1. May 20 , 2014
Project UpdateProject Update
Implemented ByFinanced By Supported By
May 20 , 2014

2. Project Information – UDDIPAN
• As Per PD Commencement: 15 September 2011
• Actual Commencement : January 2012
• Project Location:
• Area : 04 ( Daudkandi, Kachua, Comilla & Mirpur)
• District: 03(Dhaka,Comilla & Chandpur)
• Upazila & Thana: 05 ( Daudkandi, Kachua –Rural
• Mirpur & Sha Ali of DCC (North)
& Kotwali of CCC
• Union: 16 (8 from Daudkandi & 8 from Kachua)
• Urban Ward: 04 (2 from DCC & 2 from CCC)
• Controlled Area: 06 ( Kachua-2 Daudkandi-2,DCC-1 & CCC-1)
2
• As Per PD Commencement: 15 September 2011
• Actual Commencement : January 2012
• Project Location:
• Area : 04 ( Daudkandi, Kachua, Comilla & Mirpur)
• District: 03(Dhaka,Comilla & Chandpur)
• Upazila & Thana: 05 ( Daudkandi, Kachua –Rural
• Mirpur & Sha Ali of DCC (North)
& Kotwali of CCC
• Union: 16 (8 from Daudkandi & 8 from Kachua)
• Urban Ward: 04 (2 from DCC & 2 from CCC)
• Controlled Area: 06 ( Kachua-2 Daudkandi-2,DCC-1 & CCC-1)

3. Staff Position
01-Project Coordinator = 01
01. Trainer=01
03. Accountant= 01
04. Documentation &
Communication Officer=01
04. Area Coordinator= 04
05. Office Assistant= 01
05. Field Facilitators= 20
Total= 29
Now we have 24 staffs. 5 FFs positions
are blank after vacant the positions.
01-Project Coordinator = 01
01. Trainer=01
03. Accountant= 01
04. Documentation &
Communication Officer=01
04. Area Coordinator= 04
05. Office Assistant= 01
05. Field Facilitators= 20
Total= 29
Now we have 24 staffs. 5 FFs positions
are blank after vacant the positions.

4. Project Location ( Geographical)

5. Stakeholders Coverage
2100
68 30920
0
8400 16000 62 460 40 180 100 200
5
68 30920 8400 16000 75 460 40 180 100 200

6. Major Achievement in Activities-October 2014- April 2014
Timeframe Target
activities
Achievement %
6
Target
activities
October 13 - April 14 771 645 84

7. LGI (Rural)
Total- 430
Supports- VGD, VGF,Widow & Old
age allowance, Cow, Goat, Stipend,
Birth Registration,
LGI (Urban)
Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
LGI (Urban)
Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
NSA
Total- 1053
Supports- Computer training, Micro
Credit, NFPE, Stipend, Birth
Registration
LGI (Urban)
Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
NSA ( Urban)
Total- 35
Supports-Stipend, NFPE, Birth
Registration, micro credit
NSA ( Urban)
Total- 35
Supports-Stipend, NFPE, Birth
Registration, micro credit
7

8. _ Organized a press briefing and ID cards distribution ceremony on 28
January 2014 at Baropara union Parishad premises, Daudkandi of
Comilla district. Chief guest was Mr. Anwarul Islam Sikder, Additional
Secretary and Administrator, DNCC. Ms. Birgit Lundback , Director
CRG and Mr. Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager of SCI were also attended
as special guest. Presided over by Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,
UDDIPAN.
_ Organized a press briefing and ID cards distribution ceremony on 28
January 2014 at Baropara union Parishad premises, Daudkandi of
Comilla district. Chief guest was Mr. Anwarul Islam Sikder, Additional
Secretary and Administrator, DNCC. Ms. Birgit Lundback , Director
CRG and Mr. Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager of SCI were also attended
as special guest. Presided over by Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,
UDDIPAN.
8

9. 9

10. EU Delegation visit
EU Delegation Ms. Julia Jacoby along withMr.
Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN, Ms.
Birgit Lundback , Director, CRG, SCI, Mr.
Shamsul Alom Bokul, Deputy Director, CRG, Mr.
Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager, CRG of Save
the Children visited Mirpur slum areas and
Mirpur model thana on 30 January, 2014.
10
EU Delegation Ms. Julia Jacoby along withMr.
Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN, Ms.
Birgit Lundback , Director, CRG, SCI, Mr.
Shamsul Alom Bokul, Deputy Director, CRG, Mr.
Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager, CRG of Save
the Children visited Mirpur slum areas and
Mirpur model thana on 30 January, 2014.

11. EU Delegation visit EU January
2014 Visit
EU January
2014 Visit
11

12. EU Delegation visit EU January
2014 Visit
EU January
2014 Visit
12

13. Photographs- ID card distribution ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony
ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony
13

14. 14
ID card
Distribution
Ceremony
ID card
Distribution
Ceremony

15. ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony
ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony
15

16. 16
ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony
ID Card
Distribution
Ceremony

17. Received & distributed – 6686 cards ( Daudkandi & Kachua)
Identity Card distributionIdentity Card distribution
17

18. Male :481
Female:540
Total: 1021
Male :481
Female:540
Total: 1021
Male : 268
Female: 302
Total: 570
Male : 268
Female: 302
Total: 570
Comilla CC Mirpur
Daudkandi Kachua
Male : 4808
Female: 5037
Total: 9845
Male : 4808
Female: 5037
Total: 9845
Male ; 4600
Female; 4629
Total: 9229
Male ; 4600
Female; 4629
Total: 9229
18

19. 4808
4600
5037
4629
3000
4000
5000
6000
481
268
540
302
0
1000
2000
3000
Comilla Daudkandi Kachua Mirpur
Male
Female
19

20. 20000
25000
30000
35000
20431
30920
Registration Target and Achievement
40%
%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Achieved Target2
60% Target
Achieved

21. 21

22. • LGIs & members of Law Enforcement Agency are proactive if
facilitate any development endeavor positively and interactively.
• Anybody else like to initiate any development initiative for the sake
of children , only need proper facilitation with them.
• People have keen interest to know information on any development
efforts and act in accordance with it.
• To sustain any development efforts need to keep continuing
monitoring and surveillance is necessary.
• All development initiatives should have government's supports.
22
• LGIs & members of Law Enforcement Agency are proactive if
facilitate any development endeavor positively and interactively.
• Anybody else like to initiate any development initiative for the sake
of children , only need proper facilitation with them.
• People have keen interest to know information on any development
efforts and act in accordance with it.
• To sustain any development efforts need to keep continuing
monitoring and surveillance is necessary.
• All development initiatives should have government's supports.

23. -Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some time
making difficulties
-Collecting proper address of place of origin is making
complications
-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete
-Correct spelling of places
-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.
-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t like
to give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some time
making difficulties
-Collecting proper address of place of origin is making
complications
-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete
-Correct spelling of places
-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.
-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t like
to give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some time
making difficulties
-Collecting proper address of place of origin is making
complications
-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete
-Correct spelling of places
-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.
-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t like
to give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some time
making difficulties
-Collecting proper address of place of origin is making
complications
-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete
-Correct spelling of places
-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.
-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t like
to give time in this regard.
23

24. Sharing on Results of Rapid Assessment on Vulnerable Children at
Risk for Unsafe Migration and Migrant
Sharing on Results of Rapid Assessment on Vulnerable Children at
Risk for Unsafe Migration and Migrant
Implemented ByFinanced By Supported By

25. Methodology
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafe
migration after initiating registration system for keep them under the
intensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many children
should be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children from
this list through random sampling basis.
 A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.
Used a format with regards to this
 Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward
 An informal interview with each children and parents was held for
collecting required data.
Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard core
poor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition
04. most of them have no own land for cultivation
05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs
06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafe
migration after initiating registration system for keep them under the
intensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many children
should be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children from
this list through random sampling basis.
 A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.
Used a format with regards to this
 Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward
 An informal interview with each children and parents was held for
collecting required data.
Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard core
poor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition
04. most of them have no own land for cultivation
05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs
06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafe
migration after initiating registration system for keep them under the
intensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many children
should be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children from
this list through random sampling basis.
 A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.
Used a format with regards to this
 Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward
 An informal interview with each children and parents was held for
collecting required data.
Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard core
poor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition
04. most of them have no own land for cultivation
05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs
06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafe
migration after initiating registration system for keep them under the
intensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many children
should be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children from
this list through random sampling basis.
 A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.
Used a format with regards to this
 Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward
 An informal interview with each children and parents was held for
collecting required data.
Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard core
poor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition
04. most of them have no own land for cultivation
05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs
06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc

26. Compilation Sheet of
Data

27. 300
350
400
450
266
402
Total and category wise respondents
link before reg
Link after reg
Yet to link
Total
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Link before reg
Link after reg
Yet to link
Total
124
12

28. 250
300
350
204
198
322
80
Respondents Information : Gender segregation & No of respondents at
source and destination area
Male
0
50
100
150
200
Male
Female
Rural
Urban
80
Female
Rural
Urban

29. 51%
49%
Gender Segregation by %
80%
20%
Rural Urban respondents segregation
by %
Male
Female
Rural
Urban

30. 31%
3%
Percentage of Linkage scenario
Link before reg
66%
Link before reg
Link after reg
Yet to link

31. Major Services received at Rural & Urban Areas
Rural Area (Before
Registration)
VGD,
VGF,
Widow Allowance,
Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,
Food for
works, sanitation etc
Rural Area (Before
Registration)
VGD,
VGF,
Widow Allowance,
Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,
Food for
works, sanitation etc
Urban Area
(Before)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
Sanitation
Urban Area
(Before)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
Sanitation
Rural Area (After
Registration)
NFPE Enrollment
Stipend
Small Loan (Kachua)
Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)
Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Rural Area (After
Registration)
NFPE Enrollment
Stipend
Small Loan (Kachua)
Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)
Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Urban Area
(After)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
stipend
Sanitation
Urban Area
(After)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
stipend
Sanitation
Rural Area (Before
Registration)
VGD,
VGF,
Widow Allowance,
Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,
Food for
works, sanitation etc
Rural Area (Before
Registration)
VGD,
VGF,
Widow Allowance,
Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,
Food for
works, sanitation etc
Urban Area
(Before)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
Sanitation
Urban Area
(Before)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
Sanitation
Rural Area (After
Registration)
NFPE Enrollment
Stipend
Small Loan (Kachua)
Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)
Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Rural Area (After
Registration)
NFPE Enrollment
Stipend
Small Loan (Kachua)
Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)
Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Urban Area
(After)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
stipend
Sanitation
Urban Area
(After)
Health card
Birth registration
Education
stipend
Sanitation

32. Trend analysis area wise
81
76
128
80
100
120
140
Link Before Reg.
Link After Reg.
Migrated before Reg.
Migrated After reg.
81
29
6 8
28 34
20
0 0 0
1 5
0 00
20
40
60
Daudkandi Kachua Mirpur Comilla

33. 20
6
Migrated before and after registration in numbers
Before Reg.
After Reg.
Total at risk & migrant
children
402

34. 5% 1%
Migration before and after registration %
Before Reg.
94%
After Reg.
Not Migrated

35. Updated current address
21
10
15
20
25
5
-5
0
5
10
Daudkandi Kachua Murmur Comilla

36. Updated current address
Scenario of Migrated & Updated address
5% 1%
% of migrated Children
100
%
100
%
2626
Migrated
Updated
adress
94%
Total
Updated Before
Reg
After Reg

37. Migrant Children
4%
By %
No
Reintegration
Migrant Children
80
3
77
Total Urban Children
Came alone
Came with family
96%
Came alone
With family

38. Major Findings
 Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk for
unsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among the
registered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
 Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only.
 Migration before registration is 5.22 %
 Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%.
 The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%.
 In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed.
 The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family.
 Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
 Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk for
unsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among the
registered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
 Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only.
 Migration before registration is 5.22 %
 Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%.
 The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%.
 In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed.
 The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family.
 Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
 Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk for
unsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among the
registered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
 Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only.
 Migration before registration is 5.22 %
 Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%.
 The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%.
 In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed.
 The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family.
 Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
 Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk for
unsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among the
registered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
 Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only.
 Migration before registration is 5.22 %
 Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%.
 The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%.
 In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed.
 The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family.
 Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.

39. Paintbrush
Picture
Thank you
Thank YouThank You
39
Paintbrush
Picture