0 Congestive Heart Failure Rogert Castro South University Online Evidence Table Worksheet I. PICOT Question: Does an effective discharge plan (I) compared to routine care (C) influence Readmission rates (O) in patients, 65 years and older, who have been discharged after hospitalization with Congestive heart failure (P) over 30 days after discharge (T)? Plus 1. Will you have a comparison group, or will subjects be their own controls? Yes, there will be a comparison group. The study population will have personalized post-discharge outpatient follow-up appointments, while the control group will not have the usual care. 2. Is a ‘time’ appropriate with your question—why or why not? The allocated time is suitable for the study and will provide more time to follow up for patients after discharge. 0 II. Evidence Synthesis Database: PubMed (Parrinello et al., 2011) (Ryan et al., 2013) (Shao et al., 2013) (Lee et al., 2016) (Sharma et al., 2010) Synthesis (p) Population Comprised of 22 discharged CHF patients 398 patients from heart failure discharge The intervention group had 47 heart failure patients actively attending cardiac clinics. 11,985 eligible adults hospitalized for HF 62 746 COPD patients years old. All the studies comprised of a study population that was either hospitalized for HF or heart related conditions such as COPD. (i) Intervention Early and personalized congestion guided ambulatory program. 7-day follow-up visits. Self-management initiatives centered on the self-efficacy construct, in elderly patients with heart failure. The timing and type of post-discharge follow-up An early follow-up visit with the patient’s pulmonologist or primary care physician. From the studies, there are several intervention methods and approaches that have been studied by scientists capable of decreasing readmissions (c) Comparison (c) Comparison 21 subjects for the control group No control group The Control group had 46 patients that received the usual care 7,935 eligible controls. Usual care and no follow-up These are primary studies, and it is proper for them to have controls as part of the research design to lower the effects of variables. (o) Outcome. Improved clinical compensation, enhanced quality of life, and a decrease in readmissions A reduction in 30- day readmission rate. Significantly improved confidence for salt and fluid control, self-management behavior, and reduction in heart failure-related symptoms. Risks of readmission within 30 days after discharge. A reduction in readmissions and emergency department visits. Majority of the intervention measures taken significantly reduce readmission cases and risks for readmission. (t) time Six months of follow up visits. 30 days follow up visits. 12 weeks follow up visits. 30 days 30 days Each study had a proper time frame that allowed the studies to be completed and answer the clinical question III. Evaluation Table Citation Design Sample ...