CMGT 580Introduction to Systems Engineering ManagementClass .docxmary772
CMGT 580
Introduction to Systems Engineering Management
Class 5
Chapter 6 Needs Analysis
Reminder where Needs Analysis fits in process
“there is a feasible approach to fulfilling the need at an affordable cost and within an acceptable level of risk”
Concept Development Stage – Needs Analysis
Originating a new system
Needs-driven example: 1960's new laws for automobiles (fuel economy, safety, pollution control)
Technology-driven new systems (space, computers)
External events (new threats, shift in customer demand, economics)
Since there‘s no preceding phase the inputs come from other sources
Applying the Systems Engineering Method
The focus of attention in this phase is on the system operational objectives and goes no deeper than the subsystem level.”
More detail on next charts
Systems Engineering Method applied to the Needs Analysis Phase
Requirements analysis -- Operations analysis
Clarifying requirements
Functional definition -- Functional analysis
Translating requirements into functions
Allocating requirements
Define interfaces
Physical definition -- Feasibility definition
Develop alternative designs
Perform trade-offs to select a preferred approach
Develop detail for the selected design
Design validation -- Needs validation
Model system environment
Verification
Operations Analysis
Detailed identification of perceived deficiencies in current systems
Obsolescence is a prevalent driving force for new systems
The output of this activity is operational objectives for new system
Functional Analysis
This is an extension of operational studies
Establish if there's a possible technical approach to a system
It's not necessary to visualize a best configuration
Feasibility Definition
Feasibility addresses functional design, physical implementation, cost, external constraints and interactions
No attempt is made to optimize the design
Feasibility can be difficult in technology-driven systems
Needs Validation
Examine the validity of the results of the previous steps
Use an operational effectiveness analysis tool (model) based on a set of scenarios
These simulations are evaluated based on criteria called Measures of Effectiveness
This effectiveness analysis determines if a system concept is feasible and satisfies the operational objectives
MOE and MOP Metrics
Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) – indicates the degree to which the whole system achieves its objectives under specified conditions
Measures of Performance (MOP) – quantitative metric of the whole system’s characteristics or performance of a particular attribute, typically a level of physical performance
Development of Operational Requirements (CONOPS)
Operational distribution or deployment: Where will the system be utilized?
Mission profile or scenario: What must the system do to accomplish its objective?
Performance and related parameters: What are the critical system pa.
Essay Outline There are several vital elements to any successful.docxSALU18
Essay Outline
There are several vital elements to any successful college essay. This handout will define those elements and show you how put them together using an outline.
ESSAY OUTLINE
(Use descriptive vivid details in sentences)
I. Introduction:
Hook, General info about topic, reason for reader to be interested, context, etc.
Must contain a Thesis statement: Detailing what main idea or point of essay will be!
II. Body Paragraph 1 –
1. Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
III. Body Paragraph 2
(Topic Sentence 2: should be the first sentence of this paragraph)
Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
IV. Body Paragraph 3 - Topic Sentence 3:
Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
V. Concluding Paragraph
Re-state thesis:
Summary of main points, return to general context, wrap-up of essay, etc.
Created by
Maren R. Friedman
ptg18221866
ptg18221866
The Practice of System and
Network Administration
Volume 1
Third Edition
ptg18221866
This page intentionally left blank
ptg18221866
The Practice of
System and
Network Administration
Volume 1
Third Edition
Thomas A. Limoncelli
Christina J. Hogan
Strata R. Chalup
Boston • Columbus • Indianapolis • New York • San Francisco • Amsterdam • Cape Town
Dubai • London • Madrid • Milan • Munich • Paris • Montreal • Toronto • Delhi • Mexico City
São Paulo • Sydney • Hong Kong • Seoul • Singapore • Taipei • Tokyo
ptg18221866
Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed
as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trade-
mark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals.
The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed
or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is
assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the
information or programs contained herein.
For information about buying this title in bulk quantities, or for special sales opportunities (which
may include electronic versions; custom cov ...
CMGT 580Introduction to Systems Engineering ManagementClass .docxmary772
CMGT 580
Introduction to Systems Engineering Management
Class 5
Chapter 6 Needs Analysis
Reminder where Needs Analysis fits in process
“there is a feasible approach to fulfilling the need at an affordable cost and within an acceptable level of risk”
Concept Development Stage – Needs Analysis
Originating a new system
Needs-driven example: 1960's new laws for automobiles (fuel economy, safety, pollution control)
Technology-driven new systems (space, computers)
External events (new threats, shift in customer demand, economics)
Since there‘s no preceding phase the inputs come from other sources
Applying the Systems Engineering Method
The focus of attention in this phase is on the system operational objectives and goes no deeper than the subsystem level.”
More detail on next charts
Systems Engineering Method applied to the Needs Analysis Phase
Requirements analysis -- Operations analysis
Clarifying requirements
Functional definition -- Functional analysis
Translating requirements into functions
Allocating requirements
Define interfaces
Physical definition -- Feasibility definition
Develop alternative designs
Perform trade-offs to select a preferred approach
Develop detail for the selected design
Design validation -- Needs validation
Model system environment
Verification
Operations Analysis
Detailed identification of perceived deficiencies in current systems
Obsolescence is a prevalent driving force for new systems
The output of this activity is operational objectives for new system
Functional Analysis
This is an extension of operational studies
Establish if there's a possible technical approach to a system
It's not necessary to visualize a best configuration
Feasibility Definition
Feasibility addresses functional design, physical implementation, cost, external constraints and interactions
No attempt is made to optimize the design
Feasibility can be difficult in technology-driven systems
Needs Validation
Examine the validity of the results of the previous steps
Use an operational effectiveness analysis tool (model) based on a set of scenarios
These simulations are evaluated based on criteria called Measures of Effectiveness
This effectiveness analysis determines if a system concept is feasible and satisfies the operational objectives
MOE and MOP Metrics
Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) – indicates the degree to which the whole system achieves its objectives under specified conditions
Measures of Performance (MOP) – quantitative metric of the whole system’s characteristics or performance of a particular attribute, typically a level of physical performance
Development of Operational Requirements (CONOPS)
Operational distribution or deployment: Where will the system be utilized?
Mission profile or scenario: What must the system do to accomplish its objective?
Performance and related parameters: What are the critical system pa.
Essay Outline There are several vital elements to any successful.docxSALU18
Essay Outline
There are several vital elements to any successful college essay. This handout will define those elements and show you how put them together using an outline.
ESSAY OUTLINE
(Use descriptive vivid details in sentences)
I. Introduction:
Hook, General info about topic, reason for reader to be interested, context, etc.
Must contain a Thesis statement: Detailing what main idea or point of essay will be!
II. Body Paragraph 1 –
1. Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
III. Body Paragraph 2
(Topic Sentence 2: should be the first sentence of this paragraph)
Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
IV. Body Paragraph 3 - Topic Sentence 3:
Use topic sentence that shows main idea or thought of this paragraph
(Then, Show Support)
Detail/example/data/explanation
2. Detail/example/etc.
3. Detail/example/etc.
4. Detail/example/etc.
D. Transition or Closing Sentence
V. Concluding Paragraph
Re-state thesis:
Summary of main points, return to general context, wrap-up of essay, etc.
Created by
Maren R. Friedman
ptg18221866
ptg18221866
The Practice of System and
Network Administration
Volume 1
Third Edition
ptg18221866
This page intentionally left blank
ptg18221866
The Practice of
System and
Network Administration
Volume 1
Third Edition
Thomas A. Limoncelli
Christina J. Hogan
Strata R. Chalup
Boston • Columbus • Indianapolis • New York • San Francisco • Amsterdam • Cape Town
Dubai • London • Madrid • Milan • Munich • Paris • Montreal • Toronto • Delhi • Mexico City
São Paulo • Sydney • Hong Kong • Seoul • Singapore • Taipei • Tokyo
ptg18221866
Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed
as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trade-
mark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals.
The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed
or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is
assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the
information or programs contained herein.
For information about buying this title in bulk quantities, or for special sales opportunities (which
may include electronic versions; custom cov ...
Take a few moments to research the contextual elements surrounding P.docxperryk1
Take a few moments to research the contextual elements surrounding President Kennedy’s inauguration in 1961 and then critically examine this speech:
“Inaugural Address,” by John F. KennedyLinks to an external site.<
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2F*2Fwww.jfklibrary.org*2FAsset-Viewer*2FBqXIEM9F4024ntFl7SVAjA.aspx__*3B!!ACPuPu0!nRyVaN_vHAO7VokwK2jIluLRE3Rbgg_zTzlKs2LU0jy7JJDLOQzoLng5O9kq8Ar2xqOxu6ASoTCCAw*24&data=02*7C01*7Cs3521396*40students.fscj.edu*7C3dbff0e6302e40df260508d83ebef2dd*7C4258f8b94f8d44abb87f21ab35a63470*7C0*7C0*7C637328337145689500&sdata=rjSnrpQbmBtBYheBjJTh*2B57JapV8a8uLTbS*2BwaXQFps*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!ACPuPu0!lzlmNESbzfxzfV0D2RFZGvC0P4JM5SVIIXnoztdLO3J83rBb44XpTJOZcRrT89Wp_du_$
> is made available by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. It is in the public domain.
In a short rhetorical analysis (minimum of four paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion. Please take some time to edit your writing for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission.
Questions for Analysis
1. Which important historical and social realities had an impact on this speech in 1961, and how do these contextual elements figure in President Kennedy’s organization of this speech?
2. What is President Kennedy saying about the nature of human progress (science and technology) and the challenges that we must navigate as a global community? Are these challenges unique to 1961, or relative throughout human history?
3. What are the goals of this speech? Isolate at least three aims of President Kennedy’s address, identify his strategy for supporting these goals, and critique their efficacy. Is this an effective speech? Where applicable, please include a quotation or two from the speech.
In a rhetorical analysis (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion. Please take some time to edit your writing for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission.
Questions for Analysis
1. How does Jefferson organize this important document? How many subdivisions does it have, how do they operate, and how does his approach to organization impact the document’s efficacy?
2. Using at least one citation from the text, analyze Jefferson’s approach to style, voice, and tone. How does he create a sense of urgency in moving toward the conclusion of the work?
3. The complexities of this document’s reach are immense. How many different audiences was Jefferson writing to, and what were the needs of those different groups?
4. In terms of the approaches to formal rhetoric that we studied in the first learning module, which does The Declaration of Independence most closely resemble? .
Table of Contents Section 2 Improving Healthcare Quality from.docxperryk1
Table of Contents Section 2: Improving Healthcare Quality from Within Week 4
Week 4 - Assignment: Interpret Performance Measures
Week 4 - Assignment: Interpret
Performance Measures
Instructions
Course Home Content Dropbox Grades Bookshelf ePortfolio Library The Commons Calendar
You have just been appointed as the administrator of a large managed healthcare organization
with multiple facilities in your state, including facilities in city X and Y (table below). A task your
office is charged with is to reimburse facilities based on how they perform on a set of healthcare
quality measures.
Based on the information provided below, what considerations will you make in your decision-
making process? To complete this assignment, prepare a PowerPoint presentation that
highlights whether or not these two facilities (A and B) should be treated equally when
conducting your assessment. If any, what are the implications of treating these facilities as
equals for the purpose of comparison? Also, address the techniques you will use to ensure these
facilities are assessed fairly.
Measures Facility A Facility B
1
Population
characteristics
City X: Mostly people
with high economic
status and those with
more than high school
education
City Y: Mostly people
with low economic
status, minorities,
high school or less
education
2 Population served All ages
Mostly older adults
and people with
disabilities and
chronic conditions
3
Staff to patient
ratio
1:4 1:8
4
Physician and
nurses continuing
education
Required Required
5 Average number of
hours staff work
per week
50 hours 60 hours
Reflect in ePortfolio
Submissions
No submissions yet. Drag and drop to upload your assignment below.
Drop files here, or click below!
Upload Choose Existing
You can upload files up to a maximum of 1 GB.
Length: 8-10 slides (excluding title slide and references slide)
References: Include a minimum of 3-5 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources referenced on a
separate slide at the end of your presentation.
Your assignment should reflect scholarly academic writing, current APA standards,
Record
Week 4
Course Home Content Dropbox Grades Bookshelf More
Interpreting Performance Improvement Measures
and Benchmarking
As a healthcare administrator/manager, it is in your best
interest to help the facility you serve to move in the
direction charted in the National Quality Strategy (Joshi et
al., 2014). Organizations that fail to meet set standards are
known to face sanctions and sometimes required to close
shop. In consideration of this, you will want to ensure that
the facility you manage is adopting a culture of quality that
puts its patients at the center of healthcare delivery. You will
want to do this by making sure that your facility provides
quality patient care, while also keeping the facility’s
bottom-line healthy.
To ensure you are moving in the right direction, you must
measure and monitor key qual.
More Related Content
Similar to SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICESECOND EDIT.docx
Take a few moments to research the contextual elements surrounding P.docxperryk1
Take a few moments to research the contextual elements surrounding President Kennedy’s inauguration in 1961 and then critically examine this speech:
“Inaugural Address,” by John F. KennedyLinks to an external site.<
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2F*2Fwww.jfklibrary.org*2FAsset-Viewer*2FBqXIEM9F4024ntFl7SVAjA.aspx__*3B!!ACPuPu0!nRyVaN_vHAO7VokwK2jIluLRE3Rbgg_zTzlKs2LU0jy7JJDLOQzoLng5O9kq8Ar2xqOxu6ASoTCCAw*24&data=02*7C01*7Cs3521396*40students.fscj.edu*7C3dbff0e6302e40df260508d83ebef2dd*7C4258f8b94f8d44abb87f21ab35a63470*7C0*7C0*7C637328337145689500&sdata=rjSnrpQbmBtBYheBjJTh*2B57JapV8a8uLTbS*2BwaXQFps*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!ACPuPu0!lzlmNESbzfxzfV0D2RFZGvC0P4JM5SVIIXnoztdLO3J83rBb44XpTJOZcRrT89Wp_du_$
> is made available by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. It is in the public domain.
In a short rhetorical analysis (minimum of four paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion. Please take some time to edit your writing for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission.
Questions for Analysis
1. Which important historical and social realities had an impact on this speech in 1961, and how do these contextual elements figure in President Kennedy’s organization of this speech?
2. What is President Kennedy saying about the nature of human progress (science and technology) and the challenges that we must navigate as a global community? Are these challenges unique to 1961, or relative throughout human history?
3. What are the goals of this speech? Isolate at least three aims of President Kennedy’s address, identify his strategy for supporting these goals, and critique their efficacy. Is this an effective speech? Where applicable, please include a quotation or two from the speech.
In a rhetorical analysis (minimum of eight paragraphs in length), please answer all of the questions below. Your work should include an introduction, a body of supporting evidence, and a conclusion. Please take some time to edit your writing for punctuation, usage, and clarity prior to submission.
Questions for Analysis
1. How does Jefferson organize this important document? How many subdivisions does it have, how do they operate, and how does his approach to organization impact the document’s efficacy?
2. Using at least one citation from the text, analyze Jefferson’s approach to style, voice, and tone. How does he create a sense of urgency in moving toward the conclusion of the work?
3. The complexities of this document’s reach are immense. How many different audiences was Jefferson writing to, and what were the needs of those different groups?
4. In terms of the approaches to formal rhetoric that we studied in the first learning module, which does The Declaration of Independence most closely resemble? .
