Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Interaction of phosphonates onto the        immobilized surface:Application to scale control in oil and gas flow assurance...
Outline•   Background and previous batch study•   Hypothesis/Objectives•   Challenges and Methods•   Results•   Conclusions
Scale in water transporting system Scale in oil and gas flow assurance (CaCO3,  FeCO3 ,CaSO4, BaSO4, SrSO4 , etc.)   Cha...
How much scale could potentially form ?Scale tendency                        0, " undersatur ated" and calcite dissolves  ...
Scale control with threshold inhibitor Conventional onshore and Unconventional offshore reservoir    Pushing and fixing ...
Inhibitor return after squeeze treatment         1000                                                                     ...
Phosphonates attachment to calcite surface(Previous Batch Study) Solid Phase NTMP Conc. ( mol/m2 )                        ...
Solubility of Ca-Inhibitor precipitates(Previous Batch Study) Inhibitor   Stoichiometry    Solubility product             ...
Hypothesis Inhibitor may deposit and retain on the surface by working with  the possible scale, such as CaCO3 Scaling ri...
Challenges   No robust experimental method for kinetics study   Difficult to convert beaker result to real prediction  ...
Modified Plug flow reactorModified carbon steel tube (AISI1010, 5in length, ¼ in OD)   1. Coat the outer surface with rust...
Modified Plug flow reactor3. Precoat uniform CaCO3 layer on the subsurface  Provide constant surface area                 ...
Apparatus                          pump                                           Sample Collection &                     ...
Inhibitor attachmentC0= 680ppm, ΔSI_CaCO3= 0.6, 0.2-1330 mg/L DTPMP, pH= 5.9, 70C, Q=100ml/h for 1 hr                     ...
.                Inhibitor conc. effect on the attachment                 Inhibitor attachment on the calcite surface (sur...
Ca conc. effect on the attachmentCca= 612-3833 mg/L, 100 mg/L DTPMP, pH= 6.2, 70C, Q=100ml/h            1.2             1 ...
Ca conc. effect on the attachment                                       SI_CaCO3               0.8     1.0         1.2    ...
CaCO3 facilitates phosphonate retention                                                                          SI_      ...
Inhibitor release      Cca= 680 mg/L, ΔSI= 0.6, No DTPMP, pH= 5.9, 70C, Q=100ml/h             DTPMP conc. (mg/L)   100    ...
“Memory effect” of inhibitor release           100                                                     800                ...
Ca Concentration effect                   2.5                                                                             ...
Flow rate effect on the inhibitor release               100                                                     10 ml/hr  ...
1.4                           DTPMP S.S. Effluent Conc. (mg/L)                                                            ...
Pipe length at equilibrium (c=cs)Q=1000 bbl/d,       c/cs(DTPMP) I.D.=2.5-4 inch,      1.2v=22.7-57.9 cm/sec,      1km=2.8...
Inhibitor-Saturation Index RelationshipAt a specific T, SI, pH, and molar ratio (cation/anion) for                        ...
2.5                                                                2.25                                                   ...
Conclusion The phosphonate inhibitor layer was built up on the pipe  surface with CaCO3 pre-coated layer. Amount of inhi...
Acknowledgements       • Rice Brine Chemistry Consortium (BCC)       • Fellowship, China Scholarship Council       [Grant ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Sigma xi nanzhang_20130312_3

586 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Sigma xi nanzhang_20130312_3

  1. 1. Interaction of phosphonates onto the immobilized surface:Application to scale control in oil and gas flow assurance Nan Zhang Rice University nanzhang@rice.edu March, 2013
  2. 2. Outline• Background and previous batch study• Hypothesis/Objectives• Challenges and Methods• Results• Conclusions
  3. 3. Scale in water transporting system Scale in oil and gas flow assurance (CaCO3, FeCO3 ,CaSO4, BaSO4, SrSO4 , etc.)  Changes of temperature and pressure.  Variations of pH and CO2/H2S partial pressure during operation.  Mixing of incompatible waters.  Effect of other constitnents. Fouling in heat exchanger (CaCO3, CaSO4, etc.) Fouling on the membrane surface (CaSO4, BaSO4 ,etc.)
