How The Internet Has Impacted Personal Privacy

How Has The Internet Changed Personal Privacy
Personal Privacy I feel that the Internet has changed personal privacy in many ways. The Internet can track and save everything you look up at any
given time. Anybody who is computer savvy can look up anything you put up on the Internet. People on the Internet can take your photos without
your permission; this can be dangerous if you are posting pictures of your kids and the rest of your family. Once you put in your information so
many times the computer will start to remember all your information like your name, address, phone number, credit card number, and so on. Also if
the company were to fail they would sell your personal information to other places so they can get paid for your information that is supposed to be
kept secret between
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Internet and Personal Privacy Essay
Internet and Personal Privacy
In the world of today most records can be easily accessed by a home computer. Even Governmental records can be viewed. Some believe this has
benefits, while others are screaming about invasion of privacy. Heated debates can go on for many hours about this topic. Each side has people who
devote all their time and energy to see their side of the argument prevail.
The Freedom of Information Act which was established in 1966 states that all people shall have access to federal records. This allows the public to be
kept abreast of the workings in the government. Any person may request a document, which the government must present, however, the government
can not synthesize a document. It is even possible to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. This would not have been possible with the Freedom of Information Act.
There are nine exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act, national security, internal agency rules, information exempted by another federal statute,
trade secrets, internal agency memoranda, personal privacy, investigatory records, and other exemptions.
Does the public's right to know out weigh one's personal privacy? The personal computer does make privacy difficult. Databases have been created
simply to hold ones personal information, and many times these databases can be accessed by any computer–geek. One such database is the National
Crime Information Center (NCIC), created by Herbert Hoover. This database holds information on every American person ever arrested in the United
States.
How could this information not be beneficial? Many times the information is neither accurate nor complete. What could happen if the wrong hands
accessed these files, such as a possible employer? The computer has made this threat a reality. Ever wonder where junk mail comes from? Currently,
there is "a database of the names, addresses, and marketing information on 120 million residents of the United States". This information may not seem
very personal. But many times this simple information can lead to more personal information.
Privacy could still be invaded without the use of a computer; however, the computer has made it easier and faster. The

1984 Personal Privacy Analysis
Diamond Hemrick12/03/12
1984 Essay
Personal privacy is the state of being apart from other people or concealed from their view; solitude; and seclusion. The idea of personal privacy is now
non–existent in today's society due to the improvement in surveillance technology and software, control of sex, love, and marriage, and thoughtcrime
and thought police.
Surveillance has become an uprising issue lately in today's society similar to the use of telescreens in the book, 1984. The telescreen was essentially a
2–way TV capable of allowing thought police to view and listen to anything that is in its vision.
"He took his scribbling pad on his knee and pushed back his chair so as to get as far away from the telescreen as possible. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Party cannot control people's emotions towards people they admire. To remove the pleasure and joy of amorous relationships, the Party heavily
encouraged the children to spy on the parents and adults that surround them and turn them in if they saw any suspicious activities. The party wants all
affection directed toward Big Brother and its principles. They also heavily advocate complete abstinence and procreation only through artificial
insemination through the Junior Anti–Sex League, if they chose however to disapprove of the thought of artificial insemination, there act is
considered as a"duty to the Party" (for only the purposes of procreation). Later, when he meets Julia, Winston relishes the freedom of being able to
love someone in a physical and emotional way for the first time in his life. Winston is only able to rebel against the Party through his affair with
Julia, even though this love is destroyed in the end by the thought police and Mr. Charrington. In today's day and age governments control
relationships and marriages through arranged marriages and forced marriages. An arranged marriage is a type of martial union where the bride and
groom are selected by a third party rather than themselves. Most times the third party consists of family, friends, and trusted advisers. A forced
marriage however is when one or both spouses are coerced into marriage without their own consent. Few places around the world actually practice these
rituals: South Asia, Africa, Middle East, Latin America, South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia and parts of

Defending Privacy of Personal Information Essay
Defending Privacy of Personal Information
Privacy does not have a single definition and it is a concept that is not easily defined. Information privacy is an individual's claim to control the terms
under which personal information is acquired, disclosed, and used [9]. In the context of privacy, personal information includes any information relating
to or traceable to an individual person [ 1]. Privacy can be defined as a fundamental human right; thus, privacy protection which involves the
establishment of rules governing the collection and handling of personal data can be seen as a boundary line as how far society can intrude into a
person's affairs.
The Internet offers many benefits but it also creates many threats that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some combination of these individual solutions needs to be integrated to ensure adequate privacy protection on the Internet.
Comprehensive laws Under this approach, industry develops rules for the protection of privacy that are enforced by the industry and overseen by the
privacy agency. This model is adopted by the European Union to ensure compliance with its data protection regime.
Sectoral Laws United States has avoided enacting general data protection rules in favor of specific sectoral laws. The drawbacks with this approach
are that it requires that new legislation be introduced with each new technology so protections frequently lag behind and the problem of a lack of an
oversight agency. The lack of legal protections for individual's privacy on the Internet in the United States is an example of its limitations.
Self Regulation Under this approach, companies and industry bodies establish codes of practice and engage in self–policing. The major problems are
adequacy and enforcement since industry codes have tended to provide only weak protections and lack enforcement.
Privacy–Enhancing Technologies and self–help Today's privacy enhancing technologies are often cumbersome to use, unfriendly, require a degree of
knowledge exceeding that of the common Internet users, some are poorly designed while others may be designed to facilitate law enforcement access.
Knowledgeable users of the Internet can employ a range of programs

Privacy Of Personal Privacy
The issue with one's personal privacy coexisting with society's public safety is that it cannot occur. This controversy is a complex situation due to the
large amount of cameras and microphones installed throughout everywhere you go today. It is almost impossible to not be invasive of one's privacy.
The topic has silently existed for decades, however with technology enhancing at a rapid rate, the discussion has surfaced and several writers have
decided to explore the matter in–depth. In the "The Anonymity Experiment" written by Catherine Price, she tests this idea of invisibility of living
"off the radar" for an entire week. She withdrew a week's worth of cash, purchased an untraceable cell phone, cut off all ties that required a name,
address and phone number and proceeded to other numerous amounts of extremes. However, after being anonymous for an entire week, Price soon
discovered that "no matter what you do, you'll never really know if you're successful at keeping private," (Price 395). She states this because there is
no possibility of figuring out whether you are being tracked or not when it comes to the resources that available out there. Nonetheless, the measures
and the lengths she went to be extreme were necessary to achieve complete privacy and she believes she "did a pretty good job" (Price 395). Aside from
Price's perspective of this successful privacy, lawyer and writer Wendy Kaminer, communicates a different view of public safety with privacy. Kaminer
writes

