Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment Elevator Consult Assig.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment: Elevator Consult Assignment Total available points =10Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Oral PresentationPresentation was not concise or orderly by systems and did not included an HPI, pertinent finding on exam or, suggested plan of care. Extraneous information was included.Presentation was not concise, was not orderly by systems and included an incomplete HPI, incomplete pertinent finding on exam and an incomplete suggested plan of care. Extraneous information was included.Presentation was concise, but was not orderly by systems and included an incomplete HPI, incomplete pertinent finding on exam and an incomplete suggested plan of care. No extraneous information was included.Presentation was concise, orderly by systems and included HPI, pertinent finding on exam, suggested plan of care. No extraneous information was included. 490%3.60APA format with supporting evidence based resources less than 3 years old.Did not follow APA formatMajor errors with APA formattingText, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errorsText, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work.410%0.40Final Score10Percentage100%Feedback: .
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric. .docx
Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Develop a patient-focused evidence based management plan for this patient.There is no mention of a management plan for this patient.The management plan is partially developed but not based on evidenceThe management plan is mostly developed but the evidence base is not strong The management plan is evidence based and completely developed16%0.00Pertinent DiagnosticsThere is no evidence of any diagnosticsDiagnostic tests poorly addressedDiagnostics partially addressedDiagnostics thoroughly addressed15%0.00Prepare a detailed, comprehensive, patient-centered education plan.There is no mention of an education plan The education plan is included but it is provider-centered vs patient-centeredThe education plan is included and is patient-centered but incompleteThe education plan is included and is patient-centered and complete16%0.00Cultural and lifestyle considerationsThere is no mention cultural and lifestyle considerationsContent poorly addressedContent addressed but more detail is needed or content inconclusive Cultural and lifestyle considerations thoroughly addressed15%0.00Information on health promotion or health care maintenace needsTher is no mention Content poorly addressedHealth promotion or health care mainHealth promotion or health care maintenance needs thoroughly addressed12%0.00Describe the developmental educational strategies you will use with this patientThere is no mention of development educational strategies for this education planThere is some mention of developmental educational strategies but they are not appropriate for the patient’s age and developmental levelThe educational strategies are identified and described to great extent but not completelyThe educational strategies are well-identified and thoroughly described 12%0.00Describe the follow-up with specific time lines for this patient. For example, when should he return to the clinic for his next visit?There is no mention of follow-up for this patientThere is some description for the follow up for this patient but there is not a specific time line identifiedThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient but it is not supported with evidence-based clinical guidelinesThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient and it is well-supported with evidence-based clinical guidelines14%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions)IntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject v.
Freeman-Brown Private School Case Study 1Unsatisfactory0.0.docx
Freeman-Brown Private School Case Study
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Freeman-Brown Private School (FBPS) as an Open System and Complex Adaptive System
Evaluation of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of FBPS as an open system or as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is vague or incomplete. Presentation of facts to support whether FBPS was effective as an open system or as a complex adaptive system is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is provided, but at a cursory level. Rudimentary evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is clear and well integrated Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is definitive and detailed. A thorough evaluation of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system, including examples and insights that further understanding, is provided. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
10.0 %Organizational Culture and Climate at FBPS
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of either the organizational culture or the organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is vague or incomplete. Evaluation of the climate or culture at FBPS is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is provided, but at a cursory level. Rudimentary evaluation of the climate and culture at FBPS may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is clear and well integrated. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is methodical and detailed. A comprehensive evaluation of both the organizational culture and climate at FBPS, including examples and insights to further u ...
112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
Course: 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D)
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Article
Content
/ 50
Organization
of the Article
Content
/ 20
50 points
Information in
the article is
comprehensive,
accurate, and
relevant, includes
details to add
interest, provide
examples, and
demonstrate
objective, critical
thinking.
45 points
Information in
the article is
accurate and
relevant, includes
adequate details
and examples,
and
demonstrated
objective, critical
thinking.
35 points
Information in
the article is
limited, but
accurate and
relevant, includes
minimal details
and examples,
and
demonstrates
some objective,
critical thinking.
30 points
Information in
the article does
not meet minimal
criteria for
accuracy, detail,
or demonstration
of critical
thinking.
20 points
The article is
organized
professionally
and effectively
and or creatively
with inclusion of
the following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
18 points
The article is
organized with
inclusion of the
following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
16 points
The article shows
an effort to be
organized, but
has some
disorganization
in the following
areas:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
14 points
The article is
disorganized or
lacks cohesion,
flow, and
proportion in the
following areas.
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Total / 100
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 20
APA / 10
20 points
The article is
written
professionally
and exhibits
excellent
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
18 points
The article is
written
competently and
evidences
proficient
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
...
112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
Course: 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D)
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Article
Content
/ 50
Organization
of the Article
Content
/ 20
50 points
Information in
the article is
comprehensive,
accurate, and
relevant, includes
details to add
interest, provide
examples, and
demonstrate
objective, critical
thinking.
45 points
Information in
the article is
accurate and
relevant, includes
adequate details
and examples,
and
demonstrated
objective, critical
thinking.
35 points
Information in
the article is
limited, but
accurate and
relevant, includes
minimal details
and examples,
and
demonstrates
some objective,
critical thinking.
30 points
Information in
the article does
not meet minimal
criteria for
accuracy, detail,
or demonstration
of critical
thinking.
20 points
The article is
organized
professionally
and effectively
and or creatively
with inclusion of
the following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
18 points
The article is
organized with
inclusion of the
following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
16 points
The article shows
an effort to be
organized, but
has some
disorganization
in the following
areas:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
14 points
The article is
disorganized or
lacks cohesion,
flow, and
proportion in the
following areas.
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Total / 100
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 20
APA / 10
20 points
The article is
written
professionally
and exhibits
excellent
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
18 points
The article is
written
competently and
evidences
proficient
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
...
Assignment RubricUnit 9 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
Assignment RubricUnit 9 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =80Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Content QualitySubmission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts.Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts.90%0.00ResourcesDoes not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1).Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources.Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources.Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources.10%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper has some good information o ...
Rubic print format_course codeclass codeassignment titletotal point
This document provides grading criteria for an executive summary assignment in an nursing course. It outlines 8 content areas that will be evaluated, including the purpose of the quality improvement initiative, target population, benefits, required collaboration, cost justification, evaluation basis, organization/format, and documentation of sources. Specific point values and quality descriptions are provided for "unsatisfactory" to "excellent" work in each criteria area. A second rubric evaluates assignments based on inclusion of required components, depth of content and analysis, quality of sources, and mechanics of writing.
My Topic is State 3 methods of Transmitting HIV and 3 methods by w
My Topic is : State 3 methods of Transmitting HIV and 3 methods by which the virus is not transmitted.
The topics come from Chapters 5 and 7. Chapter 6 talks about infection and you should apply what you learned from Chapter 6 to your topic as well. You may use the textbook ( Gould's Pathophysiology for the Health Professions, 6th edition) as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, additional references should be scholarly based and be a new source that you are introducing to your peers. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docx
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Recommended
Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric. .docx
Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Develop a patient-focused evidence based management plan for this patient.There is no mention of a management plan for this patient.The management plan is partially developed but not based on evidenceThe management plan is mostly developed but the evidence base is not strong The management plan is evidence based and completely developed16%0.00Pertinent DiagnosticsThere is no evidence of any diagnosticsDiagnostic tests poorly addressedDiagnostics partially addressedDiagnostics thoroughly addressed15%0.00Prepare a detailed, comprehensive, patient-centered education plan.There is no mention of an education plan The education plan is included but it is provider-centered vs patient-centeredThe education plan is included and is patient-centered but incompleteThe education plan is included and is patient-centered and complete16%0.00Cultural and lifestyle considerationsThere is no mention cultural and lifestyle considerationsContent poorly addressedContent addressed but more detail is needed or content inconclusive Cultural and lifestyle considerations thoroughly addressed15%0.00Information on health promotion or health care maintenace needsTher is no mention Content poorly addressedHealth promotion or health care mainHealth promotion or health care maintenance needs thoroughly addressed12%0.00Describe the developmental educational strategies you will use with this patientThere is no mention of development educational strategies for this education planThere is some mention of developmental educational strategies but they are not appropriate for the patient’s age and developmental levelThe educational strategies are identified and described to great extent but not completelyThe educational strategies are well-identified and thoroughly described 12%0.00Describe the follow-up with specific time lines for this patient. For example, when should he return to the clinic for his next visit?There is no mention of follow-up for this patientThere is some description for the follow up for this patient but there is not a specific time line identifiedThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient but it is not supported with evidence-based clinical guidelinesThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient and it is well-supported with evidence-based clinical guidelines14%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions)IntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject v.
