The maxim says you can lead a horse to the river, but you can't make it drink. But for the persuasive speaker the question, without using coercion, how to you lead the horse to the river and make it drink?
2. ]
[Objectives
» By the end of the lesson, students will be
able to :
• apply the various forms of appeal in constructing their persuasive
speech.
• appreciate the central role of persuasion in democracy.
• use the various forms of argument in their persuasive speech.
3. ]
[Persuasion
» …a deliberate attempt by the speaker to create,
reinforce, or change the attitudes, beliefs, values,
and/or behavior of the listener (Ford-Brown, 2014).
• A deliberate attempt to persuade, not coercion.
• Attitudes.
• Beliefs.
• Values.
• Behaviors.
4. ]
[End Goal of Persuasion
» Narrow listeners options
» Appeals (proofs) to a particular response—
convince, stimulate, actuate.
» Proposition of fact, value, or policy.
• All homeowners should be required to recycle.
• Plagiarism is unacceptable.
• Genetically altered vegetables are unhealthy.
5. ]
[Traditional Appeals
» Appeal to pathos—Stir you audience’s sense of fear, sympathy,
empathy, happiness, or anger.
» Appeal to Mythos—legends, folktales, music and poetry
(narratives).
» Appeal to ethos—character, competency, charisma
Initial ethos, derived ethos, and terminal ethos.
» Appeal to logos—reason.
6. ]
[Traditional Appeals
» logos—reasoning.
Statement Cell phone use while driving is pervasive
Evidence
Evidence
As of October 2008, 266 million people in the
United States subscribed to some form of
wireless communication, including cell phones.
This is up from 4.3 in 1990 (Insurance
Information Institute, 2008).
In 2006, a study reported that at any moment
during the day, eight percent of drivers are on
their cell phones (Siegel, 2010).
Conclusion Given the number of subscribers and the
number of drivers using them, it would be
difficult to drive anywhere and not meet
someone using a cell phone.
8. ]
[Modern Appeals
» Appeals to harmony—dissonance versus consonance.
» Appeal to gain—rational choice theory (RCT) or expectancy-
outcome values theory.
» Appeal to commitment—central processing or peripheral
processing (effectively audience analysis required).
10. ]
[Parts Of An Argument
» Claim—the assertion you make.
• All public buildings should be smoke-free.
• Owning a gun is wrong.
• Too much fluoride in our drinking water can be dangerous.
11. ]
[Parts Of An Argument
» Evidence—the information that proves
your claim.
• Facts.
• Testimonies.
• Definitions.
• Statistics.
12. ]
[Parts Of An Argument
» Warrants—assumptions that act as link between evidence and
claim (authoritative, motivational, and substantive).
14. ]
[Different Types Of Argument
» Arguments by analogy—you conclude that something will
be accurate for one case if is true for another similar case.
15. ]
[Different Types Of Argument
» Argument by cause—demonstration of a relationship
between two events in which one cause the other.
• The increase in violence in our public schools is the effect of
increased in the entertainment world (Effect-to-cause).
• Procrastinating on your assignments will cause you to get lower
grades (cause-to-effect).
16. ]
[Different Types Of Argument
» Argument by authority—testimony from individuals
audience consider credible.