Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community

Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community
Watergate
Glenn L. Venner
Cincinnati State Community College.
After the November shooting of president Kennedy, the nation and the world mourned. While we
mourned another part of our country was raising up for right and the south would be flung into a
racial war. the war in Vietnam would be a lost cause and an embarrassment for LBJ. It would all end
with the embarrassment and the trust lost in our politicians and our president. This will come to
haunt us even today and be known as the Watergate scandal.
On the morning of June 17, 1972, several men were arrested in connection with the burglary inside
the office of the Democratic National Committee located near the Watergate building in Washington,
D.C. The robbery was in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The FBI and the American public need to know just what had happened and that this may not have
been just a typical break–in but a cover up to protect someone. And if so was it an abuse of
presidential power and a deliberate obstruction of justice. Meanwhile, at the same time seven
conspirators were indicted on charges related to the Watergate building break–in. At the instruction
of the President's aides, five pleaded guilty to the charges and avoided trial; while White House
counsel John Dean, testified before a grand jury about the president's crimes. The other two were
convicted in January 1973 for the break–in. By this time, a number of people including Washington
Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, and trial judge John J. Sirica and members of a
Senate investigating committee had begun to think that something bigger was going to break soon.
The break though came when they found out that the President had secretly taped every
conversation that took place in the Oval Office. If the investigating committee could get those tapes,
they would have proof of the president's guilt. Nixon worked very hard to keep those tapes away
from anyone his legal staff advised him that he did not have to hand them over that he had executive
privilege to protect them and to not give them to anyone. However, Senate committee and the
independent special prosecutor Archibald Cox
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Was Bill Clinton Impeachment Justified
For this assignment I chose Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was impeached on two charges: lying under
oath and obstruction of justice. Mr. Clinton lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky,
but that was not the grounds for impeachment. So, was Bill Clinton's impeachment justified? No.
There cannot have been an obstruction of justice if the per suite of truth in this case was not itself a
just pursuit. You were lied to, yes by the President, who had an understandable and very personal
reason to lie. Even if that was enough to condemn the dude in guilt, the great and terrible thing
about justice in America is that it is not administered by robots; justice without mercy is cruelty.
Without considering the context of Clinton's lie, without

A Comparison Of Justice In Bohemia And A Scandal In Belgravia
Examine how the crime fiction texts "A Scandal in Bohemia" and "A Scandal in Belgravia"
privilege the dominate values of society and appeal to the audiences sense of justice.
The crime fiction texts "A scandal in Bohemia" and "A scandal in Belgravia" explore the historical
and cultural position of dominant social values and beliefs in society, shaped by the culture and time
of which the texts were written. The audience is invited to consider the ways in which the privileged
ideological assumptions which inform our reading, are important to the meaning we make from the
text through the dominant social values at the time. The way in which the texts represents people,
expectations and behaviours provides the audience with a social commentary in which values are
communicated, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The way in which these dominant values of society are privileged by the texts via their characters
and plot, appeal to the audience's sense of justice through the issues it raises. The issues, including
the obstruction of justice and good vs. evil, lead to appearances of crime and presents the audience
with common features associated with crime fiction, including characters (detectives, suspects) and
red herrings. This appeals to one's sense of justice, thus questioning the audiences view on
preventing crime and their opinion on the pursuit/obstruction of justice through the appearance of
the privileged social values in association with common features of crime fiction.
The idea that patriarchal power places women in an inferior position, particularly in patriarchal
societies and function to maintain the dominant social order, is a value closely followed and in some
ways challenged in "A Scandal in Bohemia" and "A Scandal in Belgravia". Traditionally women
were perceived as being the physically and intellectually weaker sex and in all ways subordinate to
men – a dominant value known to the Victorian

Kwame Kilpatrick Research Paper
Oxana Kane
Kwame Kilpatrick Crimes and Punishment.
Kwame Kilpatrick was elected Mayor of Detroit at the age of 31 which made him the youngest
person holding the position in the history of the city. Kwame was a charismatic, intelligent, savvy
and ambitious young man with great potential and future ahead of him. During the inauguration
ceremony he was singing on the stage, "Together we stand, divided we fall; let's build a bridge, tear
down the wall" [1]. Instead Kilpatrick tore down the entire city. He stole from the citizens he voted
for and used his position to make money illegally. Extortion, fraud, bribery, conspiracy are among
the crimes that involve 32 more people besides Kilpatrick himself. [2] In 2008 Kilpatrick resigned
and was charged ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The biggest factor in the settlement was the evidence against Kilpatrick and his former Chieft of
Staff, Chistine Beatty, obtained by the officer's lawyer, Mike Stefani. He subpoena the phone and
text messaging records from Skytel. The messages detailed their sexual relationship, indicated of
Mayor misappropriating funds and arranging expense romantic getaways with Beatty. The evidence
contradicted testimony that both Kilpatrick and Beatty gave at trial regarding the intimate
relationship and ouster of Brown. [9] Under the Michigan Freedom of Information Act the Detroit
Free press requested a release of all the settlement–related documents in 2008. This led to the
criminal charges against Kwame Kilpatric and Christine Beatty. In March 2008 they were charged
with misconduct in the office, conspiracy, obstruction of justice and perjury.[10]. Misconduct in
office is a commission of an unlawful act within the official capacity. It carries a maximum sentence
of life imprisonment for the public office employees/ Conspiracy is the agreement between two or
more people to commit a crime. Obstruction of justice may be an attempt to hide and not disclose an
importance piece of evidence (discovery), apprehension or punishment of somebody who committed
a crime. It sometimes includes bribery, murder or physical harm to the key witness. Oftentimes,
obstruction of justice and perjury go hand in hand, as perjury is providing false information under

Donald Trump Persuasive Essay
Does President Donald J. Trump deserve to be impeached after his first year in office? To answer the
previous question first contemplate over what is a president and what makes a good one? According
to Merriam–Webster, a president is "the chief officer of an organization usually entrusted with the
direction and administration of its policies. (pg.1)" An adequate president is a person that can build a
team, create culture, discipline, discipline others, and that knows how to organize. The current
president was born on June 14, 1946, in Queens, New York. Previously, Trump was a real estate
mogul, entrepreneur, and billionaire and does not have any experience in the political field. Being or
becoming a businessman would take a various amount of leadership and social skills, but how does
Donald Trump remain the president today with all the ruthless offenses and lack of experience? This
candidate would not be qualified as a good president due to his reckless determinations, upsurges
and he simply does not meet the requirements.
The article Scholars and Writers for American would disagree with my statements by agreeing that
President Donald Trump should not be impeached after his first year in office. From their
perspective, they have given five appropriate reasons to why they are on President Trump's side. The
first reason is the corruption in government. According to Scholars and Writers for America Donald
Trump promised a proposal, "...for regulatory reform and for ending the

