Electrohydrodynamics (EHD) drying is novel, non-thermal drying technique which has significant advantages over conventional drying techniques in terms of energy consumption and food product quality.
2. Drying is a mass transfer process comprising the removal of
water by evaporation.
Applications β
β’ Restrain microbial development
β’ Inhibit quality decay
β’ Aid in processing
β’ Confer desirable texture
β’ Cost reduction
Drying is an energy-intensive process and accounts for about
10-20 % the total energy required in food processing industries.
3. Afterdeals of conventional drying
β’ Loss of quality
β’ Loss of energy
β’ Longer time
β’ Prohibitively expensive at commercial scale
Major Concerns β
β’ Reduction of energy usage in drying in terms of reducing
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
β’ consumer demand for superior quality
4. there is a need for novel and promising alternative drying
processes.
One such promising technique is Electrohydrodynamics
(EHD) drying.
EHD is a method of inducing Electric wind (corona wind) that is
generated by gaseous ions under the influence of a high-voltage
electric field.
Fig. 1. corona discharge
5. Literature Review
Product comparison Inference Reference
Tomato Air and oven
dry
Increased drying rate
No difference in
shrinkage
Ali et al., 2011
Spinach Oven drying Higher Retention of color
and ascorbic acid
Bajgai et al.,
2001
Shrimps Oven air
drying
Better color and
rehydration
Less shrinkage
Bai et al., 2011
Scallop
muscle
Oven and air
drying
72 % energy saving
Better quality retention
Bai et al., 2012
Japanese
radish
Oven and air
drying
Higher moisture removal
Better quality retention
Bajgai et al.,
2001
Sea
cucumber
Oven drying Better quality
78 % energy saving
Bai et al., 2013
Table 1: studies of EHD dryimg on food products
6. Product Comparison Inference Reference
Grape
pomace
Thermal
drying at 80 0
c
Better color retention
Superior energy efficiency
Martynenko et
al., 2015
Rice Batch (45 0c )
drying
Incresed breakage
susceptibility
Ali et al., 2012
Chinese
wolfberr
y
Hot air drying Higher moisture removal
and vitamin c retention
Yang et al.,
2001
carrot Oven , air
EHD (+,-)
Better color
Less shrinkage
Lesser energy
consumption
Alemrajabi et
al., 2011
banana Microwave
drying
Lesser energy
Better quality
Longer time
Ali et al., 2013
apple Ambient air
drying
Increased drying rate Hashinaga et
al., 2013
tofu Ambient air
drying
Increased drying rate Bai et al., 2010
7. Mechanism
β’ Production of electrical wind by corona discharge.
β’ A corona discharge is brought on by the ionization of
a fluid such as air surrounding a conductor that is electrically
charged.
β’ On sharp points in air corona can start at potentials of 2 - 6 kV
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram emitter-collector plate interaction
8. Ions under the effect of strong electric field experiences the
coulomb force and propagates towards opposite charge
electrode
F = E π π
Where E is electric field
And π π is charge density
Along the way they collide
with neutral gas molecule.
β’ Chain effect
β’ Electrical wind
Fig. 3. wind by corona discharge
9. Negative corona have more no. of free Electrons and higher electon
density Compared to positive corona.
Fig. 4. negative and positive discharge
10. β’ Corona wind disturbs the boundary layer developed from
the grounded surface on which the biological material is
placed
β’ Under the electric field molecules orient themselves in the
direction of an electric field.
During this process, a lowering of entropy occurs,
which in turn lowers the temperature of the material
being dried.
β’ Vortex effect due to internal diffusion.
11. Wind velocity ( v )
v = (π π/π π) π/π
E
where π π is the dielectric permittivity of air (8.85 Γ10β12
F/m);
π π is the air density
E is electric field
Assumption -
β’ ionic wind flow is laminar
β’ the turbulence caused due to viscosity of the medium is
negligible
12. Warburg Current density distribution
π = π0 πππ 5 ΞΈ
Where ΞΈ<60 And π0 is current density at ΞΈ=0
Fig. 5. Warburg Current density distribution
14. FOOD VOLTAGE
(KV)
FOOD VOLTAGE
(KV)
potato 5 Banana 6, 8, 10
carrot 5.2 Wheat 10, 12.5, 15
Rough rice 10 Rapeseed 8,9,10
Radish 4.3 Chinese
wolfberry
20, 24, 28, 32
Apple 5 Scallop 5-50
spinach 4.3 Tomato 3,4,5
ELECTRIC FIELD
β’ moisture removal rate and energy consumption is
proportional to applied voltage .
β’ High voltage transformer are connected to corresponding
configuration
Table 2: voltage applied in EHD drying
18. 3. Wire type configuration
β’ Forms slot type jet
β’ More drying rate than needle type
Fig. 12. Wire to mesh configurationFig. 11. Wire to plate configuration
19. Wire type impinging flow
Wire
Wind flow
Food sample
Collector plate
Fig. 13.top view of slot jet
Fig. 14. Front view of slot jet
20. Electrode spacing
1. Larger than optimum - spacing
β’ Less cover up of surface
β’ Lower drying rates
2. Lesser than optimum - spacing
β’ Interference
β’ Lower drying rate
β’ Loss of energy due to inter
collision
21. Optimum inter- spacing
β’ highest drying rates
β’ no interference
β’ Maximum exposing area
Fig. 15. Optimum spacing between neighbouring electrodes
22. effect of spacing between two neighbouring wires on Tofu
β’ 80 % moisture content
β’ 45 kV
Fig. 16. effect of spacing between two neighbouring wires on Tofu
Source : Bai et al., 2010
23. Emitter β Collector gap
β’ If E-C gap is more than optimum then electric field and corona current
and hence velocity of ionic wind will be lesser causing reduced drying
rate.
