A Christian Explanation Of Moral Conscience

A Christian Explanation Of Moral Conscience
Before we look at how the Christian traditions view conscience, one must understand the theory of
early psychologists such as Sigmund Freud. The most common misunderstanding is confusing the
meaning of moral conscience in religion and philosophy, with the psychological meaning of the
superego (Smith, 60). Small children differentiate right from wrong by learning what behaviours
cause authority figures to act the way they do (Curran, 40). For example, if a child upsets their
mother or father, the child begins to experience shame and guilt. Ultimately, children do not fear the
consequence, but rather fear being rejected, abandoned, or losing love from an authority figure
(Curran, 40). Children experience the echo of the superego or authority ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As we grow up, the voice of authority still remains in our heads. Therefore, the most common
misunderstanding is that moral conscience is not a "separate faculty of the mind," referring to the
superego and conscience being connected or seen as the same entity (Curran, 130). As young
children, we follow our superego simply because we fear betrayal from authorative figures,
especially parents, but as we grow up we develop our own conscience that helps us distinguish right
from wrong. Moral conscience is one's inner sense of what is intrinsically right and wrong, which
lead to moral actions (Curran, 41). Moral conscience allows us to make decision on behalf of
ourselves and our own person values. We must see conscience as an ongoing journey of constant
assessment and judgement, rather than an authorative voice echoing in our head, like Freud believed
(Curran, 130). In the case of moral conscience, our actions reflect our values as unique individuals.
The conscience distinguishes what God is calling us to do, from what the superego or authority is
telling us to do (Curran, 41). A mature Christian conscience would pose the question of, "What is
the wise and holy thing to do?"(Curran,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Everyman Is A Morality Play
Everyman is a morality play that was written in the late fifteenth–century, by an unknown author. It
is unknown who originally wrote the play. It has been said that maybe Monks and Priests of that
time wrote these types of plays. Therefore, it is believed that the play was probably written by
multiple people. Morality plays were written to show people how they should act in the eyes of God
and how the way they live their lives will affect them after death. Everyman seeks to persuade the
audience that the only way to get into heaven when they pass, is to be a good person and to do good
deeds for others. The author of Everyman wants the audience to understand that the way they live
their lives is how they will be judged by death. The play ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everyman has a very clear moral message. People choosing goods over good deeds. Foneska (2007)
states that the character of Everyman is a universal representation of the human race and is obsessed
with his physical appearance and money. Everyman is a sinner who has turned his back on God.
(pg.1) Ryan (1995) says that Everyman sets out to show that charity is the highest of all virtues, and
that caring for the sick and poor by the people who have riches was the ticket to salvation and
eternal life (1995). Everyman is obsessed with becoming richer and gaining more material things.
God has become fed up with mankind and decides to send Death to teach them a lesson:
"GOD:
I perceive, her in my majesty, How that all creatures be to me unkind, Living without dread in
worldly prosperity: Of ghostly sight the people be so blind, Drowned in sin, they know me not for
their God: In worldly riches is all their mind, They fear not my righteousness, the sharp rod. My law
that I showed, when I for them died, They forget clean, and shedding of my blood red; I hanged
between two, it cannot be denied; To get them life I suffered to be dead; I healed their feet, with
thorns hurt was my head. I could do no more than I did, truly; And now I see the people do clean
forsake me: They use the seven deadly" (lines 25–35)
God summons Death and tells him to prepare Everyman for his death.
DEATH:

Moral Decision-Making Among Catholic Christian
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose In today's society, there are many ways to make moral decisions, being
religious or secular. This ethnographic report will cover the importance of moral decision making
for Catholic Christians, in particular about the ethical issue of abortion. 1.2 Hypothesis In order to
investigate moral decision making among Catholics, the following hypothesis will be explored:
"When it comes to moral decision making, a Catholic Christian is likely to be guided by moral
authorities such as conscience, natural law and the Teachings of the Catholic Church, in particularly
making a moral decision about abortion." 2.0 Review of Literature 2.1 Moral teaching of
Catholicism about how to make a good moral decision Moral teachings of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Turning to the teachings of the Catholic Church was also a part of the decision making process for
both interviewees. Carmen, interviewee one, explained that as a Catholic Christian, she does believe
in the teachings of Jesus and the Catholic Church and refers to them when making moral decisions.
She explained that "Jesus was a compassionate person and would have thought of others when
making his choices." Carmen discussed that she would like to reflect what Jesus did in her actions
and decisions as she wants to resemble a compassionate person. Lauryn, the second interviewee,
explained that she also believed that the Bible and Church teachings provide guidance in her moral
decision making. She talked about, through her spiritual journey, she has come to learn that how you
interpret the Bible can be different for everyone. She explained when she makes decisions she thinks
to herself 'What would Jesus do?' This reflects the research conducted as Catholics find that
meaning and hope in Jesus Christ, whom God the Father has sent into the world for the salvation of
all peoples and The Church offers to all people the possibility of encountering the living God today
and finding in him lasting meaning and

Personal Narrative: I Am Pilot Knob
Recently, I hiked around Pilot Knob with my father and a friend. Though the view of the
surrounding land was gorgeous, my attention was captivated by the knob itself. Staring upward in
awe, I marveled at the unique rock structure. One area was rough and cracked from centuries of tree
roots and ice expanding cracks. Another was polished smooth and curved from the wind. Reflecting
back to that hike I realize that I am Pilot Knob. Over time I have been shaped and worn by various
events, choices, and individuals. Some have polished my character and identity smooth. Others have
chipped away at the outside. Over time a beautiful formation has emerged. Today, my thoughts and
identity are formed through three aspects of my character and life, my inquisitive ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
A moral code guides my actions and thoughts. Before committing an act I review my ethics. As a
Christian my morals stem from my religion. In life I strive to be selfless, kind, patient, considerate,
and loving. These traits form my identity and my life goal is to mold my character to reflect these
traits. Morals and religion also provide my purpose in life, assisting others whenever possible.
Purpose drives my thoughts and cause me to envision actions that help others. Ethics and religion
also provide the bulk of my identity. My value is cemented inside religion. Identity is formed by
entwining purpose, morals, and personality. Identity needs to be tethered to a firm foundation or else
my life will lose stability and I will feel that I fall short of expectations. Accomplishments and the
approval of others shift like sand in a strong breeze. These foundations are never constant. Therefore
I strive to detach my identity from such sources to avoid emotional turmoil. In my life, religion and
morals are the only stable foundation. No matter what hardship, change, or dilemma I face, I can
lean into this foundation for support. My identity remains stable when cemented into these ideals.
My church small group has reinforced this decision through encouragement and guidance. There I
have ascertained that my identity is not my failures, reputation, or awards. My identity is who I am
when adhering to my ethic code.

