Rome, Pompey The Great And Julius Caesar

Rome, Pompey The Great And Julius Caesar
Pompey was among one of the greats in Roman history. He was compared to Julius Caesar, because
of his military strategy and being loved and appreciated by the Roman people. Pompey was one of
the outstanding Generals the Roman Republic had seen and Statesman to the people of Rome
(Encyclopedia of World Biography). He was one of the three pieces of the first Triumvirate and the
Triumvirate was a big defining moment in his life. The Romans who formed of the Triumvirate was
Julius Caesar, Pompey The Great, and Marcus Licinius Crassus. More importantly, than being a part
of Triumvirate he became consul with Crassus for one year. Eventually, he went into Civil War
against one of the best Roman for the ages. The Roman, Pompey went to war with was one of the
two people of Triumvirate. Pompey opened the door to people about his Early life, his best years,
and how he died.
Pompey Early life all came into existence when he was born into a lineage with some extent known
by Rome. His Father was a remarkably successful general to Rome (Encyclopedia of World
Biography). Even though his father was well known he had the regular education as any Roman
citizen("Pompey the Great."). A report said He went missing for a period of time, then he came out
of hiding with three legions("Pompey the Great."). His life embarked when he first came into the
public eye when he constructed a army for the support of Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Encyclopedia of
World Biography). Sulla and him went on to campaign
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Marcus Aurelius Essay
Marcus Aurelius was born on April 20, 121 AD into a family of royalty. His uncle and adoptive
father, Antoninus Pius, was the emperor of Rome. Aurelius, too, was trained from birth to be a great
ruler like his father. At age eleven, he dedicated himself to religion, although he considered
philosophy to be the "true, inward" religion, one which did not require ceremonies
necessary in others. He was appointed by Emperor Hadrian to priesthood in 129. The Emperor also
supervised his education, which was with the best professors of literature and philosophy of the
time. From his early twenties, he deserted his other studies for philosophy. In 161, Marcus Aurelius
ascended the throne and shared his imperial power with his adopted ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The movie also shows him getting killed by his son Commodus, but he really died of a plague
during another war in which he was trying to defend the territory of Rome.
Throughout his childhood and early adulthood, Aurelius was taught by several talented teachers.
When he was young, the great Epictetus tutored him, followed by a man named Q. Junius Rusticus,
who would accompany Aurelius throughout much of his life. In 161 AD, Pius died, leaving Aurelius
and Pius' other adopted son, known as Verus, to rule together. The two brothers were quite different,
although no disagreements are mentioned between the two. Verus was a headstrong man, who was
more apt to want a war than the contemplative Aurelius was.
Although Aurelius was considered a great man and emperor, he ruthlessly persecuted the Christians.
He considered them a threat to his "imperial system". He thought the Christians were
"superstitious and immoral". However, he did not know very much of the Christian doctrines that he
was so against. He is considered to be the "Last of the Great Emperors."
He ruled Rome during a time of declining prosperity. Again, he ruled during a time when Rome was
in constant battle with the Parthians, Germans, and Britons. However, he did try to improve his
home while he ruled it. He was a man concerned with public welfare. He always made choices that
helped the people instead of himself. He was not

Julius Caesar 's Leadership Skills
John Gonzales
English 4
Ms. Robinson
June 5, 2015
Julius Caesar
"Et tu, Brute?" were Julius Caesar 's last words after being assassinated at his own senate. Of a well–
known family, Gauis Julius Caesar was born on the 12th of 100BCE. He may have obtained his
leadership skills at a very early age due to the fact that he derived from a political family. When
Caesar 's father died, he became the head of the family. This was the moment when Gauis Julius
Caesar took a step forward to excel as the most powerful Roman general during his time.
To illustrate how great of a general Caesar was, I have organized this paper into three sections. Two
of them have subsections. In the first section, I present Julius Caesar's biography, which consist of
his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Julius Caesar reached the age of 17 "he married Cornelia the daughter of Lucius Cornelius
Cinna who was an associate of Gaius Marius, a great popular leader." Lucius Sulla, the dictator of
Rome told Caesar to divorce Cornelia, but he refused to do so and "decided to head to Greece to
study philosophy and oratory."(World Book 12) When he returned to Rome, Caesar and Cornelia
had a daughter, Julia. They were married for fifteen years until she died in 69 BC. Cornelia left him
with a daughter, but she later then died at the age of twenty two. Two years has passed and Caesar
has already found his second wife, Pompeia. She was the daughter of Quintus Pompeius Rufus the
son of former consul and Cornelia(Caesar 's deceased wife). But they were not married for long,
Caesar divorced her for suspiciously being part of a crime on 63 BC. Four years later, Caesar was
married to his last wife, Calpurnia. But they did not have any children.
Death. The republic of Rome has survived for four hundred years. It 's an empire without an
emperor. Ruled by elected officials and written laws. The senate is at the very top of the society, an
elite class of men. All equal, all desperately competing for fame and glory. Their ambition is the
force that fuels the state. To win honor and prestige they expand the empire and build the city.
Risking that one person may become too powerful. By 44 BC, Julius Caesar is the greatest of these
men. He

Sex And The City Of Rome Essay
Sex. It's the taboo. We don't like to talk about it because it makes us uncomfortable, but when
analyzed, it can tell us so much about a society, their core values, and the ideals that controlled their
society. Though the saying is doing it like the Greeks when talking about something perceived
explicit and raunchy, Rome had quiet the culture of sexual back and forth as the Greeks once had,
and that Western culture experiences today. Sex and the city of Rome had complicated lines of what
was acceptable and what was not. Through research, the concept of purity, of both the free roman
bloodline, and the purity of the roles of males and females, serves as a guiding concept when
analyzing what is acceptable and not in ancient Rome. Pudicitia is the core value in Roman sex
culture, and in all cases it is clear that the purity of Roman women, men, and free born bloodline is
the utmost concern.
Both girls and men, however particularly girls, were imagined to uphold pudicitia, a fancy virtue
that will be translated as restraint or chastity. A girl with a high degree of pudicitia, that is, a univira
or 'one–man' lady, would ask for above all to seem modest and to limit her social interaction with
men apart from her husband and male relatives. At a similar time, a single lady didn 't suffer stigma;
within the higher categories, it had been common and even expected for a single or unmarried lady
to espouse. Pudicitia symbolized reason and goodness, whereas impudicitia–that is,

Why Societies Fall
While Great societies are well great, nothing can last forever. Many great societies that people
thought will never die have fallen to various things. Take rome, they fell because inflation of money,
which didn't allow for much spending. Or the Nazi's. That Nazi government was very corrupt and
fell because of what they did. Or even the Etruscans. They were overthrown by the very people they
governed. So Societies fall for many reasons, including corrupt leaders, money inflation, and social
revolution.
Societies fall politically because of things like corrupt government, or invasion.One example is in
Saga where the dark queen of the world doesn't care for anyone but herself, and controls the lives of
everyone. The Citizens of the world lived in poverty, because the government neglected them. As
said in the book, "This world with the humans, pathetic creatures that are so easy to manipulate."
(223 Kostick)
Another good example just like Saga is Nazi Germany, where Adolf Hitler ruled with an iron fist.
He strictly controlled all forms of media, and killed anyone who disagreed with him. Hitler did not
care about his citizens, he only cared about his own personal agenda. As said on Wikipedia, "The
Holocaust and Germany's war in the East was based on Hitler's long–standing view that the Jews
were the great enemy of the German people and that Lebensraum was needed for the expansion of
Germany. He focused on Eastern Europe for this expansion, aiming to defeat Poland and the Soviet

