2. Overview
• Research study
• Paradigms &
Methodology
• Mapping the journeys
• Eco-social ID & training
• Shared Space encounters
• Connector role
3. Practitioner experiences of Forest School
Qualitative ethnographic case studies over 2 years.
Questioning how the practitioners experience...
the impact
of training?
internal
and external
influences on
role?
and adapt
in response to
experiences?
5. Participants
8 practitioners:
• 3 in nurseries (EYPs)
• 2 in primary schools (TA & student vol)
• 1 in env ed centre (ed manager)
• 1 in home ed (parent vol)
• 1 in play work (LA service manager)
6. FS Principles in brief
• long-term process
• natural wooded environment
• relationship with the natural world
• holistic development
• supported risks
• professional practice
• learner-centred & play processes
7. Mapping the journeys
the challenge of
representing the non-
representational...
subjective experience
fleeting relational affects
deconstruct to reconstruct
decide to divide & border
new patterns emerge
8. Ant’s journey
FS
training
re-connects
outdoors
seeking new
experiences
passionindoor childhood tech generation pedagogy
crossroads!
choose both
travel
woodwork
hope, surprise,
affirmation
dystopic
sadness
fears wishy
washy
theory
odd one out
FS
placement
ideals
compromised,
critical questions
integration:
study to
transform
system
retreats
gives up on
coursework
included
only
male
9.
10. fear & loss...
of time, space,
childhood,
opportunity,
nature, the
future ...
generational
change
professional
purpose
affective choices to train
personal
mission
‘contagious
attitude’
Chawla, 2006)early
experience
22. SS planning model
An interesting comparison
!
An attempt to change
participant agency by
changing the structure.
!
Challenges: If not
everyone acts equally,
chaos can ensue! ‘reconciling people, places and
transport’ (Hamilton-Baillie, 2001)
23. Connector role
before
after
adult-
to-adult
interaction
adult taking
child to env
‘It’s a
constant battle’
‘on the same
wavelength’
‘just being still and silent’
‘let go, let them be’
‘I subvert my
status to play’
‘conscious choices’
in dis/connections
with mainstream
‘attracted to
getting distracted’
impact
impact
‘practical
AND affective
skills’
26. FS in collaboration
• role in connection to others in setting
• shared access to resources and sites
• skill sharing
• contribute to creating best practice
• local economy & local networks of
social solidarity
• national collective voice & advocacy
28. Forest School Light
• compromised practice: tokenistic, isolated
• values in conflict - at odds with setting
• reduced length, choice, biodiversity, risk, play
• pragmatic choices: ‘a way in’
• ‘we can’t afford the full version’
• ‘we don’t have enough time’
• ‘we can’t go to the woods’
• ‘we need activities, we can’t just play’
29. Whole FS
• ‘Full fat’ or ‘whole grain’
• supportive conditions
• FS Principles: all elements in place
• values reflected in action
• whole team: connected to setting
• transformative potential
• culture change
30. Practitioner implications
•A wider situated role
•Practitioner support; finding help & allies
•Solo training can contribute to isolation in team
•Critical reflection, to explore self and nurture resilience
•Whole team approach: shared space, shared agency
•Whole FS or FS Light? Destructive potential of tokenism.
31. Overview
• Research study
• Paradigms & Methodology
• Mapping the journeys
• Eco-social ID & training
• Shared Space encounters
• Connector role
• Implications
33. References
!
• Hamilton-Baillie (2001) Home Zones: Reconciling People, Places
and Transport. Published by Harvard University, Graduate School
of Design. Loeb Fellowship.
• Rackham, O (1990) (2nd edn) Trees and Woodlands in the British
Landscape. London: Butler and Tanner.