Loss Of Personal Privacy
If the future has strict government surveillance on citizens' internet activities, that would be detrimental to the cherished ideal that is the freedom of
speech. Even though we would still be allowed to tweet, text or post anything, there would be a strong pair of eyes watching us at all times, that can
give make people feel uneasy about sharing their views.
Think about it, people being watched for everything they do, like what they are reading, writing and even when they are communicating with others
while sharing their own thoughts and opinions on political and social issues. The loss of personal privacy can have a psychological impact on citizens,
for it implicates that we can't criticize the government on its flaws or wrongdoings without

Essay on SwedenвЂ™s Position on Personal Privacy in Cyberspace
Sweden's Position on Personal Privacy in Cyberspace
The Internet and computer age has enabled people to work faster and more efficiently, with practically unlimited access to information. As much as the
technology boom has made our lives easier, as with most good inventions, there is some negativity that must be dealt with. The dissemination of
information on the global network has put personal privacy at risk. Obviously, we are not going to give up new technologies that enrich human life for
the sake of maintaining our privacy; however, measures must be taken to keep the public, or government, from abusing the Internet and computer
databases for malevolent reasons. Every country in the world has its own policies on human rights to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Instrument of Government Act deals specifically with Swedish fundamental rights to privacy as provided by the
government. This article promises that the government will conduct itself "with respect for the equal rights of all and the liberty and dignity of the
private person." Moreover, the "public institutions shall secure equal rights for men and women and protect the private and family lives of private
persons."[2] The Swedish Constitution also guarantees individual protection against body searches, house searches, mail and other written
correspondence searches, and eavesdropping on telephone conversations (Chapter 2, Article 6). In perusing Chapter 2 in its entirety, protection from
political and religious discrimination is very important to Swedes. The articles within this chapter unequivocally declare Swedish and foreign national
rights to gather, assemble, worship, express, have access to information, and to associate with public institutions of their choosing.
Sweden enacted laws concerning personal privacy several years before the European Union did and is even considered the forbearer of such landmark
legislation in the entire world.[3] Such legislation that will be discusses within this paper include the Data Act of

1984 Personal Privacy Essay
The fourth amendment protects personal privacy and prohibits unreasonable searches unless probable cause or with a warrant present. Throughout the
years it has decreased in the U.S. The surveillance in the book 1984 invades everyone's privacy and even their thoughts, there is no such thing as
privacy in Oceania. Whereas in the U.S. they use surveillance to find people specifically but are able to at anyones information.
In 1984, Big Brother is the leader of Oceania that everyone must do what he says. There are posters of his face everywhere and is said to be watching
you through telescreens that are located everywhere to make sure you are not planning on going against him. Big Brother controls everything and
everyone and can see anything you do. This may sound frightening but that is becoming the truth in the U.S. In the U.S. today the government is able to
hack into any average person to anyone as important as the president. As said by Edward Snowden, " NSA and any intelligence is focused on getting
intelligence wherever ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the book 1984 there is not a variety of items available. Since the government doesn't let anyone leave they do not know what some items are or
items slowly disappear out of existence. They are limited as well on what they can purchase especially when it comes to clothes. Another word for
politics is government. It is individuals or groups debating or conflicting to gain power. The government in the book 1984 is called the Inner Party.
Winston knows O'Brian, who is part of the Inner Party and is at the top of the Social class. The inner party consists of only two to three percent of
Oceania's population. O'Brian had told Winston that he is able to turn off his telescreen and spy on the Outer party. The Outer Party consists of a lot
more people than the Inner Party but not as many. They are the middle class of Oceania. Lastly the Proles is the rest of the population.

Personal Privacy: Feed By Matthew Tobin Anderson
Feed by Matthew Tobin Anderson is a compelling and alluring novel about the boundaries of personal privacy. In a futuristic world, the United State's
technology and advertising have taken away every inch of privacy and freedom that the citizens once had because of the "feed." The "feed" is an
advanced internet system that connects you to a variety of everyday occurrences, such as types of music, entertainment programs, and even others'
memories. In this world, normalities include parents designing what their children would look like, schools being run by major corporations, and
corporations holding more power than the president. The main character Titus, a son of a middle class family, meets Violet, Titus's love interest for
majority of the

Personal Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy 1.Introduction 1.1.This policy would explain the kind of data we collect, why we collect it and how we use the data collected. 1.2.We
are committed to safeguard your privacy, and will never reveal or pass any of your personal and professional information to anyone outside the
company, under any circumstances. 1.3.We will ask you to consent to our use of cookies from time to time when we need to collect general,
non–personal statistical information about your website use. 1.4.We will only send an email when it is relevant or directly related to your inquiry or
the services you acquire from us. 1.5.We will protect any communication and correspondence between you and our website, including files and other
data, by prohibiting... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When you request for information about our services, we will collect the following information: 2.4.1.Email information needed to register to our
website. 2.4.2.Profile information including your name, date of birth, educational details, and employment details. 2.4.3.Information you provide
when subscribing to our newsletter or email notification, including name and email address. 3.How we use data collected 3.1.Any information you
provide will be used solely for the purpose of fulfilling your requests, or whenever it is necessary for the purpose of this policy. 3.2.We will disclose
your information to any member of the company, provided that it is necessary for the purpose of this policy. 3.3.We will disclose personal
information only when required by the law, in connection with any legal proceedings, and to establish our legal rights. 3.4.We will not disclose your
information to third parties, except as required in this policy. 3.5.Personalise our website for you, including providing personalised pages for you.
3.6.Better communicate with you as a potential customer. 3.7.Determine which specific page of our website is appealing to you. 3.8.Determine which
ads are interesting to you. 3.9.Help ensure you're not served the same ads

