PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer Review allows the students writing to clarify their ideas in the content. PhD peer reviewing services exists to validate academic work and helps to increases networking possibilities within research communities by improving the quality of published research. Making the writing process collaborative through peer review helps students to gain experience to learn from one side and to think carefully about the research writing. Peer review is the process that involves various aspects in the manuscript that deem the necessary element for publication. The PhD peer-review process ensures the manuscript is easy to comprehend, do not have any gaps. Manuscript Writing Help determines the reliability and validity of research findings. The reviewer should check for scientific merits its methods and research misconduct. PhD Assistance is a Best Academic Dissertation Writing Service & Consulting Support Company established in 2001. Learn More: https://bit.ly/3o3TrwG Contact Us: Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/ UK NO: +44–1143520021 India No: +91–4448137070 Email: info@phdassistance.com

1. HOW TO PERFORM A PEER REVIEW
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agens, Head, Technical Operations, Phdassistance
Group www.phdassistance.com
Email: info@phdassistance.com
GIVE A STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE FOR
NEW RESEARCHERS IN
REVIEWING THE MANUSCRIPT

2. In-Brief
Introduction
Overview of the Report Format
First Read-Through
What are the considerations in the first read
Spotting potential major flaws
Outline
TODAY'S DISCUSSION
Concluding the first reading
Rejection after the first reading
To save time and review
Carry out the second review
Conclusion

3. In-Brief
PhD Manuscript Pre-Submission Peer Review allows the students writing to clarify their
ideas in the content. PhD peer reviewing services exists to validate academic work
and helps to increases networking possibilities within research communities by
improving the quality of published research. Making the writing process collaborative
through peer review helps students to gain experience to learn from one side and to
think carefully about the research writing.

4. Peer review is the process that involves various
aspects in the manuscript that deem the necessary
element for publication.
The PhD peer-review process ensures the manuscript
is easy to comprehend, do not have any gaps.
Manuscript Writing Help determines the reliability and
validity of research findings.
The reviewer should check for scientific merits its
methods and research misconduct.
Introduction

5. The structuring of the report varies based on the
journal.
Some follow the informal structure, while others
have a formal approach.
PhD Manuscript Peer Review Process carried out
based on the journal submission guidelines and the
requirements of the researchers.
Overview
of the
Report
Format

6. Most of the journals do not provide strict criteria for
submission.
In this case, you have a look at the other articles
published in the journal to get an idea of structuring.
So, you should gain some knowledge about
structuring to rely on your evolving style or get help
from PhD Manuscript Peer Reviewing experts to
have a quality document.
Informal
Structure

7. Other journals require a formal approach and follow
strict submission guidelines.
It is an important stage when there is a presence of
submission guidelines because they will ask you to
address a specific format to research questions.
You need to go on your own to check the submission
guidelines.
So when you want to submit your paper to the specific
journal, there are formal guidelines, and that directs
the structure of your review.
Formal
Structure

8. The first read-through is the skim read which will help
you to form an initial impression of the paper and get
the sense of what is an eventual recommendation made
in the paper that decides the acceptance or rejection.
Professional Pre-Submission Peer Review Help you to
work with the rejected document and gain strength to
paper for publication.
First Read-
Through

9. Peer Review Service for Manuscripts check for the
central question addressed in writing is relevant to the
study and interesting.
Peer review of the thesis is to evaluate the topic novelty
and check for what it does add to the subject area
compared with other published material.
Check whether the conclusions consist of evidence and
argument from standard articles and also check for the
relevance.
Do this paper include tables, figures and to check
whether they add significance to the paper.
What are
the
Considerat
-ions in the
First Read
Contd..

11. It was all about spotting the major flaws that
decrease the quality of the document.
Check for mistakes in the methodology part,
which is the main part of the whole writing.
Check for the information gathered whether this
information provides enough knowledge to the
readers.
Spotting
Potential
Major
Flaws
Contd..

12. Insufficient data
Statistically non-significant variants
Unclear data tables and structures
Data that disagree with your conclusion
Including data that adds arguments little weak
Manuscript Peer Review a Guide check if there is a presence of a critical flaw in the
manuscript and help yo correct it on the early stage, flaws such as,

13. After completing the initial reads, consider all those
major flaws you found.
Write a rough draft of paragraph you came to
known from evaluating the paper make the rough
draft as two paragraphs.
First summarises the research question, second
address the contribution of work.
It will be helpful if the journal has prescribed the
report format.
Concluding
the First
Reading
Contd..

14. It helps to draft to compose your thoughts.
After reviewing the manuscript, you have to decide whether the manuscript
is seriously flawed or it is publishable.

15. If you come to an opinion that the article has
serious flaws, make sure you read the whole
content.
It is mandatory because you may find some
positive aspect that communicated with
other authors.
That could help you with future submission.
Rejection
after the
First
Reading

16. While writing does not rely on uninteresting comment on
the manuscript document.
Try to the group based on the requirement.
Check whether the line number text upon, this will help
you define items again and also aids your review.
Do keep images, graph and tables in a clear view while
writing itself. It will help you evaluate easily.
To Save
Time and
Review

17. One of the reasons for the rejection of the Manuscript
by the Journal is a language issue.
Not every submission is well written in the right format.
If the article is difficult to understand, you should work
with the document.
However, if the language is poor but the central
message is delivered well see if you can improve the
document and fix the problem immediately.
Carry Out
the Second
Review
Contd..
1. Check the
Language

18. Check whether the cited article is central to the
author's argument.
It will help you to find errors from different areas
than before.
There is a need to check to reference for accuracy,
adequacy and balance.
2. Go through
Section by
Section
Contd..

19. If you are writing a formal report, remember to follow
the guidelines.
It will always comprise of a range of questions followed
by comments.
If you're following an informal report format, you
could structure your report in three sections: summary,
major issues, minor issues.
3. How to
Structure
your Report

20. PhD Manuscript Writing Peer review provides a
professional experience for students writing.
Peer review is needed to minimize last-minute
drafting and to cut down common lower-level
writing errors.
Conclusion

21. Contact Us
+44-1143520021
UNITED KINGDOM
INDIA
+91-4448137070
EMAIL
info@phdassistance.com