This brief capture how Coordination and Supervision of Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) running since 2014. At the first time, National Movement on Saving the Natural Resources covers several sectors, there are marine, fishery, forestry, mining, and plantation. Considering the complicated problem the Coordination and Supervision in mining sector expanded to other sectors such as: oil and gas, electricity, and renewable energy. Publish What You Pay Coalition recommend to: first, Immediately curbing the non-CnC IUP and IUP which is operated in the conservation and protection forest. Second, Immediately issuing Presidential Decree on moratorium of mining permit. Three, Immediately revitalizing and developing permits database which is also integrated with national One Map policy. Four, Immediately improving mineral and coal mining permit mechanism both in national and sub-national.

1. BriefJune 2016
1 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
HTTP://PWYP-INDONESIA.ORG
Policy
1. The general pattern of mining permit (IUP) governance problems consist of (a)
Territorial problem: shift/expansion of coordinates, coordinates are not perpendicular,
overlap between the same/different commodities, permit is in the area of conservation
and protection forest (open pit mining), permit overlaps with an administrative area; (b)
Administrative problem: non synchronization of database of local government and the
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource, the expired IUP has yet to be revoked, invalid
address of IUP, IUP which doesn’t go through KP Exploration but rather jump into KP
Exploitation, allotment and relinquishment of IUP before the enactment of Law Number
4 Year 2009.
2. Until April 2016, there are 3,982 non-CnC IUP of 10,348 IUP in Indonesia. Only
61.52% or equivalent to 6,366 IUP is eligible to operate. The rest is has yet to meet the standard
operation, either in term of administrative or territorial, social, and environmental aspect.
3. Many found permits or contracts which are located in the restricted area for forest
area utilization, reaching 1.37 million Hectares in the conservation forest and 4.39 million
Hectares in the protection forest (open-pit mining). Meaning that 16.2% of IUP area shall be
curbed, given total area of IUP/KK/PKP2B is 38.9 million Hectares which is located in the
forest area (26 million Hectares) and land for other uses (12.9 million Hectares).
4. Follow-up of IUP governance through issuance of Ministerial Decree of Energy
and Mineral Resources Number 43 Year 2015 is a great momentum to be overseen
and synchronized with the process of handover of personnel, funding, facilities and
infrastructure as well as document of permit (P3D) as mandated of Law Number 23 Year
on Local Government.
Recommendations
1. Immediately curbing the non-CnC IUP and IUP which is operated in the
conservation and protection forest. The action taken shall be in accordance with
applied regulation also its appointed deadline: Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral
Resources 43/2015 and the provision of Law 23/2014 regarding process of handover of
personnel, funding, facilities and infrastructure as well as document from regency/city
government to provincial government.
2. Immediately issuing Presidential Decree on moratorium of mining permit, thus no
more issuance of new permit during the evaluation process until all non-CnC IUPs, which
has yet to meet territorial and administrative requirement, has been curbed or resolved.
3. Immediately revitalizing and developing permits database which is also
integrated with national One Map Policy, by applying a valid mapping and spatial
coordinate system also single identity mechanism for company registry.
4. Immediately improving mineral and coal mining permit mechanism both in
national and sub-national, which shall be integrated, in line with one stop service policy,
one map policy, and accommodate applied authority division system.
KPKSupervisionandImprovingof
MiningPermitGovernance1
Maryati Abdullah - Meliana Lumbantoruan - Rizky Ananda Wulan Sapta Rini
MainFindings
Table of Contents
• Main Findings
• Recommendations
• Foreword
• Main Objectives of Korsup
Minerba
• Korsup Minerba and Mining
Permit Governance
• Mining Permit Governance
in the Forest Area
• Mining Permit Governance
by Local Government
• Follow up of Korsup
Minerba
• Recommendations
The implementation
of Korsup is part of
National Movement to
Save Natural Resources
(known as Gerakan
Nasional Penyelamatan
Sumber Daya Alam-
GNPSDA) which is
initiated by research
and development
team of KPK and firstly
declared on 6 June
2014.
“
1
This report is part of PWYP’s analysis on result of Korsup Minerba that initiated by KPK which involved 13 Ministries/Institutions and 32 Provinces.
PWYP is one of CSO as partner in Korsup Minerba.