Freeman-Brown Private School Case Study 1Unsatisfactory0.0.docx
Freeman-Brown Private School Case Study
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Freeman-Brown Private School (FBPS) as an Open System and Complex Adaptive System
Evaluation of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of FBPS as an open system or as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is vague or incomplete. Presentation of facts to support whether FBPS was effective as an open system or as a complex adaptive system is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is provided, but at a cursory level. Rudimentary evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is clear and well integrated Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system during the time of the campus closures is definitive and detailed. A thorough evaluation of FBPS as an open system and as a complex adaptive system, including examples and insights that further understanding, is provided. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
10.0 %Organizational Culture and Climate at FBPS
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of either the organizational culture or the organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is vague or incomplete. Evaluation of the climate or culture at FBPS is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is provided, but at a cursory level. Rudimentary evaluation of the climate and culture at FBPS may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is clear and well integrated. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.
Evaluation of the organizational culture and organizational climate within FBPS during the time of the closures is methodical and detailed. A comprehensive evaluation of both the organizational culture and climate at FBPS, including examples and insights to further u ...
112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
Course: 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D)
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Article
Content
/ 50
Organization
of the Article
Content
/ 20
50 points
Information in
the article is
comprehensive,
accurate, and
relevant, includes
details to add
interest, provide
examples, and
demonstrate
objective, critical
thinking.
45 points
Information in
the article is
accurate and
relevant, includes
adequate details
and examples,
and
demonstrated
objective, critical
thinking.
35 points
Information in
the article is
limited, but
accurate and
relevant, includes
minimal details
and examples,
and
demonstrates
some objective,
critical thinking.
30 points
Information in
the article does
not meet minimal
criteria for
accuracy, detail,
or demonstration
of critical
thinking.
20 points
The article is
organized
professionally
and effectively
and or creatively
with inclusion of
the following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
18 points
The article is
organized with
inclusion of the
following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
16 points
The article shows
an effort to be
organized, but
has some
disorganization
in the following
areas:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
14 points
The article is
disorganized or
lacks cohesion,
flow, and
proportion in the
following areas.
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Total / 100
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 20
APA / 10
20 points
The article is
written
professionally
and exhibits
excellent
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
18 points
The article is
written
competently and
evidences
proficient
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
...
112921, 349 PM Preview Rubric 4.27.2 Article (100 points)
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
4.2/7.2 Article (100 points)
Course: 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D)
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Article
Content
/ 50
Organization
of the Article
Content
/ 20
50 points
Information in
the article is
comprehensive,
accurate, and
relevant, includes
details to add
interest, provide
examples, and
demonstrate
objective, critical
thinking.
45 points
Information in
the article is
accurate and
relevant, includes
adequate details
and examples,
and
demonstrated
objective, critical
thinking.
35 points
Information in
the article is
limited, but
accurate and
relevant, includes
minimal details
and examples,
and
demonstrates
some objective,
critical thinking.
30 points
Information in
the article does
not meet minimal
criteria for
accuracy, detail,
or demonstration
of critical
thinking.
20 points
The article is
organized
professionally
and effectively
and or creatively
with inclusion of
the following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
18 points
The article is
organized with
inclusion of the
following:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
16 points
The article shows
an effort to be
organized, but
has some
disorganization
in the following
areas:
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
14 points
The article is
disorganized or
lacks cohesion,
flow, and
proportion in the
following areas.
Clear main idea.
Logical sequence
of topics.
Balanced
partition of
topics.
Use of
transitions and
summaries.
11/29/21, 3:49 PM Preview Rubric: 4.2/7.2 Article (100 points) - 3FA2021 Craft Academic Writing for Bus (BADM-700-01D) - Indiana Wesleyan University
https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=154830&rubricId=471972&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Total / 100
Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicatio
n
/ 20
APA / 10
20 points
The article is
written
professionally
and exhibits
excellent
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
critical thinking.
18 points
The article is
written
competently and
evidences
proficient
communication
when applying
English Grammar
Standards and
the 7 C's of
writing: clear,
concise,
complete,
correct,
correlated to the
research,
creative, and
...
Assignment RubricUnit 9 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
Assignment RubricUnit 9 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =80Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Content QualitySubmission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts.Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts.90%0.00ResourcesDoes not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1).Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources.Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources.Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources.10%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper has some good information o ...
Rubic print format_course codeclass codeassignment titletotal point
This document provides grading criteria for an executive summary assignment in an nursing course. It outlines 8 content areas that will be evaluated, including the purpose of the quality improvement initiative, target population, benefits, required collaboration, cost justification, evaluation basis, organization/format, and documentation of sources. Specific point values and quality descriptions are provided for "unsatisfactory" to "excellent" work in each criteria area. A second rubric evaluates assignments based on inclusion of required components, depth of content and analysis, quality of sources, and mechanics of writing.
My Topic is State 3 methods of Transmitting HIV and 3 methods by w
My Topic is : State 3 methods of Transmitting HIV and 3 methods by which the virus is not transmitted.
The topics come from Chapters 5 and 7. Chapter 6 talks about infection and you should apply what you learned from Chapter 6 to your topic as well. You may use the textbook ( Gould's Pathophysiology for the Health Professions, 6th edition) as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, additional references should be scholarly based and be a new source that you are introducing to your peers. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docx
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docx
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripheral systems
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Schol ...
Writing Assignment RubricNote Scholarly resources are defined a.docx
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of the paper being summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development.
Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Only uses scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
23 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Use of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Content of paper is inaccurately portrayed or missing.
Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Does not use scholarly resources.
Missing some instruction requirements.
20 points
30
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning
Through critical analysis, the submitted paper provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content.
Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
Paper is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course conten.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1
Understanding the Problem
Value:
10%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background:
The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.
Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.
The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.
Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.
*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.
Complete the Following
You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.
Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.
You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:
Problem
Capabilities
Benefits
Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lec
turer in the class or by notification in the subject site.
Rationale
This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
the context of an information system;
the processes in systems analysis;
the approaches in systems analysis
Marking criteria
Level Attained
Criteria
STANDARDS
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
1. Content of the Vision Document
Maximum
4 Marks
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Ethical C.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docx
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %E ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Heal.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Health Organization Case Study200.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade30.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is not provided.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions. Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is offered in detail.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is not provided.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated by the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is not offered.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing mee.
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
Description Total Possible Score 30.00Distinguished
Description:
Total Possible Score: 30.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes the chosen case.
Proficient - Summarizes the chosen case. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic - Minimally summarizes the chosen case. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize the chosen case; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The summary of the chosen case is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively and clearly evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her
crime(s).
Proficient - Evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s). Minor details are missing or
slightly unclear.
Basic - Minimally evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s). Relevant details are
missing and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s); however,
significant details are missing and unclear.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s)is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively and clearly evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion.
Proficient - Evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion. Minor details are missing or slightly
unclear.
Basic - Minimally evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion. Relevant details are missing
and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion; however, significant
details are missing and unclear.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death
sentence for the client.
Proficient - Analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence for the client. The
analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence for the client.
The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence
for the client; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.
CRJ308.W5A1.07.2018
Summarizes the Chosen Case Total: 4.00
Evaluates the Biopsychosocial Factors that Led the Client to Co ...
Scoring Rubric Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statist.docx
Scoring Rubric: Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statistics
[150 points] – Due Unit 3
Excellent
Above Average
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Total Points
Content
Assessment of Central Tendency and Descriptive Statistics
Central tendency and descriptive statistics described.
The study is described.
Central tendency used in study described.
Assumptions of the central tendency measure are described and evaluated.
Levels of measurement described and evaluated.
Data displays described, their strengths and weaknesses evaluated.
Central tendency and descriptive statistics described; focus could be clearer.
The study is described; focus could be clearer.
Central tendency used in study described; focus could be clearer.
Central tendency assumptions described, but not evaluated.
Levels of measurement described; but not evaluated.
Data displays described but not evaluated.
Central tendency and descriptive statistics identified, but not described.
The study is identified, but some areas are not clearly described.
Central tendency used in study are identified, but some are not clearly described or evaluated.
Central tendency assumptions are identified, but not clearly described or evaluated.