Traditional Utilitarianism. According To Our Text,...
Traditional Utilitarianism According to our text, utilitarianism is a general term for "any view that
holds that actions and policies should be evaluated based on the benefits and costs they will impose
on society" (Velasquez, 2012). In any circumstance, the "right" activity or approach is the one that
will create the best net advantages or the most reduced net costs (when all options have just net
expenses). Furthermore, utilitarianism rule holds that any activity is morally right if and just if the
aggregate results of a similar demonstration are more than the results created by some other activity
a specialist could have done in its place. As indicated by utilitarianism just a single activity is ideal
in the last examination: the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In any case, customary utilitarians would preclude that an activity from securing a specific kind is
dependably either right or off–base. Rather, each activity would need to be measured given its
specific conditions. Utilitarian perspectives have additionally been exceedingly powerful in
financial aspects. A long line of business analysts, starting in the nineteenth century, contended that
monetary conduct could be clarified by expecting that individuals dependably endeavor to amplify
their utility and that the utilities of products can be measured by the costs individuals will pay for
them.
Ecological Ethic Ecological ethics is the moral view that nonhumans parts of the earth should be
saved for their own purpose, paying little mind to whether this gives individuals advantages.
Additionally, we people have an obligation to not hurt them without adequately genuine reasons.
There are a few assortments of biological morals, some more radical and expansive than others. The
most famous form asserts that, notwithstanding individuals, different creatures have natural esteem
and are meriting our regard and security. A few utilitarians, for example, Peter Singer, for instance
have claimed that agony is a shrewdness whether it is incurred on people or on individuals from
different species. Moreover, Singer contends that the torment experienced by a

Christian Moral Vision Of Communication
4.4.3. Moral Vision of Communication
Christian moral vision of communication one is standing in the field of moral theology looking at
the horizon of communication. Accordingly, the focus of a Christian moral vision of communication
is twofold. It addresses the moral dimensions of communication practise and policy–making within
the Church; and it addresses the ethical issues affecting human communications in general. That
communication is a basic human right and, as such, the Christian seeks to establish a pattern of
communication in which the free, creative expressions of the person is recognised, respected and
invited. It is recognition that every person is an active participant in building a culture. In this
instance, the Christian Churches

Moral And Ethical Characteristics Of Jesus Christ And...
Biblical Perspective
Christian leadership infused with a profound ethical standard will set leaders, followers, and
organizations apart. The Bible provides a substantial amount of moral and ethical leadership
examples and principles that are applicable to modern ethical leadership development (see Table 2).
This directive encourages an ethical example for leaders proclaiming, "Show yourself in all respects
to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity, and sound speech that
cannot be condemned..." (Titus 2:7–8, English Standard Version). Thompson (2010) believes leaders
should be developed ethically to be "action–oriented leaders who recognize the moral importance of
their decisions as moral agents" (p. 29).
The leadership style of Jesus Christ throughout his mission incorporated ethical and moral
components that were often taught to the disciples and early church leaders through parables. Jesus
led a spiritual and social movement that transformed this world and life after death (Gary, 2008).
Contemporary leaders are guiding organizations and followers to and through ethical and unethical
challenges on a much smaller scale than Jesus, however, what a greater example of an ethical leader
and how to develop others, than Christ himself. There are quite a few ethical leadership
characteristics that Christ and the early church leaders modeled. The brief list below is not intended
to be exhaustive, yet, to illustrate that the ethical values represented

Ram 's Morality And Morality
Cullen Lemieux
Period 2
World literature
Mr. Neely
Ram's Morality Many people struggle or debate over the topic of morality, and many people are
mistaken as to who really judges what is moral or immoral. The only person who can decide
whether an act is morally right or wrong is God. Within Slumdog Millionaire, there are many
actions and ideas that can be considered morally good or morally bad according to the Christian
views of morality. Ram Muhammad Thomas is debated over when it comes to the topic of Christian
moral views. He shows aspects of both sides in the moral boundary. Within Slumdog Millionaire
Ram shows that he is an immoral person through his thoughts, actions, and motives. Morality is
often referred to as decision–making and the difference between right and wrong. There are many
aspects to Christian morality such as the practice of freedom, the understanding of moral acts, the
formation of conscience, and above all realization of sin. Additionally, when referring to the practice
of freedom when it pertains to the topic of morality, it is usually talking about the responsibility that
is gained to be created in the image and likeness of God ("Morality"). In order to practice
responsible freedom we must do things that would keep us in a more intimate relationship with God,
such as going to church and getting baptized ("Morality"). When God created us he gave us the
knowledge so we may choose to act "good" and ultimately share in his plan ("Morality"). Freedom
is

The Importance Of English Literature
High school has been my most treasurable experience so far; a time where I have learnt about a
range of topics and developed the skills to view things from a personal perspective. For this, I owe a
great thanks to all my English teachers; especially Mrs Hinds, who is here with us today and Mrs
Lyndon, who helped prepare us for our final stretch of school. While preparing for this speech, when
I read the assessments from the past two years, it surprised me to realise how much I had missed the
point of each of the tasks. Only now while nearing the end this twelve–year part of my life, have I
realised the importance of each individual topic. I realised that no other subject has delved into such
a range of diverse matters from the present and past. Just as in Harper Lee's quote from 'To Kill a
Mockingbird': "People generally see what they look for and hear what they listen for". What I
missed were the fascinating features of our culture, encapsulated in varying English literature; which
of course, were obvious when studying the works of Shakespeare or of the Romantic poets of the
eighteenth and nineteenth century. But only after my interest in the subject spiked was I able to
understand that I was missing deeper aspects hidden within all types of literature. [linking sentence]
A form of literature I used to enjoy in its most meaningless state was music. Without giving it a
second thought, I used to view music as empty entertainment until we analysed a song and poem for
'The Beat

Is Okonkwo Honorable
Was Okonkwo an Honorable man? What does it mean to be honorable? To be honorable is defined
as someone doing something that is right, truthful and moral. Also that person will be very well
respected by others around them. In his early life Okonkwo was a great man who had a high
reputation and was well respected by others. He had already own two titles to his name was a great
wrestler and warrior in Umuofia, but as his life went on he became less respected and was known
for being dishonorable. He did many things that made him dishonorable such as being an abusive
towards his family and having no regards for the tribe's laws. He also killed his own son and a
messenger of the church. But one of the most dishonorable things he did was killed himself.
Okonkwo was dishonorable for many reasons. One of those reasons is that Okonkwo was an abusive
man and would beat his family if they angered him. When Okonkwo found that his son Nwoye had
converted into Christian, he gripped his son's throat and started to choke him. The only reason he
stopped was because his uncle told him to. Another example is when one of his wives Ojiugo was
not home in time to cook him food, he beaten her heavily. These examples show that Okonkwo is
not honorable because someone who is honorable is morally right and abusing your family is not
moral. What makes him more dishonorable is that he "was not a man to stop beating someone half–
way through, not even for fear of a goddess" (pg30), Okonkwo had beaten