The Myths behind King Arthur
King Arthur In this paper will be discussed the myths behind King Arthur. King Arthur was a British
legend and over time the stories became a collection of stories written by different authors. King
Arthur was actually a general in the fifth century that fought to keep Brittan a free paradise of the
western hemisphere. With the different writers over the years writing about the great King Arthur
the stories got distorted and became more of myth than that of truth of the real King Arthur. The first
writings of King Arthur were around 830 by an author by the name of Nennius, according to the
Britons. There are many writings in existence today, as many as 200 over King Arthur. Much of the
myths of King Arthur and the legends of Merlin and Guinevere are what people read today. Much of
these are myths and not actual facts, though all started out with the actual life facts of King Arthur
from his birth in Tintagel to his death, they just got bent out of shape with the different writers over
the years. King Arthur was actually Lucius Artorius Castus, Arthur's name was originally Artorius, a
family name. This is where King Arthur became more of a myth than a real person. The myths
became more widespread when the marriage of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine in France. This is
where the more romantic and spiritual myths began about King Arthur. In this time the author
Chretien de Troyes of the French court wrote about the Holy Grail. This is one of the first of

William Shakespeare Essay
William Shakespeare
William Shakespeare, the playwright, had a life of virtual mystery, intrigue and relative sadness.
Shakespeare grew up in a modest upbringing and was known to have only completed elementary
school. Though he did not attend college, he would end up as one of histories greatest literary
success stories. The mysteries surrounding the life of William Shakespeare are perpetuated with the
reference to the ‘lost years'; two distinct periods of time from 1578–1582 and 1585–1592, where
Shakespeare seemed to have fallen off the face of the plant. I will discuss the town where
Shakespeare hales from, excerpts from his works and not commonly discussed information.
Followed by a summary of my research.
I recently had the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead, baptismal records reveal that a child of this same name, from the same town, was born on
the 23rd of April in the year 1564. It is believed this is the only documented record of William
Shakespeare's birth. In the year 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway and within one
year had his daughter, Susanna. Two years later Anne bore twins, daughter Judith and son, Hamnet.
Shakespeare was unknown for many years, until in Robert Greene, a very popular dramatist of the
era, wrote in his biography entitled "Groats–worth of Witte," of Shakespeare's conceitedness and
lack of talent.
" for there is an upstart Crow, beautified with our feathers, that with his Tygers hart wrapt in a
Players hyde, supposes he is as well able to bombast out a blanke verse as the best of you: and
beeing an absolute
Johannes fac totum, is in his owne conceit the onely Shake–scene in a countrey "
Greene's inclusion of Shakespeare in his biography seemed to be the catalyst to the remarkable
career of William Shakespeare, as within a year of Greene's mentioning of Shakespeare in his
biography, he [William Shakespeare] published ‘Venus and Adonis'. ‘Venus and Adonis' is the
stereotypical romance story, but of the day were insightful and was a true display of genius. Venus, a
hopeless romantic, falls in love with Adonis, the prototypical athletic, very masculine type. "Hunting
he loved, but love he laugh'd to scorn" refers to Adonis avoidance of

Comparing Lucrece And A Woman Killed With Kindness
Chastity in The Rape of Lucrece and A Woman Killed with Kindness
Renaissance England has been labeled a culture of shame – a society in which an individual's
identity was primarily constructed by the way in which his or her "reputation" or "honor" was
perceived by others. A woman's public reputation was always based on her virginity or chastity. Just
as women were considered the property of their fathers or husbands, a woman's chastity was an
asset owned by and exchanged between the men who possessed her. (Gutierrez, 272) A man's public
reputation was therefore determined not only by his own qualities, but also by his wife's reputation
for chastity. Conversely, a woman's unchastity was a liability to her husband. Rape and ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
8–18)
Collatine values Lucrece's chastity in very mercantile terms, making her the object of Tarquin's
admiration, thereby endangering her: ...why is Collatine the publisher Of that rich jewel he should
keep unknown From thievish ears because it is his own? (Ln. 33–35)
This is a paradox arising from the commodification of female chastity. In order for a husband's
reputation to profit from the chastity of his wife, the value of that chastity must be publicized. Yet,
this very publication endangers it. (Breitenberg, 100) In this case, Collatine's praise of his wife's
chastity leads Tarquin to covet her and destroy her chastity, the source of her value. After she is
raped, Lucrece is only unchaste in body; her mind is still chaste because she has not betrayed her
husband by desiring another man: Though my gross blood be stain'd with this abuse, Immaculate
and spotless is my mind; That was not forc'd, that never was inclin'd To accessary yieldings, but still
pure Doth in her poison'd closet yet endure. (Ln. 1655–1659)
Unfortunately, her physical unchastity cannot be repaired. Lucrece

How Caesar 's Political Career
From the days of the Gracchi brothers until the ultimate demise of the republic, Roman politics was
bound by political divisions between the optimates and the populares. A supporter of the optimates,
Lucius Cornelius Sulla led a life, which was marked with many military successes in the Jugurthine
and Mithridatic Wars, a prominent role in a series of civil wars against Gaius Marius, and his
ultimate rise to the office of dictator following a final coup. Julius Caesar, a nephew of Marius,
descended from a noble family who were ardent supporters of the populares. Like Sulla, Caesar was
greatly renowned as an exceptionally competent military commander, conquering Gaul.
Remarkably, Caesar was also central to a series of civil wars between his former political allies,
Crassus and Pompey, and claimed victory in this conflict just like Sulla – by defiantly marching an
army on Rome and establishing himself as dictator. While Sulla and Caesar were strongly associated
with the opposing senatorial factions, their lives were also subject to very similar circumstances. In
many ways, Caesar's political career was directly inspired by the precedent established by Sulla
decades earlier, of course however, in spite of Sulla's regime. Much of classical and modern
scholarship examines these men separately, and any comparisons of their lives focus on others –
namely, their own contemporary opponents – Sulla with Marius, and, Caesar with Pompey.
Nonetheless, the extraordinary lives of Sulla

Pompey the Great
While it is clear that Pompey the Great was a successful general, how he came to be so is a more
complicated matter. To analyse Pompey's career this essay will first examine his background,
highlighting the advantages and difficulties that arose from being from a fairly new noble family.
Additionally key events in Pompey's career will be explored chronologically, focusing on his most
important military successes as well as his political career. This will attempt to determine how much
his success relied on his personal characteristics or because of his he was able achieve his successes
due to his personal attributes or because of his political relations with noblemen such as Sulla,
Caesar and Cicero.
While Pompey's family was extremely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pompey captured Carbo but hesitated before finally deciding to kill the man who had three times
been censor (Plut.Pom.12). Furthermore his ruthless treatment of Ahenobarnus would give him the
nickname ‘adulescentulus carnifex', meaning ‘teenage butcher'. Sulla gave Pompey a chance at
military success, which he took full advantage of, gaining a good reputation from the start of his
career.
Sulla reinforced this reputation for Pompey, giving him the cognomen ‘magnus' meaning ‘the
Great'. By this time the young Pompey was wildly popular in Rome and asked for a triumph in
81BC. Sulla told Pompey he did not qualify, as he had not even held office in Rome. Pompey is
famed for telling Sulla that more people worshipped the rising than the setting sun, to which Sulla
was surprised at his boldness. Sulla eventually allowed him a triumph. Pompey's career was able to
advance prematurely and this triumph allowed him to increase his image as a young conqueror,
much like Alexander the Great. Finally Sulla was able to help Pompey be enabling him to become
very wealthy. During Sulla's dictatorship, both Pompey and Crassus were able to buy large amounts
of land as it had been confiscated off those on Sulla's proscription.
As Sulla retired and took himself out of public life, Pompey's most important political relationship
was that which he had with Caesar. In 67BC Rome had problems with pirates who were affecting
the