Levels of measurement are identified, but some are not clearly described or evaluated.
Data displays are identified, but not clearly described or evaluated.
A measure of central tendency is not identified or described. Descriptive statistics in the study are not identified or described.
The study is not identified or described.
Central tendency used in study areas are not identified or described.
Central tendency assumptions are not identified or described or evaluated.
Levels of measurement are not identified or described or evaluated.
Data displays are not identified or described or evaluated.
80
68
60
0
of 80
Format/Style
Text, title page, and references page are consistent with APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed.
Assignment is spellchecked and proofread.
Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work.
There are rare errors; most of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with rare exceptions.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with rare exceptions.
Assignment has rare spelling and/or proofreading errors.
Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work with rare exceptions.
There are some errors, but much of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with the APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with a few exceptions.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with a few exceptions.
Assignment has a few spelling and/or proofreading errors.
O.
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance
0
Fail
2
(1-29) Fail
30-39
Fail
40-49
3rd
50-59
2:2
60-69
2:1
70+
1st
Grade Descriptors (Right)
Learning Pillars, Criterion Description and Expectations (Below)
Module Learning Outcome and Industry Competencies
Weighting
No attempt, No submission, Absent
Unsatisfactory, Poor, Week
Incomplete, Inadequate, Limited
Basic, Satisfactory, Sufficient
Appropriate, Fair, Reasonable,
Commendable, Competent, Judicious
Highly Commendable, Outstanding, Exceptional
1
Professional Skills - Executive Summary - Degree to which the executive summary explains the key themes and outcomes of the report in a one page summary
1A,1C
5%
As per grade descriptor
Poor attempt at identifying and
including key themes and/or outcomes. Is unlikely to be limited to one page only
The summary is limited in approach and
therefore incomplete. Possibly over one page in length.
Covers most of the key themes and
outcomes, basic use of information and sources, likely over one page in length.
A one page summary, which provides a
fair and appropriate executive summary to the report.
A commendable, one page summary.
Efficient structure which conveys and logically explains key themes and outcomes.
A strong one page summary. Which is
proficient in explaining key themes and outcomes. Very good structure to the summary.
2
Knowledge and Understanding:
- Introduction completeness and clarity of introduction to the organisation, background, context and rationale for the report being prepared
LO5,4A,4B,5A
10%
As per grade descriptor
Unsatisfactory introduction to the
organisation and background to report. Poor rational is presented. The scope of the report is very broad.
Incomplete introduction and/or background,
inadequate rationale for the report presented. Scope not adequately defined
Acceptable intro and/or background.
Somewhat basic rationale for the research presented. Satisfactory definition of report scope.
Appropriate introduction and/or
background. Fair rationale for the report presented. Scope reasonably well defined.
Commendable introduction and
background presented. Competent rationale presented. Scope well defined.
A strong and well articulated
introduction, the background is proficiently presented with excellent explanation of rationale to the report.
Scope very well defined.
3
Cognitive (thinking) Skills: Literature review:
Information is gathered from multiple, research- based sources. The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the
course is unquestionable
LO2,4A,1C,3C,3D
10%
As per grade descriptor
The literature review is
unsatisfactory in that the research content is irrelevant and/or incomplete with poor analysis and conclusions.
The literature review is inadequate in
that the research content is limited and/or incomplete with the same for it's analysis and conclusions.
The review is a.
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance
0
Fail
2
(1-29) Fail
30-39
Fail
40-49
3rd
50-59
2:2
60-69
2:1
70+
1st
Grade Descriptors (Right)
Learning Pillars, Criterion Description and Expectations (Below)
Module Learning Outcome and Industry Competencies
Weighting
No attempt, No submission, Absent
Unsatisfactory, Poor, Week
Incomplete, Inadequate, Limited
Basic, Satisfactory, Sufficient
Appropriate, Fair, Reasonable,
Commendable, Competent, Judicious
Highly Commendable, Outstanding, Exceptional
1
Professional Skills - Executive Summary - Degree to which the executive summary explains the key themes and outcomes of the report in a one page summary
1A,1C
5%
As per grade descriptor
Poor attempt at identifying and
including key themes and/or outcomes. Is unlikely to be limited to one page only
The summary is limited in approach and
therefore incomplete. Possibly over one page in length.
Covers most of the key themes and
outcomes, basic use of information and sources, likely over one page in length.
A one page summary, which provides a
fair and appropriate executive summary to the report.
A commendable, one page summary.
Efficient structure which conveys and logically explains key themes and outcomes.
A strong one page summary. Which is
proficient in explaining key themes and outcomes. Very good structure to the summary.
2
Knowledge and Understanding:
- Introduction completeness and clarity of introduction to the organisation, background, context and rationale for the report being prepared
LO5,4A,4B,5A
10%
As per grade descriptor
Unsatisfactory introduction to the
organisation and background to report. Poor rational is presented. The scope of the report is very broad.
Incomplete introduction and/or background,
inadequate rationale for the report presented. Scope not adequately defined
Acceptable intro and/or background.
Somewhat basic rationale for the research presented. Satisfactory definition of report scope.
Appropriate introduction and/or
background. Fair rationale for the report presented. Scope reasonably well defined.
Commendable introduction and
background presented. Competent rationale presented. Scope well defined.
A strong and well articulated
introduction, the background is proficiently presented with excellent explanation of rationale to the report.
Scope very well defined.
3
Cognitive (thinking) Skills: Literature review:
Information is gathered from multiple, research- based sources. The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the
course is unquestionable
LO2,4A,1C,3C,3D
10%
As per grade descriptor
The literature review is
unsatisfactory in that the research content is irrelevant and/or incomplete with poor analysis and conclusions.
The literature review is inadequate in
that the research content is limited and/or incomplete with the same for it's analysis and conclusions.
The review is a.
MGT672Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4Exceeds
MGT672
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Requirements
Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Content
Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.
Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.
Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.
25-30 Points
19-24 Points
13-18 Points
7-12 Points
Analysis
Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Sources
Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
4 Points
3 Points
1-2 Points
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
B ...
patient population.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment to create a 1-2 page teaching tool for a selected patient population on how to use the internet to find health information. The teaching tool should be at a 7th grade reading level and identify 3-5 useful websites for the patient group, including what sites to search and avoid. It should also list search strategies. References used to create the tool must be cited in APA format. The assignment will be evaluated on content, analysis, writing skills, and proper use of APA style.
Assignment User FrustrationThe quality of the user experience i.docx
Assignment: User Frustration
The quality of the user experience is very important to the success of an application. In the early days of computing, users often experienced long delays since computing power was poor and networks had comparatively slow throughput. Modern systems have largely eliminated these delays due to increased network and computing power, yet users still report a high level of frustration.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
Describe three (3) reasons users are still frustrated with modern applications.
Suggest one (1) method for reducing the frustrations for each of the reasons you supplied in Question one (1).
Describe methods for determining if user frustration is caused by poor system design or from the natural frustration associated with learning a new software product.
Suggest at least three (3) methods to reduce the frustrations among the disabled population and how this population can be better served.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Describe the inherent design issues across HCI environments.
Explain the use of interaction devices.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in human-computer interaction.
Write clearly and concisely about HCI topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
.
Assignment Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population HealthAlt.docx
Assignment: Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population Health
Although Canada is contiguous to the United States and has some cultural and historical similarities, Canada’s population enjoys a vastly superior health status. Reasons are many, can be traced historically, and are related to a different view of the role of government. The experience of Canada demonstrates that neither a heterogeneous population, nor a health system that has waiting lines for services, are reasons for poor health. By looking critically at what produces good health in Canada, much can be learned about steps the U.S. might need to take if population health is its goal.
The Canadian Best Practices Portal challenges Canadian public health practitioners and researchers to create upstream interventions aimed at the source of a population health problem or benefit. What is being done to address the influences on population health in Canada?
To prepare
for this Assignment, review your Learning Resources. Search the Internet and scholarly research for examples of Canadian “upstream interventions” that can be put forth as examples of either effective or ineffective efforts to improve population health.
The Assignment (2–4 pages):
Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada, intended to improve health inequities. Include an explanation of the inequity and how the intervention targets upstream determinants of health.
Describe the organizations involved and/or social policies enacted in the implementation of the intervention.
Explain whether or not the intervention was/is successful and what lessons public health practitioners can learn from that experience that might improve population health in the United States.
Expand on your insights utilizing the Learning Resources.
Use APA formatting for your Assignment and to cite your resources.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment Elevator Consult Assig.docx
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docx
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripheral systems
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Schol ...