Personal And Demands Privacy Protection
Automobiles today offer increasingly advanced technologies that make our driving experience safer, more environmentally responsible, and more
gratifying. As manufacturers advance technology in our vehicles we need to recognize that the automobile industry needs to take active steps to defend
our privacy. A number ofprivacy issues are currently facing this industry as a result of big data collections being part of the new innovative
technologies on the forefront of this new age of the "connected" car.
By definition connect cars are cars that communicate with data centers to deliver services that enhance auto safety, convenience, and provide luxuries
such as entertainment services. Some of that data is very personal and demands privacy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These small computers also contain the ability to record vehicle data to examine and increase performance. Navigation technologies and the vehicles'
ability to connect mobile devices with the in–car technologies have also profoundly changed the manner in which drivers and the vehicles themselves
can communicate while driving. This new technology has, and does utilize, a greatly increased ability to gather driving information. These
information–gathering abilities are used by car manufacturers to provide personalized services and improved driver and even passenger experiences,
but in the wrong hands this information could also be used criminally. Wireless technologies in particular, create susceptibilities to hacking that could
be used to invade or even possibly assault a user's privacy, or modify the operation of the vehicle.
With these technologies in effect, we are confronted with a number of ethical issues unique to this age of the "Connected Car". In regard to Big Data
Collections, to what degree should it be acceptable, and to what amount of our privacy should we be giving in exchange for our vehicles' luxuries and
safety?
To start, let's take a look at vehicle data collection and its potential use for legal purposes. Data is collected and stored in large datacenters that
accessible to our car manufactures. Stored in their datacenters is information on everything we do while driving. They collect data on our speed, tire
pressure, degrees of wheel

Personal Data Privacy . Frame Analysis And Advocacy Field
Personal Data Privacy
Frame Analysis and Advocacy Field Guide
This framing analysis includes 10 recent print news articles that address personal data privacy. The 5 dominant frames identified include: unauthorized
data collection and misuse, commercial application of personal data, civil liberties (personal data in the legal system), data protection, and innovation.
There were Pro and Con arguments present for each frame with the exception of the last, no Con arguments were present for the innovation category
in the admittedly small sample of 10 articles. Eight of the 10 articles were reporting on the findings of proceedings of a court case or proposed policy
concerning data privacy, the other two were reporting on business ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Millions of users and billions of dollars are implicated in the debate. The Pro argument is made by large tech companies, and government agencies
like Dept. of Homeland Security. Con arguments are made by consumer protection groups, government agencies like the Federal Trade Commission,
and civil rights groups. The bulk collection of data is an issue being pursued in the EU, implicating the US global surveillance system and the US
Foreign Surveillance Act, for this reason we see the United States Government present in many facets of the frame.
Commercial Application of Personal Data
Value: Collective Good Privacy vs Profits
On the pro side of the debate we find a lot of the most powerful tech companies and research firms up against regulatory agencies and civil rights
advocates. Proponents argue that aggregate data collection is harmless, makes our live easier, and is not invasive. Critics argue that the aggregate
collection and manipulation of personal data for corporate use is akin to the big brother analogies and use terms like "psychological warfare."
Proponents argue it is the 'currency of the digital economy.' The 'digital economy' referred to is already highly privatized, with the news media, tech
companies, US Federal Government, and increasingly politicians themselves are among many players that benefit from aggregate data collection.
Civil Liberties (Personal Data in the legal system)
Value: Justice
In this frame I am labeling the pro argument as,

RFID Tags and Invasion of Personal Privacy Essay
RFID Tags and Invasion of Personal Privacy
Historically, the advent of innovative, influential technology has reformed our lives in post–industrial America, creating new amenities on hand, along
with altering conventional laws governing this facet of modern living. The revolutionary and global capability of telecommunications has shaped new
means for dealing with information, and changed the role of a private citizen among this new technology. Traditionally in America, private citizens have
been separate from government or public involvement in personal matters such as identity, and unique characteristics defining that identity. Lately, radio
frequency identification (RFIDs) is an upcoming method for tracking objects or even ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Use of a credit card, debit card or check can directly link someone's identity to the product purchased. In addition to this function, the FDA approved
the "Verichip", a microchip embedded under the skin, which is able to convey medical information in an emergency (Dipert 52). Persons, aware or
unaware of the tag, have little control over their personal information within these databases, whether it is consumer or medically related.
Senator Debra Bowen proposed a bill in Redondo Beach, California contending that the organization using the tag and its information capability must:
have customer consent, detach or destroy the tag after leaving the store, and the customer be guaranteed anonymity (Anonymous 91). It wasn't until
this planned legislation protecting citizens' personal information existed, that privacy was defended against the RFID technology. Initiative is in place
to use RFID technology in the market. For instance, Wal–mart projects 250 stores with active tag system by June 2005 (Dipert 54). The San Francisco
Public Library has also planned to spend $1 million on a RFID system, to associate personal identity to book checkouts (Anonymous 92). Under these
conditions, corporations or the government may have the ability to monitor anyone's personal information or activity. In order to realize the effect of
RFID tags, in addition to new laws, advocates of civil rights such as the ACLU and CASPIAN have to be

The Influence Of Drug Testing On Personal Privacy
A man named Louis Freeh once said "The American people must be willing to give up a degree of personal privacy in exchange for safety and
security." As humans, we have a desire to keep our lives private and secure. However, security cannot come unless we give up parts of our privacy. Day
by day we take actions to keep people safe that we mostly are not aware of. In our lives, we surrender our privacy for communal safety by doing drug
tests, going into places with security measures, and by using the internet.
One way that we give up our personal privacy for community safety is by drug testing. In many jobs, licenses, and schools people are required to take
drug tests. These tests are done to make sure that the safety of others is not hindered.

Companies, Ethics, and Privacy of Personal Information Essay
Introduction
Personal data is quickly becoming a commodity in today's high technology world. This information is used by banks, investment and brokerage
companies, credit card merchants, government agencies (local, state and federal), and consumer product–based companies. Most people probably don't
realize the amount of information that's shared between companies, or how often it's done. Many companies sell and share customer data to help sell
products and find out what new products they should produce. Other uses include gathering information about inventory levels to help better determine
what types of products are bought at which store, when and how often. This can be used for inventory and production, to make sure that the store (or ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, let's say that company A has a very formal set of policies and procedures for storing your data, where it can only be accessed through
specific channels and authorization. On the other hand, there's company B, who doesn't have any formal security policy. They're willing to send your
data to anyone who hands them a check, and don't even tell you what data was sent and to whom. Often, the only way people find out is when they
discover fraudulent charges on their credit cards, mysterious access to their bank accounts, or people obtaining loans and other items in their name.
I feel that companies have a moral and ethical responsibility to ensure to protect our data from being compromised, but also to inform us who they're
sharing this information with and how it will be used, in addition to making sure that it's not used for any other purpose.
Different types of data that are commonly shared
I personally find the amount of information presently available to be somewhat staggering, if not downright scary. If someone managed to put a
number of databases together, I would be scared to find out what would be discovered. Some common examples of company data that are often shared
include the following.
Buying habits, from Safeway "club card" purchases, web sites like Amazon, etc.
Names, addresses, phone numbers
Driver's licenses and vehicle