Table of Contents Section 2 Improving Healthcare Quality from.docxperryk1
Table of Contents Section 2: Improving Healthcare Quality from Within Week 4
Week 4 - Assignment: Interpret Performance Measures
Week 4 - Assignment: Interpret
Performance Measures
Instructions
Course Home Content Dropbox Grades Bookshelf ePortfolio Library The Commons Calendar
You have just been appointed as the administrator of a large managed healthcare organization
with multiple facilities in your state, including facilities in city X and Y (table below). A task your
office is charged with is to reimburse facilities based on how they perform on a set of healthcare
quality measures.
Based on the information provided below, what considerations will you make in your decision-
making process? To complete this assignment, prepare a PowerPoint presentation that
highlights whether or not these two facilities (A and B) should be treated equally when
conducting your assessment. If any, what are the implications of treating these facilities as
equals for the purpose of comparison? Also, address the techniques you will use to ensure these
facilities are assessed fairly.
Measures Facility A Facility B
1
Population
characteristics
City X: Mostly people
with high economic
status and those with
more than high school
education
City Y: Mostly people
with low economic
status, minorities,
high school or less
education
2 Population served All ages
Mostly older adults
and people with
disabilities and
chronic conditions
3
Staff to patient
ratio
1:4 1:8
4
Physician and
nurses continuing
education
Required Required
5 Average number of
hours staff work
per week
50 hours 60 hours
Reflect in ePortfolio
Submissions
No submissions yet. Drag and drop to upload your assignment below.
Drop files here, or click below!
Upload Choose Existing
You can upload files up to a maximum of 1 GB.
Length: 8-10 slides (excluding title slide and references slide)
References: Include a minimum of 3-5 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources referenced on a
separate slide at the end of your presentation.
Your assignment should reflect scholarly academic writing, current APA standards,
Record
Week 4
Course Home Content Dropbox Grades Bookshelf More
Interpreting Performance Improvement Measures
and Benchmarking
As a healthcare administrator/manager, it is in your best
interest to help the facility you serve to move in the
direction charted in the National Quality Strategy (Joshi et
al., 2014). Organizations that fail to meet set standards are
known to face sanctions and sometimes required to close
shop. In consideration of this, you will want to ensure that
the facility you manage is adopting a culture of quality that
puts its patients at the center of healthcare delivery. You will
want to do this by making sure that your facility provides
quality patient care, while also keeping the facility’s
bottom-line healthy.
To ensure you are moving in the right direction, you must
measure and monitor key qual.
Take a company and build a unique solution not currently offered. Bu.docxperryk1
Take a company and build a unique solution not currently offered. Build a
Lean Business Model Canvas.jpg
and present your idea using all 5 frameworks below:
1.Start with Why (by Simon Sinek)
2.Blue Ocean Strategy(by Chan Kim & Renee Mauborgne)
3.Being re"Markable"
4.The Tipping Point (by Malcolm Gladwell)
5.Story Brand (by Donald Miller)
.
Tackling a Crisis Head-onThis week, we will be starting our .docxperryk1
Tackling a Crisis Head-on
This week, we will be starting our work on Assignment 2. Go to
The Wall Street Journal
menu item and find an article about a crisis that occurred at a specific organization in the last year.
Considering the course materials for this week, answer the following:
Describe the crisis faced by the organization.
What communication tactics did the organization use to address its crisis? Refer to Jack and Warren's guidance for dealing with crises.
To what extent, if any, was the organization's crisis communication plan effective?
If you were a senior leader in the organization, would you have responded differently? Why or why not?
This week and next, continue to research this specific crisis so that you can better prepare for Assignment 2.
Post your initial response by Wednesday, midnight of your time zone, and reply to at least 2 of your classmates' initial posts by Sunday, midnight of your time zone.
1st response
The Bank of America Earnings Crisis
In 2020, many businesses experienced notable challenges due to the outbreak of the coronavirus. The Bank of America was no exception based on its reports of firm earnings in 2020. According to Eisen (2021), many large financial organizations in the United States withstood the recession due to COVID-19. However, the author explains that the banks have not been fully protected against the minimal rates brought about by the pandemic. For Bank of America, the outcomes of the COVID-19 outbreak have been felt in many ways, particularly the reduction of earnings by 22%. Additionally, lenders have also experienced significant challenges based on low-interest rates, and Bank of America is among them. Since the financial institution gains earnings on the difference between their lending payments and what they pay to depositors, the bank's interest rates downfall. The earnings crisis also affected the firm's operations in the last quarter of 2020 even though it made considerable profits.
Communication Tactics and Addressing the Crisis
Handling a crisis in organizations presents notable problems for managers and leaders that do not understand the proper ways of solving a crisis. Warren Buffet explains that there are four significant steps a leader can take to address a crisis. First, getting the crisis right and understanding why it happens and what can stop it will help address the crisis. The Bank of America leaders understood that the company needs to introduce measures that will increase the earnings. Secondly, according to Buffet, responding to the crisis fast is also a core step in managing a crisis. The Bank of America did not wait until the last quarter of 2020 to react to the earnings crisis. Rather, they resorted to ensuring the loan demands are stabilized by business consumers and focused more on investment activities (Eisen, 2021). The third and fourth steps based on Warren's advice involve getting the crisis out by dealing with it and getting over with. Th.
take a look at the latest Presidential Order that relates to str.docxperryk1
take a look at the latest Presidential Order that relates to strengthening cybersecurity that relates to critical infrastructure:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-strengthening-cybersecurity-federal-networks-critical-infrastructure/
Let’s look at a real-world scenario and how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plays into it. In the scenario, the United States will be hit by a large-scale, coordinated cyber attack organized by China. These attacks debilitate the functioning of government agencies, parts of the critical infrastructure, and commercial ventures. The IT infrastructure of several agencies are paralyzed, the electric grid in most of the country is shut down, telephone traffic is seriously limited and satellite communications are down (limiting the Department of Defense’s [DOD’s] ability to communicate with commands overseas). International commerce and financial institutions are also severely hit. Please explain how DHS should handle this situation.
please explain how DHS should handle the situation described in the preceding paragraph.
.
Take a look at the sculptures by Giacometti and Moore in your te.docxperryk1
Take a look at the sculptures by Giacometti and Moore in your text. Both pieces are good examples of the relationship between form, content, and subject matter. How do you feel the form of each sculpture expresses the content? What specific characteristics give us clues and communicate meaning?
Select a third work of art from the text and discuss how the form and content relate. Identify at least five visual elements and/or principles of design in your analysis of the third piece.
.
Table of ContentsLOCAL PEOPLE PERCEPTION TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE TOU.docxperryk1
Table of Contents
LOCAL PEOPLE PERCEPTION TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN DENMARK1
Declaration:2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT2
CHAPTER:15
Introduction5
1.1 Background of the study6
1.2 Problem Statement:7
1.3 Research Questions:8
1.4 Research Objectives:8
1.5 Thesis Structure8
CHAPTER:29
Literature review9
2.1 Attitudes of local people towards Sustainable tourism9
2.2 Practices of Sustainable tourism10
2.3 Sustainable tourism development.12
2.4 Involvement of people in Sustainability.14
2.5 Theoretical Framework.15
3.1 Introduction17
3.2 Research Design17
3.3 Sampling method18
3.4 Data collection18
3.5 Measurements and Variables18
3.6 Data analysis19
CHAPTER:1Introduction
Sustainable tourism is a form of tourism, which requires a tourist to respect the local culture, environment, preserving cultural heritage, and supporting local economies by purchasing local products which also benefits the people of that country. Sustainable tourism is a form of development, which is Social development, Economic development and Nature protection. According to the World Tourism Organization, Sustainable tourism is “Tourism that takes full account of its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the industry, the environment, and host communities” UNWTO (2013). Denmark is more concerned about sustainable environment, for instance the Government is aiming at Copenhagen becoming the world’s first carbon-neutral capital by 2025. Government have put high taxation on vehicles, cars so Danes have to think twice before buying or using them. This could be the strategy of the nation. As they are on the way to gain something remarkable, they also have some challenges. The tourism industry has a million of turnover in Danish economy and Danish government puts a high effort in order to make it more sustainable. The big topic could be how the tourist react on it? All the government efforts could be result less if the customer and the business does not act smart. To the Danes, sustainability is a holistic approach that includes renewable energy, water management, waste recycling and green transportation including bicycle culture. Most of the local restaurants use re-usable things during their service also, practices waste deposable for take away.
Tourism is the best way to experience the culture however, damage and waste can occur due to inappropriate behavior of tourists. According to the Denmark statics (2019), every year tourist spends around 128 billion DKK in Denmark. Denmark is very responsible towards environment and most of the hotels are practicing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). For example, Scandic Kødbyen is one of the hotels practicing sustainability, first to implement CSR. It plays a significant support in sustainable tourism business, which includes hotel, restaurant and the service provided sectors. Visit Copenhagen states that 70% of hotels hold an official eco-certification and also known as the hap.
Table of Contents Title PageWELCOMETHE VAJRA.docxperryk1
Table of Contents
Title Page
WELCOME
THE VAJRACCHEDIKA PRAJÑAPARAMITA SUTRA
COMMENTARIES
PART ONE - THE DIALECTICS OF
PRAJÑAPARAMITA
Chapter 1 - THE SETTING
Chapter 2 - SUBHUTI’S QUESTION
Chapter 3 - THE FIRST FLASH OF LIGHTNING
Chapter 4 - THE GREATEST GIFT
Chapter 5 - SIGNLESSNESS
PART TWO - THE LANGUAGE OF
NONATTACHMENT
Chapter 6 - A ROSE IS NOT A ROSE
Chapter 7 - ENTERING THE OCEAN OF REALITY
Chapter 8 - NONATTACHMENT
PART THREE - THE ANSWER IS IN
THE QUESTION
Chapter 9 - DWELLING IN PEACE
Chapter 10 - CREATING A FORMLESS PURE
LAND
Chapter 11 - THE SAND IN THE GANGES
Chapter 12 - EVERY LAND IS A HOLY LAND
Chapter 13 - THE DIAMOND THAT CUTS
THROUGH ILLUSION
Chapter 14 - ABIDING IN NON-ABIDING
Chapter 15 - GREAT DETERMINATION
Chapter 16 - THE LAST EPOCH
Chapter 17 - THE ANSWER IS IN THE QUESTION
PART FOUR - MOUNTAINS AND
RIVERS ARE OUR OWN BODY
Chapter 18 - REALITY IS A STEADILY FLOWING
STREAM
Chapter 19 - GREAT HAPPINESS
Chapter 20 - THIRTY-TWO MARKS
Chapter 21 - INSIGHT-LIFE
Chapter 22 - THE SUNFLOWER
Chapter 23 - THE MOON IS JUST THE MOON
Chapter 24 - THE MOST VIRTUOUS ACT
Chapter 25 - ORGANIC LOVE
Chapter 26 - A BASKET FILLED WITH WORDS
Chapter 27 - NOT CUT OFF FROM LIFE
Chapter 28 - VIRTUE AND HAPPINESS
Chapter 29 - NEITHER COMING NOR GOING
Chapter 30 - THE INDESCRIBABLE NATURE OF
ALL THINGS
Chapter 31 - TORTOISE HAIR AND RABBIT
HORNS
Chapter 32 - TEACHING THE DHARMA
CONCLUSION
Copyright Page
WELCOME
WELCOME
BROTHERS AND SISTERS, please read The Diamond
That Cuts through Illusion with a serene mind, a mind
free from views. It’s the basic sutra for the practice of
meditation. Late at night, it’s a pleasure to recite the
Diamond Sutra alone, in complete silence. The sutra is
so deep and wonderful. It has its own language. The
first Western scholars who obtained the text thought it
was talking nonsense. Its language seems mysterious,
but when you look deeply, you can understand.
Don’t rush into the commentaries or you may be
unduly influenced by them. Please read the sutra first.
You may see things that no commentator has seen. You
can read as if you were chanting, using your clear body
and mind to be in touch with the words. Try to
understand the sutra from your own experiences and
your own suffering. It is helpful to ask, “Do these
teachings of the Buddha have anything to do with my
daily life?” Abstract ideas can be beautiful, but if they
have nothing to do with our life, of what use are they?
So please ask, “Do the words have anything to do with
eating a meal, drinking tea, cutting wood, or carrying
water?”
The sutra’s full name is The Diamond That Cuts
through Illusion, Vajracchedika Prajñaparamita in
Sanskrit. Vajracchedika means “the diamond that cuts
through afflictions, ignorance, delusion, or illusion.” In
China and Vietnam, people generally call it the Diamond
Sutra, emphasizing the word “diamond,” but, in fact,
the phrase “cutting through” is the most important.
Prajñaparamita means “per.
Take a few minutes to reflect on this course. How has your think.docxperryk1
Take a few minutes to reflect on this course. How has your thinking (e.g., worldview, knowledge, etc.) been challenged from what you thought prior to taking this course? What are your thoughts now on the significance of correctly diagnosing mental health disorders? What are your thoughts on the treatment of psychopathology? In general, what thoughts do you have about psychopathology and its impact on an individual and the family?
.
Taiwan The Tail That Wags DogsMichael McDevittAsia Po.docxperryk1
Taiwan: The Tail That Wags Dogs
Michael McDevitt
Asia Policy, Number 1, January 2006, pp. 69-93 (Article)
Published by National Bureau of Asian Research
DOI: 10.1353/asp.2006.0011
For additional information about this article
Access provided by Florida International University (9 Sep 2013 16:14 GMT)
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/asp/summary/v001/1.mcdevitt.html
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/asp/summary/v001/1.mcdevitt.html
asia p olicy, number 1 (january 2006 ), 69–93
Michael McDevitt (Rear Admiral, retired) is Vice President and Director
of the Center for Naval Analyses at the CNA Corporation. These views are his
own and do not represent the views of the CNA Corporation. He can be reached
at <[email protected]>.
keywords: taiwan; china; united states; japan; foreign relations
Taiwan: The Tail That Wags Dogs
Michael McDevitt
[ 70 ]
execu tive summary
asia p olicy
This essay explores how Taiwan has been able to seize the political initiative
from China, Japan, and the United States.
main argument
Taiwan has attained this leverage due to the interrelationship of four factors:
• Strategic considerations stemming from Taiwan’s geographic position lead
Tokyo and Washington to prefer the status quo, while leading China to
strive for reunification. China’s increasing military power, however, may
suggest a Chinese intention to change the status quo.
• Shared democratic values and the fact that the “democracy issue” has great-
ly prolonged the timetable for reunification give Taipei political influence
in both Washington and Tokyo.
• China’s constant threats of force actually empower Taipei in its relationship
with Washington, and cause the United States to plan for the worst.
• Taiwan is a litmus test of U.S. credibility as an ally, a condition that in turn
creates a perception on the island that U.S. military backing is uncondi-
tional.
policy implications
• Taipei’s high-risk diplomatic approach carries with it the very real possibil-
ity of miscalculation, which could easily lead to great power conflict.
• The United States would benefit from exploring with Beijing ways in which
to demilitarize the issue of Taiwan independence so that the threat of great
power conflict over Taiwan is greatly moderated.
• Tensions may eventually lessen substantially if Beijing can be encouraged to
substitute political deterrence for military deterrence.
