SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 93
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
新生兒壞死性腸炎
Presenter: 凌郁翔、許茵茵、向芷萱
Advisor: 劉君恕 主任
蔡昕霖 醫師
Date: 12/10/2015
臨床病例報告
PATIENT BASIC DATA
 Name :林○彤
 Gender: F, twin A
 GA: 25+3 weeks , BBW: 438g via C/S
 Chart number: 42692740
 Admission date: 2015/10/22~ now
AFTER BIRTH…
 Extremely prematurity
 Poor crying and activity
 severe substernal, intercostal retraction were
noted
 Admitted for further evaluation & treatment
HOSPITAL COURSE
10/23~10/31 brain echo: Bilateral IVH
progression to Gr.II~III(10/25)
Cardiac echo(10/26): PDA, L->R shunt
(10/31): PDA closing
NPO from birth, 母乳塗嘴Q4H (10/27)
D5W 24ml/day + 1/2NS 12ml/day +
Albumin ~90 ml/kg/day 
TPN+1/2NS+Drug ~ 150 ml/kg/day
Soft abdomen
HOSPITAL COURSE
 10/29 Try 1cc Q4H,
 Pulmonary hemorrahge(10/29)
 10/30 SSC-20 1cc Q6H->Q3H
HOSPITAL COURSE
 11/01~11/07
 SSC-20 1cc Q3H->2cc q4h->3cc q3h ->4cc q3h
 11/03 Hypoglycemia, cause unknown (endocrine?
NTG side effect?)
HOSPITAL COURSE
 11/08~11/15
 [Nutrition] 6cc q3h daily 85mlBM+F SSC-24
8cc q3h (11/13)
 Staphylococcus capitis bacteremia s/p
Teicoplanin (11/10-)+ meropenem(11/10- 11/12)
 frequent desaturation noted->CXR 11/10
infiltration
HOSPITAL COURSE
 11/16~11/23
 11/18 Occational desaturation and bradycardia
noted: HR:88
 [Nutrition] BM+F SSC-24 12cc q3h -> 13cc q3h
HOSPITAL COURSE
 11/25
 Fever up to 38c noted in the
afternoonCRP=6.59
 Acidosis (pH 7.216, PaCO2 53.9, HCO3 22)noted.
 11/26
 Blood and mucinous stool noted in the afternoon
 Abdominal distention
 Suspect NEC-->Start NPO, TPN support
11/22
 Antibiotics: Meropenem (B/C: pseudomonas A)
 11/27
 Mucus and blood-tingled stool was noted
 KUB: dilated bowelNEC IIa
 11/30
 Abdominal distention persisted .
 Stool: dark brown, muscus decrease
 Anal tube insertion
11/27 11/30
Gaseous distension
of bowel loops
 12/02
 Abdominal distention progressed, especially right
upper quadrate, mild dark skin color, no heat
sensation or pulsation noted
 no stool passage note
 Bedside sono: showed a 2x2 mass noted at RUQ,
intussusception is less likely
 consult PEDS doctor
Try OG feeding 2c.c. water-soluable
contrast follow up KUB tomorrow
afternoon
12/03
Prescribed oral contrast in the morning
KUB at 12/3 4 pm:
some oral contrast still in stomach and
intestinal
KUB on 12/4 morning:
no contrast in stomach and much
improve than previous KUB
12/03
12/03 4pm 12/04 1AM
12/04 2PM 12/05 5AM
12/04
Arrange urgent surgery
期刊討論
 Introduction
 Differential Diagnosis
 Current Treatment Strategies
 Pathogenesis
 Preventive approaches
 Future considerations
INTRODUCTION
 Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and
devastating disease among neonates and has
become a priority for research because it’s
difficult to eradicate.
 It was first described before 1960, but the entity
was not recognized until after the advent of
modern neonatal intensive care.
 Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing
enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and
mortality have remained unchanged because of
ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
 Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and
devastating disease among neonates and has
become a priority for research because it’s
difficult to eradicate.
 It was first described before 1960, but the entity
was not recognized until after the advent of
modern neonatal intensive care.
 Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing
enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and
mortality have remained unchanged because of
ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
 Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and
devastating disease among neonates and has
become a priority for research because it’s
difficult to eradicate.
 It was first described before 1960, but the entity
was not recognized until after the advent of
modern neonatal intensive care.
 Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing
enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and
mortality have remained unchanged because of
ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
 The mean prevalence of the disorder is about 7%
among infants with a birth weight between 500
and 1500 g.
 The estimated rate of death associated with
necrotizing enterocolitis ranges between 20 and
30%, with the highest rate among infants
requiring surgery.
On the basis of large, multicenter, neonatal network
databases from the United States and Canada
 The mean prevalence of the disorder is about 7%
among infants with a birth weight between 500
and 1500 g.
 The estimated rate of death associated with
necrotizing enterocolitis ranges between 20 and
30%, with the highest rate among infants
requiring surgery.
On the basis of large, multicenter, neonatal network
databases from the United States and Canada
 The excessive inflammatory process initiated in
the highly immunoreactive intestine in
necrotizing enterocolitis extends the effects of the
disease systemically, affecting distant organs
such as the brain and placing affected infants at
substantially increased risk for
neurodevelopmental delays.
 An infant recovering from necrotizing
enterocolitis may have nearly a 25% chance of
microcephaly and serious neurodevelopmental
delays that will transcend concerns that pertain
to the gastrointestinal tract.
 The excessive inflammatory process initiated in
the highly immunoreactive intestine in
necrotizing enterocolitis extends the effects of the
disease systemically, affecting distant organs
such as the brain and placing affected infants at
substantially increased risk for
neurodevelopmental delays.
 An infant recovering from necrotizing
enterocolitis may have nearly a 25% chance of
microcephaly and serious neurodevelopmental
delays that will transcend concerns that pertain
to the gastrointestinal tract.
 The total annual estimated cost of caring for
affected infants in the United States is between
$500 million and $1 billion.
 Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were
hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected
preterm infants if surgery was required and more
than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.
 Bowel resection is the most severe complication
and major cause of the short-bowel disease.
 The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period
for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has
been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
 The total annual estimated cost of caring for
affected infants in the United States is between
$500 million and $1 billion.
 Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were
hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected
preterm infants if surgery was required and more
than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.
 Bowel resection is the most severe complication
and major cause of the short-bowel disease.
 The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period
for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has
been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
 The total annual estimated cost of caring for
affected infants in the United States is between
$500 million and $1 billion.
 Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were
hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected
preterm infants if surgery was required and more
than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.
 Bowel resection is the most severe complication
and major cause of the short-bowel disease.
 The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period
for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has
been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
 The total annual estimated cost of caring for
affected infants in the United States is between
$500 million and $1 billion.
 Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were
hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected
preterm infants if surgery was required and more
than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.
 Bowel resection is the most severe complication
and major cause of the short-bowel disease.
 The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period
