This document provides an overview of a presentation on risk management. It outlines the objectives of the presentation which are to provide a practical approach and tools to implement enterprise risk management. It discusses basic risk management concepts such as risks being uncertainties that can affect objectives, and the need to consider both threats and opportunities. It also presents a simple risk management framework of establishing objectives, identifying risks and controls, assessing risks, evaluating and taking action, and monitoring. The presentation aims to help participants start implementing risk management in their own organizations.

1. 1
A Practical Approach to
Risk Management
Financial Management Institute,
Toronto Chapter
February 17 2010
Corinne Berinstein, BPT, MBA, MHSC, CA, CFI
Health Audit Services Team
Ontario Internal Audit Division

2. 2
Contact Info:
Corinne Berinstein, BPT, MBA, MHSC, CA, CFI, Certificate in Risk
Management (Canadian Health Care Association
Senior Audit Manager
Health Audit Services Team
Ontario Internal Audit Division
Province of Ontario
Office: 416-327-7798
eMail: corinne.berinstein1@ontario.ca

3. 3
Basic Concepts

4. 4
 Objectives of today’s session
 Basic principles, concepts, definitions
 A simple framework
 Stocking your toolkit – education, job aids, templates
 What are you going to do back in the office?
 Q &A’s
 A case – Let’s practice!
Outline

5. 5
Objectives
 Give you a practical approach, framework and tools so
you can start implementing ERM when you get back to
the office.
 Share some lessons learned. Share some tips and tricks.
 Practice concepts and tools with a case study so that you
practice

6. 6
The only alternative to risk management is crisis management --- and
crisis management is much more expensive, time consuming and
embarrassing.
JAMES LAM, Enterprise Risk Management, Wiley Finance © 2003
Without good risk management practices, government cannot manage its
resources effectively. Risk management means more than preparing for
the worst; it also means taking advantage of opportunities to improve
services or lower costs.
Sheila Fraser, Auditor General of Canada
Why do we need Risk Management?

7. 7
Why bother with RM?
 Increase risk awareness – What could affect the
achievement of objectives? What could change? What
could go wrong? What could go right?
 Increase understanding of risk – sensitivities. What
makes my risks increase/decrease/disappear?
 Promote a “healthy” risk culture – It’s safe to talk about
risk. Open and transparent.
 Develop a common and consistent approach to risk across
the organization. Not intuition-based.

8. 8
Why bother with RM?
 Allows intelligent “informed” risk-taking.
 Focuses efforts –helps prioritize. Top 10 list. Or top 3.
Or…
 Is proactive…. not reactive – Prepare for risks before
they happen. Identify risks and develop appropriate risk
mitigating strategies.
 Improve outcomes – achievement of objectives
(corporate, clinical, etc)
 Really comes to down to simple good management
 Enables accountability, transparency and responsibility
 And maybe even mean survival

9. 9
A risk is ANYTHING that may affect the
achievement of an organization’s objectives.
It is the UNCERTAINTY that surrounds future
events and outcomes.
It is the expression of the likelihood and impact of
an event with the potential to influence the
achievement of an organization’s objectives.
Basic principles, concepts, definitions

10. 10
Threats and opportunities
Threat – a risk that may HINDER the achievement of objectives
Opportunities - a risk that may HELP in the achievement of objectives
 Interest rates
 Foreign exchange rates
 Supply of service/product/resources
 Demand/uptake for service/product/resources
 The economy
 The weather
 The stock market

11. 11
Interactive Session #1 – 10 minutes
 Introduce yourselves to others at your table
 Pick 1 risk – discuss it as both a threat and
an opportunity
 Report to the large group. Pick a
spokesperson.

12. 12
Definition of ERM
“… a process, effected by an entity's board of
directors, management and other personnel, applied
in strategy setting and across the enterprise,
designed to identify potential events that may affect
the entity, and manage risks to be within its risk
appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the achievement of entity objectives.”
Source: COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework. 2004.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)

13. 13
Enterprise vs Integrated Risk Management
Similarities:
 Formal process
 Consistent and systematic
 Includes projects, programs,
operations
 Is embedded in key processes
such as strategic planning,
budgeting, project planning,
evaluation, etc
 Must be driven and supported by
Leadership
 Adds value to decision-making
Differences:
Enterprise-wide:
 Is organizational-centric
Success is defined as
implementation over the entire
organization
Integrated:
Take a systems-focus
May actually create risks for
individual organizations

