• Staying in Tunisia illegally: This last solution would leave people in a situation of
lawlessness and insecurity. Without possessing any documentation from UNHCR,
they can be imprisoned at any time. In Tunisia, illegal foreigners are being held in
detention until they are able to raise sufficient funds to pay their own deportation.
Requests
Rejected asylum seekers have organized themselves and have led several actions and
claims against UNHCR, the EU delegation in Tunisia, international organizations and
embassies. On 28 of January 2013, rejected asylum seekers, supported by international and
Tunisian activists, organized a sit-in in front of UNHCR’s headquarters in Tunis. They also
protested at the World Social Forum in an attempt to raise international support and
awareness about their humanitarian situation.
All NATO and non-NATO states that were involved in the Libyan war have an indisputable
responsibility to assist in the resolution of the humanitarian problems resulting from the
crisis. This matter should not be considered solely as a Tunisian problem, but instead must
be regarded as an international issue.
3
Nicanor Haon, “Tunisie: pas de printemps pour les migrants”, FTDES, Gisti, 2012.
4
UNHCR, “Triste record pour les traversées de la Méditerranée par les migrants et les réfugiés en
2011”, briefing, 31 January 2012; http://www.unhcr.fr/4f280ad3c.html
5
FTDES, “La situation des réfugiés du camp de Choucha”, with the collaboration of B4P network,
August 2012.
5. A/HRC/23/NGO/103
5
Therefore we urge international organizations and all governments to meet their
commitments and responsibilities under international conventions for the protection of
human rights. Rejected asylum seekers currently remaining in the Choucha Camp must be
protected and relocated to safe countries.
Furthermore, UNHCR itself states that “until now, no state has been able to successfully
develop strategies, which would allow to distinguish in a just and effective manner between
refugees with a well-founded fear of persecution and migrants with economic or other
motivation.”6
As outlined in this report, the mistakes committed during the Refugee Status
Determination process in Choucha show that the status of rejected asylum seekers does not
respond to objective criteria. Under the circumstances, rejected asylum seekers must be
given the opportunity to undergo a new RSD procedure.
6
Original: Kein Staat hat bisher erfolgreich Strategien zu entwickeln vermocht, mit denen sich gerecht
und wirksam zwischen Flüchtlingen mit begründeter Furcht vor Verfolgung und Migranten mit
wirtschaftlichen oder anderen Motiven unterscheiden lässt.“ UNHCR (2000): Zur Lage der
Flüchtlinge in der Welt. UNHCR-Report 2000/2001. 50 Jahre humanitärer Einsatz. Bonn.