for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has
been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
 However, the most typical initial signs and
symptoms of “classic” necrotizing enterocolitis in
a preterm infant include feeding intolerance,
abdominal distention, and bloody stools after 8 to
10 days of age.
 The pathognomonic findings on abdominal
radiography are pneumatosis intestinalis, portal
venous gas, or both.
 Early imaging signs that should raise the
suspicion of necrotizing enterocolitis include
dilated loops of bowel, a paucity of gas, and gas-
filled loops of bowel that are unaltered on
repeated examinations.
 Extraluminal air (“free air”) outside the bowel is
a sign of advanced necrotizing enterocolitis.
 Symptoms may progress rapidly, often within
hours, from subtle signs to abdominal
discoloration, intestinal perforation, and
peritonitis, leading to systemic hypotension that
requires intensive medical support, surgical
support, or both.
 Because of the lack of clear delineation of what
constitutes the diagnosis of classic NEC, the term
“necrotizing enterocolitis” often reflects a
spectrum of intestinal conditions that differ with
respect to pathogenesis and the strategies
required for prevention and treatment.
 Three forms of neonatal intestinal injury occur
most often: conditions primarily seen in term
infants, spontaneous intestinal perforations, and
classic necrotizing enterocolitis.
CONDITIONS PRIMARILY SEEN IN TERM INFANTS
 The disease usually occurs in the first week after
birth, but it differs from that seen in preterm
infants in that it is more often associated with
other problems, such as maternal illicit drug use,
intestinal anomalies (e.g., aganglionosis or
atresias), congenital heart disease, and perinatal
stress that may affect mesenteric blood flow.
SPONTANEOUS INTESTINAL PERFORATIONS
 Spontaneous intestinal perforation usually occurs
in the first several days after birth and is not
associated with enteral feeding.
 This disorder is characterized by only minimal
intestinal inflammation and necrosis, as
evidenced by low levels of serum inflammatory
cytokines.
 It has been associated with the administration of
indomethacin and with glucocorticoids such as
dexamethasone or hydrocortisone.
CLASSIC NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
 A systematic description of necrotizing
enterocolitis, the staging system described by
Bell et al., was first published in 1978 and
subsequently refined.
 Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings
and may include feeding intolerance, mild
abdominal distention, or both.
 Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as
pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to
detect on radiographs.
 One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a
perforated viscus, which may or may not be
associated with intestinal necrosis and which
could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal
perforation or dissected air from the pleural
cavity.
 Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings
and may include feeding intolerance, mild
abdominal distention, or both.
 Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as
pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to
detect on radiographs.
 One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a
perforated viscus, which may or may not be
associated with intestinal necrosis and which
could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal
perforation or dissected air from the pleural
cavity.
 Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings
and may include feeding intolerance, mild
abdominal distention, or both.
 Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as
pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to
detect on radiographs.
 One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a
perforated viscus, which may or may not be
associated with intestinal necrosis and which
could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal
perforation or dissected air from the pleural
cavity.
 Another classification system used to define
necrotizing enterocolitis more specifically is
published in the Vermont Oxford Network
Manual of Operations.
 This manual describes clinical and radiographic
findings, with one or more of each type of finding
(clinical or radiographic) required to establish a
diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis.
 The clinical findings include bilious gastric
aspirate or emesis, abdominal distention, and
occult gross blood in the stool, with the absence of
anal fissures.
 The imaging findings include pneumatosis
intestinalis, hepatobiliary gas, and
pneumoperitoneum.
 The clinical findings include bilious gastric
aspirate or emesis, abdominal distention, and
occult gross blood in the stool, with the absence of
anal fissures.
 The imaging findings include pneumatosis
intestinalis, hepatobiliary gas, and
pneumoperitoneum.
 Both Bell staging and Vermont-Oxford diagnostic
approach has similar shortcomings that severe
necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery can
develop in patients even though pneumatosis
intestinalis or portal gas has not been detected on
imaging.
 These patients may only have abdominal
distention, without intraluminal bowel gas, on
presentation.
 Thus, the ominous progression of the disease may
be missed, with a failure to intervene early
enough.
 A more reliable staging approach that allows for
aggressive preventive measures is needed, but it
will probably require the development of
biomarkers that accurately predict the full
expression of necrotizing enterocolitis.
CURRENT TREATMENT
STRATEGIES
 Almost all very-low-birth-weight infants have
intermittent gastrointestinal symptoms that may
cause concern, but most do not have necrotizing
enterocolitis.
 Definitive necrotizing enterocolitis may require
medical or surgical management based on the
clinical presentation.
 Medical intervention typically includes
abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad-
spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and
intravenous hyperalimentation.
 Surgical interventions are generally required in
patients with intestinal perforation or
deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g.,
shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil
count, or both).
 Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement,
exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased
bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
 Medical intervention typically includes
abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad-
spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and
intravenous hyperalimentation.
 Surgical interventions are generally required in
patients with intestinal perforation or
deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g.,
shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil
count, or both).
 Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement,
exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased
bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
 Medical intervention typically includes
abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad-
spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and
intravenous hyperalimentation.
 Surgical interventions are generally required in
patients with intestinal perforation or
deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g.,
shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil
count, or both).
 Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement,
exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased
bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE
 Two commonly used methods for treating
advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal
perforation are laparotomy and primary
peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.
 Two large multicenter studies concluded that the
type of procedure does not influence survival or
other clinically important early outcomes.
 The second study also showed that infants
treated with peritoneal drainage very often
required a subsequent laparotomy.
 Further analysis of the latter study showed no
immediate clinical status improvement when
peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE
 Two commonly used methods for treating
advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal
perforation are laparotomy and primary
peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.
 Two large multicenter studies concluded that the
type of procedure does not influence survival or
other clinically important early outcomes.
 The second study also showed that infants
treated with peritoneal drainage very often
required a subsequent laparotomy.
 Further analysis of the latter study showed no
immediate clinical status improvement when
peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE
 Two commonly used methods for treating
advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal
perforation are laparotomy and primary
peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.
 Two large multicenter studies concluded that the
type of procedure does not influence survival or
other clinically important early outcomes.
 The second study also showed that infants
treated with peritoneal drainage very often
required a subsequent laparotomy.
 Further analysis of the latter study showed no
immediate clinical status improvement when
peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE
 Two commonly used methods for treating
advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal
perforation are laparotomy and primary
peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.
 Two large multicenter studies concluded that the
type of procedure does not influence survival or
other clinically important early outcomes.
 The second study also showed that infants
treated with peritoneal drainage very often
required a subsequent laparotomy.
 Further analysis of the latter study showed no
immediate clinical status improvement when
peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
 A systematic review of several studies suggested
mortality was increased by more than 50% with
peritoneal drainage as compared with
laparotomy.
 Follow-up examinations at 18 to 22 months in
infants who had undergone surgery for
necrotizing enterocolitis in the neonatal period
showed a significantly reduced risk of death or
neurodevelopmental impairment among those
who had undergone a laparotomy as compared
with those who had undergone peritoneal
drainage.
 A systematic review of several studies suggested
mortality was increased by more than 50% with
peritoneal drainage as compared with
laparotomy.
 Follow-up examinations at 18 to 22 months in
infants who had undergone surgery for
necrotizing enterocolitis in the neonatal period
showed a significantly reduced risk of death or
neurodevelopmental impairment among those
who had undergone a laparotomy as compared
with those who had undergone peritoneal
drainage.
 These studies indicate that once surgery is
required, the outcome may be poor, a finding that
underscores the need for effective prevention.
PATHOGENESIS
MULTIFACTORIAL CAUSE
NEC
Intestinal
immaturity
Genetic
predispositio
n
Excessive
immunoreaction
Microbial
colonization
Imbalance in
microvascula
r tone
INTESTINAL IMMATURITY
 Risk of intestinal injury in preterm
baby
 Immature motility, digestion,
absorption, immune defenses, barrier
function, circulatory regulation
 Example:
Gastric acid
secretion
limited
H2 blockers
NEC↑
INTESTINAL IMMATURITY
 Excessive inflammatory response
 Preterm baby against luminal
microbial stimuli ↑, and alter barrier
in the intestine
 TLR4↑, IkB and NF-kB↓ (fetus v.s. adult)
 Cytokine , IL-8↑ necrosis and
production of acute-phase protein in
the gut↑
 Enterocytes of preterm baby are not
prepared for the excessive stimulation
of initial postnatal colonization
MICROBIAL COLONIZATION
 Inappropriate microbial colonization
 Preterm baby NEC occurs until 8-10
days post partum
 Experiment: NEC do not occur in
germ-free animals
 NEC baby always has bacteremia and
endotoxemia
MICROBIAL COLONIZATION
 Preliminary studies
 Groups:
→unusual intestinal microbial species
and diversity of microbial species↓
 Commensal bacteria evoke excessive
inflammation in fetal enterocyte
(related to IkB↓)
Unaffected
preterm
baby
Infants who
developed
NEC
Infants who
before or
during NEC
Excessive
immature
inflammatory
response
Abnormal
intestinal
microbiota
NEC
HYPOXIA-ISCHEMIA Downstream role in NEC
 Modulation of microvascular tone
imbalance
 Vascular regulators :
1.nitric oxide
2.endothelin
OTHER CONTRIBUTING
FACTORS Blood transfusion
 The way to blood transfusion
→ hypoxia-ischemia problem
 Not association with pathogenesis of
NEC
 Use of umbilical catheters
 Parental nutrition via an umbilical-
artery catheter
PREVENTIVE APPROACHES
MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of
efficacy and safety
Evidence of
efficacy but
questionable
safety
Evidenced of efficacy
in animals models
but not in humans
Proposed efficacy
but lacking
evidence
Breast-milk feeding
Enteral
aminoglycosides
Anti-cytokines
Prebiotics (derived
from plants and
breast milk)
Probiotics
Microbial
components and
TLR agonists
Nonaggressive
enteral feeding
Glucocorticoids
Growth factors
Glutamine, n-3
fatty acidsArginine
ENTERAL FEEDING After withholding enteral feeding, rapid
increase in feeding cause NEC↑
 Complete withholding of feeding is
dangerous practice
 Prolonged use of parenteral nutrition
 Intestinal atrophy
 Permeability and inflammation↑
 Late-onset sepsis↑
→Delay feeding increases NEC
severity
ENTERAL FEEDING Provide enteral feeding of mother’s
expressed breast milk to prevent NEC
 Human milk + human milk-derived fortifier
→ low incidence of NEC
MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of
efficacy and safety
Evidence of
efficacy but
questionable
safety
Evidenced of efficacy
in animals models
but not in humans
Proposed efficacy
but lacking
evidence
Breast-milk feeding
Enteral
aminoglycosides
Anti-cytokines
Prebiotics (derived
from plants and
breast milk)
Probiotics
Microbial
components and
TLR agonists
Nonaggressive
enteral feeding
Glucocorticoids
Growth factors
Glutamine, n-3
fatty acidsArginine
ENTERAL AMINOGLYCOSIDES May be efficacy but NICU avoid the
practice
→ resistant microorganisms often emerge
 Empirical use of IV antibiotics
→ NEC incidence increased
PROBIOTICS NEC incidence↓
 Mortality of NEC did not decreased
 Incidence of sepsis ↑
 Birth weight < 750g
 Commentary suggesting the routine use
of probiotics, but FDA hasn’t approved
in preterm baby
 Not rigorous manufacturing quality
control of probiotics
MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of
efficacy and safety
Evidence of
efficacy but
questionable
safety
Evidenced of efficacy
in animals models
but not in humans
Proposed efficacy
but lacking
evidence
Breast-milk feeding
Enteral
aminoglycosides
Anti-cytokines
Prebiotics (derived
from plants and
breast milk)
Probiotics
Microbial
components and
TLR agonists
Nonaggressive
enteral feeding
Glucocorticoids
Growth factors
Glutamine, n-3
fatty acidsArginine
PREBIOTICS Can enhance growth of potential beneficial
intestinal microbes
 Include oligosaccharides inulin, galactose,
fructose, lactulose, and combinations
 Functions
 Alter consistency and frequency of stools
 Enhance proliferation of endogenous flora
→Bifidobacteria (lack in very-low-birth-
weight preterm infants)
 Prevention of NEC is unclear!
MICROBIAL COMPONENTS THAT
MODULATE INFLAMMATION
 Dead microbes are also effective in
modulating excessive inflammatory stimuli
 Mouse model studies about IRAK-1
 Intestinal epi. has high lipopolysaccharide
reactivity in the fetus, and decreased
through vaginal birth
 If delivered by CS, IRAK-1 expression is
not decreased, which continue to respond to
lipopolysaccharide →intestinal
inflammation and injury↑
MICROBIAL COMPONENTS THAT
MODULATE INFLAMMATION
 Expression of TLR-4 is the pathogenesis of
NEC!
 Preterm infants with NEC have higher
TLR4 than full-term infants
 TLR4 expression increases NEC and
intestinal inflammation
 Location of TLR4 on the surface of intestine
may limit activation by colonizing bacteria
 Alter the accessibility of colonizing bacteria
to TLRs can be therapeutic potential
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS Develop effective preventive strategist
→ Clear diagnostic criteria
 Establishing and applying strategies
→ Sensitive specific biomarkers and new
techniques for detecting factors

