I do not have enough context to summarize the document. The passage provided is a series of short paragraphs that do not clearly connect to each other or present a coherent overall message. Could you please provide more details on the topic or full context of the document being discussed?

1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles? Talking on a cell phone while driving causes impairment on par with drunk driving. Carrying on a conversation takes the driver's full attention away from the road. So use of cell phones while driving must be banned. Getting everyone on board with such a policy requires educating family members or employees and even installing cell phone software that restricts the use of the devices in cars.

2. 2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. In "Reasons for Banning Cell Phone Use When Driving", I do not think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated because "Consequences" sections do not explain consequences. On the other hand, I think there are no problems in "How To Ban The Use of Cell Phones in Cars".

3. 3. What details are included in the articles? The article represents the danger of the use of the cell phones with you drive the car. And, it explains why it is dangerous to use the cell phones with you drives the car. If you use a hands-free headset, it becomes possible. This article shows consequences of banning cell phones use when driving.

4. 4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it? The article shows the danger of the use of the cellular phone with you drive the car but, the concrete penal regulations is not shown. With this, the violation occurs without taking it too seriously. The article should write the concrete penal regulations. Then, this article will be more comprehensible.

5. 5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good? It is important at all for oneself to write something because it is easy to have it for memory. Because the reason is that you can memorize it by two means with right your hands and look eyes.

6. 6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected? There are errors that need to be corrected. Businesses should communicate cell phone driving ban policies to employees from the very start of their employment and revisit the information during ongoing training. Set disciplinary policies for violations of the ban. Teenagers may risk having their cell phones taken away. Employees may risk termination after repeated violations.

7. 7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make? I will suggest that following. I think it is good when the difference of the rate of accident whether the cellular phone being used to show how dangerous it is to use the cellular phone while driving while calling or not existing is shown as a graph. As a result, I think that you may transmit danger to a lot of people. It is not significant not to understand whether the person who has gotten on is a dangerous thing in telling only to the driver, too. I think that it is important to tell danger to people in the large range as much as possible of use while driving because I hang to the discretion of the individual in installing the application program of the limitation.

8. 8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link). First, an effect by the sight is not enough, I add an image and an animation . Second, I make an entry big a little more and think it to make it plain. Third, when I did not understand that there are simple questions and answers, I think good.

9. 8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link). First, an effect by the sight is not enough, I add an image and an animation . Second, I make an entry big a little more and think it to make it plain. Third, when I did not understand that there are simple questions and answers, I think good.