14. 14
Periodic Summary Analysis & Report
Enterprise Risk Management
Periodic Summary Analysis & Report
Division
Level
Branch
Level
Unit or
Project
Level

15. 15
Periodic Summary Analysis & Report
Integrated Risk Management
Periodic Summary Analysis & Report
System
Level
Regional
Level
Organiz-
ational
Level

16. 16Slide 16
Risk Management Basics
 Risk (uncertainty) may affect the achievement of
objectives.
 Effective mitigation strategies/controls can reduce
negative risks or increase opportunities.
 Residual risk is the level of risk after evaluating the
effectiveness of controls.
 Acceptance and action should be based on residual risk
levels.
INHEREN
T

17. 17
A Simple Framework
Evaluate
& Take
Action
Evaluate
& Take
Action
Establish
Objectives
Establish
Objectives
Identify
Risks &
Controls
Identify
Risks &
Controls
Assess
Risks &
Controls
Assess
Risks &
Controls
Monitor
& Report
Monitor
& Report
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Communicate, learn, improve

18. 18
Risk Management is critical to ALL levels of decisions
Decisions can be categorized into three types. The amount of risk
(uncertainty) varies with the type of decisions. Most decisions are
concerned with implementation.
The HM Treasury’s The Orange Book

19. 19
The relationship between IRM & MOHLTC’s Complex Risk
Environment

20. 20Slide 20
Categorizing Risk – Comprehensive
1. Political or Reputational Risk
2. Financial Risk
3. Service Delivery or Operational Risk
4. People / HR Risk
5. Information/Knowledge Risk
6. Strategic / Policy Risk
7. Stakeholder Satisfaction / Public Perception Risk
8. Legal / Compliance Risk
9. Technology Risk
10. Governance / Organizational Risk
11. Privacy Risk
12. Security Risk
13. Equity Risk
14. Patient Safety
NEW

21. 21Slide 21
Risk Prioritization – likelihood and impact
Likelihood of a risk event occurring
 Very High: Is almost certain to occur
 High: Is likely to occur
 Medium: Is as likely as not to occur
 Low: May occur occasionally
 Very Low: Unlikely to occur
Risk Impact: Level of damage that
can occur when a risk event
occurs
 Very High: Threatens the success of
the project
 High: Substantial impact on time, cost
or quality
 Medium: Notable impact on time,
cost or quality
 Low: Minor impact on time, cost or
quality
 Very Low: Negligible impact

22. 22
Third dimension for rating risks - proximity
 Immediate – now
 Less than 6 months
 Between 6-12 months
 Between 12 – 24 months
 Between 24 – 36 months
 More than 36 months

23. 23Slide 23
Risk rating
…Combining impact and likelihood

24. 24
Risk Level Action and Level of Involvement Required
Critical Risk
• Inform Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors
• Immediate action required
High Risk
• Inform Chief Executive Officer
• Strategy Team involvement/attention is essential to manage risks
– provide report to Board as appropriate
Moderate Risk
• Management mitigation and ongoing monitoring required
• Inform relevant Strategy Team members
Low Risk
• Accept, but monitor risks
• Manage by routine procedures within the program and site
Risk reporting and communications

25. 25

26. 26
Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) are linked to
strategy, performance and risk
Risk
Consequence
Strategy & objectives
Cause
KRI
KRIs need to be linked to strategy, objectives and target performance
levels, with a good understanding of the drivers to risk.
Performance

27. 27
EXAMPLES OF KRIs
Human resource
• Average time to fill vacant
positions
• Staff absenteeism /sickness
rates
• Percentage of staff appraisals
below “satisfactory”
Age demographics of key
managers
Information Technology
• Systems usage versus
capacity
• Number of system upgrades/
version releases
• Number of help desk calls
Finance
• Daily P&L adjustments (#,
amt)
• Reporting deadlines missed
(#)
• Incomplete P&L sign-offs (#,
aged)
Legal/compliance
• Outstanding litigation cases
(#, amt)
• Compliance investigations (#)
• Customer complaints (#)
Audit
• Outstanding high risk issues
(#, aged)
• Audit findings (#, severity)
• Revised management action
target dates (#)
Risk management
• Management overrides
• Limit breaches (#, amt)

