Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Develop a patient-focused evidence based management plan for this patient.There is no mention of a management plan for this patient.The management plan is partially developed but not based on evidenceThe management plan is mostly developed but the evidence base is not strong The management plan is evidence based and completely developed16%0.00Pertinent DiagnosticsThere is no evidence of any diagnosticsDiagnostic tests poorly addressedDiagnostics partially addressedDiagnostics thoroughly addressed15%0.00Prepare a detailed, comprehensive, patient-centered education plan.There is no mention of an education plan The education plan is included but it is provider-centered vs patient-centeredThe education plan is included and is patient-centered but incompleteThe education plan is included and is patient-centered and complete16%0.00Cultural and lifestyle considerationsThere is no mention cultural and lifestyle considerationsContent poorly addressedContent addressed but more detail is needed or content inconclusive Cultural and lifestyle considerations thoroughly addressed15%0.00Information on health promotion or health care maintenace needsTher is no mention Content poorly addressedHealth promotion or health care mainHealth promotion or health care maintenance needs thoroughly addressed12%0.00Describe the developmental educational strategies you will use with this patientThere is no mention of development educational strategies for this education planThere is some mention of developmental educational strategies but they are not appropriate for the patient’s age and developmental levelThe educational strategies are identified and described to great extent but not completelyThe educational strategies are well-identified and thoroughly described 12%0.00Describe the follow-up with specific time lines for this patient. For example, when should he return to the clinic for his next visit?There is no mention of follow-up for this patientThere is some description for the follow up for this patient but there is not a specific time line identifiedThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient but it is not supported with evidence-based clinical guidelinesThere is a description of the time line for follow up for this patient and it is well-supported with evidence-based clinical guidelines14%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions)IntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject v.

1. Assignment RubricUnit 3 assignment grading rubric.
Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values
between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column.
Total available points =100Content
RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScore
WeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Develop a patient-
focused evidence based management plan for this patient.There
is no mention of a management plan for this patient.The
management plan is partially developed but not based on
evidenceThe management plan is mostly developed but the
evidence base is not strong The management plan is evidence
based and completely developed16%0.00Pertinent
DiagnosticsThere is no evidence of any diagnosticsDiagnostic
tests poorly addressedDiagnostics partially
addressedDiagnostics thoroughly addressed15%0.00Prepare a
detailed, comprehensive, patient-centered education plan.There
is no mention of an education plan The education plan is
included but it is provider-centered vs patient-centeredThe
education plan is included and is patient-centered but
incompleteThe education plan is included and is patient-
centered and complete16%0.00Cultural and lifestyle
considerationsThere is no mention cultural and lifestyle
considerationsContent poorly addressedContent addressed but
more detail is needed or content inconclusive Cultural and
lifestyle considerations thoroughly
addressed15%0.00Information on health promotion or health
care maintenace needsTher is no mention Content poorly
addressedHealth promotion or health care mainHealth
promotion or health care maintenance needs thoroughly
addressed12%0.00Describe the developmental educational
strategies you will use with this patientThere is no mention of
development educational strategies for this education planThere
is some mention of developmental educational strategies but
they are not appropriate for the patient’s age and developmental

2. levelThe educational strategies are identified and described to
great extent but not completelyThe educational strategies are
well-identified and thoroughly described 12%0.00Describe the
follow-up with specific time lines for this patient. For example,
when should he return to the clinic for his next visit?There is no
mention of follow-up for this patientThere is some description
for the follow up for this patient but there is not a specific time
line identifiedThere is a description of the time line for follow
up for this patient but it is not supported with evidence-based
clinical guidelinesThere is a description of the time line for
follow up for this patient and it is well-supported with
evidence-based clinical guidelines14%0.00Content
Score0Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no
deductions)IntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredS
coreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe
overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence
structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions,
and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several
confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make
understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper
meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on
sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make
it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However,
the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact.
There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some
missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences,
but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear.
There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices
or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled
words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with
the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of
incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few
places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as
confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few
misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present
but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of

3. the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper
has some good information or research, but it does not follow
assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and
content.The order of information is confusing in several places
and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of
the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible
purpose and follows assignment directions overall.The order of
information is confusing in a few places and the lack of
organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper
in a minor way.The overall order of the information is clear and
contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one
paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other
minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and
hard to understand. Meets length
requirements.420%0.80APAThere is some attempt at APA
formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such
as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be
missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear.This is an
attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text
citations and reference listings. Citation information may be
missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference
citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at
least one place. Authorship is generally clear.There is an overall
attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear
to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference
list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations
generally make authorship clear.There is a strong attempt to cite
all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such
as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-
text citation errors such as a missing page number or a
misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make
authorship clear.410%0.40Writing Deduction0Final
Score0Percentage0%Feedback:
&"Arial,Bold"&18Assignment/Project Rubric