Tok Essay Rubric

Nursing simulation, a progressive method of education and utilized by nursing programs, improves
patient outcomes by giving students opportunities to practice and learn new nursing skills in
non–threatening environments. The uses of simulation experiences hold origin in the military and
airline industries. Nevertheless, since that time, many academic interest groups, including medical
and nursing education have adopted this educational method. Furthermore, anticipated is the idea
that simulation experiences will allow students the opportunities they need to practice skill sets that
will lead to the improvement of the patient's condition. Additionally, an evaluation of the nursing
simulation also serves an important role in determining the effectiveness of the activity in meeting
the objectives of various nursing curricula. Completing, recording, and studying the outcomes of a
methodical evaluation, such as a rubric, are foundational to the enhancement of both the procedure
and results (Robinson & Dearmon, 2013). This capstone project specifically concentrates on the
development, implementation, and evaluation of a rubric for nursing simulation scenarios
conducted by baccalaureate level nursing students at WKU. Proposed Capstone Project The
proposed capstone project included the creation and application of a rubric for nursing simulation
activities held within the baccalaureate program of nursing's Senior Practicum course at WKU. The
nursing program at WKU utilizes
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

TOK Knowledge Essay
The claim "Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts," has many flaws
in its implications. All of the knowledge that we gain as ToK knowers cannot be considered
infallible fact. The term "fact" implies that the statement or claim can be reinforced with substantial
evidence and can be proven, and we have learned that almost any information can be considered
knowledge, no matter how subjective or specific the information is. Given that an individual is
defined by having a specific and unique way of thinking and perceiving the world, most of the
knowledge gained in several different Areas of Knowledge are heavily dependent on the
perspectives of the individuals under examination. Both the Areas of Knowledge of Ethics and
Human Sciences have many ambiguities when it comes to organizing and legitimizing this data.
This leads the knower to ask, "What makes information factual in terms of ToK knowledge?" It can
be proven through Ethics and Human Sciences that knowledge is not the systematic organization of
facts, but the systematic organization of collective data to show trends and patterns. Ethical
boundaries and impressions are subjective to every individual, and the public ethical boundary must
be based off of the accumulative average of the environment. There is not a factual "This is right"
vs. "This is wrong" because no single human being has the authority to make such a statement. In
fact, it is this basic ethical disagreement that has led to

Tok Emotion Essay
Veruska M. B. November 18, 2011 TOK Mr. de Silva Grade 11 OSC TOK Essay: How do
Perception and Emotion Contribute to our Knowledge of the World? Perception is broad concept,
often defined through various contexts. Similarly, emotion has assorted definitions. These concepts
differ in their timing in the world, for without the initial perception, emotion is a non–existent
concept. And without such commodities our knowledge of the world would cease to exist. For our
perception and emotion influences the other ways of knowing (WOK) immensely such as reason
and language. Perception is how we perceive our surroundings, and the world. It's often defined in 5
stages: The sensing process, integration, analysis, reaction and...show more content...
My emotion of sadness, led me to believe that my mother must be lying to me, because the
sadness and anger obscured the truth. I was so absorbed in emotion and denial. On Monday, I
waited at the bus stop and missed two of my classes. My judgment was so clouded; I simply
rejected my perception, my knowledge, because of my strong emotion. Because of all the
happiness Simon brought me, I could not let him go. Having it been so long ago now, I have a
different emotional response whenever Simon is brought up. The emotion of sadness is still there,
but it does not cloud the knowledge I gained from the experience of the loss. In conclusion,
perception and emotion contribute to our knowledge of the world, in both its filtering of knowledge,
and its positive reaction. Emotion and perception can both suppress knowledge not wanting to be
obtained in a moment of strong emotion. But it can also be a strong positive influence in an area of
creativity and individuality. The examples of art class and the death of Simon both exemplify such
occurrences in my knowledge of the world. Works Cited Brennan, Samantha. "Thinking Positive".
Perception and Intuition, a life long challenge. http://www.positive–thinking–principles.com
/definition–of–perception.html "Definition of Emotion". Answers.Com. http://www.answers.com
/topic/emotion |

