This document discusses a discussion question for a class on co-teaching. It provides instructions for students to analyze the value of co-teaching, determine causes of education-based conflict and evaluate problem solving strategies. It also lists steps recommended by the National Education Association to develop a successful co-teaching environment, including establishing rapport, blending teaching styles, and leveraging strengths and weaknesses.

1. Ash ESE 633 Week 5 DQ 1 Discussion on Co-
Teaching
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.ese633entirecourse.com/ese-
633-ash/ese-633-week-5-dq-1-discussion-on-
co-teaching
For more classes visit
www.ese633entirecourse.com
This discussion is your opportunity to
demonstrate your understanding of the
objectives; Analyze the value of co-teaching as
an inclusion model of instructional delivery;
Determine some of the causes of education-
based conflict, and evaluate problem solving;
Evaluate problem solving and negotiation
strategies to resolve education-based
conflict;, and Recognize the importance of
knowing personal strengths and weaknesses

2. in conflict resolution. Additionally, the
discussion represents your mastery of the
Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3 and the
MAED Program Learning Outcome 8.
In previous weeks, you learned about the
value of co-teaching including the benefit to
the all the students in the classroom.
However, many special educators feel that
they are not a content-area expert, that they
are seen as a “helper teacher”, or there is not
enough planning time to properly define roles
and responsibilities (Co-Teaching, 2013).
Some may simply default to the classroom
teacher because they do not yet have tenure,
are unsure of how to approach the topic, or
are simply uncomfortable with conflict and
want to avoid it.
To develop a successful co-teaching
environment, the National Education
Association (NEA) lists six steps to facilitate
the collaboration between the special and
general education teachers:
establishing rapport,

3. blend teaching styles,
leverage strengths and weaknesses,