More Related Content

What's hot

necrotising enterocolitis
necrotising enterocolitisnecrotising enterocolitis
necrotising enterocolitisAravind A
 
Schanler nec feb 2010 handout
Schanler nec feb 2010 handoutSchanler nec feb 2010 handout
Schanler nec feb 2010 handoutOsama Arafa
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisS. Ismat
 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature Babies
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature BabiesNecrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature Babies
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature BabiesKyle Larson
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisAfnan Shamraiz
 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Necrotizing EnterocolitisNecrotizing Enterocolitis
Necrotizing EnterocolitisMohammed Fawzy
 
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)Sid Kaithakkoden
 
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITISNECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITISlingampelli
 
NEC اشرف حامدi
NEC  اشرف حامدiNEC  اشرف حامدi
NEC اشرف حامدiAshraf Hamed
 
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis Rasha AL-qadi
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisMohamed Fazly
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisBrian Shiluli
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findings
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findingsNecrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findings
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findingsMaria Cucos
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newbornsNecrotizing enterocolitis in newborns
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newbornsDr Praman Kushwah
 
小腸移植的現況與介紹
小腸移植的現況與介紹小腸移植的現況與介紹
小腸移植的現況與介紹Fanny Yeh
 
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing EnterocolitisNeonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitissumona keya
 
Board review abdomen 9.4.13
Board review abdomen 9.4.13Board review abdomen 9.4.13
Board review abdomen 9.4.13Nikita Joshi
 
Liver abscess in children
Liver abscess in childrenLiver abscess in children
Liver abscess in childrenJoyce Mwatonoka
 

What's hot (20)

necrotising enterocolitis
necrotising enterocolitisnecrotising enterocolitis
necrotising enterocolitis
 
Nec
NecNec
Nec
 
Schanler nec feb 2010 handout
Schanler nec feb 2010 handoutSchanler nec feb 2010 handout
Schanler nec feb 2010 handout
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature Babies
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature BabiesNecrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature Babies
Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in Premature Babies
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Necrotizing EnterocolitisNecrotizing Enterocolitis
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
 
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotising Enterocolitis(NEC)
 
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITISNECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS
 
NEC اشرف حامدi
NEC  اشرف حامدiNEC  اشرف حامدi
NEC اشرف حامدi
 
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis
 
NEC in newborn
NEC in newbornNEC in newborn
NEC in newborn
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitisNecrotizing enterocolitis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findings
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findingsNecrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findings
Necrotizing enterocolitis - imaging findings
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newbornsNecrotizing enterocolitis in newborns
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns
 
小腸移植的現況與介紹
小腸移植的現況與介紹小腸移植的現況與介紹
小腸移植的現況與介紹
 
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing EnterocolitisNeonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
 
Board review abdomen 9.4.13
Board review abdomen 9.4.13Board review abdomen 9.4.13
Board review abdomen 9.4.13
 
Liver abscess in children
Liver abscess in childrenLiver abscess in children
Liver abscess in children
 

Similar to 新生兒壞死性腸炎

Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing EnterocolitisNeonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitissumona keya
 
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case StudyIrritable Bowel Syndrome Case Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case StudyDana Boo
 
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitishomeworkping4
 
0. Classification of Newborn.pptx
0. Classification of Newborn.pptx0. Classification of Newborn.pptx
0. Classification of Newborn.pptxFenembarMekonnen
 
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June Cases
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June CasesDrs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June Cases
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June CasesSean M. Fox
 
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”Cystinosis: An “eye opener”
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”Apollo Hospitals
 
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatology
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatologyKastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatology
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatologyMOHAMMAD QUAYYUM
 
case presentation on Intestinal perforation
case presentation on Intestinal perforation case presentation on Intestinal perforation
case presentation on Intestinal perforation NEHA MALIK
 
Annotated Bibliography-Cholecystitis
Annotated Bibliography-CholecystitisAnnotated Bibliography-Cholecystitis
Annotated Bibliography-CholecystitisJessica Hall
 
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptx
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptxAnorectal_malformations_(1).pptx
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptxSubbareddy960924
 
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussion
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussionChronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussion
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussionDr Abdalla M. Gamal
 

Similar to 新生兒壞死性腸炎 (20)

Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing EnterocolitisNeonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
 
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case StudyIrritable Bowel Syndrome Case Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Case Study
 
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis
88887820 a-case-study-on-acute-appendicitis
 
History And Physical
History And PhysicalHistory And Physical
History And Physical
 
ACMCR-v10-1929.pdf
ACMCR-v10-1929.pdfACMCR-v10-1929.pdf
ACMCR-v10-1929.pdf
 
0. Classification of Newborn.pptx
0. Classification of Newborn.pptx0. Classification of Newborn.pptx
0. Classification of Newborn.pptx
 
Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Why Such Enigma?
Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Why Such Enigma?Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Why Such Enigma?
Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Why Such Enigma?
 