My Visit At The Art Institute Of Chicago
During my visit at the Art Institute of Chicago this quarter, a popular and interesting piece of
artwork that spoke to me in ways that no other artwork did was the, "Tarquin and Lucretia" by
Tintoretto or the artist known as Jacopo Robusti. Tintoretto is also known as the one of the most
well–known Italian Renaissance artists and became interested in painting at a very young age. This
specific piece of artwork was originally created by Tintoretto during 1578 through 1580 and is an oil
painting on a canvas. It has approximate size measurements of 68' 7/8" by 59' 5/8" and is classified
as an Italian work of art. This painting takes place in ancient Roman times where the figure that is
somewhat laying down represents Lucretia, who is the wife of an honest man named Lucius
Tarquinius Collatinus ("Stories and Histories – The Rape of Lucretia", 2016). The other figure that
is directly behind Lucretia is Sextus Tarquinius or Tarquin, who is her rapist and the son of a
dictatorial Roman king named Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. Subsequently after her rape, Lucretia
tells her husband and father about the incident. In order to save herself from the guilt and
misrepresentation of her reputation, she stabs herself to death ("Stories and Histories – The Rape of
Lucretia", 2016). In the article titled, "Illicit Arousal: The Erotic Subtext of Tintoretto 's Tarquin and
Lucretia" within The Journal of the History of Art by Sabrina DeTurk, it is stated that Lucretia is
seen to be "a moral

Themes In The Rape Of Lucrece
In The Rape of Lucrece, there is one theme throughout the poem, and that is to conquer. The themes
of war, violence, and the evidence of Tarquin's sexual conquest remain constant. However, this is
present specifically with the physical rape of Lucrece itself and the parading of her body around
Rome after her death. The constant air of sex and power dominates this poem. Lucrece is used as a
political symbol that must be conquered throughout the entirety of the reading. The Rape of Lucrece
displays the idea of male dominance and female silence in Tarquin's powerful rage and Lucrece's
ability to be dominated.
In the time of the Renaissance society, men often held positions of power over women. Women were
not seen as having an independent voice, as they were often seen as property of their fathers before
they were married. In The Rape of Lucrece, Tarquin is able to control Lucrece and silence her. The
physical act of raping her is able to dominate her physically and emotionally, and that is what
remains constant throughout this poem. If Lucrece has anything, it is her chastity which holds great
power, and that is stolen from her in such a grotesque way.
However, before the physical act can occur there are several obstacles that must be conquered before
Lucrece herself can be taken. This adds to the idea constant idea of war and power through
conquest. "The locks between her chamber and his will, each one by him enforced, retired his ward;
But as they open they all rate his ill. Which drives the creeping thief to some regard. The threshold
grates the door to have him heard" (302–306). This scene is the first obstacle that must be overcome
in the attempt to proceed with his final act. The locks to her door are squeaky as they open,
threatening to reveal Tarquin. The threshold rubs against the opening of the door, also attempting to
make his presence known. "Through little vents and crannies of the place the wind wars with his
torch to make him stay, and blows the smoke of it into his face" (310–312). Here, a second
challenge is presented. His torch is extinguished, which will make him unable to see in the dark
night, but he moves forward, determined to conquer each of these new obstacles.

Excavation Of Pompeii
Before its destruction, the city of Pompeii was home to a flourishing city that through observations
made from its archeological excavation and through the analysis of certain artifacts and various
buildings An exact image of the city as it stood in the first century is presented to the archaeologists.
This provides insight into the lives of the people living at the time.
Pompeii is an old Roman town–city located in the territory of Pompeii and commune in the
Campania region of Italy. Pompeii was destroyed and buried under 13 to 20 feet of volcanic ash in
the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79 (Beard 22). Pompeii was founded in the sixth or seven
century BC by the Oscans and came under Roman rule in the 4th BC but was conquered to ... Show
Pompeii as an archeological site is a source of information on so many aspects of the economic,
religious, social and political life of the ancient world. Many well–preserved house shrines give a
hint on the importance of the vitality of religion in the family. Pompeii had a busy port that exported
products throughout the Mediterranean region; this was a haven for the tradesmen and merchants
living near the city gates. Unfortunately, these excavations are endangered by tourist traffic at the
site, changes in weather patterns and destructive vegetation. In the 1950s, many structures were
fitted with concrete roofs but have deteriorated over the years making upkeep difficult. Pompeii
faces numerous problems including, mismanagement, degradation, and vandalism. In July 2008, the
Italian government took the unforeseen step of declaring a one–year state of emergency for the site
and a special officer was appointed to oversee the site (Sonneborn 17).This move emphasizes the
need to importance of preservation, restoration and critical analysis of the evidence available before
it is lost

Jacques Louis David And His Life During The French Revolution
Jacques Louis David: An in–depth comparison of his Roman Empire Masterpieces and his life
during the French Revolution Semester Research Paper Fall 2014 Throughout history many works
of art have depicted events that have happened in the past through the artists eyes. In these works we
can see many styles and types of art that display the artist mood, feelings, reactions and perspective.
The early beginnings of Rome and the struggles that occurred are seen in Jacques Louis David early
paintings. He used neoclassic style to portray these vivid scenes of the brutality Roman people faced
during its beginning years. The many early pieces by Jacques Louis David are painted to showing
the struggles of Rome during the first half of the empire, he then related these pictures to some
events that David experienced throughout his life. Jacques Louis David was born in France in 1749,
when he was nine years old his father was killed in a dual, his mother then left him with his two
wealthy uncles who raised him for the following years. At a young age he was gifted in basic art
skills and styles with an imaginative mind full of ideas. Despite opposition from his Uncles he was
able to pursue his dream of painting. He was given the opportunity to learn painting skills from
François Boucher who was a French painter of the Rococo style, and a leading painting of the time
as well as a family friend. Boucher noted the change in times from Rococo period to the neoclassic
style and noticed

Cicero Model Governor
If we are to consider the governorship of Cicero in Cilicia based on his letters, we are left to assume
that he was one of the best governors of his time. Though he did not particularly care to be governor,
he performed excellently, reinstituting or maintaining many of the traits of Roman governors, such
as justice, self–control, and approachability. His aims were only to fulfil the role of governor well
and return home. His attitude, however, was far from that of a model Roman governor. He valued
himself and those around him before the state of Rome. As such, though he may have been an
excellent governor in conduct, his attitude leaves Cicero far removed from being a model governor.
Considering Cicero's actual performance as governor from the letter's provided, Cicero appears to
have been an excellent governor. Regardless of where he went while on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Hypocrisy can be seen from Cicero when, in a letter Caelius writes to Cicero, Caelius requests
panthers from Cicero by writing "It would be a disgrace if you don't do much better that Patiscus (a
businessman in Cilicia), who sent ten [panthers] to Curio" (3) Cicero, in a later letter, accepts
Caelius's request. Cicero's hypocrisy can be seen in a later letter, whenever he stated how he found it
good that Caelius had told Marcus Octavius that he could not accept Octavius's request for panthers.
(8) In his own words, he stated, "In future, always say no, very definitely, to such improper requests.
For I am pretty firm by myself, but really inspired by your support to outdo everyone– you'll find
this out for yourself– in self–control, justice, approachability and clemency (abstinentia, iustitia,
facilitas, clementia) (8). From this action, Cicero's intentions of his governorship become clear– he
sought only to maintain a good public image. Privately, he did not mind breaking a few rules to help
his close

