Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
ROOT CARIES PREVALENCE                                               WILL INCREASE BECAUSE …                              ...
ROOT CARIES                                                                        VS.                                    ...
EXPOSED RESORPTIVE DEFECT                                                 •   hard                                        ...
Root Caries Severity Index of Billings            Root Caries Severity Index of Billings     Grade 1    Grade 2        Gra...
CONTROL STRATEGIES     Remineralization Therapy                                       Remineralization Therapy        High...
RECONTOURING• OBJECTIVE: TO REMOVE SOFT,  CARIOUS DENTIN & PROVIDE A  SMOOTH, NON-RETENTIVE ROOT  SURFACE CAPABLE OF RESIS...
ROOT CARIES                                              ROOT CARIES     RESTORATIVE TREATMENT                            ...
RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENTADVANTAGES                 DISADVANTAGES•   CHEMICAL BOND TO       •   REQUIRES STRICT ...
extension on root surfaces                            extension on root surfaces    extension on root surfaces            ...
FACIALDOVETAIL           10
1                2proximal root concavity(radicular groove)                          11
THE SLOT / CLASS V        COMBINATIONINDICATIONS: WRAPAROUND  ROOT CARIES LESIONS  (SOMETIMES SEEN ON  CROWN MARGINS)     ...
#5-M slot#5-M slot            overhang in proximal            root concavity                                              ...
#3 recurrent caries lesiongold onlay margin                             14
15
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Root caries restoration.07.ppt