  4. 4. How much scale could potentially form ?Scale tendency 0, " undersatur ated" and calcite dissolves SI zero, " equilibriu m" and scale doesn t form 0, " supersatur ated" and calcite precipitates
  5. 5. Scale control with threshold inhibitor Conventional onshore and Unconventional offshore reservoir  Pushing and fixing inhibitors into the formation via squeeze treatment  Inject trace inhibitors downhole via a treat string Unconventional onshore reservoir  Inject trace inhibitors with the fracturing fluid DTPMP NTMP (methylene phosphonic acid) (Methylene phosphonic acid)
  6. 6. Inhibitor return after squeeze treatment 1000 1000 Phosphonate (mg/L) 100Phosphonate (mg/L) 100 Gladys McCall N. R. Smith 10 10 1 1 0 0 3.E+01 1.E+07 2.E+07 3.E+01 5.E+05 1.E+06 2.E+06 Volumes of Produced Water (bbl) Volumes of Produced Water (bbl) Minimum Downhole Ca Well Name TDS (mg/L) ΔSI Inhibitor Temperature (F) (mg/L) Needed Gladys 298 96340 4130 1.04 0.18 McCall N.R. Smith 160 50899 480 0.43 <0.7 Inhibitor return concentration is dropping to a few mg/L level in the early flowback stage, but the interaction mechanism between the phosphonate inhibitor and scale is unclear, so the return concentration of the inhibitor is unpredictable.
  7. 7. Phosphonates attachment to calcite surface(Previous Batch Study) Solid Phase NTMP Conc. ( mol/m2 ) 100000 10000 3, Heterogeneous crystal growth 1000 precipitation 100 10 2, Crystal growth 1 0.1 Tomson et al., SPE, 2003 1, Langmuir adsorption 0.01 0.00001 0.001 0.1 10 1000 Solution Phase NaNa42NTMP Conc. (mmol/L) Solution Phase 4H H2 NTMP Conc. (mmol/L) Adsorption Langmuir adsorption Crystal growth CaCO3 Amorphous growth Kan et al., JCIS, 2005
  8. 8. Solubility of Ca-Inhibitor precipitates(Previous Batch Study) Inhibitor Stoichiometry Solubility product PKsp at 1 M Solubility1 I, 70 ºC (mg/L) NTMP CaH4P 32.46 32.46 22502 Ca2.5HP (am) 32.96 - 6.88 I(M) 2.17 I(M) 2380 / T(  K ) 21.31 174 Ca2.5HP (cr) 32.92 - 5.32 I(M) 1.76 I(M) 2023 / T(  K ) 23.46 0.92 Fe2.5HP (aged) 39.54 - 6.14 I(M ) 2.18 I(M ) 1315 / T(  K ) 31.74 0.0953 DTPMP Ca3H4P (am) 50.5 @ 1 - 2 M I, 70 C 50.5 250 Ca3H4P (cr) 58.95 0.048 I(M) 2084.5 / T(  K) 52.9 1.05 BHPMP Ca4H2P (am) 35.41 385 48.11 - 2.65 I(M) 3448 / T(  K ) Ca4H2P (cr) 48.46 - 2.60 I(M) 2998 / T(  K ) 37.12 7.0 PPCA Ca3(A·A·A)2 16.35 + 0.24·I(M) –252.1/(T( K) - 252.1) 13.82 1.45 (aged) Kan et al. Biogeochemistry of chelating agents chapter 15, 2005 The formation of CaPhn/FePhn precipitates with a low solubility may contribute to the low inhibitor return concentrations
  9. 9. Hypothesis Inhibitor may deposit and retain on the surface by working with the possible scale, such as CaCO3 Scaling risk can be controlled with a pulse injection of inhibitorObjectives1. Develop a CaCO3 pre-coated steel tubing for studies of CaCO3 crystal growth kinetics and inhibition kinetics.2. Evaluate the attachment kinetics of inhibitor on the surface3. Investigate the detachment kinetics and equilibrium of inhibitor from the surface and its inhibition impact on the CaCO3 scaling to the pipe.