The Divine Command Theorist Approach
Making decisions can be easy at times when it does not require much thought; however, it can be
complicated, especially when it involves people 's lives. If, for instance, there is a boat holding
seventy–five people but it should only hold fifty in order to ensure the safety of the passengers and
lessen the risk of the boat sinking, who will be asked to leave the boat? There are also one hundred
individuals in the water whose lives must be considered; what can be done in a tight situation such
as this one where time is not in your hands? It is important to remember only fifty people can be
saved while one hundred and twenty–five individuals might die. This can prove to be a strenuous
and gut–wrenching challenge. There are several different ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In this situation this theory would suggest to do what is just, but overall what God believes to be
right. According to this theory, God believes that the people on the boat as well as those in the water
should not be left to die. The people on the boat cannot morally abandon the rest and leave them to
die. A divine command theorist pays very close attention to every person on the boat as well as the
those in the water. Overall, the individual will make a decision based on what is thought to be good
by God despite not establishing what is wrong or right, as mentioned by Plato, making it debatable
(Vaughn 17). Since divine theorists view the Ten Commandments as God's morals codes, it is
suggested by such theorist that by choosing to leave a great amount of the individuals behind, it is
immoral; God says individuals shall help their neighbor. With this information, there comes a time
in which God, himself, has to make these types of decisions, and by believing in him, a divine
theorist will unfortunately sacrifice some people, but not without saving as many people as they
possibly can. While doing what is thought to be right by God, they will, nonetheless, leave
individuals behind and essentially, commit murder, which can be seen as a controversial dilemma. In
one way or another, they are somehow going to take an action that leads to an immoral result. Not
everyone will be saved without risking

Dirty Money : Corporations And Crake
Dirty Money: Corporations in Oryx and Crake In the words of Theodore Roosevelt, "To educate a
person in the mind but not in morals is to educate a menace to society". Yet, as humans, we all too
often forget our own histories, sacrificing morality in order to walk the precarious path towards
scientific progress. In Oryx and Crake, written by Margaret Atwood, corporations are elevated to a
status that transcends governance, in an ever increasing search of profit. In the process, the younger
generation is scarred, forcing them to grow up in a society that does not value morals. Through
placing the importance of profit above a widening class divide, and causing the disappearance of
personal freedoms, corporations cause the moral downfall of society in Oryx and Crake.
The first example of how morality is disregarded can be found in a central theme of the novel,
which is the importance of profit. It is because of this influence, that there are no limits as to what
can be sold, leading to an abundance of morally corrupting products and services: "The locations
were supposed to be countries where life was cheap and kids were plentiful, and where you could
buy anything you wanted." (Atwood 108). Through constant exposure to such content, especially at
a young age, the characters are instilled with a misguided picture of what a normal world should be.
As a result, a proper moral compass is never developed, affecting their actions. Furthermore, the
importance of money not only taints

Doing The Right Thing By Chuck Colson
After watching the various videos for the Biblical world view assignment, I have found several
aspects that are very interesting to me. The first video "Doing the Right Thing" by Chuck Colson
grabbed my attention in several ways. First are the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr "It is our
moral responsibly to resist unjust law" (Doing the Right Thing Group Bible study by Charles
Colson, Brit Hume – Trailer, 2012). I have always thought that just because something was a law
did not make it morally right. I firmly believe as the speakers in the Colson video pointed out that
the government should operate under moral law. Another thing that really stuck with me was Dr.
Ravi's talk with an Islamic leader he spoke about in his lecture in the "How do you know
Christianity is the one true world view" video. He said that the Islamic leader stated, "It's time we in
the Islamic world stopped asking if Jesus died on the cross and started asking why he died on the
cross" (Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, 2012). I find it wonderful and uplifting to know that
God is working in the hearts and minds of Muslims. To know what is right morally we as Christians
should develop a Biblical worldview. A biblical worldview is one that states that God exists, he
created everything in the universe and still watches over that universe now. The Bible is absolute
moral truth and Jesus lived a perfect sinless life. He died on the cross for mankind's sins and the gift
of salvation cannot be

Abortion : The Morality Of Abortion
One of the most frequently debated topics in bioethics is the morality of abortion, or the ending of a
pregnancy without physically giving birth to an infant. Often times abortions are categorized into
either spontaneous, a natural miscarriage; induced or intentional, which is premeditated and for any
reason; or therapeutic, which albeit intentional, its sole purpose is to save the mother's life. It seems
however that moral conflicts on issue mainly arise when discussing induced abortions. In general,
people universally agree it is morally wrong to kill an innocent person and in some people's eyes
induced abortions are the intentional killings of innocent persons, thus making them immoral.
However not all individuals view fetuses as persons and consequentially argue it is not morally
wrong to kill them. From these two notions stems three basic views, or platforms, individuals use as
the backbone for their argument when making their case for the right or wrongness of abortion.
Conservatives believe under no circumstance is it morally acceptable to perform an abortion.
Liberals believe abortions are permissible at any time during pregnancy and for any reason. Lastly,
moderates stand behind the notion that abortions are morally permissible in some situations but not
all. Over time hundreds of philosophers have attempted to justify their view point with sound
theories; three of which, Don Marquis, Michael Tooley and Judith Thomson, seem to have done so
successfully. On the

Inherit The Wind Moral Analysis
Morals are everywhere in the movie Inherit The Wind and in everyday life. Morals are always
changing and there are different kinds of beliefs everywhere. Merriam– Webster describes morals
being of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior and a belief as a state or habit of
mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing. Beliefs and morals go hand in
hand when you think about it. Each one of the billions of people on this earth has different morals
depending on who they and where they are. Our morals are challenged every day and we, ourselves,
question them every hour of the day if they are right or wrong; should we defend our morals or
change them?. In the movie characters beliefs are challenged and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When put to trial his beliefs are put to the test and at one point he was willing to give up. In the end,
Cate's stood his ground and fought for what he believed in. When Cate's is said to be guilty he
responds "I've been convicted of violating an unjust law. I will continue in the future as I have in the
past to oppose this law in any way I can." He once wavered but now he stood for what he believed
in becoming strong with his morals. Challenges for morals were very high in the movie, especially
for dear young Rachel. She believed her morals were just like her father's the priest of the town but
wanted to help her lover, Cates, despite his opposite beliefs. She admits in the movie that she fears
her father, later in the film he damns her to hell for associating with Cates. She fears if Cates doesn't
follow everyone else's beliefs she'll lose him, so she tells him to basically follow the townspeople
like a good little sheep so they don't get more in trouble. Through the rest of the movie, she battles
herself of what she believes in almost losing it. At the end, she comes to grasp herself and figures
out what she wants. She became a stronger person now that she knows her own morals letting go of
her fear of her cursing damnation father. She finally finds what her own morals are not what other's
want her to believe in as she stands with her lover proud. We fight, but truly, who is right we only
know that we have different