9,686 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

Root caries restoration.07.ppt

  1. 1. ROOT CARIES PREVALENCE WILL INCREASE BECAUSE … • PROPORTION OF ELDERLY INCREASING • TEETH BEING RETAINED LATER IN LIFE • GINGIVAL RECESSION INCREASES WITH AGE • XEROSTOMIC MEDICATIONS ARE NUMEROUS ROOT SURFACE RESTORATION8/17/92 11/9/93 12/20/94 4/15/89 11/10/90 CERVICAL BURNOUT• RADIOGRAPHIC ARTIFACT PRODUCED BY A LOCALIZED RELATIVE RADIOLUCENCY• BOUNDED BY CEJ, CREST OF ALVEOLAR BONE, LIP LINE, OR CALCULUS 1
  2. 2. ROOT CARIES VS. CERVICAL BURNOUT • ACQUIRE RADIOGRAPHS WITH GOOD CONTRAST • ASSESS IF BOUNDARIES OF RADIOLUCENCY CORRESPONDS TO ANY ANATOMICAL FEATURES • INSPECT TEETH CLINICALLY TO BACK UP RADIOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION Root Caries Differential Diagnosis Diagnostic Criteria• Soft, Leathery, Tacky Area • Active Root Caries Lesion• at CEJ or on Root Surface • Inactive Root Caries Lesion• Discolored (Varying Degrees) • Exposed Resorptive Defect• Undermines Adjacent Enamel • Root Surface Erosion• Usually Asymptomatic • Root Surface Abrasion • Normal Anatomic Features ROOT CARIES ACTIVE INACTIVE • YELLOW TO BROWN • DARK BROWN TO BLACK • SURFACE DEFECT • SURFACE DEFECT POSSIBLE POSSIBLE • TACKY, LEATHERY • HARD, GLASSY 2
  3. 3. EXPOSED RESORPTIVE DEFECT • hard • rough & irregular • majority of lesion usually subgingival • filled with soft tissue • “pink spot” • more common in anterior teeth • history of trauma • usually asymptomatic • ragged radiographic appearance NORMAL ANATOMIC FEATURES THAT MAY MIMIC ROOT CARIES • ROOT CONCAVITIES AND FURROWS • FURCATIONS • INVAGINATED GROOVES Root Caries Severity Index of Billings Root Caries Severity Index of Billings Grade 1 Grade 1 Grade 2 INCIPIENT INCIPIENT SHALLOWno surface defect surface defect <0.5mm 3
  4. 4. Root Caries Severity Index of Billings Root Caries Severity Index of Billings Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 3 INCIPIENT SHALLOW CAVITATED INCIPIENT SHALLOW CAVITATED PULPAL surface defect >0.5mm carious pulp exposureGrade 1 Grade 2INCIPIENT SHALLOWno surface defect surface defect <0.5mmGrade 3 Grade 3CAVITATED PULPALsurface defect >0.5mm carious pulp exposure 4
  5. 5. CONTROL STRATEGIES Remineralization Therapy Remineralization Therapy High-Intensity Fluoride Treatment Objective: to convert active lesion Xylitol Chewing Gum into inactive lesion and avoid Chlorhexidine invasive procedures Remineralization Rinse Indications: bitewing enamel “notch,” superficial white spot, Grade 1 root surface lesionREMINERALIZATION 0 months REMINERALIZATION 2 monthsOHI, Nyvad & Fejrskov OHI, Nyvad & Fejrskov2 topical NaF, Scand J Dent Res 2 topical NaF, Scand J Dent Res 1986 1986F-dentifrice BID F-dentifrice BIDREMINERALIZATION 6 months REMINERALIZATION 18 monthsOHI, Nyvad & Fejrskov OHI, Nyvad & Fejrskov2 topical NaF, Scand J Dent Res 2 topical NaF, Scand J Dent Res 1986 1986F-dentifrice BID F-dentifrice BID 5
  6. 6. RECONTOURING• OBJECTIVE: TO REMOVE SOFT, CARIOUS DENTIN & PROVIDE A SMOOTH, NON-RETENTIVE ROOT SURFACE CAPABLE OF RESISTING FURTHER CARIOUS ATTACK• INDICATIONS: GRADE 2 (SHALLOW) LESIONS 6
  7. 7. ROOT CARIES ROOT CARIES RESTORATIVE TREATMENT RESTORATIVE DIFFICULTIESOBJECTIVE: TO RESTORE LOST • PERIODONTAL CONCERNS ROOT STRUCTURE, PROTECT THE • ISOLATION PULP, & IMPEDE FURTHER • PULPAL CONCERNS CARIOUS ATTACK • RETENTION • WEAKENING OF TOOTHINDICATIONS: GRADE 3 (CAVITATED) • LATERAL EXTENSION LESIONS & UNESTHETIC SHALLOW • ACCESS LESIONS • VISIBILITY • ANATOMY • RECURRENT CARIES • POST OPERATIVE SENSITIVITY MORTISE & TENON JOINT AMALGAM COMPOSITE RESIN ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES • LOW LONG-TERM • REQUIRES MECHANICAL • CAN BOND TO ENAMEL & • CONTAMINATION BY MICROLEAKAGE RATES RETENTION DENTIN ORAL FLUIDS CAN • MOST TOLERANT (EVEN BONDED) • REQUIRES NO PREVENT BONDING OF MOISTURE • REQUIRES MORTISE FORM MECHANICAL RETENTION • POST OPERATIVE CONTAMINATION • MOISTURE • DOES NOT REQUIRE SENSITIVITY CONTAMINATION REDUCES MORTISE FORM • REQUIRES ACCESS FOR LONGEVITY LIGHT • ESTHETIC • NOT ESTHETIC • BOND TO DENTIN NOT • BONDING REQUIRES AS STRONG AS ENAMEL STRICT ISOLATION 7
  8. 8. RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENTADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES• CHEMICAL BOND TO • REQUIRES STRICT DENTIN ISOLATION• REQUIRES NO • NOT AS ESTHETIC AS MECHANICAL RETENTION COMPOSITE RESIN• REQUIRES NO MORTISE • WEAKER THAN FORM COMPOSITE RESIN• FLUORIDE RELEASE• MODERATE ESTHETICS 8
  9. 9. extension on root surfaces extension on root surfaces extension on root surfaces THE SLOT PREPARATION• view cut wall• extend until decalcification superficial INDICATIONS: PROXIMAL• treat superficial decalcification with ROOT CARIES LESION ON recontouring & remineralization POSTERIOR TOOTH APICAL TO SOUND MARGINAL RIDGE OR ADJACENT TO OTHERWISE SOUND CAST CROWN SLOT PREPARATION AT CEJ FOR AMALGAMPROXIMAL VIEW HORIZONTAL CROSS SECTION BUCCAL VIEW 9
  10. 10. FACIALDOVETAIL 10
  11. 11. 1 2proximal root concavity(radicular groove) 11
  12. 12. THE SLOT / CLASS V COMBINATIONINDICATIONS: WRAPAROUND ROOT CARIES LESIONS (SOMETIMES SEEN ON CROWN MARGINS) 12
  13. 13. #5-M slot#5-M slot overhang in proximal root concavity 13
  14. 14. #3 recurrent caries lesiongold onlay margin 14
  15. 15. 15

×