Rubric Of Rubric Testing And Evaluation Essay
Abstact This article gives a short communication about rubric testing and evaluation. It helps the
researchers to understand what is rubric, types of rubric, description about the types, application
of rubric testing, reliability of rubric testing and validity of rubric testing. Intoduction Rubric
Testing and Evaluation can perform better in the Indian classrooms with the specific purpose that
it can test even the emotional details. It has to be understood the varied background of the
students and their performance based on their involvement to test their innate ability which they
acquired in English language. Rubric Rubric is an explicit set of criteria used for assessing a
particular type of work or performance. The popularity of Rubric Scoring System is gaining
because of its authentic assessment in the educational contexts. It is used to assess the progress
of the students objectively and accurately in determining the learning (Airasian 2000; 2001;
Brualdi 1998; Perlman 2002). Rubrics consist of a fixed standard for measurement scale and a set
of criteria which help in determining the result scientifically. This also goes on to measure the
degree of quality of learning and the level of proficiency. Scoring rubrics are descriptive scoring
schemes which have been developed by teachers and evaluators to guide the analysis of the
products or process of the student's efforts. Rogers and Sando (1996) pointed out the goals and
objectives of Rubric Scoring System. ""Goals" are

Critical Thinking Rubric Essay
An employee John Schmidt has suffered a serious work related injury. There is a lot of concerns
on who is to blame for the accident. This report using the TGS Critical Thinking Rubric will serve
as framework for thinking to get to the bottom of the issue at hand. The TGS framework will help
us to be able to make a more effective, and ethical decision because the steps will enable us to
consider all possibilities that led to the incident, and avoid any quick judgments. The framework also
requires us to conduct checks and balances by checking all information against the relevant criteria
and benchmark.
The issue with in this case is whether the machine safeguard was fully efficient, or poorly designed
causing it not to function well. If the safeguard...show more content...
Harry is proving to have taken a very passive position in ensuring the safety of the employees
which was a responsibility that David had entrusted him with. With passive leaders, negativity
toward or lack of interest in safety suggests to employees that occupational safety is not important
and is undeserving of their attention (Nielsen, Morten Birkeland 2016). The foreman passive form
of leadership increased the occupational safety risk by ignoring to report the safety guard issue, and
failure to address to his coworkers the importance of ensuring to perform their duties diligently. His
action directly compromised the safety off the employees through his behavior lead to a negative
safety perception within the employees. The health and safety report also raise questions whether
management played an active role in ensuring that the shop complied to the standard safety act. A
company should do internal audits that comply with the specific standard guidelines in an industry
to avoid any injuries, lawsuits of fines from government agents responsible for ensuring the industry
is in compliance with some established standard other than what they refer to as satisfactory
according to the maintenance

The Historians Task Is To Understand The Past
"The historian's task is to understand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change
the future." To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge?
Colegio Franklin Delano Roosevelt
November 13 2013
May 2014 Exam Session
Word Count: 1600
Humans have come to accept that History by mere definition is the exploration and study of history
whereas the Human Sciences are defined as the in depth study of social, biological and cultural
aspects of human beings. As humans we have used and accepted this two Areas of Knowledge, to
interpret and understand the world around us. History and Human Sciences seek to influence
humans through language, reason, and emotion. An assumption is made here that...show more
content...
Since our knowledge is primarily based on intuitions and assumptions as to what a person's behavior
is going to be5, it can then be inferred by historians what will happen in the future.
Although historians seek for evidence to substantiate their facts, there are times were no physical
evidence is found therefore they discard their evidence as merely a myth or relate it to other
accounts who share a similar believe. Nonetheless historians, who fail to seek into the past to
substantiate their viewpoint, don't necessarily neglect the idea of using the evidence found to better
the future. When a historian is successful at achieving his goal and writes a successful review on a
historical event it is then when he reasons as to whether the information can be applied to the future
to make an improvement or if it should be discarded as another piece of evidence of our history's
past.
On similar concept, Human Sciences also study the past to try and change the future. Anthropology
as a branch of this AOK cultural anthropology6 studies the cultural and social variation among the
different communities and races in the world. Back in the past there was a misconception as to what
cultural anthropology studied.