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June Cases
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June CasesDrs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June Cases
Drs. Rossi and Shreve’s CMC Abdominal Imaging Mastery Project: June Cases
 
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”Cystinosis: An “eye opener”
Cystinosis: An “eye opener”
 
Kelley sgp
Kelley sgpKelley sgp
Kelley sgp
 
Appendicitis
AppendicitisAppendicitis
Appendicitis
 
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatology
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatologyKastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatology
Kastenberg 2013 clinics-in-perinatology
 
case presentation on Intestinal perforation
case presentation on Intestinal perforation case presentation on Intestinal perforation
case presentation on Intestinal perforation
 
Annotated Bibliography-Cholecystitis
Annotated Bibliography-CholecystitisAnnotated Bibliography-Cholecystitis
Annotated Bibliography-Cholecystitis
 
Necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)Necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
Necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
 
Your Gut_pdf
Your Gut_pdfYour Gut_pdf
Your Gut_pdf
 
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptx
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptxAnorectal_malformations_(1).pptx
Anorectal_malformations_(1).pptx
 
NEC.ppt
NEC.pptNEC.ppt
NEC.ppt
 
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussion
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussionChronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussion
Chronic Liver Disease in pediatric: a case presentation and discussion
 
82094993 case-study
82094993 case-study82094993 case-study
82094993 case-study
 

More from Fanny Yeh

Disorder of tyrosine metabolism
Disorder of tyrosine metabolismDisorder of tyrosine metabolism
Disorder of tyrosine metabolismFanny Yeh
 
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病酪胺酸代謝異常疾病
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病Fanny Yeh
 
The experience of malone antegrade continence enema
The experience of malone antegrade continence enemaThe experience of malone antegrade continence enema
The experience of malone antegrade continence enemaFanny Yeh
 
Intestinal transplant
Intestinal transplantIntestinal transplant
Intestinal transplantFanny Yeh
 
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children Fanny Yeh
 
04 retroperitoneal teratoma final
04 retroperitoneal teratoma final04 retroperitoneal teratoma final
04 retroperitoneal teratoma finalFanny Yeh
 
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplantFanny Yeh
 
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗Fanny Yeh
 
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplantWithdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplantFanny Yeh
 
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明Fanny Yeh
 
滑動式氣管成型術
滑動式氣管成型術滑動式氣管成型術
滑動式氣管成型術Fanny Yeh
 
抗體在器官移植的應用
抗體在器官移植的應用抗體在器官移植的應用
抗體在器官移植的應用Fanny Yeh
 
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析Fanny Yeh
 
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤Fanny Yeh
 
再次葛西氏手術之探討
再次葛西氏手術之探討再次葛西氏手術之探討
再次葛西氏手術之探討Fanny Yeh
 
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧Fanny Yeh
 

More from Fanny Yeh (16)

Disorder of tyrosine metabolism
Disorder of tyrosine metabolismDisorder of tyrosine metabolism
Disorder of tyrosine metabolism
 
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病酪胺酸代謝異常疾病
酪胺酸代謝異常疾病
 
The experience of malone antegrade continence enema
The experience of malone antegrade continence enemaThe experience of malone antegrade continence enema
The experience of malone antegrade continence enema
 
Intestinal transplant
Intestinal transplantIntestinal transplant
Intestinal transplant
 
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children
Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children
 
04 retroperitoneal teratoma final
04 retroperitoneal teratoma final04 retroperitoneal teratoma final
04 retroperitoneal teratoma final
 
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
02 withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
 
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗
臺北榮總Malone灌腸造口手術後經驗
 
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplantWithdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
Withdrawal of immunosuppressants in pediatric liver transplant
 
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明
臺北榮總兒童外科兒童常見疾病說明
 
滑動式氣管成型術
滑動式氣管成型術滑動式氣管成型術
滑動式氣管成型術
 
抗體在器官移植的應用
抗體在器官移植的應用抗體在器官移植的應用
抗體在器官移植的應用
 
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析
肝母細胞癌外科治療結果—臺北榮總兒童外科自1996的分析
 
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤
在嬰兒後腹腔發現的巨大畸胎瘤
 
再次葛西氏手術之探討
再次葛西氏手術之探討再次葛西氏手術之探討
再次葛西氏手術之探討
 
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧
長段食道閉鎖手術治療方式之回顧
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night EnjoyCall Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoybabeytanya
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Servicevidya singh
 
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls JaipurCall Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipurparulsinha
 
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore EscortsVIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escortsaditipandeya
 
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...indiancallgirl4rent
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...CALL GIRLS
 
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...narwatsonia7
 
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Dipal Arora
 
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalore Esc...
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalore Esc...Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalore Esc...
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalore Esc...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...Taniya Sharma
 
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.MiadAlsulami
 
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service CoimbatoreCall Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatorenarwatsonia7
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...hotbabesbook
 
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...astropune
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night EnjoyCall Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
Call Girl Number in Panvel Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
 
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Varanasi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls JaipurCall Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
Call Girls Service Jaipur Grishma WhatsApp ❤8445551418 VIP Call Girls Jaipur
 
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Nagpur Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore EscortsVIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋  9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
VIP Call Girls Indore Kirti 💚😋 9256729539 🚀 Indore Escorts
 
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...
(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 9521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON De...
 
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
Call Girls Service Surat Samaira ❤️🍑 8250192130 👄 Independent Escort Service ...
 
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Coimbatore Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Russian Call Girls in Delhi Tanvi ➡️ 9711199012 💋📞 Independent Escort Service...
Russian Call Girls in Delhi Tanvi ➡️ 9711199012 💋📞 Independent Escort Service...Russian Call Girls in Delhi Tanvi ➡️ 9711199012 💋📞 Independent Escort Service...
Russian Call Girls in Delhi Tanvi ➡️ 9711199012 💋📞 Independent Escort Service...
 
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalor...
Bangalore Call Girls Hebbal Kempapura Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalor...
 
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...
VIP Call Girls Tirunelveli Aaradhya 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Tir...
 
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Bhubaneswar Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalore Esc...
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalore Esc...Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870  Meetin With Bangalore Esc...
Bangalore Call Girls Nelamangala Number 7001035870 Meetin With Bangalore Esc...
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
 
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
Artifacts in Nuclear Medicine with Identifying and resolving artifacts.
 
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service CoimbatoreCall Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️  8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
Call Girl Coimbatore Prisha☎️ 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Coimbatore
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
 
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
Best Rate (Hyderabad) Call Girls Jahanuma ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ High Class Call Girl...
 

