we are giving only idea for making water channel for poor less un economical area for different counties where people need water for drinking we present presentation in univsty CIIT

2. SCHEME FORTHE CONSTRUCTION
OF WATER CHANNELS

3. ProjectTeam Roles and Responsibilities
[ABDUL
QADEER KHAN]
Project Manager
[ABDUL QADIR]
SURVEY ENGR
[SHAH FAHAD]
MATERIAL ENGR
[ABDUR RASHEED]
ESTIMATION
ENGR
[JAWAD
AHMAD]
SUPERVIZER
[ASFANDYAR]
Administrative
Assistant

4. PROJECT INTIATION WHYWE NEED THIS PROJECT ?
1. The oldWater supply scheme had water supply ratio up to 56% and
that was not enough.
2. The existing system was planned to improve so that it could cover
water supply ratio up to 92% .
3. According to the draft final report of the project the target year was
2015 with total target capacity of 357lit/sec comprised of 196lit/sec by
surface water and 161lit/sec by ground water resources.
 AREA REQUIRED , PIPES , BORING MACHINES & MOTORS
 TEAM IS SELECTED ON BASIS OFTHEIR CAPABIIITY

5. • SURVEYING
 THERE IS EXCESS NEED OFTHIS PROJECT FORTHAT PLACE.
1. Selection of the particular study areaThe ATD water supply
scheme covers the vast area so area under ATDTMA is selected
for research purpose.
2. Determination of the required information After the selection of
the particular area, the required information has been
determined (projected population, water demand etc.)
3. Data CollectionThe information such as existing population,
growth rate, water demand, supply hours, piping network,
elevation of hydraulic structures has been collected for the
selected area of the project

6.  PROJECT CONTEXT
 PROJECT GOAL
(to facilitate people with pure water for drinking and irrigation )
 STAKE HOLDERS
Wassca ,over team, and the people who get advantage
 BOUDARIES
 All of the waters reaching the
.
solution of border sanitation and other border water quality problems.
preservation of the area name as the international boundary
 FEASIBILE OR NOT

7. INPUTS FORTHE PROJECT
 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. SPECIFICATIONS OF OVER ALL PROJECT
2. BUDGET FROM WHICH SOURCE
Waseca is the main source of over project
3. DESIGN
4. COST OF PIPES

8. Basic data for 2015 (AbbottabadTMA)
 Existing tanks 08
 Total pipe length 1010854ft
 Total houses served 7935
 Total population served 53720
 Total demand (GPM) 1273.24
 Total demand 3183.2
 Material of pipe Steel pipe 10 years old - 33.80 km - - C=120
 Note:The information shown are truly based on available data and distribution pipe
line network map

9. Cost Analysis
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
$200,000
materials Manufacturing Salaries Maintenance Office lease Warehouse lease Insurance Vehicles research
cast of project

10. Selection of pipe
V=Q/(A)

11. • STRATEGIC LEVEL
1. DESIGN FOR SERVING
2. SERVES GOODWITH LOW COST
3. VISITING DIFFERENT AREAS OF ROOM FOR
THE PROJECT
4. IF NOT SUCCESSFULTHANWHATTO DO ?

12. • PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
1. QUALITY OFTHE PROJECT
2. TEAM FORTHE PROJECT
 Excellent Communicator
 Knowledge of Project Management Principles
 Highly Organized
 Accurate Estimating Skills
 Self-Assured
1. LOCATION
2. SOURCES ( earth water , rain )
3. DESIGNING (closed channel)
channel

13. • HISTORICAL INFORMATION
1. DEPARTMENT IS GOOD IN CLEARANCE OF
BIILS OR NOT
2. RESPONSETOTHE PREVIOUS PROJECT
3. DEFEND THE PROJECT IF FAILS OR NOT