Tok Essay
10. 'Through different methods of justification, we can reach conclusions in ethics that are as
well–supported as those provided in mathematics.' To what extent would you agree?
One could argue that mathematics and ethics are the underlying essentials above which our society
has based itself. Scores of cities have built their infrastructures using measurements and methods
founded in mathematics. Our inherent ethical natures have catalyzed the great minds from ancient
civilizations to create democracies, and have enabled our generations to uphold these same moral
principles. While both these studies are so readily used today, when comparing them it is essential in
understanding at the same time the disparity between the two subjects. The...show more content...
Using whichever ethical lens that you feel encompasses your morals/values (deontology,
utilitarianism, altruism, etc.), you can ultimately reach sound conclusions. But even so, there are so
many more aspects to consider, especially when dissecting an ethical issue. So how can we then
determine any "general" conclusions to ethics? By this, I am in essence making a referral to some
sort of a general consensus to a universal query. It is up to the individual who is asked, is it not, on
how they perceive the argument, and how they react to it? Can we therefore begin to view ethics as
an intrinsic human reaction, a way of immediate analysis, or even the societal expectation that we
carefully scrutinize every situation placed before us before concluding? This unique interpretation
of ethics could completely reform how conclusions are made and what they might entail. If we take
for example abortion, it is known that abortion is not a subject in which there are clear–cut
solutions. I stand firmly with my belief that the choice of abortion is rightfully entrusted to women,
but then again, I share a personal connection with this abortion issue. My mother, who in every way
is my idol, has a sickness which inhibits her body's ability to function at certain times. Three years
ago, she became pregnant. Doctors predicted disabilities the baby could have due to medications my
mother was taking. I admire my mother for her courage and

Tok Essay -- Emotions vs Reason
TOK Essay
Reasoning and Emotions and the quest for Knowledge
19th century English philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge claimed that "deep thinking is
attainable only by a person of deep feeling", thereby implying that emotions, or "deep feeling",
play a key role in the quest for knowledge and the ability to reason, or, the ability to think deeply.
However, day after day I am confronted with evidence contradicting his statement, and, although I
do my best not to have biased perception, I do not see much in support. Emotions cause me, day
after day, to make poor decisions while a little voice in my head – a voice I like to call reason –
urges me to act differently. The first example that comes to mind is the fact that I am currently
working...show more content...
He would enquire: "what would push you to the desire of opening that door? You have no more
passion and no more hope of achieving happiness." The reason why, for Coleridge's supporters,
emotional energy plays such a key role is that happiness is the intrinsic finality of the human life:
everything the individual strives for. But the wish for happiness is not the only driving factor.
Curiosity, assuming it is an instinct, will still be present in your chemical structure once emotions
removed and therefore encourage you to open the "knowledge door", or, take the red pill. Thus
knowledge is achieved. However I must admit that this illustration is a simplified version of the
'truth'.
It is in fact heavily based on the presumption that knowledge in one entity with one outcome. But as
we know, knowledge exists in distinct areas and can take many different forms. The 'truth' is that in
our ten by ten white room, there would not be just one "knowledge door". There would be
thousands, or even millions, behind which lay many different paths; paths which often intersect with
that of "happiness". These may lead to knowledge that varies from learning to play football to a
solution to world hunger. So then, how would you know which door to choose from? Being an
individual who relies purely on reasoning, you might