2. 2 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
Foreword
Along with the strengthening function of KPK on prevention aspect, the role of trigger mechanism is implemented through
coordination and supervision (Korsup) function in natural resources sector by involving related sector-based ministries/agencies
(Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR), Ministry of Environment and Forest (MEF), and Ministry of Finance), law
enforcer and local government in 12 provinces (plus 19 provinces in 2015) also national and local civil society organizations. The
implementation of Korsup is part of National Movement to Save Natural Resources (known as Gerakan Nasional Penyelamatan
Sumber Daya Alam-GNPSDA), which is initiated by research and development team of KPK and firstly declared on 7 February
2014 (2,5 years ago). Initially, GNPSDA only covers marine/fisheries, mining as well as forestry and plantation sector. However,
considering the complexity of problems and the urgency of a comprehensive governance, the scope of Korsup in mining sector
is expanded to oil and gas, electricity and renewable energy sector, which is known as Korsup Energi and officially launched on
15 February 2016.
Mining sector, especially mineral and coal, is one of strategic resources which hugely contributes to national economy. The
study conducted by KPK in 2011 revealed critical problems in mineral and coal mining governance, covering development of data
and information system on mineral and coal, governance of mining permits (KP and IUP), implementation of regular reporting,
practice of reclamation and post-mining and optimization of state revenue. Hence, Korsup in mineral and coal mining or referred
to as Korsup Minerba mainly aims to promote an effective mining governance with: (1) Data and information system on mineral
and coal which enables an accurate and timely reporting; (2) Reporting system which enables monitoring on production report,
thus it can prevent or early detect corruption; (3) Sufficient regulation which enables good mining governance.
Main Objectives of Korsup Minerba
Main objectives of Korsup Minerba cover:
1. Mining Permit (IUP) Governance is targeting no more IUP which has yet to meet the requirement of certification of CnC,
do not possess tax ID number (NPWP) and Forest Land Borrow and Use Permit (IPPKH), and do not violate regulations on land,
spatial, and environment.
2. Implementation of the company’s financial obligation is targeting all mining companies pay off their financial
obligation, including land rent, royalty, tax, reclamation and post-mining fund, guarantee of seriousness and other financial
obligations.
3. Monitoring on mineral and coal production is targeting all mining companies submit production report on a regular
basis, all local government conduct regular reporting on production monitoring in their region, all local government impose
sanctions toward companies which do not implement good mining practices and violate applied regulations as well as no
more illegal mining (PETI).
4. Implementation of processing/refinery obligations is targeting no more mining companies which do not conduct
processing/refinery obligations and impose sanctions toward those who violate.
5. Supervision of sales and transportation/mining products shipping is targeting all mining companies submit sales
reporting, all local government convey supervision result on sales and transportation/mining products shipping as well as
impose sanctions for those who conduct sales and transportation/mining products shipping illegally.
Korsup Minerba and Mining Permit Governance
Mining permit governance in Korsup Minerba is conducted
by facilitating coordination across sector to resolve the
problems on non-CnC IUP; conduct supervision on freezing
or temporary suspension or revocation of IUP which has
yet to meet the requirements; identify factor and actor who
hamper effort on mining permit governance; socialization and
campaign on system/policy improvement as part of an effort
to prevent corruption. These measures are taken by involving
all stakeholders, particularly Directorate General of Mineral
and Coal Mining, MEMR and local government in the province
and regency/city.
Law and regulations which serve as a legal basis on
mining permit governance cover: (1) Article 102 paragraph
2, Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2010 on
Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business
Activities; (2) Article 2 Paragraph 1 and Article 13 Paragraph
1, Government Regulation Number 55 Year 2010 on Guidance
and Supervision of Mineral and Coal Mining; (3) Ministerial
Decree of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 2 Year 2013
on Supervision of the Implementation of Mining Management
Conducted by Provincial Government and Regency; (4)
Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral Resources Number
2 Year 2014 on Delegation of Part of Government Affairs on
Energy and Mineral Resources to Governor as Government
RepresentativeintheFrameworkofDeconcentrationforFiscal
Year 2014; (5) Circular Letter of Director General of Mineral
and Coal Number 04-E/30/DJB/2014 dated 14 April regarding
Development and Supervision of Mineral and Coal Mining
Permit Governance in the Framework of Deconcentration; (6)
Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral Resources Number
43 Year 2015 on Procedure of Evaluation for the Issuance of
Mineral and Coal Mining Permit.