• In order to ensure that the U.S. position in the region would survive a
Taipei-provoked conflict should the United States choose not to become
directly involved, Washington can undertake extensive talks with Japan de-
signed to ensure that Japan does not lose confidence in Washington.
organization of the essay
The first four sections of the essay respectively explore the four factors of the
complex U.S.-Taiwan-Japan-China relationship outlined above:
Geostrategic Issues and Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
TABLE 1-1 Milestones of Medicine and Medical Education 1700–2015 ■.docxperryk1
TABLE 1-1 Milestones of Medicine and Medical Education 1700–2015 ■ 1700s: Training and apprenticeship under one physician was common until hospitals were founded in the mid-1700s. In 1765, the first medical school was established at the University of Pennsylvania. ■ 1800s: Medical training was provided through internships with existing physicians who often were poorly trained themselves. In the United States, there were only four medical schools, which graduated only a handful of students. There was no formal tuition with no mandatory testing. ■ 1847: The AMA was established as a membership organization for physicians to protect the interests of its members. It did not become powerful until the 1900s when it organized its physician members by county and state medical societies. The AMA wanted to ensure these local societies were protecting physicians’ financial well-being. It also began to focus on standardizing medical education. ■ 1900s–1930s: The medical profession was represented by general or family practitioners who operated in solo practices. A small percentage of physicians were women. Total expenditures for medical care were less than 4% of the gross domestic product. ■ 1904: The AMA created the Council on Medical Education to establish standards for medical education. ■ 1910: Formal medical education was attributed to Abraham Flexner, who wrote an evaluation of medical schools in the United States and Canada indicating many schools were substandard. The Flexner Report led to standardized admissions testing for students called the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), which is still used as part of the admissions process today. ■ 1930s: The healthcare industry was dominated by male physicians and hospitals. Relationships between patients and physicians were sacred. Payments for physician care were personal. ■ 1940s–1960s: When group health insurance was offered, the relationship between patient and physician changed because of third-party payers (insurance). In the 1950s, federal grants supported medical school operations and teaching hospitals. In the 1960s, the Regional Medical Programs provided research grants and emphasized service innovation and provider networking. As a result of the Medicare and Medicaid enactment in 1965, the responsibilities of teaching faculty also included clinical responsibilities. ■ 1970s–1990s: Patient care dollars surpassed research dollars as the largest source of medical school funding. During the 1980s, third-party payers reimbursed academic medical centers with no restrictions. In the 1990s with the advent of managed care, reimbursement was restricted. ■ 2014: According to the 2014 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMAC) annual survey, over 70% of medical schools have or will be implementing policies and programs to encourage primary care specialties for medical school students. TABLE 1-2 Milestones of the Hospital and Healthcare Systems 1820–2015 ■ 1820s: Almshouses or poorhouses, the pr.
Tackling wicked problems A public policy perspective Ple.docxperryk1
Tackling wicked problems : A
public policy perspective
Please note - this is an archived publication.
Commissioner’s foreword
The Australian Public Service (APS) is increasingly being tasked with solving very
complex policy problems. Some of these policy issues are so complex they have
been called ‘wicked’ problems. The term ‘wicked’ in this context is used, not in the
sense of evil, but rather as an issue highly resistant to resolution.
Successfully solving or at least managing these wicked policy problems requires
a reassessment of some of the traditional ways of working and solving problems
in the APS. They challenge our governance structures, our skills base and our
organisational capacity.
It is important, as a first step, that wicked problems be recognised as such.
Successfully tackling wicked problems requires a broad recognition and
understanding, including from governments and Ministers, that there are no quick
fixes and simple solutions.
Tackling wicked problems is an evolving art. They require thinking that is capable
of grasping the big picture, including the interrelationships among the full range of
causal factors underlying them. They often require broader, more collaborative
and innovative approaches. This may result in the occasional failure or need for
policy change or adjustment.
Wicked problems highlight the fundamental importance of the APS building on the
progress that has been made with working across organisational boundaries both
within and outside the APS. The APS needs to continue to focus on effectively
engaging stakeholders and citizens in understanding the relevant issues and in
involving them in identifying possible solutions.
The purpose of this publication is more to stimulate debate around what is
needed for the successful tackling of wicked problems than to provide all the
answers. Such a debate is a necessary precursor to reassessing our current
systems, frameworks and ways of working to ensure they are capable of
responding to the complex issues facing the APS.
I hope that this publication will encourage public service managers to reflect on
these issues, and to look for ways to improve the capacity of the APS to deal
effectively with the complex policy problems confronting us.
Lynelle Briggs
Australian Public Service Commissioner
1. Introduction
Many of the most pressing policy challenges for the APS involve dealing with very
complex problems. These problems share a range of characteristics—they go
beyond the capacity of any one organisation to understand and respond to, and
there is often disagreement about the causes of the problems and the best way to
tackle them. These complex policy problems are sometimes called ‘wicked’
problems.
Usually, part of the solution to wicked problems involves changing the behaviour
of groups of citizens or all citizens. Other key ingredients in solving or at least
managing complex policy problems include successfu.
Tahira Longus Week 2 Discussion PostThe Public Administration.docxperryk1
Tahira Longus Week 2 Discussion Post:
The Public Administrations may entrust the development of collective bargaining activities to bodies created by them, of a strictly technical nature, which will hold their representation in collective bargaining before the corresponding political instructions and without prejudice to the ratification of the agreements reached by the bodies. Government or administrative with competence for it. In addition, public bargaining involves the process of resolving labor-management conflicts. It alsoensuresboth the employee and the employer fair treatment during the negotiation process. The Tables will be validly constituted when, in addition to the representation of the corresponding Administration, and without prejudice to the right of all legitimate trade union organizations to participate in them in proportion to their representatives, such union organizations represent, at least, the absolute majority of the members of the unitary representative bodies in the area in question.
www.ilo.org ›
The Public Administrations may entrust the development of collective bargaining activities to bodies created by them, of a strictly technical nature, which will hold their representation in collective bargaining before the corresponding political instructions and without prejudice to the ratification of the agreements reached by the bodies. Government or administrative with competence for it. In addition, public bargaining involves the process of resolving labor-management conflicts. It also assures both the employee and the employer fair treatment during the negotiation process. The Tables will be validly constituted when, in addition to the representation of the corresponding Administration, and without prejudice to the right of all legitimate trade union organizations to participate in them in proportion to their representatives, such union organizations represent, at least, the absolute majority of the members of the unitary representative bodies in the area in question.
Tara St Laurent Post
.
Tabular and Graphical PresentationsStatistics (exercises).docxperryk1
Tabular and Graphical Presentations
Statistics (exercises)
Aleksandra Pawłowska
April 7, 2020
Glossary (part 1)
Categorical data Labels or names used to identify categories of like items.
Quantitative data Numerical values that indicate how much or how many.
Frequency distribution A tabular summary of data showing the number (fre-
quency) of data values in each of several nonoverlapping classes.
Relative frequency distribution A tabular summary of data showing the fraction
or proportion of data values in each of several nonoverlapping classes.
Percent frequency distribution A tabular summary of data showing the percent-
age of data values in each of several nonoverlapping classes.
Bar chart A graphical device for depicting qualitative data that have been sum-
marized in a frequency, relative frequency, or percent frequency distribution.
Pie chart A graphical device for presenting data summaries based on subdivision
of a circle into sectors that correspond to the relative frequency for each class.
Dot plot A graphical device that summarizes data by the number of dots above
each data value on the horizontal axis.
Aleksandra Pawłowska Tabular and Graphical Presentations
Glossary (part 2)
Histogram A graphical presentation of a frequency distribution, relative frequency
distribution, or percent frequency distribution of quantitative data constructed
by placing the class intervals on the horizontal axis and the frequencies, relative
frequencies, or percent frequencies on the vertical axis.
Cumulative frequency distribution A tabular summary of quantitative data show-
ing the number of data values that are less than or equal to the upper class limit
of each class.
Cumulative relative frequency distribution A tabular summary of quantitative
data showing the fraction or proportion of data values that are less than or equal
to the upper class limit of each class.
Cumulative percent frequency distribution A tabular summary of quantitative
data showing the percentage of data values that are less than or equal to the
upper class limit of each class.
Ogive A graph of a cumulative distribution.
Scatter diagram A graphical presentation of the relationship between two quan-
titative variables. One variable is shown on the horizontal axis and the other
variable is shown on the vertical axis.
Trendline A line that provides an approximation of the relationship between two
variables.
Aleksandra Pawłowska Tabular and Graphical Presentations
Useful tips (part 1)
1 Often the number of classes in a frequency distribution is the same as the
number of categories found in the data. Most statisticians recommend
that classes with smaller frequencies be grouped into an aggregate class
called „other”. Classes with frequencies of 5% or less would most often be
treated in this fashion.
2 The sum of the frequencies in any frequency distribution always equals
the number of observations. The sum of the relative frequencies in any
relative frequency distribution.
Table 4-5 CSFs for ERP ImplementationCritical Success Fact.docxperryk1
Table 4-5 CSFs for ERP Implementation
Critical Success Factors
Description
Management Support
Top management advocacy, provision of adequate resources, and commitment to project
Release of Full-Time Subject Matter Experts (SME)
Release full time on to the project of relevant business experts who provide assistance to the project
Empowered Decision Makers
The members of the project team(s) must be empowered to make quick decisions
Deliverable Dates
At planning stage, set realistic milestones and end date
Champion
Advocate for system who is unswerving in promoting the benefits of the new system
Vanilla ERP
Minimal customization and uncomplicated option selection
Smaller Scope
Fewer modules and less functionality implemented, smaller user group, and fewer site(s)
Definition of Scope and Goals
The steering committee determines the scope and objectives of the project in advance and then adheres to it
Balanced Team
Right mix of business analysts, technical experts, and users from within the implementation company and consultants from external companies
Commitment to Change
Perseverance and determination in the face of inevitable problems with implementation
Question 11 pts
The melody of a piece of music is
the harmony
the rhythm
the tune
the chords
Flag this Question
Question 21 pts
Chords are an element of
melody
rhythm
all of the above
harmony
Flag this Question
Question 31 pts
The distance between pitches is called
a space
an interval
a beat
all of the above
Flag this Question
Question 41 pts
Rhythmic organization in pre-Conquest Native American music was
divisive
in duple meter
in triple meter
additive
Flag this Question
Question 51 pts
Pan-Indian music often uses:
all of the above
the Navajo language
vocables
English
Flag this Question
Question 61 pts
Pre-conquest Native American musicians were primarily valued for their expertise in spiritual matters.
True
False
Flag this Question
Question 71 pts
Traditional Native American melodies have a wide melodic range
True
False
Flag this Question
Question 81 pts
Early Native American music features intervals that are:
rhythmically longer
rhythmically shorter
farther apart than what we have in the western system
closer together than what we have in the western system
Flag this Question
Question 91 pts
In the early New England colonies folk songs were:
derived from Irish melodies
derived from English melodies
all of the above
usually sung without accompaniment
Flag this Question
Question 101 pts
Early Anglo - American folks songs were:
often in polymeters
often in triple meter
often in duple meter
often in free meter
Flag this Question
Question 111 pts
Of the following, which is not a form of early Anglo-American folk songs?
ballads
lyric songs
work songs
jubilees
Flag this Question
Question 121 pts
Of the following which instrument was not brought to the Americas by European colonists?
clavichord
recorder
viol
banjo
Flag this Question
Quest.
TableOfContentsTable of contents with hyperlinks for this document.docxperryk1
TableOfContentsTable of contents with hyperlinks for this documentExcluding standard worksheets that come with the original dataSheet namePurposeNotesOnDataPrep!A1Tips and tricks for students in doing data analysis in ExcelSalaryPivotTable!A1Using a histogram of salary to compare other variables in terms of chunks of salaryDescriptiveStatsForFrequency!A1Example of producing descriptive stats for chunks of a numeric variable (grouping, frequency table as 'categories')VariableDescriptiveStatsPHStat!A1Example of descriptive stats produced by PHStat and then edited, items removed that are not neededCorrelations!A1Instructor reference for how all variables are inter-relatedRegressionAge!A1Example of regression output highighting output to pay attention toSPSSRegressionAllEnter!A1Instructor reference - regressing salary on all independent variables to discern stongest, independent predictorsPivotTableCreatePercentPolygon!A1Example of comparing distributions between two categories with different number of cases or different scales, i.e., version of percent polygonAnalysis resultsGender univariate descriptive statisticsGenderAnalysis!A1Gender/Salary; Gender/Job Grade Classification analysis; Gender/other independent variables Salary histogram, distributionCompare gender/salary descriptive statisticsGenderCompareDescriptives!A1Comparison Table gender descriptive statistics in terms of all variables. This might be something worth doing.EthnicitySalaryAnalysis!A1Ethnicity/Salary analysisOptionalEthnicitySalaryAnalysis!A1Optional ethnicity/salary analysis - distribution of ethnicity over chunks of salary, percent polygonEthnicityJGClassAnalysis!A1Ethnicity/Job Grade Classification analysisAgeSalaryAnalysis!A1Age/Salary analysisAgeJobGradeClassAnalysis!A1Age/Job grade classification analysisYearsWorkedSalaryAnalysis!A1Years worked/Salary analysisYears worked/Job grade classification analysisRelationship between endogenous variablesJob grade classification/Salary analysisRelationship between independent variablesPercentPolygonGenderYearsWorked!A1Compare years worked distribution by gender; Example of comparing distributions between two categories with different number of cases or different scales, i.e., version of percent polygon Standard sheets that come with the dataVariable INFO'!A1Information on variablesHuman Resources DATA'!A1DataCross-Class-Table'!A1Summary Table'!A1Histogram!A1% Polygons 2 Groups'!A1Freq. & % Distribution'!A1
Variable INFOTableOfContents!A1The data are a random sample of 120 responses to a survey conducted by the VP of Human Resources at a large company.Source:INFO 501 class at Montclair State UniversityVariablesSalaryin thousands of dollars (K)Age in years YrsWorkin years JGClassjob-grade classification of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 (lowest skill job to highest skill job)Ethnicity1=Minority0=Not MinorityGender(Male, Female)Named ranges created in this worksheet - use these names to address the data more quickly then manually selecting dat.
Tajfel and Turner (in chapter two of our reader) give us the followi.docxperryk1
Tajfel and Turner (in chapter two of our reader) give us the following definition of Social Identity Theory: "SIT proposes that individuals make sense of their social environment by categorizing themselves and others into groups that can be contrasted with others" (Oksanen et al., 2014). SIT brings order to chaos, you might say, in that individuals define themselves as being different from everyone else.
Considering what we have read about the perpetrators of group violence, how do you suppose that it is that people make the leap from their own social identity to group violence? What social and psychological mechanisms are at work that would go from simple categorization to overt violence?
.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICESECOND EDIT.docx
1. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
PRINCIPLES AND
PRACTICE
SECOND EDITION
Alexander Kossiakoff
William N. Sweet
Samuel J. Seymour
Steven M. Biemer
A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. PUBLICATION
ffirs02.indd iiiffirs02.indd iii 2/8/2011 11:05:45
AM2/8/2011 11:05:45 AM
ffirs04.indd viffirs04.indd vi 2/8/2011 11:05:47
AM2/8/2011 11:05:47 AM
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING
PRINCIPLES AND
PRACTICE
ffirs.indd iffirs.indd i 2/8/2011 11:05:44 AM2/8/2011
11:05:44 AM
3. reserved.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
Published simultaneously in Canada
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
scanning, or otherwise, except as
permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States
Copyright Act, without either the prior
written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through
payment of the appropriate per-copy fee
to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400,
fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com.
