Positivism, Social Ecology, and the Chicago SchoolCJS 380 Crime Science:Principles, Strategies and Practice ofCrime Prevention and ReductionJ.A. Gilmer
The positivists
Lombroso and the Innate CriminalItalian criminologistFounder or Positivist School of criminology“Born criminal” as atavist (evolutionary throwback) identified through physical stigmata1835-1919
Goddard – IQ and HeredityPsychologist, eugenicistFeeblemindedness caused criminality, an inherited traitIQ test used to “scientifically” validateAuthor of  The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-MindednessInfluenced immigration control policy of early 1920s1866-1957
The chicago school
The Chicago School (of Sociology)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_%28sociology%29Founded urban sociology 1914-1934Period of rapid expansion and social changeChicago Population Trends, 1870-1940
Durkheim – Social Change and AnomieFrench sociologistStudied evolution of societiesMechanical-organic continuumNorms – shared expectations of behaviorCollective conscience – shapes common identityAnomie – ‘normlessness’ due to rapid societal change 1858-1917
Robert E. Park and Natural AreasJournalist, sociologistPositivism & functionalsimThe City as natural areaSocial ecological/environmentalThe city is a state of mind, a body of customs and traditions, and of organized attitudes and sentiments that inhere in this tradition. The city is not, in other words, merely a physical mechanism and an artificial construction. It is involved in the vital processes of the people who compose it, it is a product of nature and particularly of human nature.http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/projects/centcat/centcats/fac/facch17_01.html1864-1944
Burgess and Concentric ZonesUrban sociologistCollaborated with ParkDeveloped concepts of urban Zones1886-1966
Shaw & McKay – DelinquencyShaw, Clifford R. & McKay, Henry D. (1942/1969).  Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas.Sociologists and founders of Chicago Area ProjectMapped addresses of male delinquentsExamined delinquency rate in different areasStudied relationship of nativity and other social and demographic characteristics to delinquency "Perhaps the results of the Project should not be measured by the rate of juvenile delinquency alone. The project has uncovered latent talent within the communities. Committees have improved parent-teacher relationships and shouldered responsibility for school attendance and improvement. They have brought to bear effective public opinion on specific contributors to juvenile delinquency. They have succeeded in leading children away from crime and reincorporating parolees in the neighborhood."http://www.chicagoareaproject.org/historical-look-chicago-area-project
Main Findings of Zone TheoryDelinquency rates decreased moving out from the center of the cityRelated to other ‘social pathologies’ – unemployment, poverty, poor health, mortality, broken familiesNeighborhood stability a key characteristicHome ownership (stake in the community)Ethnic turnover did not affect high rates  of delinquency in inner zone
Interpretation of Zone DynamicsOuter zones Shared values, norms, collective conscienceEngagement in conventional activitiesCommunity containment of devianceInnermost zonesExtreme diversity -> mixed messages Greater exposure to violence Weak community controls -> subcultural deviance thrives ->  crime“inability of a community structure to realize the common vslues of its residents and maintain effective social controls.”  Sampson and Groves (1989)
Critique of Social Disorganization Labelingpower to define conduct as delinquent or rationalize it awayEcological Fallacy“the danger of making assertions about individuals as the unit of analysis based on the examination of groups or other aggregations” (Maxfield and Babbie, 1995)Tautological (circular reasoning)Socially disorganized b/c high crime but high crime used to define socially disorganized area
Community-level Factors and CrimeLow socioeconomic status / relative deprivationHaving little? or having less than other?Ethnic heterogeneityRace consistently correlated with crime – why?Population DensityIncreased interactions and relative anonymityResidential instabilityImpact on family structure
Legacy of The chicago school
Collective Efficacy Hypothesis“social cohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good” (Sampson, et al., 1997)High mutual trust/shared valuesStrong social ties/social networkExpectation of interventionRobert J. Sampson
Elijah Anderson -- SociologistThis is because the street culture has evolved what may be called a code of the streets, which amounts to a set of informal rules governing interpersonal public behavior, including violence. The rules prescribe both a proper comportment and a proper way to respond if challenged. They regulate the use of violence and so allow those who are inclined to aggression to precipitate violent encounters in an approved way. The rules have been established and are enforced mainly by the street-oriented, but on the streets the distinction between street and decent is often irrelevant; everybody knows that if the rules are violated, there are penalties. Knowledge of the code is thus largely defensive; it is literally necessary for operating in public. Therefore, even though families with a decency orientation are usually opposed to the values of the code, they often reluctantly encourage their children's familiarity with it to enable them to negotiate the inner-city environment.Elijah Anderson

