Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Ss10 change management
1. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1
Prof. Olaf Hengerer
Change Management (333415)
Erfasste Fragebögen = 29
Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen
Legende
Fragetext Rechter PolLinker Pol n=Anzahl
mw=Mittelwert
md=Median
s=Std.-Abw.
E.=Enthaltung
25%
1
0%
2
50%
3
0%
4
25%
5
Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Median
Skala Histogramm
Evaluation of the module I
1. The module provides a good overview of the topic
area.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.5
md=1
s=0.6
55.2%
1
41.4%
2
3.4%
3
0%
4
0%
5
2. I am encouraged to think about and reflect on the
material / topic.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.6
md=2
s=0.7
48.3%
1
41.4%
2
10.3%
3
0%
4
0%
5
3. The topics are examined critically, i.e. from various
perspectives.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=28
mw=1.5
md=1
s=0.9
E.=1
67.9%
1
17.9%
2
7.1%
3
7.1%
4
0%
5
4. The lecturer / seminar tutor makes the module
interesting.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.2
md=1
s=0.7
86.2%
1
6.9%
2
3.4%
3
3.4%
4
0%
5
5. I am learning a lot in the module. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.5
md=1
s=0.8
65.5%
1
24.1%
2
6.9%
3
3.4%
4
0%
5
6. I am gaining a lot of useful and important information. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=28
mw=1.5
md=1
s=0.7
64.3%
1
25%
2
10.7%
3
0%
4
0%
5
7. The module has encouraged me to investigate the
topic for myself.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=2.1
md=2
s=0.9
27.6%
1
41.4%
2
24.1%
3
6.9%
4
0%
5
8. The lecturer / seminar tutor is enthusiastic and tries to
communicate this enthusiasm to the students.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.4
md=1
s=0.8
72.4%
1
20.7%
2
0%
3
6.9%
4
0%
5
9. The lecturer / seminar tutor responds fully to students'
questions and suggestions.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=28
mw=1.8
md=2
s=0.8
E.=1
46.4%
1
35.7%
2
14.3%
3
3.6%
4
0%
5
2. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 2
10. The lecturer / seminar tutor treats students in a
friendly manner.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=2.5
md=2
s=1
10.3%
1
51.7%
2
24.1%
3
6.9%
4
6.9%
5
11. The module is clearly structured. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=28
mw=1.6
md=1
s=0.8
53.6%
1
32.1%
2
10.7%
3
3.6%
4
0%
5
12. I understand the most important aims of the module. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.8
md=2
s=0.6
31%
1
58.6%
2
10.3%
3
0%
4
0%
5
13. The lecturer / seminar tutor is able to convey
complicated material in a comprehensible manner.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=28
mw=1.7
md=2
s=0.6
35.7%
1
57.1%
2
7.1%
3
0%
4
0%
5
14. The lecturer / seminar tutor is well prepared. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.2
md=1
s=0.4
75.9%
1
24.1%
2
0%
3
0%
4
0%
5
15. The lecturer / seminar tutor expresses him/herself
clearly and comprehensibly.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.5
md=1
s=0.7
58.6%
1
34.5%
2
3.4%
3
3.4%
4
0%
5
16. The lecturer / seminar tutor regularly sums up the
material.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.4
md=1
s=0.6
69%
1
24.1%
2
6.9%
3
0%
4
0%
5
17. The lecture notes and materials are comprehensive
and of good quality.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=2
md=2
s=1
34.5%
1
34.5%
2
27.6%
3
0%
4
3.4%
5
18. The topics are illustrated by the use of relevant
examples.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=27
mw=1.7
md=2
s=0.8
40.7%
1
48.1%
2
7.4%
3
3.7%
4
0%
5
19. The importance / relevance / usefulness of the topics
is made clear.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.7
md=2
s=0.6
41.4%
1
51.7%
2
6.9%
3
0%
4
0%
5
20. The level of the module is appropriate to my
previous knowledge.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.8
md=2
s=0.7
31%
1
55.2%
2
13.8%
3
0%
4
0%
5
21. The ECTS credits available for the module fairly
reflect the required workload.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=25