The initial measure in mining permit governance is to
conduct data collection and reconcile as well as integrate
all mining permit data from government (MEMR) and local
government (province and regency). Collected and reconciled
data include: IUP and its CnC status (already, on-going process,
and non-CnC); number of IUP which don’t possess tax ID
number (NPWP) and the cause; number of IUP and its area
which operated in the conservation and protection forest;
number of IUP which don’t possess Forest Land Borrow and
Use Permit (IPPKH); also number of IUP which don’t have
or yet to pay reclamation and post-mining fund. Pattern of
findings in data collection and reconciliation is summarized
in table 1.

3. 3 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
No. Pattern of Findings Follow-Up
1
CnC IUP recorded in the MEMR are not
recorded in the local government
Regent/Mayor is urged to submit reference letter to Director General of
Mineral and Coal-MEMR, forwarded to KPK
2
IUP issued by local government are not
recorded in the MEMR, but is proposed to
gain CnC status to the province
Provincial government and Director General of Mineral and Coal are
urged to ensure the validity of document of the possibility of back
dated IUP, in order to investigate and take legal measures
3
IUP ended, but has yet to be revoked Governor/Regent/Mayor are urged to collect the obligations and im-
mediately write Decree Termination/Revocation of IUP
4
IUP operate in the conservation and pro-
tection forest
Governor/Regent/Mayor are urged to send letter of notification on re-
linquishment/ temporary suspension and ask the company to manage
licensing in Ministry of Environment and Forest
5
Not valid/clear address of IUP Governor/Regent/Mayor are urged to ensure the address of IUP in their
region
6
IUP revoked, but included in the unregis-
tered permit in MEMR
Governor/Regent/Mayor are urged to immediately coordinate with
Director General of Mineral and Coal in order to be excluded from IUP
database in MEMR
Following data collection and reconciliation, the next measures are evaluating and
curbing IUP, which are conducted through administrative arrangement as well as sanctions
and law enforcement. Administrative arrangement is pursued through coordination
and submission/reconciliation of data between local government and MEMR in order to
complete IUP database, review IUP validity (validity of IUP address and investigate the
possibility of back date), as well as recommend licensing management which involves
MEF. While sanctions and law enforcement will be executed through relinquishment/
temporary suspension of IUP which operate in the conservation and protection forest till
the completion of its time period, as well as revocation of IUP which has expired and yet
to meet standards of CnC. The result of evaluation then reported on a periodic basis to KPK
and MEMR directly or through forum monitoring and evaluation which is held periodically
by Team of Korsup Minerba. Progress of mining permit evaluation is presented in Figure 2.
The initial measure
in mining permit
governance is to
conduct data collection
and reconcile as well
as integrate all mining
permit data from
government (MEMR)
and local government
(province and regency/
city).
“
Table 1. Pattern of Findings in Monitoring Mining Permits and the Follow-Up
Source: Presentation of KPK in Monev of Korsup Minerba in Bali, 3-4 December 2014
Figure 2. Progress of Mining Permit Evaluation in Korsup Minerba

4. 4 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
Main criteria of CnC
assessment cover
administrative,
territorial, technical,
financial and
environmental
aspect.
According to the law,
mining activity that’s
located in the forest
area is categorized
as Use of Forest Area
(PKH).
“
Mining Permit Governance in the Forest Area
Ecologically, forest plays an important role in maintaining the balance of nature; water
supply for human life and all life on earth through natural cycles; the lungs of the world;
as well as a habitat for a wide range of biodiversity. According to the law, mining activity
that’s located in the forest area is categorized as Use of Forest Area (PKH). PKH is defined as
the use of a portion of forest for development other than forestry activities without changing
the function and designation of forest. PKH is conducted by Borrow and Use of Forest Area
Permit (IPPKH) through the submission to the Minister of Environment and Forests. IPPKH is
closely related to the compensation for land or compensation payment of non-tax revenues
(non-tax revenues, IUPPKH).