  10. 10. Challenges  No robust experimental method for kinetics study  Difficult to convert beaker result to real prediction  Limited information on inhibitor performance Modified Conventional Rotating Constant Plug flow Plug flow Method free drift disc composition reactor reactor (this study) Surface area Variable Constant Variable Variable ConstantSaturation index Variable Variable Constant Constant Constant Ionic strength Variable Variable Constant Constant Constant pH Variable Variable Constant Constant Constant Hydraulic No Yes No Yes Yes condition Ultra High Hard Hard Hard Easy EasyTemp/Pressure
  11. 11. Modified Plug flow reactorModified carbon steel tube (AISI1010, 5in length, ¼ in OD) 1. Coat the outer surface with rust-oleum for corrosion control 2. Polish inner surface with sandpaper to create a smooth surface for CaCO3 deposition
  12. 12. Modified Plug flow reactor3. Precoat uniform CaCO3 layer on the subsurface Provide constant surface area Tubing surface area Eliminate initial preferential attachment A=18.3 cm2 Crystal surface area A=55 cm2 1.02 1.00 Ca Conc. Calcite 0.98 0.96C/C0 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.84 Aragonite 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (hr)
  13. 13. Apparatus pump Sample Collection & Analysis: ICP, ICP-MS Soln. A Reactor: CaCl2+ NaCl Carbon steel AISI1010 tubing pre-100% CO2 coated with CaCO3 75 psi Soln. B pump NaHCO3+ NaCl Water Bath Parameter Value ICP_MS STD P Flow rate 10 -250 ml/min 0.6 Reactor I.D. 1/8 inch 0.5 Intensity Reactor Length 5 inch 0.4 y = 0.001x 0.3 R² = 0.999 Temperature 70 °C 0.2 Reactor volume 2.09 cm3 0.1 Residence time 75sec- 12.6 min 0 Reynolds’s 0 200 400 600 9-100 P conc. (ug/L) number
  14. 14. Inhibitor attachmentC0= 680ppm, ΔSI_CaCO3= 0.6, 0.2-1330 mg/L DTPMP, pH= 5.9, 70C, Q=100ml/h for 1 hr 1.2 DTPMP Effluent C/C0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Time (min) 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0.2 mg/L 2.5 mg/L 5 mg/L 50 mg/L 100 mg/L 363 mg/L 1331 mg/L K tracer • The break through occurs in 20 min • Inhibitor cannot accumulate on the surface with time
  15. 15. . Inhibitor conc. effect on the attachment Inhibitor attachment on the calcite surface (surface area 55cm2) DTPMP f=129.4087*(1-exp(-0.0145*x)) DTPMP (retaine 140 (injected) d) 120 q 100 mg/L mg/m2 q (mg/m2) 80 0.22 0.20 60 2.5 2.01 40 5 7.05 10 18.73 20 47 56.89 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 102 107.39 DTPMP (mg/L) 363.6 127.10 1331.8 128.78
  16. 16. Ca conc. effect on the attachmentCca= 612-3833 mg/L, 100 mg/L DTPMP, pH= 6.2, 70C, Q=100ml/h 1.2 1 C/C0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Time (min) 0 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Ca=612 mg/L Ca=1704 mg/L Ca=3833 mg/L • The break through didn’t occur • Inhibitor can accumulate on the surface with time
  17. 17. Ca conc. effect on the attachment SI_CaCO3 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1100 SI_ DTPMP SI_ 1000 Ca vs q Ca Ca3H4 (retained q SI_CaCO3 vs q DTPM CaCO3 for 1 hour 900 P injection)q (mg/m2) mg/ 800 mg/L mg % m2 700 612 1.76 0.9 3.4 33 618 1704 1.85 1.35 4.6 50 836 600 3833 1.77 1.73 5.3 52 1019 500 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Injected Ca (mg/L) • Both Ca3H4DTPMP and CaCO3 precipitates affect the inhibitor attachment
  18. 18. CaCO3 facilitates phosphonate retention SI_ 1200 SI_ Ca HCO3 Ca3H4 q 1000 DTPM CaCO3 P 800 mg/q (mg/m2) mg/L m2 600 579 1224 2.09 0.01 59.2 583 1770 2.02 0.34 60.64616 400 581 2538 1.86 0.66 71.1 200 612 3274 1.76 0.9 609 0 1704 3274 1.85 1.35 835 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 CaCO3 SI 3833 3274 1.77 1.73 966 • SICaCO3 > 0.9, Ca concentration control the inhibitor attachment • SICaCO3 > 0.6, Phosphonates concentration control the inhibitor attachment
  19. 19. Inhibitor release Cca= 680 mg/L, ΔSI= 0.6, No DTPMP, pH= 5.9, 70C, Q=100ml/h DTPMP conc. (mg/L) 100 q= 4.75 mg/m2 102.5 mg/L DTPMP 2 47.4 27.9 mg/m q= mg/L DTPMP 10 2 10 mg/L mg/m q= 125 DTPMP 2.5 mg/Lmg/m2 q= 267 DTPMP 1 0.25 0.02 mg/L 0.1 0.01 60 80 100 120 140 Time (min)DTPMP return• starts with a short desorption and then followed by a long term dissolution process.• doesn’t change with the amount of inhibitor attachment on the surface conc.
