3. How do we better elicit responses from farmers to the question of what information they need?

4. How do we vet, do quality control, on what the answers to those questions might be

5. How do we develop a system to deliver answers back to farmers and have info flowing into it?

6. It’s important to realize the differences between small, medium and large holders. Which of these should be targeted?

7. Micro holders are less well connected to villages.

8. Perhaps targeting production programs don’t work for them and they instead need a safety net or a cash transfer program.

9. Productivity projects won’t work for micro holders.

10. From the perspectives of technology adoption and value chain analysis, is the singular focus on women farmers helpful or not?

11. Design of project – value chain project that targets women in 1/3 of villages, men and women in 1/3 and 1/3 control.

13. Design: How does health messaging play a part aside from increased income due to value chain interventions?

14. In one area you work on value chain intervention.

15. In a different geographic area you use health communication intervention.

16. USAID is always talking about value chains and nutrition but where is the evidence?

17. What about mutually beneficial technologies?

18. What are the most important situational factors to think of when designing projects? For example, differences in intrahousehold dynamics, even within a country, can affect how the country will work.