1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles?
Using a cell phone causes driver distraction. Traffic collisions, accidents and near misses are concerns
for all drivers. Since a number of drivers use cell phones while driving, all drivers and passengers are
potentially effected. Getting everyone on board with such a policy requires educating family members
or employees and even installing cell phone software that restricts the use of the devices in cars.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles)
clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind
your comments.
Yes, I do. Because the sentence was short, clear, and simple. Short, clear, and simple sentences are
usually more effective than those which are long and complex. Procedure is written, so it was easy to
understand me. But I want administrator to put a lot of images and figure. This site is able to go
similar article. I think that there are few the image and the list.
3. What details are included in the articles?
Check local laws related to driving while talking on a cell phone and driving while texting. Determine
the extent of your ban. Lay out specific guidelines for the use of cell phones while driving.
Communicate the rules to family members or employees. Install an application on the cell phone that
will restrict its use while driving.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
No, there wasn't.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
The sentence was short, clear, and simple. Short, clear, and simple sentences are usually more
effective than those which are long and complex. In the majority of essays, you should aim for clarity
and simplicity in your written style. Procedure is written, so it was easy to understand me. But I want
administrator to put a lot of images and figure. This site is able to go similar article. There are many
site that it is able to link. And there are references,resources, who can help, photo credit.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
No, there aren't.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make?
The same arguments can be expressed far more clearly and effectively by splitting them up into two
separate and shorter sentences. There are no use made so many same contents. It should write more
difference.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a
similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link).
1.The articles was short. But the sentence of our group was often much too long.
2.The articles was clear. However the sentence of our group wasn't clear.
3.The articles was simple. But the sentence of our group was complicated.