Moral Revelation Theme
Moral revelation and redemption seems to be the focus of Flannery O'Connor's theme in A Good
Man is Hard to Find, Revelation, and Everything that Rises Must Converge. O'Connor's upbringing
stemmed from southern roots with a strong religious foundation from which she seems to center her
short stories. Although she is a master at integrating different themes throughout her stories, her dark
comedic style of writing allows her to question one's ability to live a good, proper Christian life,
without inducing hatred or bigotry. O'Connor often questions her characters' ethics, morals, and how
aware they are spiritually. She brings to light the sinful lives many live by interjecting a condemning
or judgmental attitude. She does however, infer ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mrs. Turpin, a professed "saved" Christian, is quite judgmental, prejudice, and has an inconsistent
view of Christianity. She is critical of those she vies as below her economic status as less than she.
The revelation she receives comes from Mary Grace, a young girl Mrs. Turpin has heavily judged.
The girl's name is a symbol O'Connor uses as a symbol of good as opposed to the bad ethics Mrs.
Turpin displays. The physical eye contact and focus Mary Grace had on Mrs. Turpin was a symbol
of Mary Grace helping Mrs. Turpin reach redemption. Again, as in the other two short stories,
O'Connor allows the characters an option of seeking redemption. Mrs. Turpin had the option of
facing her judgmental falsities, by looking Mary Grace in the eye, or not choosing to r4ealize and
change her behavior, by looking away from Mary

The Hidden Meaning of The Nun's Priest's Tale Essay
The Hidden Meaning of The Nun's Priest's Tale
It has been suggested that a "Chaucer tale exploits the nature of its genre but also draws attention to
the ideological biases and exclusions inherent in the genre"2. In my opinion The Nun's Priest's Tale
is a wonderful example of Chaucer testing the bounds of his chosen genre – in this case the beast
fable.
What is a beast fable? Obviously a tale about animals, but one where "animals are used as
embodiments or caricatures of human virtues, vices, prudences, and follies ... and the other typical
qualities of mankind. They are generally brief cautionary anecdotes that use the obvious
resemblances between man and animals to point a moral or push a proverb home entertainingly"3. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Beast fables offer the most closed system of stereotypes available to a storyteller."4 But
stereotypes, by their nature, are biased, exclusive, overblown representations of humanity – perhaps
not useful for gaining a better understanding of a working system of morality. Certainly once
Chaucer has introduced a level of non–stereotypical complexity to the tale, one simple, obvious
moral is no longer possible, which raises a significant doubt about how useful it is to try and make
moral points through such tales. Life is, after all, never one dimensional.
It is for this reason that I think Chaucer is drawing attention to two types of biases and exclusions in
The Nun's Priest's Tale. He examines those within popular medieval traditions through the
introduction of sub–genres which conflict with the apparent simplicity of the tale. By doing this he
also exposes those of the beast fable form, which are largely made apparent through the multiplicity
of (often conflicting) morals that the introduction of the sub–genres create. In this essay I will
explore how these two ideas intersect.
The Sub–genres: Popular Medieval Traditions
It has been suggested that "the Nun's Priest's Tale does not so much make true and solemn assertions
about life as it tests truths and solemnities"5. In my opinion there are three main sub–genres that
Chaucer 'tests' in the tale. The Romance, with its emphasis on nobility and

Communities Rights to Enforce Moral Conviction through Law
Canada: a nation built, politically, on the rights accompanied by being a democratic state. A
democracy, in the simplest of terms, states that a society has the right to vote in laws, political
leaders and bring other social justice issues up to the head of their political hierarchy. To suggest
that a society should not have any right to enforce its moral convictions through the law would be
morally unsound in a country that prides itself on equality and democracy. In this essay I will be
arguing against the idea stated above: the notion that a community should not be able to have their
laws reflected in the value and morals of their people. To support this opinion, I will be drawing
points from Wil Waluchow's The Concept of a Moral ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is why it is necessary for a society to set laws based on the general moral convictions they hold.
Communities are based on a general consensus for what is morally sound and what is completely
unjust. If a community of individuals cannot come to a general agreement of what is right and what
is wrong, these is going to be conflict and the society will, naturally, spilt into smaller communities
with people who carry the same principles. This is called the Disintegration Thesis (Callaghan,
2014). Imagine a group of people living in a small community. For this community to function, they
must all have the same mentality about specific ideas. If half the community does not want to eat
meat and the other half only wants to eat meat, the group would eventually split into two separate
societies. Because of this, Devlin has come to the conclusion that every society has the right to
implement morals, in both a personal and political sense, so that each society does not disintegrate
(Callaghan, 2014). An example of the Disintegration Thesis in society is that of Sudan. Again, I will
be using the topic of religion and it's moral implications. Sudan is ruled by Arabic Muslims, but at
the time of it splitting, the in the Southern area of Sudan, the people either followed Christian beliefs
or another religion, but not Arabic Muslims. The religious differences lead to many moral conflicts
and,

Eliot 's Argument For Moral Judgement
In order to fully understand Eliot's statement, it would be helpful to locate the statement in Eliot's
essay and then speculate its meaning within its context. Right before the quoted passage, Eliot
writes, "if were agreed as to what we meant by wisdom, by the good life for the individual and for
society, we should apply moral judgements to poetry as confidently as did Johnson" (Eliot 212). It
seems Eliot implies that Johnson is confident about his moral judgement because there is a
consensus in society on what is right and what is wrong. Consequently, when Johnson reads a text, it
is relatively easy for him to judge the morality of this work, whereas Eliot's time is "an age in which
no two writers need agree about anything" (Eliot 212). For this reason, Eliot laments that readers in
his age must endeavor to "discount [the] attraction or repulsion" of "the ideas, as well as the
personality of the author" (Eliot 212). Yet in Johnson's age, the relatively homogenous value system,
Eliot believes, frees Johnson from the struggle to dissociate the work from the author's idea. Johnson
can simply disregard the author and weighs the text against the commonly accepted value, as Eliot
says, "what interests Johnson is the edifying power of the poem, rather than the deliberate intention
of the poet" (Eliot, 212). In other words, Eliot portrays Johnson as an disinterested critic who is only
interested in how a text reflects the commonly accepted morality. In this sense, Johnson is able