Tok
A model is a simplified representation of some aspect of the world. In what ways may models help
or hinder the research for knowledge?
A model by definition is "a schematic description of a system, theory, or phenomenon that
accounts for its known or inferred properties and may be used for further study of its
characteristics"(source) that implies that a model is supposed to be a helping hand while
searching for knowledge in any subject. Sometimes however models can appear to be quite
confusing as they are to general or too far away from real life situations. So how and in what way
models can help and hinder the search for knowledge in natural sciences, human sciences and arts I
am going to argue in the following essay.
In school we...show more content...
However the models of art only help us in the search for artistic knowledge. However logically
anyone can differentiate between a Picasso and a Monet as the differences are easy to be seen but it
takes a lot of study to empirically know the different models.
That means we can only understand and use the models if we understand art so to a normal
human being that does not want to have a deeper knowledge about art and its backgrounds and
the fine borders between the styles those models are useless. In this case they are too subject
specific for someone to use. Models can also be interpreted as being rules about how to specifically
draw or paint something so that it is art. A good example for that is theMona Lisa by Leonardo
DaVinci. Although he drew a women in a realistic way, her eyebrows are missing, which lets
people detach from the painting emotionally as she seems less human in a way. In the Arts
models can also be something different. A very good example for that would be the Mona Lisa
by Leonardo DaVinci. His model we assume was a woman or a man that must have looked just
like an everyday person, however DaVinci whether on purpose or not left out any emotion and lets
the person appear extremely emotionless and cold. In this way the art work hinders us from
knowing more about the intentions of this painting and also about the person being drawn. However
this is a trigger for people to want to find out more about this painter and

Tok Essay
New TOK Essay
Topic 3: There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss this claim.
I'd always believed that the truth was a rather simple idea. To me, it was something that was true or
correct or existing in this world. But after all the discussions in TOK, with family and with friends,
and after deep rumination on the subject, I've realized that's it's a much more broad, complex and
often mind–boggling concept. However, now I see that there are essentially three main factors that
lead us to accepting something as the truth: a strong emotional belief, our senses (particularly sight)
and applied logic and reasoning. These are in fact three of the ways of knowing. Language is used to
aid the acceptance...show more content...
The belief may have been cultivated by family, religion, culture or any other external factor but the
fact remains that it is accepted as a truth mainly because of the strong emotions associated with it.
However, these same emotions are incredibly varied between people because of the differences in
family, religion, culture and other factors. Hence, there are also people (atheists) that have strong
emotions against the existence of God. As this difference in beliefs between people exists and will
most probably always exist because of the diversity of our world, emotional belief as a truth cannot
be absolute. It is relative to the person believing the truth.
Applied logic and reasoning is fundamental to determining axioms, formulas and concepts in Math
that are considered to be truths. In Math HL, we have a topic called induction whereby the goal is
to prove a certain formula or equation. We can prove the formula, but on all occasions, it is only
true within a certain domain, i.e. for a certain set of values. This shows that the formula is not an
absolute truth but relative to the variables involved. But let's also consider the simplest equation
known to man: 1 + 1 = 2. Isn't this an absolute truth? I used to believe so, until I discovered that a
pile of sand + a

Rough Draft Rubric Exemplary In Progress Work Needed Notes Content 10 All content issues
have been taken care of. No gaps exist that might confuse the audience. 9 8 7 6 Some content gaps
still exist, but for the most part the content gives the necessary information. 5 4 3 2 1 0 Enough
content gaps exist to keep speech from feeling like a complete piece. Original Wording 10 100%
of content is original when run through a plagiarism checker. 9 8 7 6 Most of content is original,
but there are some sections that need to be altered more. 5 4 3 2 1 0 Most of content is taken from
another source without appropriate rewording. 1st Person 5 100% of content is written in 1st

Analytic Rubric
You covered all the areas of the question very well. Just like you said both rubrics are appropriate
for grading and the teachers will know exactly when to put to use one or the other. Analytic rubrics
are more specific when it comes to grading their writing skills such as an essay or a research paper.
When using analytic rubrics we must be prepared to spend quality time scoring them assignment, as
you mentioned it is more consuming to score than a holistic

