Opening Up The BL's Metadata

4,416 views

Published on

Presentation given at GLAM Wiki Event
The British Museum
Lonodon
November 2010

Published in: Education, Technology
1 Comment
10 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,416
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
57
Comments
1
Likes
10
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Organisational Restrictions
    Free Offering
    Ownership/Licensing agreements
    Legislation (e.g. Data Protection Act)
    Technical issues (e.g. data is non-standard format)
    Policy on sharing with for profit organisations etc
    Scope
    Permissions
    Data Format
    Coverage/Inclusion Policy
    Delivery routes (e.g. Web, FTP etc)
    Level of user support (if any)
    To use for any purpose forever
    To study & adapt for local use
    To redistribute copies
    To improve & release to the community
  • Opening Up The BL's Metadata

    1. 1. Opening Up The British Library’s Metadata Neil Wilson Head of Metadata Services
    2. 2. 2 The British Library?  Receives a copy of every publication produced in the UK and Ireland  The collection includes well over 150 million items, in most languages with 3 million new items added each year We hold 14 million books, 920,000 journal and newspaper titles, 58 million patents, 3 million sound recordings Operates the world's largest document delivery service providing millions of items a year to customers all over the world
    3. 3. 3 The British Library - St Pancras Houses the British Library’s reference collections, exhibition galleries and conference centre
    4. 4. 4 The British Library – Boston Spa Designed for document delivery services & housing a collection devoted to interlibrary loan
    5. 5. 5 British Library Metadata Services Origins  Operated prior to the BL’s foundation as ‘The British National Bibliography’ (BNB) since 1950  Originally a service to the national and international library communities  Has evolved through many changes in technology: Print, CD-ROM, Online, Data file etc
    6. 6. 6 The Value of Bibliographic Metadata  Libraries source bibliographic metadata to reduce cataloguing, increase usage & efficiently acquire & manage stock  Publishers promote details of new works & availability of existing inventory to generate sales  Library users value the availability of ‘shortcut’ summary descriptions enabling efficient identification & selection of relevant material  Standardised free descriptive metadata is increasingly important to consumers acting as a product ‘label’ identifying key properties & summarising content
    7. 7. 7 The Evolving Information Landscape  Traditional library metadata derives from static & self contained library catalogue cards  The ‘Semantic Web’ uses a more dynamic model using linking to establish relationships between data elements & enabling users to navigate from one resource to related data within others Traditional Metadata Semantic Metadata Passive Self contained Linear text ‘Read’ by users as result of database query End result Domain specific format Dynamic/Reactive Linked to external resources Micro Portal Interacts with users & external systems in response to queries Offers options for further inquiry Open Structure
    8. 8. 8 Public Sector Data - Changing Expectations  The advent of the Web accelerated the development of a collaboration culture & fostered an expectation that information, metadata & content should be as freely available as the Internet itself  Many wider benefit arguments have been advanced for public bodies to make their data freely available  2009 saw an increasing Government commitment to the principle of opening up public data for wider re-use. The Putting the Frontline First: smarter government report requires “the majority of government-published information to be reusable, linked data by June 2011” Benefit for state Benefit for public body •Stimulation of knowledge economy will generate tax revenue, business opportunities & jobs via innovation •Public sector information is an underexploited resource & governments should maximise state benefits from their initial investment •Encourages diversity of resources – no single supplier can create all services or content •Taxpayers have already paid once for data creation, why pay again? •Minimal development required since the data is already created •Possible data cleanup for re-harvesting by organisation •User generated or added linked content may enhance internal data •Offers free R&D & Management Information opportunities •New opportunities for collaboration to assist internal efficiencies •Increased reputation/relevance seen as inclusive community partner •Opportunities to offer new value added services on back of free offering
    9. 9. 9 Libraries - Changing Perceptions  “Librarians are book jailers locking knowledge away from users”  “I did my PhD with only 12 visits to the library. That was 5 years ago; things have improved since then, now you don’t need to use it at all!”  “The library world is far too insular; using formats that nobody outside understands, libraries must be more open and stop perpetuating unnecessary barriers”  “90% of users no longer use library catalogues. Instead they just use Google as a starting point for their research.”
