3. 嚴重慢性便秘的治療方式
大容積的灌腸
給予的方式
逆行性:limited by the patients ability to resist the
urge and the ability of the sphincter, thus only
clears the distal colon
順行性:從盲腸造口進行灌腸
Initially described in 1990 by Malone
More effective in evacuation of both sides of the colon
4. 灌腸造口手術有高成功率
High success rates (78-94%) have been reported
Basson S, Pediatr Surg Int 2014; Randall J, J Pediatr Surg 2014
However, more than 40% of patients discontinuing use of their ACE
after a median of 11 years in one study
Yardley ID, J Pediatr Surg 2009
Reason for discontinuation:
Successful resolution of symptoms
Disuse due to non-compliance or ineffectiveness
Predictor of poor outcome:
Underlying etiology: worse prognosis in idiopathic constipation or GI
dysmotility patients
Age at operation: younger patients (<5 y/o) may have decreased
compliance and more complications (controversial)
Basson S, Pediatr Surg Int 2014
5. 灌腸造口手術常見的併發症
在闌尾造口與皮膚相接處產生狹窄requiring surgical
revision (usually at or near the skin level) is the
most common complication
Randall J, J Pediatr Surg 2014
Other complications include: stomal granulation,
stomal leakage, stomal prolapse, local infection
and incisional hernia
6. 本院Malone式灌腸造口手術病例 (‘03-’16)
# Etiology
Age
at OP
Type of
OP
Known
Complications
F/U
period
Documented
improve
Current ACE Use
1 ARM 10 Malone nil 2 year yes n/a
2 Syringomyelia 21 Malone nil 12 years yes
No (symptoms
resolved)
3 ARM 20 Malone nil 1 year yes n/a
4 ARM 8 Malone Wound infection 12 years yes Yes
5 Spinal bifida 7 Malone Stomal stricture 1 year yes n/a
6 ARM 19 Monti Stomal stricture 7 years yes Yes
7 Spinal bifida 13 Malone Stomal stricture 11 years yes
No (rectal
irrigation)
8 Spinal bifida 12 Malone Stomal stricture 10 years yes
No (symptoms
resolved)
9 ARM 28 Monti Stomal stricture 9 years yes Yes
10
Sacral
meningocele
14 Malone nil 1 year yes No (not effective)
11 ARM 23 Malone nil 1 year yes Yes
n/a: not available for chart/telephone interview
7. Malone式灌腸造口之手術適應症
肛門直腸發育異常(無肛症)
High type, or low type s/p multiple
operations with severe to total
incontinence with constipation
神經性失禁
Severe constipation with total
incontinence
不適合手術:原發性便秘
8. 手術方式
仍有盲腸:Malone式
Non-reverse,in-situ appendicostomy
Cecal flap (seromuscular) wraping around appendix
Fashioning of stoma by V-shape skin flap or direct
anastomosis
盲腸已被切除:Monti式(以一段末端迴腸代替盲腸)
One segment of terminal ileum(about 40-60 cm from
ileocecalvalve) was used as conduit
Tapering of the conduit at anti-mesenteric side
術後5-7天開始進行灌腸
導管在術後兩個禮拜後移除
9. 手術之成果:灌腸的方式及頻率
病患 灌洗液 頻率 灌腸所需時間
2 Tap water 1/day 45 min
4 Saline + glycerin 2-3/week* 60 min
6 Tap water 1/day 50 min
7 Saline + glycerin 1/day 60 min
8 Saline + glycerin 1/day 60 min
9 Tap water 1/day 20 min
10 GB 1/day Variable
11 Saline 2/day 60 min
* The patient is completely clean if ACE is performed once daily, but
modified to 2-3/week due to lifestyle
10. 評估失禁的評分標準
St. Mark’s Hospital Incontinence Score
Item Never Rarely Sometimes Weekly Daily
Incontinence for solid 0 1 2 3 4
Incontinence for liquid 0 1 2 3 4
Incontinence for gas 0 1 2 3 4
Alteration in lifestyle 0 1 2 3 4
No Yes
Need to wear pad 0 2
Taking constipating medicine 0 2
Lack of ability to defer defecation
for 15 minutes
0 4
* Never: no episode in recent 4 weeks; rarely: 1 episode in recent 4
weeks; sometimes, > 1 episode in recent 4 weeks but not weekly
Vaizey CJ, Gut 1999
11. 術後大便失禁獲得中等程度的改善
St. Mark’s Hospital Incontinence Score
Patient Number Continence Score (0 – 24)
2 10
4 18
6 9
7 15
8 20
9 15
10
11 14
Median 15
* Worse performing items: incontinence of gas, need to wear pads,
lack of ability to defer defecation
12. 術後對於自我照顧以及生活品質的滿意度
Item #2 #4 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 Median
Confidence in
one’s ability to
manage the
irrigation
8 10 8 7 7 10 7 6 7.5
Confidence that
ACE will give
control to one’s
bowel
9 9 8 6 6 10 7 7 7.5
Confidence to go
to social event 8 9 10 8 6 10 7 6 8
Confidence to
undertake daily
activities
10 10 10 10 7 7 7 6 8.5
Confidence to
attend full-day
activities
7 10 8 10 6 8 7 6 7.5
Overall satisfaction
of life 8 10 8 8 8 6 8 6 8
Overall satisfaction
with the procedure 9 10 8 6 6 9 6 6 7
13. 停止使用灌腸造口的原因
(Patients #2, #7, #8, #10)
Patient #2 discontinued ACE 4 years after the
procedure because of resolution of symptoms
Patient #7 discontinued ACE 6 years after the
procedure because she felt that the effectiveness
decreased and shift to colonic hydrotherapy machine
at home to manage her bowel
Patient #8 discontinued ACE 2 years after the
procedure because she felt that the effectiveness
decreased. In addition, she regained continence
gradually over the next 4 years and is currently partially
continent without intervention
Patient #10 discontinued ACE 3 months after the
procedure because the time interval to rectal
emptying is highly variable (irrigant: GB only)
14. 特定病患滿意度較低的原因
(Patients #7, #8, # 11)
Patient #7: weekly incontinence for solid stool,
alteration of lifestyle and personal preference
of rectal irrigation with good result
Patient #8: weekly incontinence for solid stool
Patient #10: highly variable time interval to
rectal emptying (irrigant: GB only)
Patient #11: comorbidity of schizophrenia,
poor self-care, weak family support, totally
rely on caretaker to administer the irrigations