Mill's Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a theory in standardizing ethics holding that the best moral action is the one that
maximizes utility. According to Mill, a lot of people misunderstand utilitarianism by thinking that
utility is an obstruction to pleasure. Utility, also known as the Greatest Happiness Principle, is
actually defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This principle is described as "actions are
right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of
happiness."
Mill develops an account of rights at the end of his book Utilitarianism. He begins by coming up
with things that are commonly categorized as just or unjust. First, it is unjust to deprive someone of
their legal right. Second, it

Racial Profiling Of Michael Brown: Obstruction Of The...
After the horrendous shooting of Michael Brown by an officer in Ferguson, Missouri a petition was
sent to the White House that looks into equipping officers with body cameras on the line of duty.
Since the Michael Brown petition exceeded a hundred thousand signatures the Obama
administration was obligated to respond to the social issue ("#BlackLifesMatter" 1). By observing
officers' encounters with citizens, we'll be able to determine objective evidence of a situation.
Mistreating, framing, or racial profiling towards individuals who are of different descent is an
obstruction of justice. The proposal has rapidly gained popularity through social media, but the topic
is more complex and complicated than society realizes. Many Individuals are

Organizational Structure Of Arthur Andersen
Company Background:
Arthur Anderson Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) was established in 1913 into the Accounting
industry. They offered tax, consulting, and, auditing services to large corporations everywhere. Their
headquarters were located in Chicago, Illinois and eventually had over 85,000 employees in 84
different countries (Collins, 2016). By the 1990's Arthur Andersen had become one of the largest
accounting firms, and was recognized as one of the "big five." Along with being one of the largest
accounting firms Arthur Andersen was also one of the most reputable. There were many factors that
distinguished Arthur Andersen from other accounting firms, and the most notable were the honesty
and integrity Arthur Andersen had established for the company (Moore & Crampton, 2000).
Andersen set high standards which in turn resulted in the growth of their prestige. Many companies
came to Arthur Andersen because of the trust it had established in the public and in the accounting
Industry. One of the ways Arthur Andersen established their reputation was through their
organizational structure and the culture of the company.
Arthur Andersen followed a centralized management structure, a structure that follows one central
line of command, and promised the firm would speak as one voice and as one firm. This would
remain true no matter how large the company became. The company adopted this as its culture, and
employees followed, given that Andersen was very selective when hiring

Examples Of Allegory In Animal Farm By George Orwell
The book Animal Farm, written by George Orwell, is an allegory to the Russian revolution.
Meaning that events in the book correlate to an event during the Russian Revolution. All of the
characters are a representation of a historical figure. Napoleon represents Joseph Stalin, Old major is
Karl Marx, and Squealer is the Pravda. The character Farmer Jones represents the historical figure
Tsar Nicholas II, but is also similar to the modern figure .
Farmer Jones owns Manor Farm, he is a lazy alcoholic. He doesn't treat the animals with respect,
and they get tired of it. In the book the animals finally rebel when Mr. Jones fails to feed them all
day, because he was drunk a a bar. He is run off the farm by the animals. Later in to book, Farmer
Jones

Sanctuary Cities
A Sanctuary city is a city that does not permit municipal funds or resources to be applied in
furtherance of enforcement of federal immigration. However, Sanctuary cities are not and should not
be a practice within the United States. The problem is that Sanctuary cities defy federal law,
endangers the citizens of that city and propose taxes that do not benefit the people who pay them.
According to the Daily wire, local, state, and federal statistics were sorted through to find that:
"'illegal immigrants are three times as likely to be convicted of murder as members of the general
population and account for far more crimes than their 3.5–percent share of the U.S. population
would suggest'"(Aaron Bandler, 9 Things You Need To Know About Illegal Immigration And
Crime). The data shown isolates the crime rates of the undocumented immigrants compared to an
average United States citizen. However, because there are many articles showing contradicting
statistics, the fault in that is that the others articles trying to prove that undocumented immigrants do
not raise crimes. The fault there is that those reports calculate the average crime rate of the city
instead of isolating cases.
A professor named Jan C. Ting discusses the legality of Sanctuary Cities, in ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Tax dollars that ought properly to benefit the people who paid them to go instead to underwrite
hospital, police, prison and education services for those who are not entitled to be here in the first
place" (ACRU, The Top Five Reasons to Oppose "Sanctuary Cities"). The fact that Sanctuary Cities
do more taxes to give money to undocumented instead of benefiting those who paid taxes is not fair.
It's not fair because instead of taking care of the people who paid and underwriting hospitals, police,
and education system you give it to the undocumented who came without a

Drug Pros And Cons Essay
There are also some pro and cons of drug testing. Although drugs are seen in a negative manner
there are some advantages. Performance enhancements are also used to help recover from injuries
quickly. Drugs can also help reduce anxiety, pain, and stress. Drugs are known to have more of a
negative effect on health than positive (Jost, Kenneth 24). Although, they are known to have a short–
term enhancement they, "cause impotence, worsening acne, balding and "steroid rage." (Jost,
Kenneth 26). Another con of drug use is creating an unfair advantage. Performance enhancements
do not create a level playing field but rather a competitive advantage. The use of drugs can also
create health problems and death. Once addicted it may be hard to become sober. The use of steroids
can create liver abnormalities, altered appearances, and psychiatric illnesses(Wong, Glenn 50).
Finally, the use of drugs can create legal penalties and expenses. A major case in the professional
sport industry that has a huge influence on anti–doping are the following is BALCO. BALCO is a
scandal that involves the use of performance enhancements. Barry Bonds a former Major League
Baseball player was found to be in a scandal with his former trainer Greg Anderson. Because
Anderson was found guilty of giving athletes steroids this led to the speculation of Bonds using
drugs. His defense was that the drugs were used for arthritis and dietary needs. However, Barry
Bonds were convicted for four counts perjury and one

President Richard Nixon's Resignation In The United States
President Richard Nixon did several things while in office that eventually led to his resignation in
1974. The most significant is that he plotted to wiretap and steal from different offices and other
spaces to gather information to help lead to re–election and he also tried to cover up and lie about
the scandal when it all unfolded. 1) "Nixon created a special investigative unit known as the
"plumbers" to gather information..." (Foner, GML, 1031). These "plumbers" were all former
employees for the CIA, which later led the FBI to believe that the break–ins where operated by the
CIA. When the scandal broke, the uncovered White House tapes also led to his resignation. 2) He
was heard saying on the Smoking Gun tape, "Yeah, when I saw that news summary

The Obstruction Of Power In George Orwell's Animal Farm
The Obstruction of Power Throughout Animalism
"The pigs did not actually work, but directed and supervised the others. With their superior
knowledge it was natural that they should assume the leadership"– Pages 27–28. The book that this
is present in, is Animal Farm by George Orwell. George Orwell wrote Animal Farm hoping his
readers would see the comparison to the Soviet Union through allegory, and symbols. The Animal
Farm was ultimately a failure because of power; more specifically, because the obstruction of power.
Throughout the book it is seen how most animals in power obstruct certain rights, this greatly
impacts the influence of power on the animals. The majority of the downfall of Animal Farm is
based around how the animals have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another example of the obstruction of power is on page 80, "That was our mistake, comrade. For
we know now it is written down in the secret documents that we have found – that in reality he was
trying to lure us to our doom." This quote came from when Napoleon was talking about the Battle of
Cowshed with Boxer. The documents they "found" were most likely forged by Napoleon and
Squealer themselves making it seem that Snowball was a traitor. They were also taking advantage of
the animals' inability to read, and the fact that the animals looked up to the pigs.
Obstruction of power never would have occurred if the peace, and unity, from the start of the book,
continued on for the rest of it. For example, there is a great difference between Snowball's rule, and
Napoleon's. Snowball believed in the actuality of Communism/Animalism and that all animals
should work together on equal grounds to look forward to a greater future. Napoleon was crazed for
power, and when he had finally gotten it, he abused and misused it. Napoleon made it obvious that
he was "more equal" than all other animals, and that they were on lower grounds then he and his
main conspirators were. Napoleon twisted the Seven

Mrs. Maloney: Long And Hard Punishment
Dora Castillo Pivec
Honors English
Session 1
I believe that Mrs. Maloney deserves a long and hard punishment for the murder of her husband, Mr.
Maloney. Some reasons as to why she deserves a long and harsh time in prison is that she committed
first–degree murder, covered up and destroyed evidence, lied to the police, and she could possibly
be a danger to others. Firstly, Mrs. Maloney murdered her husband Mr. Maloney. She committed
murder by bashing her husband in the back of the head with a frozen lamb leg. First degree murder
under accordance to the law is punishable by death or life in imprisonment. Secondly, Mrs. Maloney
had tried to cover up the crime by destroying the evidence in a rather clever and ironic way. She fed
the murder

The Pros And Cons Of Murdere Punishment
Have you ever wondered how many innocent people are serving time in prison? Well, in 2015, 149
people were exonerated from prison because they were falsely convicted of crimes. One of the many
incidents of this was the case against Glenn Ford. He was sentenced to death by electrocution in
1984 for robbery and first degree murder of Isadore Rozeman. He spent 30 years in prison until
2014, when he was exonerated. The reason for choosing this topic is because although numbers are
decreasing, there are still people who have been falsely convicted and sent to prison; and at least
4.1% of innocents are on death row. We must stop this corruption of false convictions in the court.
If "false conviction" is an unfamiliar term, a false conviction is when an innocent defendant is
convicted of a crime they never committed. This is considered an injustice because there are more
than 8,000 people who are on death row for something they never did. The courts should be where
the people find the truth of the trial, but this rarely happens. Some trials may have the truth come to
light, but not many. Instead, it has only resolved conflicts between the defendant and plaintiff. As
stated prior, although there are decreasing numbers, it is still an injustice that occurs.
There are many ways that false convictions occur. One example is what prosecutors do with
evidence. It has been shown that some prosecutors would fabricate, or create evidence illegally to
show the defendant's guilt, or hide

A Synopsis of the Movie Fletch Essay
"Fletch" The movie "Fletch", staring Chevy Chase, is a movie about an investigating reporter for a
Los Angeles newspaper, Erwin Fletcher "Fletch", loitering around a beach in attempt to pass as a
beach junkie with the intention of getting to the bottom of the drug trade and attempting to figure
out who is behind the whole thing. While "working" the beaches, Fletch runs into a businessman
who asks him to murder him so his wife will inherit the life insurance policy. Fletch, being the
investigative reporter senses something fishy and does what he does best, investigates the situation.
Along the way, Fletch commits many illegal acts and crimes in attempt to get to the bottom of the
situation. Although his intentions are good, Fletch gets ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Fletch did not actually steal a credit card and charge things to it, he did fraudulently use
Mr. Underhill's credit at the club to get food and drinks for himself. I think proving theft in this case
against Fletch would not be so hard to prove in the Court of Law simply because there is so much
evidence and the crime follows the books exactly. On the other hand, proving credit fraud might be
a little tougher to successfully charge Fletch with. Since Fletch did not actually use a credit device,
which by my knowledge is the only way to get in trouble for credit fraud, it might be easier for the
defense to get around. Either way, Fletch did commit multiple crimes in this scene, which could be
punishable by jail time. Around the middle of the movie, police officers come to the beach to
"arrest" the black man in the movie, another drifter on the beach. In attempt to find out more, Fletch
goes to the scene of the arrest and tries to stop the police from beating this man. Although the police
officers were using excessive force, Fletch has no right to interfere with an arrest by a law
enforcement officer. According to the law regarding Obstructing Justice, one is guilty of obstruction
of justice is he/she unlawfully attempts to interfere with the administration of courts, the judicial
system, or law enforcement officers. In this particular case, Fletch interferes with a law enforcement
officers attempt to make an arrest by trying to set the arrestee

Need Destruction Of Justice Code Case Study
Need Obstruction of Justice Code Article Title: "Ex–liquor board director admits tipping off those in
bribery scheme to FBI probe" Source/Author/Date of Publication: The Washington Post/Lynh
Bui/October 18, 2017 Who? o David Dae Sok Son, liquor board commissioner of Prince George's
County in Maryland. o Liquor store and restaurant owners in Prince George's County. o Liquor
lobbyists in Prince George's County. o Former delegates, William Campos and Michael Vaughn.
What? o During his tenure as liquor board commissioner, Son tried to increase liquor sales in Prince
George's County by encouraging the use of Sunday liquor licensees. o In order to accomplish this
goal, Son partnered with storeowners and lobbyists to bribe ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Need Obstruction of Justice Code Article Title: 3 Chicago Officers Charged With Conspiracy in
Laquan McDonald Case Source/Author/Date of Publication: The New York Times/Monica Davey
and Mitch Smith/June 27th, 2017 Who? o Laquan McDonald, an African American teenager who
was shot by a policeman. o Officer Jason Van Dyke, the policeman that is accused of murdering
Laquan Duncan. o Detective David March, Patrol Officer Joseph Walsh, and Patrol Officer Thomas
Gaffney are the three police officials accused of lying to protect Van Dyke. What? o In October
2014, the police were sent out to search the streets of Chicago for a man using a knife to break into
residents' cars. o Laquan Duncan was found a holding a knife, and Van Dyke claims that he shot
Duncan in self–defense. o However, video footage shows that Duncan was trying to run away, rather
than threatening the officers with his knife. o Gaffney, March, and Walsh lied about the series of
events that occurred that evening in order to backup Van Dyke's story. o In addition, these three
officers, failed to interview potential witnesses. The accounts from the witnesses would have proved
that Duncan did not agitate police officers. o It may be of some relief to know that March and Walsh
are no longer employed with the Chicago Police Force. Where? o The murder took place in
Chicago, and involved members of its Fraternal

High School Students Were Attending The End Of Summer Parties
Steubenville, Ohio, August 11, 2012. High school students were attending the end of summer parties
after a triumphant Big Red scrimmage game. The fun results in Ma'lik Richmond age 16 and Trent
Mays age 17, two star football players, being charged with rape. Three parties were attended that
night by four football players, two of which were Mays and Richmond, along with a 16–year–old
female, Jane Doe, who was acquainted with Mays. The first party was given by another 16–year–old
girl whose parents were not home, with an estimated 50 or more teens in attendance, but when her
older brother arrived, he broke up the party. According to witnesses, Jane Doe appeared to be
intoxicated when she left. She had been drinking a large blend of liquors. The second party was held
by a member of the football team and his mother eventually made anyone who was not spending the
night leave. During this time, Jane Doe was seen vomiting several times. The third party, 10–15
minutes away, was also held by a team member. In route to the third party, witnesses say that Jane
Doe who was not responsive was being recorded by cellphone as her breasts were exposed and she
was digitally penetrated by Mays. According to the Ohio revised code "2907.01 ...insertion, however
slight, of any part of the body or any instrument, apparatus, or other object into the vaginal or anal
opening of another..., (Law writer, 2008)" is rape. Once inside the third home Mays allegedly tried
to orally rape Jane Doe. Mays and

Obstruction Of Justice In Huckleberry Finn
Obstruction of justice is the act of interfering with the procedures of the court or its officers. These
acts include threatening witnesses, inappropriate talk with jurors, hiding evidence, or inferring with
an arrest, which are all punishable crimes (LII Staff "Obstruction of Justice"). In modern times,
obstruction of justice happens regularly. For example, in June of 2015, a man by the name of David
Daoud Wright was charged on multiple accounts, one of which was obstruction of justice. Wright
was charged with obstruction of justice for alleged deleting all information and data from his laptop
and erasing the call log from his phone, and also for instructing his uncle to destroy his personal
laptop (Redmond, Lisa "Everett Man Charged By Feds With Obstruction of Justice"). ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Huckleberry Finn meets two men who beg him to assist them in running away from
trouble. This incident is explained when Twain writes, "I was about to dig out from there is a hurry,
but they was pretty close to me then, and sung out and begged me to save their lives –– said they
hadn't been doing nothing, and was being chased for it –– said there was men and dogs a–coming. ...
They done it, and soon as they was aboard I lit out for our towhead, and in about five or ten minutes
we heard the dogs and the men away off, shouting" (Twain 120). Here, Huckleberry Finn agrees to
help the two men run away from the men and dogs chasing them. By helping these men,
Huckleberry Finn is committing obstruction of justice by helping the criminals to run away from the
police searching for them. Later in the text, the man explain how they got themselves into trouble
stating that they played

The Pros And Cons Of President Nixon And The Watergate 7
After the break–in, Nixon needed to protect his image so that American's could still trust him. To
accomplish this, he let a number of employees take the blame for him. The Watergate Seven were a
group of men involved in the scandal, who were also advisors and aides to President Nixon. On
January 8, 1973, these men were put to trial. With urges from Nixon, five of the seven pleaded
guilty. Then on January 30, 1973, six of Nixon's aides and the lawyer for his re–election committee
were charged with perjury, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy to cover–up the break in. This
included John Mitchell, Harry Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, Charles W. Colson, Gordon Strachan,
and Kenneth Wells Parkinson. However, after the trial, CIA operative, James W. McCord, wrote a
letter to Judge John Sirica. In which he claimed that the defendants had pleaded guilty under duress.
He also said that they committed perjury and that others were involved in the Watergate break–in.
Leading to further pressure being put on Nixon and his alleged involvement in the break–in.
Eventually, Nixon's deceitful involvement would be revealed to the American public. When the
events of Watergate started to become revealed, Nixon still defended his innocence. On a televised
question and answer session in 1973, Nixon defended his innocence in the Watergate case. In the
interview, he stated, "In all my years of public life, I have never obstructed justice. I'm not a crook.
I've earned everything I got." When

1) What Did Arthur Andersen Contribute to the Enron Disaster?
1) What did Arthur Andersen contribute to the Enron disaster?
Arthur Andersen (AA) contributed to the Enron disaster when it has failed to the management by
failing to have Enron establish and enforce its own internal control. There has been flaws to AA's
internal control. There has been assumption that AA partners were too motivated by revenue
recognition thus, overlooking several criteria when providing their services to Enron. Additionally,
AA also recognised the retention of audit clients as vital and a loss of any clients would be
disadvantaged to an auditor's career. In AA internal control, the person who is able to make most of
the decisions is the person who is most concerned about the revenue or losses of the client's
company. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Of these transactions, most of it was not in the interest of Enron of Enron's shareholders; such as
profits and cash flows were manipulated and grossly inflated which caused misleading to the
investors. AA has also failed to recognise the Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP) –
which is accounting rules used to prepare, present and report financial statements for a wide variety
of entities used in United States. AA also did not advise Enron's audit committee that Enron's CFO –
Andrew Fastow – and his helpers were involved in significant conflict of interests. Enron's politics
and internal control was also found out to be inadequate to protect the shareholders interests. These
should have made known and clear as these are responsibilities of an auditor. AA has also make the
mistake by which it did not act upon evidence found or neither has it find any audit evidence
relating to the numerous share rights transferred to SPEs and the side deals between Enron and
banks which remove the banks' risk from transactions. In auditing, audit documentations are key
part to the audit processes.
3) What was the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen's audit partners of the
Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management and Sunbeam UDITS: Cite examples that reveal this
motivation?
The prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen's audit

Bill Clinton Scandal Analysis
The scandal between Former President Bill Clinton and his intern Monica Lewinsky is one of the
most well known scandals in United States history. This scandal that took place from 1995 to 1997
had at least 10 sexual encounters involving Clinton and Lewinsky. This series of encounters, along
with other things led to President Clinton being impeached.
There were a few people who were involved. One of the most important people is Bill Clinton. He
was the 42nd president of the United States. The next individual is Monica Lewinsky, who was an
intern at the White House who had clearance to get into the Oval Office. Another person involved is
not one who was physically involved in the scandal. This person is Betty Currie. She was the person
who granted or denied people access into the Oval Office. She ended up having to testify in the
Jones v. Clinton case. She is also accused of knowing about the affair and not informing anyone of
it. Linda Tripp ends up being one of the biggest sources of information regarding this scandal. Linda
Tripp was a worker for the public affairs office at the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
President Clinton was obviously the most affected. He had many fines to pay along with many
investigations and an impeachment. He also suffers the consequence of being known as one of the
least truthful presidents in United States history. The next person who suffered a lot due to this
scandal was President Clintons wife, Hillary Clinton. She had to deal with the fact that her husband
had cheated on her. Though the marriage is still going, It is said that 1998 was a very rough year for
her and President Clinton. Though many have no mercy on Monica Lewinsky because it was "her
own fault", she did suffer because of the scandal. The main effect on her because of the scandal was
that she was no longer seen as a person. She has also been shamed by many people because of her

The Impeachment of President Bill Clinton
The Impeachment of President Bill Clinton The impeachment of President Clinton is something that
will be remembered forever. Along with the fact that a presidential impeachment has only happened
one other time since the Civil War, the publicity that came with the Clinton trial was extensive
(Miller 2004). While the Republican and Democratic members of the House of Representatives had
vastly different views on impeaching President Clinton, the fact that only five Democratic
Representatives voted to impeach him truly shows how wide that gap was between the two parties.
Clinton was impeached on the grounds of perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice, with the
vote on both articles extremely close, a 228–206 vote on perjury to a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Whatever the merits of that argument, such action is clearly unnecessary. There is no need or
justification for us to take this important action in such haste" (Rothenberg and Sanders 2000). In
another case, Democrat Rush Holt defeated Republican Michael Pappas in the 1998 contest of New
Jersey's 12th Congressional District, but Pappas still cast his vote on the impeachment. Holt
believed that Pappas should withdraw his impeachment vote because "it's a matter of historic
significance and he doesn't have to answer to anybody" (Rothenberg and Sanders 2000). Against
Holt's and many others' views, Pappas, along with the other thirty–nine representatives in their final
term, participated in the impeachment trial while facing no electoral accountability (Rothenberg and
Sanders 2000). While the Democrats still could have received some votes from the departing
Republican representatives, the chances that enough Republican representatives would vote non–
guilty to create a Democratic majority were very slim. In the 105th Congress, the House of
Representatives consisted of 227 members from the Republican Party, 207 members from the
Democratic Party, and one member who was Independent but sided with the Democrats
(Congressional Pictorial Directory). With the fifty–two percent Republican majority, as long as all
227 Republicans voted for the counts of impeaching Clinton, no Democratic votes would be needed.
This proved to be the

Boston Marathon Bombing Case Study
The Boston Marathon Bombing occurred on April 15, 2013. Three people died during the bombing.
Several were injured two–hundred sixty more. (boston.com) The suspects were students at the
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Each suspect was arrested for the connection with the
Bombing on May 1, 2013. There were several witnesses during their case. The charges were severe.
Dzhokhar was ordered to pay restitution to the victims. There were a lot of law enforcement
personnel involved in the case. Investigative techniques were used to link the suspects to the
Bombing. Investigators had evidence to prove who set off the bombs during the marathon.
Surveillance cameras showed two of the suspects. Dzhokhar was carrying a bag and a phone. The
bombs were set off seconds away from each other. Two of the suspects were found by the police
because they hijacked a car while using a gun and when the suspect escaped he went into a gas
station and contacted the police and that's when they received all the information they needed to get
the suspects into custody. There were charges brought against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Azamat
Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was the person that planned the bombing. He
and his friends faced thirty counts of charges alleging that he and his brother set off bombs killing
two women and an eight–year–old boy. Dzhokhar's friends were charged with conspiracy, heroin
trafficking, and obstruction of justice. Azamat was a citizen of Kazakhstan and he

Pardoning Nixon: Obstruction Of Justice Or Punishment Enough?
Pardoning Nixon: Obstruction of Justice or Punishment Enough? Following Nixon's resignation in
the year 1974, Gerald Ford replaced Richard Nixon as the 38th president of the United States, an
event that would change the future of America. Due to the Watergate scandal, an incident where
President Nixon was accused of deleting White House tapes that supposedly proved he coordinated
an illegal break–in to the Watergate Hotel, Nixon felt he was no longer fit to serve as president.
Rather than face impeachment, Nixon opted to resign, leaving his vice president in charge. In lieu of
facing charges for obstruction of justice, Ford granted Nixon a pardon, which eliminated any
possibility of a trial. Consequently, President Ford's pardon caused much controversy as to whether
or not this proved that the president was above the law. For this reason, many argue that Nixon
should be put on trial for his crimes, while others believe the humiliation in resignation was
punishment enough. While both statements have valid arguments, one has more reason to believe
that Nixon deserved to be put on trial due to the equality of all lawbreakers and the impact the
scandal on the American people. Although the president exerts a great amount of power over the
American people, he should not have immunity in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This inequality between the president and his administration proved that the president is above the
law, which should not be the case. Similarly, the negative impact on the American people
demonstrated that a president's actions can have lasting effects long after the president is out of
office. To conclude, the pardoning of Nixon after his resignation is a very controversial event that
has made a powerful impact on the way Nixon views government

Justice In Plato's The Republic
The Republic, written by Plato, examines one major question throughout the readings and it is
"What is justice?" To the common eye justice can be easily defined with a quick look in a dictionary
and is often defined as being fair. Plato's main character, Socrates goes to much deeper lengths than
this to define what justice is. This essay will look to reassess the discussion of justice between
Socrates and Polemarchus and identify a problem that arises with justice, "the love of ones own". To
better explain this problem an example derived from Polemarchus' and Thrasymachus' versions of
justice will be used. I will also briefly touch on the story of The Ring of Gyges to further convey
how "the love of ones own" is an obstruction to justice. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Ring of Gyges provides a ring that can make its owner invisible. This invisibility adequately
exemplifies that human beings will do unjust acts if they are not being watched such as steal
(Republic 41). These acts further prove that many act in self–interest and totally neglect the idea of
what justice really is. This is a huge problem. This problem later presents a basis for why Socrates
just city has so many boundaries and restrictions. This is absolutely necessary in creating just people
who do not act out of urges and self–love but rather out of necessity to help the city as a

The Pressures Of Running A Successful Business
The pressures of running a successful business may present ethical dilemmas at one point or another
in the life of a business leader. Consider the many leaders and entrepreneurs who face challenging
situations. One such leader is Arthur Andersen who became bankrupt and was forced to shut down
his prestigious ninety–year–old auditing company, finding himself in the middle of several scandals,
but one in particular befell him for good. From a man of integrity, for over ninety long years, to his
infamous conduct which resulted in him being brought to court and indicted by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions (SEC) before a grand jury for making bad leadership decisions.
In October, 2001, Arthur Andersen, the supervisor of the Enron account, found himself in deep hot
water with the Enron Oil Company in Texas, as the SEC announced that an investigation into the
accounting of Enron was pending (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2011). On November 8, 2001, Enron
was forced to present its financial statements of five years to which Andersen was the auditor
(Ferrell, 2011). About five hundred and eighty–six million dollars in losses were ascertained and
therefore, Enron, was forced into bankruptcy one month afterwards (Ferrell, 2011). By December
2001 Enron filed bankruptcy (Ferrell, 2011). This event triggered a domino effect and as Enron's
accountant, Andersen was charged for obstruction of justice.
Accountants measure and disclose financial information, with assurance of accuracy to

Similarities Between Clinton And Johnson
The presidencies of Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were unusual compared to all the rest. Clinton
and Johnson were both impeached by the U.S Representatives, but were never kicked out of office
by the Senate. However the two impeachments were similar and different in many ways. The first
president to ever be put on trial for impeachment was Andrew Johnson. Johnson would start out as
the running mate for Lincoln and would become his vice president. In 1865, Johnson would take
over as president following Lincoln's assassination. During his presidency his power and popularity
would decline massively. Within months of each other he would veto the Freedman's Bureau Bill
and the Civil Rights Bill, but they would be passed over his veto. Riots would soon start to break
out. In February 1867, congress would pass the Tenure of Office Act, which would in hopes keep the
Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, at ease. Johnson would be punished because he violated this act
due to suspending and then dismissing the Secretary of War. His impeachment trial began in 1868.
The trial began in the Senate and Johnson would be acquitted with a vote of ... Show more content
This trial took place in 1999. Before Clinton was ever elected as president he had an encounter with
a women by the name of Paula Jones. Paula Jones would come out about the encounter after Clinton
was elected to presidency. In July of 1995, women by the name of Monica Lewinsky would be hired
as an intern for Clinton. Months later they would begin having sexual relations. Mr. Kenneth Starr
was put in charge of the investigation of Clinton and Lewinsky's relationship. Clinton denies the fact
that he had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky at all times. In October 1998, the House would
vote to have an impeachment trial and would win with a vote of 258 to 176. By the time the trial
ended, Bill Clinton would not be kicked out of the office by the

Martha Stewart Ethical Behavior
Introduction
Martha Stewart is an American Home decorator Icon surrounded by accusations of Inside trading,
Obstruction of justice, False statements and Conspiracy. Her trial and investigation lasted for two
years ending with her being found guilty of charges and convicted to spend time in jail, home arrest
and probation. In this work I will expose Martha Stewart's behavior and why her actions were
considered outlaw, unethical and unprofessional. I will also explain which ethical behavior she used
and how that affects her image, financial status, social position, fame and followers.
But who is Martha Stewart and what is her background? I personally didn't know who Martha
Stewart was until her case came out to the public, still until today ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Security and Exchange Commission is the organization who monitors fraudulent transactions
and insider trading. Some experts in ethical behavior consider inside trading the most dramatic form
of utilitarian ethics.
Martha's Ethical Behavior
Since 2002 Martha Stewart was investigated by the SEC and the FBI for Inside Trading but it is
interesting that she wasn't found guilty or accused on any of those charges; she was charge for
conspiracy, obstruction of justice and false statement. It was her un–ethical behavior what drove her
into innumerable allegations and public embarrassments. There are at least four issues in this case
where ethics play a very interesting and critical role; Freedom of speech, Conspiracy, Right of
property and Inside trading.
1. Freedom of Speech
When Martha Stewart was accused the first problem presented was the Media and how her case was
going to be handled. Martha's Stewart lawyer Robert Morvillo along with Martha's publicist and
show producers orchestrated a plan to keep Martha's image as clean and honest as possible. They
didn't waste time by using the media, Martha's TV show and Magazine to defend her position and
manipulate the public opinion towards Martha's innocence. It is clear that in court previous
information and announcements of her innocence will create in the future juror's minds the
reasonable doubt needed to find her innocent. The judge immediately imposed a gag order to control
the flow of information and to avoid

Were The Whitewater Hearings A Persecution By Republicans...
Argument
Were the Whitewater Hearings a persecution by Republicans or a justified inquiry?
Abstract
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman." was one of Bill Clinton's famous political one–
liners. In the past decade, many people have made it their mission to prosecute Democratic
President William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton for committing real estate fraud known as the Whitewater
scandal and his involvement in numerous illicit sex scandals like the Paula Jones lawsuit and the
Monica Lewinsky lawsuit to name a few. The significance of the Whitewater trials and the
impeachment of the president is that it served as an example for future presidents and assured the
people that the president is subjected to the law, not above it. If he ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Paragraph one
The Whitewater Scandal was a fraudulent land scheme involving the former Governor of Arkansas,
William Jefferson Bill Clinton and his wife Hilary Rodham Clinton who partner with Susan and Jim
McDougal to purchased land worth $203,000 with the intention of building vacation homes. It was
called the Whitewater Development Corp. In 1982, their venture unfortunately failed and Clinton
brought a small saving and loans association: Madison Guaranty. This eventually raised suspicions,
which led federal regulators to question Madison Guaranty's financial stability and lending
practices. It is important to remember the alleged wrongdoing all occurred before Clinton was
elected president in 1992, but the investigation continued into the presidents' second term in office
in 1996. Even though the Whitewater Development failed financially, neither President Clinton nor
Hilary Clinton were able to pocket any profit. Once Bill Clinton announced that he was running for
president, the national media began investigating Clinton (Gormley, Ken). The national media
discovered that the Whitewater Development associated the Clintons in dealings that were
questionable to the extent of corruption through illegal loans. Further investigation revealed that
Clinton was also abusing his powers in the office by pressuring women to interact in sexual
activities with him. From the Republicans perspective, the impeachment of Clinton exacerbated the

