1. 1.What is the primary idea of the content in the document?
This page says how to duplicate DVD movies.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly rep
resent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
Yes, I do.
These steps use easy English and a little technical terms.
3. What details are included in the document?
How to create duplicated DVD.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
If we access the link page, this page is shown some figures. But, there are no figures in this top page. So,
it is hard to understand the sentence of this site.
And, since there are three ways of the DVD duplicate, we probably take pains to distinguish which ways
we use.
5.About error the writing is good. Because if error occurs user is very troubled.Then this pages become
help with them. And this page is very clear. So, they is very easy.
I am able to understand the writing very easy.
6.Yes, there are. First it is The very first of web Pages. Other are a lot of place.
Pictures, the writing, and links are a little strange, too.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make?
I think there are some people who the DVD-R don't know. So, the author need to explain what the DVD-
R is.
Since we don't know which ways of duplicating the DVD we should use, the author
needs to propose which ways we use.
And, this sentence has hardly the line break, So the author needs to augment the
line break.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how
this author authored it (as you see it in the link).
If we author a document, we would attend that.
We would use the way to emphasize some main points of the document(for example,
changing the font of some key words, or coloring those word).
And, I think the author of the picture is dark, if I were the author, I would up
load the picture the reader never feels dark.