  20. 20. “Memory effect” of inhibitor release 100 800 0.30 800 0.25 80 600 600 DTPMP (mg/L)DTPMP (mg/L) Ca (mg/L) 0.20 Ca (mg/L) 60 400 0.15 400 40 0.10 DTPMP 200 200 20 Ca 0.05 DTPMP Ca 0 0 0.00 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Time (min) Time (min) DTPMP Injection DTPMP Protection q (injected) time (retained) time mg/L hr mg % mg/m2 hr 0.22 1 0.003 1.04 0.41 5.7 47.4 1 0.69 1.45 125 17 SI_CaCO3=0.59
  21. 21. Ca Concentration effect 2.5 4500 4000 2.0 DTPMP (mg/L) 3500 Ca (mg/L) 3000 1.5 2500 SI=0.29 SI=0.74 SI=1.1 SI=-3.3 SI=-0.28 1.0 2000 1500 0.5 1000 500 0.0 0 180 240 300 360 420 480 DTPMP Ca Time (min) Ca HCO3 SI pH mg/L mg/L • Ca precipitation and dissolution were both prevented.612.37 1643.73 0.29 5.891703.86 1643.73 0.74 5.90 • DTPMP failed when SI_CaCO3 > 1.13969.95 1643.73 1.11 5.92 5.88 • DTPMP return increased with a lower SI_CaCO3 . 0.175 1643.73 -3.25163.69 1691.89 -0.28 5.88
  22. 22. Flow rate effect on the inhibitor release 100 10 ml/hr Return LinearDTPMP (mg/L) Q DTPMP 50 ml/hr Velocity 10 Steady state 100 ml/hr 250 ml/hr ml/hr cm/sec mg/L 10 0.017 1.3 1 50 0.08 0.4 100 0.17 0.25 250 0.42 0.12 0 60 110 160 210 260 310 360 Time (min)
  23. 23. 1.4 DTPMP S.S. Effluent Conc. (mg/L) 1.2 1.0Advection Dissolution 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 L/v £s(sec) Return Overall Mass Linear DTPMP Solubility Dissolution transfer Velocity Steady (cs) rate rate state constant (k) constant cm/sec mg/L mg/L sec-1 cm/sec 0.017 1.3 0.08 0.4 2.86 1.73 0.0018 0.17 0.25 E-4 0.42 0.12
  24. 24. Pipe length at equilibrium (c=cs)Q=1000 bbl/d, c/cs(DTPMP) I.D.=2.5-4 inch, 1.2v=22.7-57.9 cm/sec, 1km=2.86 E-4 cm/sec, 0.8c/cs=1-exp(-3)=0.95L=1250-3200 ft 0.6 0.4 ID=4 inch ID=2.5 inch 0.2 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 pipe length (ft)
  25. 25. Inhibitor-Saturation Index RelationshipAt a specific T, SI, pH, and molar ratio (cation/anion) for Bariteeach specific inhibitor concentration, CInh (mg / L)there is a ,unique saturation index value, SI Bartiefor those conditions. ,These were solved for using Goal Seek. Illustrated here forbarite, the same applies for calcite. a2 a3 a4 t0Barite 10 ^ a1 SI Barite TK SI BartieTK Barite b3 [ Ba 2 ]M b Inh b1 b2 SI Bartie b4 pH b5 log10 2 TK [ SO4 ]M Barite Bartie Barite 1 f safety t Inh CInh (mg / L) Barite log10 bInh t0Barite
  26. 26. 2.5 2.25 Barite Calcite and barite Saturation IndexesDTPMP (mg/L), blue diamonds 2 2 1.75 1.5 1.5 Calcite 1 1.25 1 0.5 0.75 0 0.5 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Feet of flow in 2.5in. pipe with Ca-DTPMP on steel surface
  27. 27. Conclusion The phosphonate inhibitor layer was built up on the pipe surface with CaCO3 pre-coated layer. Amount of inhibitor attached is related with the DTPMP adsorption on the CaCO3 surface. CaCO3 can facilitate the inhibitor attachment on the surface, may suggest the copercipitation of CaCO3 and CaPhn crystal. The DTPMP return is controlled by the dissolution of the Ca3H4DTPMP precipitates attached on the surface with a dissolution rate about 0.0018 cm-1. Ca precipitation and dissolution were both prevented.
  28. 28. Acknowledgements • Rice Brine Chemistry Consortium (BCC) • Fellowship, China Scholarship Council [Grant 2008102375] (2008-prsent) • DOE (DE-FE0001910) •Dr. Mason Tomson and Dr. Amy Kan

×