Based on the explanation of Korsup Minerba team, the overlay of the map of all IUP and
Contract of Work (COW) & Working Agreement on Coal Mining Business (PKP2B) with
forest area map and IPPKH in Indonesia resulted total area of mining permit and contract in
the forest area and IPPKH amounted 38,894,231 Hectares, consisting IUP area of 34,727,334
Hectares; COW area of 2,210,698 Hectares; PKP2B area of 1,956,194 Hectares (Directorate
General of Planning, Ministry of Forestry, 2014). Table 2 illustrates the data overlay
conducted by the Directorate General of Planning, Ministry of Forestry.
Till April 2016, there are 3,982 non-CnC IUP of 10,348 IUP in Indonesia. Only 61.52%
or equivalent to 6,366 IUP is eligible to operate. The rest is shall be curbed and, if needed,
immediately revoked, if has passed the deadline and not take improvement measures.
Evaluation and CnC certification in mineral and coal mining by Directorate General of
Mineral and Coal Mining of MEMR has been going since 2011 and has entered 17th phase
today. Main criteria of CnC assessment cover administrative, territorial, technical, financial
and environmental aspect. Those criteria are translated into the absence of overlapping
(the same/different commodities, such as plantation and forest); comply with spatial
and environmental provisions (not operate in the conservation and protection forest by
conducting open pit mining); meet financial obligations (royalty, land rent, tax, guarantee
fund and others); and other aspects.
In general, the problems of non-CnC IUP can be categorized to two, which are territorial
and administrative problems also mix of those two problems. Classification of problems in
detail is presented in figure 3.
“
Source: Directorate General of Mineral and Coal, MEMR, 2016 (processed)
Figure 3. Classification of the Problems of non-CnC IUP

5. 5 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
Table 2. Overlay of IUP, COW and PKP2B with Forest Area Map and IPPKH – National
Type of Permits
Conservation
Forest
Protection
Forest
Production
Forest
Forest Area
Land for
Other Uses
Grand Total
(A) (B) (C) (D=A+B+C) (E) (D+E)
IUP 1,160,181 3,922,584 17,909,481 22,992,246 11,735,091 34,727,338
Operation Production 18,819 173,196 2,022,352 2,214,367 2,232,884 4,447,250
CnC 10,852 75,068 1,612,090 1,698,010 1,730,613 3,428,623
NonCnC 7,967 98,128 410,262 516,357 502,271 1,018,627
Survey/Exploration 1,141,363 3,749,388 15,887,130 20,777,880 9,498,814 30,276,694
CnC 119,499 1,380,574 8,057,850 9,557,924 5,125,754 14,683,678
NonCnC 1,021,863 2,368,814 7,829,279 11,219,956 4,373,060 15,593,016
COW 110,219 890,541 837,558 1,838,318 372,380 2,210,698
Operation Production 10,166 236,046 285,484 531,696 151,654 683,350
Survey/Exploration 100,053 654,496 552,075 1,306,624 220,725 1,527,348
PKP2B 101,998 123,752 927,171 1,152,921 803,274 1,956,194
Operation Production 10,074 16,695 539,780 566,549 698,355 1,264,904
Survey/Exploration 91,924 107,056 387,390 586,370 104,919 691,290
Grand Total 1,372,398 4,936,878 19,674,211 25,983,486 12,910,744 38,894,231
In particular, the overlay result also shown 1.37 million
Hectares area of IUP/KK/PKP2B located in conservation
forest and 4.93 million Hectares also located in protection
forest. In fact, referring to Law 41/1999 on Forestry, the use
of forest areas for development other than forestry activities
can only be carried out for activities that have a strategic
goal that cannot be circumvented, and are only allowed in
the production forest area and/or protected forest area with
special provisions. While in the conservation forest (especially
in the nature reserve, wilderness zone, and a core zone of the
national park) is completely prohibited for mining activities.
The use of forest area for mining activities are carried out by
thefollowing provisions: (1) Iflocatedin production forestarea,
it shall be conducted through open-pit mining mechanism
and/or underground mining; (2) If located in protection forest
area, it can only be conducted through underground mining
mechanism, with several provisions, including prohibition on
causingthedeclineofgroundlevel,changingthecorefunctions
of the forest area permanently and damaging groundwater
aquifers (underground layers containing water and can drain
the water). The use of forest and forest area basically shall
be adjusted with the principal function of forests, namely
conservation, protection and production functions. Therefore,
the provision for the issuance of permits of forest use shall be
followed by the implementation of all obligations and good
governance, which is accompanied by plans for rehabilitation
and reclamation of forests and land use in order to maintain
the balance of the ecosystem (Abdullah, 2015).