Character Analysis Of Charlotte Douglas
Surprisingly, I found myself liking Charlotte Douglas from Didion's novel more than any of the
other characters that we have read so far. Grace's initial analysis of Charlotte as someone who
merely dreams their life left me with the impression that she was not going to be a character I would
relate to or even remotely identify with. As the book went on, Charlotte grew on me more and more.
I loved how mysterious behaviors such as her frequent visits to the airport were explained early on
in the book as a mere vehicle for socialization, masquerading, and entertainment, leaving the reader
to view her with a certain degree of disdain. Later in the book, the reader begins to realize that
Charlotte is possibly using the airport as a means of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Churchgoing Christian men are convinced they are on a moral crusade to violently put an end to the
convent in Ruby only through a series of misunderstandings that lead them to believe that mass
abortions and witchcraft are occurring in the confines of their town. Even though readers will not
often particularly like many characters in the novels they read, insights can absolutely be gained
from them.
The differing styles in approaching perspectives in their storytelling between Didion and the
combination of Boyle and Morrison have significant effects on each of their stories. Didion chooses
to provide her story through the use of a singular narrator, while Boyle and Morrison choose to offer
multiple perspectives. At no point did I feel like my involvement in A Book of Common Prayer was
affected negatively by the use of a singular narrator. By only introducing the reader to Grace's point
of view, the reader is able to fully immerse themselves in the allure of Charlotte Douglas's character
and Grace's fascination with her. The reader is able to see their own opinion of Charlotte change just
as Grace's does when she is provided with new information about her character. Had Didion's novel
been from multiple perspectives, it likely would have been a vastly more political novel, with the
tensions of Marin, Antonio, Gerardo, and Victor's characters being highlighted. The singular
perspective of A Book of Common Prayer allows for more impetus to be put

Nietzsche on Slave Morality Essay
"Nietzsche on Judeo–Christian Morality" In Nietzsche's aphorisms 90–95 and 146–162 he attacks
what he believes to be the fundamental basis of the "slave" morality prevalent in the Judeo–
Christian tradition as well as other religions and societies. From the beginning, he distinguishes the
two different types of moralities he believes to exist: the "master morality", created by rulers of
societies, and the "slave" morality, created by the lowest people in societies. The former stresses
virtues of the strong and noble while looking down upon the weak and cowardly. This type of
morality, however, is not as widespread as the "slave morality" that has been adopted by so many
religions. Nietzsche looks through the psychology and logic of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Is this "slave morality" really a divine gift from God, or is it just the moral code we expect to come
from a historically persecuted lower people? This brings up a big question over the validity of "slave
morality", as it seems to only exist for protection of the lower people, not for what's truly good and
evil. Also, as Nietzsche brings up, its validity comes from the existence of a God who gave us these
morals, something that cannot be proven, so naturally the concept of "faith" and trusting and
believing in these morals and the God who created them would be a prime virtue, and those without
it viewed as "evil" or "lost". Nietzsche also brings up a good point in that this morality that comes
from historically persecuted people serves to "tame" men and call it an "improvement", which he
sees as a bad joke. He believes that this taming reduces our instinctive "beast" and makes us weaker
creatures. He questions if we have really grown more "moral" over time or if it is just the result of
mankind becoming, frankly, bigger "wusses". This made me think of movies like Fight Club and
Deliverance in that in both movies men seem to be so tame and it is shown to be against our nature.
Fight Club in particular focuses on this release of beastliness and return to what is believed to be the
way mankind was intended to live. The last critique Nietzsche makes is also one of

A Good Man Is Hard To Find Essay examples
Flannery O'Connor's short story collection A Good Man is Hard to Find has many elements of a
southern gothic work. Images of ancient castles with sliding panels create suspicious themes and
settings that lead the readers into the dark and gloomy world of the southern United States. With all
of the violence, horror, and dismal surroundings presented in O'Connor's stories there is too a moral
message given. Later gothic work did not always explain horror like this, holding little moral value
to contrast their grotesque images (notes, November 1). O'Connor's stories do include a strong moral
element, frequently in the form of religious explanations. The characters within A Good Man is Hard
to Find are usually ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If Sammy is not a good man is he evil? Could he represent Satan, Red Sammy is a fitting parallel
name. Sammy then states that "a good man is hard to find." Could this be forewarning to
the grandmother's confused values of what is right or wrong (good or bad)?
Soon the family is on their way again but the grandmother forces her way by using the children.
Getting the kids exited enough to annoy their father so much that he breaks down and changes the
route and seeks out the old gothic house. We soon learn that the grandmother has made a
geographical mistake thinking Georgia for Tennessee. Her ignorance starts a chain of events which
will result in all their deaths: Brining the cat along even though she knew it wold not be allowed,
forcing her will even when unsure if it was right (O'Connor, 2, 11). The grandmother's uncertainty
of geography could be read as mirroring her spiritual uncertainty.
After the car crashes we see that the grandmother is self–serving. She uses gender roles ("you
wouldn't shoot a woman") and religious images to try and save herself and to make the Misfit
to look well upon her (O'Connor, 14–19). This plea seems very self–serving. Why not ask–
"you wouldn't shoot a family, would you?" The argument of religion as a reason to be
good is rejected by the Misfit (O'Connor, 21). By dismissing Christ's history the Misfit also rejects
the grandmother's self–serving values.

Why Should We Consider Morally Right Or Wrong?
There have been many debates on what to consider morally right or wrong. These deliberations,
however, are largely influenced by our own understanding developed through our cultural
backgrounds, the way in which we were raised, as well as the experiences we have gathered over
time. Different people have different moral views, but those do not decide what should be right or
wrong. Nonetheless, there are actions that can be determined objectively and universally as morally
right or wrong, provided that Divine or Natural Law acts as reason to direct these inclination.
Natural Law is a system of just principles aligned with that of our nature and God. One such
principle is, "Good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided," (Crito, 49d). Even though
this principle is divine and universal – because men inclination should be directed by reason– they
are not justly hold in common by all humans. One reason for this is that not all humans believe in
Natural or Divine Law. They do not believe that there is a code of ethics established that exceeds
that of Human Law. Even though, the content of Human Law emphasizes this principle. For
example, if one commits murder, they will be prosecuted. Moreover, there are some people who do
recognize the existence of a Divine Law, but are unaware of whether it applies to them, or they are
blinded by societal mores. This is why in Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter," he points out the
importance of the thermometer and the thermostat. This

The Importance Of JesusMoral Authority In The Church
Whilst I think that Jesus' divine authority has a significance importance for Christians, I think that
Jesus' moral authority is more important because of its larger relevance to society. Some of Jesus'
moral teachings are still relevant in non–religious communities are therefore this is more important
than divine authority because it has had a more significant effect on the world that his divine
authority which is mostly limited to those of the Christian faith.
Even though many people argue about the existence of Jesus as a religious figure, most people will
acknowledge that there was a historical Jesus who was a teacher of wisdom. Wittgenstein saw Jesus
as an authoritative figure not because of his divinity but because of his attitude towards life and
humanity. Wittgenstein praised Jesus for living an honest life and argued that it was this that was
more important because this approach changed the way that people lived then and has continued to
change the way people live now. Tolstoy agrees with Wittgenstein suggesting that it was Jesus' Five
moral commandments that made Jesus' life notable, and not his divinity. I agree with this idea that
Jesus was a teacher of wisdom, and has a great impact on changing the way in which people
thought. This is something that continues to this day and therefore I think that this has greater
importance than his divine authority.
Alternatively, some argue that it is Jesus' high Christology and the relationship that Jesus' has with
God,