Writing Assignment RubricNote Scholarly resources are defined a.docx
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of the paper being summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development.
Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Only uses scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
23 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Use of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Content of paper is inaccurately portrayed or missing.
Does not follow the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Does not use scholarly resources.
Missing some instruction requirements.
20 points
30
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning
Through critical analysis, the submitted paper provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content.
Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
Paper is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course conten.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1
Understanding the Problem
Value:
10%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background:
The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.
Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.
The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.
Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.
*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.
Complete the Following
You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.
Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.
You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:
Problem
Capabilities
Benefits
Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lec
turer in the class or by notification in the subject site.
Rationale
This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
the context of an information system;
the processes in systems analysis;
the approaches in systems analysis
Marking criteria
Level Attained
Criteria
STANDARDS
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
1. Content of the Vision Document
Maximum
4 Marks
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Ethical C.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docx
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %E ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Heal.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Health Organization Case Study200.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade30.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is not provided.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions. Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is offered in detail.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is not provided.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated by the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is not offered.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing mee.
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
Description Total Possible Score 30.00Distinguished
Description:
Total Possible Score: 30.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively, clearly, and accurately summarizes the chosen case.
Proficient - Summarizes the chosen case. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.
Basic - Minimally summarizes the chosen case. Relevant details are missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize the chosen case; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The summary of the chosen case is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively and clearly evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her
crime(s).
Proficient - Evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s). Minor details are missing or
slightly unclear.
Basic - Minimally evaluates the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s). Relevant details are
missing and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s); however,
significant details are missing and unclear.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the biopsychosocial factors that led the client to commit his or her crime(s)is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively and clearly evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion.
Proficient - Evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion. Minor details are missing or slightly
unclear.
Basic - Minimally evaluates the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion. Relevant details are missing
and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion; however, significant
details are missing and unclear.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the ACEs score calculated for the client in the Week 3 discussion is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death
sentence for the client.
Proficient - Analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence for the client. The
analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally analyzes other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence for the client.
The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze other mitigating factors that may provide a credible argument against a death sentence
for the client; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.
CRJ308.W5A1.07.2018
Summarizes the Chosen Case Total: 4.00
Evaluates the Biopsychosocial Factors that Led the Client to Co ...
Scoring Rubric Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statist.docx
Scoring Rubric: Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statistics
[150 points] – Due Unit 3
Excellent
Above Average
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Total Points
Content
Assessment of Central Tendency and Descriptive Statistics
Central tendency and descriptive statistics described.
The study is described.
Central tendency used in study described.
Assumptions of the central tendency measure are described and evaluated.
Levels of measurement described and evaluated.
Data displays described, their strengths and weaknesses evaluated.
Central tendency and descriptive statistics described; focus could be clearer.
The study is described; focus could be clearer.
Central tendency used in study described; focus could be clearer.
Central tendency assumptions described, but not evaluated.
Levels of measurement described; but not evaluated.
Data displays described but not evaluated.
Central tendency and descriptive statistics identified, but not described.
The study is identified, but some areas are not clearly described.
Central tendency used in study are identified, but some are not clearly described or evaluated.
Central tendency assumptions are identified, but not clearly described or evaluated.
Levels of measurement are identified, but some are not clearly described or evaluated.
Data displays are identified, but not clearly described or evaluated.
A measure of central tendency is not identified or described. Descriptive statistics in the study are not identified or described.
The study is not identified or described.
Central tendency used in study areas are not identified or described.
Central tendency assumptions are not identified or described or evaluated.
Levels of measurement are not identified or described or evaluated.
Data displays are not identified or described or evaluated.
80
68
60
0
of 80
Format/Style
Text, title page, and references page are consistent with APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed.
Assignment is spellchecked and proofread.
Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work.
There are rare errors; most of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with rare exceptions.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with rare exceptions.
Assignment has rare spelling and/or proofreading errors.
Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work with rare exceptions.
There are some errors, but much of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with the APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with a few exceptions.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with a few exceptions.
Assignment has a few spelling and/or proofreading errors.
O.
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance
0
Fail
2
(1-29) Fail
30-39
Fail
40-49
3rd
50-59
2:2
60-69
2:1
70+
1st
Grade Descriptors (Right)
Learning Pillars, Criterion Description and Expectations (Below)
Module Learning Outcome and Industry Competencies
Weighting
No attempt, No submission, Absent
Unsatisfactory, Poor, Week
Incomplete, Inadequate, Limited
Basic, Satisfactory, Sufficient
Appropriate, Fair, Reasonable,
Commendable, Competent, Judicious
Highly Commendable, Outstanding, Exceptional
1
Professional Skills - Executive Summary - Degree to which the executive summary explains the key themes and outcomes of the report in a one page summary
1A,1C
5%
As per grade descriptor
Poor attempt at identifying and
including key themes and/or outcomes. Is unlikely to be limited to one page only
The summary is limited in approach and
therefore incomplete. Possibly over one page in length.
Covers most of the key themes and
outcomes, basic use of information and sources, likely over one page in length.
A one page summary, which provides a
fair and appropriate executive summary to the report.
A commendable, one page summary.
Efficient structure which conveys and logically explains key themes and outcomes.
A strong one page summary. Which is
proficient in explaining key themes and outcomes. Very good structure to the summary.
2
Knowledge and Understanding:
- Introduction completeness and clarity of introduction to the organisation, background, context and rationale for the report being prepared
LO5,4A,4B,5A
10%
As per grade descriptor
Unsatisfactory introduction to the
organisation and background to report. Poor rational is presented. The scope of the report is very broad.
Incomplete introduction and/or background,
inadequate rationale for the report presented. Scope not adequately defined
Acceptable intro and/or background.
Somewhat basic rationale for the research presented. Satisfactory definition of report scope.
Appropriate introduction and/or
background. Fair rationale for the report presented. Scope reasonably well defined.
Commendable introduction and
background presented. Competent rationale presented. Scope well defined.
A strong and well articulated
introduction, the background is proficiently presented with excellent explanation of rationale to the report.
Scope very well defined.
3
Cognitive (thinking) Skills: Literature review:
Information is gathered from multiple, research- based sources. The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the
course is unquestionable
LO2,4A,1C,3C,3D
10%
As per grade descriptor
The literature review is
unsatisfactory in that the research content is irrelevant and/or incomplete with poor analysis and conclusions.
The literature review is inadequate in
that the research content is limited and/or incomplete with the same for it's analysis and conclusions.
The review is a.
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance
0
Fail
2
(1-29) Fail
30-39
Fail
40-49
3rd
50-59
2:2
60-69
2:1
70+
1st
Grade Descriptors (Right)
Learning Pillars, Criterion Description and Expectations (Below)
Module Learning Outcome and Industry Competencies
Weighting
No attempt, No submission, Absent
Unsatisfactory, Poor, Week
Incomplete, Inadequate, Limited
Basic, Satisfactory, Sufficient
Appropriate, Fair, Reasonable,
Commendable, Competent, Judicious
Highly Commendable, Outstanding, Exceptional
1
Professional Skills - Executive Summary - Degree to which the executive summary explains the key themes and outcomes of the report in a one page summary
1A,1C
5%
As per grade descriptor
Poor attempt at identifying and
including key themes and/or outcomes. Is unlikely to be limited to one page only
The summary is limited in approach and
therefore incomplete. Possibly over one page in length.
Covers most of the key themes and
outcomes, basic use of information and sources, likely over one page in length.
A one page summary, which provides a
fair and appropriate executive summary to the report.
A commendable, one page summary.
Efficient structure which conveys and logically explains key themes and outcomes.
A strong one page summary. Which is
proficient in explaining key themes and outcomes. Very good structure to the summary.
2
Knowledge and Understanding:
- Introduction completeness and clarity of introduction to the organisation, background, context and rationale for the report being prepared
LO5,4A,4B,5A
10%
As per grade descriptor
Unsatisfactory introduction to the
organisation and background to report. Poor rational is presented. The scope of the report is very broad.
Incomplete introduction and/or background,
inadequate rationale for the report presented. Scope not adequately defined
Acceptable intro and/or background.
Somewhat basic rationale for the research presented. Satisfactory definition of report scope.
Appropriate introduction and/or
background. Fair rationale for the report presented. Scope reasonably well defined.
Commendable introduction and
background presented. Competent rationale presented. Scope well defined.