Marcus Crassus : Contribution To The Fall Of The Roman...
Marcus Crassus was a Roman politician who contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. In his
beginnings, he was raised in a small house with six other people. Marrying a widowed woman he
would have two children and live a well–ordered life. He was a man with vast wealth and sharp
political skills. His early success started when he allied himself with Lucius Cornelius Sulla against
Marius. Following his victories, he would have a fall in with the law before the Spartacus Rebellion.
Then he would take his rightful place as a senator and a member of the First Triumvirate. Many
people don't know the name Crassus but his legacy will live on in the history books. Crassus
Research Paper Marcus Licinius Crassus was born in 115 BC in the Roman Republic. His father
Publius Licinius Crassus was a commander in Iberia and consul in 97 BC. When growing up
Crassus reared in a small house with two brothers and his parents. While his parents were alive his
brothers got married so they all shared the same table. This is seen to be the main reason why
Crassus was temperate and moderate in his manner in life. According to Plutarch (1916),
"The Romans, it is true, say that the many virtues of Crassus were obscured by his sole vice of
avarice; and it is likely that the one vice which became stronger than all the others in him weakened
the rest" (p. 317).
This explains that Crassus's mortality was shadowed by a sole vice of greed and it weakened the rest
of his mortalities. In his

Plutarch's The Life of Crassus and Caesar Essay
Plutarch's The Life of Crassus and Caesar Plutarch presented history through biographical stories of
the people that were important and influential during the time period he wished to address.
However, after having read some of his work, one realizes that Plutarch inserts his own personal
opinion and views of the people at hand into the factual documentation of their lives. For example,
in The Life of Crassus, Plutarch expresses a general dislike and negative view of the man, but in The
Life of Caesar he portrays the life through a lens of praise. It also seems that he uses his opinions of
the people that he writes about to subtly extend moral lessons to the reader. What follows is a further
isolation of Plutarch's opinions and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
…. He became one of the best speakers in Rome, and by care and application, was able to
surpass those who were more highly gifted by nature. …. often when Pompey and Cicero and
Caesar were reluctant to speak, he undertook the whole management of the case himself, thereby
gaining an advantage over them in popularity, since people thought of him as a man willing to take
trouble to help others. In fact, this readiness to help others in their time of need was his one saving
grace was instrumental in his retention of power in Rome. He often threw lavish parities, lent people
money willingly, and was always eager to lend a helping hand to anyone who needed his assistance
in court. Crassus also always treated everyone in a warm and courteous manner no matter his or her
wealth, power, or station in society. For these reasons, the people truly liked him. In Rome, such
popularity was the handmaiden of power. Plutarch does not leave Crassus's virtues untainted. He
makes sure to point out that greed often overcame and interfered with the good things that Crassus
did, to further support his belief that greed is such a terrible thing that it overpowers everything else:
… and he used to lend money to his friends without interest; but when the time

Cicero 's Life Project Paper About Cicero
Lives Project Paper About Cicero Cicero was born in 106 BC. His mother was from a good family,
and his father was just a member of the equestrian order. However, this had not changed the destiny
of Cicero of being a very successful and famous poet, lawyer, orator, philosopher, and politician in
the future. Cicero started to show his intelligence and talent since his school age. He was a quick
and broad learner who was regarded by Plato as the one who was "fitted for scholarship and the
pursuit of wisdom" (Plutarch, p. 325). Though he did not prioritize his enthusiasm on politics, his
nature made him a candidate for public affairs.
Before going officially to politics. Cicero spent some time in Greece studying philosophy, which
played an influential role in his later political career because he brought the Greek culture and
philosophy to a wide attention of Romans. Cicero started his political career as a Quaestor. After
defeated Catiline, he was selected as the consul in 63 BC. During his consulship years, Cicero
abandoned the laws of Sulla and bravely punished the conspirators, which impressed the Romans
according to Plutarch, "by such comparatively painless methods, with no disturbance and no civil
strife" (p. 345). However, his arrogance and his bad habit of attacking others with jokes make him a
lot of enemies. Cicero was put into exile for sixteen months. When Caesar was murdered, Cicero
regained the power of leading the country. However, Cicero became too passionate

Essay on Julio Caesar
|
| | Yenisleidys Duarte Professor Reagan SmithHumanities – Greek and RomanOctober 20,
2012Essay #3 | | | 5. Who is the protagonist in the play? Is it Caesar, who dies well before the end
but whose power and name continue on? Or is it Brutus, the noble man who falls because of his
tragic flaws? | | |
Literary scholars have debated for centuries about the question of who exactly is the protagonist of
the William Shakespeare's play called "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." The seemingly simple answer
to this question would be Julius Caesar himself, after all, the play is named after him and all the
events of the play relate to him. However, Caesar only appears in three scenes (four if the ghost is
included), thus ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Calpurnia cried out terrified three times during the night, "Help ho – they murder Caesar!" There
must be learned that the dream in which Caesar's wife visualized her husband's death was some kind
of premonition (a strong feeling of an unpleasant act that was about to happen). Her presentiment
was ignored completely putting aside the fact that it was his woman that tried to warn him of what
was coming She begged and plead Caesar to stay home that day, however, nobody ever paid any
attention to any of her dreams.
In the battles between Antony and Brutus, Caesar was often mentioned in their dying words.
"Caesar, thou art revenged, even with the sword that killed thee." These are Cassius' dying words.
Brutus's final words are somewhat similar, "Caesar, now be still; I killed not thee with half so good a
will." Their words represent that although final thoughts consisted of the evil crime they had
committed, Caesar had nothing to do with their deaths. Caesar, a highly respectable man at some
point, had no more influence on the outcome of the play than did any character.
Brutus dominated his own actions throughout the story. Moreover, nobody was able to discover if
the tragedy was affecting his thoughts. Stoicism, which is the endurance of pain or hardship without
a display of feelings or complaint, was one of the characteristics Brutus possessed. He was a model
stoic. However, he was only human, and at the play's end, he committed suicide. This

My Aspirations For This Class
Personal Statement
My aspirations for this class originally was to study and learn the history of the Romans, in
particular the Roman Republic Era, but when I learnt that we were to study Greek culture and
society, I was disappointed. Although the class had surprised me and intrigued me, I still was still
fascinated and oblivious to Roman history. Therefore I chose Pompey, a famous general and great
rival of the legendary Caesar. Other than these two statements, I had not known any background
information on Pompey.
My only real primary source, Plutarch, was a very direct and informative source, but lacked in the
areas which would have helped my report. Plutarch retold Pompey's life from beginning till end, but
did not give any biased ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I found I had to sift through a lot of information about his military efforts before I could get to his
political actions, which in comparison were short. I overcame this by choosing to rely on the texts
and Plutarch, and if I found information coming from other sources which support that, I would use
it. If I found new information that wasn 't found in the texts, I would not use it. This was my tactic to
play it safe and not give out false information and perspective views.
My main problem when writing the report was that I had introduced too much of the historical side
of Pompey, and ignored his influence on to society, or the society itself, which is the core of this
report. I worry that even my final draft is still too much like a biography than a report.
I had to also study other important individuals such as Sulla, Caesar and Crassus, all who is just as
difficult to study as Pompey. I found that more information about the political ambition of Pompey
was given through texts about Caesar than texts about Pompey himself. This was probably because
Pompey was a military minded individual, while Caesar relied on politics and the people for his
power.
My opinion on Pompey was that he was too hasty and was not aware of the consequences for his
actions. This would specifically affect me, for I too can relate and say that I am very boisterous and
rash, do first