Personal Privacy
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explain what I use to protect my personal privacy. There are many different things that can be use to protect someone's
information and keep hackers from accessing their computer. Some people use anti–virus, firewalls and anti–spam software to help protect their
personal privacy. As we all know with today's technology having just anti–virus or firewalls are not good enough, but having something is better than
nothing. They do not protect you from new or custom–made viruses and evil–scripts. There is no one solution to protect you from Identity Theft, it's just
too many threats to keep up with, and having one software will not do the job for you. One key to protecting your information would be ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
A packet filter will monitor all packets leaving and entering my computer. If I am going to leave data on my machine I will usually encrypt it,
which makes it much harder to access it. By me encrypting my data no one will be able to access it unless they have the password or secret key that
allows them to be able to decrypt it. Those are just the few things that I use on my computer to protect my personal privacy. The most important
element of protecting my personal privacy is me, because if I don't put it out there or leave it on my computer then no one can access

Personal Privacy or National Security
Personal Privacy or National Security
William Shelton
ENG122: English Composition
Prof. Lisa Clark
August 7, 2012
Defining National Security VS Personal Privacy is a matter of looking at the basic nature of each. From research collected there is a consensus that
we need balance. Too much of one hurts the other and vise versa. There are a couple of articles that range from Civil Liberties to the birth of public
right to know that support the overall claim. Talks about the effects of censorship in different situations like war and peace will help prove that a
balance needs to be forged. The problem here isn't the definition of personal vs national security, but the survival of each in light of each other. There is
history in our nation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This kind of action is completely unnecessary and undermines our Fourth Amendment. National security is the ability to protect our borders through
homeland security while upholding the rights of nation. Privacy when openly tampered with is distorted. Nobody acts the same knowingly being
watched. Information finds another way. There have been studies on lesser issues like workers. There is more productivity when people think
they are being watched. The same when our liberties are at stake. What are people to do when it's done for the wrong reasons? Like when an
African American see's a sign that separates white and color bathrooms. Another would be when the Jews were forced to where a star then live
separately in their own projects. The US jokes about our nation being like fraternity. Every new group gets picked on. The Jew's for being good with
money. The Mexicans for being illegal's and now it's the Arab's turn. But Arab's are all terrorist somehow. We have seen terror before from the
Unabomber, the KKK, and columbine shooting. How do we keep up with inflation? The government finds one way to gather information and terrorist
adapt. When civil liberties get trampled in the process more anti–American groups rise to the occasion creating more danger inside America and out. A
different example can be Adolf Hitler as a ruthless dictator and his main success as a dictator was propaganda. It

Personal Narrative: The Right To Privacy
Currently, the United States is in a crisis: a privacy crisis. For several years now, cell phones have had encryption technology built in to defend phones
from having their data breached and stolen by hackers. Phones have been secure against even the most intelligent criminals, leaving people with a
reassuring sense of protection. Recently, however, the US government and the FBI have challenged suchsecurity in the court and plan to strip it to its
bare bones to leave people vulnerable. The FBI has begun pressuring tech giants such as Apple and Google to create a "backdoor" into phones,
allowing government agencies to achieve access to data on secured phones. This has led to great indecision over whether or not tech companies should
be forced ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It's not that these tech giants are supporting criminal activities, though. Wherever possible, while also maintaining security, these companies legally
assist the government with criminal cases. Google's CEO Sundar Pichai responded to the issue on Twitter, stating that Google,"Gives law enforcement
access to data based on valid legal orders." However, Pichai reaffirms his company's stance that, while most tech companies–including both Google and
Apple–are willing to assist in criminal cases, it is wholly different than,"Requiring companies to enable hacking of their own customers' devices &
data." The government is crossing the line between asking a company for help vs. forcing them to change their intellectual

Personal Privacy Analysis
On a warm early summer day in the Utah desert, my friend and I, tuned up our bikes in preparation of another intense day of mountain biking. Days
before, I had lost cell phone reception about an hour after we had left the main road. In the arid hills where we set up our camp, we truly were
disconnected from the world. While we worked on our bikes, conversation flowed from topic to topic. Both of us being strong headed, semi–college
educated, guys in their twenties our conversations and arguments could always shifted back toward technology. Eventually we started talking about
Edward Snowden and the revelations of mass data collection on American citizens by the National Security Administration. As the conversation flowed
my friend countered... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After the attacks on 9/11 there were massive steps taken by the United States government to increase its spying and information gathering not only
abroad but domestically. The premise of this demand for domestic information was for the government to monitor its citizen interactions, this was
conduced by tapping and recording citizens phone calls, email messages and other forms of communication done over a technological interface. All
these steps were put in place under to pretense of catching "terrorists" embedded in the United States when they communicated with foreign sources.
These measures put in place by President Bush was originally put in place to monitor only a thousand to five hundred individuals supposedly linked to
Al–Qaeda. Unfortunately other aspects of the Program were aimed not just at targeted individuals, but also millions of Americans who have nothing to
hid. All of this was happening with out the consent or knowledge of United States citizens. This was until Edward Snowden, an young contractor with
the NSA, revealed the true extent of the NSA's

Personal Privacy In Big Brother
Imagine a world in which every facet of your life was monitored by the government. A world where a camera sat in every hallway, every street
corner, and every bedroom. A world where nothing was kept private, not even one's own thoughts. This world exists within the pages of George
Orwell's 1984. In the dystopian setting of Oceania, the totalitarian authority of "Big Brother" keeps a watchful eye on its population as well as
employing various methods to keep them in line. Although it is rare for this type of government system to exist in the modern world, there are notable
similarities to be explored. Can such extreme violations of privacy exist within the borders of the united states? Should people be willing to give
aspects of their personal privacy for the greater good of society? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, it's not so much a matter of "is" but more so a matter of "how". To answer THAT question, one could look to Jeff Tyson's web article, "How
Carnivore Worked". According to Tyson, Carnivore was: "The third generation of online
–detection software used by the F.B.I.[...]as a 'Packet Sniffer'."
(Tyson, 81). What this software essentially did was monitor all of the traffic being sent over the Internet. What makes Carnivore a true invasion of
privacy is its lack of restriction, meaning EVERYTHING (including, but not limited to, private Emails, account passwords, and online shopping
transactions) is all watched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The goal of Carnivore, as stated by Tyson was to: "Give the agency access to the
online activities of suspected criminals" (Tyson, 81). Although most would consider this software to be an invasion of privacy, due to the nature in
which it was being used, we must ask the question "Can we compromise our privacy for the greater good?" which leads us to the next