    10. 10. 10 New Uses of Library Metadata Library metadata has been given new value as formats & technologies for sharing it have arisen to assist re-use e.g.:  Research usage for efficient citation management (e.g. Pro- Cite)  Management of personal collections via bibliographic sharing services (e.g. LibraryThing, Open Library)  Mashups of data elements from multiple sources  Mining of entire databases e.g. to identify publication trends  Ebooks e.g. publishers re-use metadata to describe & promote works republished in electronic form
    11. 11. 11 The British Library’s 2020 Vision 2020 Themes relevant to the metadata strategy:  Lead and collaborate in growing the world’s knowledge base  Enable access to everyone who wants to do research  Support research communities in key areas for social and economic benefit
    12. 12. 12 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy Developing an open metadata strategy presented us with some issues we needed to manage e.g. :  Financial and legal - loss of revenue from traditional bibliographic services, increasingly complex copyright and licensing frameworks  Reputational – perception that the BL is not keeping up with technology or meeting government & community expectations due to differing interpretations of ‘free’ & ‘open’ Free Open Of cost? Of all licensing restrictions? To sell or re-use in commercial services To copy & redistribute? To access from anywhere To modification/enhancement To use with free software To linking from your data or system
    13. 13. 13 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy Free/Open Licensing Models  Currently many licensing models exist for putting material into the public domain & offering originators both credit & protection against liability  Because of this a range of collaborative licensing options has been developed by organisations such as Creative Commons & Open Knowledge Foundation  Few organisations give unconditional access to their metadata & parameterise their free offerings Organisational Restrictions Free Offering Scope Permissions Ownership/Licensing agreements Legislation (e.g. Data Protection Act) Technical issues (e.g. data is non-standard format) Policy on sharing with for profit organisations etc Data Format Coverage/Inclusion Policy Delivery routes (e.g. Web, FTP etc) Level of user support (if any) To use for any purpose forever To study & adapt for local use To redistribute copies To improve & release to the community
    14. 14. 14 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy Choices In opening our data we had the following objectives:  To try and break out of library specific formats (e.g. MARC) and use more cross domain XML based structures (DC, RDF etc)  To develop the formats with the communities using them  To adopt a multi track approach including traditional libraries, researchers and linked data  To try and get some form of attribution but to also use the form of licensing most appropriate to the wider use of our metadata  To come up with an affordable way of delivering the above
    15. 15. 15 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy First Steps During 2010 we:  Developed our capability to support non-library metadata standards used by the wider web community  Run free metadata trials with a range of partners including: LibraryThing community cataloguers, DCMS non-library developers, the UK Intellectual Property Office and UNESCO  Developed a free Z39.50 record download service for the library community to assist with derived cataloguing etc  Hosted a workshop on linked data with over 40 representatives from key international organisations involved in developing linked datasets and infrastructure
    16. 16. 16 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy Current Status Since our announcement in August we have:  Signed up over 200 organisations worldwide to our free MARC21 Z39.50 service  Begun working with other linked data implementers on technical challenges, standards and licensing issues  Created a new email enquiry point for BL metadata issues: metadata@bl.uk  Begun to offer our RDF/XML metadata under a CC0 license  Begun to supply 3 million record RDF/XML datasets to organisations including the Open Bibliography Project, the Open Library and Wikimedia
    17. 17. 17 Creating an Open Metadata Strategy Next Steps During the next 6 months we intend to:  Create a prototype version of our catalogue with embedded URIs to linked data resources including DBpedia for experimental use in linked data initiatives  Extend coverage of our RDF/XML data to non-book materials (e.g. maps , printed music etc)  Co-operate with JISC to encourage wider experimentation with new BL RDF/XML bibliographic metadata  Examine collaborative options for creating and presenting linked data resources (e.g. with German National Library).  Find out more about how people are beginning to use our data
    18. 18. 18 The British Library metadata@bl.uk

    ×