Analysis Of Christopher Nolan 's ' The Dark Knight Trilogy '
My opinion, an auteur is a director who leaves a personal message or impact on the films they're
working on. Not only visually, but also utilizing their techniques and motifs which are always used
in films. The director I have chosen to write about is none other than Christopher Nolan. I chose to
write about him not just because he did one of my favorite superhero movies of all time (The Dark
Knight Trilogy), but he is one of my favorite directors of all time. After reading Andrew Sarris
article, I will stick with the meaning of what I have said before, but there are three circles I must
know: the outer, middle and inner (technique, style, and meaning). Nolan in my opinion, fits within
the whole auteur thing because of the way his films are. Hence, why I called him the Modern
Master. I noticed that in all three of Nolan's films that I watched (Batman Begins, Inception, and The
Prestige) that the technique or should I say style he uses in all three of the films is the fact that main
hero is always troubled or lost in a way. To me, he does that in all three of the films, so that we can
see the hero overcome what's troubled him or her. Plus, they all kind of have a thirst for revenge. In
other words, that is basically his theme in all of the films he had done. A perfect example is Batman
Begins. When Bruce wanted to kill the man who killed his parents, but when Rachel, his childhood
friend, slaps him and told Bruce that your father would be ashamed of you. After the man was

The Innocence Of Sextus Roscius Of Ameria Essay
The general purpose of this study is to examine the method, style, techniques or devices etc.
employed by Cicero in convincing his audience of the innocence of Sextus Roscius of Ameria.
Generally, studying rhetoric introduces us to some of the most influential thinkers of Western
culture. Knowledge of rhetoric helps us to understand our world because every human being
practices rhetoric and comes under its influence. This is because every day, we use words to shape
attitudes and encourage people to act in certain ways.
Also, teaching is a rhetorical act and everybody will certainly teach one way or the other in his or
her life, either as parents teaching their children, a friend teaching a friend, an elder sister teaching a
younger one or an accomplished bank –robber teaching an apprentice etc., so rhetoric needs to be
studied by everyone . Also language used "as symbolic means of inducing cooperation' appears all
around us in literature" in advertising, broadcast journalism, politics, religion, arts, film and
conversation. Much of what we say, hear, read and do involves someone's influencing someone else
to make choices and the process whereby we make them. When we practice rhetoric, we use
language spoken or written to induce cooperation in our audience.
1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY
This study focuses on rhetoric and persuasion. It examines the different rhetorical devices used by
Cicero in his speech and the elements of persuasion involved. It is limited to just that one speech

Manipulation In Julius Caesar
Imagine a world where no one can be trusted. Everyone is seeking to manipulate everyone else into
helping them achieve their own twisted goals. Very rarely will one man be seen being truly loyal.
Most are all "in it" for themselves. Now, picture a woman that has no control over these decisions
and the outcomes. She must sit and wait for her husband to, hopefully, return from a day of betrayal.
This woman is Julius Caesar's Portia, the wife of Brutus. He was Caesar's trustworthy ally before
Cassius got ahold of him, turning him against a man he pledged his loyalty to. Together they, with
the help of a few other men, end Caesar's reign before it could truly begin. This being the basic plot
of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. It takes an ironic turn when, towards the end, both Brutus and
Cassius committed suicide. Brutus' acts caused his wife to ultimately end herself as well before he
even got the chance to kill himself. Everything was out of her control, this drove her to insanity so,
she swallowed fire.
Without knowing this she would still be a decent leader. She uses manipulation and is a "worry
wort," but is balanced out by how much she cares and how she's able to hide her worry if need be.
Part 1: Portia the Leader A woman as a leader? How preposterous! Indeed it is, for that time period
at least. That doesn't change the fact she'd be a decent leader. If, only, she was given the chance. A
leader cares deeply for their men and this is no different for Portia. When Brutus was

Julius Caesar Essay: Reaching from the Grave
Reaching from the Grave of Julius Caesar
It is assumed that the title of a work should reflect the nature of its content. The title should relate to
the to the central influence which controls the flow of the work. Shakespeare's Julius Caesar seems
to contradict that convention. Caesar meets his bloody end at the hands of conspirators in the first
scene of Act III, barely halfway through the play. He is not the tragic hero; that distinction lies with
Brutus and Cassius, around whom the play revolves before and after the assassination. This essay
will show that although Caesar is not the hero of this tragedy, he certainly is the title character.
Like the storm in the first scene of The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thy evil spirit, Brutus.
BRUTUS. Why com'st thou?
GHOST. To tell thee thou shalt see me at Philippi.
BRUTUS. Well; then I shall see thee again?
GHOST. Ay, at Philippi.
Julius Caesar, IV.iii.280–284
Octavius, the Caesar that does appear to Brutus at Philippi, brings this rebellious mood to the
battlefield, saying, "I draw a sword against conspirators. When think you that the sword goes up
again? Never, till Caesar's three and thirty wounds be well avenged; or till [I, too,] have added
slaughter to the sword of traitors" (V.i.51–55). Octavius and Antony dedicate themselves to
avenging Caesar. The dead ruler, however, exacts his revenge himself, driving both Cassius and
Brutus to suicide. "Here, take thou the hilts, and when my face is covered, as 'tis now, guide thou the
sword –– Caesar, thou art avenged, even with the sword that killed thee" (V.iii.43–46). Thus Cassius

bids his servant Pindarus to kill him. One by one, the other conspirators follow suit. Brutus,
discovering their slain forms, declares, "O Julius Caesar, thou art mighty yet! Thy spirit walks
abroad, and turns our swords in our own proper entrails" (V.iii.94–96). Scene v shows Brutus finally
giving in and joining his fellow senators in death, unable to bear the grief of their loss nor the guilt
at killing Caesar in the first place. Thus Caesar, though dead and physically gone, remains a
powerful presence throughout the second half of the play. The guilt that he inspires in the

Symbolism in The Hunger Games
When reading The Hunger Games, one might not read and think deeply enough about something
like symbolism. Looking into it, however, the characters in this novel by Suzanne Collins seem to be
named after historical figures, words that are descriptive of their characters, and even plants.
Realizing this really makes reading the novel much more interesting, because now the reader has
something or someone to compare each of the main or supporting characters to. The Hunger Games
makes relates many of the characters to historical figures. Many of the male figures seem to be
named after Roman politicians, philosophers, and poets. Take Cinna, for instance. Cinna, in the
novel, is Katniss' and Peeta's stylists for the Games. He does their makeup and creates their outfits to
wear for the opening ceremony, for the interview with Caesar Flickerman, and for in the arena. His
artistic skills relate to that of Gaius Helvius Cinna, a Roman poet. He also resembles to Lucius
Cornelius Cinna, although more so later in the sequel, Catching Fire, because they are both defiant.
Cinna, for turning the wedding dress President Snow wanted Katniss to dress in for her interview
with Caesar Flickerman into a mockingjay, which turned into a symbol of rebellion, and Lucius
Cornelius Cinna for staging a rebellion. What really ties it all together is that Cinna, Lucius
Cornelius Cinna, and Gaius Helvius Cinna all met their demise by murder. Caesar Flickerman is
also a prime example of relating to a