新生兒壞死性腸炎

  • 3. PATIENT BASIC DATA  Name :林○彤  Gender: F, twin A  GA: 25+3 weeks , BBW: 438g via C/S  Chart number: 42692740  Admission date: 2015/10/22~ now
  • 4. AFTER BIRTH…  Extremely prematurity  Poor crying and activity  severe substernal, intercostal retraction were noted  Admitted for further evaluation & treatment
  • 5. HOSPITAL COURSE 10/23~10/31 brain echo: Bilateral IVH progression to Gr.II~III(10/25) Cardiac echo(10/26): PDA, L->R shunt (10/31): PDA closing NPO from birth, 母乳塗嘴Q4H (10/27) D5W 24ml/day + 1/2NS 12ml/day + Albumin ~90 ml/kg/day  TPN+1/2NS+Drug ~ 150 ml/kg/day Soft abdomen
  • 6. HOSPITAL COURSE  10/29 Try 1cc Q4H,  Pulmonary hemorrahge(10/29)  10/30 SSC-20 1cc Q6H->Q3H
  • 7. HOSPITAL COURSE  11/01~11/07  SSC-20 1cc Q3H->2cc q4h->3cc q3h ->4cc q3h  11/03 Hypoglycemia, cause unknown (endocrine? NTG side effect?)
  • 8. HOSPITAL COURSE  11/08~11/15  [Nutrition] 6cc q3h daily 85mlBM+F SSC-24 8cc q3h (11/13)  Staphylococcus capitis bacteremia s/p Teicoplanin (11/10-)+ meropenem(11/10- 11/12)  frequent desaturation noted->CXR 11/10 infiltration
  • 9. HOSPITAL COURSE  11/16~11/23  11/18 Occational desaturation and bradycardia noted: HR:88  [Nutrition] BM+F SSC-24 12cc q3h -> 13cc q3h
  • 10. HOSPITAL COURSE  11/25  Fever up to 38c noted in the afternoonCRP=6.59  Acidosis (pH 7.216, PaCO2 53.9, HCO3 22)noted.  11/26  Blood and mucinous stool noted in the afternoon  Abdominal distention  Suspect NEC-->Start NPO, TPN support
  • 11. 11/22
  • 12.  Antibiotics: Meropenem (B/C: pseudomonas A)  11/27  Mucus and blood-tingled stool was noted  KUB: dilated bowelNEC IIa  11/30  Abdominal distention persisted .  Stool: dark brown, muscus decrease  Anal tube insertion
  • 14.  12/02  Abdominal distention progressed, especially right upper quadrate, mild dark skin color, no heat sensation or pulsation noted  no stool passage note  Bedside sono: showed a 2x2 mass noted at RUQ, intussusception is less likely  consult PEDS doctor
  • 15. Try OG feeding 2c.c. water-soluable contrast follow up KUB tomorrow afternoon 12/03 Prescribed oral contrast in the morning KUB at 12/3 4 pm: some oral contrast still in stomach and intestinal KUB on 12/4 morning: no contrast in stomach and much improve than previous KUB
  • 16. 12/03
  • 20.
  • 21. 期刊討論  Introduction  Differential Diagnosis  Current Treatment Strategies  Pathogenesis  Preventive approaches  Future considerations
  • 23.  Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and devastating disease among neonates and has become a priority for research because it’s difficult to eradicate.  It was first described before 1960, but the entity was not recognized until after the advent of modern neonatal intensive care.  Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and mortality have remained unchanged because of ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
  • 24.  Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and devastating disease among neonates and has become a priority for research because it’s difficult to eradicate.  It was first described before 1960, but the entity was not recognized until after the advent of modern neonatal intensive care.  Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and mortality have remained unchanged because of ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
  • 25.  Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and devastating disease among neonates and has become a priority for research because it’s difficult to eradicate.  It was first described before 1960, but the entity was not recognized until after the advent of modern neonatal intensive care.  Since that time, the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and the associated morbidity and mortality have remained unchanged because of ever-improving survival of the smallest infants.
  • 26.  The mean prevalence of the disorder is about 7% among infants with a birth weight between 500 and 1500 g.  The estimated rate of death associated with necrotizing enterocolitis ranges between 20 and 30%, with the highest rate among infants requiring surgery. On the basis of large, multicenter, neonatal network databases from the United States and Canada
  • 27.  The mean prevalence of the disorder is about 7% among infants with a birth weight between 500 and 1500 g.  The estimated rate of death associated with necrotizing enterocolitis ranges between 20 and 30%, with the highest rate among infants requiring surgery. On the basis of large, multicenter, neonatal network databases from the United States and Canada
  • 28.  The excessive inflammatory process initiated in the highly immunoreactive intestine in necrotizing enterocolitis extends the effects of the disease systemically, affecting distant organs such as the brain and placing affected infants at substantially increased risk for neurodevelopmental delays.  An infant recovering from necrotizing enterocolitis may have nearly a 25% chance of microcephaly and serious neurodevelopmental delays that will transcend concerns that pertain to the gastrointestinal tract.
  • 29.  The excessive inflammatory process initiated in the highly immunoreactive intestine in necrotizing enterocolitis extends the effects of the disease systemically, affecting distant organs such as the brain and placing affected infants at substantially increased risk for neurodevelopmental delays.  An infant recovering from necrotizing enterocolitis may have nearly a 25% chance of microcephaly and serious neurodevelopmental delays that will transcend concerns that pertain to the gastrointestinal tract.
  • 30.  The total annual estimated cost of caring for affected infants in the United States is between $500 million and $1 billion.  Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected preterm infants if surgery was required and more than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.  Bowel resection is the most severe complication and major cause of the short-bowel disease.  The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
  • 31.  The total annual estimated cost of caring for affected infants in the United States is between $500 million and $1 billion.  Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected preterm infants if surgery was required and more than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.  Bowel resection is the most severe complication and major cause of the short-bowel disease.  The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
  • 32.  The total annual estimated cost of caring for affected infants in the United States is between $500 million and $1 billion.  Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected preterm infants if surgery was required and more than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.  Bowel resection is the most severe complication and major cause of the short-bowel disease.  The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
  • 33.  The total annual estimated cost of caring for affected infants in the United States is between $500 million and $1 billion.  Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were hospitalized 60 days longer than unaffected preterm infants if surgery was required and more than 20 days longer if surgery was not necessary.  Bowel resection is the most severe complication and major cause of the short-bowel disease.  The total mean cost of care over a 5-year period for a child with the short-bowel syndrome has been estimated to be nearly $1.5 million.
  • 35.  However, the most typical initial signs and symptoms of “classic” necrotizing enterocolitis in a preterm infant include feeding intolerance, abdominal distention, and bloody stools after 8 to 10 days of age.  The pathognomonic findings on abdominal radiography are pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas, or both.
  • 36.
