3. What reading is: McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981
#Keywords:
connectionism
word level, letter level, feature level
visual and acoustic input
higher level input
word superiority effect
4. What reading is: Marslen-Wilson, 1980
#Keywords:
modularism
on-line interactive processing
lexicon, syntax, previous knowledge
context effect
5. What reading is: Levelt, 1992
#Keywords:
global
process
lexicon, lexical concept, phonetic
program
lexical errors
7. General conclusions we can draw:
Reading is the symphony
Little lacks of tuning and synchronism
Many layers
Basic layers are more conditioning
The tuning orchestra hypothesis
8. Maybe they play badly because…
noise comes from a poor training
noise comes from misperception
noise comes from a bad direction
notes are badly written (visual noise)
The tuning orchestra hypothesis
9. They can play badly because…
noise comes from a poor training
noise comes from misperception
noise comes from a bad direction
notes are badly written (visual noise)
person
environment
The tuning orchestra hypothesis
10. 2. How can we convert all this
into an intervention?
11. What an intervention should be
I can help you
Law 170/2010
Specialists
Teachers
Family
Child
12. What an intervention should be
I can help you
Law 170/2010
Why do they always
concentrate on me?
25. Method
Sample: 85 children from 1st to 5th class [M= 56%, F=44%;
LD= 15%, nonLD=85%]
Materials: 5 texts (corresponding to class levels)
LD nonLD
Arial poor good
Dyslexia™ good poor
Hp:
accuracy
speed