28. 28
Measure and report RM implementation progress
Excellent
• Advanced capabilities to identify, measure, manage all risk exposures within
tolerances
• Advanced implementation, development and execution of ERM parameters
• Consistently optimizes risk adjusted returns throughout the organization
Strong
• Clear vision of risk tolerance and overall risk profile
• Risk control exceeds adequate for most major risks
• Has robust processes to identify and prepare for emerging risks
• Incorporates risk management and decision making to optimize risk adjusted
returns
Adequate
• Has fully functioning control systems in place for all of their major risks
• May lack a robust process for identifying and preparing for emerging risks
• Performing good classical “silo” based risk management
• Not fully developed process to optimize risk adjusted returns
Weak
• Incomplete control process for one or more major risks
• Inconsistent or limited capabilities to identify, measure or manage major risk
exposures
Source: Standard & Poor

29. 29
Progress to Date – ERM Report Card
Quality of Care and Patient SafetyQuality of Care and Patient Safety
Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance
Operation & Business SupportOperation & Business Support
Reputation and Public ImageReputation and Public Image
Human Resources and Staff RelationsHuman Resources and Staff Relations
Financial ResourcesFinancial Resources
Information Systems and TechnologyInformation Systems and Technology
Physical AssetsPhysical Assets
Legal and RegulatoryLegal and Regulatory
Environmental Health and SafetyEnvironmental Health and Safety
PoliciesPolicies
StandardsStandards

30. 30
An Approach to Risk Management
 Establish centralized support
 Develop a standardized framework
 Provide education and coaching
 Ensure ministry-wide implementation
 Embed IRM into all major processes including strategic
planning and resource allocations decisions
 Enable our stewardship role

31. 31
The Approach
 Incorporates risk information into the strategic direction-
setting, making decisions that consider established risk
tolerance levels.
 Takes a systems approach to managing risk at the
strategic, operational and project levels which is
continuous, proactive and systematic.
 Fosters a working culture that values learning, innovation,
responsible risk-taking and continuous improvement.

32. 32
 We wanted to add value not work. We developed forms
and templates.
 So we developed and delivered educational sessions –
usually attended by all team members. Included risk 101
and then time for the team members to discuss how to
apply concepts to their work.
 We assisted teams in actual risk assessments. Sometimes
we used voting software.
 We trained the trainer.
Your toolkit – education, job aids, templates

33. 33
A Process for Embedding IRM
HAST Sessions Components Participant Outcomes
Risk 101
Presentation
Introduction – Integrated Risk Management
Introduction to basic risk concepts and terminologies
Introduction to the MOHLTC’s Integrated Risk
Framework
Status of IRM in MOHLTC
(Most effective when followed-up with facilitated risk
assessment workshop or application to actual project)
Understanding of risk management process
Understanding of how risk management is relevant to their day-to-day
work
Knowledge of IRM in MOHLTC
Management IRM
Planning Meeting
Planning
Discuss best way to implementation IRM in area
Proposed IRM implementation plan presented for area
Clarify roles & responsibilities for risk management
Commitment to IRM implementation in area or stream of work
Risk management roles and responsibilities clearly defined
Review of IRM roll-out; timelines , deliverables, related forums
Commitment to continuous risk communication & learning
Risk Assessment
Workshop
Facilitated Training – Identification of risks &
mitigation strategies
Identification of objectives
Brainstorming and identification of risks to meeting
objectives (for project, branch, initiative, etc. )
Identification of source, mitigation strategies, ownership
and residual risk for each ‘risk category’
Hands-on experience allowing assimilation of consistent risk
management techniques
Hands-on practice of IRM process, enabling application of risk
management principles and tools to work
Greater understanding of work and inter-dependencies
Risk Prioritization
& Voting
Workshop
Facilitated Training – Assessment of mitigation
strategies & prioritization
Review of risks, mitigation strategies and ownership
Anonymous voting on the impact and probability of each
risk
Prioritization of risks on ‘heat map’
Discussion of mitigation strategies for high priority risks
Review of risks, mitigation strategies, ownership, residual risk to their
work in a seamless manner
Unbiased risk prioritization and identification of high risks
Enables application of complete risk management process to every day
work
Risk follow-up
Session
Monitoring & Review
Review of risks six months after initial assessment
Review mitigation strategies and residual risks
Review of risks and status
Continuous improvement