  • 37.  Early imaging signs that should raise the suspicion of necrotizing enterocolitis include dilated loops of bowel, a paucity of gas, and gas- filled loops of bowel that are unaltered on repeated examinations.  Extraluminal air (“free air”) outside the bowel is a sign of advanced necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • 38.  Symptoms may progress rapidly, often within hours, from subtle signs to abdominal discoloration, intestinal perforation, and peritonitis, leading to systemic hypotension that requires intensive medical support, surgical support, or both.
  • 39.  Because of the lack of clear delineation of what constitutes the diagnosis of classic NEC, the term “necrotizing enterocolitis” often reflects a spectrum of intestinal conditions that differ with respect to pathogenesis and the strategies required for prevention and treatment.  Three forms of neonatal intestinal injury occur most often: conditions primarily seen in term infants, spontaneous intestinal perforations, and classic necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • 40. CONDITIONS PRIMARILY SEEN IN TERM INFANTS  The disease usually occurs in the first week after birth, but it differs from that seen in preterm infants in that it is more often associated with other problems, such as maternal illicit drug use, intestinal anomalies (e.g., aganglionosis or atresias), congenital heart disease, and perinatal stress that may affect mesenteric blood flow.
  • 41. SPONTANEOUS INTESTINAL PERFORATIONS  Spontaneous intestinal perforation usually occurs in the first several days after birth and is not associated with enteral feeding.  This disorder is characterized by only minimal intestinal inflammation and necrosis, as evidenced by low levels of serum inflammatory cytokines.  It has been associated with the administration of indomethacin and with glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone or hydrocortisone.
  • 42. CLASSIC NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS  A systematic description of necrotizing enterocolitis, the staging system described by Bell et al., was first published in 1978 and subsequently refined.
  • 43.  Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings and may include feeding intolerance, mild abdominal distention, or both.  Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to detect on radiographs.  One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a perforated viscus, which may or may not be associated with intestinal necrosis and which could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal perforation or dissected air from the pleural cavity.
  • 44.  Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings and may include feeding intolerance, mild abdominal distention, or both.  Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to detect on radiographs.  One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a perforated viscus, which may or may not be associated with intestinal necrosis and which could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal perforation or dissected air from the pleural cavity.
  • 45.  Stage 1 criteria are highly nonspecific findings and may include feeding intolerance, mild abdominal distention, or both.  Stage 2 criteria are radiographic findings such as pneumatosis intestinalis, which may be hard to detect on radiographs.  One of the most important criteria for stage 3 is a perforated viscus, which may or may not be associated with intestinal necrosis and which could, in fact, be a spontaneous intestinal perforation or dissected air from the pleural cavity.
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
  • 50.
  • 51.  Another classification system used to define necrotizing enterocolitis more specifically is published in the Vermont Oxford Network Manual of Operations.  This manual describes clinical and radiographic findings, with one or more of each type of finding (clinical or radiographic) required to establish a diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • 52.  The clinical findings include bilious gastric aspirate or emesis, abdominal distention, and occult gross blood in the stool, with the absence of anal fissures.  The imaging findings include pneumatosis intestinalis, hepatobiliary gas, and pneumoperitoneum.
  • 53.  The clinical findings include bilious gastric aspirate or emesis, abdominal distention, and occult gross blood in the stool, with the absence of anal fissures.  The imaging findings include pneumatosis intestinalis, hepatobiliary gas, and pneumoperitoneum.
  • 54.  Both Bell staging and Vermont-Oxford diagnostic approach has similar shortcomings that severe necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery can develop in patients even though pneumatosis intestinalis or portal gas has not been detected on imaging.  These patients may only have abdominal distention, without intraluminal bowel gas, on presentation.  Thus, the ominous progression of the disease may be missed, with a failure to intervene early enough.
  • 55.  A more reliable staging approach that allows for aggressive preventive measures is needed, but it will probably require the development of biomarkers that accurately predict the full expression of necrotizing enterocolitis.
  • 57.  Almost all very-low-birth-weight infants have intermittent gastrointestinal symptoms that may cause concern, but most do not have necrotizing enterocolitis.  Definitive necrotizing enterocolitis may require medical or surgical management based on the clinical presentation.
  • 58.  Medical intervention typically includes abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad- spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous hyperalimentation.  Surgical interventions are generally required in patients with intestinal perforation or deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g., shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil count, or both).  Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement, exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
  • 59.  Medical intervention typically includes abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad- spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous hyperalimentation.  Surgical interventions are generally required in patients with intestinal perforation or deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g., shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil count, or both).  Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement, exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
  • 60.  Medical intervention typically includes abdominal decompression, bowel rest, broad- spectrum intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous hyperalimentation.  Surgical interventions are generally required in patients with intestinal perforation or deteriorating clinical or biochemical status (e.g., shock or a decreasing platelet count, neutrophil count, or both).  Surgicalprocedures may involve drain placement, exploratory laparotomy with resection of diseased bowel, and enterostomy with creation of a stoma.
  • 61. LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE  Two commonly used methods for treating advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation are laparotomy and primary peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.  Two large multicenter studies concluded that the type of procedure does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes.  The second study also showed that infants treated with peritoneal drainage very often required a subsequent laparotomy.  Further analysis of the latter study showed no immediate clinical status improvement when peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
  • 62. LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE  Two commonly used methods for treating advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation are laparotomy and primary peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.  Two large multicenter studies concluded that the type of procedure does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes.  The second study also showed that infants treated with peritoneal drainage very often required a subsequent laparotomy.  Further analysis of the latter study showed no immediate clinical status improvement when peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