Holistic Rubrics
A tool to evaluate a third year nursing student for the management of a postoperative patient using
the nursing process
Educators are faced with many challenges in accurately assessing and evaluating students, and
although these two codes are closely related, their effective completion requires different actions.
Assessment is a systematic process of collecting and interpreting information about students'
achievements, while evaluation refers to a value judgement that attaches meaning to the data
obtained through assessment (Mc Donald, 2007). Educators are called upon to assess and evaluate
students who they instruct based on the students' learning outcomes and course objectives.
Rubrics can be used as an objective tool to evaluate students' performance in a particular area, since
it assists the examiner to identify key components of which are to be...show more content...
This point is often expressed in terms of students understanding the learning target and criteria for
success. For this reason, rubrics underpin the coordination of instruction and assessment, and they
help students learn (Books, 2013).
There are two types of rubrics available for use in examinations, a holistic rubric and an analytic
rubric. Holistic rubrics can be defined as single criteria rubrics (one–dimensional) used to assess
participants' overall achievement on an activity or item based on predefined achievement levels.
Holistic rubrics may use a percentage or text only scoring method and to assess student's work as a
whole. (Brightspace, 2016)
Analytic rubric focuses on individual elements of the ideal response and scores each element
separately (McDonald, 2007). Analytic rubrics identify and assess components of a finished product.
This rubric breaks down the characteristics of an assignment into parts, allowing the scorer to
itemize and define exactly what aspects are strong, and which ones need

TOK ESSAY "Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth" (Pablo Picasso) There are different
ways for art to portray elements of truth and lies; but what Picasso was mostly referring to with
his quote was that art might be a representation of the truth however lies to the human eye in terms
of perception. The word art is somehow "controversial, especially in contemporary philosophy"
because it relies on different AOK's and WOK's. The main area of art focused to support Picasso's
quote will be theatre and what philosophical role it plays in our everyday society, do we really
need it, and is theatre the true or false image of reality? It is evidently challenging to make any sense
out of this quote especially when the truth can...show more content...
It is commonly known that theatre is mostly connected to political or spiritual ideologies. Arthur
Miller's The Crucible, takes a historical fact and turns into a political play based on the Salem
witch trials; can the truth be seen in this play? Yes, mostly because of the main historical debate
described in the play involving Wiccan cult versus Christianity and it is known to be based on
cultural concerns. "The play can be seen as symbolic of the paranoia about communism that
pervaded America in the 1950s" . Thus, Miller's play on the witch trials in Salem originates from
the true events however is projected with false pretenses. Aristotle's Poetics have six elements for
theatre and there are surnamed Plot, Characterization, Idea, Language, Music and Spectacle. These
elements represent the keys to a theatre performance, however where is the psychology in that?
One theatre genre that can be an absolute opposition to Stanislavsky's perception of theatre is
known as the Theatre of the Absurd. The theatre of the absurd does not follow any guidelines
concerning the techniques of theatre, which is why it is a good example because absurdity does
not have any true or false, it is a bit chaotic and strange at the same time. BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Websites "A Philosophy of Theater В« " East of Mina. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2011.

Tok Essay: Critical and Creative Thinking
Wilde
Theory of Knowledge
3 May 2012
TOK Essay Response: Critical and Creative Thinking Since the dawn of humanity, man has sought to
gain further insight on life through attaining knowledge. Knowledge can be defined as any
information gained through personal experience. The means of obtaining knowledge include four
main branches: reason, perception, language, and emotion. Despite the means, all knowledge is
formulated through the process of thinking. Thinking refers to the use of the mind to gain
understanding of the world. In the modern educational system, students are trained to think critically
and apply gathered information to generate knowledge. However, schools also stress the idea of
being original, using one's own creative...show more content...
In my IB Chemistry class earlier this year, my class was asked to design a neutralization lab. In
our lab, we had the task of reaching a neutralization of an acid and a base. Each student designed
his or her own unique experiment to cater to his or her individual creative tastes. I chose to do a
titration with a strong base and a weak acid. In contrast, one of my peers chose to use litmus paper to
test the acidities of various liquids. A common conclusion can be reached through creative means.
Furthermore, creativity plays a prominent role in the study of astronomy. The universe is such a vast
space that holds much of the unknown. Dating back to the ancient Greeks, people have attempted to
make sense of the universe, to understand its extensity. The ancient civilizations originally used their
imagination to picture how they believed the universe to look like. There were no microscopes or
rockets to allow travel into space. There was no prior knowledge to evaluate. Creative thinking was
used prior to critical thinking. Imagination created the image of space, then critical thinking
evaluated its validity. A counterclaim could be that modern technology has allowed humans to
observe extraterrestrial activity as well as enter space. Therefore, in modern astronomy, people use
critical thinking to analyze their observations to understand the universe. I would argue that although
advancement in