Requests to the Publisher for permission
should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken,
NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at
http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher
and author have used their best efforts in
preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties
with respect to the accuracy or
completeness of the contents of this book and specifi cally
disclaim any implied warranties of
merchantability or fi tness for a particular purpose. No warranty
may be created or extended by sales
representatives or written sales materials. The advice and
strategies contained herein may not be suitable
for your situation. You should consult with a professional where
appropriate. Neither the publisher nor
author shall be liable for any loss of profi t or any other
commercial damages, including but not limited to
4. special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
For general information on our other products and services or
for technical support, please contact our
Customer Care Department within the United States at (800)
762-2974, outside the United States at
(317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic
formats. Some content that appears in print may
not be available in electronic formats. For more information
about Wiley products, visit our web site at
www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Systems engineering : principles and practice/Alexander
Kossiakoff ... [et al.].—2nd ed.
p. cm.—(Wiley series in systems engineering and
management; 67)
Rev. ed. of: Systems engineering: principles and
practices/Alexander
Kossiakoff, William N. Sweet. 2003.
ISBN 978-0-470-40548-2 (hardback)
1. Systems engineering. I. Kossiakoff, Alexander, 1945– II.
Title.
TA168.K68 2010
620.001′171–dc22
2010036856
Printed in the United States of America
oBook ISBN: 9781118001028
ePDF ISBN: 9781118001011
ePub ISBN: 9781118009031
5. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ffirs03.indd ivffirs03.indd iv 2/8/2011 11:05:46
AM2/8/2011 11:05:46 AM
To Alexander Kossiakoff,
who never took “ no ” for an answer and refused to believe
that anything was
impossible. He was an extraordinary problem solver, instructor,
mentor, and
friend.
Samuel J. Seymour
Steven M. Biemer
ffirs04.indd vffirs04.indd v 2/8/2011 11:05:47 AM2/8/2011
11:05:47 AM
ffirs04.indd viffirs04.indd vi 2/8/2011 11:05:47
AM2/8/2011 11:05:47 AM
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xiii
LIST OF TABLES xvii
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION xix
6. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION xxiii
PART I FOUNDATIONS OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 1
1 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN
SYSTEMS 3
1.1 What Is Systems Engineering? 3
1.2 Origins of Systems Engineering 5
1.3 Examples of Systems Requiring Systems Engineering 10
1.4 Systems Engineering as a Profession 12
1.5 Systems Engineer Career Development Model 18
1.6 The Power of Systems Engineering 21
1.7 Summary 23
Problems 25
Further Reading 26
2 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE 27
2.1 Systems Engineering Viewpoint 27
2.2 Perspectives of Systems Engineering 32
2.3 Systems Domains 34
2.4 Systems Engineering Fields 35
2.5 Systems Engineerng Approaches 36
7. 2.6 Systems Engineering Activities and Products 37
2.7 Summary 38
Problems 39
Further Reading 40
CONTENTS
vii
ftoc.indd viiftoc.indd vii 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
viii CONTENTS
3 STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS 41
3.1 System Building Blocks and Interfaces 41
3.2 Hierarchy of Complex Systems 42
3.3 System Building Blocks 45
3.4 The System Environment 51
3.5 Interfaces and Interactions 58
3.6 Complexity in Modern Systems 60
3.7 Summary 64
Problems 66
8. Further Reading 67
4 THE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 69
4.1 Systems Engineering through the System Life Cycle 69
4.2 System Life Cycle 70
4.3 Evolutionary Characteristics of the Development Process 82
4.4 The Systems Engineering Method 87
4.5 Testing throughout System Development 103
4.6 Summary 106
Problems 108
Further Reading 109
5 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT 111
5.1 Managing System Development and Risks 111
5.2 WBS 113
5.3 SEMP 117
5.4 Risk Management 120
5.5 Organization of Systems Engineering 128
5.6 Summary 132
Problems 133
Further Reading 134
9. PART II CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STAGE 137
6 NEEDS ANALYSIS 139
6.1 Originating a New System 139
6.2 Operations Analysis 146
6.3 Functional Analysis 151
6.4 Feasibility Defi nition 153
ftoc.indd viiiftoc.indd viii 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
CONTENTS ix
6.5 Needs Validation 155
6.6 System Operational Requirements 158
6.7 Summary 162
Problems 163
Further Reading 164
7 CONCEPT EXPLORATION 165
7.1 Developing the System Requirements 165
7.2 Operational Requirements Analysis 170
7.3 Performance Requirements Formulation 178
10. 7.4 Implementation of Concept Exploration 185
7.5 Performance Requirements Validation 189
7.6 Summary 191
Problems 193
Further Reading 194
8 CONCEPT DEFINITION 197
8.1 Selecting the System Concept 197
8.2 Performance Requirements Analysis 201
8.3 Functional Analysis and Formulation 206
8.4 Functional Allocation 212
8.5 Concept Selection 214
8.6 Concept Validation 217
8.7 System Development Planning 219
8.8 Systems Architecting 222
8.9 System Modeling Languages: Unifi ed Modeling Language
(UML) and Systems Modeling Language (SysML) 228
8.10 Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) 243
8.11 System Functional Specifi cations 246
8.12 Summary 247
11. Problems 250
Further Reading 252
9 DECISION ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT 255
9.1 Decision Making 256
9.2 Modeling throughout System Development 262
9.3 Modeling for Decisions 263
9.4 Simulation 272
ftoc.indd ixftoc.indd ix 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
x CONTENTS
9.5 Trade-Off Analysis 282
9.6 Review of Probability 295
9.7 Evaluation Methods 299
9.8 Summary 308
Problems 311
Further Reading 312
PART III ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT STAGE 315
10 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 317
10.1 Reducing Program Risks 317
12. 10.2 Requirements Analysis 322
10.3 Functional Analysis and Design 327
10.4 Prototype Development as a Risk Mitigation Technique
333
10.5 Development Testing 340
10.6 Risk Reduction 349
10.7 Summary 350
Problems 352
Further Reading 354
11 SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 355
11.1 Coping with Complexity and Abstraction 356
11.2 Nature of Software Development 360
11.3 Software Development Life Cycle Models 365
11.4 Software Concept Development: Analysis and Design 373
11.5 Software Engineering Development: Coding and Unit Test
385
11.6 Software Integration and Test 393
11.7 Software Engineering Management 396
11.8 Summary 402
13. Problems 405
Further Reading 406
12 ENGINEERING DESIGN 409
12.1 Implementing the System Building Blocks 409
12.2 Requirements Analysis 414
12.3 Functional Analysis and Design 416
12.4 Component Design 419
12.5 Design Validation 432
ftoc.indd xftoc.indd x 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
CONTENTS xi
12.6 CM 436
12.7 Summary 439
Problems 441
Further Reading 442
13 INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 443
13.1 Integrating, Testing, and Evaluating the Total System 443
13.2 Test Planning and Preparation 450
13.3 System Integration 455
14. 13.4 Developmental System Testing 462
13.5 Operational Test and Evaluation 467
13.6 Summary 475
Problems 478
Further Reading 478
PART IV POSTDEVELOPMENT STAGE 481
14 PRODUCTION 483
14.1 Systems Engineering in the Factory 483
14.2 Engineering for Production 485
14.3 Transition from Development to Production 489
14.4 Production Operations 492
14.5 Acquiring a Production Knowledge Base 497
14.6 Summary 500
Problems 502
Further Reading 503
15 OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT 505
15.1 Installing, Maintaining, and Upgrading the System 505
15.2 Installation and Test 507
15.3 In-Service Support 512
15. 15.4 Major System Upgrades: Modernization 516
15.5 Operational Factors in System Development 520
15.6 Summary 522
Problems 523
Further Reading 524
INDEX 525
ftoc.indd xiftoc.indd xi 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
ftoc.indd xiiftoc.indd xii 2/8/2011 11:05:50 AM2/8/2011
11:05:50 AM
xiii
1.1 Career opportunities and growth 14
1.2a Technical orientation phase diagram 16
1.2b Technical orientation population density distribution
16
1.3a Systems engineering (SE) career elements derived from
quality work
experiences 19
1.3b Components of employer development of systems
engineers 19
1.4 “ T ” model for systems engineer career development
16. 20
2.1a Performance versus cost 29
2.1b Performance/cost versus cost 29
2.2 The ideal missile design from the viewpoint of various
specialists 31
2.3 The dimensions of design, systems engineering, and
project planning
and control 32
2.4 Systems engineering domains 34
2.5 Examples of systems engineering fi elds 35
2.6 Examples of systems engineering approaches 36
2.7 Life cycle systems engineering view 37
3.1 Knowledge domains of systems engineer and design
specialist 45
3.2 Context diagram 53
3.3 Context diagram for an automobile 54
3.4 Environments of a passenger airliner 56
3.5 Functional interactions and physical interfaces 59
3.6 Pyramid of system hierarchy 63
4.1 DoD system life cycle model 71
4.2 System life cycle model 72
4.3 Principal stages in system life cycle 75
4.4 Concept development phases of system life cycle 76
4.5 Engineering development phases in system life cycle 78
4.6 Principal participants in a typical aerospace system
development 86
4.7 DoD MIL - STD499B 90
4.8 IEEE - 1220 systems engineering process 90
4.9 EIA - 632 systems engineering process 91
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
fbetw01.indd xiiifbetw01.indd xiii 2/9/2011 6:29:47
PM2/9/2011 6:29:47 PM
17. xiv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
4.10 ISO - 15288 Systems engineering process 92
4.11 Systems engineering method top - level fl ow diagram
92
4.12 Systems engineering method fl ow diagram 94
4.13 Spiral model of the defense system life cycle 104
5.1 Systems engineering as a part of project management
112
5.2 Place of SEMP in program management plans 118
5.3 Variation of program risk and effort throughout system
development 121
5.4 Example of a risk mitigation waterfall chart 122
5.5 An example of a risk cube display 124
6.1 Needs analysis phase in the system life cycle 140
6.2 Needs analysis phase fl ow diagram 147
6.3 Objectives tree structure 150
6.4 Example objectives tree for an automobile 151
6.5 Analysis pyramid 156
7.1 Concept exploration phase in system life cycle 166
7.2 Concept exploration phase fl ow diagram 170
7.3 Simple requirements development process 171
7.4 Triumvirate of conceptual design 175
7.5 Hierarchy of scenarios 177
7.6 Function category versus functional media 181
8.1 Concept defi nition phase in system life cycle 198
8.2 Concept defi nition phase fl ow diagram 202
8.3 IDEF0 functional model structure 208
8.4 Functional block diagram of a standard coffeemaker 210
8.5 Traditional view of architecture 223
8.6 DODAF version 2.0 viewpoints 227
8.7 UML models 229
8.8 Use case diagram 231
8.9 UML activity diagram 233
18. 8.10 UML sequence diagram 234
8.11 Example of a class association 235
8.12 Example of a class generalization association 236
8.13 Class diagram of the library check - out system 237
8.14 SysML models 237
8.15 SysML requirements diagram 238
8.16 SysML block defi nition 240
8.17 SysML block associations 241
8.18a SysML functional hierarchy tree 242
8.18b SysML activity diagram 242
8.19 Baker ’ s MDSD subprocesses 244
8.20 Baker ’ s information model for MDSD 244
9.1 Basic decision - making process 256
9.2 Traditional hierarchical block diagram 265
9.3 Context diagram of a passenger aircraft 266
9.4 Air defense functional fl ow block diagram 267
fbetw01.indd xivfbetw01.indd xiv 2/9/2011 6:29:47
PM2/9/2011 6:29:47 PM
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xv
9.5 System effectiveness simulation 275
9.6 Hardware - in - the - loop simulation 277
9.7 Virtual reality simulation 280
9.8 Candidate utility functions 289
9.9 Criteria profi le 290
9.10 Union of two events 297
9.11 Conditional events 297
9.12 AHP example 300
9.13 AHP results 301
9.14 Decision tree example 302
9.15 Decision path 302
9.16 Decision tree solved 303
19. 9.17 Utility function 304
9.18 Decision tree solved with a utility function 304
9.19 Example of cost - effectiveness integration 305
9.20 QFD house of quality 307
10.1 Advanced development phase in system life cycle 318
10.2 Advanced development phase fl ow diagram 321
10.3 Test and evaluation process of a system element 345
11.1 IEEE software systems engineering process 357
11.2 Software hierarchy 359
11.3 Notional 3 - tier architecture 359
11.4 Classical waterfall software development cycle 367
11.5 Software incremental model 369
11.6 Spiral model 370
11.7 State transition diagram in concurrent development
model 371
11.8 User needs, software requirements and specifi cations
376
11.9 Software generation process 376
11.10 Principles of modular partitioning 379
11.11 Functional fl ow block diagram example 381
11.12 Data fl ow diagram: library checkout 381
11.13 Robustness diagram: library checkout 384
12.1 Engineering design phase in system life cycle 410
12.2 Engineering design phase in relation to integration and
evaluation 411
12.3 Engineering design phase fl ow diagram 413
13.1 Integration and evaluation phase in system life cycle
445
13.2 Integration and evaluation phase in relation to
engineering design 445
13.3 System test and evaluation team 446
13.4 System element test confi guration 456
13.5 Subsystems test confi guration 459
13.6a Operation of a passenger airliner 469
13.6b Operational testing of an airliner 469
13.7 Test realism versus cost 471
20. 14.1 Production phase in system life cycle 484
14.2 Production phase overlap with adjacent phases 485
fbetw01.indd xvfbetw01.indd xv 2/9/2011 6:29:47
PM2/9/2011 6:29:47 PM
xvi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
14.3 Production operation system 494
15.1 Operations and support phase in system life cycle 506
15.2 System operations history 507
15.3 Non - disruptive installation via simulation 510
15.4 Non - disruptive installation via a duplicate system 511
fbetw01.indd xvifbetw01.indd xvi 2/9/2011 6:29:47
PM2/9/2011 6:29:47 PM
xvii
1.1 Examples of Engineered Complex Systems: Signal and
Data Systems 11
1.2 Examples of Engineered Complex Systems: Material and
Energy
Systems 11
2.1 Comparison of Systems Perspectives 33
2.2 Systems Engineering Activities and Documents 38
3.1 System Design Hierarchy 43
3.2 System Functional Elements 47
3.3 Component Design Elements 49
3.4 Examples of Interface Elements 60
4.1 Evolution of System Materialization through the System
21. Life Cycle 84
4.2 Evolution of System Representation 88
4.3 Systems Engineering Method over Life Cycle 102
5.1 System Product WBS Partial Breakdown Structure 114
5.2 Risk Likelihood 125
5.3 Risk Criticality 125
5.4 Sample Risk Plan Worksheet 128
6.1 Status of System Materialization at the Needs Analysis
Phase 143
7.1 Status of System Materialization of the Concept
Exploration Phase 168
8.1 Status of System Materialization of Concept Defi nition
Phase 200
8.2 Use Case Example — “ Check - out Book ” 232
9.1 Decision Framework 259
9.2 Simon’s Decision Process 261
9.3 Weighted Sum Integration of Selection Criteria 288
9.4 Weighted Sum of Actual Measurement 289
9.5 Weighted Sum of Utility Scores 290
9.6 Trade-Off Matrix Example 293
10.1 Status of System Materialization at the Advanced
Development Phase 320
10.2 Development of New Components 326
10.3 Selected Critical Characteristics of System Functional
Elements 329
10.4 Some Examples of Special Materials 335
11.1 Software Types 361
LIST OF TABLES
fbetw02.indd xviifbetw02.indd xvii 2/9/2011 6:29:55
PM2/9/2011 6:29:55 PM
xviii LIST OF TABLES
22. 11.2 Categories of Software - Dominated Systems 362
11.3 Differences between Hardware and Software 364
11.4 Systems Engineering Life Cycle and the Waterfall Model
368
11.5 Commonly Used Computer Languages 387
11.6 Some Special - Purpose Computer Languages 388
11.7 Characteristics of Prototypes 390
11.8 Comparison of Computer Interface Modes 391
11.9 Capability Levels 398
11.10 Maturity Levels 399
12.1 Status of System Materialization at the Engineering
Design Phase 412
12.2 Confi guration Baselines 437
13.1 Status of System Materialization at the Integration and
Evaluation
Phase 448
13.2 System Integration and Evaluation Process 449
13.3 Parallels between System Development and Test and
Evaluation
(T & E) Planning 451
fbetw02.indd xviiifbetw02.indd xviii 2/9/2011 6:29:55
PM2/9/2011 6:29:55 PM
xix
It is an incredible honor and privilege to follow in the
footsteps of an individual who
had a profound infl uence on the course of history and the fi eld
of systems engineering.