β’ If E-C gap is lesser than optimum then due to difference in corona
wind will be higher causing reduced drying rates.
Electrode gap in cm
Fig : effect of E-C
gap on tofu
24. Energy consumption and efficiency
β’ 85-99 % of ππ‘ππ‘ is required for high voltage conversion.
β’ power required for corona discharge is given by
π· π¬π―π« = π½ π π° π
β’ Total energy by corona discharge πΈ πΈπ»π· = ππΈπ»π· Ξt.
β’ The energy use of the entire EHD process (ππ‘ππ‘ = ππ‘ππ‘ Ξt)
Where Ξt is operational time.
β’ The specific energy consumption (SEC, kJ/kg) is mostly used to
characterize the efficiency of EHD drying .
25. Convective Cross-Flow
β’ Suppression of ionic wind.
β’ To quantify interaction between convective air flow and ionic
wind, the dimensionless EHD number (π πΈπ»π·) is introduced.
π΅ π¬π―π« =
π π
π
Where π’ π πππ u are ionic wind velocity and cross-flow air velocity,
respectively.
The effect of EHD was significant only at low air velocity (π΅ π¬π―π« >
1).
negligible effect of low air velocity in the range 0 to 0.4 m /s on
EHD efficiency.
26. Product Specific energy consumption
[kJ/kg]
πΈ πΈπ»π· πΈπ‘ππ‘
Grape pomace 611-641 45000
Sea cucumber - 4386
Chinese
Wolfberry
882 3920
Tomato 4400-16500 -
Banana - 350
carrot - 700-2500
mushroom - 48-745
Specific energy consumption of EHD drying
Table 3:Specific energy consumption by EHD drying on food
27. Food Shrinkage
Color
change
Rehydrati
on
Vitamin c
retention
Banana less Insignificant more -
Radish less Insignificant more -
Carrot
Less less - -
Tomato Less Less - -
Spinach - Less - higher
Wolfberry Insignificant - more higher
Table 5: Effect of EHD drying quality parameters of food products
Effect of EHD drying quality parameters of food products
29. REFERENCES
Bajgai, T., Raghavan, G., Hashinaga, F.,Ngadi, M. (2006), Electrohydrodynamic dryingβA
concise overview. Drying Technology, 24(7), 905β910.
Li, F., Li, L., Sun, J., Tatsumi, E. (2006). Effect of electrohydrodynamic (EHD) technique on
drying process and appearance of okara cake. Journal of Food Engineering, 77(2), 275β280.
Chen, Y.,Barthakur, N., Arnold, N. (1994). ( Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying of potato
slabs. Journal of Food Engineering, 23(1), 107β119.
Lai, F., Wong, D. (2003). EHD-enhanced drying with needle electrode. Drying Technology,
21(7), 1291β1306.
Hashinaga, F., Bajgai, T., Isobe, S., Barthakur, N. (1999). Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying
of apple slices. Drying Technology, 17(3),479β495.
Basiry, M., Esehaghbeygi, A. (2010). Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying of rapeseed
(Brassica napus L.). Journal of Electrostatics, 68(4), 360β363.
Goodenough, T., Goodenough, P., Goodenough, S. (2007). The efficiency of corona wind
drying and its application to the food industry. Journal of Food Engineering, 80(4), 1233β
1238.
Li, F., Li, L., Sun, F., Tatsumi, E. (2005). Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying characteristic of
okara cake. Drying Technology, 23(3), 565β580.
30. Esehaghbeygi, A.,Basiry, M. (2011). Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying of tomato slices
(Lycopersicon esculentum). Journal of Food Engineering, 104(4), 628β631.
Cao, W., Nishiyama, Y., Koide, S. (2004). Electrohydrodynamic drying characteristics of
wheat using high voltage electrostatic field. Journal of Food Engineering, 62(3), 209β213.
Yaxiang, B., Hu, Y., Li, X., Li, J. (2009). Experiment study of electrohydrodynamic (EHD)
drying scallop. Power and Energy Engineering Conference, 2803β2806.
Xue, G., Uchino, T., Matsuo, M. (1994). Drying promotion of radish using corona discharge.
Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 56(5), 35β42.
Bajgai, T., Hashinaga, F. (2001). High electric field drying of Japanese radish. Drying
Technology, 19(9), 2291β2302.
Bajgai, T.R.; Hashinaga, F. (2001). Drying of spinach with a high electric field. Drying
Technology, 19(9), 2331β2341.
Bai, X., Sun, B. (2011). Study of electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying technique for shrimps.
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 35(6), 891β897.
Yaxiang, B.; Yucai, H.; Xinjun, L. (2010). The tofuβs characteristics of electrohydrodynamic
drying with wire electrode. Presented at Power and Energy Engineering Conference
(APPEEC), 1β4.