A strong and well articulated
introduction, the background is proficiently presented with excellent explanation of rationale to the report.
Scope very well defined.
3
Cognitive (thinking) Skills: Literature review:
Information is gathered from multiple, research- based sources. The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Sources are cited when specific statements are made. Significance to the
course is unquestionable
LO2,4A,1C,3C,3D
10%
As per grade descriptor
The literature review is
unsatisfactory in that the research content is irrelevant and/or incomplete with poor analysis and conclusions.
The literature review is inadequate in
that the research content is limited and/or incomplete with the same for it's analysis and conclusions.
The review is a.
MGT672Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4Exceeds
MGT672
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Requirements
Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Content
Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.
Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.
Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.
25-30 Points
19-24 Points
13-18 Points
7-12 Points
Analysis
Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Sources
Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
4 Points
3 Points
1-2 Points
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
B ...
patient population.docx
This document provides instructions for an assignment to create a 1-2 page teaching tool for a selected patient population on how to use the internet to find health information. The teaching tool should be at a 7th grade reading level and identify 3-5 useful websites for the patient group, including what sites to search and avoid. It should also list search strategies. References used to create the tool must be cited in APA format. The assignment will be evaluated on content, analysis, writing skills, and proper use of APA style.
Similar to Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment Elevator Consult Assig.docx (20)
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docx
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docx
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Writing Assignment RubricNote Scholarly resources are defined a.docx
Writing Assignment RubricNote Scholarly resources are defined a.docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docx
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Heal.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Heal.docx
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
111221, 1104 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecur
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
12122, 241 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Ap
Description Total Possible Score 30.00Distinguished
Description Total Possible Score 30.00Distinguished
Scoring Rubric Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statist.docx
Scoring Rubric Assessing Central Tendency and Descriptive Statist.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
Cw2 Marking Rubric Managerial Finance0Fail2(1-29) Fail.docx
MGT672Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4Exceeds
MGT672Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4Exceeds
More from lynettearnold46882
Assignment User FrustrationThe quality of the user experience i.docx
Assignment: User Frustration
The quality of the user experience is very important to the success of an application. In the early days of computing, users often experienced long delays since computing power was poor and networks had comparatively slow throughput. Modern systems have largely eliminated these delays due to increased network and computing power, yet users still report a high level of frustration.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
Describe three (3) reasons users are still frustrated with modern applications.
Suggest one (1) method for reducing the frustrations for each of the reasons you supplied in Question one (1).
Describe methods for determining if user frustration is caused by poor system design or from the natural frustration associated with learning a new software product.
Suggest at least three (3) methods to reduce the frustrations among the disabled population and how this population can be better served.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Describe the inherent design issues across HCI environments.
Explain the use of interaction devices.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in human-computer interaction.
Write clearly and concisely about HCI topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
.
Assignment Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population HealthAlt.docx
Assignment: Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population Health
Although Canada is contiguous to the United States and has some cultural and historical similarities, Canada’s population enjoys a vastly superior health status. Reasons are many, can be traced historically, and are related to a different view of the role of government. The experience of Canada demonstrates that neither a heterogeneous population, nor a health system that has waiting lines for services, are reasons for poor health. By looking critically at what produces good health in Canada, much can be learned about steps the U.S. might need to take if population health is its goal.
The Canadian Best Practices Portal challenges Canadian public health practitioners and researchers to create upstream interventions aimed at the source of a population health problem or benefit. What is being done to address the influences on population health in Canada?
To prepare
for this Assignment, review your Learning Resources. Search the Internet and scholarly research for examples of Canadian “upstream interventions” that can be put forth as examples of either effective or ineffective efforts to improve population health.
The Assignment (2–4 pages):
Provide a description of an existing intervention in Canada, intended to improve health inequities. Include an explanation of the inequity and how the intervention targets upstream determinants of health.
Describe the organizations involved and/or social policies enacted in the implementation of the intervention.
Explain whether or not the intervention was/is successful and what lessons public health practitioners can learn from that experience that might improve population health in the United States.
Expand on your insights utilizing the Learning Resources.
Use APA formatting for your Assignment and to cite your resources.
.
Assignment Type up an essay on one of two prompts and submit the .docx
Assignment:
Type up an essay on one of two prompts and submit the final draft online.
Choose
only
one
topic:
1.
Symbols are important in Fahrenheit 451. Identify 3 symbols and analyze their references and meanings throughout the novel.
2.
Illustrate how each of Montag's three mentors - a new mentor for each part of the novel - help to spur Montag's ideological progression.
This is the final draft of your individual research paper essay.
1.
Essay must be 7-8 pages typed, not including the works cited page.
2.
Essay must follow MLA format.
3.
Research must include a minimum of 8 sources, 4 of which must be from Library Databases: Proquest, CQ Researcher, Infotrac, Opposing Viewpoints, etc.
4.
Essay must have a complete Works Cited page that cross references correctly to all in-text citations.
Note:
Please submit your document with YOUR last name first. (Example:
Schilf-Research-Paper-Final-Draft.pdf
)
Format:
Follow the BASIC OUTLINE TEMPLATE ( i have already done this part and attached pictures)
A.
Introduction
: Type up an Introduction with an opening strategy (OS) that grabs the readers attention using a story based example (PE, OPE, HYPO, CS, or HYPO/COMBO) that also supports your chosen topic. End the Intro with the Thesis Statement. (Limit 1 to 2 paragraphs)
B.
Body
: Present the analysis position through 3 topic points. Type up the topic sentence and bullet point the evidence (in this case, only quotes from the primary source material). A minimum of 3 quotes for support are needed for each topic point. Ideally, you provide 4 or 5 supporting quotes
C.
Quoting
: Avoid long quotes. Instead, be concise with quoting. You want quotes that are short, dynamic, and memorable. You will still need to set up quotes with a signal phrase that sets up the context of the quote.
D.
Analysis
: Never assume that the quote itself is self-explanatory. You must respond to each quote with your Original Voice (ROV) to illustrate, explain, compare, contrast, identify, analyze, etc. Do not simply restate the quote in your own words. Your response needs to go deeper.
F.
Conclusion
: Type up a Conclusion that revisits the opening strategy story based example. (Limit to 1 paragraph)
G.
Format
: Essay must follow MLA format with a Works Cited page that cross references correctly to all in-text citations.
H.
Length
: Essay should be 3 to 4 pages typed.
Note:
Please submit your document with YOUR last name first. (Example:
Schilf-Fahrenheit-451-Final-Essay.pdf
)
.
Assignment TypeIndividual ProjectDeliverable Length8–10 slid.docx
Assignment Type:
Individual Project
Deliverable Length:
8–10 slides
Points Possible:
150
Management utilities can be vendor-specific or vendor-neutral. There are many utilities that are
available to provide a proactive approach to monitoring each node of the cluster.
Submit a PowerPoint presentation of 8–10 slides that includes the following:
• Identify 1 vendor-specific server-monitoring utility.
• Identify 1 vendor-neutral monitoring utility.
• In your presentation, list advantages and disadvantages of using one or the other.
Your answer should clearly identify what notification and management interfaces each utility has
available (i.e., e-mail enabled, management console, Web-based)
.
Assignment Type Individual discussion Board; 450 – 550 word.docx
Assignment Type
: Individual d
iscussion Board;
450 – 550 words
Leadership varies widely by culture and personality. An international organization with locations in several countries must balance the local customs and cultures with those of the primary culture of the organizations’ headquarters. Using the USA as the headquarters, pick two other countries that might be part of a international internet retail organization and research and discuss the differences that leaders would have to navigate in approach and adapting to different standards of behavior and culture within the countries.
Grading criteria: students are graded on the quality and originality of their posts and responses, not the quantity. Responses should indicate the dilemma that leaders will face in working in cultures where values and leadership styles vary widely from those of the US. Examples may include the use of payments for access, the difficulty that women might experience in dealing with a patriarchal country or other theoretically sound differences in leadership
.
Assignment Two UNIT 2Student Name _______________________.docx
This document provides instructions for Assignment Two in Unit 2 of an art history course. Students are asked to answer 11 questions about important artists and artworks from the time period covered in Unit 2 of their textbook. They must cite sources and submit their written answers through the online learning platform. The questions cover major figures like Giotto, Vermeer, Bruegel, da Vinci, Michelangelo, Goya, Pollock, van Gogh, and others. Students are instructed to draw from the textbook, online resources, and their own opinions in crafting their responses.
Assignment Two Select a college or university and provide th.docx
Assignment Two
Select a college or university and provide the information listed below for the university.