Tok External Assessment Essay
TOK
"Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are." To what extent is this true in the Human Sciences and
Ethics?
Socrates once said, "To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is the meaning of true
knowledge" [1]. In similar vein, Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Knowledge is knowing that we
cannot know" [1]. A great Indian master, Nisargadatta Maharaj once quoted, "To know what you are,
you must first investigate and know what you are not" [2]. What were Socrates, Emerson,
Nisargadatta hinting at?
Is there any such thing as 'knowledge' and if so, can this knowledge ever give us a sense of who we
are? Is there one concrete sense of 'who we are' that persists all throughout our lives or is our sense
of identity a montage of...show more content...
In reality, 65% of the participants in Milgram's study delivered the maximum shocks [4]. 'Bystander
effect' is another monstrous revelation of abnormal human behavior in social circumstances. The
bystander effect occurs when the presence of others hinder an individual from intervening in an
emergency situation [5]. A recent case of the bystander effect was the running over of 2 year old
Chinese toddler twice as dozens just watched her succumbing to her injuries without offering any
help [6].
Many other startling revelations from the world of Social Psychology demonstrate 'how we
behave' in society but does this knowledge really give us a sense of who we are as individuals?
Although these experiments and many others, to a large extent, do accurately provide a sense of
how humans behave in public, I feel that such studies erroneously generalize human identity in
terms of how they behave in society but this doesn't provide a concrete sense of who one really is
at the core. Just because one, under the multifarious dynamics of public pressure, behaves in a
certain way might not mean that one IS that way. The biggest flaw of Social Psychology might be
that it labels a string of behavioral tendencies and actions as part of individual identity. Is how we
behave under pressure really a part of who we are at the core?
On the other hand, there are those who would claim that one is what one behaves i.e. one's actions
are what gives on a sense of who

Tok Sense Perception
To what extent is sense perception a good foundation for reliable knowledge?
Sitting in this classroom today, I can see different things around me, smell different smells around
the room, feel the keyboard underneath my fingertips, taste the apple I had during lunch and hear
all the different sounds coming from all different people in the room. I can say I know this to be
true because we perceive the world through our five senses: sight, sound, taste, touch and smell.
Knowledge is what we learn, what we gain from our own experiences and what we understand from
other people's interpretations. Our senses provide us with a journey, which we are able to take or
reject.
Trusting our senses comes so naturally that we don't realize what...show more content...
Appearance and reality can be very tricky to distinguish. I remember asking myself last month
when I was very happy, is this real, or is this what I want my life to be? Without knowing, without
realizing we prove to ourselves what is real and what is not by using the tests truth. When I was told
about this, I didn't even know what the tests of truth were. The first one is confirmation by another
sense, if something looks like an apple and tastes like an apple, then we would conclude that its an
apple. The reason we would use this is if one of our sense are wrong, like for example dry ice, when
you look at it is steamy so we would say that it is hot, but in fact if you touch it, it is cold.
The second test of truth is coherence. When you see something that doesn't fit into what you
expect from experience of the world then you are most probably mistaken. For example when I
was a little kid I used to spin around in circles until I was dizzy, and when I stopped I used to see
the world spin around me. Although when I was not dizzy I knew that, that wasn't true. Finally the
third test of truth is independent testimony, testimony of other people. For example when I have
put my mom's phone on the table and I have seen it there, and when my mom asks for it, and its
not on the table I ask my brothers and sisters to prove that they saw it there as well and my mom is
most