The Danger Of Power In Plutarch Roman Lives : Sulla
George Santayana once quoted, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
In Rebecca Burgess' and Hugh Liebert's Wall Street Journal article, "From Cicero to Trump, They're
All in Plutarch's Lives," they speculated that there is no better book to read to learn from history's
past than Plutarch's Lives. Plutarch had the ability to show citizens how to admire and censure those
in power and evaluate candidates and this couldn't come better today in our political situation
(Burgess and Liebert). Plutarch shows the danger of power changing individuals in Plutarch Roman
Lives "Sulla." Sulla, a man who went from being poor to gaining dictatorship during the Roman
Empire, can become a lesson to many about the dangers of changing from obtaining power by three
different events in his life: his first victory, the Social War and Mithridatic War, and gaining power
of Rome. The first of Sulla's power changing was after his first victory. Sulla went from having
nothing to getting a little taste of power. Sulla was born into a noble family, but was hardly brought
up like he was a part of one (175). His father left him no money and he ended up living in a cheap
rented apartment (175). As a young adult, he didn't take anything serious and was known to hang out
with actors or comedians and share their lifestyle (176). It wasn't until he was appointed quaestor in
Marius' first consulship to make war in Africa on Jugurtha, that Sulla experienced his first
government

King Arthur
King Arthur, was he man of truth or myth? King Arthur was a real person, not just a fictional
character. While many believe that King Arthur was a non–fictional character, others feel that he
was a fictional character. This was because there is no written record of a King Arthur in any area
where he was reportedly born or deceased. King Arthur was real because there many people recall
King Arthur or who have known personal stories of him, his family, and the wars he so bravely
participated in. There are many people who recall King Arthur or know someone he was based off
of. King Arthur was not real because it was not recorded in history that there was ever a "King
Arthur." Even though it is argued widely throughout history ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There are many places that tell legends and myths of the brave king who once lived there. Historians
have found that Croatia was most likely the burial place of King Arthur. It is also said that he was a
high–born military leader by the name of Lucius Artorius Castus, who ruled a century after the
Romans had left. Historians have read into this lead and are now searching the tomb of the late
leader. (Reporter). The location of King Arthur's last battle can be identified as well as some of the
characters, meaning the battle actually happened! Some works of literature record Arthur not just as
a hero, but a tyrant as well. According to Gildas, "Arthur is spoken of as a tyrant, and wholly
without heroic qualities, showing that the life was composed before Geoffrey of Monmouth had
thrown a false glamour over this disreputable prince, who generally figures in the Legends of the
Welsh Saints as an egregious bully, with nothing of the "White Arthur" about him." Just this one
quote explains that King Arthur was real, even if he was not the angel everyone thought he was.
Although the legends state that King Arthur was apart of twelve battles, it is not true. He was most
likely a military leader who did a fantastic job, so people wrote about him and his conquests. Even
now we tend to take something so small and exaggerate it into a magnificent happening. Why
should we suggest our ancestors do differently? King Arthur was said to have been buried in

The Roman Republic
For Centuries the Roman Republic was ruled over by some twenty families of Patricians , these
families represented the upper crust of society, a society which prided itself on the continuation of
the family line. This system was threatened by the "ideology of novitas" which people achieved
glory not from there illustrious family history, but through merit. Cato the Elder and Gaius Marius
were not born of noble stock and thus represent two of the best examples of "novus homo" in action.
The Roman Republic 's system was heavily stacked against "a novus homo" from the period of
200BC–100BC only 29 Consuls were of Plebeian background, which alludes to the fact the having a
good family genealogy, would undoubtedly benefit one political career. The Scipionic epitaph of
Scipio Baratus details the successes of a great Roman, who 's honour and bravery, as well as his
occupation of the Aedileship, and the Consulship ultimately helped spring board the career of his
son "Lucius Cornelius Scipio" . From this we can see that fama, gloria, and a good family
background greatly help ones political ambitions, Marius and Cato both came from a "Plebeian"
background of which Marius took pride in going as far as accusing the aristocracy of bitterness by
despising him since he reached the Consulship without family connections or glory. There might
have been jealousy, and envy amongst the aristocracy that there "rightful" place was being usurped
by an outsider "a Pleb"
Novitas developed

The Fall Of The Republic And Fall
Main Article
When articles are written about the fall of the Republic and the fall of democracy, the blame is often
attributed to one man: Julius Caesar. However, a figure that tends to be overlooked in popular
history held the consulship over fifty years prior to the Republic's inevitable fall was named Gaius
Marius. Coming from an obscure Volscian town in the territory of Arpinum, sixty miles south–east
of Rome, Plutarch wrote of Marius coming from poor origins and rising to the consulship as an
archetypal 'rags to riches' story. This is nothing more than dramatic flair, since in reality he came
from a good municipal family who were members of the local aristocracy, with the contemporary
view characterising them as powerful nobles in their native town.
Upon being elected consul in 107 BC, Marius was presented with the chance to cement his legacy.
Accordingly, he began to reform the military. Before leaving for Africa, to finish off Jugurtha, he
changed the traditional way of recruitment. Previously, Roman citizens were recruited on the basis
of their property qualification: Scullard writes that the rule was that the army should be recruited
only from men enrolled in the five classes. Instead, Marius appealed to the proletarii, who were men
that lacked the necessary property qualification. This wasn't any great innovation, as property
qualifications had already been reduced. He simply completed the next logical step. But the results
of this reform were

Gnaeus Pompey and the fall of the Roman Republic Essay
Events which stretch as far back as the reforms of the Gracchi brothers' meant that the Rome was
facing a Republic that was already deteriorating before Pompey had stepped into power. While
Pompey's quest for power was harmful, many other factors were also baleful to the Republic, and
were hence instrumental in its decline. Gnaeus Pompeius's measures to gain power were harmful
because it was primarily a paradox to the principles of being part of a Republic with all its notions
of shared and short power. The fundamental reason why there were other reasons for the decline of
the system are that the military power was given to him, the already weak Senate, and the fact that
Pompey was not the only player in the breakdown of the Republic due ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Aside from this, it also hints at the Senate's role in the harm due to its own weakness and lack of
handle on the situation by allowing for Pompey to undergo the triumph.
Though Pompey sought power by manipulating the political system to his own advantage, the fact
that the Senate was already weak and hence gave him this power.This shows that although Pompey's
actions were detrimental to the fall of the Republic, he was not the sole contributor. Pompey was
both underage and had held none of the required offices, yet the Senate passed decrees exempting
him from these traditional prerequisites, thus allowing for him to be joint consul with Crassus in 70
BC. According to Cicero, "absolute power" was what he had sought, and thus this ambition had
nothing to do with "the happiness and honour of the community." This reveals a callously ruthless
dimension to Pompey, in that he would undertake any measure to achieve his own goals. However,
it should also be noted that Cicero's interest areas are sometimes narrow and deliberately, or
accidentally selective. By reaching the top without any previously held positions of consequence,
Pompey the Great had manipulated the political system to his own advantage. Thus, by doing so he
undermined the Senate, reiterating its insignificance and weakness.
While Pompey's political alliances were harmful to the Republican system, he evidently wasn't the
only player in

African American Empire
Debuting January 7th 2015, Empire has become the most popular television series in the history of
the FOX network. Empire is based around hip hop mogul, Lucious Lyon, played by Terrence
Howard, who goes from rags to riches. Early on in the series Lucious is diagnosed with ALS.
According to the ALS Association, ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a nervous system
disease that weakens the muscles and impacts physical functions. ALS is incurable and Lucious is
preparing to die. Before he dies, he must choose among his three sons Andre, Jamal, and Hakeem,
on who he will leave his infamous music record label, Empire. The drama doesn't stop there. Within
the series Cookie Lyon, Lucious' ex–wife and the woman who took the fall for his drug ... Show
He is using the character of Jamal to do so. Through the character of Jamal, Daniels is showing how
hard it can be for an African American man to be gay. They get disowned by ones that should love,
cherish, and protect them and they do not get treated with respect in the society. Daniels' also uses
the relationship between Jamal and Luscious to channel Beliefs and Values of homophobia in the
African American community. In the article, Five Key Questions of Media Literacy, it states that
"media of all kinds carry messages about whom and what is important those are the belief and
values that the media is sending". Lucious believes that Empire's fans will not approve of Jamal's
sexuality and encourages him to keep his sexual orientation hidden to prevent harming the
reputation of Empire. During the fourth episode, Lucious threatens to stop supporting Jamal all
together if he decides to reveal his sexuality. Jamal then moves out of the apartment that his father is
paying for because he realizes that by continuing to allow his father to pay for his living expenses is
giving his father the right to make demands about what he think is best for Jamal. This then starts a
war between the two. Jamal becomes more focused on himself and his freedom and Lucious does
whatever he can to keep Jamal from the media, even prevented him from releasing