02 positivism social eco chicago school

  • 1.
    Positivism, Social Ecology,and the Chicago SchoolCJS 380 Crime Science:Principles, Strategies and Practice ofCrime Prevention and ReductionJ.A. Gilmer
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Lombroso and theInnate CriminalItalian criminologistFounder or Positivist School of criminology“Born criminal” as atavist (evolutionary throwback) identified through physical stigmata1835-1919
  • 4.
    Goddard – IQand HeredityPsychologist, eugenicistFeeblemindedness caused criminality, an inherited traitIQ test used to “scientifically” validateAuthor of The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-MindednessInfluenced immigration control policy of early 1920s1866-1957
  • 5.
  • 6.
    The Chicago School(of Sociology)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_%28sociology%29Founded urban sociology 1914-1934Period of rapid expansion and social changeChicago Population Trends, 1870-1940
  • 7.
    Durkheim – SocialChange and AnomieFrench sociologistStudied evolution of societiesMechanical-organic continuumNorms – shared expectations of behaviorCollective conscience – shapes common identityAnomie – ‘normlessness’ due to rapid societal change 1858-1917
  • 8.
    Robert E. Parkand Natural AreasJournalist, sociologistPositivism & functionalsimThe City as natural areaSocial ecological/environmentalThe city is a state of mind, a body of customs and traditions, and of organized attitudes and sentiments that inhere in this tradition. The city is not, in other words, merely a physical mechanism and an artificial construction. It is involved in the vital processes of the people who compose it, it is a product of nature and particularly of human nature.http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/projects/centcat/centcats/fac/facch17_01.html1864-1944
  • 9.
    Burgess and ConcentricZonesUrban sociologistCollaborated with ParkDeveloped concepts of urban Zones1886-1966
  • 10.
    Shaw & McKay– DelinquencyShaw, Clifford R. & McKay, Henry D. (1942/1969). Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas.Sociologists and founders of Chicago Area ProjectMapped addresses of male delinquentsExamined delinquency rate in different areasStudied relationship of nativity and other social and demographic characteristics to delinquency "Perhaps the results of the Project should not be measured by the rate of juvenile delinquency alone. The project has uncovered latent talent within the communities. Committees have improved parent-teacher relationships and shouldered responsibility for school attendance and improvement. They have brought to bear effective public opinion on specific contributors to juvenile delinquency. They have succeeded in leading children away from crime and reincorporating parolees in the neighborhood."http://www.chicagoareaproject.org/historical-look-chicago-area-project
  • 11.
    Main Findings ofZone TheoryDelinquency rates decreased moving out from the center of the cityRelated to other ‘social pathologies’ – unemployment, poverty, poor health, mortality, broken familiesNeighborhood stability a key characteristicHome ownership (stake in the community)Ethnic turnover did not affect high rates of delinquency in inner zone
  • 12.
    Interpretation of ZoneDynamicsOuter zones Shared values, norms, collective conscienceEngagement in conventional activitiesCommunity containment of devianceInnermost zonesExtreme diversity -> mixed messages Greater exposure to violence Weak community controls -> subcultural deviance thrives -> crime“inability of a community structure to realize the common vslues of its residents and maintain effective social controls.” Sampson and Groves (1989)
  • 13.
    Critique of SocialDisorganization Labelingpower to define conduct as delinquent or rationalize it awayEcological Fallacy“the danger of making assertions about individuals as the unit of analysis based on the examination of groups or other aggregations” (Maxfield and Babbie, 1995)Tautological (circular reasoning)Socially disorganized b/c high crime but high crime used to define socially disorganized area
  • 14.
    Community-level Factors andCrimeLow socioeconomic status / relative deprivationHaving little? or having less than other?Ethnic heterogeneityRace consistently correlated with crime – why?Population DensityIncreased interactions and relative anonymityResidential instabilityImpact on family structure
  • 15.
    Legacy of Thechicago school
  • 16.
    Collective Efficacy Hypothesis“socialcohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good” (Sampson, et al., 1997)High mutual trust/shared valuesStrong social ties/social networkExpectation of interventionRobert J. Sampson
  • 17.
    Elijah Anderson --SociologistThis is because the street culture has evolved what may be called a code of the streets, which amounts to a set of informal rules governing interpersonal public behavior, including violence. The rules prescribe both a proper comportment and a proper way to respond if challenged. They regulate the use of violence and so allow those who are inclined to aggression to precipitate violent encounters in an approved way. The rules have been established and are enforced mainly by the street-oriented, but on the streets the distinction between street and decent is often irrelevant; everybody knows that if the rules are violated, there are penalties. Knowledge of the code is thus largely defensive; it is literally necessary for operating in public. Therefore, even though families with a decency orientation are usually opposed to the values of the code, they often reluctantly encourage their children's familiarity with it to enable them to negotiate the inner-city environment.Elijah Anderson

Editor's Notes

  • #4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesare_Lombroso. Specific criminals, such as thieves, rapists, and murderers, could be distinguished by specific characteristics, he believed. Lombroso also maintained that criminals had less sensibility to pain and touch; more acute sight; a lack of moral sense, including an absence of remorse; more vanity, impulsiveness, vindictiveness, and cruelty; and other manifestations, such as a special criminal argot and the excessive use of tattooing.
  • #5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesare_Lombroso. Specific criminals, such as thieves, rapists, and murderers, could be distinguished by specific characteristics, he believed. Lombroso also maintained that criminals had less sensibility to pain and touch; more acute sight; a lack of moral sense, including an absence of remorse; more vanity, impulsiveness, vindictiveness, and cruelty; and other manifestations, such as a special criminal argot and the excessive use of tattooing.
  • #8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesare_Lombroso. Specific criminals, such as thieves, rapists, and murderers, could be distinguished by specific characteristics, he believed. Lombroso also maintained that criminals had less sensibility to pain and touch; more acute sight; a lack of moral sense, including an absence of remorse; more vanity, impulsiveness, vindictiveness, and cruelty; and other manifestations, such as a special criminal argot and the excessive use of tattooing.