Since publication of the fi rst edition of this book, the fi eld of
systems engineering has
23. seen signifi cant advances, including a signifi cant increase in
recognition of the disci-
pline, as measured by the number of conferences, symposia,
journals, articles, and
books available on this crucial subject. Clearly, the fi eld has
reached a high level of
maturity and is destined for continued growth. Unfortunately,
the fi eld has also seen
some sorrowful losses, including one of the original authors,
Alexander Kossiakoff,
who passed away just 2 years after the publication of the book.
His vision, innovation,
excitement, and perseverance were contagious to all who
worked with him and he is
missed by the community. Fortunately, his vision remains and
continues to be the
driving force behind this book. It is with great pride that we
dedicate this second edition
to the enduring legacy of Alexander Ivanovitch Kossiakoff.
ALEXANDER KOSSIAKOFF, 1914 – 2005
Alexander Kossiakoff, known to so many as “ Kossy, ” gave
shape and direction to the
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory as its
director from 1969 to
1980. His work helped defend our nation, enhance the
capabilities of our military,
pushed technology in new and exciting directions, and bring
successive new genera-
tions to an understanding of the unique challenges and
opportunities of systems engi-
neering. In 1980, recognizing the need to improve the training
and education of technical
professionals, he started the master of science degree program
at Johns Hopkins
24. University in Technical Management and later expanded it to
Systems Engineering,
one of the fi rst programs of its kind.
Today, the systems engineering program he founded is the
largest part - time gradu-
ate program in the United States, with students enrolled from
around the world in
classroom, distance, and organizational partnership venues; it
continues to evolve as
the fi eld expands and teaching venues embrace new
technologies, setting the standard
for graduate programs in systems engineering. The fi rst edition
of the book is the foun-
dational systems engineering textbook for colleges and
universities worldwide.
PREFACE TO THE SECOND
EDITION
fpref01.indd xixfpref01.indd xix 2/8/2011 3:49:23
PM2/8/2011 3:49:23 PM
xx PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
OBJECTIVES OF THE SECOND EDITION
Traditional engineering disciplines do not provide the training,
education, and experi-
ence necessary to ensure the successful development of a large,
complex system
program from inception to operational use. The advocacy of the
systems engineering
viewpoint and the goal for the practitioners to think like a
25. systems engineer are still
the major premises of this book.
This second edition of Systems Engineering Principles and
Practice continues to
be intended as a graduate - level textbook for courses
introducing the fi eld and practice
of systems engineering. We continue the tradition of utilizing
models to assist students
in grasping abstract concepts presented in the book. The fi ve
basic models of the fi rst
edition are retained, with only minor refi nements to refl ect
current thinking. Additionally,
the emphasis on application and practice is retained throughout
and focuses on students
pursuing their educational careers in parallel with their
professional careers. Detailed
mathematics and other technical fi elds are not explored in
depth, providing the greatest
range of students who may benefi t, nor are traditional
engineering disciplines provided
in detail, which would violate the book ’ s intended scope.
The updates and additions to the fi rst edition revolve around
the changes occurring
in the fi eld of systems engineering since the original
publication. Special attention was
made in the following areas :
• The Systems Engineer ’ s Career. An expanded
discussion is presented on
the career of the systems engineer. In recent years, systems
engineering
has been recognized by many companies and organizations as a
separate fi eld,
and the position of “ systems engineer ” has been formalized.
26. Therefore, we
present a model of the systems engineer ’ s career to help guide
prospective
professionals.
• The Systems Engineering Landscape. The only new
chapter introduced in the
second edition is titled by the same name and reinforces the
concept of the
systems engineering viewpoint. Expanded discussions of the
implications of this
viewpoint have been offered.
• System Boundaries. Supplemental material has been
introduced defi ning and
expanding our discussion on the concept of the system
boundary. Through the
use of the book in graduate - level education, the authors
recognized an inherent
misunderstanding of this concept — students in general have
been unable to rec-
ognize the boundary between the system and its environment.
This area has been
strengthened throughout the book.
• System Complexity. Signifi cant research in the area
of system complexity is now
available and has been addressed. Concepts such as system of
systems engineer-
ing, complex systems management, and enterprise systems
engineering are intro-
duced to the student as a hierarchy of complexity, of which
systems engineering
forms the foundation.
• Systems Architecting. Since the original publication,
27. the fi eld of systems archi-
tecting has expanded signifi cantly, and the tools, techniques,
and practices of this
fpref01.indd xxfpref01.indd xx 2/8/2011 3:49:23
PM2/8/2011 3:49:23 PM
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION xxi
fi eld have been incorporated into the concept exploration and
defi nition chapters.
New models and frameworks for both traditional structured
analysis and object -
oriented analysis techniques are described and examples are
provided, including
an expanded description of the Unifi ed Modeling Language and
the Systems
Modeling Language. Finally, the extension of these new
methodologies, model -
based systems engineering, is introduced.
• Decision Making and Support. The chapter on systems
engineering decision
tools has been updated and expanded to introduce the systems
engineering
student to the variety of decisions required in this fi eld, and the
modern pro-
cesses, tools, and techniques that are available for use. The
chapter has also been
moved from the original special topics part of the book.
• Software Systems Engineering. The chapter on
software systems engineering has
been extensively revised to incorporate modern software
28. engineering techniques,
principles, and concepts. Descriptions of modern software
development life
cycle models, such as the agile development model, have been
expanded to
refl ect current practices. Moreover, the section on capability
maturity models has
been updated to refl ect the current integrated model. This
chapter has also been
moved out of the special topics part and introduced as a full
partner of advanced
development and engineering design.
In addition to the topics mentioned above, the chapter
summaries have been refor-
matted for easier understanding, and the lists of problems and
references have been
updated and expanded. Lastly, feedback, opinions, and
recommendations from graduate
students have been incorporated where the wording or
presentation was awkward or
unclear.
CONTENT DESCRIPTION
This book continues to be used to support the core courses of
the Johns Hopkins
University Master of Science in Systems Engineering program
and is now a primary
textbook used throughout the United States and in several other
countries. Many pro-
grams have transitioned to online or distance instruction; the
second edition was written
with distance teaching in mind, and offers additional examples.
The length of the book has grown, with the updates and new
29. material refl ecting
the expansion of the fi eld itself.
The second edition now has four parts:
• Part I . The Foundation of Systems Engineering,
consisting of Chapters 1 – 5 ,
describes the origins and structure of modern systems, the
current fi eld of systems
engineering, the structured development process of complex
systems, and the
organization of system development projects.
• Part II . Concept Development, consisting of Chapters
6 – 9 , describes the early
stages of the system life cycle in which a need for a new system
is demonstrated,
fpref01.indd xxifpref01.indd xxi 2/8/2011 3:49:23
PM2/8/2011 3:49:23 PM
xxii PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
its requirements identifi ed, alternative implementations
developed, and key
program and technical decisions made.
• Part III . Engineering Development, consisting of
Chapters 10 – 13 , describes the
later stages of the system life cycle, in which the system
building blocks are
engineered (to include both software and hardware subsystems)
and the total
system is integrated and evaluated in an operational
30. environment.
• Part IV . Postdevelopment, consisting of Chapters 14
and 15 , describes the roles
of systems in the production, operation, and support phases of
the system life
cycle and what domain knowledge of these phases a systems
engineer should
acquire.
Each chapter contains a summary, homework problems, and
bibliography.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors of the second edition gratefully acknowledge the
family of Dr. Kossiakoff
and Mr. William Sweet for their encouragement and support of
a second edition to the
original book. As with the fi rst edition, the authors gratefully
acknowledge the many
contributions made by the present and past faculties of the
Johns Hopkins University
Systems Engineering graduate program. Their sharp insight and
recommendations on
improvements to the fi rst edition have been invaluable in
framing this publication.
Particular thanks are due to E. A. Smyth for his insightful
review of the manuscript.
Finally, we are exceedingly grateful to our families — Judy
Seymour and Michele
and August Biemer — for their encouragement, patience, and
unfailing support, even
when they were continually asked to sacrifi ce, and the end
never seemed to be
31. within reach.
Much of the work in preparing this book was supported as part
of the educational
mission of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory.
Samuel J. Seymour
Steven M. Biemer
2010
fpref01.indd xxiifpref01.indd xxii 2/8/2011 3:49:23
PM2/8/2011 3:49:23 PM
xxiii
Learning how to be a successful systems engineer is entirely
different from learning
how to excel at a traditional engineering discipline. It requires
developing the ability
to think in a special way, to acquire the “ systems engineering
viewpoint, ” and to make
the central objective the system as a whole and the success of
its mission. The systems
engineer faces three directions: the system user ’ s needs and
concerns, the project man-
ager ’ s fi nancial and schedule constraints, and the capabilities
and ambitions of the
engineering specialists who have to develop and build the
elements of the system. This
requires learning enough of the language and basic principles of
each of the three
32. constituencies to understand their requirements and to negotiate
balanced solutions
acceptable to all. The role of interdisciplinary leadership is the
key contribution and
principal challenge of systems engineering and it is absolutely
indispensable to the
successful development of modern complex systems.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
Systems Engineering Principles and Practice is a textbook
designed to help students
learn to think like systems engineers. Students seeking to learn
systems engineering
after mastering a traditional engineering discipline often fi nd
the subject highly abstract
and ambiguous. To help make systems engineering more
tangible and easier to grasp,
the book provides several models: (1) a hierarchical model of
complex systems, showing
them to be composed of a set of commonly occurring building
blocks or components;
(2) a system life cycle model derived from existing models but
more explicitly related
to evolving engineering activities and participants; (3) a model
of the steps in the
systems engineering method and their iterative application to
each phase of the life
cycle; (4) a concept of “ materialization ” that represents the
stepwise evolution of an
abstract concept to an engineered, integrated, and validated
system; and (5) repeated
references to the specifi c responsibilities of systems engineers
as they evolve during
the system life cycle and to the scope of what a systems
engineer must know to perform
33. these effectively. The book ’ s signifi cantly different approach
is intended to complement
the several excellent existing textbooks that concentrate on the
quantitative and analyti-
cal aspects of systems engineering.
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
fpref02.indd xxiiifpref02.indd xxiii 2/8/2011 3:49:24
PM2/8/2011 3:49:24 PM
xxiv PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
Particular attention is devoted to systems engineers as
professionals, their respon-
sibilities as part of a major system development project, and the
knowledge, skills, and
mind - set they must acquire to be successful. The book stresses
that they must be inno-
vative and resourceful, as well as systematic and disciplined. It
describes the special
functions and responsibilities of systems engineers in
comparison with those of system
analysts, design specialists, test engineers, project managers,
and other members of the
system development team. While the book describes the
necessary processes that
systems engineers must know and execute, it stresses the
leadership, problem - solving,
and innovative skills necessary for success.
The function of systems engineering as defi ned here is to “
guide the engineering
of complex systems. ” To learn how to be a good guide requires
34. years of practice and
the help and advice of a more experienced guide who knows “
the way. ” The purpose
of this book is to provide a signifi cant measure of such help
and advice through the
organized collective experience of the authors and other
contributors.
This book is intended for graduate engineers or scientists who
aspire to or are
already engaged in careers in systems engineering, project
management, or engineering
management. Its main audience is expected to be engineers
educated in a single disci-
pline, either hardware or software, who wish to broaden their
knowledge so as to deal
with systems problems. It is written with a minimum of
mathematics and specialized
jargon so that it should also be useful to managers of technical
projects or organizations,
as well as to senior undergraduates.
1.2 ORIGIN AND CONTENTS
The main portion of the book has been used for the past 5 years
to support the fi ve core
courses of the Johns Hopkins University Master of Science in
Systems Engineering
program and is thoroughly class tested. It has also been used
successfully as a text for
distance course offerings. In addition, the book is well suited to
support short courses
and in - house training.
The book consists of 14 chapters grouped into fi ve parts :
35. • Part I . The Foundations of Systems Engineering,
consisting of Chapters 1 – 4 ,
describes the origin and structure of modern systems, the
stepwise development
process of complex systems, and the organization of system
development
projects.
• Part II . Concept Development, consisting of Chapters
5 – 7 , describes the fi rst
stage of the system life cycle in which a need for a new system
is demonstrated,
its requirements are developed, and a specifi c preferred
implementation concept
is selected.
• Part III . Engineering Development, consisting of
Chapters 8 – 10 , describes the
second stage of the system life cycle, in which the system
building blocks are
engineered and the total system is integrated and evaluated in
an operational
environment.
fpref02.indd xxivfpref02.indd xxiv 2/8/2011 3:49:24
PM2/8/2011 3:49:24 PM
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION xxv
• Part IV . Postdevelopment, consisting of Chapters 11
and 12 , describes the role
of systems engineering in the production, operation, and support
phases of the
system life cycle, and what domain knowledge of these phases
36. in the system life
cycle a systems engineer should acquire.
• Part V . Special Topics consists of Chapters 13 and
14 . Chapter 13 describes the
pervasive role of software throughout system development, and
Chapter 14
addresses the application of modeling, simulation, and trade -
off analysis as
systems engineering decision tools.
Each chapter also contains a summary, homework problems,
and a bibliography.
A glossary of important terms is also included. The chapter
summaries are formatted
to facilitate their use in lecture viewgraphs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the many contributions
made by the present and
past faculties of the Johns Hopkins University Systems
Engineering Masters program.
Particular thanks are due to S. M. Biemer, J. B. Chism, R. S.
Grossman, D. C. Mitchell,
J. W. Schneider, R. M. Schulmeyer, T. P. Sleight, G. D. Smith,
R. J. Thompson, and S.
P. Yanek, for their astute criticism of passages that may have
been dear to our hearts
but are in need of repairs.
An even larger debt is owed to Ben E. Amster, who was one of
the originators and
the initial faculty of the Johns Hopkins University Systems
Engineering program.
Though not directly involved in the original writing, he
37. enhanced the text and diagrams
by adding many of his own insights and fi ne - tuned the entire
text for meaning and
clarity, applying his 30 years ’ experience as a systems
engineer to great advantage.