Moral Relativism: A Christian World View
"Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular
standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely
privileged over all others." (Westacott, 2017) Moral relativism is a belief and worldview that states
that the individual is the source of what is real and true and that there is no absolute truth in the
world. Meaning no religion or way of life is absolutely right and can dictate what is morally sound
behavior. Essentially this removes responsibility from ourselves to do what is morally right and
allows us to act in a way that satisfies ourselves or meets what our own view of what is morally
right says. This worldview states that everyone's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The easiest place to see this is in social media and art today. Judgment of how others think and act
has become a moral crime and there is no place for accountability or correction. This becomes my
out when I wish to justify my actions even when I know they are wrong. This mindset is not hard to
find in today's society as many have adopted this way of thinking to almost ignore the problems
around them and focus on themselves. However, the benefit of this movement has been the
expanding accepting of tolerance. Historically speaking, tolerance is a key to peace and was
modeled by Jesus Christ during His

A good man is hard to find analysis
3/4/12
"A Good Man is Hard to Find" Analysis
EN 102
In the short story "A Good Man is Hard to Find" the author, Flannery O'Connor communicates
literary symbols and prominence of Southern culture. Within the story, there are subtle yet important
details that make the entirety of the piece as iconic as it is. The reoccurring theme of being a lady
and moral codes both are important to the overall concept of the story. The unnamed grandmother in
"A Good Man Is Hard to Find" considers herself morally superior to others by her being a "lady,"
and she freely and frequently passes judgment on other people within the story. She claims that her
conscience is a guiding force in her life, such as when she tells Bailey that her ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Only when the grandmother is facing death, in her final moments alone with the Misfit, does she
understand where she has gone wrong in life. Instead of being superior, she realizes, she is flawed
like everyone else. When she tells the Misfit that he is "one of [her] own children," she is showing
that she has found the ability to see others with compassion and understanding. With his violent
killing, the Misfit seems an unlikely source to look to for guidance, but he demonstrates a deep
conviction that the other characters lack. Unlike the grandmother, who simply assumes that she is
morally superior to everyone else, the Misfit seriously questions the meaning of life and his role in
it. He has carefully considered his actions in life and examined his experiences to find lessons
within them. He has even renamed himself because of one of these lessons, believing that his
punishment didn't fit the crime. He reveals a self–awareness that the grandmother lacked and
questions it. He knows he is not a great man, but he also knows that there are others worse than him.
He forms rudimentary philosophies, such as "no pleasure but meanness" and "the crime don't
matter." The Misfit's philosophies may be morally corrupt, but they are consistent. Unlike the
grandmother, whose moral code falls apart the moment it's challenged, the Misfit has a steady view
of life and acts according to what he believes is right. His beliefs and actions

Morality Is A Big Theme Throughout The Book Les Miserables
C project
Legality versus morality was a big theme throughout the book Les Miserables. Two of the main
main characters, Javert and Jean Valjean conflict on that issue many times. Jean Valjean is a man of
his morals rather than the law, whereas Javert is strictly about the law, and nothing else. Both of
these characters face many legal and moral issues throughout the book.
Jean Valjean looks into his morals when he is faced with a dilemma. The first time that this becomes
apparent is the beginning of the book, when we learn why he is in jail. Valjean was faced with jail
time because his family was struggling and starving and he thought is was morally okay to steal
bread for his family even though it was illegal. Valjean stealing the bread even though it was illegal,
but because his family needs it his morals say that it is okay for him to do so, showing legality
versus morality. Another thing that Valjean does that demonstrate this theme is that when Javert tells
Valjean(when he is mayor and going under the name of Madeleine) that someone has been caught
under his name. If he decides to do nothing he will then face no legal troubles any more, but because
of his morals he decides the right thing to do is to go to the court where this trail is taking place, and
say that he is the real Valjean. He think it is immoral to let this man suffer for his actions, so he
decides to reveal himself.
Javert is the opposite of Valjean, and relies heavily on the legality side. In the

Napster Revolution Case
Madelyn Anne C. De Leon 3EAC
Management03 Paper
1. The legal issue involved in this case is the piracy of music from various artists that is easily
accesible to everybody from the website called "Napster". The moral issue in this case is the music
being stolen according to the music companies or the music was just being borrowed by people all
over the internet according to Napster supporters. The difference between the two is the legal issue
is based on actual evidence like there is a law imposed about this case while the moral issue is based
on strong likelihood or firm conviction. The systematic, corporate issue is about the website
booming and how it affects the music industry while the individual issue is the persons who makes
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
4.Ofcourse, music companies share a moral responsibility for what has happened. The main goal of
this music companies is their profit from the music that they produce but it seems that they don't see
any benefit from this happening. Many people would prefer to spend their money on something else
instead of purchasing pricey music unless they are fans. Fans won't exist if the artist weren't popular
and artists wouldn't be popular if there were no fans. There is no difference at all for a fan who
bought an album of an artist and a fan who downloaded the artist music in the internet. Both are still
fans who made the artist known. Technology like Napster did change the music industry both in a
good way and a bad way. Let's face it, nothing in this world is perfectly good or perfectly bad.
Everything has its own bad and good side. Good because like what I just said, people who are thrifty
or cautious of purchasing music may have a option to download it and listen to it for free and in this
way, it is easily shared to anybody unlike physical albums. Not everybody visits the music store
frequently. It's bad side is it is very accessible to everybody like some music may contain harsh
words which may influence the youth who downloads the music from the website and also physical
album sales

William Damon 's The Death Of Honesty
William Damon's "The Death of Honesty" presents a solemn analysis of the decline of modern
virtue due to a "dysfunctional tipping point" where honesty is no longer viewed as a moral
characteristic worthy of pursuing. Dishonesty is presented as both a virtue and a vice that is shaping
our contemporary society. The Hoover Institution of Stanford University published Mr. Damon's
article in 2012 under the Task Force on the Virtues of a Free Society, which would provide a target
audience of students, educators, parents or anyone with an interest in sociology, specifically in the
United States. A rhetorical analysis recognizes the appeals of ethos and pathos as successful tools in
creating a connection with the readers, yet it exposes flaws in the author's appeal of logic. The lack
of developed logic does not support his thesis that "sustained civilization" is in lethal danger as a
result of dishonesty alone.
The appeal of ethos is based on personal and academic achievement. As a senior fellow and
professor of Stanford University with a background in child development and psychology, Mr.
Damon has the experience to write on the subject of character development of children, as well as
the failings of the academic world. Writing in the online volume of Stanford University's
"Endangered Virtues" further validates the author's authority to speak on the subject. As a father, Mr.
Damon would have a vested interest in the ability of the school system to influence his children.