34. 34
The following table describes the risks and mitigating controls and related information. As controls are implemented or changed, their status will be updated.
Risk Rating Impact = significant, moderate or minor (S, M, m) and Likelihood = high, medium or low (H, M, or L)
ID Number
Responsible Org &
Name (Implement /
Operate) Risk Control
Risk
Rating
(Impact)
Risk
Rating
(likelihood) Date Required Status
Category: Financial
Category: Equity
Category: Service Delivery or Operational
064 Person A 055 – Insufficient knowledge transfer
102 – Conflicting management
instructions
Update impacted policies and procedures
for integration into knowledge support tools.
Harmonizing policies and procedures (e.g.,
access procedures – X has one and Y has
one – there needs to be one
process/policy/procedure).
M M 31-Mar-09 Refer to Privacy
Action Plan Work on
Ongoing Operations
Commitments
Report
065 Person B 056 – Lack of communication (Serious
service delivery issues)
352 – Different business and IT
processes (incident management)
(a) IT incident and Triage (harmonization
between IT and Business).
(b) X and Y need to develop an incident
management process/service to deal with
issues that arise during service delivery.
Roles and responsibilities need to be
defined in both organizations: from a
stewardship perspective on the ministry
side, and from a service delivery/reporting
perspective on the agency side. The
process/service ensures that incident/issues
are communicated as per agreement
requirements; well tracked and reported.
M M 31-Mar-09 (a, b) Refer to
ongoing Operations
IRM document
IRM RISKS AND CONTROLS
None in this category
None in this category

35. 35

36. 36

37. 37

38. 38
The Cyclist and the Risk Manager

39. 39
Interactive Session #2 – 15 minutes
 Identify risks that the cyclists faces in
cycling to work.
 Report back.

40. 40
Risk Factors – the cyclist
.

41. 41
Risk Factors – the weather, the road, visibility, the
bike, the lock
.

42. 42
Risk Factors – the driver
.

43. 43
Risks
Threats:
 Death
 Head Injury
 Injury
 Reputation
 Financial
 Damage to the bike
 Sunburn/frost bite
Opportunities:
 Exercise
 Sunlight
 Reputation
 Financial
 Role model
 Environment

44. 44
Mitigation Strategies for threats
 Death, head injury, other injury – helmet, bright clothes, lights, bell,
CANbike course, obeying traffic laws, positive attitude, anger
management course
 Reputation – great outfit, change of wrinkle-free clothes, shower,
time management
 Financial – high quality locks, “beater”, stopping at stop signs
 Damage to the bike – regular maintenance, avoiding pot holes
 Sunburn/frost bite – sunscreen, mittens, hats, token/change
 Dehydration- filled water bottle

45. 45
ERM/IRM can be complex and messy

46. 46
Keep it simple

47. 47
Back at the office
 Why is the organization interested in RM? What are they hoping
will be achieved with its implementation?
 Who is doing what? Roles & responsibilities must be clearly
defined. Make sure Leadership supports RM and uses RM results to
make decisions. Everyone is a risk manager. Make sure that all risks
have owners and the responsibilities for mitigation are assigned
 How will it be implemented? What is your framework? What is the
common language? How will risks be measured and reported?
 Where will you start? Choices could be where you can most easily
succeed or where it is needed the most or where interest is high.
 When will it be implemented? It is a journey not a destination; 3-5
years for complete roll-out; how often will risks be assessed; when
will mitigation plans be implemented and monitored; when will risks
be reported.

48. 48
Ask questions and develop your approach
 Do we understand our major risks? Do we know what is causing our
risks to increase, decrease or stay the same?
 Have we assessed the likelihood and impact of our risks?
 Have we identified the sources and causes of our risks?
 How well are we managing our risks?
 Are we trying to prevent the downside risks from happening? Or are
we trying to simply recover from them?
 Who is accountable for these risks?
 How do we talk about risk? Do we have a common language across
branches, across divisions, across the ministry, across the OPS,
across the health care system?
 Are we taking too much risk? Or not enough risk?
 Are the right people taking the right risks at the right time?
 What’s our culture? Are we risk adverse or are we risk-takers? Or are
we somewhere in between?

49. 49
TAKE SMALL BITES………. IRM IMPLEMENTATION

50. 50
Questions?

51. 51
 Case 1 – The Pan Am Games 2015
 Case 2 – The provincial response to the next Pandemic
 Case 3 – The extension of Hwy 404
 Case 4 – The rescue efforts in Haiti
 Case 5 – Human Resources in the Ontario Public Services
 Case 6 – A big teaching hospital in Toronto
The case - You are responsible for Risk Management
for:

52. 52
 Consider the 13 categories of risk
 Identify top 5 threats (downside) and top 5opportunities (upside)
 Propose mitigation strategies
 Discuss how the following risk factors would affect your assessment:
 Economy
 Demographics
 Weather
 Technology
 Timing of events such an election
 Others
The case

53. 53
Questions?