We especially want to thank H. J. Gravagna for her outstanding
expertise and
inexhaustible patience in typing and editing the innumerable
rewrites of the drafts of
the manuscript. These were issued to successive classes of
systems engineering students
as the book evolved over the past 3 years. It was she who kept
the focus on the fi nal
product and provided invaluable assistance with the production
of this work.
Finally, we are eternally grateful to our wives, Arabelle and
Kathleen, for their
encouragement, patience, and unfailing support, especially
when the written words
came hard and the end seemed beyond our reach.
Much of the work in preparing this book was supported as part
of the educational
mission of the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.
Alexander Kossiakoff
William N. Sweet
2002
fpref02.indd xxvfpref02.indd xxv 2/8/2011 3:49:24
PM2/8/2011 3:49:24 PM
38. fpref02.indd xxvifpref02.indd xxvi 2/8/2011 3:49:24
PM2/8/2011 3:49:24 PM
1
Part I provides a multidimensional framework that
interrelates the basic principles of
systems engineering, and helps to organize the areas of
knowledge that are required to
master this subject. The dimensions of this framework include
1. a hierarchical model of the structure of complex systems;
2. a set of commonly occurring functional and physical
system building blocks;
3. a systems engineering life cycle, integrating the features
of the U.S Department
of Defense, ISO/IEC, IEEE, and NSPE models;
4. four basic steps of the systems engineering method that
are iterated during each
phase of the life cycle;
5. three capabilities differentiating project management,
design specialization, and
systems engineering;
6. three different technical orientations of a scientist, a
mathematician, and an
engineer and how they combine in the orientation of a systems
engineer; and
40. Chapter 3 develops the hierarchical model of a complex
system and the key build-
ing blocks from which it is constituted. This framework is used
to defi ne the breadth
and depth of the knowledge domain of systems engineers in
terms of the system
hierarchy.
Chapter 4 derives the concept of the systems engineering life
cycle, which sets the
framework for the evolution of a complex system from a
perceived need to operation
and disposal. This framework is systematically applied
throughout Parts II – IV of the
book, each part addressing the key responsibilities of systems
engineering in the cor-
responding phase of the life cycle.
Finally, Chapter 5 describes the key parts that systems
engineering plays in the
management of system development projects. It defi nes the
basic organization and
the planning documents of a system development project, with a
major emphasis on
the management of program risks.
p01.indd 2p01.indd 2 2/9/2011 4:16:37 PM2/9/2011
4:16:37 PM
3
1.1 WHAT IS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING?
41. There are many ways in which to defi ne systems engineering.
For the purposes of this
book, we will use the following defi nition:
The function of systems engineering is to guide the
engineering of complex systems .
The words in this defi nition are used in their conventional
meanings, as described
further below.
To guide is defi ned as “ to lead, manage, or direct, usually
based on the superior
experience in pursuing a given course ” and “ to show the way.
” This characterization
emphasizes the process of selecting the path for others to follow
from among many
possible courses — a primary function of systems engineering.
A dictionary defi nition
of engineering is “ the application of scientifi c principles to
practical ends; as the design,
construction and operation of effi cient and economical
structures, equipment, and
systems. ” In this defi nition, the terms “ effi cient ” and “
economical ” are particular con-
tributions of good systems engineering.
The word “ system, ” as is the case with most common
English words, has a
very broad meaning. A frequently used defi nition of a system is
“ a set of interrelated
1
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
43. requiring systems
engineering for their development are listed in a subsequent
section.
The above defi nitions of “ systems engineering ” and “
system ” are not represented
as being unique or superior to those used in other textbooks,
each of which defi nes
them somewhat differently. In order to avoid any potential
misunderstanding, the
meaning of these terms as used in this book is defi ned at the
very outset, before going
on to the more important subjects of the responsibilities,
problems, activities, and tools
of systems engineering.
Systems Engineering and Traditional Engineering Disciplines
From the above defi nition, it can be seen that systems
engineering differs from mechani-
cal, electrical, and other engineering disciplines in several
important ways:
1. Systems engineering is focused on the system as a whole;
it emphasizes its total
operation. It looks at the system from the outside, that is, at its
interactions with
other systems and the environment, as well as from the inside. It
is concerned
not only with the engineering design of the system but also with
external factors,
which can signifi cantly constrain the design. These include the
identifi cation of
customer needs, the system operational environment, interfacing
systems, logis-
tics support requirements, the capabilities of operating
44. personnel, and such other
factors as must be correctly refl ected in system requirements
documents and
accommodated in the system design.
2. While the primary purpose of systems engineering is to
guide, this does not
mean that systems engineers do not themselves play a key role
in system design.
On the contrary, they are responsible for leading the formative
(concept devel-
opment) stage of a new system development, which culminates
in the functional
design of the system refl ecting the needs of the user. Important
design decisions
at this stage cannot be based entirely on quantitative
knowledge, as they are for
the traditional engineering disciplines, but rather must often
rely on qualitative
judgments balancing a variety of incommensurate quantities and
utilizing expe-
rience in a variety of disciplines, especially when dealing with
new
technology.
3. Systems engineering bridges the traditional engineering
disciplines. The diver-
sity of the elements in a complex system requires different
engineering disci-
c01.indd 4c01.indd 4 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
ORIGINS OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 5
45. plines to be involved in their design and development. For the
system to perform
correctly, each system element must function properly in
combination with one
or more other system elements. Implementation of these
interrelated functions
is dependent on a complex set of physical and functional
interactions between
separately designed elements. Thus, the various elements cannot
be engineered
independently of one another and then simply assembled to
produce a working
system. Rather, systems engineers must guide and coordinate
the design of each
individual element as necessary to assure that the interactions
and interfaces
between system elements are compatible and mutually
supporting. Such coor-
dination is especially important when individual system
elements are designed,
tested, and supplied by different organizations.
Systems Engineering and Project Management
The engineering of a new complex system usually begins with
an exploratory stage in
which a new system concept is evolved to meet a recognized
need or to exploit a tech-
nological opportunity. When the decision is made to engineer
the new concept into an
operational system, the resulting effort is inherently a major
enterprise, which typically
requires many people, with diverse skills, to devote years of
effort to bring the system
from concept to operational use.
46. The magnitude and complexity of the effort to engineer a new
system requires
a dedicated team to lead and coordinate its execution. Such an
enterprise is called
a “ project ” and is directed by a project manager aided by a
staff. Systems engineering
is an inherent part of project management — the part that is
concerned with guiding
the engineering effort itself — setting its objectives, guiding its
execution, evaluating
its results, and prescribing necessary corrective actions to keep
it on course. The man-
agement of the planning and control aspects of the project fi
scal, contractual, and
customer relations is supported by systems engineering but is
usually not considered
to be part of the systems engineering function. This subject is
described in more detail
in Chapter 5 .
Recognition of the importance of systems engineering by every
participant in a
system development project is essential for its effective
implementation. To accomplish
this, it is often useful to formally assign the leader of the
systems engineering team to
a recognized position of technical responsibility and authority
within the project.
1.2 ORIGINS OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
No particular date can be associated with the origins of systems
engineering. Systems
engineering principles have been practiced at some level since
the building of the pyra-
47. mids and probably before. (The Bible records that Noah ’ s Ark
was built to a system
specifi cation.)
The recognition of systems engineering as a distinct activity is
often associated
with the effects of World War II, and especially the 1950s and
1960s when a number
of textbooks were published that fi rst identifi ed systems
engineering as a distinct
c01.indd 5c01.indd 5 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
6 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF MODERN
SYSTEMS
discipline and defi ned its place in the engineering of systems.
More generally, the
recognition of systems engineering as a unique activity evolved
as a necessary corollary
to the rapid growth of technology, and its application to major
military and commercial
operations during the second half of the twentieth century.
The global confl agration of World War II provided a
tremendous spur to the
advancement of technology in order to gain a military advantage
for one side or the
other. The development of high - performance aircraft, military
radar, the proximity fuse,
the German VI and V2 missiles, and especially the atomic bomb
required revolutionary
advances in the application of energy, materials, and
48. information. These systems were
complex, combining multiple technical disciplines, and their
development posed engi-
neering challenges signifi cantly beyond those that had been
presented by their more
conventional predecessors. Moreover, the compressed
development time schedules
imposed by wartime imperatives necessitated a level of
organization and effi ciency that
required new approaches in program planning, technical
coordination, and engineering
management. Systems engineering, as we know it today,
developed to meet these
challenges.
During the Cold War of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, military
requirements con-
tinued to drive the growth of technology in jet propulsion,
control systems, and materi-
als. However, another development, that of solid - state
electronics, has had perhaps a
more profound effect on technological growth. This, to a large
extent, made possible
the still evolving “ information age, ” in which computing,
networks, and communica-
tions are extending the power and reach of systems far beyond
their previous limits.
Particularly signifi cant in this connection is the development of
the digital computer
and the associated software technology driving it, which
increasingly is leading to the
replacement of human control of systems by automation.
Computer control is qualita-
tively increasing the complexity of systems and is a particularly
important concern of
systems engineering.
49. The relation of modern systems engineering to its origins can
be best understood
in terms of three basic factors:
1. Advancing Technology, which provide opportunities
for increasing system
capabilities, but introduces development risks that require
systems engineering
management; nowhere is this more evident than in the world of
automation.
Technology advances in human – system interfaces, robotics,
and software make
this particular area one of the fastest growing technologies
affecting system
design.
2. Competition, whose various forms require seeking
superior (and more
advanced) system solutions through the use of system - level
trade - offs among
alternative approaches.
3. Specialization, which requires the partitioning of the
system into building
blocks corresponding to specifi c product types that can be
designed and built
by specialists, and strict management of their interfaces and
interactions.
These factors are discussed in the following paragraphs.
c01.indd 6c01.indd 6 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
50. ORIGINS OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 7
Advancing Technology: Risks
The explosive growth of technology in the latter half of the
twentieth century and
into this century has been the single largest factor in the
emergence of systems engi-
neering as an essential ingredient in the engineering of complex
systems. Advancing
technology has not only greatly extended the capabilities of
earlier systems, such as
aircraft, telecommunications, and power plants, but has also
created entirely new
systems such as those based on jet propulsion, satellite
communications and navigation,
and a host of computer - based systems for manufacturing, fi
nance, transportation,
entertainment, health care, and other products and services.
Advances in technology
have not only affected the nature of products but have also
fundamentally changed
the way they are engineered, produced, and operated. These are
particularly important
in early phases of system development, as described in
Conceptual Exploration, in
Chapter 7 .
Modern technology has had a profound effect on the very
approach to engineering.
Traditionally, engineering applies known principles to practical
ends. Innovation,
however, produces new materials, devices, and processes,
whose characteristics are not
yet fully measured or understood. The application of these to
51. the engineering of new
systems thus increases the risk of encountering unexpected
properties and effects that
might impact system performance and might require costly
changes and program
delays.
However, failure to apply the latest technology to system
development also carries
risks. These are the risks of producing an inferior system, one
that could become pre-
maturely obsolete. If a competitor succeeds in overcoming such
problems as may be
encountered in using advanced technology, the competing
approach is likely to be
superior. The successful entrepreneurial organization will thus
assume carefully selected
technological risks and surmount them by skillful design,
systems engineering, and
program management.
The systems engineering approach to the early application of
new technology is
embodied in the practice of “ risk management. ” Risk
management is a process of
dealing with calculated risks through a process of analysis,
development, test, and
engineering oversight. It is described more fully in Chapters 5
and 9 .
Dealing with risks is one of the essential tasks of systems
engineering, requiring
a broad knowledge of the total system and its critical elements.
In particular, systems
engineering is central to the decision of how to achieve the best
balance of risks, that
52. is, which system elements should best take advantage of new
technology and which
should be based on proven components, and how the risks
incurred should be reduced
by development and testing.
The development of the digital computer and software
technology noted earlier
deserves special mention. This development has led to an
enormous increase in the
automation of a wide array of control functions for use in
factories, offi ces, hospitals,
and throughout society. Automation, most of it being concerned
with information pro-
cessing hardware and software, and its sister technology,
autonomy, which adds in
capability of command and control, is the fastest growing and
most powerful single
infl uence on the engineering of modern systems.
c01.indd 7c01.indd 7 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
8 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF MODERN
SYSTEMS
The increase in automation has had an enormous impact on
people who operate
systems, decreasing their number but often requiring higher
skills and therefore special
training. Human – machine interfaces and other people – system
interactions are particu-
lar concerns of systems engineering.
53. Software continues to be a growing engineering medium whose
power and versatil-
ity has resulted in its use in preference to hardware for the
implementation of a growing
fraction of system functions. Thus, the performance of modern
systems increasingly
depends on the proper design and maintenance of software
components. As a result,
more and more of the systems engineering effort has had to be
directed to the control
of software design and its application.
Competition: Trade - offs
Competitive pressures on the system development process
occur at several different
levels. In the case of defense systems, a primary drive comes
from the increasing mili-
tary capabilities of potential adversaries, which correspondingly
decrease the effective-
ness of systems designed to defeat them. Such pressures
eventually force a development
program to redress the military balance with a new and more
capable system or a major
upgrade of an existing one.
Another source of competition comes with the use of
competitive contracting for
the development of new system capabilities. Throughout the
competitive period, which
may last through the initial engineering of a new system, each
contractor seeks to devise
the most cost - effective program to provide a superior product.
In developing a commercial product, there are nearly always
other companies that
54. compete in the same market. In this case, the objective is to
develop a new market or
to obtain an increased market share by producing a superior
product ahead of the com-
petition, with an edge that will maintain a lead for a number of
years. The above
approaches nearly always apply the most recent technology in
an effort to gain a com-
petitive advantage.
Securing the large sums of money needed to fund the
development of a new
complex system also involves competition on quite a different
level. In particular, both
government agencies and industrial companies have many more
calls on their resources
than they can accommodate and hence must carefully weigh the
relative payoff of
proposed programs. This is a primary reason for requiring a
phased approach in new
system development efforts, through the requirement for justifi
cation and formal
approval to proceed with the increasingly expensive later
phases. The results of each
phase of a major development must convince decision makers
that the end objectives
are highly likely to be attained within the projected cost and
schedule.
On a still different basis, the competition among the essential
characteristics of
the system is always a major consideration in its development.
For example, there is
always competition between performance, cost, and schedule,
and it is impossible to
optimize all three at once. Many programs have failed by
55. striving to achieve levels
of performance that proved unaffordable. Similarly, the various
performance parame-
ters of a vehicle, such as speed and range, are not independent
of one another; the
effi ciency of most vehicles, and hence their operating range,
decreases at higher speeds.
c01.indd 8c01.indd 8 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
ORIGINS OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 9
Thus, it is necessary to examine alternatives in which these
characteristics are allowed
to vary and to select the combination that best balances their
values for the benefi t of
the user.
All of the forms of competition exert pressure on the system
development process
to produce the best performing, most affordable system, in the
least possible time. The
process of selecting the most desirable approach requires the
examination of numerous
potential alternatives and the exercise of a breadth of technical
knowledge and judgment
that only experienced systems engineers possess. This is often
referred to as “ trade - off
analysis ” and forms one of the basic practices of systems
engineering.