Rebuilding America 's Moral Christian Walls
Rebuilding America's Moral Christian Walls As it comes to many people's attention that America's
spiritual walls have a crack in them, two of the main questions are why and how it may be repaired.
There are many documented facts that present the evidence for the reader to conclude his or her own
theory. After analysis of these facts and evidence, it is perfectly obvious to most people that the
United States of America will be responsible for its own downfall if people do not open their eyes to
the reality of their current actions and take the appropriate measures to correct the path of our
beloved country.
Now starting off, our walls began to fall with a series of events that were foretold many years before
any of this happened and has also happened to another country once before. Israel had this happen in
Biblical times. If they continued to stray away from their ways of being faithful to God, a grave
punishment would come to them along with specific warnings. One of the warnings was an invasion
or a crack in the wall, so to speak, as other foreign armies began to invade and backed off
eventually. Once again another warning was given out. Eventually, the country was conquered for a
short period of time. Now most people would say how is that involved with America? Well, similar
events have taken place. As we all know, 9/11 happened to a great number of Americans. That was a
breach of our Christian walls; to others, it was the start of the end. Now the Israelites rebuilt

Christian Moral Reasoning
Christian moral reasoning combines two different thought processes. These processes are known as
reflection and deliberation. Reflection is the process of thinking about something, while deliberation
is the process of thinking about action. The difference is considering thought versus action. These
are important considerations when evaluating moral reasoning. One must understand that he or she
must have some moral foundation before one can think toward any moral dilemma. Reflection
creates the foundation for deliberation by considering the order in which to rationalize. It gives a
direction in which to proceed when evaluating the morality of a situation. The correspondence
between reality and one's purpose is defined by teleology; working toward the greater good.
Therefore one must have a firm grasp on reality before developing a philosophical value ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The process of deliberation is an act once known as decisionism (O'Donavan 4). It is believed that
moral reasoning is a discipline of ethical decision–making (O'Donavan 4) . Deliberation should not
only be used as a last resort, or used in only certain situations, but should be used throughout daily
life. Living a life that is supplemented with deliberation will instill virtues and give general outlines
for living a Christian life. This will not only illustrate the positive aspects of Christian life, but the
negative aspects of human nature such as impurity, superstition and hostility. The guidelines created
by deliberation and reflection of Christian moral reasoning leads to certain moral rules. These rules
can be generalized, however we attempt to make them more specific and easier to understand. Part
of increasing specificity of the rules means to illustrate exceptions. Some of the challenges faced by
creating moral rules are that contradicting God's will would by illegitimate and any exception that
disproves the

Belief in a God Is Necessary for a Moral Society
Belief in a God is necessary for a moral society
Religion in the world has always been considered a rather important aspect of society. Although this
is true, there are still people that question the existence of God. A survey done among 1000 people
showed that 65 percent of Americans believe that religion is losing its influence on American life
(Sheler, 8). Even so, Belief in a God is necessary for a moral society because since the beginning of
history man has always made up some sort of role model to explain events and situations that seem
inexplicable, God gives people a sense of comfort and hope to know they aren't alone, and when a
society believes in a God, there is a religion behind it that gives ethics and values that they must ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even president Clinton himself agrees that faith and religion are very important for the growth of a
moral society. He states "I do not believe I could do my job as president, much less continue to grow
as a person, in the absence of my faith in God (Sheler, 5)"
The opposing arguments towards the belief in God and it having anything to do with moral society
usually state that the religiousness of our country doesn't have much to do with the actual religion
part (Bender, Bruno, 27). The counter argument says that religion is being used more as sociability
or a way of belonging, rather than the actual believing in a God and wanting to spread his holy
word. Other facts they may use are that people are able to have a conscience and are able to make
decisions without having a holy book to tell them the difference between right and wrong. They
usually express the fact that all people have the ability to tell between right and wrong due to
instincts.
The separation of church and state has been pushed upon people for a very long time. Today, it is
very, very unlikely to find a school where you can discuss religion. Although it seems that the
majority believes that both state and church should be separated, there are more people that feel
religion should be allowed in schools. If religion were allowed in schools, the children of America
would have a better understanding of religion and of God.

The Crossroad Of Christian Sin Versus Moral Vice
The Crossroad of Christian Sin Versus Moral Vice One is not wicked solely on the basis that they
perform wicked acts, just as one who sins is not always a sinner. Sin covers a wide range of
behaviors; but if these behaviors become habits are they still sins? Augustine seemed to believe that
sins, whether small or large, are committed when man turns away from God. Similar to sin, Aristotle
frequented the discussion on vice, a state of excess or deficiency, with virtue being the middle
ground. As he said, "We assume, then, that virtue is the sort of state that does the best actions
concerning pleasures and pains, and that vice is the contrary state" (Irwin, p. 21, lines 28–29). He
taught moral vice as different from vice, and having a direct correlation with incontinence. A type of
incontinence is the exorbitant desire for bodily pleasures, such as sex. This form of incontinence is
explored by Dante in Inferno and Purgatorio, Chaucer in Canterbury Tales, and Augustine in his
Confessions in the form of lust, a topic that will be later expanded on. Incontinence is a lack of self–
control, something man either has a predisposing for or not; to be incontinent is not a choice. This is
where the disparity and intersection between moral vice and the Christian sin present themselves.
Through the works and teachings of Aristotle, Plato, Augustine, Dante Alighieri, and Geoffrey
Chaucer the definitions and acts of both Christian sin and moral vice are explored in an attempt to

The Argument Of Emotions, Perception, And Moral Judgment
443308
Title
INTRO SENTENCE. In this essay, I will begin by explaining Robert Roberts' core argument in
Emotions, perception, and moral judgment. Next I wi *** finish this Roberts argues that emotions
are concern–based construals, which provide the perceptual basis for evaluative judgments and are
accompanied by affective "coloring." Now, I will consider each component of this core focus
individually.
As you go about your daily life, you see situations, hear stories, and consume edible creations. Each
one of these experiences entails the opportunity for individual perception, as your perception need
not align fully with that of your arch nemesis, nor your closest peer. If you share a pizza with a
friend, he or she might be nauseated by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The duck–rabbit example portrays that perceptual states are not entirely sensory, because this
example provides a single sensory image, but can result in two distinctly different interpretive
outcomes. Roberts states: "The main contrast between construals and other perceptual states is that
construals have their impression content by way of structure, the organization of the parts of
something complex into a whole, whereas sensory perceptual states have their impression content by
way of sensory impressions" (Roberts 42).
This example demonstrates key features of construal: structural character and non–sensory reliant
character. Through these features, a construal yields three potential epistemic goods: understanding,
acquaintance, and justification (Roberts 46).
We can place the framework of a construal with the notion of emotion. Emotions are formed due to
the structure of a situation and are not reliant strictly what is seen. Emotions are formed based upon
how an individual internalizes the situation, thus permitting variation in interpretation.
Why then, do we not have emotions about every single situation witnessed? If an emotion is a mere
construal, why do I not experience an emotion when I see a cross–walk sign change from "stop" to
"safe to cross"? Why do I not experience an emotion when my water is room temperature as
opposed to chilled with ice? Personally, I do not care about either of those things. A cross walk that
is not utilized does not concern me