Mining Permit Governance by Local
Government
Local government is a crucial stakeholder in the
implementation of the Korsup Minerba, particularly related
to permit governance, since most of the permits in sub-
national are issued by the Governor and Regent/Mayor. The
division of local government role in the initial design of the
implementation of the Korsup Minerba is specifically shown
in figure 4.
The use of forest and
forest area basically
shall be adjusted
with the principal
function of forests,
namely conservation,
protection and
production
functions.
“
Source: Directorate General Planning, Ministry of Forestry, 2014 (processed)
Figure 4. The Role of Local Government in Korsup Minerba
Source: Korsup Minerba KPK, 2014 (processed)

6. 6 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
Table 3. Total of IUP and CnC Status
No. Province
Total of IUP (2014) Total of IUP (Per April 2016)
IUP CnC IUP Non-CnC IUP CnC IUP Non-CnC
1 NAD 48 102 48 89
2 North Sumatera 67 44 67 44
3 Riau 45 47 52 40
4 Riau Island 114 47 89 31
5 West Sumatera 136 145 142 149
6 Jambi 200 198 185 68
7 South Sumatera 276 83 234 51
8 Bengkulu 91 66 91 61
9 Lampung 148 93 119 78
10 Bangka Belitung 484 601 790 353
11 Banten 27 60 35 53
12 West Java 329 290 329 291
13 Central Java 143 132 142 114
14 Yogyakarta 1 15 1 2
15 East Java 187 150 195 152
16 Bali N/A N/A 0 10
17 West Nusa Tenggara 34 116 38 117
18 East Nusa Tenggara 134 172 145 163
19 Maluku 90 12 93 11
20 West Papua 34 81 38 77
21 Papua 40 85 40 93
22 West Kalimantan 370 312 389 260
23 Central Kalimantan 555 311 580 312
24 South Kalimantan 404 441 429 408
25 East Kalimantan 993 450 856 309
26 North Kalimantan 186 65 127 31
27 Central Sulawesi 244 199 211 114
28 South Sulawesi 172 242 212 218
29 Southeast Sulawesi 314 184 361 101
30 North Sulawesi 70 55 71 54
31 West Sulawesi 45 28 14 17
32 North Maluku 227 108 207 97
33 Gorontalo 23 23 31 14
34 Central N/A N/A 5 0
6,231 4,957 6,366 3,982
Source: MEMR, 2016 (processed)
The role of local government in the permit governance is
mainly carried out through coordinating data and information
related to IUP and its status, rechecking administrative and
territorial requirement, checking the obligations of license holders
such as payment of tax and financial obligation, reclamation and
post-mining rehabilitation fund, as well as other obligations such
as the construction of the smelter and the obligation to manage
related permits such as IPPKH and production permit (after
exploration). Then the next measures taken by local government
includes relinquishment of IUP area and revocation of IUP which
are operated in the conservation/protection forest, has been
expired, also non-CnC IUP. The number of non-CnC IUP status in
every province of Korsup presented in table 3.

7. 7 | POLICY BRIEF www.pwyp-indonesia.org
Development of
integrated data is
crucial to prevent
any problematic
IUP, prevent in-
eligible company to
get mining permit,
and prevent any
violation of technical
and environmental
provisions.
Recommendations
1. Immediately curbing the non-CnC IUP and IUP which is operated in the
conservation and protection forest. The action taken shall be in accordance with
applied regulation also its appointed deadline: Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral
Resources 43/2015 and the provision of Law 23/2014 regarding process of handover of
personnel, funding, facilities and infrastructure as well as document from regency/city
government to provincial government. If the appointed deadline has been passed, but
still there is no significant progress, Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources may take
an action to curb the non-CnC IUP by issuing temporary suspension. This is in line with
Article 152 of Law 4/2009.
2. ImmediatelyissuingPresidentialDecreeonmoratoriumofminingpermit, thus no
more issuance of new permit during the evaluation process until all non-CnC IUPs, which
has yet to meet territorial and administrative requirement, has been curbed or resolved.