14. • TRANSFORMATIONS (TOOLS &TECHNIQUES )
1. VALUE JUDGEMENT
 CLOSED CONDUITS
 PROPER LOCATION
 PROPER ELEVATION

15.  COMPARISONOF ENVIRONMENT
 WHETHERTHE PLACE IS GOOD FORTHE
PROJECT OR NOT
 CONTRIBUTIONTOTHE SOCIETY
 PROJECT IS OF ASWATER SCHEMEWHETER IT
IS BENEFITINGTHE SOCIETYOR NOT

16. OUTPUT OF PROJECT INTIATION
 PROJECT CHARTER
 PMAND KEY STAFF IDENTIFICATION
 ASSUMPTIONS
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
2009 2015 2018 2020
Growth rate
papulation by nadra visitor per month student from other areas

17. PROJECT PLANNING
PHASE 2

18. DEVICING AND DESIGNING
SCHEME
 As per research study objectives, the assessment of this water supply scheme would also be done by EPANET.
 EPANET is an American freeware software that models the Hydraulic and Water Quality Behavior of Water
Distribution Piping Systems.
 This research study will stick to the distribution piping system as per defined objectives.
 Working through EPANET
 Scanning of Distribution pipe network sheets
 Converting of scanned images to BMP files
 Using .bmp files as a backdrop image in EPANET
 Scaling of backdrop image
 Drawing objects on map using drawing tools
 Assigning values to objects as per available data
 Analyzing pipe network and understanding the results

19. Map 1 & 2 for background image

20. Map 3 & 4 without background image

21. Units used in map
> Consider the highlighted part of the map which contains
theT-17 as a tank
> T17-01,T17(01-02),T17(01-03),T17(03-04),T17(04-05),T >
17(04-06),T17(03-07),T17(07-08) andT17(07-09) pipes
> J1, J2, J3, J4, J5, J6, J7, J8 and J9 as junctions.
The arrows show the direction of flow

22. TRANSFORMATIONS (TOOLS &TECHNIQUES )
 BUDGET ESTMIATION
 PHYSICAL SCHEDULING
 6 MONTHS ETIMATEDTIME FRAME .
 FINANICIAL SCHEDULING
 BUDGETWILL BETAKEN FROM (WESSCA)AND (TMA)
 SELECTIONCREATERIA
 STAISFYINGTHE QUALITY FORTHE PROJECT , FUTURE OREINTEDOR NOT,
SELECTIONOFTEAM FORTHE PROJECT

23. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE
 AS PROJECTION DESCRIPTION IS GIVEN IMPLEMENTATION
PROCEDUREWILL BE ACCORDINGTO IT
 PROJECT STRUCTURE
 SUPERVISIONAND MONITORING

24. RULESTO FOLLOW
 EVERY PROJECT HAS ITS OWNWORK
 STANDARDSARE DEFINED
 FOLLOWTHE STANDARDANDAVOIDTAKING RISKS.
 SHOULD NOT BE DAMAGINGANY PERSONS LANDS ROAD ETC.
 BENCHMARKS FORTHE PROJECT
 TIME FRAME
 QUALITY

25. OUT PUTS FORTHE PROJECT PLANNING
 TEAM CONTRACTS
 ACCORDINGTOTHEIR POST OR DESGINATIONSCONTRACTSARE SET UP
 SCOPE
 TIME (TIME FRAMETO PROJECT)
 COST ( PROJECT BUDGET )
 RESOURCES

26. PROJECT SCHEDULE
 As per research study objectives, the assessment
of this water supply scheme would also be done by
EPANET.
 EPANET is anAmerican freeware software that
models the Hydraulic andWater Quality Behavior
ofWater Distribution Piping Systems.
 This research study will stick to the distribution
piping system as per defined objectives.
WBS
 WORK IS DIVIDEDACCORDINGTOTHE
EFFICIENCY OF FOCAL PERSON