Specialization: Interfaces
56. A complex system that performs a number of different
functions must of necessity be
confi gured in such a way that each major function is embodied
in a separate component
capable of being specifi ed, developed, built, and tested as an
individual entity. Such a
subdivision takes advantage of the expertise of organizations
specializing in particular
types of products, and hence is capable of engineering and
producing components of
the highest quality at the lowest cost. Chapter 3 describes the
kind of functional and
physical building blocks that make up most modern systems.
The immensity and diversity of engineering knowledge, which
is still growing, has
made it necessary to divide the education and practice of
engineering into a number of
specialties, such as mechanical, electrical, aeronautical, and so
on. To acquire the neces-
sary depth of knowledge in any one of these fi elds, further
specialization is needed,
into such subfi elds as robotics, digital design, and fl uid
dynamics. Thus, engineering
specialization is a predominant condition in the fi eld of
engineering and manufacturing
and must be recognized as a basic condition in the system
development process.
Each engineering specialty has developed a set of specialized
tools and facilities
to aid in the design and manufacture of its associated products.
Large and small com-
panies have organized around one or several engineering groups
to develop and manu-
facture devices to meet the needs of the commercial market or
57. of the system - oriented
industry. The development of interchangeable parts and
automated assembly has been
one of the triumphs of the U.S. industry.
The convenience of subdividing complex systems into
individual building blocks
has a price: that of integrating these disparate parts into an effi
cient, smoothly operating
system. Integration means that each building block fi ts
perfectly with its neighbors and
with the external environment with which it comes into contact.
The “ fi t ” must be not
only physical but also functional; that is, its design will both
affect the design charac-
teristics and behavior of other elements, and will be affected by
them, to produce the
exact response that the overall system is required to make to
inputs from its environ-
ment. The physical fi t is accomplished at intercomponent
boundaries called interfaces .
The functional relationships are called interactions .
The task of analyzing, specifying, and validating the
component interfaces with
each other and with the external environment is beyond the
expertise of the individual
design specialists and is the province of the systems engineer.
Chapter 3 discusses
further the importance and nature of this responsibility.
c01.indd 9c01.indd 9 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
58. 10 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
A direct consequence of the subdivision of systems into their
building blocks is
the concept of modularity. Modularity is a measure of the
degree of mutual indepen-
dence of the individual system components. An essential goal of
systems engineering
is to achieve a high degree of modularity to make interfaces and
interactions as simple
as possible for effi cient manufacture, system integration, test,
operational maintenance,
reliability, and ease of in - service upgrading. The process of
subdividing a system into
modular building blocks is called “ functional allocation ” and
is another basic tool of
systems engineering.
1.3 EXAMPLES OF SYSTEMS REQUIRING SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING
As noted at the beginning of this chapter, the generic defi
nition of a system as a set of
interrelated components working together as an integrated
whole to achieve some
common objective would fi t most familiar home appliances. A
washing machine con-
sists of a main clothes tub, an electric motor, an agitator, a
pump, a timer, an inner
spinning tub, and various valves, sensors, and controls. It
performs a sequence of timed
operations and auxiliary functions based on a schedule and
operation mode set by the
operator. A refrigerator, microwave oven, dishwasher, vacuum
cleaner, and radio all
59. perform a number of useful operations in a systematic manner.
However, these appli-
ances involve only one or two engineering disciplines, and their
design is based on
well - established technology. Thus, they fail the criterion of
being complex , and we
would not consider the development of a new washer or
refrigerator to involve much
systems engineering as we understand the term, although it
would certainly require a
high order of reliability and cost engineering. Of course, home
appliances increasingly
include clever automatic devices that use newly available
microchips, but these are
usually self - contained add - ons and are not necessary to the
main function of the
appliance.
Since the development of new modern systems is strongly
driven by technological
change, we shall add one more characteristic to a system
requiring systems engineering,
namely, that some of its key elements use advanced technology.
The characteristics of
a system whose development, test, and application require the
practice of systems
engineering are that the system
• is an engineered product and hence satisfi es a specifi ed
need,
• consists of diverse components that have intricate
relationships with one another
and hence is multidisciplinary and relatively complex, and
• uses advanced technology in ways that are central to the
60. performance of its
primary functions and hence involves development risk and
often a relatively
high cost.
Henceforth, references in this text to an engineered or
complex system (or in the
proper context, just system ) will mean the type that has the
three attributes noted above,
that is, is an engineered product, contains diverse components,
and uses advanced
technology. These attributes are, of course, in addition to the
generic defi nition stated
c01.indd 10c01.indd 10 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
EXAMPLES OF SYSTEMS REQUIRING SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING 11
earlier and serve to identify the systems of concern to the
systems engineer as those
that require system design, development, integration, test, and
evaluation. In Chapter
2 , we explore the full spectrum of systems complexity and why
the systems engineering
landscape presents a challenge for systems engineers.
Examples of Complex Engineered Systems
To illustrate the types of systems that fi t within the above defi
nition, Tables 1.1 and 1.2
list 10 modern systems and their principal inputs, processes, and
outputs.
61. TA B L E 1.1. Examples of Engineered Complex Systems:
Signal and Data Systems
System Inputs Process Outputs
Weather satellite Images • Data storage
• Transmission
Encoded images
Terminal air traffi c
control system
Aircraft beacon
responses
• Identifi cation
• Tracking
• Identity
• Air tracks
• Communications
Track location system Cargo routing
requests
• Map tracing
• Communication
• Routing information
• Delivered cargo
Airline reservation
system
62. Travel requests Data management • Reservations
• Tickets
Clinical information
system
• Patient ID
• Test records
• Diagnosis
Information
management
• Patient status
• History
• Treatment
TA B L E 1.2. Examples of Engineered Complex Systems:
Material and Energy Systems
System Inputs Process Outputs
Passenger aircraft • Passengers
• Fuel
• Combustion
• Thrust
• Lift
Transported
passengers
Modern harvester
combine
• Grain fi eld
63. • Fuel
• Cutting
• Threshing
Harvested grain
Oil refi nery • Crude oil
• Catalysts
• Energy
• Cracking
• Separation
• Blending
• Gasoline
• Oil products
• Chemicals
Auto assembly plant • Auto parts
• Energy
• Manipulation
• Joining
• Finishing
Assembled auto
Electric power plant • Fuel
• Air
• Power generation
• Regulation
• Electric AC power
• Waste products
64. c01.indd 11c01.indd 11 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
12 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
It has been noted that a system consists of a multiplicity of
elements, some of
which may well themselves be complex and deserve to be
considered a system in their
own right. For example, a telephone - switching substation can
well be considered as a
system, with the telephone network considered as a “ system of
systems. ” Such issues
will be discussed more fully in Chapters 2 and 4 , to the
extent necessary for the under-
standing of systems engineering.
Example: A Modern Automobile. A more simple and
familiar system, which
still meets the criteria for an engineered system, is a fully
equipped passenger automo-
bile. It can be considered as a lower limit to more complex
vehicular systems. It is
made up of a large number of diverse components requiring the
combination of several
different disciplines. To operate properly, the components must
work together accu-
rately and effi ciently. Whereas the operating principles of
automobiles are well estab-
lished, modern autos must be designed to operate effi ciently
while at the same time
maintaining very close control of engine emissions, which
65. requires sophisticated
sensors and computer - controlled mechanisms for injecting fuel
and air. Antilock brakes
are another example of a fi nely tuned automatic automobile
subsystem. Advanced
materials and computer technology are used to an increasing
degree in passenger pro-
tection, cruise control, automated navigation and autonomous
driving and parking. The
stringent requirements on cost, reliability, performance,
comfort, safety, and a dozen
other parameters present a number of substantive systems
engineering problems.
Accordingly, an automobile meets the defi nition established
earlier for a system requir-
ing the application of systems engineering, and hence can serve
as a useful example.
An automobile is also an example of a large class of systems
that require active
interaction (control) by a human operator. To some degree, all
systems require such
interaction, but in this case, continuous control is required. In a
very real sense, the
operator (driver) functions as an integral part of the overall
automobile system, serving
as the steering feedback element that detects and corrects
deviations of the car ’ s path
on the road. The design must therefore address as a critical
constraint the inherent
sensing and reaction capabilities of the operator, in addition to
a range of associated
human – machine interfaces such as the design and placement of
controls and displays,
seat position, and so on. Also, while the passengers may not
function as integral ele-
66. ments of the auto steering system, their associated interfaces
(e.g., weight, seating and
viewing comfort, and safety) must be carefully addressed as
part of the design process.
Nevertheless, since automobiles are developed and delivered
without the human
element, for purposes of systems engineering, they may be
addressed as systems in
their own right.
1.4 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AS A PROFESSION
With the increasing prevalence of complex systems in modern
society, and the essential
role of systems engineering in the development of systems,
systems engineering as a
profession has become widely recognized. Its primary
recognition has come in compa-
nies specializing in the development of large systems. A number
of these have estab-
c01.indd 12c01.indd 12 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AS A PROFESSION 13
lished departments of systems engineering and have classifi ed
those engaging in the
process as systems engineers. In addition, global challenges in
health care, communica-
tions, environment, and many other complex areas require
engineering systems methods
to develop viable solutions.
67. To date, the slowness of recognition of systems engineering as
a career is the fact
that it does not correspond to the traditional academic
engineering disciplines.
Engineering disciplines are built on quantitative relationships,
obeying established
physical laws, and measured properties of materials, energy, or
information. Systems
engineering, on the other hand, deals mainly with problems for
which there is incom-
plete knowledge, whose variables do not obey known equations,
and where a balance
must be made among confl icting objectives involving
incommensurate attributes. The
absence of a quantitative knowledge base previously inhibited
the establishment of
systems engineering as a unique discipline.
Despite those obstacles, the recognized need for systems
engineering in industry
and government has spurred the establishment of a number of
academic programs
offering master ’ s degrees and doctoral degrees in systems
engineering. An increasing
number of universities are offering undergraduate degrees in
systems engineering as
well.
The recognition of systems engineering as a profession has led
to the formation of
a professional society, the International Council on Systems
Engineering (INCOSE),
one of whose primary objectives is the promotion of systems
engineering, and the
recognition of systems engineering as a professional career.
68. Career Choices
Systems engineers are highly sought after because their skills
complement those in
other fi elds and often serve as the “ glue ” to bring new ideas
to fruition. However, career
choices and the related educational needs for those choices is
complex, especially when
the role and responsibilities of a systems engineer is poorly
understood.
Four potential career directions are shown in Figure 1.1 : fi
nancial, management,
technical, and systems engineering. There are varying degrees
of overlap between them
despite the symmetry shown in the fi gure. The systems
engineer focuses on the whole
system product, leading and working with many diverse
technical team members, fol-
lowing the systems engineering development cycle, conducting
studies of alternatives,
and managing the system interfaces. The systems engineer
generally matures in the
fi eld after a technical undergraduate degree with work
experience and a master of
science degree in systems engineering, with an increasing
responsibility of successively
larger projects, eventually serving as the chief or lead systems
engineer for a major
systems, or systems - of - systems development. Note the
overlap and need to understand
the content and roles of the technical specialists and to
coordinate with the program
manager (PM).
The project manager or PM, often with a technical or business
69. background, is
responsible for interfacing with the customer and for defi ning
the work, developing
the plans, monitoring and controlling the project progress, and
delivering the fi nished
output to the customer. The PM often learns from on the job
training (OJT) with
c01.indd 13c01.indd 13 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
14 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
projects of increasing size and importance, enhancing the
toolset available with a master
of science degree in technical/program management. While not
exclusively true,
the chief executive offi cer (CEO) frequently originates from
the ranks of the organiza-
tion ’ s PMs.
The fi nancial or business career path that ultimately could lead
to a chief
fi nancial offi cer (CFO) position usually includes business
undergraduate and master of
business administration (MBA) degrees. Individuals progress
through their careers with
various horizontal and vertical moves, often with specialization
in the fi eld. There is
an overlap in skill and knowledge with the PM in areas of
contract and fi nance
management.
70. Many early careers start with a technical undergraduate degree
in engineering,
science or information technology. The technical specialist
makes contributions as part
of a team in the area of their primary knowledge, honing skills
and experience to
develop and test individual components or algorithms that are
part of a larger system.
Contributions are made project to project over time, and
recognition is gained from
innovative, timely, and quality workmanship. Technical
specialists need to continue to
learn about their fi eld and to stay current in order to be
employable compared to the
next generation of college graduates. Often advanced degrees
(MS and PhDs) are
acquired to enhance knowledge, capability, and recognition, and
job responsibilities
can lead to positions such as lead engineer, lead scientist, or
chief technology offi cer
(CTO) in an organization. The broader minded or experienced
specialist often considers
a career in systems engineering.
Figure 1.1. Career opportunities and growth.
CFO
CFO
MBA
BSOne must keep fresh in the Developing fiscal skills and tools
CTO
BS MS OJT
71. Financial
technical field to avoid obsolescence through horizontal and
lateral transitions
Program
manager
Systems
Technical
management
Technical
specialty
Interfacing with the customer
PhD MS BS Focus on
BS
MS
engineering
and managing WBS, budgets
and schedules
Increasing technical specialty whole systems
product
OJT Increasing
technical and
72. program
responsibility
Chief or lead systems engineer
Leading multidisciplinary teams
and developing diverse products
Copyright 2008 S.J. Seymour
c01.indd 14c01.indd 14 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AS A PROFESSION 15
Orientation of Technical Professionals
The special relationship of systems engineers with respect to
technical disciplines can
be better understood when it is realized that technical people
not only engage in widely
different professional specialties, but their intellectual
objectives, interests, and atti-
tudes, which represent their technical orientations, can also be
widely divergent. The
typical scientist is dedicated to understanding the nature and
behavior of the physical
world. The scientist asks the questions “ Why? ” and “ How?
” The mathematician is
usually primarily concerned with deriving the logical
consequences of a set of assump-
tions, which may be quite unrelated to the real world. The
mathematician develops the
proposition “ If A, then B. ” Usually, the engineer is mainly
73. concerned with creating a
useful product. The engineer exclaims “ Voila! ”
These orientations are quite different from one another, which
accounts for why
technical specialists are focused on their own aspects of science
and technology.
However, in most professionals, those orientations are not
absolute; in many cases, the
scientist may need some engineering to construct an apparatus,
and the engineer may
need some mathematics to solve a control problem. So, in the
general case, the orienta-
tion of a technical professional might be modeled by a sum of
three orthogonal vectors,
each representing the extent of the individual ’ s orientation
being in science, mathemat-
ics, or engineering.
To represent the above model, it is convenient to use a diagram
designed to show
the composition of a mixture of three components. Figure 1.2 a
is such a diagram in
which the components are science, mathematics, and
engineering. A point at each vertex
represents a mixture with 100% of the corresponding
component. The composition of
the mixture marked by the small triangle in the fi gure is
obtained by fi nding the per-
centage of each component by projecting a line parallel to the
baseline opposite each
vertex to the scale radiating from the vertex. This process gives
intercepts of 70%
science, 20% mathematics, and 10% engineering for the
orientation marked by the
triangle.
74. Because the curricula of technical disciplines tend to be
concentrated in specialized
subjects, most students graduate with limited general
knowledge. In Figure 1.2 b, the
circles representing the orientation of individual graduates are
seen to be concentrated
in the corners, refl ecting their high degree of specialization.