History of the Institution
Mission Statement
Accreditation Status of the Institution
Institutions Goals and Objectives
.
Assignment Two Objectives • Understand how the.docx
Assignment Two
Objectives
• Understand how the AVL tree works
• Give you further practice with C and data structures
Admin
Marks 10 marks, excluding bonus marks. Marking is based on the correctness and
efficiency of your code. Your code must be well commented.
Group? This assignment is completed individually.
Due Time 23:59:59 pm on Sunday 31 March 2019. 23:59:59 pm on Wed 3 April 2019
Late Submissions Late submissions will not be accepted!
In this assignment, you will implement AVL tree and a set of functions associated with AVL
tree. For simplicity, we make the following assumptions:
1. Each item of an AVL tree contains an integer key and an integer value.
2. No AVL tree contains duplicate items. Two items (k1, v1) and (k2, v2) are duplicates
iff k1=k2 and v1=v2 hold.
3. An AVL tree may contains multiple items with the same key and the number of
duplicate keys is a constant.
A template file named MyAVLTree.c is provided. MyAVLTree.c contains the type definitions of
AVL tree and AVL tree node as well as some basic functions. You can add your own helper
functions and auxiliary data structures for better performance in terms of time complexity.
You need to implement the following functions:
1. AVLTree *CreateAVLTree(const char *filename). This function creates an AVL tree by
reading all the items from a text file or from the standard input (keyboard)
depending on the argument filename. If filename is “stdin”, this function will read all
the items from the standard input. Otherwise, it will read all the items from a text
file with filename as its full path name. (2 marks)
An input text file contains zero or more items where each item is of the form (key,
value). Any characters such as white space between two adjacent items are ignored.
For example, the following sample file contains 10 items:
(2, 50) (4, 30) (9, 30) (10, 400) (-5, -40)
(7, 20) (19, 200) (20, 50) (-18, -200) (-2, 29)
Similarly, when reading from the standard input, each input line may have zero or
more items, separated by one or more white space characters. An empty line
indicates the end of input.
In case of an error in the input, this function will print the error and your program
terminates.
You may assume that the input does not contain duplicate items and thus this
function does not need to check for duplicate items.
The time complexity of this function cannot be higher than O(n logn), where n is the
size of the resulting AVL tree. If your time complexity is higher, you will get 0 mark
for this function. You may assume that each call to a C built-in function takes O(1)
time.
2. AVLTree *CloneAVLTree(AVLTree *T). This function creates an identical copy (clone)
of the input AVL tree T, and returns a pointer to the clone tree. (1 mark)
The time complexity of this function cannot be higher than O(n), where n is the size
of T. If your time complexity is high.
Assignment Topic Exploration and Analysis (Proposal)In Week 6 o.docx
This document provides guidelines for a topic exploration and analysis proposal assignment. Students must select and research two social change movements - one from the pre-modern era (pre-1945) and one from the modern era (post-1945). They must analyze and compare the leadership structure, success in promoting social change, and how the movements paralleled each other. The proposal assignment requires identifying the two topics, outlining the planned paper sections, summarizing initial research findings, and including an initial bibliography.
Assignment To consider three sources about the Fall of Rome and w.docx
Assignment:
To consider three sources about the Fall of Rome and write an analytical essay.
Purpose:
To demonstrate proficiency in integrating historical sources and producing a well-informed analytical essay.
Part 1:
Research
Examine three sources:
1.
The textbook explanation concerning the decline and fall of Rome (chapter 7).
2.
The class presentation lecture on the Roman Empire.
3.
An article on the subject (“Friends, Romans, Countrymen” – see the Reading & Study link).
Write a 1,000–1,300-word essay concerning the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.
The paper should have a clear thesis statement, located at the end of the introduction.
The paper should cover the following:
1.
The various viewpoints given in the three sources (focus on the viewpoints you agree with)
2.
The variables involved (social, economic, military, etc.).
3.
Lessons the United States (our people and our government) can learn from Rome’s decline and fall.
4.
Similarities between the actions and attitudes of ancient Rome in their decline and fall and our American society today
Be careful that you use only the three sources provided. Use of other sources will be penalized.Textbook:
Perry, M., Chase, M., Jacob, J. R., Jacob, M. C., & Von Laue, T. H. (2013).
Western civilization: Ideas, politics, and society
(10th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9781111831707.
Williams, S., & Friell, G. (1994). Friends, romans or countrymen? barbarians in the empire.
History Today,
44
(7), 34.
http://bb7.liberty.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-22815357-dt-content-rid-159718173_1/xid-159718173_1
.
Assignment topic Rapid Influenza Testing in Children and Adult.docx
Assignment topic : Rapid Influenza Testing in Children and Adults.
When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools; however, different factors affect the validity and reliability of the results produced by these tests or tools. Nurses must be aware of these factors in order to select the most appropriate test or tool and to accurately interpret the results.
Not only do these diagnostic tests affect adults, body measurements can provide a general picture of whether a child is receiving adequate nutrition or is at risk for health issues. These data, however, are just one aspect to be considered. Lifestyle, family history, and culture—among other factors—are also relevant. That said, gathering and communicating this information can be a delicate process.
For this Assignment, you will consider the
validity
and
reliability
of different assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You will explore issues such as
sensitivity,
specificity,
and
positive
and
negative predictive values
. You will also consider examples of children with various weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information and encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children’s health and weight.
To Prepare
· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider factors that impact the validity and reliability of various assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You also will review examples of pediatric patients and their families as it relates to BMI.
· Search the Library and credible sources for resources explaining the tool or test you were assigned. What is its purpose, how is it conducted, and what information does it gather?
· Also, as you search the library and credible sources, consider what the literature discusses regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, ethical dilemmas, and controversies related to the test or tool.
Assignment
(3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages)
:
For the Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests:
Include the following:
· A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.
o What is its purpose?
o How is it conducted?
o What information does it gather?
· Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool’s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Include references in appropriate APA formatting.
For the Child :
Include the following:
· An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.
· Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.
· Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this infor.
Assignment Topic 1Choose a contemporary painting, sculpture, o.docx
Assignment Topic 1
Choose a contemporary painting, sculpture, or piece of art that captures your interest. This should be a piece created between the end of World War II (about 1945) and today. You may choose one of the illustrations or color inserts in the textbook, or try a virtual museum (check the links in this week's My Humanities Kit).
Before you begin writing your post, view the “Closer Look” art critiques from the unit My Humanities Kit resources. Consider what features are discussed in the piece you select. Aim for an evaluation that notes small details in a work, considers the purpose of various elements, and perhaps investigates the artist’s life.
In the post, begin by introducing the piece of contemporary art created between 1945 and present. What is the title? Who created it and when? What is the style? How would you describe it to someone who had not seen it? Finally, explain why viewing this work is a valuable experience. Connect the Unit 5 reading material in your response; include APA formatting.
Student 1
Hello Class and Professor,
For my piece of Art I have chosen Andy Warhol’s painting “Diamond Dust Shoes 1980”. I not only love the colors that are presented in the piece but the meaning to me signifies how many shoes women fill in our daily lives such as a mother, a friend, a lover, a daughter and etc. I fell a since of gratitude when I look at this colorful piece.
Andy Warhol was born in 1928; he left a huge legacy behind when he passed away in 1987 (Janaro & Altshuler, 2012, p. 142). From drawings, paintings and prints to videography, publishing and performance, he produced more than art -- he was essentially his own brand. From haunting black and white self-portraits to Polaroid snapshots of celebrities, many of the photos in the collection later became the inspiration for Warhol's most well-known Pop Art pieces (Janaro & Altshuler, 2012, p. 142).
Warhol's focus on consumer goods and pop-culture icons, as well as his own taste for money and fame, suggest a life in celebration of the very aspects of American culture that his work criticized (A & E Television Networks, 1996-2013). When looking at this piece of work you have a sense of what life is everyday!
Please look at the link provided below to take a look at this peice of Art. (The last reference below)
Margaret
A & E Television Networks, L. (1996-2013). bio.true story. Retrieved from Andy Warhol Biography: http://www.biography.com/people/andy-warhol-9523875?page=2
Student 2
Hello Class and Professor,
For some reason many of the illustrations in our text I cannot view. So I decided to search for contemporary art photos. There were quite a few interesting images but I found a sculpture or performance piece by Rook Floro that really caught my eye. Oddly, there is no title; at least I have not been able to locate one. Parts of this three-dimensional art look like it has some kind of wiry texture. The piece seems to be an imitation of human emotion. .
