When working on digital projects, it is necessary to utilize experience in various departments within and outside of the library. A planning document called a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) serves as an agreement between all stakeholders, which will likely include multiple library departments. In order to set expectations, an MOU can assist in the following ways: (1) Evaluating current and potential infrastructure; (2) Determining whether funding is needed or available, (3) Establishing clearly demarcated responsibilities and outcomes for each individual participant, (4) Accounting for and settling potential disagreements, and (5) Serving as a project management plan.
2. About Us
Rafia Mirza Digital Humanities Librarian
@LibrarianRafia | rafia@uta.edu
Peace Ossom Williamson Research Data Librarian
@123POW| peace@uta.edu
Brett D. Currier Director of Scholarly Communications
@BrettDCurrier| brett.currier@uta.edu
6. External partners may have
• Expectations that are higher than possible
• Expectations that technology does not allow
• Expectations that do not coincide with strategic priorities
• Expectations that are unfair
7. Librarians tend to have
• Inclinations toward saying “Yes”
• Inclinations toward gold plating
• Inclinations toward not expecting shared credit
• Inclinations toward providing seamless (invisible)
service
13. Estimate of Institutional Support
Name Job
Title
Expertise Hours Inst.
Rate
Market
Rate
Inst.
Total
Market
Total
Total
Description of
Hardware/Software
Institution
Cost
Market
Cost
Institution
Total
Market
Total
Total
14. Workbook Contents
• Introduction
MOU Documents
• Workflow & Instructions
• General Template & Instructions
• Estimate of Institutional Support & Instructions
MOUs for Standardized Projects
• Systematic Reviews
• Open Access eJournal Hosting & Publishing
Rafia: You agree on blueprint before you commit resources, so you both know you are building a ranch house, and one partner is not expecting a mansion, while you think you are making a birdhouse. / Make service visible, turn it into collaboration: /Make the amount of work a project will take visible before it is begun /Accidental Commitments/ Positive Experiences b/c of MOU use./ Clarity of roles, process, timelines, and expected outcomes for all parties
Service:
http://literaturegeek.com/2016/02/28/DHjobtalk/ http://acrl.ala.org/dh/2013/06/19/in-service-a-further-provocation-on-digital-humanities-research-in-libraries/
Whole issue: is everyone has different expectations, so this whole process is about making sure all partners are on the same page
For a long time libraries had established workflows AND liaisons tended to work alone, but now so many changes, and doing many types of projects you had not done before (so hard to judge how long they will take )
Rafia: NOTE Specific examples.
1. 10 year project timeline want to do in 1 year.
2. Omeka (web vs. server install. 500 mb vs. Server space)
3. Collection vs. Project area focus/Scope
4. Timeline
Rafia
During and after implementation: Attribution
Publication
Conference
presentation
Grant application
Funding allocation
Disruption
Overview
Each template that you might want to use has been added as a word document so you can pull it out to edit and make changes.
Phase I - Library stakeholders: Talk to their supervisor. Consulted b/c long term plans of that department or the library
Phase II – Timelines/ Software Needs
Phase III - No major substantive change, getting final approval/sign off
Phase IV: No work started before now, documents in one place can become a template for your own institution
Rafia
Talk briefly about how we have covered much of the workbook and that as you continue with certain projects, you may developed MOU templates for these as we have with systematic reviews and open access journal hosting and publishing