Privacy of Digitized Personal Information Essay example
Privacy of Digitized Personal Information
Privacy of personal information is a fundamental right of any person. No one wants his/her private details to be known to other people, especially
ones who they are not familiar with. However, human society is based on cooperation between people. Society simply cannot function without this
vital interaction between two human beings. No one is that capable or skillful enough to fulfill his/her daily requirements alone. The very fabric of
society exists because a person has to depend on other people to get things done.
Whenever one person talks to another, he/she unknowingly reveals a certain amount of personal information such as physical features, personality,
character, etc. It is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, the Internet is also the main medium of violation of people's privacy. In North America alone, 216 million users use the Internet. The
Internet is the ultimate communication network. On the flip side, it is also the most controversial and debated topic all over the world today.
Identifying contemporary privacy issues
Internet Search Engines: Search engines such as Google are the most popular search engines utilized by Internet users. The topic to be deliberated
on is that just because I place some personal information on my website, should everyone in the whole wide world be allowed to see it? The search
engines use advanced searching algorithms to retrieve all possible relevant information based on just a few keywords entered as the search parameters.
They are capable of displaying phone numbers, residential addresses, Email ids and even pictures of a person just by entering his/her name. Isn't this
considered, to a certain extent, a violation of privacy? Does this mean that I should not place any personal information on the Internet? And what is
stopping miscreants from misusing this information, for example, for identity theft or stalking? The only solution is to protect this information by
firewalls, encryption or by password protected access.
Financial and Credit information: A credit report is the de facto standard of evaluating a person's standing in society and is used by all financial
institutions. Banks,

Should The Government Surveillance Systems Affect Personal...
According to "A Surveillance Society" by William E. Thompson and Joseph V. Hickey, cameras are becoming more common to people nowadays.
They are everywhere – in almost all government and corporate offices, and many social and public places like malls and stores. Britain has been the
most active in this trend; putting cameras in some "trouble spots" for public safety. Additionally, since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States has
been trying to catch up. The government then passed the USA PATRIOT Actwhich expanded its authority to "spy" on private citizens. Furthermore, the
new surveillance systems became more advance; it can not only scan places, but also analyze the scene, thus, it can now record, store, and index
images. High–tech surveillance devices are growing in number and use across urban places – to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Discussions were formed about how much personal privacy people were willing to give for the promise of safety from terrorists. However, surveillance
devices such as high quality cameras and mobile devices are also available to the public and can be easily ordered from retailers – this could
potentially make everyone part of the security system. According to sociologist David Lyon, new surveillance systems have become a major social
institution that affects social relationships, people's identities, personal space, freedom, and dignity. Data images are considered as the "looking glass"
that provides social judgements about "who we are". Finally, despite of increasing identity theft, spying, selling of personal information, and other
technological invasion many people see the benefits of surveillance outweighing the risks. Although it is unequally distributed, new surveillance, in
fact, both have its positive and negative

Personal Privacy in the Information Age
Professor Kiehn English 302 3 October 2013 Personal Privacy in the Information Age Some of the most contentious and recurrent argumentative
dialogues regarding civil liberties stem from what seems at face value, like a relatively elementary idea the notion of personal privacy. This debate
could never be more relevant than in present day society, where globalization and advanced communications technologies have synergized to form a
ubiquitous digital library of shared information. The specific example of the delicate balance between personal privacy and national security here in the
United States has only further convoluted the issue the debate of whether and to what caliber citizens have privacy rights is hotly contested. As
technology ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Approximately 6 in 10 individuals disapproved of the governments collection of U.S. citizens phone records however around 75 of those polled agreed
it was admissible to track the phone records of citizens suspected of terrorist activity. In a poll conducted in April, shortly after the Boston Marathon
bombings, results showed only 20 of individuals believed the government had exceeded the balance of intrusion and privacy, with 26 saying they hadnt
done enough to maintain national security, and approximately 44 saying their was an adequate balance. Furthermore, approximately 6 in 10 individuals
were not particularly concerned with government collection of their phone records and internet monitoring, with the other 4 being somewhat or very
concerned (Kopicki). The results from these polls suggest American opinion on the matter is correlated more to occurrence of perceived terrorist
threats, less so than concerns of personal privacy there is a new attitudinal awareness, and perhaps reluctant acceptance, of the omnipresence of
electronic surveillance. Claiming an inherent right to privacy regarding electronic communications through constitutional evidence necessitates
examination of the legalese regarding such issues. There is no actual constitutional amendment that is dedicated to specifically protecting citizens
information privacy rights regarding electronic media, with the Fourth

Privacy Versus Security: Personal Data and Internet Use,...
Privacy versus Security: Personal Data & Internet Use There are many Americans who are perplexed by the very topic of Internet Privacy as well as
the security of their personal data. While the topics, privacy and security are clearly defined by Merriam–Webster's Dictionary as two different things,
they possess the ability to work together while one does not encroach upon the other. While these are two different topics, there are some that make the
mistake of using these terms interchangeably. There is a way to maintain not being observed while remaining secure. Some fear that the mere use of the
Internet is funneling their information to some huge database recording personal activity along with personal information. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The 3rd party company validates the user as either the cardholder or not without accessing any additional or identifying information. This type of
process enforces security to the user while at the same time maintaining their privacy. As many stories fill the news of databases being compromised or
government laptops being lost or stolen, the "Shibboleth" project will win many supporters. However, even with privacy being protected and security
being enforced, it is up to the consumer to be vigilant regarding their personal information in the same way. Many internet users fill the web–sphere
with personal information from Facebook to LinkedIn. These networks (professional and social) encourage users to divulge information about
themselves that may end up being dangerous, especially for our youth. There have been stories of people killed or hurt because they posted a
specific status on their Facebook page. This can be simply taken care of by using the tools already resident on the site (privacy tools). There are
various ways in which personal data and Internet privacy can be maintained while keeping national security in top working order. There are various
sources that allowing this to be the case more than the theory on an individual user level, without packages such as the "Shibboleth" software
application. Utilizing the firewall in your Windows or Mac operating system is an excellent method of