The tendency of professional people to polarize into diverse
specialties and inter-
ests tends to be accentuated after graduation, as they seek to
become recognized in their
respective fi elds. Most technical people resist becoming
generalists for fear they will
lose or fail to achieve positions of professional leadership and
the accompanying rec-
ognition. This specialization of professionals inhibits technical
communication between
them; the language barrier is bad enough, but the differences in
basic objectives and
methods of thought are even more serious. The solution of
complex interdisciplinary
problems has had to depend on the relatively rare individuals
who, for one reason or
another, after establishing themselves in their principal
profession, have become inter-
ested and involved in solving system problems and have learned
to work jointly with
specialists in various other fi elds.
c01.indd 15c01.indd 15 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
75. 16 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
Figure 1.2. (a) Technical orientation phase diagram. (b)
Technical orientation population
density distribution.
(a)
(b)
c01.indd 16c01.indd 16 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AS A PROFESSION 17
The occasional evolution of technical specialists into systems
engineers is symbol-
ized in Figure 1.2 b by the arrows directed from the vertices
toward the center. The
small black triangle corresponds to such an evolved individual
whose orientation is
30% science, 50% engineering, and 20% mathematics, a balance
that would be effective
in the type of problem solving with which a systems engineer is
typically involved. It
is the few individuals who evolve into systems engineers or
system architects who
become the technical leaders of system development programs.
The Challenge of Systems Engineering
An inhibiting factor in becoming a professional systems
engineer is that it represents
76. a deviation from a chosen established discipline to a more
diverse, complicated profes-
sional practice. It requires the investment of time and effort to
gain experience and an
extensive broadening of the engineering base, as well as
learning communication and
management skills, a much different orientation from the
individual ’ s original profes-
sional choice.
For the above reasons, an engineer considering a career in
systems engineering
may come to the conclusion that the road is diffi cult. It is clear
that a great deal must
be learned; that the educational experience in a traditional
engineering discipline is
necessary; and that there are few tools and few quantitative
relationships to help make
decisions. Instead, the issues are ambiguous and abstract,
defying defi nitive solutions.
There may appear to be little opportunity for individual
accomplishment and even less
for individual recognition. For a systems engineer, success is
measured by the accom-
plishment of the development team, not necessarily the system
team leader.
What Then Is the Attraction of Systems Engineering?
The answer may lie in the challenges of systems engineering
rather than its direct
rewards. Systems engineers deal with the most important issues
in the system develop-
ment process. They design the overall system architecture and
the technical approach
and lead others in designing the components. They prioritize the
77. system requirements
in conjunction with the customer to ensure that the different
system attributes are
appropriately weighted when balancing the various technical
efforts. They decide which
risks are worth undertaking and which are not, and how the
former should be hedged
to ensure program success.
It is the systems engineers who map out the course of the
development program
that prescribes the type and timing of tests and simulations to
be performed along the
way. They are the ultimate authorities on how the system
performance and system
affordability goals may be achieved at the same time.
When unanticipated problems arise in the development
program, as they always
do, it is the systems engineers who decide how they may be
solved. They determine
whether an entirely new approach to the problem is necessary,
whether more intense
effort will accomplish the purpose, whether an entirely different
part of the system can
c01.indd 17c01.indd 17 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
18 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
be modifi ed to compensate for the problem, or whether the
requirement at issue can
78. best be scaled back to relieve the problem.
Systems engineers derive their ability to guide the system
development not from
their position in the organization but from their superior
knowledge of the system as a
whole, its operational objectives, how all its parts work
together, and all the technical
factors that go into its development, as well as from their
proven experience in steering
complex programs through a maze of diffi culties to a
successful conclusion.
Attributes and Motivations of Systems Engineers
In order to identify candidates for systems engineering careers,
it is useful to examine
the characteristics that may be useful to distinguish people with
a talent for systems
engineering from those who are not likely to be interested or
successful in that disci-
pline. Those likely to become talented systems engineers would
be expected to have
done well in mathematics and science in college.
A systems engineer will be required to work in a
multidisciplinary environment
and to grasp the essentials of related disciplines. It is here that
an aptitude for science
and engineering helps a great deal because it makes it much
easier and less threatening
for individuals to learn the essentials of new disciplines. It is
not so much that they
require in depth knowledge of higher mathematics, but rather,
those who have a limited
mathematical background tend to lack confi dence in their
79. ability to grasp subjects that
inherently contain mathematical concepts.
A systems engineer should have a creative bent and must like
to solve practical
problems. An interest in the job should be greater than an
interest in career advance-
ment. Systems engineering is more of a challenge than a quick
way to the top.
The following characteristics are commonly found in successful
systems engineers.
They
1. enjoy learning new things and solving problems,
2. like challenges,
3. are skeptical of unproven assertions,
4. are open - minded to new ideas,
5. have a solid background in science and engineering,
6. have demonstrated technical achievement in a specialty
area,
7. are knowledgeable in several engineering areas,
8. pick up new ideas and information quickly, and
9. have good interpersonal and communication skills.
1.5 SYSTEMS ENGINEER CAREER DEVELOPMENT
MODEL
80. When one has the characteristics noted above and is attracted
to become a systems
engineer, there are four more elements that need to be present in
the work environment.
As shown in Figure 1.3 a, one should seek assignments to
problems and tasks that are
c01.indd 18c01.indd 18 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
SYSTEMS ENGINEER CAREER DEVELOPMENT MODEL 19
very challenging and are likely to expand technical domain
knowledge and creative
juices. Whatever the work assignment, understanding the
context of the work and
understanding the big picture is also essential. Systems
engineers are expected to
manage many activities at the same time, being able to have
broad perspectives but
able to delve deeply into to many subjects at once. This ability
to multiplex is one that
takes time to develop. Finally, the systems engineer should not
be intimidated by
complex problems since this is the expected work environment.
It is clear these ele-
ments are not part of an educational program and must be
gained through extended
professional work experience. This becomes the foundation for
the systems engineering
career growth model.
Employers seeking to develop systems engineers to
competitively address more
81. challenging problems should provide key staff with relevant
systems engineering
work experience, activities that require mature systems
thinking, and opportunities
for systems engineering education and training. In Figure 1.3 b,
it can be seen that
the experience can be achieved not only with challenging
problems but also with
Figure 1.3. (a) Systems engineering (SE) career elements
derived from quality work experi-
ences. (b) Components of employer development of systems
engineers.
(a)
(b)
c01.indd 19c01.indd 19 2/8/2011 11:04:29 AM2/8/2011
11:04:29 AM
20 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
Figure 1.4. “ T ” model for systems engineer career
development. CE, chemical engineering;
ME, mechanical engineering; EE, electrical engineering; AE,
aeronautical engineering; App
Math, applied mathematics.
Domain Breadth
Systems Program Lead
83. Small Project Lead
Systems
Engineer (9–12 years)
DSci
PhD
Team
Participant (5–8 years)
MS
u
ca
tio
n
Technical
Contributor (1–4 years)O
p
e
ra
tio
n
a
l a
n
d
F
ie
84. ld
T
e
c
h
n
ic
a
l
D
e
p
th
CE ME EE AE
App
Math
…BS
Educational Disciplines
E
d
u
experienced mentors and real, practical exercises. While using
systems thinking to
explore complex problem domains, staff should be encouraged
85. to think creatively and
out of the box. Often, technically trained people rigidly follow
the same processes and
tired ineffective solutions. Using lessons learned from past
programs and case studies
creates opportunities for improvements. Formal training and use
of systems engineering
tools further enhance employee preparation for tackling
complex issues.
Interests, attributes, and training, along with an appropriate
environment, provide
the opportunity for individuals to mature into successful
systems engineers. The com-
bination of these factors is captured in the “ T ” model for
systems engineer career devel-
opment illustrated in Figure 1.4 . In the vertical, from bottom
to top is the time progression
in a professional ’ s career path. After completion of a technical
undergraduate degree,
shown along the bottom of the chart, an individual generally
enters professional life as
a technical contributor to a larger effort. The effort is part of a
project or program that
falls in a particular domain such as aerodynamics, biomedicine,
combat systems, infor-
mation systems, or space exploration. Within a domain, there
are several technical
competencies that are fundamental for systems to operate or to
be developed.
The T is formed by snapshots during a professional ’ s career
that illustrates in the
horizontal part of the T the technical competencies at the time
that were learned and
used to meet the responsibilities assigned at that point in their
86. career. After an initial
c01.indd 20c01.indd 20 2/8/2011 11:04:30 AM2/8/2011
11:04:30 AM
THE POWER OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 21
experience in one or two technical domains as technical
contributor, one progresses to
increasing responsibilities in a team setting and eventually to
leading small technical
groups. After eight or more years, the professional has acquired
both suffi cient technical
depth and technical domain depth to be considered a systems
engineer. Additional
assignments lead to project and program systems engineering
leadership and eventually
to being the senior systems engineer for a major development
program that exercises
the full range of the technical competencies for the domain.
In parallel with broadening and deepening technical experience
and competencies,
the successful career path is augmented by assignments that
involve operational fi eld
experiences, advanced education and training, and a strong
mentoring program. In order
to obtain a good understanding of the environment where the
system under development
will operate and to obtain fi rsthand knowledge of the system
requirements, it is essential
for the early systems engineer professional to visit the “ fi eld
site ” and operational loca-
tion. This approach is important to continue throughout one ’ s
87. career. A wide variety of
systems engineering educational opportunities are available in
both classroom and
online formats. As in most engineering disciplines where the
student is not planning
on an academic career, the master of science is the terminal
degree. Courses are usually
a combination of systems engineering and domain or
concentration centric focused with
a thesis or capstone project for the students to demonstrate their
knowledge and skills
on a practical systems problem. Large commercial companies
also provide training in
systems engineering and systems architecting with examples
and tools that are specifi c
to their organization and products. Finally, the pairing of a
young professional with an
experienced systems engineer will enhance the learning process.
1.6 THE POWER OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
If power is measured by authority over people or money, then
systems engineers would
appear to have little power as members of the system
development team. However, if
power is measured by the infl uence over the design of the
system and its major char-
acteristics, and over the success or failure of the system
development, then systems
engineers can be more powerful than project managers. The
sources of this power come
from their knowledge, skills, and attitude. Each of these is
discussed in the following
paragraphs.
The Power of Multidisciplinary Knowledge
88. A major system development project is a veritable “ Tower of
Babel. ” There are literally
dozens of specialists in different disciplines whose collective
efforts are necessary to
develop and produce a successful new system. Each group of
specialists has its own
language, making up for the imprecision of the English
language with a rich set of
acronyms, which convey a very specifi c meaning but are
unintelligible to those outside
the specialty. The languages, in turn, are backed up by
knowledge bases, which the
specialists use to ply their trade. These knowledge bases contain
descriptions of the
different materials peculiar to each discipline, as well as bodies
of relationships, many
c01.indd 21c01.indd 21 2/8/2011 11:04:30 AM2/8/2011
11:04:30 AM
22 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THE WORLD OF
MODERN SYSTEMS
of them expressed in mathematical terms, that enable the
specialists to compute various
characteristics of their components on the basis of design
assumptions. These knowl-
edge bases are also foreign to those outside the discipline.
Such a collection of multi - tongued participants could never
succeed in collectively
developing a new system by themselves, just as the citizens of
Babylon could never
89. build their tower. It is the systems engineers who provide the
linkages that enable these
disparate groups to function as a team. The systems engineers
accomplish this feat
through the power of multidisciplinary knowledge. This means
that they are suffi ciently
literate in the different disciplines involved in their system that
they can understand the
languages of the specialists, appreciate their problems, and are
able to interpret the
necessary communications for their collective endeavor. Thus,
they are in the same
position as a linguist in the midst of a multinational conference,
with people speaking
in their native tongues. Through the ability to understand
different languages comes
the capability to obtain cooperative effort from people who
would otherwise never be
able to achieve a common objective. This capability enables
systems engineers to
operate as leaders and troubleshooters, solving problems that no
one else is capable of
solving. It truly amounts to a power that gives systems
engineers a central and decisive
role to play in the development of a system.
It is important to note that the depth of interdisciplinary
knowledge, which is
required to interact effectively with specialists in a given fi eld,
is a very small fraction
of the depth necessary to work effectively in that fi eld. The
number of new acronyms
that one has to learn in a given technical area is nearer to a
dozen of the more frequently
used ones than to a hundred. It also turns out that once one gets
past the differences in
90. semantics, there are many common principles in different
disciplines and many similar
relationships. For instance, the equation used in
communications, connecting signal,
noise, antenna gain, receiver sensitivity, and other factors, is
directly analogous to a
similar relationship in acoustics.
These facts mean that a systems engineer does not need to
spend a lifetime becom-
ing expert in associated disciplines, but rather can accumulate a
working knowledge of
related fi elds through selected readings, and more particularly,
discussion with col-
leagues knowledgeable in each fi eld. The important thing is to
know which principles,
relationships, acronyms, and the like are important at the system
level and which are
details. The power of multidisciplinary knowledge is so great
that, to a systems engi-
neer, the effort required to accumulate it is well worth the
learning time.
The Power of Approximate Calculation
The practice of systems engineering requires another talent
besides multidisciplinary
knowledge. The ability to carry out “ back of the envelope ”
calculations to obtain a
“ sanity check ” on the result of a complex calculation or test
is of inestimable value to
the systems engineer. In a few cases, this can be done
intuitively on the basis of past
experience, but more frequently, it is necessary to make a rough
estimate to ensure that
a gross omission or error has not been committed. Most
91. successful systems engineers
have the ability, using fi rst principles, to apply basic
relationships, such as the com-
munications equation or other simple calculation, to derive an
order of magnitude result
c01.indd 22c01.indd 22 2/8/2011 11:04:30 AM2/8/2011
11:04:30 AM
SUMMARY 23
to serve as a check. This is particularly important if the results
of the calculation or
experiment turn out very differently from what had been
originally expected.
When the sanity check does not confi rm the results of a
simulation or experiment,
it is appropriate to go back to make a careful examination of the
assumptions and
conditions on which the latter were based. As a matter of
general experience, more
often than not, such examinations reveal an error in the
conditions or assumptions under
which the simulation or experiment was conducted.
The Power of Skeptical Positive Thinking
The above seemingly contradictory title is meant to capture an
important characteristic
of successful systems engineering. The skeptical part is
important to temper the tradi-
tional optimism of the design specialist regarding the
probability of success of a chosen
92. design approach. It is the driving force for the insistence of
validation of the approach
selected at the earliest possible opportunity.
The other dimension of skepticism, which is directly related to
the characteristic
of positive thinking, refers to the reaction in the face of failure
or apparent failure of a
selected technique or design approach. Many design specialists
who encounter an
unexpected failure are plunged into despair. The systems
engineer, on the other hand,
cannot afford the luxury of hand wringing but must have, fi rst
of all, a healthy skepti-
cism of the conditions under which the unexpected failure
occurred. Often, it is found
that these conditions did not properly test the system. When the
test conditions are
shown to be valid, the systems engineer must set about fi nding
ways to circumvent the
cause of failure. The conventional answer that the failure must
require a new start along
a different path, which in turn will lead to major delays and
increases in program cost,
is simply not acceptable unless heroic efforts to fi nd an
alternative solution do not
succeed. This is where the power of multidisciplinary
knowledge permits the systems
engineer to look for alternative solutions in other parts of the
system, which may take
the stress off the particular component whose design proved to
be faulty.
The characteristic of positive thinking is absolutely necessary
in both the systems
engineer and the project manager so that they are able to