image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include  four major sections: the  Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see  Purdue University's APA Style GuideLinks to an external site. for more information). Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page. For this assignment, please consider the following: How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending and receiving clear messages from your friends and family members? Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 pts Excellent The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. 24 pts Good The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. 13.5 pts Acceptable The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). 0 pts Unacceptable The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning 30 pts Excellent The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/cla.

1. image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image1.png
image2.png
image3.png
image4.png
image5.png
image6.png
Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points

2. toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given
the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are
assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course
material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use
specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources.
This writing assignment should include
four major sections: the
Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and
References (please see
Purdue University's APA Style GuideLinks to an
external site. for more information).
Review the assignment rubric available on the
assignment's page.
For this assignment, please consider the following:
How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending
and receiving clear messages from your friends and family
members?
Reflection Assignment Rubric 75
Reflection Assignment Rubric 75
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30 pts
Excellent
The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course
material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the
relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key
concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the
reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or
useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original
examples.
24 pts
Good

3. The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material
by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2)
identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind
most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or
useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples.
13.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course
material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas
(though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points,
but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
0 pts
Unacceptable
The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material
by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant
content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately
explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or
incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning
behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using
terminology.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning
30 pts
Excellent
The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing
material; (2) making connections between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough
evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and
discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5)
identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

4. 24 pts
Good
The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing
material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of
the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key
assumptions and/or implications.
13.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of
the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2)
making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the
issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring
assumptions and implications.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing
to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing
to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so
inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting,
Grammar and Mechanics
15 pts
Excellent
The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate
and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and
coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and
thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and
uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6)
falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement.
10.5 pts
Good
The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of

5. terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of
tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization
(4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar
mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal
mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page
requirement.
7.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1)
some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2)
ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive;
and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has
spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows
correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum
and maximum page requirement.
4.5 pts
Unacceptable
The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1)
inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2)
reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and
clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no
sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable
grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does
not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.
15 pts
Total Points: 75
Thomas
The root cause can be found by conducting a study using time as
the main metric as well as reason codes that would be recorded
in an excel spreadsheet. Every patient that enters the emergency
department will be added to the excel spreadsheet with the time
they checked in and were seen by a provider. There will also be

6. a section with predefined reason codes that indicates the reason
why they are waiting. A dashboard would then be generated to
show the average amount of time each reason would make a
patient wait. To go along with this, interviews or surveys would
be conducted with the staff to see what they say about the
reasons behind wait times.
The predefined reason codes are as follows:
1. No Available Beds
2. Bed/Room Must Be Prepped
3. Patient Triage
4. Awaiting Patient Discharge or Transfer
5. Seen immediately
The reported info that should be studied stands as the
reason codes with their corresponding wait times and frequency.
After studying this data, further studies must be conducted to
investigate the causes for each.