Ever since the beginning of the Revolution of science, the western world has valued the scientific
improvement over any other, placing scientific theories and leaders on the base above their equals
in lower sectors of society such as leaders within the business sector or governmental leaders, which
leads to the question: Why is it that the Sciences and theories are held in such as great respects?
With the two different areas of knowledge what results and consequences, do these two different
sciences utilize methods such as observation, empirical evidence and the scientific method, in the
development of theories? These two areas of knowledge have key differences at their conclusion,
which leads to their differences in their ways that they...show more content...
Scientific theories are not always completely reliable. But then again why do people think that
certain theories are so definite that they have settled with the theory being true? A reason for that
could be that scientific method that the scientists develop to apply their respective theories and
conclusions are so reliable that we even put our confidence into it. One of the ways of knowing,
Reasoning is what the theories in natural sciences mostly rely on and where the scientific methods
are developed from. The method of testing observations, and having reliable and consistent results, in
a process which many participate and improve based upon describing in objective matter. There are
several theories that we have come across, one of them, which involves chemistry is the "collision
theory". The theory itself provides a great explanation to why chemical reactions occur and reasons
for the reactions to vary for multiple reactions. Experiments that are performed by a class showed the
same results, with the statement as the concentration of the reactants increased, the same it did to the
rate of the reaction. This was a simplified view on this problem, as it demonstrates the strengths of
the scientific method and what the result comes with the theories with natural sciences; in which
repeated trials produce the same results, which will in turn strengthen the theory more. This way, the
theories in natural sciences are convincing, because the theories are

Knowledge is generated through the interaction of critical and creative thinking. Evaluate this
statement in two areas of knowledge.
The way knowledge is generated is different among the various areas of knowledge, but the way
we gain knowledge requires thinking, thought processes, and this may be either critical or creative.
The two areas of knowledge I will be addressing are Natural sciences and the arts. The definition of
critical thinking is to "judge" and thus implies the use of logical reasoning using convergent thinking.
While creative thinking implies the opposite, using a divergent approach which will tend to reach a
variety of possible results. Creative thinking is "producing" , like producing alternatives and therefore
...show more content...
Individuals are different, however when they are in a group, a crowd, they tend to converge and
have the same attitudes or at least similar ideas. This example is just to show why we are biased
in favoring critical thinking. We normally associate critical thinking with more "solid" subjects
such as the natural sciences and math. Because in those subjects it seems that there is only one
right answer and therefore "converging" is easier to demonstrate in those 2 areas of knowledge.
On the other hand, subjects like art, seem to use creative thinking more. For example: coming up
with new ideas to pain, a new story, a new poem, a different style to paint on a canvas, a different
way to make a sculpture of something. So this shows how we tend to lean towards the natural
sciences, because they seem more concrete, and therefore we are more biased to agree with a
"converging" theory, which is the definition for critical thinking. In other words, critical thinking
seems more "logical" and more "right", of course this could lead to questions such as why is
being "logical" more appealing and why can't creative thinking be logical as well. Well we are
logically trying to diverge from old ideas and finding new ways of thinking or new knowledge.
One of the examples is in art, the shift in styles such as from Romanticism to Realism to
Impressionist art. Each was formed because it was a creative form of the other one. Didn't these ideas

|TOK Essay Title : "That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without
evidence" Do you agree ? | |Word Count: 1240 Words | Evidence is a thing or things that help in
attaining knowledge. The statement "that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed
without evidence" means that it is possible to confirm and dismiss the same if there is no evidence
or proof to form an undebatable judgement. In this essay I am going to analyse this quote from the
prospective of different Areas of Knowledge. I will proceed in this way because they...show more
content...
high unemployment or high inflation)?" There are two main schools that present this issue: the
Keynesians argue in demand policies while New Classicals argue that supply management policies
allow a long–term improvement in these deficiencies. The question that arises from this reasoning
is the following: "Is there then a "true" theory and a "false" one?" The answer is No, as both these
contrasting theories are based upon reason and sense perception. However, to a degree they also
dismiss the other theory. In fact, as the discussion is about which theory is best for governments to
improve its macroeconomic deficiencies, there can be only one theory that respect this statement.
Here again it is shown how a scientific claim based upon reason and sense perception is not
necessarily true as it can be displaced by another theory based upon other evidence. Therefore, in
this Area of Knowledge I agree with the statement "That which can be asserted without evidence can
be dismissed without evidence". A key knowledge issue is the counter argument to the underlying
assumption of the title. If one is to base an argument or a knowledge claim on the need to provide
evidence, then one must also provide evidence to dismiss a competing argument. What this means is
that in order to dismiss an assertion, one would indeed require evidence in order to prove the
dismissal. The statement is

Tok Essay Rubric

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Tok Essay Rubric