This document summarizes a study on applying progressive collapse design guidelines from the General Services Administration (GSA) to concrete moment frame buildings. The study involved designing 3 buildings with different seismic design classifications and removing first floor columns to analyze the load paths. Demand-capacity ratios were calculated for members. Results showed beams in the lowest seismic class needed minor reinforcement additions, while other members met criteria without additions, demonstrating GSA guidelines can be applied at low cost.
GSA Progressive Collapse Design Guidelines for Concrete Frame Buildings
1. 1
GSA Progressive Collapse Design
Guidelines Applied to
Concrete Moment-Resisting
Frame Buildings
David N. Bilow, P.E., S.E. and
Mahmoud E. Kamara, PhD
Portland Cement Association
Tri-Service Infrastructure Systems
Conference & Exposition
St. Louis, MO - August 2005
6. 6
GSA and DOD Criteria Comparison
Middle of long side,
middle of short side, &
corner column, at each
floor one at a time
Middle of long side,
middle of short side, &
corner column, at
ground level only
Column
Removal
Req’d for Low LOP w/o
vertical tie, Medium LOP,
& High LOP
Required for
nonexempt
Alternate Path
Analysis
Vertical and/or horizontal
tie forces, and ductility
Redundancy, ductility
& continuity
Tie
Requirements
Very Low, Low, Medium,
and High
Exempt or nonexempt
Level of
Protection
(LOP)
DOD
GSA
Requirement
7. 7
Comparison
Linear static, nonlinear static,
or nonlinear dynamic
Linear static
preferred
Method of
Analysis
1.0DL + 0.5LL
Recommended
Upward Loads on
Floor Slabs
1.2DL + 0.5LL + 0.2W
DL + 0.25LL
Loads for
Dynamic Analysis
2.0(1.2DL + 0.5LL) + 0.2W
Adjacent bays & floor above
1.2 DL + 0.5LL for rest of
structure
2(DL +0.25LL)
all bays and
floors
Loads for
Static Analysis
DOD
GSA
Requirement
8. 8
Comparison
Exterior: 1500 ft
2
or 15%
Interior: 3000 ft
2
or 30%
Exterior: 1800 ft
2
Interior: 3600 ft
2
Maximum Extent of
Floor Collapse
Allow plastic hinges &
moment redistribution
DCR 6 2.0 for
typical structures
Acceptance Criteria
specified in ACI 318
1
Strength Reduction
Factor,
1.25
1.25
Material Strength
Increase Factor
DOD
GSA
Requirement
9. 9
PCA Study Objectives
PCA Study Objectives
1. Determine how to apply the GSA
progressive collapse guidelines.
2. Determine additional reinforcement
needed to meet requirements for
reinforced concrete frame buildings.
10. 10
References
References
General Services Administration
General Services Administration
Progressive Collapse
Progressive Collapse
Analysis and Design Guidelines for
Analysis and Design Guidelines for
New Federal Office Buildings and
New Federal Office Buildings and
Major Modernization Projects
Major Modernization Projects
June 2003
June 2003
2000 International Building Code
2000 International Building Code
ACI 318
ACI 318-
-99 Building Code Requirements for
99 Building Code Requirements for
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete
11. 11
Study Procedure
1. Design 3 building structures for live,
dead, wind, and seismic loads
2. Instantaneously remove selected first
floor columns
3. Calculate the alternate path loads per
GSA criteria
4. Apply the GSA loads to the structure
5. Determine moments and forces
6. Determine ultimate unfactored member
capacity
7. Calculate Demand Capacity Ratios
8. Calculate additional reinforcement
13. 13
Loads
Loads
Floor Live Load = 50 psf
Floor Live Load = 50 psf
Superimposed Dead Load = 30 psf
Superimposed Dead Load = 30 psf
Dead Load
Dead Load
Wind Load for 70 MPH
Wind Load for 70 MPH
Seismic Load
Seismic Load -
- 3 Locations
3 Locations
14. 14
Three Reinforced Cast-in-Place Concrete
Moment Frame Buildings
Special moment
frame
.61g
D
Intermediate
moment frame
.094g
C
Ordinary moment
frame
.024g
A
Type of Detailing
Short Period
Acceleration
Seismic
Design Class
16. 16
Analysis and Design
Analysis and Design
Select preliminary member sizes
Select preliminary member sizes
Model in 3 dimensions
Model in 3 dimensions
Static linear elastic analysis
Static linear elastic analysis
Beam and column reinforcement calculated
Beam and column reinforcement calculated
ETABS software version 8.11
ETABS software version 8.11
18. 18
Alternate Load Path Analysis
Alternate Load Path Analysis
Four new models of each of 3 buildings
Four new models of each of 3 buildings
First story columns removed
First story columns removed
Progressive Collapse Alternate Load Path
Gravity Load = 2(DL+0.25LL)
Determine forces and moments (ETABS)
Determine forces and moments (ETABS)
28. 28
DCR for 1
DCR for 1st
st
Story Columns
Story Columns
.44
.44
.65
.65
.84
.84
C12
C12
.59
.59
.76
.76
1.02
1.02
C11
C11
.73
.73
.88
.88
1.23
1.23
C10
C10
X
X
X
X
X
X
C9
C9
Seismic
Seismic
Class D
Class D
Seismic
Seismic
Class C
Class C
Seismic
Seismic
Class A
Class A
Column
Column
29. 29
Summary of Results
235 of
456
55 of 456
All
All
All
Number
Add Rebar
> 2.0
Beams, Class A
Add Rebar
> 2.0
Beams, Class C
None
< 2.0
Beams, Class D
None
< 2.0
Columns
None
< 2.0
Shear
Action
DCR Value
Item
Additional rebar for “A” Structures
Cost = $12,000
30. 30
Applying the GSA criteria to prevent
progressive collapse for concrete
buildings can be accomplished by the
structural engineer using readily
available software and for little additional
construction cost.
Conclusion
Conclusion
31. 31
Contact Information
Contact Information
David N. Bilow, P.E., S.E.
David N. Bilow, P.E., S.E.
Portland Cement Association
Portland Cement Association
dbilow@cement.org
dbilow@cement.org
847
847-
-972
972-
-9064
9064
847
847-
-972
972-
-9065 Fax
9065 Fax
5420 Old Orchard Road
5420 Old Orchard Road
Skokie, IL 60077
Skokie, IL 60077