Assignment TitleAssessment Item 03 Case Study Analysis – Engagi.docx
Assignment Title
Assessment Item 03: Case Study Analysis – Engaging and Motivating staff
Length
3000-3500 wordsLearning outcomes
1. Knowledge - Describe and critically discuss key principles and theories of Human Resource Management.
2. Problem Solving Skills - Critically evaluate and synthesize relevant information to solve real world issues associated with Human Resource Management.
3. Change Management - Analyse the role of Human Resource Management in implementing change within a global context.
4. Global Environment - Identify and critically discuss local, global and international workforce trends and assess the implications for human resource managementLecturer Discretion
Lecturers may, at their discretion, ask students to verbally present their assignment submission or rewrite some selected part/s of their answer in a controlled setting.Task Details
Engaging and motivating employees is at the centre of Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) practices. It is therefore important to identify the organisational practices that can be used to foster the cognitive, emotional and behavioural qualities that will positively impact on employees and enhance their motivation.
To understand what motivates people to work is essential to this assignment. The focus of the assignment is to identify the motivational theories, the characteristics of a positive work environment and the HR practices that positively influence affective processes (e.g. motivation, commitment, job satisfaction, wellbeing) and behavioural processes (e.g. effort, reduced turnover and absenteeism).
To complete this assignment successfully students at a minimum should:
· Identify the key motivational theories and discuss which of the theories strongly influences employees’ affective processes and behavioural processes.
· Describe the characteristics of a positive work environment and discuss how HR designs jobs to motivate employees.
· Discuss the synthesis of Hackman and Oldham’s (1976) job characteristics and employees’ psychological states in relation to work outcomes, such as intrinsic work motivation, job satisfaction, and high quality work performance.
International Human Resource Management
· Discuss the possible relationship between Maslow’s general components and job characteristics in view of engaging and motivating employees in organisations.
Your assignment must be formatted with heading.
Harvard referencing style must be used.
References
Gallup Consulting 2010, The state of the global workplace: A worldwide study of employee engagement and wellbeing, viewed 20 February 2015
<http://www.gallup.com/services/176300/state-global-workplace.aspx>
Jackson, S & Schuler, R 1995, Understanding Human Resource Management in the context of organisations and their environments, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 237-264.
Pfeffer, J & Veiga, F 1999, Putting people first for organisational success, Academy of
Management Executive, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.37-48.
Runni.
Assignment Title Knowledge management cycle process in or.docx
Assignment Title:
Knowledge management cycle process in organizations and significance communities of practice
Note:
Each question/concept/ topic must be supported with peer reviewed journal references.
Assignment Structure:
Part A.
1.
Provide brief description about knowledge management processes in organizations. (
1 Mark
)
2. Explain the concept of organizational learning and describe the link between individual and organizational leaning. (
2 Marks
)
3. Describe role of organizational culture in knowledge management. (
2 Marks
)
Part B.
1. Describe the concept of community. Describe its key components. (
1 Mark
)
2. Discuss how communities can be linked to organizational memory in order to foster organizational learning and innovation. (
2 Marks
)
3. Highlight some of the key steps you would need to carry out in order to conduct social network analysis of an organization. What sort of questions could the social network analysis answer? (
2 Marks
)
NO plagiarism/ 700 WORDS
.
Assignment Three Technical Descriptions Due March 2 (1155 PM .docx
Assignment Three: Technical Descriptions
Due: March 2 (11:55 PM on Moodle)Peer:Feb 29
For this assignment you will either be creating a technical description or an extended technical definition. Officially, an extended technical definition is a microgenre of a technical description, but there are some differences worth noting. Technical descriptions are “longer explanation[s] . . . of the physical or operational features of an object, mechanism, or process”(Markel 534). While technical descriptions include technical definitions, an extended technical definition is slightly different.
An extended definition includes the three parts of a basic sentence definition, “[1] the term being defined, [2] the category in which the term belongs, and [3] the distinguishing features that differentiate it from its category” (Johnson Sheehan 155). It also expands the definition by adding more details of an object, process, or idea (Markel 534). It is divided by adding some (all) of the following: examples, partition, principle of operation, analogy, negation, and etymology (Markel 538 – 541).
Technical descriptions need a title/indication of the nature/scope of what the description will accomplish; an introduction that answers the questions in table 20.1 on page 545; a body with appropriate detail that discusses each step or section with detail, creativity, and clarity; and a conclusion that usually explains how the steps work together or summarizes the main steps. Look at the guidelines on page 547 for writing tips and additional help.
What you choose to do this on is up to you. You are free to choose any object, place, or process (and the definition of these can be pretty loose—think about my spider example). If you want to choose something that interests you, something you currently work with, something from your future workplace, or something else entirely—go for it. If you want to do something out of the ordinary you can always ask me if it’s okay.
Requirements
· The description/definition should be between 600 to 1000 words.
· It should be typed in a serif font.
· It must focus on clear writing that uses creative and technical writing techniques.
· It should be written for an audience similar to Wikipedia.
· It should follow checklist on page 571 – 572.
Green Hospitality: Green Hospitality:
Saving the EnvironmentSaving the Environment
A student Webzine from the International Council
on Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Education
for Future Hospitality & Tourism Professionals
Vol. 17 No. 1 • ISSN: 1095-7898 Spring 2008
HOSTEUR
INTERNATIONAL
CHRIE
The Hospitality &
Tourism Educators
Volume 17, No. 1 | Spring/Summer 2008 Issue2 HOSTEURTM
Sustainability Standards for the Hotel Industry............5
by Andrew Moreo
Destination “Green”land - a Look at the Sustainable
Efforts of the Air Travel Industry......................9
by Katie Fontaine
Green Hotels..................................................
Assignment ThreeUNIT 3 – ON LINE CLASSStudent Name __________.docx
Assignment Three
UNIT 3 – ON LINE CLASS
Student Name: ______________________________________________
(Name must be exactly as it is on the e campus roll and the same in WEBCOM 2) Turn in assignment through WEBCOM 2 to Professor on time
Your Section Number _____________ (you must enter your section number)
The Unit 3 Assignment 3: Unit Three in the Textbook.
DIRECTIONS: The assignment is in WORD. Save the document to your computer and write your answers in the spaces given. You may change the spacing as needed.
NOTE: Turn in assignments to me through WEBCOM 2 see the place where you send me the assignment. You may either attach your Word file or copy and paste your entire submission. Be thorough in your answers. You should use the Textbook, Essential Humanitiesthird edition and/or the Study Guide. The Study Guide is not mandatory; however, it is there for your enrichment and it is helpful. The Study Guide is in WEBCOM 2 in the tab labeled Student Resources. You may also want to use additional information for any assignments from the Internet. If you do, please remember to cite your source at the end of your answer. If you add additional information from the Internet, this is great, but then be sure to cite your source at the end of your paragraph. You must cite sources. This applies to photos as well.
DIRECTIONS FOR FULL CREDIT: You will need to show how the architectural structure is significant (importance in history and explain its legacy). You should explain how it fits into the historical period and what it reflects about its time and place. Include names of important individuals connected to the construction and especially the name of the architect, if known. Mention the materials used in the construction and include information about how it was built. Also include location. Use full sentences in your answers and be sure to site your answers if you use photos and the internet if you use google. Do not just write in your site that you used google. You must place exact address. Google is too broad of a site for a reference. Thank you
1. List the major time periods in sequential order. The first period is Prehistoric. Then comes Mesopotamia, and then Egypt etc. Under each period, list the minimum of 3 major accomplishments or achievements of that period. See the WEBCOM 2 Resources tab that has the heading timeline and the Textbook Index in front of the textbook for Unit III which lists the periods of time in order
1. Discuss in written statements at least 2 major differences between the Paleolithic Era (Old Stone Age) and the Neolithic Era (New Stone) found during the Prehistoric Period? (Unit 3, Chapter 3). (SLO 3: ULO 3.4).
EXPLAIN ANSWER FULLY USING THE CHART THAT YOU WILL SEE ON A PAGE IN YOUR TEXT
1. Explain how the Sumerian marble statuettes, sculptures, and Queen Puabi’s Harp that were excavated in modern times help us understand how the Sumerian people’s lived and what their beliefs were during the anc.
Assignment title An Evaluation of the Business Strategy at Mc D.docx
Assignment title: An Evaluation of the Business Strategy at Mc Donald’s.
