SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Carcass Characteristics of Pasture-Raised Meat Goats
                                                    Semler*,         J.W. 1;   Bennett, M.           B. 2;   Escobar, E.            N. 3;   Gordon, D.                    G. 1;        Schoenian, S.                             G. 1;        Updike, M.                       S. 4

                                               1University    of Maryland Extension; 2West Virginia University Extension; 3University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD; 4University of Maryland, College Park




                                                                                     Materials & Methods                                                                                                                                  Results
                                                                            In 2009 (9) and 2010 (10) a subset of the pasture raised
                                                                                                                                                                                          2009                            2010
                                                                            goats were harvested.                                                                                                                                                                               Rib Eye Area, cm2
                                                                            The goats were weighed, harvested, and deboned.
                                                                                                                                                       No. of goats                         9                              10
                                                                                                                                                         LW (kg)                        32.7 ± 4.2                     26.0 ± 3.0
                                                                            Measurements taken included:
                                                                            • Pre-harvest live weight (LW)                                              HCW (kg)                        14.1 ± 1.9                     12.5 ± 1.9                        12.0


                                                                            •Hot carcass weight (HCW)                                                     DP, %                         43.1 ± 3.6                     48.1 ± 3.1                        10.0

                                                                            •Chilled carcass weight (CCW)
                                                                                                                                                        CCW (kg)                        13.2 ± 1.9                     12.2 ± 1.8                         8.0
                                                                            • Actual Rib eye area (A-REA)
                                                                            • Ultrasound Rib eye area (U-REA)                                          BWT (mm)                         10.1 ± 2.3                      5.1 ± 2.3                         6.0

                                                                            •Body wall thickness (BWT)
                                                                                                                                                       U-REA (cm2)                       8.0 ± 1.4                      6.5 ± 1.2                         4.0
                                                                            •Kidney and heart fat (KH)
                                                                            •Fat (F)                                                                   A-REA (cm2)                      11.5 ± 1.5                      6.7 ± 2.0                         2.0

                                                                            •Bone (B)                                                                     % KH                         0.98 ± 0.70                    0.76 ± 0.27                         0.0
                                                                            •Lean (L)                                                                                                                                                                                         2009                                 2010
                                                                                                                                                          %F                             6.1 ± 1.9                     2.0 ± 0.70
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Ultrasound        Carcass
                                                                            Data Calculated:                                                              %B                            32.2 ± 2.5                     32.7 ± 1.9
                                                                            •Dressing percentage (DP, %) HCW/LW                                           %L                            60.9 ± 3.2                     57.5 ± 2.4
                                                                            •Percent Kidney and heart fat (% KH) KH/CCW
                                                                            •Percent fat (% F) F/CCW                                                       CY                           25.4 ± 3.3                     25.3 ± 2.8                                        Measures of Carcass Fat
                                                                            •Percent bone (% B) B/CCW
                                                                            •Percent lean (% L) L/CCW
                                                                            •Carcass yield (Y) L/LW
                                                                                                                                                                   Carcass Percentages                                                                      12.0


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            10.0
                                                                                                                                                     70.0

                                                                                                                                                     60.0                                                                                                       8.0
                                                                                                                                                     50.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                6.0
                                                                                                                                                     40.0

                                                                                                                                                     30.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                4.0
                                                                                                                                                     20.0

                                                                                                                                                     10.0                                                                                                       2.0

                                                                                                                                                      0.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                0.0
                                                                                                                                                                 % fat            % bone            % lean              Yield
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        BWT, mm                    % KH                     % fat

                                                                                                                                                                                         2009     2010                                                                                           2009      2010
                   Introduction
The Western Maryland Pasture Based Meat Goat
Performance Test was initiated in 2006 at the University of
Maryland’s Western Maryland Research & Education Center
in Keedysville, MD. Since 2006, 263 (mostly) Kiko goats
have been evaluated.

While on test, the goats are evaluated for growth
performance, parasite resistance, and resilience. Another
goal of the test is to evaluate and compare the carcass
                                                                                            Conclusions
characteristics of meat goats consuming a pasture-only diet.
                                                                           Regression analysis showed U-REA and BWT to be the
                                                                           best indicators of percent lean in a goat carcass.
Towards the end of the testing period, all of the goats are
                                                                           The equation to predict percent lean was determined to be
scanned to determine rib eye area and back fat thickness.
                                                                           0.47 + 0.07 U-REA + 0.1 BWT (r2 =0.78).
In 2009, the first goats were harvested to collect carcass
                                                                           The equation to predict total pounds of meat in a goat
data. In 2009 and 2010, nineteen male goats were weighed,
                                                                           carcass was determined to be -0.22 + 0.18 LW + 4.93 U-
harvested, and deboned at Lambco LLC
                                                                           REA (r2 = 0.69).
(www.lambcomd.com), a USDA/custom abattoir in New
Windsor, MD.
                                                                           The lighter live and carcass weights and lower fat
                                                                           measurements of the goats harvested in 2010 were
                                                                           attributed to the extreme drought conditions. The higher
                                                                           dressing percentages of the goats harvested in 2010 can
                                                                           be explained by the inclusion of the organ meats in the
                     Objectives                                            carcasses.

 1. Characterize the carcasses of meat goats fed a                         Next step, Compare the carcass yield and carcass quality
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Acknowledgements
    pasture-only diet.                                                     of pasture vs. pen-fed goats.
                                                                                                                                             Thanks to Lambco LLC. for harvesting the goats. Thanks to Jim Pritchard for doing the ultrasound scanning. Thanks to the “goat
 2. Determine the accuracy of ultrasound for determining                                                                                     team” for their hard work and contributions to the performance testing program. Thanks to all our consigners for their commitment to
                                                                               1. Pasture only
    carcass characteristics.                                                                                                                 the performance testing of meat goats.
                                                                               2. Grain + hay
                                                                                                                                             University of Maryland Extension programs are open to all citizens without regard to race, color, gender, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation, marital or parental status, or national origin.

More Related Content

More from nacaa

A gsploration nacaa 2012 poster
A gsploration nacaa 2012 posterA gsploration nacaa 2012 poster
A gsploration nacaa 2012 posternacaa
 
Yutzy, nacaa2012, Poster
Yutzy, nacaa2012, PosterYutzy, nacaa2012, Poster
Yutzy, nacaa2012, Posternacaa
 
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012nacaa
 
Infante casella and carleo poster nj
Infante casella and carleo poster njInfante casella and carleo poster nj
Infante casella and carleo poster njnacaa
 
Nacaa annie's diverse audience poster
Nacaa annie's diverse audience posterNacaa annie's diverse audience poster
Nacaa annie's diverse audience posternacaa
 
Baker beef camp poster2
Baker beef camp poster2Baker beef camp poster2
Baker beef camp poster2nacaa
 
Byers2012 nacaa poster
Byers2012 nacaa posterByers2012 nacaa poster
Byers2012 nacaa posternacaa
 
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012nacaa
 
Gps 101 c_dillard
Gps 101 c_dillardGps 101 c_dillard
Gps 101 c_dillardnacaa
 
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)nacaa
 
Mg vphonetraining edcrrn
Mg vphonetraining edcrrnMg vphonetraining edcrrn
Mg vphonetraining edcrrnnacaa
 
Lentz es nonohwheat12
Lentz es nonohwheat12Lentz es nonohwheat12
Lentz es nonohwheat12nacaa
 
Haller hay feeding poster
Haller   hay feeding posterHaller   hay feeding poster
Haller hay feeding posternacaa
 
Shannon prec ag software nacaa poster
Shannon prec ag software nacaa posterShannon prec ag software nacaa poster
Shannon prec ag software nacaa posternacaa
 
Haller hay feeding poster
Haller   hay feeding posterHaller   hay feeding poster
Haller hay feeding posternacaa
 
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster2
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster22012 cotton beltwide curry poster2
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster2nacaa
 
Arnold reduce phos
Arnold reduce phosArnold reduce phos
Arnold reduce phosnacaa
 
Lantz poster2012
Lantz poster2012Lantz poster2012
Lantz poster2012nacaa
 
Hoorman nacaa2012
Hoorman nacaa2012Hoorman nacaa2012
Hoorman nacaa2012nacaa
 
Goodson poster
Goodson posterGoodson poster
Goodson posternacaa
 

More from nacaa (20)

A gsploration nacaa 2012 poster
A gsploration nacaa 2012 posterA gsploration nacaa 2012 poster
A gsploration nacaa 2012 poster
 
Yutzy, nacaa2012, Poster
Yutzy, nacaa2012, PosterYutzy, nacaa2012, Poster
Yutzy, nacaa2012, Poster
 
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012
Greenhalgh noxious weed poster for nacaa 2012
 
Infante casella and carleo poster nj
Infante casella and carleo poster njInfante casella and carleo poster nj
Infante casella and carleo poster nj
 
Nacaa annie's diverse audience poster
Nacaa annie's diverse audience posterNacaa annie's diverse audience poster
Nacaa annie's diverse audience poster
 
Baker beef camp poster2
Baker beef camp poster2Baker beef camp poster2
Baker beef camp poster2
 
Byers2012 nacaa poster
Byers2012 nacaa posterByers2012 nacaa poster
Byers2012 nacaa poster
 
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012
Poster gary gao_grapewineanalysisworkshop_nacaa_2012
 
Gps 101 c_dillard
Gps 101 c_dillardGps 101 c_dillard
Gps 101 c_dillard
 
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)
Md small flock research survey 2012 poster (1) draft (2)
 
Mg vphonetraining edcrrn
Mg vphonetraining edcrrnMg vphonetraining edcrrn
Mg vphonetraining edcrrn
 
Lentz es nonohwheat12
Lentz es nonohwheat12Lentz es nonohwheat12
Lentz es nonohwheat12
 
Haller hay feeding poster
Haller   hay feeding posterHaller   hay feeding poster
Haller hay feeding poster
 
Shannon prec ag software nacaa poster
Shannon prec ag software nacaa posterShannon prec ag software nacaa poster
Shannon prec ag software nacaa poster
 
Haller hay feeding poster
Haller   hay feeding posterHaller   hay feeding poster
Haller hay feeding poster
 
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster2
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster22012 cotton beltwide curry poster2
2012 cotton beltwide curry poster2
 
Arnold reduce phos
Arnold reduce phosArnold reduce phos
Arnold reduce phos
 
Lantz poster2012
Lantz poster2012Lantz poster2012
Lantz poster2012
 
Hoorman nacaa2012
Hoorman nacaa2012Hoorman nacaa2012
Hoorman nacaa2012
 
Goodson poster
Goodson posterGoodson poster
Goodson poster
 

Recently uploaded

Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docxPoojaSen20
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDThiyagu K
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxnegromaestrong
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptRamjanShidvankar
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Disha Kariya
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...KokoStevan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 

Semler carcass characteristics2011b

  • 1. Carcass Characteristics of Pasture-Raised Meat Goats Semler*, J.W. 1; Bennett, M. B. 2; Escobar, E. N. 3; Gordon, D. G. 1; Schoenian, S. G. 1; Updike, M. S. 4 1University of Maryland Extension; 2West Virginia University Extension; 3University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD; 4University of Maryland, College Park Materials & Methods Results In 2009 (9) and 2010 (10) a subset of the pasture raised 2009 2010 goats were harvested. Rib Eye Area, cm2 The goats were weighed, harvested, and deboned. No. of goats 9 10 LW (kg) 32.7 ± 4.2 26.0 ± 3.0 Measurements taken included: • Pre-harvest live weight (LW) HCW (kg) 14.1 ± 1.9 12.5 ± 1.9 12.0 •Hot carcass weight (HCW) DP, % 43.1 ± 3.6 48.1 ± 3.1 10.0 •Chilled carcass weight (CCW) CCW (kg) 13.2 ± 1.9 12.2 ± 1.8 8.0 • Actual Rib eye area (A-REA) • Ultrasound Rib eye area (U-REA) BWT (mm) 10.1 ± 2.3 5.1 ± 2.3 6.0 •Body wall thickness (BWT) U-REA (cm2) 8.0 ± 1.4 6.5 ± 1.2 4.0 •Kidney and heart fat (KH) •Fat (F) A-REA (cm2) 11.5 ± 1.5 6.7 ± 2.0 2.0 •Bone (B) % KH 0.98 ± 0.70 0.76 ± 0.27 0.0 •Lean (L) 2009 2010 %F 6.1 ± 1.9 2.0 ± 0.70 Ultrasound Carcass Data Calculated: %B 32.2 ± 2.5 32.7 ± 1.9 •Dressing percentage (DP, %) HCW/LW %L 60.9 ± 3.2 57.5 ± 2.4 •Percent Kidney and heart fat (% KH) KH/CCW •Percent fat (% F) F/CCW CY 25.4 ± 3.3 25.3 ± 2.8 Measures of Carcass Fat •Percent bone (% B) B/CCW •Percent lean (% L) L/CCW •Carcass yield (Y) L/LW Carcass Percentages 12.0 10.0 70.0 60.0 8.0 50.0 6.0 40.0 30.0 4.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 % fat % bone % lean Yield BWT, mm % KH % fat 2009 2010 2009 2010 Introduction The Western Maryland Pasture Based Meat Goat Performance Test was initiated in 2006 at the University of Maryland’s Western Maryland Research & Education Center in Keedysville, MD. Since 2006, 263 (mostly) Kiko goats have been evaluated. While on test, the goats are evaluated for growth performance, parasite resistance, and resilience. Another goal of the test is to evaluate and compare the carcass Conclusions characteristics of meat goats consuming a pasture-only diet. Regression analysis showed U-REA and BWT to be the best indicators of percent lean in a goat carcass. Towards the end of the testing period, all of the goats are The equation to predict percent lean was determined to be scanned to determine rib eye area and back fat thickness. 0.47 + 0.07 U-REA + 0.1 BWT (r2 =0.78). In 2009, the first goats were harvested to collect carcass The equation to predict total pounds of meat in a goat data. In 2009 and 2010, nineteen male goats were weighed, carcass was determined to be -0.22 + 0.18 LW + 4.93 U- harvested, and deboned at Lambco LLC REA (r2 = 0.69). (www.lambcomd.com), a USDA/custom abattoir in New Windsor, MD. The lighter live and carcass weights and lower fat measurements of the goats harvested in 2010 were attributed to the extreme drought conditions. The higher dressing percentages of the goats harvested in 2010 can be explained by the inclusion of the organ meats in the Objectives carcasses. 1. Characterize the carcasses of meat goats fed a Next step, Compare the carcass yield and carcass quality Acknowledgements pasture-only diet. of pasture vs. pen-fed goats. Thanks to Lambco LLC. for harvesting the goats. Thanks to Jim Pritchard for doing the ultrasound scanning. Thanks to the “goat 2. Determine the accuracy of ultrasound for determining team” for their hard work and contributions to the performance testing program. Thanks to all our consigners for their commitment to 1. Pasture only carcass characteristics. the performance testing of meat goats. 2. Grain + hay University of Maryland Extension programs are open to all citizens without regard to race, color, gender, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation, marital or parental status, or national origin.