Moratorium on mining permit is President Joko Widodo statement in the declaration of a
national movement to rescue wild animals and plants in Karya Island, Seribu Archipelago,
Jakarta.
3. Immediately revitalizing and developing permits database which is also
integratedwithnationalOneMappolicyandstaterevenuemonitoringsystem, by
applying a valid mapping and spatial coordinate system also single identity mechanism
forcompanyregistry.Developmentofintegrateddataiscrucialtopreventanyproblematic
IUP, prevent in-eligible company to get mining permit, and prevent any violation of
technical and environmental provisions. Integrated database system also facilitates
monitoring process of compliance on state revenue payments, environmental and social
obligations, as well as coordination and evaluation across-government agencies.
4. Immediately improving mineral and coal mining permit mechanism both in
national and sub-national, which shall be integrated, in line with one map policy, and
accommodate applied authority division system. The improvement mechanism refers
to improvement of transparency and accountability to prevent corruption, verification
processthatconsiderslocalcommunityrightsandenvironmentalrights,alsoamechanism
that enables to mitigate environment, economic and social risks and impacts.
“
Along with the enactment of Law No. 23/2014 on Local
Government in October 2014, the regency/city no longer
has the authority to issue IUP. Through this policy, the
implementation of government affairs, particularly in term of
the issuance of mining permits only carried out by the central
government and the provincial government. The previous
authority possessed by regency/city is completely drawn
into the province. This delegation of the authority mandates
that the handover of personnel, funding, infrastructure, and
documents (P3D) must be completed within a period of two
years after the law is enacted, which is October 2, 2016.
Thus, the action plan of mining permit (IUP) governance
which is part of Korsup Minerba action plan is in line with
the ongoing process of P3D. Therefore, the MEMR issued
Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral Resources 43/2015 in
order to accelerate the evaluation process of CnC conducted by
the governor, which is no later than 90 working days since its
issuance date. The implementation of the decree is supported
by follow-up to accelerate the process, including the issuance
of Circular Letter of the Directorate General of Mineral and
Coal No.01.E/30/DJB/2016 dated January 5, 2016 which
describes the decree, the Director General of Mineral and Coal
held coordination meeting with the Head of the Energy and
Mineral Resources Provincial Agencies (February 2, 2016), as
well as undertook an inventory of non-CnC IUP recorded in
the Directorate General of Mineral and Coal and need to be
resolved by the governor.
Follow up of Korsup Minerba
Writers
Maryati Abdullah
National Coordinator,
Publish What You Pay Indonesia
Meliana Lumbantoruan
Research and Knowledge Manager,
Publish What You Pay Indonesia
Rizky Ananda Wulan Sapta Rini
Program Manager,
Publish What You Pay Indonesia
References
1. Abdullah, Maryati and Sartin, Jensy. 2015. Tata Kelola, Penerimaan Negara,
dan Dana Bagi Hasil Sektor Kehutanan. (Publish What You Pay Indonesia:
Jakarta).
2. Tim Litbang KPK. 2014. Gerakan Nasional Penyelamatan Sumber Daya
Alam. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
3. ____________, Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang
Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara berikut penjelasannya, Lembaran
Negara RI.
4. ____________, Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2004 tentang
Kehutanan berikut penjelasannya, Lembaran Negara RI.
5. ____________, Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral
Nomor 43 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Evaluasi Penerbitan Izin Usaha
Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara, Lembaran Negara RI.

8. Website : pwyp-indonesia.org
Email : sekretariat@pwyp-indonesia.org
Facebook Fanpage : Publish What You Pay Indonesia
Twitter : @PWYP_INDONESIA
PWYP Indonesia is a coalition of civil societies for transparency and accountability
of extractive resources governance in Indonesia. PWYP Indonesia was established
in 2007, legalised under Indonesia’s law in 2012 as Yayasan Transparansi
Sumberdaya Ekstraktif, and affiliates to the network of PWYP global campaign.
PWYP Indonesia works in transparency and accountability along the chain of
extractive resource, from development phase of contract and mining operation
(publish why you pay and how you extract), production phase and revenue from
industries (publish what you pay), to the spending phase of revenue for sustainable
development and social welfare (publish what you earn and how you spent).