  • 63. LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE  Two commonly used methods for treating advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation are laparotomy and primary peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.  Two large multicenter studies concluded that the type of procedure does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes.  The second study also showed that infants treated with peritoneal drainage very often required a subsequent laparotomy.  Further analysis of the latter study showed no immediate clinical status improvement when peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
  • 64. LAPAROTOMY VS PERITONEAL DRAINAGE  Two commonly used methods for treating advanced necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation are laparotomy and primary peritoneal drainage without laparotomy.  Two large multicenter studies concluded that the type of procedure does not influence survival or other clinically important early outcomes.  The second study also showed that infants treated with peritoneal drainage very often required a subsequent laparotomy.  Further analysis of the latter study showed no immediate clinical status improvement when peritoneal drainage was used for this purpose.
  • 65.  A systematic review of several studies suggested mortality was increased by more than 50% with peritoneal drainage as compared with laparotomy.  Follow-up examinations at 18 to 22 months in infants who had undergone surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis in the neonatal period showed a significantly reduced risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment among those who had undergone a laparotomy as compared with those who had undergone peritoneal drainage.
  • 66.  A systematic review of several studies suggested mortality was increased by more than 50% with peritoneal drainage as compared with laparotomy.  Follow-up examinations at 18 to 22 months in infants who had undergone surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis in the neonatal period showed a significantly reduced risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment among those who had undergone a laparotomy as compared with those who had undergone peritoneal drainage.
  • 67.  These studies indicate that once surgery is required, the outcome may be poor, a finding that underscores the need for effective prevention.
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 73.
  • 74. INTESTINAL IMMATURITY  Risk of intestinal injury in preterm baby  Immature motility, digestion, absorption, immune defenses, barrier function, circulatory regulation  Example: Gastric acid secretion limited H2 blockers NEC↑
  • 75. INTESTINAL IMMATURITY  Excessive inflammatory response  Preterm baby against luminal microbial stimuli ↑, and alter barrier in the intestine  TLR4↑, IkB and NF-kB↓ (fetus v.s. adult)  Cytokine , IL-8↑ necrosis and production of acute-phase protein in the gut↑  Enterocytes of preterm baby are not prepared for the excessive stimulation of initial postnatal colonization
  • 76. MICROBIAL COLONIZATION  Inappropriate microbial colonization  Preterm baby NEC occurs until 8-10 days post partum  Experiment: NEC do not occur in germ-free animals  NEC baby always has bacteremia and endotoxemia
  • 77. MICROBIAL COLONIZATION  Preliminary studies  Groups: →unusual intestinal microbial species and diversity of microbial species↓  Commensal bacteria evoke excessive inflammation in fetal enterocyte (related to IkB↓) Unaffected preterm baby Infants who developed NEC Infants who before or during NEC
  • 79. HYPOXIA-ISCHEMIA Downstream role in NEC  Modulation of microvascular tone imbalance  Vascular regulators : 1.nitric oxide 2.endothelin
  • 80. OTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTORS Blood transfusion  The way to blood transfusion → hypoxia-ischemia problem  Not association with pathogenesis of NEC  Use of umbilical catheters  Parental nutrition via an umbilical- artery catheter
  • 82. MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of efficacy and safety Evidence of efficacy but questionable safety Evidenced of efficacy in animals models but not in humans Proposed efficacy but lacking evidence Breast-milk feeding Enteral aminoglycosides Anti-cytokines Prebiotics (derived from plants and breast milk) Probiotics Microbial components and TLR agonists Nonaggressive enteral feeding Glucocorticoids Growth factors Glutamine, n-3 fatty acidsArginine
  • 83. ENTERAL FEEDING After withholding enteral feeding, rapid increase in feeding cause NEC↑  Complete withholding of feeding is dangerous practice  Prolonged use of parenteral nutrition  Intestinal atrophy  Permeability and inflammation↑  Late-onset sepsis↑ →Delay feeding increases NEC severity
  • 84. ENTERAL FEEDING Provide enteral feeding of mother’s expressed breast milk to prevent NEC  Human milk + human milk-derived fortifier → low incidence of NEC
  • 85. MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of efficacy and safety Evidence of efficacy but questionable safety Evidenced of efficacy in animals models but not in humans Proposed efficacy but lacking evidence Breast-milk feeding Enteral aminoglycosides Anti-cytokines Prebiotics (derived from plants and breast milk) Probiotics Microbial components and TLR agonists Nonaggressive enteral feeding Glucocorticoids Growth factors Glutamine, n-3 fatty acidsArginine
  • 86. ENTERAL AMINOGLYCOSIDES May be efficacy but NICU avoid the practice → resistant microorganisms often emerge  Empirical use of IV antibiotics → NEC incidence increased
  • 87. PROBIOTICS NEC incidence↓  Mortality of NEC did not decreased  Incidence of sepsis ↑  Birth weight < 750g  Commentary suggesting the routine use of probiotics, but FDA hasn’t approved in preterm baby  Not rigorous manufacturing quality control of probiotics
  • 88. MEASURES TO PREVENT NECEvidence of efficacy and safety Evidence of efficacy but questionable safety Evidenced of efficacy in animals models but not in humans Proposed efficacy but lacking evidence Breast-milk feeding Enteral aminoglycosides Anti-cytokines Prebiotics (derived from plants and breast milk) Probiotics Microbial components and TLR agonists Nonaggressive enteral feeding Glucocorticoids Growth factors Glutamine, n-3 fatty acidsArginine
  • 89. PREBIOTICS Can enhance growth of potential beneficial intestinal microbes  Include oligosaccharides inulin, galactose, fructose, lactulose, and combinations  Functions  Alter consistency and frequency of stools  Enhance proliferation of endogenous flora →Bifidobacteria (lack in very-low-birth- weight preterm infants)  Prevention of NEC is unclear!
  • 90. MICROBIAL COMPONENTS THAT MODULATE INFLAMMATION  Dead microbes are also effective in modulating excessive inflammatory stimuli  Mouse model studies about IRAK-1  Intestinal epi. has high lipopolysaccharide reactivity in the fetus, and decreased through vaginal birth  If delivered by CS, IRAK-1 expression is not decreased, which continue to respond to lipopolysaccharide →intestinal inflammation and injury↑
  • 91. MICROBIAL COMPONENTS THAT MODULATE INFLAMMATION  Expression of TLR-4 is the pathogenesis of NEC!  Preterm infants with NEC have higher TLR4 than full-term infants  TLR4 expression increases NEC and intestinal inflammation  Location of TLR4 on the surface of intestine may limit activation by colonizing bacteria  Alter the accessibility of colonizing bacteria to TLRs can be therapeutic potential
  • 93. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS Develop effective preventive strategist → Clear diagnostic criteria  Establishing and applying strategies → Sensitive specific biomarkers and new techniques for detecting factors