Is Privacy Overrated By David Schinke's Personal Privacy?
Private privacy is personal information that people keep secret from public; it also means to refrain people from knowing about them or their
situations. Many companies and businesses wants to protect people from hackers and thieves from using their information, such as Social Security and
credit card barcodes; consequently, hackers use people's information to buy illegal products or to expose explicit information from their social media
pages to the public. Other suggested that personal privacy does not exist when the government is watching people, stopping terrorists and criminals
from plotting attacks against their communities. David Plotz, a writer and deputy editor of Slate, wrote an essay entitled "Privacy is Overrated" to talk
about ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They both encourage people to talk about this matter in order to gain the insight from these essays. However, the question is about which paper made a
convincing argument about personal privacy. The essay who made a convincing argument is the one that understands people's struggle about personal
privacy; he designs his essay with real–life scenarios to exemplify the meaning of personal privacy. Then, he uses these scenarios to speak his
message. Finally, he leaves the readers with a breathtaking conclusion to relieve their anxieties. David Plotz used his own life to persuade the
audience that personal privacy is an individual problem where no one cares for one another. In contrast, David Schinke used two different scenarios
and people's quotes in order convince that too much dependency on social media will cause people to invade their own privacy; in other words,
people put themselves at risk if they expose what they did or who they are online. Based on the information given from the essays and the stylish
appeals they used to share the message, David Plotz's essay makes a better convincing argument about personal privacy; his message may have stern
criticism about people's remarks on personal privacy, but he concludes a moral message to help people to think about others rather than to live as

The Value Of Personal Privacy
The value of personal privacy in American society is something that seems to dwindle every day. We have access to wonderful technologies such as
personal assistants, social media, and much more; however, most of these great items empirically come at the expense of one's privacy. As a simple
example, Eric Boughman, a contributor for the Forbes Legal Council, wrote an article stating that while the Amazon Echo is an amazingly practical
device, it is always listening to conversations and may even be storing them in the cloud. (Council, 1) Boughman analyzed Amazon's privacy policy,
finding that Amazon does indeed store voice recordings and other personal information on a cloud server, and while this data is able to be deleted,
Amazon does not recommend deleting it, as doing so may "degrade the experience". Personal assistants are far from the only case of privacy being
infringed due to technology, and we believe that this is a major issue. The tech industry will continue to pump out devices which close the gap
between the virtual and physical worlds, and as they continue to do this, the value of our personal privacy will continue to take a toll. It is for this
reason that we will provide the foundation for a new privacy law to be enacted in America, allowing Americans to submit requests to have their
personal data removed from a server when they feel it has been misused.
The adoption of this new law may help eliminate the potential for individual data abuse in the short term,

Airport Body Scanners and Personal Privacy Essay
Airport Body Scanners and Personal Privacy Believe it or not, there was a time when passengers showed up an hour before their flights and walked
directly to their assigned gates without taking off their shoes at a security screening station or throwing away their bottles of water. There was even a
time when friends and family met passengers at the gate and watch their flights take off or land without having a ticket or identification...and that was
only ten years ago. Air travel safety precautions changed dramatically after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that targeted passenger planes in
the United States and killed well over 1,000 people. Precautions continue to evolve as new threats are detected and passengers are now concerned...
In 2009, a man on a flight from the Netherlands to Detroit attempted to blow up a plane with explosives in his underwear. Although the body scanners
were in the United States at the time, they were not in the Netherlands. Passengers argue that no matter how many security measures are put in place,
terrorists will find a new and innovative way to cause destruction. They claim that the only guarantee the body scanners can make is violation of privacy
for innocent people. Privacy issues often become a heated debate in a country like the United States of America, which was founded on the basic
principle of freedom. Passengers are outraged that officials are viewing nude images of their bodies. They are rebelling against intrusive pat–downs
and demanding better solutions. The TSA takes all of these concerns under consideration and has made admirable efforts to ensure privacy, as well as
to clarify points used in arguments against the new screenings.
For example, the TSA has established strict guidelines regarding the images received by the body scanners. Images of women are only viewed by
female agents and images of men are only viewed by male agents. The agents viewing the images are in a separate, secure room and never see the
passengers they are viewing on screen. According to TSA's privacy policy, "The two officers communicate via wireless

The Use Of Personal Privacy On The Internet
Additionally, young adolescents' personal information disclosure social websites such as My Space has increased worries of their parent's parents'
worries as regards to the loss of privacy (Romer 2006; Lenhart and Madden 2007; Livingstone 2008). Privacy may often harm the well–being of users,
especially young. The use of personal privacy can result on affect users' behavior such as the trend of "sexting" among teenagers(Betts, 2009) and
cyberbullying (Reed, 2009). Privacy concerns on technologies. Online social networks have become a significant part that people cannot live without in
the 21 century. Statistics show that about 82% online population use at least one social networks such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, and LinkedIn that
facilities their relationship–building and services with others (Aquino, 2012). These technology and information society changes people's lives in
many aspects and the rise of privacy concerns among users of social media platforms. Take Facebook as an example of social networking, based on
statistics from Facebook, "Facebook has more than 350 million active users. Fifty percent of these users log in daily (2010)."
In United States, Facebook accounts for 7% of the total consuming time online (Lipsman, 2010) which shows that the increased amount of time spent
on social media increased concerns about their users' privacy and personal data that might have potential impact of personal information leakage and
social relations with others (Li,

Personal Privacy Case Study
Is the government supposed to protect our privacy or invade it? The FBI has had many cases where they were given information from an individual's
cell phone and they got a warrant to search the phone. It seems so simple until it is brought to the attention of the cell phone company that access to
this one person's phone will open the possibility that the security of other user's privacy could be in question. Apple users agree to be loyal customers as
long as their personal information is kept as private as possible. Everyone knows that the government already monitors everything, and everything done
online is out there forever. The only harm Apple did in this situation was hurt the FBI's feelings. They thought that they were entitled to everything...
One reason is that Apple users would lose trust in the company. Randall Holcombe made point of this by stating, "The Fourth Amendment
guarantees people this right to privacy. Individuals have the right to possess information without having to share it with the government. And
Apple has the right to provide products that help individuals to protect this right." Of all people, the governments should know about the fourth
amendment's protection of the people. By providing products to people that help protect their rights, Apple was giving them someone they could
trust. Why would they want to lose that? Even more compelling is Holcombe's point that "Regardless of whether the software the FBI wanted
Apple to create would create problems for phone owners, forcing Apple to create such software would have violated the rights of the company and
its stakeholders." This is proof that the FBI is crossing the line. Apple does not have to give the FBI anything or do anything for the FBI and they
know it. To add even more fuel to the fire , Holcombe states that "War powers in effect during the two World Wars gave the president substantial
power to force corporations to redirect their resources toward producing output to aid the war effort, Those war powers were repealed after the wars
ended. The FBI wanted to claim similar powers during normal times without an act of Congress." This is important because we have been through
something similar to this before. This also shows that the FBI is willing to do whatever it takes to get what they want even if it means crossing the
line. While some parts of the government and the law stand to uphold everything they worked so hard it is evident that the FBI will even color outside
the lines to get what they want. The FBI has gone against exactly what it is supposed to