mw=1.9
md=2
s=0.9
E.=4
36%
1
44%
2
12%
3
8%
4
0%
5
Evaluation of the module II
1. I find the topic of the module interesting. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=1.6
md=1
s=0.7
58.6%
1
27.6%
2
13.8%
3
0%
4
0%
5
3. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 3
2. The working atmosphere in the class is pleasant. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=2.1
md=2
s=1
24.1%
1
48.3%
2
20.7%
3
3.4%
4
3.4%
5
3. The teaching rooms are well equipped. Strongly disagreeStrongly agree n=29
mw=2.1
md=2
s=1.2
31%
1
44.8%
2
10.3%
3
6.9%
4
6.9%
5
Demands
1. The scope of the topics is: far too largefar too small n=25
mw=3.1
md=3
s=0.4
0%
1
4%
2
80%
3
16%
4
0%
5
2. The pace of the module is: much too fastmuch too slow n=28
mw=3.3
md=3
s=0.5
0%
1
0%
2
75%
3
21.4%
4
3.6%
5
3. The level of difficulty of the topics themselves is: far too difficultfar too easy n=28
mw=3.1
md=3
s=0.4
0%
1
3.6%
2
82.1%
3
14.3%
4
0%
5
4. The demands of the module are: far too highfar too low n=27
mw=3.1
md=3
s=0.6
3.7%
1
0%
2
81.5%
3
11.1%
4
3.7%
5
General Evaluation
1. Would you recommend this module to other students?
n=29Yes 82.8%
No 3.4%
Possibly 13.8%
2. I would give this module the following overall grade: 51 n=28
mw=3
md=2.5
s=1.9
10.7%
1
39.3%
2
28.6%
3
3.6%
4
7.1%
5
7.1%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
9
3.6%
10
0%
11
3. For comparison: I would give the following grade to
my favourite module over the past two years:
51 n=28
mw=1.9
md=2
s=0.8
32.1%
1
50%
2
14.3%
3
3.6%
4
0%
5
0%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
9
0%
10
0%
11
4. I spend xx hours per week working for this module
(excluding class contact time):
> 60 n=28
mw=3.2
md=3
s=1.2
7.1%
1
25%
2
28.6%
3
25%
4
10.7%
5
3.6%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
9
5. I spend xx hours per week working for all my other
modules together (excluding class contact time):
>405 n=28
mw=5.4
md=5.5
s=2.2
10.7%
1
3.6%
2
0%
3
14.3%
4
21.4%
5
21.4%
6
10.7%
7
10.7%
8
7.1%
9
6. Amount of independent work required for this module
(as a % of total independent work required for all
modules):
50-1000-10 n=26
mw=2
md=1
s=1.3
53.8%
1
19.2%
2
11.5%
3
11.5%
4
0%
5
3.8%
6
4. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 4
Your Details
What university entrance qualification (HZB) do you have?
n=28Abitur 57.1%
Fachgeb. Abitur 7.1%
Fachhochschulreife 32.1%
Other qualification 3.6%
Which semester are you in?
n=291 0%
2 0%
3 3.4%
4 10.3%
5 31%
6 55.2%
7 0%
8 0%
> 8 0%
How many examinations did you fail last semester? > 40 n=29
mw=1.2
md=1
s=0.5
86.2%
1
10.3%
2
3.4%
3
0%
4
0%
5
0%
6
5. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5
Profillinie
Teilbereich: Fakultät W2
Name der/des Lehrenden: Prof. Olaf Hengerer
Titel der Lehrveranstaltung:
(Name der Umfrage)
Change Management
1. The module provides a good overview of the topic area. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.5
2. I am encouraged to think about and reflect on the material / topic. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.6
3. The topics are examined critically, i.e. from various perspectives. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=28
mw=1.5
4. The lecturer / seminar tutor makes the module interesting. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.2
5. I am learning a lot in the module. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.5
6. I am gaining a lot of useful and important information. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=28
mw=1.5
7. The module has encouraged me to investigate the topic for myself. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=2.1
8. The lecturer / seminar tutor is enthusiastic and tries to communicate this
enthusiasm to the students.
Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.4
9. The lecturer / seminar tutor responds fully to students' questions and
suggestions.
Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=28
mw=1.8
10. The lecturer / seminar tutor treats students in a friendly manner. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=2.5
11. The module is clearly structured. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=28
mw=1.6
12. I understand the most important aims of the module. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.8
13. The lecturer / seminar tutor is able to convey complicated material in a
comprehensible manner.
Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=28
mw=1.7
14. The lecturer / seminar tutor is well prepared. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.2
15. The lecturer / seminar tutor expresses him/herself clearly and comprehensibly. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.5
16. The lecturer / seminar tutor regularly sums up the material. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.4
17. The lecture notes and materials are comprehensive and of good quality. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=2
18. The topics are illustrated by the use of relevant examples. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=27
mw=1.7
19. The importance / relevance / usefulness of the topics is made clear. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.7
20. The level of the module is appropriate to my previous knowledge. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.8
21. The ECTS credits available for the module fairly reflect the required workload. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=25
mw=1.9
1. I find the topic of the module interesting. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=1.6
2. The working atmosphere in the class is pleasant. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=2.1
3. The teaching rooms are well equipped. Strongly agree Strongly disagree
n=29
mw=2.1
1. The scope of the topics is: far too small far too large
n=25
mw=3.1
2. The pace of the module is: much too slow much too fast
n=28
mw=3.3
6. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6
3. The level of difficulty of the topics themselves is: far too easy far too difficult
n=28
mw=3.1
4. The demands of the module are: far too low far too high
n=27
mw=3.1
2. I would give this module the following overall grade: 1 5
n=28
mw=3
3. For comparison: I would give the following grade to my favourite module over the
past two years:
1 5
n=28
mw=1.9
4. I spend xx hours per week working for this module (excluding class contact time): 0 > 6
n=28
mw=3.2
5. I spend xx hours per week working for all my other modules together (excluding
class contact time):
5 >40
n=28
mw=5.4
6. Amount of independent work required for this module (as a % of total
independent work required for all modules):
0-10 50-100
n=26
mw=2
How many examinations did you fail last semester? 0 > 4
n=29
mw=1.2
7. Prof. Olaf Hengerer, Change Management
27.07.2010 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7
Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen
General Evaluation
Comments / Suggestions for Improvement:
