1860 Presidential Election

1860 Presidential Election
The Election of 1860 There was a lot of people running, but not a lot of them were good.Lincoln was pretty much the only good presidential nominee
running. He was one of if not the only one who didn't really have an opinion on slavery. Abraham Lincoln, John C. Breckinridge, John Bell, and
Stephen A. Douglas are the presidential candidates for the 1860 presidential election. John C. Breckinridge, was part of the Southern Democratic Party
.John C. Breckinridge, was one of the runners. John C. Breckinridge, was representing the southern Democratic party. Breckinridge will serve as the
fourteenth Vice president. Breckinridge was born January 21st 1821 and died May 17th 1875. John Bell, ran in the Constitutional Union Party. John
Bell, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The secession was pushed mostly by the southern planters. Also known as the slave owners. They were afraid that the government was going to
eventually have anti–slavery supporters. Then they would outlaw slavery. This also destroyed the democratic party. It was split into 2 pieces. The
southern democrats and northern democrats. If Stephen Douglas, won I think the Civil War would go on even longer. I think that just because of the
simple fact that Abraham Lincoln, exposed him for not liking slavery in a debate. I think the economical resources would spread better and he would
help the country expand
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Presidential Elections : Presidential Election
Over the past seven decades, this nation's voter turnout has been dismal. The presidential election in 2012 had a voter turnout of about 57.5%. That
means a little over half of the voter population did not voice their opinion on who should be the nation's president for the next four years in the voting
booth. If this continues, there will be a president whom the general public may not want but could have prevented if all they did was vote. However,
the upcoming presidential election seems to be different from previous elections just due to the massive amount of attention it is receiving in the media.
Fox news had their largest viewer turnout when airing the republican debate, hitting a record of nearly 24 million viewers and the same goes ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He has expressed his beliefs on improving the middle class and disempowering the influence corporate America has in politics. The American people
have seen this and it shows in the polls as well as the donations Bernie receives. His campaign is funded by the American people and is not funded by
the billionaire class like other presidential candidates.
Bernie was invited to hold a convocation at Liberty University, a conservative university that is normally visited by Republicans who share the
similar views to the students. During the event, he states: "It is very easy for a candidate to speak to people who hold the same views. It's harder but
important to reach out to others who look at the world differently." This is the type of attitude that is required for a president, or arguably any person
in life, since not everyone in the world will hold the same viewpoint as you. It is through discussing each person's view that some common ground can
be made and only then can progress can be made on the issues that matter.
In 1962, Bernie Sanders was arrested for protesting segregation in public schools when he attended the University of Chicago. That was only the
beginning of his fight against racial inequality in America and addresses this issue in four fields: physical, political, legal, and economic. One of the
biggest issues outlined in this field is the level of incarceration this nation faces,

The 1960 Presidential Election
Kennedy is generally considered to have won the national popular vote by 112,827, a margin of 0.17% (although the unusual nature of the election in
Alabama has caused some to question this figure)[2] and though Nixon carried more individual states (26 to 22),[3] Kennedy won a 303 to 219
Electoral College victory.
The 1960 presidential election was the closest election since 1916, which can be explained by a number of factors.[4] Kennedy benefited from the
economic recession of 1957–58, which hurt the standing of the incumbent Republican Party, and he had the advantage of 17 million more registered
Democrats than Republicans.[5] Furthermore, the new votes that Kennedy, the first Roman Catholic president, gained among Catholics almost
neutralized

Presidential Elections And The Presidential Election
A Presidential Election, determines how the next four years would be. The election is a fight between different political parties, and they fight to win
and represent the political beliefs and values of their followers. In the 2016 Presidential Election, there are many candidates who ran for president.
There are main two main parties, the Democrat party and the Republican party, there were also many Third–party candidates. Donald Trump the
primary candidate for the Republicans ran with no political experiences and won while Hillary Clinton the primary Democrat candidate who was the
former sectary of state ran and lost. Not only was there a fight between the different parties, there also was fighting among each other and in individual
parties. Many parties had many different views on the issues of today world. They both made many different promises on each issue. When it came to
domestic issues the primary two parties agreed and disagreed on many things such as when it came to induvial rights. They both took many different
stances on the issues whether it was gun control, abortion and racial judgment in the criminal justice system.
An example would be when came to the right to have an abortion. Clinton who believed that the right to have an abortion should remain legal. She
said "but it needs to be safe and rare. And I have spent many years now, as a private citizen, as first lady, and now as senator, trying to make it rare,
trying to create the conditions where women

Presidential Elections : The Presidential Election
The 2016 Presidential Election has been one of the most bewildering experiences of my lifetime, but also, possibly the most telling event of where the
average American voter's values lie and the extent of our social progression. Personally, I, like many political scientists, educated scholars, politicians,
celebrity figures, stand–up comics, preteens on twitter, optimists, and the entirely of the modern liberal media, truly believed Hillary Clinton would
become our 45th, and 1st woman, president, but that did not seem to be the case. Donald J. Trump has won the 2016 Presidential Election, and I think i
speak for all of us when I say: I am stoked. This shocking turn of events, which seems to defy political polls, statistical analysis, historical and
governmental patterns, mathematics, and, frankly, common sense, has deemed my hypothesis to be incorrect, and like Hillary Clinton conceded the
election, I concede my prediction, but as clearly demonstrated, not my opinion. I digress; the results of this election have reasoning behind them.
Donald Trump won with 290 electoral votes in comparison with Hillary's 232 votes, even thought Hillary won the popular vote (47.9% to 47.1%).
55.4% of eligible voters participated in this year's election, with 26.5% of eligible voters siding with Hillary and 26.3% voting for Trump. The voter
turnout this year has fallen in correspondence with the last two decades in regards to presidential election; a significant amount of Americans abstained

The 1860 Presidential Election
How do you think the presidential election is going this year? Many people seem to think that this presidential election is a heated and controversial
debate between the Republican and Democratic Party. Some seem to think that as a nation we have never had such contention in an election and that
we will never be able to recover from such damage that this election will cause. But history tends to repeat itself in our nation; for example, some of
our past elections have caused fear in citizens' eyes just like this election has done. An example of this is, the presidential election of 1800 between
Thomas Jefferson and James Adams, this election caused great worry during that time period. Another election that worried our country deeply was the
presidential election of 1860 between Abraham Lincoln and John Breckinridge this election caused our great nation to be divided. Another similarity
that both these presidential elections have had, is that at the end of each election the American people have put their political views aside, and united ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He goes on to explain that both the candidates are untrustworthy in their campaign. Although the mass majority of what Glenn Beck say about each
the candidates is negative, he does say a few positive things about both of these candidates that I will later explain in the paper. Currently at this
point, in the presidential election, Glenn Beck has not officially endorsed any of the running candidates, but he has given his opinion on each one of
them. He has described each of the candidate's strengths and weakness during the Presidential Debate. He also states on the website and goes into
great depth on his opinion on each of their policies for office, and how he thinks each of the candidates it will affect America in the future if they
become the

The Presidential Election Of 1980 Essay
On Tuesday, 4 November 1980, The United States presidential election of 1980 was held. The competition was between incumbent Democratic
President Jimmy Carter and his opponent, former Californian Republican Governor, Ronald Reagan. Reagan, assisted by a falling economy
complicated by inflation and high unemployment, and the Iran hostage crisis, Reagan would win the election in a sweep, receiving the largest number
of electoral votes ever tallied by a presidential candidate not currently in office. Jimmy Carter, who beat out Edward M. Kennedy for the nomination for
Democratic leader, attacked Reagan as a wild right–wing fundamentalist. The former actor, Ronald Reagan pledged to elevate the cynical mood of the
nation, and won a conclusive victory. This election marked the creation of what was called the "Reagan Revolution," and indicated a conservative
repositioning in national government.
Throughout the 1970s, the United States underwent a wrenching period of low economic growth, high inflation and interest rates, and intermittent
energy crises. In the spring and summer of 1979, inflation was on the rise and various parts of the United States were experiencing energy shortages,
Carter was widely blamed and planned on delivering a major speech about energy conservation, but he thought the American public did not care for
what he had to say. In the mist of all this, Carter went on the presidential retreat for the bilateral treaty on Camp David. "For more than a week, a

Three Presidential Elections
Presidential elections have and continue to be a time where Americans begin to pay attention to politics a little more in depth, they look into the issues
which burden America, and then decide which candidate, in their views would fix and continue to grow the policies and programs which are working
to America's advantage. Presidential elections have and will continue to grow and change, but the past three presidential elections have seen many
changes and have been very different just in the course of 12 years. Although a lot has changed there are some major things that have dramatically
changed just from election to election such as, campaign strategy and spending, "battleground states" or states which could vote for either candidate, the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the 2004 election at the forefront of discussion was the Iraq War, and terrorism and Homeland Security. In 2008 war in Iraq continued as a major
issue, taxes and the economy moved into the spotlight also. In 2012, improving the economy shifted into the spotlight and getting rid of the deficit,
also public services such as Medicare, Medicaid and social security. So as you can see issues continued to grow and those that are solved the ones that
are not continue to evolve, and it's a vicious cycle that constantly

Upcoming Presidential Election
3 Things to Keep in Mind for the Upcoming Presidential Election
1. Only about 10% of the entire nation voted for Trump OR Clinton
Yup, that's right, only about 10% of the entire nation voted for Donald Trump OR Hilary Clinton, yet they are still the Presidential Candidates from
the Republican and Democratic Parties. How? In the presidential primaries Donald Trump won the state of Alabama with roughly 43% of all the
voters. However, only .3% of registered voters voted for him at all. In a state of 4.8 million, only 14000 voted. In Tennessee, Hillary won with 66% of
3.7% of the total registered. While substantially higher than Trump's Alabama win, it is still an unacceptably low turnout for thevoting of the possible
President of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Third party voters are sometime the difference between a victory and a loss for a presidential candidate. Most don't mention it, but you do have power.
Each and every vote counts. While a 3rd might not win the election, they still impact it. Al Gore would have won the 2000 presidential election if he
had received 1% of the votes that Ralph Nader, Green Party Presidential Nominee, received. 3rd party voters helped to give the win to George W.
Bush. Not only do 3rd party voters impact who wins the election, but they can convince candidates to change their platforms. Candidates want
voters, a handful of voters can mean the difference between a Republican President or a Democratic President. In order to get these key voters,
they change the way they phrase responses, comments, and their general speech. For example, take Donald Trump. Just listen to how his tone
changes between each debate, every appearance, even between every tweet. He's trying to secure key groups to his victory that would normally
vote 3rd party or not vote at all. However, if you don't like the changes either candidate has made and still feel as if this is a "lesser of the two evils"
election, then vote 3rd party. Who knows? Maybe Gary Johnson will be this winner, all it requires is for you to actually register and

Presidential Election : Presidential Debates
In order to determine the best candidate to be our national leader, it is imperative that citizens watch the broadcasted presidential debates before casting
their ballots. These debates give each representative of the two most influential political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, time to demonstrate
their contrasting viewpoints, and otherwise allow the voter to understand each candidate's personality. During our psychology class this semester, we
were privileged to write essays on the three presidential debates between Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and Republican nominee, Donald
Trump. In order to succeed in this task, it was imperative that we incorporate psychology terms in conjunction with the candidates; only now can we
reveal our informed opinions about the results of this 2016 Presidential Election. During the three presidential debates, I tried to watch Hillary Clinton
unbiased, as I admittedly wanted her to become our president. Overall, I found Clinton to be mature, and to be overwhelmingly habituated to Trump's
condescending comments. Despite Trump's disrespectful remarks regarding women and other minorities, Clinton was calm, and simply spoke to the
viewers regarding his rhetoric. Her peaceful demeanor demonstrated habituation in that, although Trump can become very offensive, she chose to rise
above the trying stimulus he displayed, and ultimately appeared to be the better candidate for presidential office. In response to audience phobias

2012 Presidential Elections
The results of both the 2004 and 2012 Presidential elections were the same as both incumbents were able to capitalize on the voters being comfortable
with them. Additional, since both incumbents had access to national assets, four years of on the job training, and "insider information" they were able
to speak in–depth on a wide range of issues both foreign and domestic. In 2004, the largest and most important issue to the nation was the war in Iraqi
and in 2012 it was the nation's economy. Given the incumbents access to firsthand information on the issues at large, they were able to weaken their
opponents in the nation's eyes by dismantling the candidate's strategies on the issues. History has shown that nations trend to focus more on domestic...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Campaign Strategies used by the incumbents in both the 2004 and 2012 presidential elections were direct and aggressive, using media outlets to launch
phased targeting to discredit candidates by highlighting indecisiveness and lacking of understand on controversial issues. In both elections the
candidates that successful used the media were able to garnered support from nation as they were able to stay steps ahead of their opponents, forcing
them to constantly defend themselves and legalize their campaigns. For example, President Obama used ads to undermine Mitt Romney's time running
the investment firm Bain Capital (strength of Romney's campaign) against him, stating that because of Mitt Romney's time at Bain he would be unable
to relate to average. This forced Romney to alter his campaign strategy as more Americans began to question Romney stance on multiple issues,
especially taxes, during an election in which the primary issue was the nation's economy. Similar strategies were utilized in the 2004 and 2012
elections, giving the incumbents a huge advantage from day one. When you combine the election results and campaign strategy with the voter turnout
with only a 2–5 percent difference in voting age population turnout, it is clear why both elections resulted in the incumbent being reelected. I believe
that the nation applied the old saying, "if it is not broke, then don't fix it" during both the 2004 and 2012 presidential

Evolution Of Presidential Elections
The U.S. constitution assigned the task of handling elections to the states with the result being fifty diverse election systems. At the legislative level,
elections for the U.S. House of Representatives are held every two years and the Senate elections are conducted every six years. Typically, the
president's party will lose seats in most elections; however, incumbents have a strong propensity for winning reelection. The average campaign cost for
a House of Representatives seat is over $1.7 million and the average cost for a Senate race is $10.5 million. Thus, candidates spend numerous hours
raising money over the phone, through the mail, and at fundraising events. The money raised pays for everything from television ads to campaign
paraphernalia. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first phase is the nominating process. The states work with the national parties to firm up their specific primary election date. More Americans show
up to vote in the general election than in the primaries. A winning nominee must pick up a defined number of convention delegates that are divvied out
based on state population. Traditionally, a winner–take–all system where a candidate had to win all of the delegates in order win the state has been
used by the Republican Party. Recently, the Republican Party has moved to the same system as the Democrats. The Democratic Party selects their
candidate through a proportional representation system whereby the delegates are assigned based on the proportion of the vote the candidate wins.
The second presidential election phase consists of the two major party conventions and takes place in the summer before the election. Conventions can
give the party's nominee a lift in the polls, or an electoral boost, lasting days into weeks. The third phase of the presidential election is the general
election, which begins after the conventions and ends on Election Day. During general election phase, two or three debates are held between the

Presidential Election Winner
Presidential Election Winner
The 2016 presidential election was one of the most controversial elections to have ever faced the American people. Both major political parties ran on
completely opposite platforms which caused the American people to be divided more than ever on policies and beliefs. In fact, the outcome of the
election took the media, the American people and the world by surprise. This only divided the American people even further. The Democrats were
certain that their candidate, Hillary Clinton, was to be the winner over Donald Trump. History though proved everyone otherwise with the loss of
Hillary Clinton. Many analysts claim that the Democrats' loss of the presidency was due to FBI director, James Comey's letter, the media's ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, from the very first day, Post–ABC polling found that a majority of respondents didn't think Trump was qualified to be president. (Bump).
The problem is, that didn't keep people from voting for him. In national exit polling conducted after the election, 6–in–10 voters said they didn't think
Trump was qualified to be president. And yet one–fifth of those voters voted for him anyway. This only reinforces the fact that Clinton was not able to
connect with the typical Democratic constituents. If nearly 1–in–5 voters accepted Clinton's core argument about Trump but voted for him anyway then
Clinton's campaign was in deep trouble before Comey did anything. Whether or not Comey's letters was the deciding factor of the election isn't clear.
What's clear is that "Comey provides an easy excuse, deservedly or not"

Presidential Election Results
How Did Pollsters Get It Wrong?
On last November 8th, the results of presidential election were a surprise and shock to most people around the world, especially US residents because
they consistently projected Hillary Clinton would defeated Donald Trump. According to the article "Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump
Wins" in The New York Times, the total votes for Clinton were 62,391,335 (48%) and for Trump were 61,125,956 (47%). However, in contrast to
earlier predictions, some states elected to Trump instead of Clinton, and this result brought victory for Trump in the last hours of election day. In
details, Trump had 6 electoral votes from Iowa, 10 electoral votes from Wisconsin, 18 electoral votes from Ohio, 20 electoral votes... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
"There is a great deal of speculation but no clear answers as to the cause of the disconnect, but there is one point of agreement: Across the board,
polls underestimated Trump's level of support.", said Andrew Mercer, Claudia Deane and Kyley McGeeney authors on their article "Why 2016
election polls missed their mark" in Pew Research Center. They also gave some several possible explanations for the misstep. The first factor might
be what pollsters refer to as nonresponse bias. "Some groups, include the less educated voters who were a key demographic for Trump on Election
Day, are consistently hard for pollsters to reach." Then, the result would be a strongly pro–Trump segment of the population that simply did not show
up in the polls in proportion to their actual share of the population. The next factor was many of those who were polled simply were not honest
about whom they intended to vote for. The explanation for this factor was "support for Trump was socially undesirable, and that his supporters
were unwilling to admit their support to pollsters". In 1982, a similar case occurred in the gubernatorial election in California. Democrat Tom
Bradley, the black mayor of Los Angeles, lost to Republican George Deukmejian despite having been ahead in the polls even though the voters were
reluctant to tell interviewers that they were not going to vote for a black candidate. The third factor "involves the way pollsters identify likely voters.
Because we can't know in advance who is actually going to vote, pollsters develop models predicting who is going to vote and what the electorate
will look like on Election Day." This is a notoriously difficult task, and small differences in assumptions can produce sizable differences in election

Presidential Election Is Unprecedented
The upcoming Presidential Election is unlike any other. Two very different candidates with widely disparate political experience and personalities
square off against each other in a bitter, contentious battle. Neither candidate seems very popular or likeable, yet one of them will be sworn in as
President of the United States come January. In many ways this presidential election is unprecedented. The candidates from both parties are perceived
as extremely unfavorable. And, while the establishment candidate Hillary Clinton currently leads the race, more recent polls show that her lead over
her outsider opponent, reality television star and real estate magnate Donald Trump, is weakening. What is not unprecedented about this election,
however,

Presidential Elections Dbq
Television is an important educational tool in society, however, it does not have a place in presidential elections, due to the inequality and lack of
substantive discussion in televised debates, as well as irrelevant physical standards being placed upon presidential candidates. Journalists agree that
political debates are an ineffective method for deciding the leader of the country, and they are not worth the use oftelevision resources. Should the
decision of who is in charge of a massive country be made based on physical appearances, such as height, hairstyle and other superficial traits? Using
these methods of deduction to decide an elected official is extremely unintelligent and ineffective compared to the alternative, an intelligent interview
printed in an article or magazine. Citizens of a society are incredibly resistant to change, but examining journalists' opinions and articles proves that a
significant change must be made. The lack of substantive discussion in televised presidential debates largely contributes to the negative effect
television has had on presidential elections. Many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Television should be used for useful and informative programming, which is the complete opposite of an interview with Bill Clinton in 1992, in which
Clinton discusses, among other topics, his "underwear with the American people", therefore clearly providing an example of the ineffective and
off–topic discussions that occur on television (Source B). Conversations such as this interview, although slightly humorous, provide absolutely no
information about a candidate's policy positions or planned actions if elected. The members of a society, whether they decide to vote or not, should be
fully informed on these topics. Television is not providing an ample source for information due to the irrelevance of the discussions and the lack of
substantial information

Primaries In Presidential Elections
There are several different types of primaries in presidential elections that allow only specific candidates to move forward to the general elections.
Each primary accomplishes a different goal, which can range from establishing a favorite party to establishing a favorite candidate. After reviewing
the four main types of primary systems in the American Democratic system, the system that provides the most benefits is the open primary system. A
major benefit of the open primary system is that the voters are able to vote for their favorite candidate rather than their favorite party. A voter may not
always identify solely with one party or their views may not always closely resemble the views expressed by their established party. Therefore an open

The Presidential Election Elections Election
In the 2000 United States Presidential election, the close pre–election polls showed the election could be won by either the Republican or the Democrat
Party. Both Parties had two strong candidates, with a handful of other third party candidates, including Green Party and Reform Party representatives.
As I watched the results of the 2000 presidential election, I felt bad for Vice President Albert Gore, Jr. The Presidency seemed to be well within
Governor George W. Bush's grasp. The television news networks were showing a big lead for Bush across the country. I turned the television off in
my office, and I advised my Soldiers to get back to work. My Soldiers and I were stationed overseas in the Republic of Korea. We were thirteen
hours ahead of the Eastern Time zone in the United States. We worked for the Commanding General for all United States Troops in Korea. The
General often spoke about the election, but never let on which candidate got his vote. When I turned on the news at home that same evening, I was
shocked to learn the presidency had not been decided. It seemed Gore rebounded across the country; however the total vote count in some states is
too close to call. The 2000 Presidential election was important to me because the last time a Bush was in office, I found myself overseas as a part of
a Multinational Coalition as the United States had declared war on the country of Iraq. In the year 2000, the peninsula of Korea had been in a delicate
state with

Presidential Election Vs. Election
Fifteen years ago, President George Bush won the presidential election beating Al Gore, who had won the popular vote. This election is one of the
most contested in this century. The same election is also an example of the United States Electoral College voting system in action. The Electoral
College permits a candidate to win a presidential election without winning the popular vote. The American campaign and election system can be
broken down into three significant parts, the nomination, the campaign, and the election. Each portion of the campaign and election system is distinct
from the other, but have some similarities. Prior to running in the national presidential election, the candidate must win the party nomination. The
nomination ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to nomination issues, there are campaign fund issues. As described by Paul Steinhauser and Robert Yoon's article, "Cost to Win
Congressional Election Skyrockets," for CNN, the cost to win congressional elections is rising steeply. Steinhauser and Yoon explain that on average
it costs $1.6 million to win a House seat, which, after accounting for inflation, is 344% more than in 1986. Steinhauser and Yoon also emphasize that
in the House of Representatives, incumbents outspend their challengers by an average ratio of $3 for every $1 the challenger spends. Senate
incumbents on average outspend their challengers by $3.5 million. The authors also explain that in 2012 outside groups spent $457 million on
congressional elections. An outside group could be a group or individual, for example a PAC (Political Action Committee) or a wealthy individual.
Ashley Parker relates her article, "Outside Money Drives a Deluge of Political Ads," in The New York Times to the influx in spending by outside
groups. She explains that political spending for advertising is increasing rapidly compared to past elections. Parker also emphasizes that outside groups
buy more advertisement time than the candidates themselves. She concludes her article by emphasizing that soon enough political advertisements are
going to start airing on TV right after November elections, this is some two years before the next vote. Equally important

The Presidential Election Of 1912
The presidential election of 1912 was fought amongst four major candidates. Woodrow Wilson was brought up by his father, a Presbyterian minister,
and his mother, daughter of a Presbyterian minister brought up Woodrow Wilson. He was president of Princeton University and governor of New
Jersey. He represented the Democratic Party and had a combination of high morality and high–minded detachment. Eugene Debs was a well–known
Socialist and union man for the Fireman's Brotherhood and American Railroad. He was never interested in the complex economic and political theories
but in the dignity and humanity of the average worker. Another candidate wasTheodore Roosevelt who revolted from the Republican Party and helped
form and led the Progressive Party. He was brought up by a moderately wealthy family and ended up being governor of New York. Our final candidate
was William Howard Taftwho's "first love was always the law, and his highest aspiration to serve as chief justice, not as president" and a close friend
to Theodore Roosevelt. Taft was also representing the Republican Party. One issue that would have been important to me if I were a voter in1912
would have been Women's Suffrage. Many men and women believed that men were "fundamentally different" and that women should stay out of
politics because its just a "man's world". Others argued that it was time for women to come out of the shadows of men and prove that they, too, can
help their country and other residents with

Social Media In Presidential Elections
Throughout history, presidential candidates have capitalized to newspapers, radio, television and now social media to inform about the campaign
proposals. In the middle of the Digital Age, social media platforms such Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn performed an important role during
the US presidential elections 2016.
President–elect of the United States, Donald Trump made social networks his main means of contact with the US and foreign population during his
campaign. However, his contact with mass media is no recent. In 2003 the American businessman became the executive producer and host of the NBC
reality show The Apprentice.
Since Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency last June 16, 2015; many people began to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People felt more related because platforms such Facebook and Twitter are more interactive than broadcasting. For example, last February 17; Trump
tweet "Interesting how President Obama so haltingly said I "would never be president" – This from perhaps the worst president in U.S. history!" this
tweet had 22,755 likes and 9,056 retweets. The On the other hand, The New York Times published that Donald Trump earned close to $2 billion worth
of worth of free media. The TV program "Meet the Press" of the NBC television network experienced the highest ratings during interviews to Donald
Trump.
Many people have called this process "Social Media Election" for the impact that this technological tool gendered in the United States and other
countries. People from all over the world could see the presidential debates, visits of the candidates to the different states and exclusive interviews live
through Facebook. In addition, the repetitions of these events circulated in Facebook during weeks, people could comment and share the information in
their own profiles. Students from the Political Communication class at John Brown University realized a simulation of a campaign to bring people
voting and observing how students responses to the

2016 Presidential Election
Many American's were surprised with the results of the 2016 Presidential Election. With Clinton predicted to win with more than seventy percent of the
votes, so many Americans were upset or troubled to wake up to Donald Trump as their new president–elect. After the results of the election, violence
has broken out throughout the country, mainly targeted at minorities. With the country in an uproar, one may think, how does this sort of situation
happen? One could blame the media for this lack of information or surprise outcome of the election. The media has changed this election from the way
we view our candidates to who we predicted to win through social media, journalistic bias and people's internal filter.
Social media affected the preexisting ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The 2016 election has been the first election where social media has been a key player to how people got their information. Statistics say "44 percent
of American adults said they had learned something new in the past week about the election from social media." However, with social media such an
important influence on the younger generation it is important for all of this information to be legitimate and truthful. Google and Facebook have
recently changed their policies to try to stop fake news articles from popping up within their ad space. The spread of fake news articles skews the
public's perception of the candidates. The guardian talks about how the American voter is not just one demographic (college educated individuals,
white men, minorities etc. ) because of this lack of (straightforward), it's hard to get an accurate prediction on who would have won the election.
Additionally, the media affected the election negatively because they did not give the general public enough information to understand the statistics
that they were

2016 Presidential Election Analysis
The 2016 election was one of the most interesting, and strange presidential elections in history. For the democrats they had leading nominee Hillary
Clinton who was a former Secretary of State, and on the republican side they had a very wealthy real estate nominee named Donald Trump. The voting
behavior throughout this election stayed similar to years past, and accordingly fifty–eight percent of eligible voters hit the polls. With that being said
there were similar demographic groups voting for the same political parties. The demographic groups which played a significant role was the White
Evangelical Christian which partake in the religion spectrum. Next is the wealthier families that received anywhere from fifty–thousand to one–hundred
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The African American group has leaned towards the democratic vote since John F Kennedy and Lyndon B Johnson, this extreme change of voting
occurred during the Civil Rights movement when both of these men were "outlawing public discrimination, and garnering 94% of the black vote"
(University of California, 1). This demographic group is rapidly growing due to the fact that it is an ethnicity, and that they have always voted
democrat for the beliefs and role the democrats have played in order to better the specific race. The 2016 election proved once again to be a great
success for the democrats when it came time for the African American support, this is shown through the astounding eighty–eight percent vote for
Hillary Clinton. The African American vote is a very crucial poll that the democrats rely on, due to the decrease in percentage from the 2012 election
(Obama) at ninety–three percent to Hillary's poll numbers at eighty–eight percent from the same demographic group. The factor of the Civil Rights
movements that shaped the world we live in today is a huge factor on why the African American ethnicity will always lean towards the democratic
view. Without that major factor all of the electoral votes would be very different, and would look as if they would always lean more towards a liberal
or republican view. The final demographic group in the list is the income groups, especially the

U.s. Presidential Election Elections Essay
In due course of the most recent decade, there has been a significant surge in American independent voters. It is of verifiable significance to put into
thought the effects of these voters, especially, since the United States (U.S.) currently undergone its ' eagerly awaited 2016 Presidential General Election
. It is with relevance to presidential elections that we have seen a political surge on American independent voters and thus having political candidates
attempt to sway their view, we have seen fundamental compelling percentages on these election outcomes.
This case study crafts the breakdown of potential variables that have prompted to the sharp ascent in American independent voters in previous political
history, and the voting behavior to authentic elements adding to Independent voters ' decisions. Specifically, to what extent do factors shape the voting
behavior on the increasing rise of the American Independent voter choice and voter turnout in the 2016 United States Presidential Election? By
extension, how do independents differ in part from the two major partisan ties of the Democratic and Republican parties?
As per the United States voting framework, an independent voter is a non–fanatic electorate who is not subsidiary with a specific political gathering.
Independents can either be immaculate or inclining. Inclining Independents tend to vote for the gathering they incline more towards along these lines
they are mostly divided in that sense. Immaculate

Presidential Election : Presidential Elections
The 2016 presidential election may happen to be one of the most memorable elections to have ever been. From the campaign speeches, to the
Democratic and Republican National conventions, and even the presidential debates; Americans seemed to constantly be voicing their opinions on
every aspect of the election, and who they believe is the more suitable candidate for president, especially on social media. The 2016 presidential
election marks one of the more recent elections where we start to see social media's impact on it. We see how presidential candidates use social media
as a platform to voice about updates on their campaign as well as communicate with their supporters. With the continue rise in the number of social
media users as well as politicians now using social media, how much has its impact had on elections and Americans outlook on the campaign.
According to textbook 'Communication Theory', metatheory is the stated or inherent assumptions made when creating a theory. If you aren't familiar
with a theory's underlying assumptions about truth, human nature, the purpose of the theory, and its values, then a person can't fully understand a
theory. We'll see the studies of people who have implied metatheory on whether or not social media has had an effect on presidential elections. We
start to see social media's trans figurative impact back in the 2008 presidential election. J. Gregory concluded in his article 'Impact of Social Media in
2012 Presidential Election'

Twitter In Presidential Elections
The introduction of media has significantly impacted the way candidates campaign during the United States presidential debate cycles. While
mainstream media outlets (i.e. televised newscasts, radio broadcasts) have played an important role in providing live coverage of events in which
candidates spoke about their platforms, the purpose of the media was completely altered with the introduction of social media, specifically Twitter.
While journalism was meant to be an unbiased practice, Twitter and other social media sites have taken on the role of a biased news source, forever
changing presidential elections in the process.
Founded in 2006, Twitter quickly became a prominent figure in the social media sphere, boasting more than 310 million... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While there has been a lot of negative feedback from the results of the election, both campaigns should see social media platforms, particularly Twitter,
as a catalyst for future change. The use of social media during the 2016 election has granted several candidates, not just the major party candidates,
plenty of media exposure to a differentiated group of voters. Additionally, social media grants candidates more time to directly communicate with
voters on issues that they are particularly passionate about. Furthermore, candidates have the opportunity to use feedback from social media sites to
predict future winners of the popular vote well before the election. The millennial demographic has not held back with their opinions on issues and the
results of the election; therefore, candidates and their campaign teams should take social media and the information it provides into serious
consideration when partaking in such large–scale

Presidential Election Advantages
I believe that the US Presidential election should deserve all the media attention it is receiving because the USA is one of the strongest world
economies and will have a massive influence on other country's economies. The US politics are known to be very complex. Even though we're
inundated with the media coverage of this election, it can still be difficult to figure out what exactly is happening. In 2014 it was stated that more and
more americans are using cell phones to follow political news with 28 percent of registered voters. In other words, people are following election news
and development in which this can help them understand more of the US politics from looking at social media sites and blogs. As every economic
situation in the world

Presidential Elections And Election Elections
Political elections, especially presidential elections have many variables that influence the voters when they go to the polls. Many researchers use
various methods to figure out all the possible outcomes of the election and what the voters are looking for in a particular year. This year has been
unique because of the different personalities that the candidates own. This new diversity has caused researchers to revise their tactics from earlier
years. Also, negative political ads for this election year have had some impact on voters. Furthermore, a candidate's religious affiliation will also have an
effect on different segments of the population. Finally, in previous presidential elections, divided parties rarely won presidential elections. Will this year
have the same end result? Finally, the exact effects caused by these variables can sometimes only be determined byresearch studies. These studies have
to be ready to hit the core of the issue affecting the outcome. Furthermore, the questions have to be tailored, balanced and presented the same way in all
outlets.
Multitude of Media Outlets
Voting for the next President of the United States is very important in our country. In our society today voters want to know if the next President will
solve the issues that effects them and how well will he or she keep this country moving forward. Voters have more media outlets now than ever before
when trying to decide who they want to support as a leading candidate to run for

The Importance Of Presidential Elections
The most important and popularized moment in American Political verve is the presidential election process. As Nathan Myhrvold once said,
"Elections, for their part, are typically popularity contests rather than measures of candidates' relative competency or effectiveness. Imagine if scientific
truth were determined according to which scientist was most popular. To be successful, scientists would have to be charismatic and attractive– and
human knowledge would suffer terribly". Because politics are so far from the average American Joe, the virtue of elections has lost its way into a high
school class election where the jock wins over the head cheerleader. Evidently, Americans are now encouraged if not obliged to take part of a natural
right, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . did not fairly represent the views of the party members throughout the nation" (Text, 393). This was when the people began to take note that this
process was unfair and that they should add a step so that everyone was at least content with the nominees. The State's party leaders would
generally decide who would be selected. The role of the political party conventions, as demonstrated in both the 2012 and 2016 elections,
demonstrated a close merger between both candidates' votes, nonetheless the electoral votes were more significant for Barack Obama. As the same
story told for Donald Trump, however he had a greater gap of indifference of the general population due to his shameful campaign. Money is a huge
deal when it comes to campaigns. We all have received that one annoying call, where someone is trying to persuade you to demonstrate support
(monetary because moral support isn't what pays the bills) for a specific candidate. For the most part, they occupy this money for TV commercials, or
traveling expenses, maybe even a speech writer because they hated English in college. Candidates, or their teams, take careful inspection of their
expenses because money does not grow on trees and they are again trying to persuade America that they are good enough to become

Presentation Of The Presidential Election
Team #2
Collaborative Session#1
Task A:
Tuesday, November 8, 2016 will be the 58 quadrennial US presidential election. Over the last 58 elections, never has there been a more controversial
topic to speaks about. From the issues that are being debated about, to the Presidential candidates themselves. This year 's' Presidential race has been
closely monitored by people from all different demographics. The issues debated will not only have an impact on the United States, but they will have
an even bigger impact on other countries all over the world. An estimated 50 million people are projected to vote on November 8, 2016, and 58% of
Americans between the ages of 18–24 will be voting in this year 's election. These number can play a huge part in determining who will be the next
President of the United States. There are four primary candidates for the 2016 Presidential election are, but only two of them are gaining so much
attention. Never has there been an electoral race that contains so much dislike for the top nominees. The race between Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump has caused many Americans to question whether or not they should vote with their party, or to start looking into other candidates who they
might view as a better fit for President. Millennials in particular have been really outspoken about the subject. According to an article in fortune.com "
Millennials gave Clinton less than 30% of their votes in key primaries, and 25% of young Republicans say they will vote

Presidential Election Vs. Presidential Elections
As we approach the final day of the US election, polls show vantage for Clinton, the representative of the democrat party over Trump, the
representative of the republic party so far. FiveThirtyEight, Nate Silver 's predictions and polling data for the 2016 presidential election between
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, tells, 49.2% of the popular vote goes for Clinton and 44.5% of the popular vote goes for Trump. These popular
votes conducted in November 2, 2016. Clinton and Trump are the only candidates who remained in the race in the final stages representing their parties
after the other candidates lost chances in competition. They have completed all the three presidential election debates and they are about 1 week away
from the final day of the US election. There are few states remained undecided about the future president. The undecided and changing states are the
ones which will determine the wining candidate in the final day of the elections. My prediction for the US election result is that Clinton is going to
win the race. The factors shape the election results are the campaign events, tactics and the media influence. In this paper, I am going to discuss how
these two factors are contributing in Clinton campaign then I will propose a strategy for Trump to help him wining the race. Both candidates had
different career route and political life. ("Hillary ...") Clinton earned a low degree. She served as a first lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. She
also

Manipulation In Presidential Elections
If voters were to review past presidential candidates' advertisements, they would be guaranteed to come across instances where someone's words were
twisted and turned against them by their opposing party. This is a classic use of manipulation to make oneself appear to be the "good–guy." Hence, it
is not surprising that this has not changed in the 2016 election. However, what has changed is that there is a woman running for president–she's
cunning, but her arguments are distorted. With clips of girls evaluating their figures while playing interviews with harsh words, Clinton asks, "Is this
the president we want for our daughters?" In one of her new ads, "Mirrors," Hillary Clinton follows suit and manipulates potential voters into a
prejudiced opinion of Donald Trump by taking his words out of context to exploit him.
In light of election day soon approaching, Clinton releases a critical advertisement to air in undecided states: the ad uses juxtaposition to craft an
unflattering idea of Trump in her attempt to sway voters towards the Democratic party. The advertisement is composed of snippets of girls of all ages,
ethnicities, and builds analyzing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Lusher quotes past interviews with Trump giving less–than–respectable remarks about specific women such as: "fat" and "ugly" about
Rosie O'Donnell, as well as, "She's a slob. She ate like a pig." However, Clinton does not include specific names of who Trump was talking about,
implying that his words are a general idea of women. Though, it becomes clear that the origin of these statements had nothing to do with women as a
general populace, if voters do their research. Which is something Clinton assumes voters will not do, hence underestimating their intelligence.
Nonetheless, the Democratic candidate is relying on her schemes to mold a crooked idea of Trump for impending voters to gain

Introduction During the US presidential election of 2016, the world has witnessed an abundance of unprecedented phenomena. From the nomination of
the first woman candidate from a major political party to the nomination of first billionaire reality TV star, the election cycle has produced moments
that would have been unimaginable a year or two ago. While the media is gleeful to cover the horserace aspect of the election, the question that political
scientists are interested is what factors motivates American voters to prefer one candidate over another. Political pundits from both sides have cited
identity politics, the personal characters of the candidates and the national and personal economic conditions to support or oppose Donald Trump or
Hillary Clinton. The personal qualities of Trump and Clinton made them most unpopular presidential nominees of the modern era. Both candidates
have alienated different groups of voters while attracting others. Both of them have proposed two distinct paths for America 's future with different
fiscal, domestic and international policies. When making their decision, the voters are evaluating all of these factors to choose the best match candidate
for them. Like any other political phenomenon, voting intentions in this election have multiple agents, but I will argue that while group identities, the
economics and the qualities of the candidates all influences voters' intentions, the economic interest of a person has the best correlation with

The United States presidential election of 1984 was the 50th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 6, 1984. The
presidential race was between the incumbent Republican candidate, President Ronald Reagan, and former Vice President Democratic candidate, Walter
Mondale. Reagan was helped in the election by a strong economic recovery from the deep recession of 1981–1982. Reagan carried 49 of the 50 states,
becoming only the second presidential candidate to do so after Richard Nixon 's victory in the 1972 presidential election. Mondale 's only electoral
votes came from the District of Columbia, which has always been considered a Democratic guarantee, and his home state of Minnesota–which he won
by a mere 3761 votes, meaning Reagan came within 3800 votes of winning all fifty states. Reagan 's 525 electoral votes (out of 538) is the highest total
ever received by a presidential candidate. Mondale 's 13 electoral votes is also the 2nd–fewest ever received by a second–place candidate, second only
to lf Landon 's 8 in 1936. In the national popular vote, Reagan received 58.8% to Mondale 's 40.6% (2016, 270towin.com)
For a long period, candidates running for President of the United States often have what's called a campaign strategy to help attract voters' attention. The
more voters they attracted, more likely those voters would choose them as their president elect. Technology has played a key role in doing that for past
elections and current ones. During

Democratic Election : Presidential Election
In this Presidential Election, the Republican Party is a disadvantage in Florida due to the large concentrations of voters in major cities. The majority
of the state votes for the Republican candidate, but big cities like Miami, Orlando, and Tampa always seem to vote for the Democratic candidate. In
the 2012 election between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, Mitt Romney won all but thirteen counties but lost in majorly in the urban areas where
Barack Obama won an astonishing number of the votes. For Donald Trump to stand a chance, he must focus on the rural cities with a large number of
Conservative and Independent voters and has a low voter turnout.
The number one county Donald Trump must focus on is Sarasota County. Even with almost one hundred and twenty thousand registered republican
voters during the 2012 election, Romney still only was able to carry fifty–two percent of the votes in that county. This is a very populated county filled
with republican voters who have a low turnout rate in previous elections. Money should be pumped into Sarasota to help increase voter turnout for the
Trump Pence campaign. With a large push to get Republican voters to come out and vote Donald could win a bunch of solid votes to offset some of
the counties he will struggle in.
The largest group of counties that should be focused on are the counties of; Collier, Martin, Indian River, Escambia, Lake, Highlands, Citrus, Marion,
Manatee, Charlotte and Lee. Like Sarasota County, these counties have

Lack Of Funding For Presidential Elections
With the upcoming presidential election, it has been interesting to learn about things as they are actually happening in our country today. Among the
many issues that surround the race to the office, financing the presidential election seems to be a major topic that is always in the public eye. There
are many different views on how the election should be financed but it is hard to tell how far government funding and donations can go before
democracy is left behind.
After President Nixon and the Watergate controversy in 1971, the United States began to put limits on how much a candidate could receive and spend
within a campaign. In order to enforce fairness between candidates, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rather than government providing millions of dollars for the campaign and putting harsh restricts on individual donations, I believe that the limits
should not be put on the American people but on the candidates themselves. Spending on the campaign has gotten out of control within the last decade.
Millions of taxpayer dollars are being spend on mobile campaigns, advertisements, and media exposure. This funding could easily go towards other
areas of society, benefiting the very people that the candidates wish to govern. Rather than directing negative attention, I believe that candidates should
reach out to the public to gain support. Campaigning for presidency should not be about winning or who raises the most money. Presidency should be
about protecting and caring for the American people. The conduct of campaigns should be monitored in order to limit spending and to prevent negative
advertising towards opposite candidates.
Candidates running for office should depend less on government funding and turn towards the public for their support. Rather then concerning
ourselves with prohibiting the use of soft money we should control the amount of taxpayers' dollars that are being spent. How can we claim that the
use of soft money goes against Democracy when we allow our government to fund

The Election Of Presidential Election
As election season draws closer, we see the candidates debate more and more. These debates are a huge part in the elections, but, there is another
debate that has had the hot seat since the 2000 election of Gore and Bush. In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore won the popular vote across the
United States, but, more controversy was created by the Republican candidate George W. Bushwinning the presidential election because he surpassed
the 270 electoral votes needed to win. An outcry arose from all across the country saying that the people's voices are not heard through the Electoral
College and that a true democratic country would allow for direct election of the President. So why did the founding fathers not allow a direct
election? And why hasn't the Electoral College been reformed yet if it is so bad? The answers are simple. Our founding fathers didn't allow for a
direct election because they were afraid that the voters would be not well enough informed about the candidates, a reform to the Electoral College
would mean a new amendment to the constitution, and because in all actuality, the Electoral College helps keep little states involved with the elections.
With today's technology and social media, the way candidates can reach voters far surpass that of how candidates had to reach voters in the 19th
century. So more voters should be better informed than that of voters in the 19th century; right? Although this is a very true statement and that the
information about

Presidential Election : Presidential Candidates Essay
Language is a significant component for presidential candidates to win the votes of citizens. The way a person communicates or articulates his or her
views can be an essential factor for people to determine whether the individual is the right person to lead a nation. Politicians must choose their words
carefully and wisely to express their issues if they intend for people to trust them. The power of words is immense since it can greatly influence
people. In the past few years, the United States has seen numerous of worrisome issues in which Americans are conscientiously analyzing and deciding
which presidential candidate should be the next president in this year's election. Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald
Trump use various of ways to gain support. The language each candidate uses has effectively assisted the candidates in earning their respective voters.
With the explanatory and argumentative methods of Hillary Clinton, she is able to interact with her voters efficiently while Donald Trump uses
simplistic yet hyperbolic language to attract Americans who share a common ideology with him. Throughout Hillary Clinton's speeches and debates,
she been methodical in using her words by preserving a positive tone while communicating facts to support her ideas. For instance, in Hillary Clinton's
acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention, her language was generally positive. Clinton explains how the country is fundamentally in a
well–off place.

1860 Presidential Election

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Maritza Tyson

More from Maritza Tyson (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

1860 Presidential Election