Online Data Collection and Personal Privacy-a Review of...
Introduction
The growth of the internet enters into marketing world (KД±mД±loДџlu, 2004). The internet is used as another marketing tool in several purposes; a
cost–effective advertising channel (Eri, Islam and Daud, 2011), a resource for customers' personal data obtaining (Pope and Lowen, 2009), and a
market place (Lwin, Wirtz and Williams, 2007). Apart from those rising benefits, there are also problems and ethical issues growing aside.Privacy
seems to be the biggest issue that marketers have to deal with the growth marketing use of the internet (Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003; Miyazaki,
2008). Many researches found that privacy could have effects on trust, loyalty, and attitude on customers toward companies doing business on the...
3.Collecting
2
personal data to create information with intention of selling it; this approach of data collecting tends to be the most invasive to personal privacy
perspectives.
Miyazaki (2008) states that the invasion of personal privacy of data collecting occurs when it is combined by two perspectives; tracking data and
information of customers (KД±mД±loДџlu, 2004), and the lack of information about how data is collected or is used and ability to control. The latter
seems to be a huge problem issue and privacy invasion (Dommeyer and Gross, 2003; Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003; Dubelaar, Jevons and Parker,
2003; Christiansen, 2011). There are many undisclosed circumstances of using personal information that threat customers' privacy for example price
adjusting and shopping pattern tracking. Insurance companies measure individual's risk of injury and death based on personal information of the
internet searches and blogs, then accordingly adjust one's insurance price (Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003; Christiansen, 2011). Providing a club card to
use in supermarkets for customers to collect points allows supermarkets to track consumers' shopping patterns (Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003).
As the increase of data collection and media reports of its affect (Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003; Ha, 2004), privacy concern increases on customers
(Pitta, Franzak and Laric, 2003; Ha, 2004; Spake, Finney and Joseph, 2011; Bernard, 2011). This is the

Personal Privacy Up For Grabs Analysis
Encrypted For Easy Access
C. Mitchell Shaw wrote an article called "Personal Privacy Up for Grabs." The article talks about privacy and liberty being closely related. The
government wants to have unlimited access to all digital data or information in the country and this brings into question issues of what is reasonable.
This discussion goes through topics, such as, surveillance, encryption, and corporations that provide the public with encrypted devices to protect their
information. We want to share with anyone, but our private pictures, such as family pictures and those sweet text messages for our husbands and wives
we want to keep to ourselves as cherished memories, and while most of us have nothing to hide from the government, we do ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Privacy is mainly about trying to improve your social and business opportunities by concealing the sorts of bad activities that would cause other
people not to want to deal with you" (qtd in Shaw 23). The general population really has nothing to hide from the government. According to the
government, if that is the case, then the public has nothing to fear and should relinquish all rights to privacy. While in theory, that would be a grand
solution, but Americans still want to feel as if they have a choice who sees their information and what particular information is shared. Corporations,
such as Microsoft, Apple, and Facebook, use our browser history and internet search patterns to solicit us and recommend things that we may be
interested in. We still feel that we have privacy, since these companies provide us with encrypted devices, however they themselves invade our privacy
and use our information for data mining purposes. This can be compared to "digital Stockholm syndrome" (27). Consumers do not give a second
thought to the price and overlook the invasion in their privacy to get the latest and greatest

The Importance Of Personal Privacy
aimed at protecting their citizenry. The United States has not been left behind in the stampede to adopt such measures. One of the proposals which
have been put forward as far as a means of safeguarding and protecting Americans is to allow the government, through its various security agencies, to
collect data and have access to the American people's mobile phones, social media accounts, and even emails.
Unsurprisingly, this proposal has generated a heated debate among the American public. While some Americans do not feel anything wrong with such
government surveillance especially since it is for public safety, others are nonetheless unconvinced that such an action is right. This latter group views
any form of government surveillance on American people as a violation of their individual privacy.
On a personal level, I believe that my privacy is more important to me and therefore I choose the side which advocates of individual privacy as
opposed to public safety. In the successive paragraphs, I will therefore provide reasons why I feel that my privacy should take precedence over the
government's need to access personal data.
a) Individual Privacy is protected by the Constitution.
The US Constitution protects the right to individual privacy under Amendment IV by guaranteeing the right of every person "to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures..." (Redlich, Attanasio, & Goldstein, 2004). I therefore believe that by

Online Privacy : Personal Information And Access Essay
Online Privacy: Personal information and Access We all go the Internet for some reason, either Google to search, YouTube to watch videos, or to
complete assignments. Getting on the Internet in general is not private. We share our locations, personal information, social media, and website history
on the web. If we choose to get online, we are taking a risk against all scammers online. Currently, we cannot get on certain websites without signing up
with an email to view more information. The government most definitely should protect us better when it comes to the internet and our privacy because
most of the United States uses it and fraud is important in America so we need help keeping everything private. Jim Harper stated, "When we use
the Internet, we have to share information about ourselves, just like we do when we go outside." We let our neighbors know we are still present.
Social Media plays a big apart in the society today. Facebook is the know social network everyone uses. Once, you sign up you are giving up personal
information such as birthday, education, relations to other people, information about yourself–hobbies, favorite music, movies, books, where your
check–in at. People use Facebook for sharing important events with others so they can stay up–to–date in one individuals' life. As well express their
feelings to the world about what is currently happening. Instead of people keeping things to themselves people love to share information to