Gaius Marius
Roman's had an idealised view of what their politicians should be. From their ancestry to their
attributes. In this essay I shall be looking at Gaius Marius. How did he live up to the Roman ideals?
What are those ideals? I shall a number of these ideals one by one. But first I shall discuss what
ideals the Romans have and why. The easiest way to find out the ideals Romans had. Was to look
some tomb inscriptions. These are useful since the Romans would list the most important things
about this person. Since what is important in one's life is subjective. It tells us what the Roman
found important and therefore these tell us what they value. Giving us insight to what Romans value
in their politicians. The Scipionic Epitaphs can show us how and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Marius had two triumphs. He must of been a great military commander to earn achievement. His
military process is what got him his first consulship. Plutarch describes how his "name and
reputation spread through Africa" and he also notes Marius' "display of consummate courage"
(Plutarch Marius 7) Your name and reputation don't spread for no reason; Marius must have had
excelled in the qualities most sought after in regard to war. Plutarch says how he showed the he was:
capable of going through what the soldiers injured, his foresight. The former gave him "considerable
affection and loyalty from the troops", this loyalty lead to the soldiers writing back to Rome, stating
that "The African war could only be won if Marius was elected consol" (Plutarch Marius 7) This
shows that Marius must have excelled hugely at military process. The Scipio Epitaph's list the father
and offices the father held and military successes. This must have been a compelling argument to the
Romans. Plutarch notes how "Metellus was visually displeased about this" (Plutrach Marius 8)
Giving us further evidence to how people felt about new men. He had to quickly get back to Rome.
With his first consulship he "enrolled a large number of paupers, and slaves into the army"
(PLutrach Marius 9). This action is unpreceded and must have annoyed some. This shows that he
thought of new ways to use the Roman armies. Which was basically taking the poor and training
them. That training would appear to pay off. He got a triumph. It must have been quite a shock to
the Romans in some ways that a new man who becomes consol comes into Rome celebrating a
triumph. Q.Metelleus told Marius that he'd support Marius being consol with his son. An insult of
sorts since Marius already 49 and that son about fifteen years younger than him. To achieve
something that hadn't happened in a long time and for it to be a new man must have shocked a lot of
people. Or at

Gladius Marius In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Gladius Marius was born in a small town 100km outside Rome, long ago it was conquered by the
romans. The towns people were granted citizenship, with the exception that they cannot vote. In 186
BC the town was granted the privilege to vote. Marius decided to join the army. Since he was in the
army he decided to run for one of the military tribunes. He lost the election and didn't receive
tribune. He decided to run for quaestorship and managed to get elected quaestor, but his wasn't
enough. He decided to run for praetor, and won by sliver. This resulted in him getting sent to Spain
to do a military operation. After returning he did not receive any praise and did not run for
consulship. But during that year he married Julia, Julius Caesar's aunt. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar decided to cross the Rubicon river with a legion and consequently ignited civil war. Pompey
was forced to flee south. Pompey managed to escape before Caesar was able to capture Pompey.
Caesar headed east to try to defeat Pompey. He defeated Pompey in Greece but he fled. Caesar
returned to Rome where he was appointed dictator. He was heading to Egypt on pursuit of Pompey
and arrived at the beheading of Pompey. Pompey was captured when he arrived at Egypt, Ptolemy
captured him and ordered him to be beheaded. Caesar was given Pompey's head. Because of this he
became heavily involved with the Egyptians and their people. This would result in him fighting their
wars, between Ptolemy and Cleopatra. Caesar defended Cleopatra. After spending years fighting
against Ptolemy, Caesar managed to defeat the Pharos's army and he appointed Cleopatra as the

The Legacy Of Pompey The Great
Introduction
Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, known as 'Pompey' or 'Pompey the Great', was a military leader and a
politician, who along with Crassus and Caesar formed the first Triumvirate, making him one of the
most powerful men in Rome. A man who demanded respect from all, he gained power through his
military prowess and influence, and even had the gall to give himself the title Magnus, which was
Latin for the word 'Great'. Pompey obviously was following the steps of the Macedonian General
and leader Alexander the Great. Pompey's life was littered with amazing military feats and
achievements, yet despite his connections and military might, Pompey had an army of veterans, and
in particular was strong in the naval area, the ever popular and legendary Julius Caesar triumphed
between the titans for the right to rule.
Pompey's motivations
Pompey was an intelligent and ambitious person who from the beginning had aimed for glory. Born
into a wealthy and privileged family, Pompey's father was Gnaeus Pompeius Strabo, a military
leader and a consul, the highest office in the Roman Republic. Pompey Magnus, known for his
military feats and achievements, would have been motivated by his father to join the army.Gnaeus
Pompeius Strabo would have educated his son military strategies and fighting techniques. "...Strabo,
the father of Pompey; during whose lifetime, it is true, they stood in awe of his military power, as
indeed he was a formidable warrior..." (Plutarch, Life of Pompey the Great,

Pompey And His Extraordinary Influence
Laurel Frick
Magistra Hickey
Latin I
24 April 2017
Pompey and His Extraordinary Influence
Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, better known as Pompey, once said, "More people worship the rising
than the setting sun." He transformed the last generation of the Roman Republic forever. He solved
many of Rome's problems. Pompey was a great military and political figure.Need a specific thesis
statement Gnaeus Pompeius was born in 106 BCE. Gnaeus was born during the time of political
tension between Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla. His father was Pompeius Strabo, who
was a wealthy military leader in Rome. Strabo was not popular amongst the people, however he was
a military general and was suitable for the job needed to be done. Strabo was ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This is perfect for Pompey, because since the beginning, Pompey's role model was the Famous
Alexander the Great. Nowadays, Pompey is known to be the Roman Alexander. Sometimes,
Pompey's young age kept him from leveling up his position. He was too young to be a senator, but
authorities were eager to bend the rules so he could be one. However, he refused in order to
exaggerate his rank. Pompey marries his third wife Mucia in 79 BC. Together, they bore three
children: Pompeia (daughter), Sextus (son), and Gnaeus (son). In 81 BC, Sulla named himself
dictator of Rome. Dictatorship was established during the times of Hannibal, 135 years before.
Dictatorship was intended to last 6 months in intense crisis. However, when Sulla announced
himself dictator, there was no time limit. This is argued to be the beginning of the fall of the Roman
Republic; when the strive of power became more desired over keeping the Republic in tact. Sulla
became 'Dictator of for the Reconstruction of State'. Unlike Marius, Sulla was more interested in the
Aristocracy, than the regular poor people. In 79, Sulla retired from public life and raced against
death to finish his memoirs. Sulla died of an ulcer in 78. Pompey is in charge of Sulla's funeral. On
page 35 of Pompey The Roman Alexander by Peter Greenhalgh it says, "He therefore put the whole
weight of his influence behind Catulus, won over the majority of Lepidus' supporters by a
combination of threats and entreaties,