27. MONITORING AND CONTROLLING
PHASE 3

28. 1. PARAMETERS FORTHE PROJECT
PMWILL LOOK AFTER
 BUDGET
 TIME FRAME
 QUALITY MATERIALS
 DUTIES , RISKS
 DUITIES ASSOCIATED
Rule for construction

29.  COLLECTING DATA AND REPORTING
 DATA FOR SAMPLE OF WATER
 DATA FOR SITEVISITING
 DATA FOR BORING OF WATER
 CHECKINGOUTTHE DEPTH
 DATA FOR MARKETING
 COST OF PIPES ,TANKS , AGGREGATES , CEMENT
 COMMUNICATION AND REPORTING
 PM WILL BETHERE ON UPPER LEVEL FOR COLLECTING DATA AND REPORTING ITTO
FUTHER STAKE HOLDERS.
Water sampleSoil sample

30. Risk Management Plan
Risk Probability Impact Owner Mitigation Plan
Budget cuts may
reduce staff, affecting
project scope and
schedule
Medium High
Project
Manager

31. Success Factors
 Identify elements that are key to the success of the project, such as:
 Satisfied clients or stakeholders
 Met project objectives
 Completed within budget
 Delivered on time

32. Quality Management and Performance Measures
 Define quality management plans
 How will you monitor and control costs?
 How will you monitor and control schedule?

33.  EFFECTIVE CO-ORDINATION
 MEMBERS SHOUD BE PROACTIVE
 SELFISHNESS SHOULD NOT BETHERE
 EVERYTHINGTHAT COMES 1ST ISTO BE COMPLETED FIRST
 SENERGIZATION
 SHARPENYOUR SAW

34. PROJECT EXCEUTITION
Phase 4

35.  REALIZINGOUR PLAN
 DESIGN
 SCHEME
 LAND SELECTION
 DUTIESASSIGNED
 FINANCE
 TIME FRMAE

36. INPUTS FOR PROJECT EXECUTION
 PROJECT PLANNING DOCUMENT
 RELATED DOCUMENT
TMA ,WASSCA ,CONTONMENT BOARD
 INSITUTIONAL RAGULATION
PROJECT PAPERWILL BE MADEACCORDINGTOTHE DEPARTMENT OFWASSCA
 ROOM FORCHANGE
 BUDGET
 PLAN

37. RECOMMENDATION
 SWARMING EFFECT
 WORKING EFFECIENTLY IN STARTING
 INFORMATION SHARING
 EVERY INFORMATION IS SHAREDTHROUGH OUT
 STARTING OF PROJECT ISVERY IMPORTANT
 REPORTING

38. PHASE : 5
PROJECT CLOSING
PROJECTCLOSING

39.  OUR PROJECT IS PLANNEDTO FOR NORMALCLOSING IF IT IS COMPLTEDON
GIVENTIME FRAME
 OUR PROJECT CANNOT BE SETAS PREMATUREDWHETHER ILWILL FAIL ORWILL
BE SUCCESSFUL
 ITWILL FAIL IF IS NOT PROPERLY EXECUTED PLANNEDAND COMPLETEDONTIME

40. FOR NORMAL CLOSING
AUDIT
 AUDITTEAMEWILL EXAMINE PROJECT as
 HOW PROJECTWAS MANAGED ?
 HOW PROJECT HASTAKEN HIS BUDGET ?
 SATISFYINGTHEIR REQUIREMENTS ?
 CONTRIBUTINGTOWARDTHE PURPOSEOR NOT ?
 THEWILL BE DECIDEDWHETER IT IS SUCCESSFULOR NOT ?

41. AUDIT LIFECYCLE
 AUDIT INTIATION
 PURPOSE
 OBJECTIVE
 PLANNING
 SELECTIONOF DATAACCORDINGTO PLAN
 PREMILINARYANALYSIS
 RECORDS
 DEGREE OF COMPLETION

42. CLOSURE
 CLEARANCE
 RECORDINGSOF DATA
 CLOSINGACCOUNTS
 REPORTING