Explain The Three Branches Of Government
Branches of US Government The Three Branches and their Powers The three branches of the US
government are the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. The judiciary consists of the
Supreme Court and other courts. The Legislature is also known as Congress is made up of the House
of Representatives and the Senate (The White House, n.d). The president heads the executive arm of
the government and he works with thousands of workers who facilitate the execution of the
government's mandate. The constitution vests power in the three arms so that they are able to carry
out their mandate. The judiciary enjoys the power to interpret the law and issue rulings on numerous
issues (The White House, n.d). Justices are the main parties in this branch and they are able to make
rulings that are to be honored. The constitution also offers the executive the power to implement
laws and policies. The president is at the forefront in implementing the policies of his
administration. The executive wields power over such issues as health, education and defense. The
US Congress enjoys the power to make laws. State and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I also believe that justice is an integral component of integrity and government officials serving in
the judiciary who obstruct justice commit corruption. The mismanagement of public funds and the
obstruction of justice are examples of corruption in the executive and judicial arms of the
government. An example of corruption in the legislature is an instance where a member of Congress
who accepts bribes from the business community. I have observed that corruption is more rampant
at the state levels of government. The case of Bob McDonnall who served as Virginia Governor and
convicted on corruption charges makes this clear. McDonnall betrayed public trust and his case
point to the rot and corruption in state

Hashtag Activism: Annotated Bibliography
The article I chose to discuss that I thought could be connected to this week's readings was an article
published by VICE News titled Is Trump's War on The DOJ Obstruction? Here's What You Need to
Know. This article was co–authored by Taylor Dolven and Alex Thompson and discusses whether
President Trump's use of the DOJ to investigate his claim that the FBI placed an informant within
his campaign circle for political reasons. Prior to his request, President Trump was already very
public and active with his constant attempts to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller on Twitter
and has recently demanded that the Department of Justice investigate a possible "spy". Legal
scholars are currently debating whether President Trump should be ordering ... Show more content
Here's What You Need to Know, discuss how Constitutional lawyers are also divided over this topic
because a ruling on this exact question has never been established by a court. The author's Taylor
Dolven and Alex Thompson were able to interview Susan Low Bloch, who is a professor at
Georgetown Law School and author of Inside the Supreme Court and she stated that "It mainly is a
'should' question, and the answer is you should not". She also says "Yes, he is the head of the
executive branch and the Justice Department is in the executive branch, but we have developed an
expectation and culture of keeping politics out of the Justice Department–and that's a good thing". I
can absolutely agree with her final statement provided in the interview and I was able to see a
connection to our textbook Keeping the Republic: Power and Citizenship in American Politics on
page 62 where the author's discuss the executive branch and include the following statement: " The
constitutional debates reveal that many of the founders were haunted by the idea that they might
inadvertently reestablish the same tyrannical power over themselves that they had only recently
escaped with the Revolution". In my opinion, these two factors are connected because nowadays
these types of debates could leave American citizens feeling as though history is repeating

Comtemporary Auditing
Campbell Soup Company 1. Identify legitimate business practices that corporate executives can use
for the primary purpose of manipulating or "managing" their company's reported operating results.
Are such practices ethical? Defend your answer.
Some examples of legitimate business practices that executives can use to manage their company's
reported operating results include: offering customers extended payment terms at the end of the a
period to accelerate sales, recording generous reserves in a good quarter to make it easier to meet
earnings goals is a later quarter, accelerating or postponing discretionary expenses such as
maintenance, advertising research and development and employee training, and pulling sales from a
future ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
SmarTalk Teleservices, INC. 1. Suppose that you are supervising a future audit engagement
involving a public company that has recently established a large restructuring reserve. What audit
objectives would you establish for that reserve? For each audit objective you list, identify audit
evidence that you would collect to help achieve that objective.
When a company restructures its operations, GAAP requires that the company recognizes the cost of
restructuring and associated liabilities. The auditor should examine restructuring charges and
reserves by reviewing FASB pronouncements and EITF statements to ensure that everything is
stated correctly. The auditor should also review how the company estimated the reserve account and
review actions taken by management that indicate that the restructuring is moving along as planned.
Auditors should test estimates by review restructuring documents and mathematically test those
estimates. Finally, the auditor should develop a conclusion as to the reasonableness of liability and
appropriateness of the company's accounts.
See Assertions: * Reserve expenses (EXP) * Reserves (LIAB) * Reserve (Liab) * Cash (asset)
EXAMPLE SEVERANCE PAY * EITF 94–3 documentation of the exit plan and the analysis of the
plan. AU 342. * EXISTENCE–ACUTUAL VALUATION, APPROIPRATE EXIT PLAN INQUIRE
AND

Racial Discrimination In The 19th Century Essay
A Criminal Obstruction of Justice: Racial Discrimination in the 19th Century The Merriam–Webster
dictionary defines lynching as "to put to death (as by hanging) by mob action without legal approval
or permission." The South's so–called "lynch law" was viewed as having ultimate supremacy over
court proceedings. Over the course of ten years, there were more than a thousand documented cases
of lynching in the United States. It is suspected that there were even more cases that went
undocumented. White Americans also tended to downplay the actual severity of hangings and
lynchings, especially in newspapers and editorials. There were many ways in which African
Americans were discriminated against by whites that led to the obstruction of justice, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first excuse basically consisted of the belief that murder was necessary in order to put an end to
alleged 'race riots'. However, no individual was found to be part of an insurrection, and no riot was
proven to have happened. When this excuse no longer permitted the lynchings to keep happening,
Southerners had to come up with a second excuse during Reconstruction. The second excuse was
based on the terrifying ideal of 'Negro domination' and the fact that African Americans legally held
the right to vote alongside the white man. Whites were outraged that black men held any rights at
all, and were determined to keep the government under the control of white men. However, as both
the North and outside countries continued to call for the end to this brutality, a third more solid
excuse had to be made. The third and final excuse claimed that African Americans must be killed in
order to put a stop to (and avenge) assaults against women. This was the most damaging
justification and it made the whole world believe that black men deserved the lynchings bestowed
upon them. None of these excuses were ever substantiated. African Americans were hanged without
ever getting a fair trial for their 'crimes'. When a journalist attempted to expose the South's horrible
crimes for what they were, many well–known figures and newspapers attempted to stop

Watergate Scandal Pros And Cons
Watergate Scandal
There are many scandals in the world, but this one in particular is very different.There was people
breaking into the Democratic headquarters.This is known as the watergate scandal.This leads to a
president to resign from office. The misconduct surrounding Watergate is very misleading.
In June 17th 1972 there was a break in at the Democratic National committee headquarters at the
Watergate hotel(Klara 1).They were trying to wiretap the Democratic National Committee, so The
republicans could rig the election.(wiretap,3)There were 5 men caught with eavesdropping
equipment that President Nixon ordered to happen(Mc.Geary 28).The co owner of the Watergate
hotel Cohen addressed this scandal by what she calls "playful little ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Watergate scandal after the trial was to fill in the official's positions that had to resign.The
president's position was taken by Vice President Gerald Ford due to Nixon's resign(position3). The
vice President position could not be filled until the next presidential campaign due to the former
Vice President taking over(vice president 1). While, the war in Vietnam and student

Moncrieff Community In Australia
Strategies, this is also important in an action plan development since it contains the methodologies
and ways which are followed for the same achievement of the community goals and objectives. To
create (or refine) procedures, obviously, depict how the exertion will realize the mission and
destinations. Distinguish for each level to be focused on i.e., people, families, and connection
gatherings, associations and divisions, and additionally more extensive frameworks. Distinctive
levels of your issue or objective will you target? For every procedure, consider on the off chance
that it will be general (i.e., incorporates those who might be at hazard or may profit; e.g. all
youngsters and youth) or focused on (i.e., focuses on the individuals who might be at more serious
hazard for the issue; e.g., youth with a background marked by viciousness
The individual and ecological elements to be tended to by the activity Individual components ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Justice/ human rights problem in Moncrieff society in Australia
Justice is my topic of discussion in my community action plan among the Moncrieff community in
Australia.
The mission of my action plan is to fight any other social problem in my community not only the
justice and human rights but also equality and problems which facilitate to the emergence of the
unrests and migration of people in my community each and every day.
The vision is to enhance justice in everyone in the community and ensure that there exist
brotherhood among the people in the Moncrieff community in Canberra and also the entire
Australia.
Objectives, my objective is to fight for justice, ensure that everybody in the community is aware of
the community developments, full participation of the community members in the building and
growth of our community, and fight for equal rights for all people in the

President Nixon 's Involvement On The Watergate Scandal Essay
To further maintain his innocence, President Nixon started creating distance between himself and
those of senior authority within his administration who could be directly linked to the Watergate
scandal. At this time, many of President Nixon's aides were either being prosecuted for obstruction
of justice, burglary, wiretapping, etc, or they were resigning their positions within the administration
due to the overwhelming evidence that was appearing against them in relation to their criminal
activities. Many of President Nixon's aides were either cutting a deal in court or preparing to testify
against the him in relation to their personal knowledge about the details of the scandal and their
personal knowledge about President Nixon's involvement. The characters that will be examined
were both senior politicians within the Nixon Administration as well as law enforcement agents and
high ranking attorneys. They will be investigated to determine their connection to the Nixon
Administration and their role in the Watergate scandal.
John Ehrlichman was the policy advisor for President Nixon. He was responsible for creating the
White House plumbers, which was a group of men who prevented leaks and insider information
about the Nixon Administration from getting in the hands of reporters. He was a loyal and patriotic
advisor, most of the time using unconventional and illegal methods to secure a victory. Ehrlichman
contributed to the cover up as he was the one who told FBI Director L.

Arthur Andersen 's Enron Case
The case is about Arthur Andersen 's role in accounting fraud at Enron; Enron was one of its Arthur
Andersen major clients. The criminal charges faced by Andersen in the Enron case and how the case
eventually led to the closure of the company. It was convicted in 2002 of one count of obstruction of
justice because of its role in Enron's auditing. After the conviction, the firm could no longer provide
public accounting services.
On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for getting rid of the
documents related to Enron's accounting audit which resulted in the its scandal. The impact of the
scandal combined with the criminal findings ultimately destroyed the Arthur Andersen LLP.
Disregarded Enron's accounting misbehave and misuse. The CFOs and controllers hired by Enron
company were former Arthur Andersen LLP executives; By getting rid of all Enron's documents,
and Arthur Andersen LLP attorney altered documents related to its audit work for Enron, the
company was handed the maximum penalty allowed under US law for its role in the collapse of
Enron. Arthur Andersen LLP CPA License has been canceled, and the CEO at the time, Joseph
Bernardini went to Jail. The company was fined $500,000 and sentenced to five years of probation.
2. Who was (were) the individual (s) and company (ies) involved
The companies involved in the case were Arthur Andersen LLP and Enron. In addition to Enron,
Arthur Andersen LLP was accused of being involved in

Arthur Andersen And Enron Case Essay
1.What was the case about? (Summary of the Case)
The case is about Arthur Andersen 's role in accounting fraud at Enron which was one of its major
clients. The criminal charges faced by the firm in the Enron case and how the Enron case eventually
led to the closure of Arthur Andersen company. The company was convicted in 2002 of one count of
obstruction of justice because of its role in Enron's auditing. After the conviction, the firm could no
longer provide public accounting services.
On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents
related to Enron's audit which resulted in the Enron scandal. The impact of the scandal combined
with the findings of criminal complicity ultimately destroyed the Arthur Andersen LLP. The
company was accused of destroying thousands of Enron documents that included not only physical
documents, but also computer files and Email files. By giving it the role of consultant along with
their original role as external auditors, Enron made Arthur Andersen LLP a key player in Enron
auditing.
Disregarded Enron's accounting misbehave and Misuse. CFOs and controllers hired by Enron
company were former Arthur Andersen LLP executives; shredded all Enron's documents, and Arthur
Andersen LLP attorney altered documents related to its audit work for Enron. Arthur Andersen LLP
has been handed the maximum penalty allowed under US law for its role in the collapse of Enron.
Arthur Andersen LLP CPA License has

Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Melissa Williams

More from Melissa Williams (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Watergate. Glenn L. Venner. Cincinnati State Community