Up With Kaiser ! Down With The Liberators !
"Up with Kaiser! Down with the Liberators!" Panic has grappled the capital of the Russian Republic
as news of the death of Julius Kaiser on March 15, 1956 have spread. Kaiser was the victor of many
battles, and the best known among his recent conquests was the American Wars (1942–1950),
wherein he annex the entire American continent under Russian rule. The following day, the sixty
conspirators who assassinated Kaiser (labeling themselves as the "Liberators") vacated the Kaiser
Palace and went to barricade the Capitol. The city police are undermanned and was kept occupied in
maintaining the sudden crime wave. Some of the people wanted to attack the Capitol. Some wanted
to leave the city. Some wanted to take advantage of the panic by ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
His father, already deemed incompetent by his nation, died while fighting against the pirates. His
mother left with another man. As for Antony himself, he made a massive debt of 5,000 aurei, which
forced down by his parents. For those who are not yet familiar with Russian economics, one aureus
(golden bill pegged with the price of gold) is equivalent to 25 denarii (silver bills with the price
pegged at the ratio 1:25). Meanwhile, one denarius is equivalent to a day 's wages. To pay off this
debt with a denarius a day, Antony would have to work for more than 300 years. To pay his debt, he
tried to make easy money by doing things like gambling. However, he still ended up in the streets as
a beggar. It was then when he was recruited to join the organized criminal group of General Publius
Klodiy, a man known in the entire country for eliminating his rivals by having them assassinated.
Klodiy 's armed gang is considered a disruptive force in Moscovia. However, as Klodiy 's political
ambitions soared, Antony was able to escape the group, but not without facing a considerable
number of Klodiy 's guards and surviving. While Klodiy did not harbor hard feelings for his
departure, Antony eventually fled to Japan in 1942, a nation annexed by Russia in 1854 but staged a
great revolt in 1922. With Russian control in Japan still loose due to the last revolt, he figured it
would be one of the best places

Analysis Of Shakespeare's The Rape Of Lucrece
Scholarly work on the perennial problem of rape has traditionally placed the blame of perpetuation
on the flaws inherent in patriarchal systems. Some scholars have pointed to the constructed gender
hierarchies of patriarchy as fertile grounds for rape to flourish (Pallotti 218). Shakespeare's The
Rape of Lucrece is often read this way, with an emphasis on how Tarquin's construction of Lucrece's
femininity–as whole and inaccessible–is what motivates his rape (Quay 7). Other scholarship
suggests that gaps in sex crime laws are responsible for the perpetuation of rape (Decker and Baroni
1167). This argument highlights the lack of legislative contrast between The Rape of Lucrece's
setting in ancient Rome, the monarchial republic of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Today, the well–intentioned hyperfocus on consent in rape cases has actually led to a submersion of
agency beneath context or structure (Munro 420). And if the Harvey Weinstein allegations have
taught us anything, it is that consent is still undervalued in contemporary America. Some scholarship
has even claimed that non–consent is valorized by our society (Oliver 4).
With alarming consistency across centuries, sexual and political consent have been limited,
undermined, or generally devalued. In Shakespeare's poem, Lucretia's interactions with her two
servants–one female and one male–serve to expose the paradox of consent: that a servant's consent
is not explicitly valued, yet the very power of his or her master is dependent upon such consent. This
paradox is applicable across patriarchal systems including monarchy and, ironically, republicanism.
In a republic, freeborn–slave or male–female dynamics take the place of the master–servant
relationship portrayed by Lucretia and her servants. I will argue that this paradox of consent is the
basis for the devaluation of consent in The Rape of Lucrece, and by extension in republicanism; and
that this devaluation results in the gender hierarchies, gaps in sex crime laws, and disproportionate
representation that perpetuate rape. The Rape of Lucrece's first significant interaction between
Lucretia and her maid justifies the devaluation of female consent by constructing femininity

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Essay
Lucius Cornelius Sulla From a rather humble beginning Lucius Cornelius Sulla rose to become a
great politician and a powerful general in the Roman Republic. As a general, Sulla lead Roman
armies to many victories. As a politician he became a powerful dictator and yet was responsible for
bringing about many reforms. This essay will prove how he was a great dictator, politician and
general, through discussing his background, his military and political career, his dictatorship, and his
accomplishments in his later years. Sulla was born near Rome, into a politically unimportant
patrician family in 138 B.C. He received a good education and lived a normal life. After his father
died he was forced to live in a run–down ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The following year Sulla ran and was elected as praetor, the second–highest position in the Roman
republic. After his term of praetor was up, he returned to the battle field. This time it was against
Mithridates, King of Pontus. Sulla did not have a full army with him so he had to recruit soldiers
from Roman allies. His ability to get these soldiers and to push Mithridates back, shows his great
military skills. This campaign was also important because it brought Rome into contact with the
powerful Parthia Empire. He was able to arrange a treaty with Parthia, which was a milestone for
Sulla. This would not be the last time he would meet Mithridates in battle. Soon Sulla and Marius
again had to forget there many differences to defend Rome against Allied Italian forces who had
declared war on Rome. They had set up their own government and were preparing to become an
independent nation. This war was known as the Social War because the Latin name for Roman allies
was socii. It was ended by a more important conflict, the invasion of a Roman province in Asia
Minor by Mithridates. The Romans and the Italians signed a peace treaty in 89 B.C. Soon the main
focus for Rome was Mithridates of Pontus in the east. In 88 B.C. Sulla was elected consul. The
Senate also named him commander of the forces against Mithridates. Marius had wanted this
command for himself. After Sulla left Rome Marius convinced the people's assembly to give him

The Rape of Lucretia
The time is the sixth century, the place is Rome and the person is Lucretia, a woman who
contributed to one of the biggest parts of Roman history: the creation of the Roman republic. The
rape of the virtuous Lucretia by Sextus Tarquinius, the son of Tarquinius Superbus' (an Etruscan
king) was the final straw for the Roman people and pushed them to want to change from a monarchy
to a republic. From the accounts of the rape of Lucretia from ancient historians like Livy, Cicero and
Dionysius, it is clear that Lucretias rape not only spurred the roman people to want to get rid of the
Etruscan King and his family, but also revealed the important role of virtue in women in roman
society. There is no doubt that Lucretia, the wife of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sextus saw what he desired and he took it, as his father had done and as Tullia always encouraged.
The rape occurred a couple of days after Collatinus' contest when Sextus went to Collatinus' house,
knowing he was not there, and was welcomed as a guest by Lucretia. Later on, when it was
nighttime and everyone was asleep, Sextus snuck into Lucretias room and tried to seduce her before
he raped her. This was recorded by Livy who writes 'Sextus urged his love, begged her to
submit...used every weapon that might conquer a woman's heart'(101) as well as by Dionysius who
writes that Sextus told Lucretia 'if you will consent to gratify me, I will make you my wife, and with
me you shall reign'(65) After Lucretia rejects all his attempts to seduce her because she would rather
die than be raped and lose her virtue, Sextus turns to manipulation and threatens her virtue by saying
that after he kills her he will lay her body next to that of a dead slaves and tell people that he had
caught her having impure relations with the slave. This would ruin her virtuous image and good
reputation long after her death so Lucretia, who is more threatened by disgrace than by death,
unwillingly submits herself to him. Through these accounts one can see that it is not clear whether
Sextus was in love or merely in lust with Lucretia for he starts declaring his love for her, then tries
to seduce her by telling her everything she

Rome, Pompey The Great And Julius Caesar

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sharon Lee

More from Sharon Lee (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rome, Pompey The Great And Julius Caesar