Safeguarding Personal Privacy
America today rivals George Orwell's 1984 society through the National Security Agency's global surveillance programs such as Prism, XKeyscore,
and Dishfire. Surveillance programs, led by the NSA, are all used to clandestinely collect electronic data from all internet and phone users throughout
the world. These programs came about after the Patriot Act of 2001. This act was put in place to help protect the American people from terrorist
groups after the atrocities seen on 9/11. Originally drafted to protect the people, the Patriot Act was soon taken advantage of by the NSA. These
programs should be heavily restricted because they disregard personal privacy, do not properly protect the information they are taking, and, lastly, are
unconstitutional. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In theory, the government can detect warning signs from certain individuals before it is too late and the damage is done. However, what are the
American people trading for this security? Is this loss of privacy and freedom worth it? To quote one of the greatest American founding fathers,
Benjamin Franklin, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." In
Conclusion, clandestine surveillance programs run by the United States government are Orwellian in nature and are becoming out of hand The NSA's
Prism, XKeyscore, and Dishfire programs should be extremely regulated because they overstep the boundaries or personal privacy, do not adequately
protect the data they obtain, and impede on the basic rights given to Americans in the

Personal Privacy: Why Apple Should Not Help The FBI
Privacy is something that us as Americans value very much. It is a privilege that many countries do not get to have. When purchasing a phone, we
usually try to find one with high security to ensure that our personal information will not go anywhere, except for where we put it. Right now, Apple
must choose between staying true to their privacy policy, or help the FBI hack into the terrorist's iPhone, and risk other countries blackmailing Apple
for the software. I think that Apple should not help the FBI by making the software because everyone has their own personal privacy, and if Apple had
a way to compromise that, it is out there forever. All technology companies have the possibility to be hacked, and if someone has the capabilities to hack

National Security Vs. Personal Privacy
The topic of national security vs. personal privacy, in recent events, has been very controversial regarding which is more appropriate. On one hand, the
government can search through personal, private files without any consent from the owner, thus making the information no longer private. The
opposing side argues that the government is invading personal privacy of innocent civilians, violating the Fourth Amendment Rights to prohibit
unreasonable searches and seizures. Both have valid points, both positive and negative; however, the invasion of personal privacy by the law is only
justified in a dire, life or death situation. The government should not have the ability to view private information in an everyday situation because it is
a strong violation of the Fourth Amendment, it is too invasive, and it bypasses the limits of personal privacy when necessary. Therefore, the
government should not be able to view personal, private information of civilians unless absolutely necessary. One undeniable right that all Americans
possess is the right to prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures, and by accessing civilian's personal digital documents, the Government is violating
that right. When it comes down to a debate between personal privacy and national security, the Government chooses to undermine the constitutional
standards through overly invasive surveillance of civilian's personal documents (Paul/Yoho paragraph 4). This statement hereby implies that the
government is

The Government And The People 's Personal Privacy
For the past few decades, the relationship between the government and the people's personal privacy has been a widely controversial topic in the
United States. According to the Merriam–Webster online dictionary, privacy is the state of being away from the public's attention. The right to
privacy is becoming increasingly harder for individuals to keep hold of, and a primary cause of this is the widening of the scope of the government for
the sake of national security. For over a decade, there has been ethical abuse by the United States government which costs the taxpayers money and
threatens the future privacy of the people. Ever since the tragic attacks on the country in September of 2001, the government, under the pretense of
preserving national security and preventing future terrorist attacks, has been passing ill–defined legislation and launching undisclosed programs which
overstep constitutional boundaries and impede on citizens' rights. These initiatives place a burden on the government's budget and employ funds which
could serve a better purpose if invested into more justifiable causes. The issue of government interference will only progress as technological
advancements over time make the illegal tracking, surveillance, and obtainment of private information more effective and efficient. The United States
government must take a step back, halt illegal and unconstitutional programs, and seek congressional approval before making any future decisions
which affect

Personal Privacy In America
America is an individualized society, where personal privacy is valued. Current exposure is increasing, however, due to technological factors. Those
factors include social networking, YouTube, Twitter, and other forms of mass expression. The effects of this increased exposure can range from
embarrassment to risks to personal safety on one hand to greater exposure to other cultures and a better understanding of the lives of others.
History of societal views on privacy
Privacy has only recently become a value in Americans' daily lives. Early in America's history, privacy was not considered, since members of the
community would share a living space with many families. In this setting, activities were done in the open, and a lack of privacy was considered
normal. As time went on, and cultural norms changed, individuals wanted more personal freedom from the judgment of others in their community in
their actions and the ability to keep information about themselves private. Privacy was the basis of several amendments in the Bill of Rights, outlining
that citizens should have a "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,".
This does not explicitly state privacy rights, but it provides protections from invasions of privacy by the government without due cause, allowing
people to have a common sense of security of their private information. These protections enabled citizens to have rights to have a protected personal
space and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
[2] Since then there have been occurrences involving governmental agencies, software applications, and social media information gathering about
personal information without consent. Privacy is still a new concept for Americans and will continue to evolve with technology, as well as other
aspects of

Effects Of Advertising On Personal Privacy And Security
Effects of Advertising on Personal Privacy and Security: Persuasive Essay As the world wide web continues to become more prevalent in everyday
tasks and the internet continues to evolve, so does the world of advertising. Everyone encounters some form of advertising daily, with the most
common being internet advertising. According to Patricia Garner, "internet advertising is by far the fastest–growing medium." She continues by stating
"improved advertising formats make Internet display more interactive and effective, with consumers more likely to view, remember, and interact with
them than older formats like TV, radio, and print media. Also, technological advancements in media buying space are helping advertisers to reach the
target ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In theory, the consumer can control a portion of what data is collected and used, however they first need to recognize that many times consent is given
for these practices just by using a service. While I can acknowledge that certain data that is stored can be beneficial in the way of simpler web
searches, customized results on entertainment platforms such as YouTube, and easier use of some applications, I do not believe that the amount of data
being harvested and stored for benefit outweighs the risks. I believe that consumers would rather spend an extra ten seconds to finish typing a sentence
with peace of mind knowing that a vast amount of personal information about them is not being collected and stored, by Google. Another significant
factor in user privacy is that users often agree, sometimes unknowingly, to allow their information to be shared with third parties. Evans explains "a
consumer may feel differently about providing search data associated with her IP address to a search engine provider if she knew the search engine
provider would sell the data to another vendor that had figured out a way to associate her IP with her personal information" (Evans, 32). A consumer
may agree to this practice unintentionally, and it occurs across multiple platforms, including social media.

How The Internet Has Impacted Personal Privacy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Mia Malone

More from Mia Malone (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How The Internet Has Impacted Personal Privacy