Essay on Revenge In Two Literary Works
Revenge as a theme is cleverly built upon throughout Hamlet; with it being the driving force behind
three of the key characters in the play. Revenge is a frighteningly vicious emotion, which causes
people to act blindly and without reason. In Poe's, "The Cask of Amontillado", Montresor enacts
revenge for reasons unknown. Hamlet in contrast, has all the motive in the world to complete his
task; yet he constantly hesitates. The text reveals that the need for revenge creates a stranglehold on
the genuine emotions, thoughts, and actions of three characters: Hamlet, Prince of Denmark,
Laertes; son of Polonius, and Fortinbras; Prince of Norway. This hold makes the characters act
beyond their standard ethical positions and makes them helpless to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He is obstructed from his genuine rational moral view and if he were morally coherent, he would
have seen that taking such drastic action removes himself from his genuine thoughts. In "The Cask",
the perspective we are given on the story is limited; which allows for an open interpretation of what
his true motives for revenge are. As Baraban states "Montresor elaborates a sophisticated philosophy
of revenge: "I must not only punish, but punish with impunity" (48) presenting the reader with a
vibrant view of what he intends to do. The question one begs is, for what reason? Most readers
would finish this story and assert that mentally, Montresor is insane. As Baraban states, "Poe's
intriguing silence about the nature of the insult that made Montresor murder Fortunato has given rise
to explanations of Montresor's deed through insanity. Richard M. Fletcher, for example, maintains
that Montresor's actions are irrational and that therefore he is mad." (50) Montresor states at the
opening of the story, "you,who so well know the nature of my soul"( are words likely said on his
death bed to his confessor; being that he committed this deed fifty years prior, it would make sense
that he is finally coming clean. Moreover, since he is commenting on the nature of his soul, it is
plausible to assume that Montresor has been deemed crazy

Christian Ethics Are Too Rigid for Moral Decision Making....
It can be argued, that when referring to the Bible, teachings within it are too rigid for moral decision
making. There are many reasons for this, some which are very evident, particularly when looking at
certain teachings. On the other hand, some argue that most religious ethics are the right way to
approach moral decision making as these contain the teachings and word of God so must be correct.
Some of St. Paul's teachings are heavily criticised for being too rigid. For example if a Christian
were to be offered a promotion in a career, but it meant that they were to take someone else's job and
leave them without one, such teachings as, "Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content
with such things as you have. For He Himself has ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore these ethics can be seen as too rigid to apply to modern day moral decisions. In particular
many of St. Paul's teachings are arguably sexist. For instance St. Paul preached that women should
not be able to work, and yet today work between men and women is very equal with certain acts
making this possible. Therefore as previously mentioned, it can be argued that St. Paul's teachings
are too rigid for moral decisions, as they do not take account for the modern day.
Despite this, many argue that some Christian ethics are not too rigid for moral decision making e.g.
situation ethics. It is seen that situation ethics offers moral maturity and particularly conscience and
prayer allows the Christian to have autonomy. Many Christians today take a liberal approach to
moral decision making, as they are able to adapt the scripture for the particular situation that they
are in and believe that this will achieve the best outcome. However Fundamentalist Christians will
argue that if Christian ethics are too flexible then this could result with no ethics or guidance in what
to do, and Christians will make the wrong moral decisions.
In conclusion, Fundamentalist and Liberal Christians take different approaches to moral decision
making using religious ethics. Fundamentalist Christians will take a strict legalism approach and
abide by rules from God such as the Ten Commandments, and only act by the

Analysis Of Mandeville's Travels And Bisclavret
Monsters have always fascinated readers because of their mysterious origins and motives. These
strange and unknown characteristics lead us to ask questions and really think about how humans
justify their actions and consider what is and isn't moral. Monsters also help us come to a conclusion
about who we are as people in a functioning society. In the works of Mandeville's Travels and
Bisclavret, the authors help us discover who we are to unify us as a community, give us a sense of
security, and identifying monstrous qualities amongst people and creatures. In Mandeville's Travels,
John Mandeville tells us his stories of the discovery of the many monsters he finds across the world.
Through his stories we discover who we are as people through his monsters. His monsters tell us
what we are not, and by doing this he tells us who we are, educated, civilized, kind, and caring
people. In Mandeville's first encounter with a monster, the Melk are described as incredibly cruel
people who take pleasure in murder and making other people suffer, "There are wicked and cruel
folk there too. For they have no delight or pleasure in anything except slaughtering people to drink
their blood. And the man who can kill the greatest number of men is the most respected and
worthiest among them."(Mandeville, 134). Through this explanation we understand how bizarre of a
ritual this is because no one in their right mind would take such pleasure in taking someone's life.
Not only does this describe

Ethical And Moral Behavior And Christian World View
This is a study about one's ethical and moral behavior and Christian World View as related to
personal and professional growth and development. This study examines my personal views of
moral behavior and Christian World View as it relates to my expectation of what a manager in a
leadership position should posses and why. Growing up in a African–American Baptist church and
ultimately landing in a diverse Christian Church has shaped my life and viewpoint when it comes to
values and beliefs. There are 5 characteristics that I believe a Manager should possess: Authenticity,
transparency, empowering, trustworthy and competence. These five characteristics help to build
rapport and trust in a manager, which are good qualities to possess when leading a team. Ethic
Introspection Paper In a professional environment it is important as a manager to have a specific
viewpoint and guideline when it comes to leading a team. Managers are leaders who must know
their moral viewpoint and stance before taking on the task of being a leader. This paper will discuss
my ethical viewpoint on how managers should lead a team along with the five characteristics I
believe a manager should possess and why. "A Worldviews give faith–based answers to a set of
ultimate and ground– ing questions. Everyone operates on the basis of some worldview or faith–
based understanding of the universe and persons– examined, or unexamined, implicit or explicit,
simplistic or sophisticated. One way or

A Christian Explanation Of Moral Conscience

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Robin Anderson

More from Robin Anderson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Christian Explanation Of Moral Conscience