Word count: 4242
Student name: Shane Sunil Mohan
Student number: A001753898
Subject name: 9050PROJ
AQF Level: 9
Discipline: Strategic Management
Theme: Critical Evaluation of a Business Strategy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This paper was fundamentally about conducting a research and analyzing the findings on an evaluation of the business strategy at Mc Donald’s. Mc Donald’s establishment is a centralized, international organization which competes in the fast food industry by supplying hamburgers, french fries, and other consumable items using standardization. Substantial expansion and branding as the main driving force. As mentioned previously, operating in an open market in the food chain sector, one of Mc Donald’s major competition would be Wendy’s. These two establishments offer the exact same service which tends to make it difficult for Mc Donald’s to gain market share. With this being said, this report outlines different strategic strategies in which Mc Donald’s can gain competitive advantage against Wendy’s by providing substantial evidence on Mc Donald’s weaknesses and how it can be improved by using the case study method to help assist presenting its findings.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 4
2.0 Literature Review: 5
2.1 Application of the literature to Mc Donald’s 6
2.2 Analysis with respect to Neoclassical microeconomics: 7
2.3 Analysis with respect to Evolutionary economics: 8
3.0 Research Methodology: 9
3.1 Case study method: 9
3.2 Data Collection: 10
3.3 Presentation of findings: 10
3.4 Analyzing the data: 11
4.0 Data Analysis and Reflections 11
4.1 Presentation of data 11
4.2 Reflection on findings and implications: 12
5.0 Conclusion and Recommendations: 14
5.1 Addressing social changes with differentiation strategy: 15
5.2 Recommendation: Improved Promotional Strategy: 16
5.3 Conclusion 16
References 18
1.0 Introduction
With the increase in the trend of globalization and the increasing competition in global markets, companies work day and night to come with effective strategies. Some of the multinational companies are known for the strategies they use and practice. In this paper, two of the companies operating in the United States of America will be discussed and compared along with the suggestion of a competitive strategy for McDonald’s. One of the companies that was researched in this paper name is McDonald's. This company operates internationally while the opposition organization which is Wendy’s also known as a fast food restaurant operates in the United States of America. As far as McDonald's is concerned, McDonald's was established in the year 1940 by Richard and Maurice McDonald, in San Bernardino, California, United States. The organization's business structure depends on three basic axes: representatives, franchisees, and suppliers. This business structure made by the founder of the organization, Ray Kroc, is known as "the three-legged sto.
ASSIGNMENT The student will submit a research project that compares.docx
ASSIGNMENT: The student will submit a research project that compares and contrasts two organizations in the same sector (Career Education Corporation and the Apollo Group Inc. or any other that you prefer), including analysis of the following criteria: legal, social, and economic environments; management structure; operational and financial issues; and impact of potential change factors.
1) Student should analyze the basic legal, social, and economic environments of the organization
2) Student should analyze the managerial, operational and financial issues of the organization
3) Student will analyze the impact of potential change factors as they related to the organization.
4) Student should apply appropriate college level writing standard.
the submission should be in APA Format. LENGTH of Paper: 5 Body Pages
.
Assignment Three Case study report – mixed mediaValue 40 .docx
Assignment Three: Case study report – mixed media
Value: 40% of the total marks for the unit
Length: 2000 words, or 5-6 minute video, or audio-narrated powerpoint of 10-15 slides, or photo essay supported with 500 words
Due: Week 12
Task description
Attend the event nominated in Assignment 2.
Briefly describe the event – name, date, location and venue, and attendance numbers and demographics.
Describe and critically analyse the positive and negative impacts of the event utilising the principles of sustainability and the triple bottom line approach.
Describe and discuss how the event’s program elements related to the aims and objectives identified in Assignment Two.
Describe and discuss the marketing of the event and how the promoted experience related to the actualisation and attainment of its aims and objectives (include actual audience details – numbers, demographic composition).
Provide recommendations for future activities which clearly identify issues relevant to event management.
The task is a report on the event nominated in Assignment Two that uses the triple bottom line approach to identify and critically analyse - the attainment of the events aims and objectives; the positive and negative economic, environmental, sociocultural impacts of the event; and recommendations which clearly identify issues relevant to the event management.
The evaluation report should use creativity in the approach to the task style.
The assignment may be presented as a 2000 word essay, or a 5-6 minute video, or an audio-narrated powerpoint of 10-15 slides, or a photo essay supported with 500 words. The process for submission of this assessment will depend upon the format chosen and prior negotiation with the tutor is required.
.
Assignment The Nurse Leader as Knowledge WorkerThe term kn.docx
Assignment: The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker
The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,
The Landmarks of Tomorrow
(1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?
Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.
In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.
Reference: Drucker, P. (1959).
The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
To Prepare:
Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources.
Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.
The Assignment:
Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.
Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.
.
More from lynettearnold46882 (20)
Assignment User FrustrationThe quality of the user experience i.docx
Assignment User FrustrationThe quality of the user experience i.docx
Assignment Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population HealthAlt.docx
Assignment Upstream Approaches to Canadian Population HealthAlt.docx
Assignment Type up an essay on one of two prompts and submit the .docx
Assignment Type up an essay on one of two prompts and submit the .docx
Assignment TypeIndividual ProjectDeliverable Length8–10 slid.docx
Assignment TypeIndividual ProjectDeliverable Length8–10 slid.docx
Assignment Type Individual discussion Board; 450 – 550 word.docx
Assignment Type Individual discussion Board; 450 – 550 word.docx
Assignment Two UNIT 2Student Name _______________________.docx
Assignment Two UNIT 2Student Name _______________________.docx
Assignment Two Select a college or university and provide th.docx
Assignment Two Select a college or university and provide th.docx
Assignment Two Objectives • Understand how the.docx
Assignment Two Objectives • Understand how the.docx
Assignment Topic Exploration and Analysis (Proposal)In Week 6 o.docx
Assignment Topic Exploration and Analysis (Proposal)In Week 6 o.docx
Assignment To consider three sources about the Fall of Rome and w.docx
Assignment To consider three sources about the Fall of Rome and w.docx
Assignment topic Rapid Influenza Testing in Children and Adult.docx
Assignment topic Rapid Influenza Testing in Children and Adult.docx
Assignment Topic 1Choose a contemporary painting, sculpture, o.docx
Assignment Topic 1Choose a contemporary painting, sculpture, o.docx
Assignment TitleAssessment Item 03 Case Study Analysis – Engagi.docx
Assignment TitleAssessment Item 03 Case Study Analysis – Engagi.docx
Assignment Title Knowledge management cycle process in or.docx
Assignment Title Knowledge management cycle process in or.docx
Assignment Three Technical Descriptions Due March 2 (1155 PM .docx
Assignment Three Technical Descriptions Due March 2 (1155 PM .docx
Assignment ThreeUNIT 3 – ON LINE CLASSStudent Name __________.docx
Assignment ThreeUNIT 3 – ON LINE CLASSStudent Name __________.docx
Assignment title An Evaluation of the Business Strategy at Mc D.docx
Assignment title An Evaluation of the Business Strategy at Mc D.docx
ASSIGNMENT The student will submit a research project that compares.docx
ASSIGNMENT The student will submit a research project that compares.docx
Assignment Three Case study report – mixed mediaValue 40 .docx
Assignment Three Case study report – mixed mediaValue 40 .docx
Assignment The Nurse Leader as Knowledge WorkerThe term kn.docx
Assignment The Nurse Leader as Knowledge WorkerThe term kn.docx
Recently uploaded
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdYour Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Recently uploaded (20)
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 1 - REVISION POWERPOINT.pptx
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment Elevator Consult Assig.docx
- 1. Assignment RubricUnit 3 Written Assignment: Elevator Consult Assignment Total available points =10Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScore WeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Oral PresentationPresentation was not concise or orderly by systems and did not included an HPI, pertinent finding on exam or, suggested plan of care. Extraneous information was included.Presentation was not concise, was not orderly by systems and included an incomplete HPI, incomplete pertinent finding on exam and an incomplete suggested plan of care. Extraneous information was included.Presentation was concise, but was not orderly by systems and included an incomplete HPI, incomplete pertinent finding on exam and an incomplete suggested plan of care. No extraneous information was included.Presentation was concise, orderly by systems and included HPI, pertinent finding on exam, suggested plan of care. No extraneous information was included. 490%3.60APA format with supporting evidence based resources less than 3 years old.Did not follow APA formatMajor errors with APA formattingText, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errorsText, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work.410%0.40Final Score10Percentage100%Feedback: